1. NOTICE OF FILING
      2. RECE~V
      3. BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD c!F~’s
      4. PETITION FOR HEARING
      5. TO CONTEST SITE LOCATION APPROVAL
  1. Exhibit 1
      1. surrounding property.
      2. danger to the surrounding areafrom fire, spills, or other operational accidents.
      3. waste, an emergency response plan exists for the ‘facility which includes
      4. notzflcation, containment and evacuation procedures to be used in’ case ofan
      5. accidental release.
      6. Other Requirements ofSection 39.2 ofthe Act
  2. Exhibit 3
  3. 4
      1. MEMORANDUM
      2. station at 101-103 Sell Road in Des Plaines, Illinois.
      3. Disposal Management Systems, Inc.
  4. Exhibit 5
      1. Name ofApplicant:
    1. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
BEFORE THE
ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BO~~
~
js°PFIc~
M/~i~
2
4
2003
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN
)
STATE
OPIWNQIS
COOK COUNTY,
)
POllUtiOn Control
Board
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
No. PCB 03-
)
CITY OF DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS,
)
(Pollution Control Facility
)
Siting Facility)
Respondent.
)
NOTICE OF FILING
TO:
See Attached Proof ofService
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on March 24, 2003, we filed with the Illinois Pollution.
Control Board, nine copies and an original ofthe attached Solid Waste Agency ofNorthern Cook
County’s PETITION
FOR HEARING TO
CONTEST SITE
LOCATION APPROVAL
in
the above entitled matter.
SOLID
WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN
COOK COUNTY
By:___
On
ofIts Attorneys
)
Patricia F.
Sharkey
Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw
190 South LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL
60603
312-782-0600
Attorney Registration No. 6181113
THIS DOCUMENT
IS FILED ON RECYCLED
PAPER
RECE~V
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
c!F~’s
MAR
2
4
,~
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN
)
STATE
OFIL~j~~
COOK COUNTY,
)
POllUtiOn Controj ~
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
No. PCB 03-/
)
CITY OF DES PLAINES, ILLINOIS,
)
(Pollution Control Facility
)
Siting Facility)
Respondent.
)
PETITION FOR HEARING
TO CONTEST
SITE LOCATION APPROVAL
Petitioner Solid Waste Agency ofNorthern Cook County
(“SWANCC”) by Mayer,
Brown, Rowe &
Maw, its
attorneys, respectfully requests a hearing to contest the decision ofthe
City ofDes Plaines, Illinois (“City’) approving the siting ofthe proposed Disposal Management
Systems, Inc.
(“DMS”) Transfer Facility (“DMS Facility”).
In support of this Petition,
SWANCC states as follows:
1.
This
Petition is filed pursuant to Section 40.1(b) of the Illinois Environmental
Protection
Act (the
“Act”)
(415
ILCS
5/40.1).
2.
On August
5,
2002, DMS submitted its request for site location approval to the
City ofDes Plaines.
The DMS request proposes to locate a waste transfer station on what is
described as a 200 ft by 200
ft facility site at
101-103 Sell Road in the City ofDes Plaines,
Illinois which is currently owned and operated by DMS as a construction and demolition debris
recycling center. The existing recycling center was not required to obtain
a permit issued by the
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency because it handles
only wastes which are at least
75
recyclable.
However, the proposed transfer station requires both an
Illinois Environmental
THIS DOCUMENT IS FILED ON
RECYCLED PAPER
Protection Agency
permit and pollution control facility siting approval under Section 39.2 of
the Act because it will be
allowed to handle waste without restriction as to the amount that is
recycled. The application
does not state the amount of waste anticipated to be handled or
recycled by the proposed transfer station on a daily or annual basis.
3.
On December 2, 2002, following service and publication of notice, a seven
minute hearing was conducted on the DMS siting application by the City of Des Plaines City
Council. No other public hearing was held on the DMS transfer station siting application.
4.
SWANCC was the sole public participant
in the December 2, 2002 hearing.
As is
reflected in the minutes of the December 2, 2002 City Council meeting, SWANCC’s
Executive
Director Brooke Beal presented testimony on behalfof SWANCC at the December 2, 2002
hearing. Mr. Beal also filed written comments on behalfofSWANCC during the subsequent
public
comment period. A true and correct copy of the minutes ofthe December 2, 2002 City
Council meeting is
attached hereto as Exhibit
1. A true and
correct copy ofthe written comments
filed by SWANCC on December 31, 2002
is attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
5.
On February
18, 2003, the City of Des Plaines City Council approved the siting ofthe
DMS Facility, without conditions, as is reflected in
the attached minutes ofthe City Council
meeting.
A true and
correct copy ofthe February
18,
2003
City Council
Meeting Minutes
approving the siting of the DMS Facility is
attached hereto as Exhibit 3.
In response to a
Freedom ofInformation Act request requesting a copy ofthe “final written decision,” the City of
Des Plaines stated:
“Attached is a certified copy ofthe minutes of the February
18, 2203
meeting of the Des Plaines City Council at which the City Council voted
to approve the transfer station application (page7). Also attached is a copy
of the Certification of Siting Approval (LPC-PA8), signed by Mayor
Anthony W. Arredia and attested by City Clerk Donna McAllister. A letter
will be sent to
Disposal Management
Systems, Inc. the week ofMarch 24,
2
2003, along with the Certification, describing the conditions of approval.
A copy will
be sent to
SWANCC.”
A true and correct copy of a March 21, 2003
memorandum from Ruth Broder, City of
Des Plaines Community Development Coordinator, included with the City ofDes Plaines March
21, 2003
FOIA response is attached hereto as Exhibit 4.
A true and correct copy ofthe Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency form LPC-PA8 titled “Certification ofSiting Approval”
signed by Anthony W. Arredia, Mayor of the City ofDes Plaines, on March
3, 2003
is
attached
hereto as Exhibit
5.
6.
SWANCC is an Illinois not-for-profit unit oflocal government which was formed
in
1988 under the Illinois
Intergovernmental Cooperation Act.
Its membership includes 23
Cook
County municipalities.
SWANCC participated in the public hearing conducted by the City of
Des Plaines on December 2, 2002,
and therefore has standing to
contest this siting approval
pursuant to
Section 40.1
(b) ofthe Act.
7.
SWANCC contests and objects to the City ofDes Plaines’ decision to approve the
siting ofthe DMS Facility because the siting process and procedures used by the City of
Des Plaines in reaching that decision were fundamentally unfair.
8.
SWANCC further contests the City ofDes Plaines’ siting approval because it is
wholly unsupported by the record and
is against the manifest weight of the evidence.
9.
SWANCC further contests the City ofDes Plaines siting approval because its
siting procedures failed to produce a sufficient record for review and otherwise failed to meet the
requirements ofthe Act.
3
WHEREFORE, SWANCC
respectfully requests that the Board enter an order (a)
setting
for hearing this
contest of the City ofDes Plaines’ siting approval decision, (b) reversing the City
ofDes Plaines’ siting approval decision, and (c) providing such other and further relief as the
Board deems appropriate.
Dated:
March 24, 2003
Respectfully submitted,
SOLID
WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN
COOK COUNTY
By:________
One
fIts Attorneys
)
Patricia F.
Sharkey
Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw
190 South LaSalle Street
Chicago, IL
60603
312-782-0600
Attorney Registration No. 6181113
FirmNo.: 38918
4

Back to top

Exhibit
1
MINUTES
OF
THE
REGULAR
~ETING
OF
THE
CITY
COUNCIL
OF
THE
CITY
OF
DES
PLAINES,
ILLI14OIS
HELD
IN
THE
ELZP.~OR
ROHPBACH
~NORIAL
COUNCIL
CHA~ERS,
DES
PLAINES
CIVIC
CENTER,
MONDAY,
DECE~ER 2,
2002
CALL
TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the City Council of the
City
of
Des
Plaines,
Illinois,
was
called
to
order
by
Mayor
Anthony W. Arredia at 7:00
p.m. in the Eleanor Rohrbach
Memorial Council Chambers,
Des
Plaines Civic
Center on
Monday, December
2,
2002.
ROLL CALL:
Roll
call
indicated
the
following
aldermen present:
Beauvais, Christiansen, Murphy, Sayad, Brookman,
Becker,
Smith, Argus.
Also present
were:
City Manager Miller,
Assistant
City Manager-EDC
Director Schneider,
Director of Finance Egeberg, Police Chief Ryan, Fire
Chief Farinella, Director of Engineering Oakley, Director of Public Works
Dusckett,
Director
of Human
Resources
&
Services
Merriman,
Assistant
Director of
Human
Resources
&
Services
Bajor,
Director of
Emergency
Communications Ornberg, Assistant City Attorney Bartel and City Attorney
Wiltse.
PRAYER
?.?~D
The opening prayer was given by City Clerk McAllister,
PLEDGE:
followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
RECOGNITION:
Mayor
Arredia
and
Alderman
Sayad
recognized
those
students
and teachers
who
participated in
the
recent
Muscular Dystrophy Walk—A-Thon to raise money for their
summer
camp;
a
representative
from
the
Muscular
Dystrophy Association accepted a check in the amount of
$950 from the students and in return presented them with
a plaque of appreciation.
PUBLIC
MINUTES
OF
THE
PUBLIC
HEARING
HELD
IN THE
BEARING!
ELEANOR ROHRBACH
MEMORIAL COUNCIL
CHAMBERS,
TRANSFER
DES PLAINES CIVIC CENTER, MONDAY, DECEMBER 2,
STATION/lOl—
2002
103 SELL RD.:
CALL
TO
Mayor Arredia called the Public Hearing to order at 7:12
ORDER:
p.m.
