1. NOTICE OF FILING
      1. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
STATE OF
ILLINOIS
Lisa Madigan
VIlORNEY
GENRRA
The Honorable
Dorothy Gunn
Illinois
Pollution Control
Board
James
R. Thompson Center,
Ste.
11-500
100
West
Randolph
July
14,
2005
RECEIVED
CLE~K’S
OFFICE
JUL
192005
STATE OF ILLINOIS
GENERAL
Pollution Control Board
Oct
Chicago,
Illinois 60601
Re:
Peop!e
v.
Bridgeport Grain,
Inc.
Dear Clerk
Gunn:
Enclosed for
filing please find
the original
and
ten copies of a
Notice
of
Filing,
Entry
of
Appearance and Complaint in regard to the above-captioned matter.
Please file the originals and
return file-stamped copies of the documents to our office in the enclosed, self-addressed envelope.
Thank
you for your cooperation and
consideration.
Enclosures
Very truly yours,
/~
~
Phillip McQuillan
Environmental Bureau
500 South
Second Street
Springfield,
Illinois 62706
(217)
782-9031
500 South
Second Sneer, Springfield,
Illinois
02706
1217) 782~l090
I~li: (217)
7133-2771
Fax: (2!?)
7132—7046
lOt) West
RandoLph
Srrcer.
Chicago, Illinois
60601
(511)
614—30(1))
Ill
I3Il~614—3374
Fax: (311)
614—ShuN
1001 Fist
\iain
C.Irl:onlale
Illinois
620)11
(HtMl
.320—1i4110I
fl:
(NIH
526.6403
lax:
HIS)
S’Q—6116
PM/pp

RECEIVED
CLEnK~S
OFFICE
BEFORE THE
ILLINOIS POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
JUL
192005
PEOPLE
OF THE STATE
OF
)
STATE OF
ILLINOIS
ILLINOIS,
)
Pollution Control Board
)
Complainant,
vs.
)
PCBNo.
(Enforcement)
BRIDGEPORT GRAIN,
INC.,
an Illinois corporation,
Respondent.
NOTICE OF FILING
To:
Bridgeport
Grain,
Inc.
an
Illinois
corporation
do Arthur
A.
Eubank, Jr.,
R.A.
902 Monroe Street
Evanston,
IL
60202-2627
PLEASE TAKE
NOTICE that on this date
I
mailed for filing with
the Clerk of the Pollution
Control
Board
of
the State
of
Illinois,
a
COMPLAINT,
a
copy
of
which is
attached
hereto
and
herewith
served
upon you.
Failure
to file
an
answer to
this Complaint within
60
days may
have
severe consequences.
Failure to
answer will
mean
that all
allegations
in
this Complaint will
be
taken
as
if
admitted
for
purposes
of
this
proceeding.
If
you
have
any
questions
about
this
procedure, you
should contact
the hearing officer assigned
to this proceeding, the Clerk’s
Office
or an
attorney.
1

FURTHER,
please
take
notice
that
financing
may
be
available,
through
the
Illinois
Environmental Facilities
Financing Act, 20
ILCS
3515/1
(2002),
to correct the pollution alleged
in
the Complaint filed
in
this
case.
Respectfully submitted,
PEOPLE
OF THE STATE
OF ILLINOIS
LISA MADIGAN,
Attorney General of the
State of
Illinois
MATTHEW
J
DUNN, Chief
Environmental Enforcement/Asbestos
Uti9a~n2sio
PHILLIP’McQU
LLAN
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental
Bureau
500 South
Second Street
Springfield,
Illinois
62706
217/782-9031
Dated:
July
14,
2005
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I
hereby certify
that I did
on
July
14,
2005,
send
by certified
mail,
with
postage thereon
fully prepaid,
by depositing
in a
United
States
Post Office
Box a true
and
correct copy of the
following
instruments entitled
NOTICE OF FILING,
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE and
COMPLAINT:
To:
Bridgeport Grain,
Inc.
an
Illinois
corporation
c/o Arthur A.
Eubank,
Jr.,
R.A.
902
Monroe Street
Evanston,
IL
60202-2627
and the original
and
ten copies
by
First Class
Mail with
postage thereon fully prepaid
of the
same
foregoing
instrument(s):
To:
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Illinois
Pollution Control
Board
James
R.
Thompson Center
Suite 11-500
100
West
Randolph
Chicago,
Illinois 60601
Phillip
Mc
illan
Assistant Attorney General
This
filing is
submitted
on
recycled paper.

