• ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April
11$, 1971
E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO.
)
)
)
v.
)
#71—9
)
)
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
)
Opinion
of
the
Board
(by
Mr.
Currie):
DuPont manufactures explosives three miles from
Seneca,
Illinois (see EPA recommendation,
p. 1).
Explosive wastes
generated in its operations, including boxes in which explosives
have been stored and damaged primers
(R.
9),
have been disposed
of
by open
burning.
The
company asks extension of a variance
that
expired in December, 1970, to continue burning these wastes
until June 30, 1971, when it will have ceased the manufacture
of primers and therefore the need for further burning (R. 11—12).
We grant the extension.
Open burning is generally forbidden, but the statute reeognizes
that in some cases alternative methods of disposing of explosive
wastes would create a safety hazard sufficient to Justify open
burning (Environmental Protection Act, section 9(c)).
We have
granted similar applications in the past, conditioned on vigorous
efforts to discover alternative methods.
E.g., Olin Corp.
v.
EPA,
# 70—11
(Oct.
22, 1970).
In Olin’s case considerable pro-
gress has been made; in renewing that variance we were able to
require the reduction of open burning upon installation of newly
developed technology for abating emissions.
Olin Corp.
v. EPA,
# 71—7 (March
3,
1971).
Consequently in the present case the
hearing officer carefully explored the question whether this new
technology could be employed under the conditions of DuPont’s
operations.
The answer, concurred in by both the company’s ex-
pert
and
by the EPA’s, was that it could not be and
that
there
was no safe alternative to open burning in this case
(R.
l7’-l8).
To deny the variance thus would create a substantial risk of
explosion.
The proposed open burning will be relatively innoquous. The
EPA testified
that
burning
would take place in an isolated area
so
remote
that
no
one
would
know it
was
taking place
(R.
17).
The
nearest buildings other than DuPont’s
own
are 2000 feet away
(R.
6-7).
The
contaminants
produced
are
mostly carbon dioxide, nitrogen,
and water, with some light smoke, and perhaps small amounts of.
nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide
(R.
13_lIt, 20).
The EPA
1
—451
is convinced there will be
no nuisance
and no odors
(R.
21—22).
The burning
wIll
take place
for one hour each week
(R.
16) under
favorable wind conditions
(B.
23), 300 pounds
of materials per week
are exeected to
be
burned
(H.
16).
There have been no complaints
about
this burning in the past
(H.
7,
25).
DuPont has agreed
to stop
using
fuel
oil to ignite the wastes
(H.
13).
To
deny
the
variance
would
impose
an
arbitrary
or unreasonable
hardshir,
The
variance,
will
be granted upon conditions
stated
in the
order,
This ocinion constitutes
the Board’s findings of fact
and
conclusions
of
law.
ORDER
1.
ill.
DuPont Dekemours
&
Co.
is hereby granted
an
extension
of its variance to burn in the open not more than
300 pounds per
week of wastes
contaminated with explosives,
at the burning site
described
in the record, until June
30,
1971.
2.
No burning shall take place after June
30, 1971.
3.
No fuel
oil or other smoky material shall
be used in connection
with this burning,
I,
Regina
H, Ryan, certify that the Board adopted and approved
this opinion
by the Board this
~~ofA~rjI
I
—
452