The
Public Hearing was being
held
pursuant to
legal notice to obtain public comment on the application
by
Disposal Management
Systems,
Inc.,
For
a
Transfer
Station Permit for
a facility to be located at 101-103
SellRoad.
DISCUSSION:
Director
of
Economic
Development
Schneider
reviewed
request from Disposal Management Systems,
Inc. for a new
permit from the State of Illinois that would allow them
to operate as a Transfer Station rather than a recycling
facility;
by
operating
as
a
transfer
station,
the
company could accept
loads of materials containing less
than
75
of materials that can be recycled;
currently
the
company
must
send
all
loads
they
receive
that
contain
less than
75
recyclable material directly
to
the
landfill.
Mr.
C.
Brooke
Beal,
Executive
Director,
Solid
Waste
Agency of Northern Cook County,
1616
E.
Golf Road,
Des
Plaines,
addressed
the
City
Council
stating
their
opposition to this request;
they have not demonstrated
a
need;
there
are other places that could accept this
material.
Petitioner Rick Anderson,
Disposal Management
Systems,
Inc.,
addressed
the
City
Council
stating
that
this
facility
serves
a great need for the surrounding area;
they recycle construction debris; very few facilities do
that;
this facility is located and operated in a manner
12/2/02
PAGE TWO
PUB. HEARING
that
will
protect
the
public’s
health,
safety
and
(Cont’d.)
welfare.
Mayor Arredia asked for public comment.
There was none.
The Public Hearing was adjourned at 7:19 p.m.
The City Council reconvened at 7:20 p.m.
PUBLIC
MINUTES
OF
THE
PUBLIC
HEARING
HELD
IN
THE
HEARING!
ELEANOR ROHRBACH MEMORIAL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
2002
TAX
DES PLAINES CIVIC CENTER, MONDAY, DECEMBER
2,
LEVY:
2002
CALL
TO
Mayor Arredia called the Pubic Hearing to order at
7:21.
ORDER:
p.m.
The Public
Hearing was
being held pursuant
to
legal notice to discuss
the proposed property
tax
levy
increase for
the City
of Des Plaines for 2002
tax year
levy,
in
the amount of $18,786,274,
which represents
a
15.3
increase over the previous year.
DISCUSSION:
Director
of
Finance Egeberg stated that
the
amount of
the
tax
levy
can
be
adjusted
when
this
matter
is
discussed on December
3,
2002.
Mayor Arredia asked for public comment.
Mr. Vince Powers,
862 Webster Lane,
addressed the City
Council questioning why this matter
is on the Consent
Agenda; this is misleading to the
residents;
they think
it
is a done—deal.
Further
action
on
this
matter
under
Consent
Agenda,
Items
4
and 4a.
The Pu.bic Hearing was adjourned at 7:39 p.m.
The City Council reconvened at 7:40 p.m.
CITIZEN
Mr. Gary Danfield,
•655 River
Road,
addressed
the
City
PAP.TICIPA.:
Council
stating
his
concern
about
the
condition
of
Pearson Street;
we need•to
have that
Street finished
before the snow starts;
it
is very dangerous.
Mrs. Cathy Stashak,
1753 Whitcomb Avenue, address~dthe
City
Council
stating
she
is
a
retired
20—year
firefighter with the City of Des Plaines;
she is opposed
to
the
proposed
elimination
of
the
Fire
Prevention
Bureau;
it is
a highly skilled group which
acts
as
a
front—line defense for the firefighters.
ORDINANCE
Moved by Sayad,
seconded by Murphy, to POSTPONE
until
M-44-02
December
3,
2002,
discussion
on
the
First
Reading
of
TELECO~4UN.
Ordinance
M-44—02,
AN
ORDINANCE
REPEALING
TITLE
V,
TAX:
“BUSINESS REGULATIONS” CHAPTER 53,
“TELECOMMUNICATIONS
—
INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE
FEE”
IN
ITS
ENTIRETY,
AND
REPLACING
IT
WITH
TITLE
V1
“BUSINESS
REGULATIONS”
CHAPTER 53,
“TELECOMMUNICATIONS TAX” IN THE CITY OF DES
PLAINES CITY CODE, scheduled to be heard under Committee
of
the
Whole
later
in
the
meeting.
Motion declared
carried.
MANCAP.I
AUTO!
Moved by Smith,
seconded by Sayad,
to POSTPONE until
77 RAND RD.:
January
6,
2003,
the matter of the Business Development
Agreement
and
6(b)
Status
for Mancari Auto Group,
77
Rand Road,
scheduled to be discussed under Committee of
the
Whole
later
in
the
meeting.
Motion
declared
carried.
CONSENT
Alderman Sayad requested that Items
4,
4a,
20,
20a,
23
AGENDA:
arid
23a
be removed from the Consent Agenda;
Alderman
Murphy requested that Items
5,
5a,
6,
6a,
7,
7a,
18,
18a,
19 and 19a; Alderman Brookman requested that Items
21,
2la,
25 and 25a be removed; Alderman Beauvais
The following comments are submitted in response to thetransfer station proposed
to be located at 101-103 Sell Road in Des Flames, Illinois. The facility is proposed
by
Disposal
Management
Systems,
Inc.
(“DMS”),
which
currently
operates
a
recycling
center
for
construction
and
demolition
debris
at
the
proposed
site.
SWANCC has reviewed the documents comprising the Application forlocal siting
approval per Section 39.2 of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act (the “Act”),
and
believes
that
the applicant
has ~
demonstrated
compliance
with
the nine
criteriaset forth by theAct. The Application is grossly inadequate and lacks critical
informationfor making any determination regarding thesuitability ofthe site foruse
as a solid waste transferstation. Therefore, SWANCC strongly recommends that the
City ofDes Plaines deny this application for local siting approval.
The Solid Waste Agency ofNorthern Cook County (“SWANCC”)is experienced in
the operations of solid waste transfer facilities, and is knowledgeable of theprocess
for obtaining local
siting apprpval in
Illinois.
SWANCC
was
formed
in
1988
to
manage the solid
waste needs of its 23
member towns. SWANCC
developed and
adopted a long-term solid waste management plan in
1991, and has sinceworkedto
implement
a
balanced
and
environmentally
safe
program
of
solid
waste
management.
SWANCC
owns
and
administers
the
operating
contract for
the
WheelingTownship TransferStation,
an 82,000-square foot state-of-the-artfacility
located in Gleñview.
Evaluation of the Application
DMS
is
requesting
approval to
convert its
existing
construction
and
demolition
(“C&D”) debris
recycling
facility into
a
solid
waste
transfer
station.
The
DMS
application
for
local
siting
approval
states
that
the
reason
for the
proposed
conversion is to allow the facilityto accommodate loads of C&D debris containing
less than 75
percent recyclable
materials. For reference, Section
22.38 of the Act
requires that facilities accepting exclusively general C&D debris for transfer shall
Solid
Waste
fgency of Ilorthern
Cook
County
1616
east
~oIf
F~oad
Des
Plaines,
llino~s60016
Phone
(847)
296-9205
Cl
I~ax(847)
296-9207
TY
CLERK’S OFFICE
flP~INES
VEc,~
L2002j
L!~!~
Proposed
Transfer
Station
by
Disposal
December 31, 2002
City of Des Plaines
1420 Miner/Northwest Highway
Des Flames, Illinois 60016-4498
Re:
Public
Comments
on
the
Management Systems
To the City of Des Plaines:
Members
/~rIingtonheights
8arr~n~tOn
~uffaIo ‘.3rove
~k
Orove
ViUage
evanston
~lencoe
Olenview
hoffman estates
Inverness
I’ceniluiorth
Lincoinwood
Morton ~rove
Mount Prospect
flUes
Palatine
Park F~idge
Prospect heights
~oIflng Meadows
Skokie
South
5arrington
Wheeling
VJH rnette
Wir.netka
c5eorge
Van
Dusen
Chaii-tnon,
Board of Dir~ctor~
F~onaldWietecha
Vice
(hairman,
Board of Directors
Wifliarn
R.
BalUng
5ecr’otaryflreasurer,
Board of Directors
Chair roan,
b~ecutive
Committee
C.
Eroolse Beal
B~ec
utivC Director
www.swancc.org
City ofDes Flames
Page
2 of
10
December 31, 2002
limit thepercentage
ofincoming non-recyclable general C&D debris to 25 percent or
less ofthe total incoming general C&D debris, as calculated on
a daily basis. Solid
waste transfer stations are not subject to
this limit. DMS claims that the change in
status from
a C&D transfer/recycling facility to a solid waste transfer facility is the
only proposedchange to the existing facility, and therefore no modifications
to the
design or operations
of the current facility are warranted.
_____
Des P1ames should be advised that while DMS commits
to accept all municipal
solid waste
(i.e., refuse or garbage), including waste from
residential and commercial sources, in the future. Even if the City were to
special
Solid
condition
its
approval
to
restrict
waste
acceptance to
solely
C&D debris,
this
V/aste
condition
could be modified
in
the future without
any further
public
process or
consideration
of the nine criteria. In addition, the Act provides that siting approval
~gency
maybe transferred to subsequent owners or operators, enabling others to develop the
property
for uses other than those proposed by DMS.
Section 39.2
(e-5) ofthe Act
states:
northern
C
Siting approval obtained pursuant to this Section is transferrable and may be
OO~i
transferred
to
a
subsequent
owner or operator.
In the
event that
siting
County
approval
has
been
transferred to
a
subsequent
owner
or operator,
that
subsequent
owner or operator
assumes
and
takes
subject to
any
an
all
conditions imposed upon the prior owner.oroperatorby thecounty board of
the
county or governing
body of themunicipality pursuant to subsection (e).