-
RECEiVED
BEFORE THE
ILLINOIS POLLUTION
CONTROL SQARD
LEF?fc~OFFICE
PEOPLE
OF THE STATE
OF
)
JUL
192005
ILLINOIS,
)
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Pollution
Control Board
Complainant,
)
vs.
)
PCB No.
v
(Enforcement)
BRIDGEPORT GRAIN,
Inc.,
an
Illinois corporation,
Respondent.
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
On
behalf
of
the
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
PHILLIP
McQUILLAN, Assistant Attorney General of
the State of
Illinois,
hereby enters
his appearance as
attorney of
record.
Respectfully submitted,
PEOPLE
OF THE
STATE OF ILLINOIS,
LISA MADIGAN
Attorney General
of the
State
of Illinois
MATTHEW J.
DUNN, Chief
Environmental
Enforcement/Asbestos
BY:__________
PF-IILLIP
M”’OQUILLAN
Environmental
Bureau
Assistant Attorney General
500
South
Second Street
Springfield,
Illinois
62706
217/782-9031
Dated:
July
14, 2005

RECEIVED
CLERK’S OFFICE
BEFORE THE
ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL BOARD
JUL
192005
PEOPLE
OF THE
STATE
OF ILLINOIS,
)
P~liutSd
Complainant,
PCBNO.O(P’~~
BRIDGEPORT
GRAIN,
INC.,
)
(Enforcement)
an
Illinois corporation,
Respondent.
COMPLAINT
NOW
COMES the Complainant, PEOPLE
OF THE
STATE
OF ILLINOIS,
by LISA
MADIGAN,
Attorney General
of the State
of
Illinois,
and
complains
of the Respondent,
BRIDGEPORT
GRAIN,
INC.,
as follows:
COUNT
I
AIR POLLUTION
1.
This Count is brought by
the Attorney General of
the
State of
Illinois on her own
motion
and
at the request of the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection Agency (“Illinois
EPA”),
pursuant to
the terms and
provisions of
Section
31
of the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection Act
(“the Act’),
415
ILCS
5/31
(2002).
2.
The
Illinois
EPA
is an
agency of
the
State of
Illinois
created
by the
Illinois
General Assembly
in
Section 4 of
the Act, 415
ILCS
5/4 (2002),
and
charged,
inter a/ia,
with
the
duty of enforcing the Act in
proceedings
before the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board.
3.
The Complaint
is brought pursuant to
Section
31
of
the Act, 415
ILCS
5/31
(2002),
after providing the Respondent with
notice and
opportunity for a
meeting
with the
Illinois
EPA.

