1. NOTICE OFFILING~
      2. D. ‘Admission of Violations
      3. E. Compliance Activities to Date
      4. IV. APPLICABILITY
      5. V. COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER LAWS AND REGULATIONS
      6. VI. IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC RESULTING FROM ALLEGED NON-COMPLIANCE
      7. 3. Operation of the site was suitable for the area in
      8. VII. CONSIDERATION OF SECTION 42(h) FACTORS
      9. VIII. TERMS OF ‘SETTLEMENT
      10. A. Penalty Payment
      11. B. Future Use
      12. C. Cease and Desist
      13. D. Release from Liability
      14. E. Right of Entry
      15. G. Modification of Stipulation
      16. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION
CONTROL BOA~
c
E ~V E D
CLERK’S OFFICE
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
ILLINOIS
Complainant,
V.
YOUSSI REAL ESTATE A~D
DEVELOPMENT, ll’4C., an Illinois
Corporation,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
MAR
102005
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Pollution Control Board
NOTICE OFFILING~
To:
See attached Service List
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on the
10th day ofMarch,
2005,
the People ofthe State of
Illinois, filedwith the Illinois Pollution Control Board, a
Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement,
true and correct copies ofwhich are attached hereto and is hereby served upon you.
DATE:
March 10, 2005
By:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
ex
reL
LISA MADIGAN, Attorney General
Environmental Bureau
188 West Randolph Street,
20th
Fl.
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 814-6986
No. 05-60
(Enforcement
-
Water)
Assistant Attorney General
THIS FILING
IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED
PAPER

SERVICE LIST
Mr. Bradley P. Halloran, Esq.
Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R.
Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601
Mr. Charles
Gunnarson, Esq.
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, IL 62794-9276
Mr. Patrick Hayes, Esq.
Guyer
& Enichen
26OlReid Farm Road
Rockford, IL
61114

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARRECEIVED~
CLERK’SOFFICE
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
)
MAR
102005
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Complainant,
)
Pollution
Control Board
PCB 05-60
v.
(Enforcement
-
Water)
YOUSSI REAL ESTATE AND
DEVELOPMENT,
INC.,
an Illinois
)
Corporation,
~
Respondent.
STIPULATION
AI’~DPROPOSAL
FOR SETTLEMENT
Complainant, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, by LISA
MADIGAN, Attorney General of the State of Illinois,
the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agenc~T (“Illinois EPA”),
and YOUSSI REAL
ESTATE AND DEVELOPMENT,
INC.,
an Illinois Corporation
(“Respondent”),
have agreed to the making of this Stipulation and
Proposal for Settlement
(“Stipulation”)
and submit it to the
Illinois Pollution Control Board
(“Board”) for approval.
The
parties agree that the statement~bffácts~cbntainedherein
represents a fair summary of the evidence and testimony which
would be introduced by the parties if a~hearingwere held.
The
parties further stipulate that this statement of facts is made
and agreed upon for purposes of settlement only and that neither
1

the fact that a party has entered into this Stipulation,
nor any
of the facts stipulated herein,
shall be introduced into evidence
in any other proceeding regarding the claims asserted in the
Complaint except as otherwise provided herein.
If the Board
approves and enters this Stipulation,
Respondent agrees to be
bound by the Stipulation and Board Order and not to contest their
validity in any subsequent proceeding to implement
or enforce
their terms.
I.
JURISDICTION
The Board has jurisdiction of the subject matter herein and
of the parties consenting hereto pursuant to the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act
(“Act”),
415 ILCS 5/1 et
seq.
(2002)
II.
AUTHORIZATION
The undersigned representatives for each party certify that
they are fully authorized by the party whom they represent
to
enter into the terms and conditions of this Stipulation and to
legally bind them to
it.
2