However,
any such
conditions
imposed pursuant
to
this
Section
may be
modified
by
agreement ‘between
subsequent
owner
or operator and
the
appropriate county boardorgoverning body.
Further, in the eventthat siting
approval
obtained
pursuant
to
this
Section
has
been
transferred
to
a
subsequent owner oroperator, that subsequent owneror operatorassumes all
rights and obligations and takes the facility subject to any and all terms and
conditions
of
any
existing
host
agreement
between
the
prior
owner
or
operator and
the
appropriate county board or governing body.
(emphasis
added)
For these reasons, the fullest level of compliance with the criteria set forth
by, the
Act should be expected ofany applicant requesting approvalfora pollution control
facility.
As is
discussed below, the Applicant has failed to provide even minimal
documentation of compliance
with statutory criteria of Section 39.2. Approval of
DMS’
application would lower the
bar not only on the current application, but on
any future applications as well.
City of Des Flames
Page 3 of 10
December 31, 2002
Compliance with Section 39.2
of the Act
All
new pollution
control facilities
(including
transfer stations) proposed
to
be
located in Illinois are subjectto the requirements forlocal siting approval established
by Section 39.2 of the Act. Nine criteria are
set forth by Section 39.2 (a), which are
the exclusive factors which the City ofDes Flames
may consider
in determining
whether to grant siting approval. Section 39.2 (a) requires applicantsforlocal siting
________
approval to submitsufficient details describing the proposedfacility to demonstrate
______
compliance
with the
nine criteria,
and stipulates that local
siting approval shall be
granted only
if the
proposed
facility meets
the criteria.
The application
submitted by DMS
consists
solely of the following documents:
a
four-page narrative
description
of
the facility; a partially completedcopy of TEPA
form
LPC-PA8
(C6rtification
of
Siting
Approval);
and
a
plat
of
survey
and
topography.
No expert witness
testimony
was presented at the
public hearing on
December 2,
2002
to further
describe
the
design
and
operation
of the proposed
facility. Indeed, the only testimony presented was by SWANCC and, on rebuttal, by
an
owner of
DMS,
in
which
the
owner
agreed
with
the comments of SWANCC.
This record clearly does not demonstrate compliance with the ninecriteriaofSection
39.2.
Criterion 1
-
Thefacility is necessary to accommodate the waste needs ofthe area
it is
intended to serve.
As an initial
matter,
DMS has not identified a service areafor the proposed facility,
beyond stating that “this facility serves a great need for the surrounding area”.
No
documentary
evidencewas presented in therecord to indicate whether “surrounding
area” means
two feet, two miles
or2O miles. Because the service areais not defined,
theCity hasno basis to evaluate compliance with Criterion 1.
Furthermore,
DMS
has
not
demonstrated
that
the
facility
is
necessary
to
accommodate
the waste needs of the intended service area. DMS justifies the need
for the facility solely on the following observations:
•
Recycling C&D debris will save landfill space;
•
Operating the facility will improve the quality of life of citizens in
the area;
Recycling
C&D
debris
will eliminate
the
need
for construction
contractors to travel to
Elgin
to obtain gravel; and,
There are veryfew
facilities that recycle C&D debris.
City of Des Plaines
Page 4 of 10
December 31, 2002
DMS has not presented any evidence, however, to
support these observations. For
instance,
DMS
does not present a
list ofaggregate producers to demonstrate that the
only
alternative’ source of
gravel
(aside
from
its
proposed
outlet
for recovered
concrete in ElkGrove Village) is located in Elgin.
Moreover,
DMS
argues
that
there
are
few
other
facilities
that
are
capable
of
_______
providing
C&D
recycling service.
SWANCC
is aware of anumber of facilitiesin the
area that provide this service, including:
Groot Recycling and Disposal (transferstation located about 1/4 mile
southwest of
the proposed facility)
•
American
Wood
(C&D
processing
facility
located
in
Hoffman
Estates)
•
Vulcan Materials (located in Elk Grove Village)
Orange Crush
(located in
Chicago about
1/2
mile
southwest of the
proposed facility,
as well as locations in Skokie and Wheeling)
•
DuPage Materials (located in Elmhurst)
•
Crush
Crete (located in Addision)
Finally,
DMS
has
not
demonstrated that
its
objectives cannot
be
met under their
existing
permit for the recycling facility. DMS
appears to believe that
each load
which enters their facility must contain
75
percent or morerecyclable materials.This
is not
true. The requirement under Section 22.38 (b.2) ofthe Act is that the facility
shall “limit the percentage of
incoming
non-recyclable
general
construction or
demolition
debris
to
25
or less
of the
total
incoming
general
construction
or
demolition
debris,
as calculated on
a
daily
basis.”
DMS
presents
no data on
the
projected amount of material to
be handled, and therefore has not demonstrated a
need that it cannot meet its recycling objectives through its existing permit.
Criterion 2- Thefacility is so designed, located andproposed to be operated that
the public health, safety and welfare ‘will be protected.
DMS has notdemonstrated thatthe facilityis designed, locatedandproposed to be
operated in
a manner
which will protect the public health,
safety and welfare.
The
application merely states that the recycling facility has been operating for two years
whilebeing inspected by theIEPA, and sinceno changes are proposed, the criterion
has been met.
Clearly, however,
a significant change is being proposed
--
sincethe
modified
facility would
accept
loads
with
less
than
75
percent
recyclables, the
average daily quantity of waste handled at the facility would increase. No evidence
is
provided, however, to
indicate, the magnitude of the increase
and. whether the
.:facility is capable of handling increased volumes.
City ofDes Flames
‘
Page
5
of 10
December 31, 2002
The only drawing providedin the application is an undatedplat of surveywith hand-
written notes,
which
is
barely’legible
and
contains no
graphic
scale.
In
order
to
adequately
demonstrate
compliance
with
this
criterion,
substantial
additional
information would be requiredregarding the facility’s location, design,
and plan of
operations as described below.
description of the
facility location
is
needed, including
maps
and/or
figures.
The
nature
and
use of
surrounding
properties
should
be
identified.
In
addition, the location orpresence ofthefollowing features atornear the site needto
be investigated and clearly identified:
Nearest residentially zoned property and its distance to the subject
site
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
Section
22.14
of the
Act.
Section
22.14
requires
that
within
counties of at least 3,000,000
inhabitants no
person may establish a transfer station within
1,000
feet ofthe nearest property zonedforprimarily residential uses.Ifthe
facility
is
located within
10
contiguous
acres of property utilized
primarily forindustrial uses, thefacility maybe locatedwithin 1,000
feet, but
no
closer than
800
feet from
the nearest property zoned
primarilyfor residential uses.;
100-yearflood plain
(refer to discussion under Criterion 4);
•
Jurisdictional
waters
or
wetlands,
to
confirm
compliance
with
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act;
•
Historic, architectural or archaeological resources,
Threatened orendangered species;
Design
A detailed description of the design of the facility
is necessary to
evaluate if the
public
health,
safety,
and
welfare
will
be
protected.
Detailed
plans
should
be
provided, prepared to scale and in CAD or equivalent quality, showing theexisting
site conditions,
proposed site conditions,
traffic
movements,
and
building
floor
plans.
In addition, a description of the location,
size,
and design of the following
transfer station featuresshould be provided:’
Entrance, access roads, and interior circulation drives;
•
Scale and scale house;
Transfer station building;
•
‘Waste tipping floor;
Waste sorting and/or processing areas;
Waste orrecyclables storage areas;
City ofDes Plaines
Page 6 of 10
December 31, 2002
•
Waste loading bays;
•
Vehicle queuing lanes;
•
Security features such as fencing and gates;
•
Employee and visitor parking areas;
•
‘
Utilities;
•
Stormwater management structures;
Fire control systems;
Signage
and
•
Landscaping.
In addition, DMS
notes
in their response
to
Criterion
5
that
a containment dike
exists around the waste sorting operation. The nature of this dike needs to be more
thoroughly described, including location,
size, purpose, and method of treatment
and/or discharge.
‘
Operations
A plan of operations
for the transfer station
facility should
be
provided, which
includes information on the following:
.
•
Waste types;
•
Waste quantity projections;
•
Methods for transferring waste;
•
Demonstration
that
facility
can
accommodate
projected
waste
quantity without causing backups onto exterior roadways or unsafe
site conditions;
•
‘
Equipment needs;
‘
•
Personnel needs;
•
Hours of operation;
•
Cleaning procedures;
Methods to
control nuisances such as dust, noise,
odors, litter, and
vectors;
•
Communication system;
•
Record keeping system; and,
•
Vehicle fueling procedures.
DMS intends to accept loads withalowerrecyclables content-- i.e.,ahigher content
of non-recyclable solid
waste.
DMS
does
not
indicate how
long
the
increased
volume ofnon-recyclable solid waste materials will remain on-site prior to transport
to
a disposal facility. Moreover, DMS
does not indicate the types and amounts of
waste
that will
be
stored at the facility or the duration that
they
will
be
stored,
City ofDesPlaines
Page 7 of 10
December 31,2002
beyond stating “becauseofthe small size of this facility,
wecannot and do not store
large amounts ofanyone materialfor long periodoftime.” Aswas notedbefore, the
volume ofmaterial handled at the site will likely increase, because incremental loads
with less than 75 percent recyclables
will be
handled.
Although DMS
has
acknowledged that it is a small facility, it has not demonstrated that its “small”
facility
can safely accommodate additional waste volumes.
