ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
February
3,
1994
TED HORTON CHEVROLET,
Petitioner,
V.
)
PCB 94—49
(UST Fund)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by C.A. Manning):
On February 1,
1994, Ted Horton Chevrolet (“Horton”)
filed a
petition for review of an Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
(“Agency”)
final
reimbursement
determination
to
access
the
Underground Storage Tank Fund. The Agency issued an invoice voucher
on December 21, 1993 accompanied by Attachment A which contains the
stated reasons for deductions,
and the final reimbursement check
was
issued
by
the
Comptroller
thereafter..1
The
reimbursement
determination concerns Horton’s site located at
129
East
147th
Street,
Harvey,
Cook
County,
Illinois.
This
matter
is
hereby
accepted for hearing.
The hearing
must
be
scheduled
and
completed
in
a
timely
manner,
consistent
with
Board
practices
and
the
applicable
statutory decision deadline or the waiver provisions of
35
111.
Adm.
Code
101.105.
The
Chief
Hearing
Officer
shall
assign
a
hearing officer to conduct hearings.
The Clerk of the Board shall
promptly
issue
appropriate
directions
to
the
assigned
hearing
officer consistent with this order.
The assigned hearing officer shall
inform the Clerk of the
Board of the time and location of the hearing at least 40 days in
advance of hearing so that public notice may be published.
After
hearing,
the hearing
officer
shall
submit
an
exhibit
list,
a
1The
Board
must
state
its
reservations
about
the Agency’s
statement,
on its invoice voucher, that “for purposes of appeal,
this voucher constitutes the Agency’s final decision as of the date
the check was issued by the Comptroller.”
Given the past history
of the UST Fund,
in which there have been long delays in payment
because
the
Fund
was
exhausted,
the
Board
is
concerned
by
a
scenario in which the Agency’s obligation to make a final decision,
which
cannot
be
amended
(see
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency
v.
Pollution Control Board
(November 23,
1993),
No.
5—92—
0468), is extended while the invoice voucher is awaiting payment by
the Comptroller.
~
also Guether v.
IEPA,
(February 3, 1994) PCB
93—232.)
2
statement
regarding
credibility
of
witnesses
and
all
actual
exhibits
to
the Board
within
five
days
of
the hearing.
Any
briefing schedule shall provide for final filings as expeditiously
as possible and, in time—limited cases, no later than 30 days prior
to the decision due date,
which is the final regularly scheduled
Board meeting date on or before the statutory or deferred decision
deadline.
In this case, pursuant to Section 40(a) (2) of the Act,
the statutory decision deadline
is June
1,
1994;
therefore,
the
decision due date is May 19,
1994.
If
after
appropriate
consultation
with
the
parties,
the
parties
fail to provide an acceptable hearing date
or
if
after
attempting to do so, the hearing officer is unable to consult with
the parties, the hearing officer shall unilaterally set a hearing
date in conformance with the above schedule.
The hearing officer
and the parties are encouraged to expedite this proceeding to the
extent possible.
This order will not appear in the Board’s opinion volumes.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Dorothy N.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Boar
,
hereby cert
y that the above order was adopted on the
day of
,
1994,
by a vote of
_‘7
—c~
/L~
Dorothy M. Gr~n,
Clerk
Illinois PolMition Control Board