4.
Respondent Bridgeport Grain,
Inc., (“Bridgeport”) is
an
Iliinois
corporation
in
good standing.
5.
At all
times
relevant to
this Complaint,
Bridgeport has
owned and
operated
a
grain elevator facility located
123
Main Street,
Bridgeport, Lawrence
County,
Illinois
(the
“facility”).
6.
The emission
sources
at the facility include grain
pits,
railcar loading
operations,
truck loading
operations,
and
grain
handling
operations.
Respondent’s operations
at the facility
are governed
by permit numbered
72111147
issued
by
the
Illinois
EPA.
Permit conditions
require proper housekeeping practices
with
maintenance of checklists
and
good
operating
practices to
minimize
particulate
matter emissions.
7.
On January
9,
2002,
an
inspection was
performed
by the Illinois
EPA
in
response to
citizen complaints
regarding
dust and
odors.
Rotten
grain was observed
in ar’i~
around the
pits,
storage
bins,
the base
of the grain dryer, the railcar loading
area,
the railroad
tracks,
and
on
the driveway through the
pit
area at
the facility; corn
chaff was observed
-
throughout the elevator and outside
of the facility.
The Illinois
EPA
reviewed the facility’s
housekeeping checklist
and
determined that the most recent entry was
dated
August
14,
2001.
The truck load-outs
utilized
inadequate socks for
particulate matter
control.
The
Illinois
EPA
determined
that the conditions at the facility created
a potential
for dust and odor problems.
8.
After the issuance of a violation
notice on
March
1,
2002,
Respondent and
the
Illinois
EPA agreed
to
a compliance commitment
agreement, which included a weekly
housekeeping checklist,
ongoing
cleanup of rotten grain,
construction of an enclosure over the
dump
pits
by September
30, 2002,
implementation of
load-out socks long
enough
to penetrate
vehicles
by
6
inches when
loading,
and
prompt
replacement
of socks.
9.
On
or about January
4,
2003,
an inspection
was performed
by the
Illinois
EPA.
Corn chaff was
observed
in
the street gutters of Olive
Street to the
North of the dump
pits.
An
2

enclosure over the dump pits
had
not been
constructed.
Particulate
matter emissions were
observed
during
the loading
of a
railcar; the loadout sock was approximately 4
inches above the
openings to
the
railcar.
Rotten
grain was observed
on
the
scale
house,
along
the building next
to the dump pits,
and around
and
under the grain dryer and
its
surrounding
concrete
pad
area.
A subsequent
review of the housekeeping
checklists
revealed
that such were
not consistently
used
on a weekly bases and
did
not include
the load-out socks,
the grain
dryer and
its
surrounding concrete
pad area.
The Illinois
EPA determined
that
the conditions
at the facility
still
created
a
potential
for dust and odor problems.
10.
Respondent subsequently committed
to
a compliance
plan with
a deadline
of
September
30, 2003,
in
discussions with
the
Illinois
EPA
pursuant to
Section
31
of the
Act.
11.
On
October
15,
2003,
an
inspection was
performed
by
the
Illinois
EPA.
Although
some work
had
been
done,
the enclosure
for the dump
pits had
not been completed.
Rotten
grain
near the grain
dryer pad
and particulate
matter emissions from
a hole
in the
head
house
of the transfer system were observed.
12.
Section
9 of the Act,
415
ILCS 5/9 (2002)
provides,
in
the pertinent
part,
that:
No
person
shall:
a.
Cause or threaten
or allow the discharge or emission of any
contaminant
into
the environment
in
any
State
so
as to
cause
or tend to
cause air
pollution
in
Illinois, whether alone or in
combination with
contaminants
from other sources,
or so as
to violate regulations or standards
adopted
by
the
Board
under this Act;
b.
Construct,
install,
or operate any equipment,
facility, vehicle, vessel,
or
aircraft capable of causing
or contributing
to air pollution or designed
to
prevent
air pollution,
of any
type designated
by Board
regulations, without
a permit granted
by the Agency, or in
violation of any conditions
imposed
by such
permit;
***
13.
Section
212.461(b) of the Board’s Air Pollution
Regulations,
35111.
Adm.
Code
212.461(b),
provides
as follows:
3