Criterion
3
-
The facility is
located so as
to
minimize
incompatibility
with
the
_______
character ofthe surrounding area and to minimize the effect on the value ofthe
surrounding property.
DMS
has
not demonstrated
that the
facility
is
located
so
as
to
minimize
incompatibilitywith the character ofthesurrounding areaandto minimize theeffect
on the value of
the surrounding property.
Additional
documentation
(drawings,
maps, and photographs)
is warranted to fully characterize the land-uses in the
surrounding area. A zoningmapshould be providedforthe areas within ahalf-mile
to mile radius of the
site.
In addition, any site features such as fencing and
landscapingthatmay serve to screen operations fromadjacent properties should be
designedand/or identified.
Criterion 4
-
The facility
is located outside the
boundary
ofthe
100 yearflood
plain
or the site is flood-proofed.
DMS has not demonstrated that the facility is located outside
the boundary of the
100 year flood plain or that the site
is flood-proofed. The application merely states
that
the
facility
is
not
located
within
the flood
plain,
without
any
supporting
documentation. The appropriate
panel of the Cook County Flood Insurance Rate
Map (FIRM), published by the Federal EmergencyManagement Agency (FEMA),
should be ‘utilized in conjunction with a
site topographic
survey to determine the
location ofthe 100 year flood plain. At aminimum, the application should
include
copies of such maps with the site location
identified.
Criterion 5
-
The plan ofoperations for the facility is designed to minimize
the
danger to the surrounding areafrom fire, spills, or other operational accidents.
DMS has not demonstrated that theplan ofoperations forthe facility is designed to
minimize
the danger to the surrounding area from fire,
spills, or other operational
accidents.In addition to the items identifiedunder Criterion 2 as critical components
of
the
facility’s
operating
plan,
the
following
items
should
be
addressed
to
demonstrate compliance
with this
criterion:
Employee training program;
Fire control and prevention mechanisms;
City ofDes Plaines
Page 8 of 10
December 31, 2002
Spill
prevention and response plan;
Loading checking program (to prevent unauthorized materials from
being accepted by the facility);
•
Site security measures;
•
Emergencyresponse procedures; and,
•
Operational contingency plans.
______
Criterion
6~
Th; trffic
patterns to
or
from the facility are so designed as
to
DMS
has not demonstrated
that the traffic
patterns to
or from
the facility are so
designed as to minimize theimpact on existingtraffic flows.The statementbyDMS
that
traffic flows
are
not
expected
to
change
appreciably
is
not
sufficient
to
demonstrate compliance with this criterion. A traffic study should be prepared by an
experienced transportation engineer and include
at a minimum the following
information:
Identification
of the
roadway
network
to
be
used
to access the
proposed transfer station;
Analysis of the traffic generated by the facility, including number
and type of vehicle per each hour ofoperating day and the direction
bywhich traffic will enter and exit the facility;
Assessment
of
the
existing
roadway
network,
including
traffic
volumes,
approved
or
planned
developments
or
roadway
improvements, and accident data;
•
Evaluation of the impact ofthe site generated trafficon the
existing
roadways,
including
compliance
with
weight restrictions
and the
projected level ofservice and vehiculardelay atcritical intersections;
Review
of
proposed
site plan
in
conjunction
with
the projected
traffic
volumes
and
known turning radii of vehicles
utilizing
the
transfer station.
Confirm that the proposed entrance configuration
and
interior
traffic
movements
will
adequately
and
safely
accommodate waste collection and transfer vehicles.
Criterion
7
-
If the facility will
be treating, storing or disposing ofhazardous
waste,
an
emergency
response
plan
exists
for
the
‘facility
which
includes
notzflcation,
containment and evacuation
procedures to be
used
in’ case ofan
accidental release.
DMS proposes that the facility will not accept orstore hazardous waste. However,
DMS’ conclusion that an emergency responseplan is not required is untrue..Such a
plan is required (under Criterion
2 or Criterion
5
if not Criterion 7) to address the
handling of asbestos materials which may be delivered to the facility, or fuel spills
from trucks
amid ‘operating equipment.
‘
‘
City ofDesFlames
‘
Page 9 of 10
December 31, 2002
Criterion 8- Ifthe facility is to be located in a county where the county boardhas
adopted
a
solid
waste
management
plan
consistent
with
the
planning
requirements ofthe Local Solid Waste Disposal Act or the Solid Waste Planning
and Recycling Act, the facility is consistent with that plan.
DMS has not demonstrated that the proposed transfer station facility is consistent
with the applicable solid waste management plan. Cook County adopted a Solid
Waste Management~Plan
in
1996, and updated the Plan in 2000. While the
application states
that recycling is
an important goal of the County, DMS
has not
demonstrated a comprehensive understanding ofthe Plan. Additional information is
warranted
to demonstrate compliance with the Plan, including:
Identificationofthekeyobjectives of thePlan, specificallythose that
relate to solid waste transfer stations
and recycling facilities;
Demonstration that theproposed facilitymeets each ofthe objectives
identified.
Criterion 9-If the facility will be located within a regulated recharge area, any
applicable requirements specified by the Boardfor such areas have been met.
Regulated recharge areas
are
established by the Illinois Pollution Control Board to
protect areas where the groundwater is particularly susceptible to contaminationdue
to
local
geology.
To
properly demonstrate compliance with
this
criterion,
DMS
should provide evidencefrom the illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA)
that the facility is not located within a regulated recharge area.
Other Requirements ofSection
39.2 ofthe Act
Section 39.2 (b) of the Act requires the Applicant to provide written notice of the
request for location approval (via personal service or registered
mail) to property
owners within
250
feet of the
subject property
and
to
members of the
General
Assembly from the legislative district in which
the proposed facility is located. In
addition, notice
must be published in a newspaper of general circulation in
Cook
County.
Section 39.2 (d) ofthe Act requires that notice ofthe public hearingbe provided(via
certified mail) to members of theGeneral Assembly fromthe legislative district in
which
,the
proposed’ facility
is
located,
to
the
governing
authority
of
every
municipalitycontiguous to the proposed site or contiguous to DesPlaines,to Cook
County, and to the IEPA. Notice must also be published in a newspaper of general
circulation in Cook County.
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘.
City ofDes Flames
‘
Page
10 of 10
December 31, 2002
The
notices
are’
required to be submittedno later than 14 days prior to the filing of
the
request
for ‘siting
approval or the
date of public
hearing, respectively.
No
evidence
has
been
provided
that
all
of
the
required
notices
were is,sued in
compliance with the Act.
Summary
_______
In
summary,
DMS
has
not
provided
sufficient
information
to
demonstrate
compliance with Section 39.2 ofthe Act. The application is clearlylacking in critical
details,
making it impossible
to
properly evaluate it for use’ as
a
transfer
station
facility.
‘
‘
‘
‘
Sincerely,
C. Brooke Beal
Executive Director

Back to top

Exhibit
3
STATE OF ILLINOIS
)
)
COUNTY
OF
COOK
)
CLERK’ S
CERTIFICATE
I,
DONNA McALLISTER,
do
hereby certify
that
I
am the
qualified and acting CITY CLERK* of the City of Des Plaines, Cook
County,
Illinois,
AND
THAT
AS
SUCH,
I
am
the
officer
duly
designated
by law to keep the minutes, ordinances,
resolutions and
proceedings
of the City Council of the City of Des Plaines.
I
further certify
that the attached and foregoing copy
of
~
~
e~
~
—
V~e
\m
‘N~
~
0 C)~
is
a true and correct copy of the records of the City of Des Plaines.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
I hereunto
affix my signature
and
impress hereon the corporate seal of the said City of Des Plaines,
Cook County,
Illinois, this~~-H”~-day
of
hc—’t4ck
,
2003.
DONNA McALLISTER, City Clerk
City of Des P
ines, County of Cook
By:
/~2~
NANCY P~ERSON, Deputy City Clerk
City ofVDes Plaines, County of Cook
*per the provisions
of
65 ILCS 5/3.1-20-5
of the Illinois Compiled Statutes
(1998)
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR
~ETING
OF THE CITY
COUNCIL
OF
THE
CITY
OF
DES
PLAINES,
ILLINOIS
HELD
IN
THE
ELEANOR
ROHRBACH
~.1EMORIAL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS,
DES
PLAINES
CIVIC
CENTER,
TUESDAY,
FEBRUARY
18,
2003
CALL
TO
ORDER:
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Des
Plaines,
Illinois,
was
called
to
order
by
Mayor
Anthony W. Arredia at 6:15 p.m. in the Eleanor Rohrbach
Memorial Council Chambers,
Des
Plaines Civic
Center on
Tuesday,
February
18,
2003.
ROLL
CALL:
Roll
call
indicated
the
following
aldermen present:
Murphy, Sayad,
Becker, Smith, Argus.
Aldermen Beauvais,
Christiansen
and
Brookman
were
absent.
Alderman
Christiansen arrived
at
6:17
p.m.
Alderman
Brookman
arrived
in
Executive
Session
at
6:50
p.m.
Alderman
Beauvais arrived at 7:41 p.m.
Also present were: Acting City Manager—EDC Director Schneider,
Director
of Finance Egeberg,
Police Chief Ryan,
Fire Chief Farinella,
Director of
Engineering Oakley, Director of Public Works Dusckétt, Director of Human
Resources
& Services Merriman, Assistant Director of Human Resources
&
Services Bajor,
Director of Emergency Communications Ornberg,
Keep
Des
Plaines Beautiful’ Coordinator Wolski, Assistant City Attorney Bartel and
City Attorney Wiltse.
EXECUTIVE
SESSION:
Moved by Sayad,
seconded by Murphy, to go into Executive
Session
to discuss
collective
bargaining.