III.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
A.
Parties
1.
On September 27,
2004,
a Complaint was filed on behalf
of thePeople
of the State of Illinois by Lisa Madigan, Attorney
General of the State of Illinois, on her own motion and upon the
request
of the Illinois EPA,
pursuant to Section 31 of the Act,.
415 ILCS 5/31(2002),
against the Respondent
2.
The Illinois EPA is an administrative agency of the
State of Illinois,
created pursuant to Section 4 of the Act,
415
ILCS 5/4
(2002)
.
3.
At all times relevant to the Complaint, Respondent was
and is an Illinois corporation that is authorized to transact
business in the State of Illinois.
B.
Site Description
1.
At all times relevant to the Complaint,
Respondent was
a developer of residential homes at the Prairie Meadow
subdivision,
a 72.2 acre parcel of land located at the corner of
Dawson Lake Road and Caledonia Road in the Village of Tirnberlane,
Boone County,
Illinois
(“site”).
2.
Respondent built Phase
II of the site
(“Phase
II”),
a
28 acre parcel where lot sizes average
1.3 acres each,
beginning
sometime in 2003 until mid-2004,
on dates better known to
3

Respondent.
3.
Since 2003,
at least one stormwater retention pond was
located
at. the Site to allow stormwater settling prior to
discharge from Phase II.
Any overflow from the retention pond
would
flow south approximately one mile to the headwaters of
Beaver Creek which is a tributary to the Kishwaukee River.
4.
During development and construction activities
at Phase
II from 2003 until mid-2004,
Respondent performed or directed
affairs which disturbed and moved topsoil.
5.
During development and construction activities
at Phase
II from 2003 until mid-2004,
the site was not covered by a
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(“NPDES”)
stormwater discharge permit.
.
C.
Allegations of
Non-Compliance
Complainant contends that the Respondent has violated the
following provisions
of the Act and Board regulations:
Count
I:
Failure to secure a NPDES stormwater discharge
permit for Phase II construction activities,
in
violation of Section 12(f)
of the Act,
415 ILCS
5/12(f)
(2002)
and Section 309.103 of the
Pollution Control Board’s regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm. Code 309.103.
4

D.
‘Admission of Violations
The Respondent admits.to the violation alleged in the
Complaint filed in this matter and referenced within Section
III.C herein.
E.
Compliance Activities to Date
Respondent subsequently submitted a Notice of Intent
(“NOI”)
for coverage under the general NPDES stormwater discharge permit
for
construction
and,
development
activities
at
the
Site.
IV.
APPLICABILITY
This
Stipulation
shall
apply
to
and
be
binding
upon
the
Complainant and the Respondent,
and any officer,
director,
agent,
or
employee
of
the
Respondent,
as
well
as
any
successors
or
assigns of the Respondent.
The Respondent shall not raise as a
defense
to
any
enforcement
action
taken
pursuant
to
this
Stipulation
the
failure
of
any
of
its
officers,’
directors,
agents,
employees or successors or assigns
to take such action as
shall be required to comply with the provisions of this
Stipulation.
V.
COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER LAWS AND REGULATIONS
This Stipulation in no way affects the responsibilities of
the Respondent to comply with any other federal,
state or local
S

laws or regulations including,
but not limited to, the Act and
the Board regulations,
35
Ill. Adm.
Code,
Subtitles A through H.
VI.
IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC RESULTING FROM ALLEGED NON-COMPLIANCE
Section 33(c)
of the Act,
415 ILCS 5/33 (c) (2002)
,
provides
as follows:
In making its orders and determinations,
the Board
shall take into consideration all the facts and
circumstances bearing upon the reasonableness of the
emissions,
discharges,
or deposits involved including,
but not limited to:
1.
the character and degree of injury to,
or
interference with the protection of the health,
general welfare and physical property of the
people;
2.
the
social
and
economic
value
of
the
pollution
source;
3.
the suitability or unsuitability of the pollution
source to the area in which it
is located,
including the question of priority of location in
the area involved;
4.
the technical practicability and economic
reasonableness’of
reducing or eliminating the
emissions,
discharges or deposits resulting from
such pollution source; and
5.
any subsequent compliance.
In response to these factors,
the parties state the
following:
1.
The
environment
was
threatened
and
the
Illinois
EPA’s
information gathering responsibilities were hindered by the
Respondent’ s violations.
6