b)
Housekeeping
Practices.
All grain-handling
and
grain-drying
operations,
regardless
of size, must implement
and
use the following housekeeping
practices:
1)
Air pollution control
devices shall
be checked
daily and
cleaned as
necessary
to
insure proper operation.
2)
Cleaning
and
Maintenance.
A)
Floors shall
be
kept swept and
cleaned from
boot
pit to cupola
floor.
Roof
or bin
decks
and other exposed flat
surfaces shall be
kept clean
of grain
and
dust that would
tend to
rot
or become
airborne.
B)
Cleaning
shall
be
handled
in
such a manner as
not to permit
dust
to escape
to the atmosphere.
C)
The yard
and
surrounding
open
area,
including
but not
limited to
ditches
and
curbs, shall
be
cleaned
to prevent
the accumulation
of
rotting grain.
3)
Dump
Pit.
A)
Aspiration equipment
shall be
maintained
and
operated.
B)
Dust control devices shall
be
maintained
and
operated.
4)
Head
House.
The
head house shall be
maintained
in
such a fashion
that
visible quantities
of dust or dirt are
not allowed
to escape
to the
atmosphere.
5)
Property.
The yard
and
driveway
of any
source
shall be
asphalted,
oiled
or equivalently treated
to control
dust.
6)
Housekeeping Check
List.
Housekeeping check lists
to
be developed
by
the Agency
shall be
completed
by the manager and
maintained on the
premises for inspection
by Agency
personnel.
14.
Section
212.462(d)(1)
of the Board’s Air Pollution
Regulations,
35
IIl.Adm.Code
212.462(d)(1),
provides:
Truck and
hopper car loading
shall employ
socks,
sleeves,
or equivalent devices,
which
extend
6
inches below the sides of the receiving
vehicle, except for
topping off.
Choke
loading shall
be
considered an equivalent method as
long
as
the discharge
is no
more
than
12
inches above
the sides of the receiving vehicle.
15.
Section
201.141
of
the Board’s Air Pollution
Regulations,
35
III.Adm.Code
201.141, provides:
No
person shall
cause
or threaten
or allow the discharge or emission of any
contaminant
into the environment
in
any
State so as,
either alone or in
combination with
contaminants
from other sources,
to cause
or tend
to cause
air pollution
in Illinois, or so
as
to violate the provisions of the Chapter,
or so as
4

to prevent the attainment
or maintenance of
any applicable ambient air quality
standard.
16.
By failing
to comply with
the housekeeping and
operating
practices,
Bridgeport
has violated
Section
212.461(b) of the Board’s Air Pollution
Regulations,
35
III.
Adm.
Code
212.461(b).
17.
By failing
to control
particulate
matter emissions with
adequate
load out socks or
equivalent measures,
Bridgeport
Grain
has violated
Section
212.462(d)(1)of the Board’s Air
Pollution
Regulations,
35
lII.Adm.Code 212.462(d)(1).
18.
By
failing to
implement the required
housekeeping practices
and
particulate
matter emissions
controls,
Bridgeport
Grain
has violated
Section
201.141
of the Board’s Air
Pollution
Control
Regulations,
35
lll.Adm.Code
201.141
19.
By
failing
to
clean up
rotten grain,
and
by
failing
to control
particulate
matter
emissions with
adequate
loadout
socks and
other measures,
Bridgeport has
caused,
allowed,
or threatened
the emission
of contaminants,
including
dust and
odors.
20.
By causing
or allowing
or threatening the emission
of contaminants,
so
as to
cause
or tend
to cause
air pollution
in
Illinois, whether alone or in
combination with
contaminants from
other sources,
or so as to
violate regulations
or standards
adopted
by the
Board,
Bridgeport has
violated Section
9(a)
of the Act,
415
ILCS 9(a)(2002),
and
Sections
212.461(b),
21 2.462(d)(1),
and
201.141
of the Board’s Air Pollution
Regulations,
35
III.
Adm.
Code 212.461(b),
21 2.462(d)(1),
and
201.141.
PRAYER FOR
RELIEF
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
People
of the
State
of Illinois,
prays
that the
Board:
A.
Authorize that
a hearing
be
held
in this matter
at which
time
Respondent,
Bridgeport Grain
Company,
be required
to
answer the allegations herein;
5