Upon roll
call,
the vote was:
AYES:
5—Murphy,
Sayad,
Becker,
Smith, Argus
NAYS:
0-None
ABSENT:
3-Beauvais, Christiansen, Brookman
Motion declared carried.
The City Council recessed at 6:16 p.m.
The City Council reconvened at 7:00 p.m.
PRAYER AND
PLEDGE:
PRESENTATION:
Roll
call
indicated
the
following
aldermen
present:
Christiansen,
Murphy,
Sayad,
Brookman,
Becker,
Smith,
Argus.
The opening prayer was given by Pastor Greg Eaton,
First
United
Methodist
Church,
followed
by
the
Pledge
of
Allegiance.
Mayor Arredia presented the The Year of the Family Award
to Al Alderman,
who has
been an inspiration to not only
his children and scout troop,
but to his family and the
community at large.
Mayor
Arredia
introduced
Rev.
William
Grice,
First
Congregational
Church,
who
in
turn
introduced
Debra
Wielusiak,
the new Community Resource
Director for the
Self—Help
Closet
&
Pantry
of
Des
Plaines,
who
urged
residents to contribute food and clothing because there
is
a growing need in
Des Plaines.
Alderman Tom Becker introduced Keep Des Plaines Beautiful
Coordinator Woleki who presented appreciation awards to
businesses who contributed to the Holiday Ceremony at the
Library
Plaza
on
December
5,
2003;
and
to
schools
who
created ornaments and decorated the holiday
trees:
Grazie!
Ristorante and Banquets
Optimist Club of Des
Plaines
Sysco Food Service
U-STOR-IT
Algonquin Middle School
Brentwood Elementary School
Central Elementary School
Chippewa Middle School
Cumberland Elementary School’
Iroquois Community School
North Elementary School
Orchard Place Elem.
Schooa
Our Lady of Destiny School
Plainfield Elem.
School
£tU¼~lSa
A.
~
CITIZEN
PARTICIPA
COLLECTIVE
BARGAININGJ
POLICE
(MAP.L
CHAPTER
Z82
Resolution
R—21—03
Ordinance
H—8—03
South Elementary School
SPARKS Program
(Dis.
62)
St.Emily
Elem.
School
Terrace Elementary School
Mrs. Stacey Magnusson, President of the Optimist Club of
Des Plaines,
rea,d a letter from the Optimist Club stating
that they will donate all seventeen
(17)
trees
for the
2003 holiday season at Library Plaza.
Mr.
Michael
Mickelsen,
Des
Plaines
Citizens
for
Responsible
Development,
P.O.
Box
2760,
Des
Plaines,
addressed the City Council stating that his organization
has looked into the flooding issue; they have contacted
other communities to see what they are doing;
permeable
payers are being used to construct parking lots;
he has
a
lot of information that he would be willing to loan to
the City; we should require that all large parking lots
and driveways be constructed with permeable payers.
Mr.
Bob
Suriano,
1258 Wayne
Drive,
addressed
the City
Council stating that there is a problem with cars going
the
wrong
way
down Graceland Avenue;
there
should be
better
signage;
when the Police stop cars
on Golf Road
at River
Road,
they should pull off into
a parking lot
rather
than block traffic;
when
cars
are
involved
in
accidents, they should be pulled off the road so traffic
can go through.
Mr.
Gary Danfield,
655 River
Road,
addressed the
City
Council stating that the City should not accept
gifts
from the Optimist Club until they clean up after their
Christmas Tree sale; we should look at allowing them to
use
City
property;
they
don’t
maintain
the
property
properly.
Moved
by
Becker,
seconded
by
Sayad,
to
concur
with
majority agreement in Executive Session that City ratify
contract with the Metropolitan Alliance of Police
(MAP)
Chapter #282
(E—’911), effective May 1, 2002 through April
30,
2005;
and
adopt
Resolution
R-21-03,
A
RESOLUTION
RATIFYING AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
EXECUTE
THE
COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING AGREEMENT WITH
THE
METROPOLITAN ALLIANCE
OF
POLICE,
DES
PLAINES CIVILIAN
CHAPTER #282.
Alderman Argus stated that a 5.5
increase in wages plus
steps is irresponsible in this bad economy and the state
of our budget.
Upon roll call,
the vote was:
AYES:
7—Beauvais,
Christiansen,
Murphy,
Sayad,
Brookman,
Becker,
Smith
NAYS:
1-Argus
ABSENT:
0-None
Motion declared carried.
Moved by Becker,
seconded by
Sayad,
to place on
First
Reading
Ordinance
M-8-03.
Motion
declared
carried.
Alderman Argus voted no.
Moved by Becker, seconded by Christiansen, to advance to
Second Reading and adopt Ordinance M—8-03, AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING SCHEDULE VII “TELECOMMUNICATION OPERATORS GROUP”
OF TITLE
I,
“ADMINISTRATIVE,” OF CHAPTER
15,
“POSITION
CLASSIFICATION
AND
COMPENSATION
PLAN,”
OF
SECTION
4,
“CLASSIFICATION
PLAN TO
THE
CITY’ SERVICE,” OF THE
DES
PLAINES
‘CITY
CODE
TO REFLECT
AMENDMENTS
MADE
IN
THE
AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE
MAY
1, 2002 THROUGH APRIL
30,
2005.
Upon roll call, the vote was:
AYES:
7—Beauvais,
Christiansen,
Murphy,
Sayad,
Brookman,
Becker,
Smith
NAYS:
1-Argus
ABSENT~0-None
Motion declared carried.
PRESENTATION
(Cont’ d.)
Devonshir.e Elementary School
Forest Elementary School
Friendship Jr.
High School
Immanuel Lutheran School
U~v
THREE
MOTOR
FUEL
Moved by Beauvais,
seconded by
Brookman,
to
TABLE the
TAX
INCREASE
matters
of Motor Fuel Tax Increase and Telecommunication
& TELECO~4M.
Tax
Increase,
scheduled
to
be
discussed
under
New
TAX
INCREASE:
Business later
in the meeting.
Motion declared carried.
MANCABI
AUTO
Moved by Smith,
seconded by Becker,
to
POSTPONE
until
GROUP!
April
7,
2003,
the matter of the Business Development
77
RAND
ROAD:
Agreement and the 6(b)
status for Nancari Auto Group,
77
Rand Road,
scheduled to be discussed under Committee of
the Whole later in the meeting.
Motion declared carried.
CONSENT
Alderman Sayad requested that Item 2 be removed from the
AGENDA:
Consent Agenda; Alderman Beauvais requested that Items
4 ‘and 4a be removed; and a resident requested that Items
6 and 6a be
removed.
Moved
by
Sayad,
seconded
by
Becker,
to
establish
a
Consent Agenda
except
for
Items
2,
4,
4a,
6
and
6a.
Motion declared carried.
Moved
by
Murphy,
seconded
by
Sayad,
to
approve
the
Consent Agenda.
Upon roll call,
the vote was:
AYES:
8—Beauvais, Christiansen,
Murphy,
Sayad,
Brookman,
Becker, Smith, Argus
NAYS:
0-None
ABSENT: 0-None
Motion declared carried.
Minutes were approved;
staff
recommendations
and requests were approved;
Ordinances
M—4—03,
M—5—03,
M—6—03,
M—7—03,
T—1—03
and
Z—3—03
be
adopted; Ordinances M—9—03 and T—3—03 be placed on First
Reading; and Resolutions R-23--03 and R-24-03 be adopted.
MINUTES!
Moved by Murphy,
seconded by Sayad,
to approve minutes
1/22/03:
of the Special meeting of the City Council held January
Consent
22,
2003,
as
published.
Motion
declared
carried
as
Agenda
approved unanimously under Consent Agenda.
MINUTES!
Moved by
Sayad, seconded by Brookman,
to POSTPONE until
2/3!03:
March
3,
2003,
under Unfinished
Business,
approval
of
minutes of the regular meeting of the City Council held
February 3, 2003, as published.
Motion declared carried.
DRIVING
Moved by Murphy,
seconded by Sayad,
to concur with Staff
RESTRICTIONS:
recommendation to amend Title
X, Chapter
9
—
“Licenses”
Consent
of
the
City
Code
to ~
a
NEW
Section
9
to
make
it
Agenda
unlawful
to
drive
without
a
license
or
drive
on
a
suspended
license; the minimum
fine upon conviction or
Ordinance
plea
of
guilty shall be
$50;
and further recommend
to
M-9-03
place
on
First
Reading Ordinance
M-9-03,
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF DES PLAINES, TITLE
X,
“TRAF~’IC”CHAPTER
9, “LICENSES” TO ADD A NEW SECTION
9,
TITLED
“PENALTY
FOR DRIVING
WITHOUT A LICENSE,
OR
DRIVING ON A SUSPENDED LICENSE.”
Motion declared carried
as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda.
LIQ. LIC./
Moved by
Smith,
seconded by
Becker,
to POSTPONE until
1415
March
3,
2003,
under Committee of the Whole,
discussion
ELLINWOOD:
on amending Title
V, ,Chapter
34,
Section
18
-
“License
Limitations” of
the City Code to ~Q
one
(1)
Class 3-1
Ordinance
Bulk Sales
Dealers Liquor License for property located
M—1O—03
at 1415 Ellinwood Street, d/b/a Sofia Specialty Food arid
Liquors;
contingent upon verification
of
fingerprints;
and
one
(1)
Class
B
Liquor
License
(umbrella
classification for all B Liquor Licenses);
and placing
on
First
Reading Ordinance
M—l0—03.