2.
There
is social and economic benefit to the site.
3.
Operation of the site was suitable for the area in
which it ‘occurred.
4.
Obtaining a permit prior to construction at the site
and compliance with its terms was both technically practicable
and economically reasonable.
5.
Respondent has subsequently complied with the Act and
the Board Regulations
-
,.
VII. CONSIDERATION OF SECTION 42(h)
FACTORS
Section 42 (h)
of the Act,
415 ILCS 5/42 (h) (2002)
,
provides
as follows:
In
determining
the
appropriate
civil
penalty
to
be
imposed under
.
.
.
thisSection,
the Board
is
authorized to consider any matters of record in
mitigation
or
aggravation
of
penalty,
including
but
not
limited
to
the
following
factors:
1.
the duration and gravity of the violation;
2.
the presence or absence of due diligence on the
part of the respondent
in attempting to comply
with requirements of this Act and regulations
thereunder or to secure relief therefrom as
provided by this Act;
3.
any economic benefits accrued by the respondent
because of delay in compliance with requirements,’
in which case the economic benefits shall be
determined
by
the
lowest
cost
alternative
for
achieving compliance;
~:,
,
,,,,,,‘~.•
4.
the
amount
of
monetary
penalty
which
will
serve
to
‘deter further violations by the respondent and to
otherwise aid in enhancing voluntary compliance
7

with this Act by the respondent and other persons
similarly subject to the Act;
5.
the number, proximity in time,
and gravity of
previously adjudicated violations of this Act by
the
respondent;
6.
whether the respondent voluntarily self-disclosed,
in accordance with subsection
i of this Section,
the non-compliance to the Agency;
and
7.
whether the respondent has agreed to undertake
a
“supplemental environmental project,” which means
an environmentally beneficial project that
a
respondent agrees to undertake in settlement of an
enforcement action brought under this Act, but
which the respondent is not otherwise legally
required to perform.
In response to these
factors,
the parties state as follows:
1.
The Respondent failed to obtain coverage under the
general NPDES stormwater permit for construction site activities
prior to beginning construction activities at the site.
The
violations began sometime in 2003,
and were resolved in mid-2004.
2.
Respondent was diligent in attempting to come back into
compliance with the Act, and Board regulations, once the Illinois
EPA notified it of its noncompliance.
3.
Respondent failed to secure the necessary NPDES permit
to conduct construction activities at Phase II.
Respondent
obtained a minimal economic benefit as a result of the delay in
obtaining this NPDES
Permit.
The $5,000.00 penalty herein
recovers that economic benefit.
8

4.
Complainant
has
determined,’based
upon
the
specific
facts of this matter,
that
a penalty of five thousand dollars
($5,000.00) will
serve to deter further violations and aid in
‘future
voluntary
compliance
with
the
Act
and
Board
regulations.
5.
To Complainant!s knowledge,
Respondent has no
previously adjudicated violations of the Act.
6.
Self-disclosure
is
not
at
issue
in
this
matter.
7.
The settlement of this matter does not ‘include a
supplemental
environmental
project.
VIII.
TERMS OF ‘SETTLEMENT
A.
Penalty Payment
1.
The
Respondent
shall
pay
a
civil
penalty
in
the
sum
five
thousand
dollars
($5,000.00)
within
thirty
(30)
days
from
the date the Board adopts and accepts this Stipulation.
The
Respondent stipulates that payment has been’ tendered to
Respondent’s attorney of record in this matter in a form
acceptable
to
that
attorney.
Further,
Respondent
stipulates
that
said attorney has been directed to make the penalty payment on
behalf
of
Respondent,
within
thirty
(.30)
days
from
the
date
the
Board
adopts
and
accepts
this
Stipulation,
in
a
manner
prescribed
below.
The
penalty
described
in
this
Stipulation
shall
be
paid
by certified check, money order or electronic
funds transfer
payable
to
the
Illinois
EPA
designated
to
the
Illinois
9