B.
Find the Respondent to
have
violated the Act and
regulations as
alleged
herein;
C.
Order the Respondent to
cease
and
desist from further violations
of
the Act and
associated
regulations;
D.
Assess
against the Respondent a
civil penalty of fifty thousand dollars
($50,000.00)
allowed for each
of the violations of the Act
and
an
additional
penalty of ten
thousand
dollars
($10,000.00) for each
day during
which each
violation
has
continued
thereafter; and
E.
Grant such
other relief as
the
Board
may
deem
appropriate.
COUNT
II
PERMIT VIOLATIONS
1-13.
Complainant realleges
and
incorporates
herein
by paragraphs
1
through 13of
Count las paragraphs
1
through
13 of
this Count
II.
14.
Condition 5(b)
of Bridgeport
Grain’s
operation
permit
72111147
provides:
The permittee
shall implement
required housekeeping practices
and
maintain
a housekeeping check
list for the grain
elevator pursuant to
35
III,Adm.Code
212.461(b).
The check
list shall contain
the applicable
housekeeping practices
described
in the “Minimum
Recommendations for Housekeeping Practices for
Grain
Handling
Facilities.”
15.
Condition
6(a) of Bridgeport Grain’s operating
permit
72111147
provides:
(i)
Grain
receiving in
all
dump
pits
shall
be conducted
in accordance with
good
operating practice
to minimize particulate
matter emissions.
(ii)
Each
dump pit shall
be
inspected
for proper operation
while
receiving is
occurring at
least once each week
(Monday through Sunday) when grain
is
received.
16,
Condition 6(e) olBi-idgeport Grain’s operating
permit 72411147
provides:
(i)
Grain
load-out shall
be
conducted
with
sleeves extending
to within
at least 6
inches
below the
sides of the receiving
vehicle except for topping off.
6

(ii)
Grain
load-out sleeves shall
be inspected
for proper
qperation while
load out
is
occurring,
at least once
each week when
grain
load-out is performed.
17.
Condition
8(a)(i) of
Bridgeport Grain’s
operating permit
72111147 provides:
The permittee
shall
maintain
records
of,the following
items for the
grain elevator:
(i)
Records of housekeeping check
lists completed
by the elevator
manager.
18.
By failing
to comply with
the housekeeping
and
operating
practices as
required
by
Section
212.461(b) and
21 2.462(d)(1) of the Board’s Air Pollution
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code 212.461(b) and
212.462(d)(1),
and
by failing to
maintain
its
required housekeeping
checklist,
Bridgeport has
not complied
with
the terms of
its
operating permitjhat i&cundffions
5(b), 6(a), 6(e),
and
8(a)(i), and
has
thus violated
Section
9(b) of the Act,
415
ILCS
5/9(b)
(2002).
PRAYER FOR
RELIEF
WHEREFORE,
Complainant, People of the
State of Illinois,
prays
that
the
Board:
A.
Authorize that a
hearing
be held
in
this matter
at which time Respondent,
Bridgeport
Grain
Company,
be
required
to answer the allegations herein;
B.
Find
the Respondent to
have
violated
the Act and
regulations
as
alleged her&n;
C.
Order the Respondent to
cease and
desist from further violations
of
the Act,
associated
regulations,
and
permit conditions;
D.
Assess against the Respondent a
civil penalty of fifty thousand
dollars
($50,000.00)
allowed
for each
of the violations
of the Act and
an
additional
penalty of ten
thousand
dollars
($10,000.00) for each
day during which
each
violation has
contkmed
thereafter; and
7

E.
Grant such
other relief as
the
Board
may deem appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
PEOPLE
OF THE
STATE
OF ILLINOIS,
LISA
MADIGAN,
Attorney General of the
State
of
Illinois
MATTHEW
J.
DUNN, Chief
Environmental Enforcement/Asbestos
Litigation
Division
BY:____________________
THOMAS
DAVIS,
Chief
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Bureau
Of Counsel
PHILLIP
McQUILLAN
Senior Assistant Attorney General
500
South
Second Street
Springfield,
Illinois 62706
217/782-9031
Dated:
July
14,
2005
8

Back to top