Motion
declared
•carried.
TRAFFIC
Moved
by
Murphy,
seconded
by
Sayad,
to
concur
with
RESTRICTION!
recommendation
of Staff
Traffic Advisory Committee to
PERRY ST.:
amend Title
X,
Chapter 7,
Section
3
—
“Stop Streets” of
Consent
the City Code to ADD that westbound Perry Street traffic
Agenda
stop at Graceland Avenue;
and further recommend to place
on First Reading Ordinance T-3-03, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
Ordinance
TITLE X,
“TRAFFIC” CHAPTER 7, “THROUGH AND STOP STREE7S”
T—3—03
T-3-03
SECTION
3
“STOP
STREETS”
TO •ADD
A
NEW
STOP
AT
THE’
(Cont’d.)
WESTBOUND LANE OF PERRY STREET.
Motion declared carried
as approved unanimously under Consent Agenda.
TIME EXTE~L1
Mr.
Gary
Danfield,
655
River
Road,
addressed
the
City
CONDIT. USE
Council asking why the City is giving them a six-month
& VARIATIO1L
extension.
Alderman Becker said because of 9/1/01; this
2930
RIVERi
is
a multi—million dollar project;
the hotel industry
took
a big hit.
Resolution
R-22-03
Moved by Becker,
seconded by Sayad, to concur with Staff
recommendation to grant request for extension of time for
preparation and
submittal of the Conditional Use Permit
and Variations
(as approved by the City Council on July
16,
2001
—
Ordinance Z—l2—Ol and amended by Ordinance Z—
2—02
on April
1,
2002),
from April
1,
2003
through and
including October
1,
2003;
for property located at 2930
S. River Road (Hilton Garden Inn); and further recommend
to adopt
ResolutionR-22-03,
A RESOLUTION GRANTING
AN
EXTENSION
OF
TIME
FOR
SUBMITTAL
AND
APPROVAL
OF
A
CONDITIONAL USE AND ZONING VARIANCES PURSUANT TO SECTIONS
3.4-8
“LIMITATIONS
ON
CONDITIONAL
USE”
AND
3.6-12
“LIMITATIONS
ON VARIATIONS”
OF THE
DES PLAINES
ZONING
ORDINANCE,
AND
GRANTING AN
EXTENSION
UNTIL OCTOBER
1,
2003,
LOCATED AT
2930
S.
RIVER ROAD,
DES
PLAINES
(CASE
Ol-22—CU—V)
.
Upon roll call, the vote
was:
AYES:
8—Beauvais,
Christiansen,
Murphy,
Sayad,
Brookman,
Becker,
Smith,
Argus
NAYS:
0-None
ABSENT:
0-None
Motion declared carried.
ATM
MACHINE
Moved by Murphy, seconded by Sayad,
to concur with Staff
PLACE. AGREE.
recommendation that Mayor and City Clerk be authorized
POLICE
STA.
to
execute
“Placement
Agreement”
with
Anderson
ATM
1420
MINER:
Systems,
4644
N. Leclare Avenue,
Chicago,
IL 60630,
to
Consent
place
an ATM Machine in the
lobby
of the
Des
Plaines
Agenda
Police Station, 1420 Miner Street; City to receive $1.20
per
transaction
at
said
ATM
machine;
and
further
Resolution
recommend
to
adopt
Resolution
R-23-03,
A
RESOLUTION
R-23-03
AUTHORIZING A “PLACEMENT AGREEMENT” BETWEEN ANDERSON ATM
SYSTEMS AND THE CITY OF DES PLAINES FOR THE
PURPOSE OF
PLACING AN ATM MACHINE IN THE LOBBY OF THE
DES PLAINES
POLICE STATION, LOCATED AT THE DES PLAINES CIVIC CENTER,
1420 MINER STREET.
Motion declared carried as approved
unanimously under Consent Agenda.
LOCKBOX BANK
Moved by Murphy, seconded by Sayad, to concur with Staff
ACCT. AGREE.I
recommendation that City Clerk be
authorized to execute
OAK
BROOK
“Corporate Authorization Resolution” with Oak Brook Bank,
BANK:
1400 W. l6~Street, Oak Brook,
IL 60523, to open a bank
Consent
•
account for lockbox service for utility bill and vehicle
Agenda
sticker payments; said resolution reaffirms the authority
of
the Director
of
Finance
and Assistant
Director
of
Resolution,
Finance to sign checks and make investments for the City;
R-24-03
and
further
recommend
to
adopt
Resolution
R-24-03,
A
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN OAK BROOK BANK
CORPORATE AUTHORIZATION
RESOLUTION
FOR
THE
PURPOSE OF
OPENING
A
BANK
ACCOUNT
AT
OAK
BROOK
BANK.
Motion
declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent
Agenda
LIp. LIC.
Moved by Murphy, seconded by Sayad, to concur with Staff
CHANGE OF
recommendation to approve Change of Ownership of Class
O’WNERSHIPL
B—i
Bulk
Sales
Dealers
Liquor
License
for
property
699 N. WOLF~
located at
699
N.
Wolf Road,
d/b/a
ZJ’s Pantry
Plus
&
Consent
Liquors;
contingent upon verification
of fingerprints.
Agenda
Motion declared
carried as approved unanimously under
Consent Agenda.
PAGE FIVE
PARKINGP~
Moved by Murphy, seconded by Sayad,
to
concur
with Staff
VARIATIONL
recommendation to grant request for Variation to Section
1660
S.
CORA:
4-7-9
of
the
Building
Code
Amendments,
to
permit
Consent
construction of
a pai~kingpad,
17’
wide x
21’
long,
in
Agenda
the rear yard
adjacent to the alley and detached garage
on
property located
at
1660
•S.
Cora
Street
(all
new
parking
pads
require
approval
by
the
Building
Code
Committee);
contingent upon petitioner agreeing not
to
construct any additional hard surface or
structures
in
the
rear
yard.
Motion
declared
carried
as
approved
unanimously under Consent Agenda.
BID AWAP.DJ
Moved by Murphy, seconded by Sayad, to concur with Staff
A~4BULANCE
recommendation
to
award bid
for
Purchase
of
Two
(2)
STRETCHERS~
Ambulance
Stretchers
to
the
single
bidder,
Armstrong
Consent
Medical
Industries,
575
Knightsbridge
Parkway,
Agenda
Lincolnshire,
IL
60069,
in
the
total
bid
amount
of
$5,904/Budgeted
Funds.
Motion
declared
carried
as
approved unanimously under Consent Agenda.
BID
AWAB~L
Moved by Murphy,
seconded by Sayad,
to concur with Staff
PRESSURE
recommendation to award bid for Purchase of Combination
WASHER
FOR
Cold/Hot/Steam
Pressure
Washer
for
Public
Works
PUBLIC
WKS.:
Department
to
the
lowest
responsible
bidder,
Standard
Consent
Industrial
&
Automotive,
6211 Church Road, Hanover Park,
Agenda
IL 60133,
in their alternate bid amount of
$8,935/2003
CERF
Fund.
Motion
declared
carried
as
approved
unanimously under Consent Agenda.
ADVERTISING
Moved by Murphy, seconded by Sayad, to concur with Staff
FOR BIP~
recommendation that City Clerk be authorized to advertise
Consent
for bids for
2003
Street Rehabilitation
(Contract
1),
Agenda
returnable by 3:00 p.m.,
Thursday, March
6, 2003.
Motion
declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent
Agenda.
APPOINTMENT:
Moved by Murphy, seconded by Sayad,
to approve Mayoral
Consent
appointment of Penny
C.
Wenstrom to the SPECIAL EVENTS
Agenda
COMMISSION,
term
to
expire
August
31,
2003.
Motion
declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent
Agenda.
ORDINANCE
Moved by Murphy,
seconded by
Sayad,
to adopt Ordinance
M-4-03
M—4-03, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE
I “ADMINISTRATIVE,”
POLICE
RECORD
OF CHAPTER
15 “POSITION CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION
SYS.
ADMIN.
PLAN,”
SECTION
4
“CLASSIFICATION
PLAN
TO
THE
‘CITY
(9—1-1):
SERVICE” FOR
SCHEDULE V—A
“TECHNICAL,
ENGINEERING
AND
Consent
INSPECTION GROUP” IN THE DES PLAINES CITY CODE.
Motion
Agenda
declared carried as
approved unanimously under
Consent
Agenda.
ORDINANCE
Moved by Murphy,
seconded by Sayad,
to adopt Ordinance
M-5-03
M-5-03,
AN
ORDINANCE
AUTHORIZING
THE
DONATION
AND
DONATION!
CONVEYANCE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE CITY OF DES
SURPLUS FIRE
PLAINES.
Motion declared carried as approved unanimously
EQUIPMENT:
under Consent Agenda.
Consent
Agenda
ORDINANCE
Moved by
Murphy,
seconded
by
Sayad,
to
adopt
Ordinance
M-6-03
M-6—03,
AN
ORDINANCE
RESCINDING
CITY
OF
DES
PLAINES
RESCINDING
MUNICIPAL
ORDINANCE
M—lO-02
IN
ITS
ENTIRETY.
Motion
ORDINANCE
declared carried as approved unanimously under Consent
14-10—02:
Agenda.
Consent
Agenda
‘
ORDINANCE
Moved
by Murphy,
seconded by Sayad,
to
adopt Ordinance
M-7—03
M-7-03, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE
I,
“ADMINISTRATIVE”
CITY CODE
CHAPTER
6,
“CITY
COUNCIL”
SECTION
3,
“MEETINGS”
TO
REVISIONS:
ADDRESS CERTAIN HOUSEKEEPING MATTERS (formerly 1-6-8 and
Consent
1-6-9).
Motion declared carried as approved unanimously
Agenda
under Consent Agenda.
ORDINANCE
•
Moved by Murphy, seconded by Sayad,
to adopt
Ordinance’
T-1-03
T-l-03, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE X, “TRAFFIC,” ‘CHAPTEB
PARKING
5, “STOPPING STANDING AND PARKING” SECTION 17,
“PARKING
RESTRICTIONL
PROHIBITED
IN
DESIGNATED
PLACES”
OF THE
CITY
OF
DES
FIFTH AVE.:
PLAINES CITY CODE.
Motion declared carried as approved
Consent
•
unanimously under Consent Agenda.
Agenda
ORDINANCE
Moved by Murphy, seconded by
Sayad,
to adopt Ordinance
Z-3-03
Z-3-03, AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLO~S
CONDIT. USE!
‘THE OPERATION OF A CLASS B RESTAURANT,
LOCATED AT 1526
1526 MINER:
MINER
STREET,
DES
PLAINES,
ILLINOIS,
(CASE
03-03-CU).
Consent
Motion
declared
carried
as
approved
unanimously
undex
Agenda
Consent Agenda.
ORDINANCE
Moved by Beauvais, seconded by Ch~istiansen, to advance
T—3-03
to
Second
Reading
and
adopt
Ordinance
T-3-03,
AK
TRAFFIC
ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE X, “TRAFFIC” CHAPTER 7,
“THROUGH
RESTRICTION!
AND STOP
STREETS”
SECTION, 3 “STOP STREETS” TO ADD A NEK
PERRY ST.:
STOP AT THE WESTBOUND LANE OF PERRY STREET.
Upon roll
call,
the vote was:
AYES:
8-Beauvais, Christiansen,
Murphy,
Sayad,
Brookman,
Becker, Smith, Argus
NAYS:
0-None
ABSENT: 0-None
Motion declared carried.
ORDINANCE
Moved by Sayad,
seconded by Becker,
to adopt Ordinance
14-9-03
M—9-03, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE OF THE CIT~
DRIVING
OF DES PLAINES, TITLE X, “TRAFFIC” CHAPTER 9, “LICENSES”
RESTRICTIONS:
TO ADD A
MEW
SECTION
9,
TITLED
“PENALTY
FOR
DRIVING
WITHOUT A LICENSE, OR DRIVING ON A SUSPENDED LICENSE.”
Upon roll call,
the vote was:
AYES:
8—Beauvais,
Christiansen, Murphy,
Sayad,
Brookman, Becker,
Smith, Argus
NAYS:
0-None
ABSENT:
0-None
Motion declared carried.
MAYOR ARREDIA DECLARED
THAT THE CITY COUNCIL WAS NO~
RESOLVED INTO A COMMITTEE OF TEE WHOLE
FINANCE
&
ADMINISTRATION
-
Alderman Sayad,
Chair
HEALTH
City
Attorney
Wiltse
reviewed the status of the meetings
INSURANCE
that
have
been
held
with
the
Staff
and
retirees
regarding
PREMIUMS!
health insurance premiums for retired City employees; the
RETIRED
CITY
matter had been postponed on
11/4/02,
11/18/02,
12/16/02
EMPLOYEES:
and 1/20/03; the City acknowledges that
37 retirees were
overcharged
in
the
total
amount
of
$19,704.89;
these
credits
will
be
off—set
against
monies
owed
by
the
retirees for the currently—due premiums.
Both
Alderman
Argus and Murphy stated that maybe the City
should
look
for
a
supplemental plan for Medicare for the
retirees;
Blue
Cross/Blue
Shield
‘should
explain
their
•
plan;
it
doesn’t
make
sense.
Director of Finance Egeberg stated that a supplemental
plan for Medicare for’the retirees would cost the City
approximately $2 million.
Alderman Sayad stated that some research needs to be done
on this matter.
Mrs.
Linda Laffey,
1888 Fargo Avenue, vice president of
the
Retired’
Employees
Association,
addressed
the
Committee
of
the
Whole
stating
that
they
have been
working on this for over one
(1)
year;
she thanked the
City for correcting the rate error,
but their
issue is
with the Medicare cost; they are asking for a fair rate.
~AGE
NIN~
HILLS AVE.
Mr.
D~n
Gaspar,
1619
Hills
Avenue,
addressed
the
(Cont’d.)
Committee of the Whole stating that he would be impacted
by
this project because his house is right next door,
the
lights would be shining on him; we need time to express
our
concerns;
something
has
to
‘be
done
with
this
property, but look at the corner first.
Alderman Beauvais stated that she would like to meet with
Alderman
Becker,
Acting
City
Manager—EDC
Director
Schneider,
the
owner’ of
the
corner
property
and
Mr.
Pontarelli to discuss this matter.
Moved by Brookman,
seconded
by
Beauvais,
to recommend
to
the City Council that
further discussion on
Zoning
Case 02—79—A regarding a Map Amendment to rezone property
located at 1601—03—09 Hills Avenue from R—l Single-Family
Residential District to C—3 General Commercial District
be
POSTPONED
until
April
21,
2003.
Motion
declared
carried.
MAYOR ARREDIA ASSUMED THE CHAIR AND DECLARED
THE CITY
COUNCIL BACK
IN
SESSION
ORDINANCE
Moved by Sayad, seconded
by
Smith, to adopt Ordinance M-
14-2-03
2-0 3,
AN
ORDINANCE
FOR
THE
VACATION
OF
THE
CHURCH
STREET
CHURCH
ST.
RIGHT-OF-WAY,
WEST
OF
BELLAIRE
AVENUE,
INCLUDING
THE
RIGHT-OF~WA~
VACATION
OF
THE
WATER
MAIN
EASEMENT
WITHIN
SAID
RIGHT-
VACATION:
OF-WAY.
Upon roll call, the vote was:
AYES:
8—Beauvais, Christiansen,
Murphy, Sayad,
Brookman,
Becker,
Smith, Argus
NAYS:
0-None
ABSENT:
0-None
Motion declared carried.
ORDINANCE
Moved by Sayad,
seconded
by
Murphy,
to place
on First
_______
Reading Ordinance M-ll-03,
AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE
REVISIONSI
I, “ADMINISTRATIVE” CHAPTER 6, “CITY
COUNCIL”
TO
ADDRESS
CITY
COUNCIL
CERTAIN
HOUSEKEEPING
MATTERS
(formerly 1-6-8 and
1-6-9).
RULES:
Motion declared carried.
Alderman Brookman requested that the record
show that
she is voting no on Rule VIII and Rule XXVIII.
ANNEXATION
Moved
by
Sayad,
seconded
by
Becker,
to
concur
with
AGREEMENTJ
recommendation of
Committee
of the Whole held February
9661 GOLF:
10,
2003,
to
approve
the
Water’s
Edge
Condominium
project and annexation agreement proposed
for property
Resolution
located at
9661 Golf Road
(formerly
Fisherman’s
Dude
R—26-03
Ranch), including the access roadway from Golf Road to
the Bay Colony parking lot, contingent upon results of
traffic studies to be completed within the next two
(2)
weeks;
and further recommend to adopt Resolution R-26-
03,
A
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING
THE
EXECUTION
OF
AN
“ANNEXATION
AGREEMENT”
FOR
THE
PROPERTY
COMMONLY
KNOWN
AS
9661
GOLF ROAD,
“WATER’S EDGE CONDOMINIUMS” BY THE
MAYOR
AND
ATTESTED
TO
BY
THE
CITY
CLERK
OF
THE
CITY
OF
DES
PLAINES.
Upon roll call,
the vote was:
AYES:
8—Beauvais,
Christiansen,
Murphy, Sayad,
Brookman, Becker,
Smith, Argus
NAYS:
.0-None
ABSENT:
0-None
Motion declared carried.
WARRANT
Moved by
Sayad,
seconded by Christiansen,
to concur with
REGISTEP.~
recommendation
of
Committee
of
the
Whole
to
adopt
Resolution R-25-03,
BE IT RESOLVED
BY THE CITY COUNCIL
Resolution
OF THE CITY OF DES PLAINES THAT THE FOLLOWING BILLS ARE
R-25-03
DUE AND PAYABLE AND THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AND
ARE
HEREBY
AUTHORIZED
TO
MAKE PAYMENT FOR SAME.
Total:
$2,710,822.28.
Upon roll call,
the vote was:
AYES:
8—Beauvais,
Christiansen,
Murphy,
Sayad,
Brookman, Becker,
Smith, Argus
NAYS:
0-None
ABSENT: 0-None
Motion declared carried.
AMENDMENTS!
Moved by
Beauvais,
seconded
by Sayad,
to concur
with
BOARD
OF FIRE
recommendation
of
Committee
‘of
the
Whole
to
approve
&
POLICE
Option B of the proposed changes to the Revised Rules
COMMISSIONERS
and
Regulations
of
the
Board
of
Fire
&
Police
RULES
& BEGS:
Commissioners,
and place on First Reading Ordinance M-
12—03.
Motion declared carried.
Ordinance
M-12-03
Moved
by
Beauvais,
seconded by Becker,
to advance to
Second Reading and adopt Ordinance M-l2-03, AN ORDINANCE
ADOPTING
THE
AMENDMENTS
TO
THE
REVISED
RULES
AND
REGULATIONS
OF
THE
BOARD
OF
FIRE
&
POLICE
COMMISSIONERS.
Upon roll
call,
the vote was:
AYES:
8-Beauvais,
Christiansen,
Murphy,
Sayad,
Brookman, Becker,
Smith, Argus
NAYS:
0-None,
ABSENT:
0-None,
Motion declared carried.
TRANSFER
Moved by Brookman,
seconded by Christiansen,
to concur
STATION
with recommendation of Committee of the Whole to approve
PERMIT!
the
construction
and
demolition
transfer
station
101-103 SELL:
application
to
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency
for Disposal
Management
Services,
101—103
Sell
Road.
Upon roll call,
the vote was:
AYES:
8—Beauvais,
Christiansen, Murphy, Sayad,
Brookman,
Becker,
Smith, Argus
NAYS:
0-None
ABSENT:
0-None
Motion declared carried.
ZONING CASE
Moved by Becker,
seconded by Brookman,
to concur with
02-79—A
recommendation of Committee of the
Whole
that further
MAP
AMEND.!
discussion
on
Zoning
Case
02—79—A
regarding
a
Map
1601-03—09
Amendment to rezone property located at 160l-03-O9 Hills
HILLS AVE.:
Avenue from R—1 Single—Family Residential District to C—
3 General Commercial District be POSTPONED until April
21,
2003.
Motion declared carried.
BID DATE!
.
City Clerk McAllister announced that the bid return date
EMERG. VEH.
for the 2003 Emergency Vehicle Priority Systems has been
PRIORITY
changed from February 20,
2003,
to 3:00 p.m.,
Thursday,
SYSTEMS:
February 27,
2003.
ORDINANCE
Moved by Smith,
seconded by Argus,
to advance to Second
14-11-03
Reading
and
adopt
Ordinance
M-11-03,
AN
ORDINANCE
REVISIONS!
AMENDING
TITLE
I,
“ADMINISTRATIVE”
CHAPTER
6,
“CITY
CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL”
TO
ADDRESS
CERTAIN,
HOUSEKEEPING
MATTERS
RULES:
(formerly 1—6—8
and 1—6—9).
Upon roll call,
the
vote
was:
‘AYES:
8—Beauvais,
Christiansen, ‘Murphy, Sayad,
Brookman, Becker, Smith, Argus
NAYS:
0-None
ABSENT: 0-None
Motion declared carried.
Alderman Brookman
requested that the record show that
she
is voting no on Rule VIII and Rule XXVIII.
AJOURNMENT:
Moved by Becker, seconded by Brookman,
that the regular
meeting of the City Council adjourn.
Motion declared
carried.
~
Donna’ McAllister,
NMC
-
CITY CLERK
APPROVED BY ME THIS
___________
DAY OF
___________________,
2003
Anthony
W.
Arredia,
MAYOR
Exhibit

Back to top

4
____________________
CITY
OF
DES PLAINES
1420
rvliner / Northwest
Highway
~
Des
Plaines,
Illinois 60016-4498
•
(847)
391-6300
March 21, 2003
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Nancy Peterson
FROM:
Ruth Broder
SUBJECT:
FOl #03-069
Attached
is the information requested in the above-referenced FOl:
1.
A copy ofthe final written decision of the City ofDes Plaines in the matter of
the Disposal Management Systems, Inc application for siting
a transfer
station at 101-103 Sell Road
in
Des Plaines, Illinois.
Attached is
a
certified
copy of the minutes ofthe
February
18, 2003 meeting of
the Des Plaines City Council at which the City Council voted to approve
the
transfer station application (page
7).
Also attached is
a copy ofthe Certification
ofSiting Approval (LPC-PA8), signed by
Mayor AnthonyW.
Arredia
and
attested by CityClerk Donna McAllister.
A letter will be sent to Disposal
Management Systems, Inc. the week ofMarch
24,
2003, along with the
Certification, describing the conditions ofapproval.
A copy will be sent to
SWANCC.
2.
A copy ofall written notices provided by the City of Des Plaines or by the
siting
applicant ofthe December 2, 2002 public hearing in the matter of
Disposal
Management Systems, Inc. application for siting of a transfer
station at 101-103 Sell Road in Des Plaines, Illinois.
A copy ofthe written notice is attached, along with a list ofthe persons
and
agencies to whom it was sent.
3.
A
copy ofall notifications published in
a newspaper of general circulation
providing
notice ofthe December 2, 2002 public hearing in the matter ofthe
Disposal Management Systems,
Inc. application for siting of a transfer
station at 101-103 Sell Road in Des Plaines, Illinois.
A copy of the
notice published in the Journal and Topics Newspaper on Friday,
November
15,
2002
is attached.
~
“4
~tI
~
LWJ
DES
ILLINOIS
Page 2 of 2
4.
A copy
ofall correspondence, documents, photographs, and any other data
or information provided to the City of Des Plaines or any ofits individual
employees or
officials by Disposal Management Systems, Inc. in connection
with its application for siting
a transfer station at 101-103 Sell Road,
Des
Plaines, Illinois, including,
but not limited to, any emergency response or fire,
hazardous substances or spill response plan.
The following correspondence is attached:
a.
A copy ofDisposal Management Systems, Inc. initial letter to the Cityof
Des Plaines, dated August
5,
2002, with attachments.
b.
A copy of a letter and attachments, dated January 22, 2003 fromJoe
Anderson, Disposal Management Systems, Inc. to Ruth Broder,
City ofDes
Plaines,responding to Ms. Broder’sJanuary 16, 2003 letter to Mr. Anderson.
5.
A copy ofany letter or other form of correspondence dated January 16, 2003
from Ruth Broder to Disposal Management
Systems, Inc. or pertaining to
Disposal Management Systems, Inc.
A copy of a letter
dated
January
16,
2003 from Ruth Broder, City ofDes Plaines,
to Joe
Anderson,
Disposal Management Systems, is
attached.
6.
A copy of any letter or other form of correspondence dated February 12,
2003 from Disposal Management Systems, Inc. to Ruth Broder or any other
employee or official ofthe City of Des Plaines pertaining to emergency
response or
fire, hazardous
substances or
spill prevention
and response at
the proposed transfer station.
A copy ofa letter dated
February 12,
2003
from Joe Anderson, Disposal
Management Systems,
Inc. to Ruth Broder, City ofDes Plaines, is attached.

Back to top

Exhibit
5
Name ofApplicant:
Address ofApplicant:
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
1021
NORTH
GRAND AVENUE
EAST,
P.O.
Box 19276,
SPRINGFIELD,
ILLINOIS
62794-9276
DIRECTOR
CERTIFICATION OF SITNG APPROVAL (LPC-PA8)
~j
j~
~_4#_,~_j
~,
‘—
/
V
~
.,rF
?~ir
--~
~‘
1’~
‘
Name of Site:
~i
?pC)..S&-~( P~’fl4y
~~~?‘v-4~S
z~
Site Infonnation:
Nearest City:
P~
P~
i~ç1~(
County:
~
L
1.
‘On
~-
1
,~W_,
the
~-
~
°~
~
(county or municipa ity)
(governing body of county or municipality)
—
approved the site location suitability of
site)
as a new pollution control facility
in accordance with Section 39.2 of the Illinois Environmental
Protection Act, Ill. Rev. Stat., ch.
111 ½
,
Section
1039.2.
of
2.
The facility was approved for the following activities:
waste storage
(_.._.),
landfill
(__.),
waste treatment
(_._)‘
waste disposal
(_____),
waste transfer station
~
3.
Attached to this certification is a true and correct statement of the legal description of the site as
it was
approved by the aforementioned local governing
body.
?~ee..
4.
Attached to this certification is
a true and accurate statement ofconditions,
if any, under which the
approval was provided. (Note: These conditions are provided for information only to the
IEPA.
The
JEPA is
not obligated to monitor or enforce local
conditions.)
5.
The
undersigned
has
been authorized
by
the
Ci
C-~_~-~e~1
of
(governing body of county or municipality)
to execute this certification
on behalf of
OeS
et
t~_~J2.-~
D~
~
(county or
municipality)
II. 512
LIE’
2UE
(Lv
AIr
.~)()
NAME:
(county or municipality)
MAYOR
TITLE:
_________________
CITY CLERK
NOtarITPLI
011~’OFP1CL(L
SEAL0
-
Nofaiy
Public
State
of~
-
Nancy
Peteraea
MyCommission EzpIrCS2.l3.O~
.
RYAN, GOVERNOR
ii~-
~‘~IIv’
•~
•.,~
~
...
~
Si~IW~’.
IQ’), (
‘I~qWt
ill
Vs.
S.’~I~’lI
IOYI
~
‘Ii
‘4
~
I
.IlItIIC I.’
ii.
u;uy
prt’vVIlI ilk
flints
lint
mulL!
r~”~’~”1
Ilk1
u,’isLI itoh
ii
y,,tir ;q.phk;rin.li It’nlg
•ktin’tl
~Iii,.
fl.iiii
Ihi~
Is’t’ii
.‘q9uI.s’nl
hi
I,,uiut’
h4l;uiti~!I’Ilk’IlI
C
toUr.
waste incinerator
(_).
TO BEFORE
ME
PRINTED
ON
RECYCLED
PAPER
PROOF OF SERVICE
Patricia F. Sharkey, an attorney, hereby certifies that she served acopy
of the foregoing
Notice of Filing
and Petition for Hearing to Contest Site Location Approval on the persons listed
belowby First Class U.S. Mail, proper postage prepaid, on March 24, 2003.
Mayor Anthony W. Arredia
City of Des Plaines
City Hall
1420 Miner Street
Des Plaines, IL
60016-4498
Donna McAllister
City Clerk
City of Des Plaines
City Hall
1420 Miner Street
Des Plaines, IL
600 16-4498
F. Sharkey

Back to top