Environmental
Protection
Trust
Fund.
A
certified
check
or
money
order shall be submitted to:
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency
Fiscal
Services
Section
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield,
IL 62794-9276
The name and number of the case and Respondent’s Federal Employer
Identification
Number
(FEIN),
36-3673070,
shall
appear
on
the
check.
If
submitting
an
electronic
funds
transfer
to
the
Illinois
EPA,
the
electronic
funds
transfer
shall
be
made
in
accordance
with
specific
instructions
to
be
timely
provided
to
Defendant
prior
to
the
date
of
the
entry
of
the
Consent
Order.
A
copy
of
the
certified
check,
money
order
or
record
of
electronic
funds
transfer
and
any
transmittal
letter
shall
be
sent to:
Joel
J. Sternstein
Assistant
Attorney....~~~nera1
“r
Environmental Bureau
188
W.
Randolph
St.,
20th
Floor
Chicago,
Illinois .60601
Charles
Gunnarson
Assistant Counsel
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency
1021 Ndrth Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
,
Springfield,
Illinois 62794-9276
2.
Pursuant
to
Section
42(g)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/42(g)
(2002)’,
interest
shall
accrue
on
any
payment
not
paid
within
the
time
period
prescribed
above
at
the
maximum
rate
allowable
under
10

Section
1003(a)
of
the
Illinois
Income
Tax
Act,
35
ILCS
5/1003
(2002)
.
Interest
on
any
unpaid
payment
shall
begin
to
accrue
from
the
date
the
payment
is
due
and
continue
to
accrue
until
the
date
payment
is
received.
When
partial
payment(s)
are
made,
such
partial
payment
shall
be
first
applied
to
any
interest
on
unpaid
payment
then
due
and
owing.
All
interest
on
payment
owed
shall
be paid by certified check, money order or electronic funds
transfer,
payable
to
the
Illinois
EPA,
designated
to
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Trust
Fund
and
delivered
to
the
address
and in the manner described above.
3.
For purposes of payment and collection,
Respondent’s
attorney
may
be
reached
at
the
following
address:
Patrick
W.
Hayes
Guyer & Enichen
2601 Reid Farm Road
Rockford,
IL
61114
4.
In the event of default of this Section VIII.A, the
Complainant
shall
be
entitled
to
all
available
relief
including,
but
not
limited
to,
reasonable
costs
of
collection
and
reasonable
attorney’s fees.
B.
Future Use
Notwithstanding
any
other
language
in
this
Stipulation
to
the
contrary,
and
in
consideration
‘of’~the mutual
promisesand
conditions
contained
in
this
Stipulation,
including
the
Release
11

from
Liability
contained
in
Section
VIII.F,
below,
the
Respondent
hereby
agrees
that
this
Stipulation
may
be
used
against
the
Respondent
in any subsequent enforcement action or permit
proceeding
as
proof
of
a
past
adjudication
of
violation
of
the
Act and the Board RegulatiOns promulgated thereunder for all
violations
alleged
in
the
Complaint
in
this
matter,
for
purposes
of
Section
39(a)
and
(i)
and/or
42(h)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
‘5/39 (à)”~and(i)“añdfO~”5’/42(h) (2002)
.
‘~.
Further,
Respondent
agrees
to waive any rights to contest,
in any subsequent enforcement
‘action
or
permit
proceeding,
any
allegations
that
these
alleged
violations
were “àidjtidi6à’?ed.
C.
Cease and Desist
The
Respondent
shall
cease
and
desist
from
future
violations
of the Act and Board Regulations that were the subject matter of
the
Complaint
as
outlined
in
Section
III.C
(“Allegations
of
Non-
Compliance”)
of
this
Stipulation.
D.
Release from Liability
In
consideration
of
the
Respondent’s
payment
of
the
$5,000.00
penalty
and
any
specified
costs
and
accrued
interest,
to Cease”and”Desist~”asconta±nedin~SectionVIII.E and upon the
Pollution
Control
Board’s
acceptance
and
approval
of
the
terms
of
this
Stipulation
and.
Proposal
for
Settlement,
the
Complainant
12

releases,
waives
and
discharges
the
Respondent
from
any
further
liability
or
penalties
for
violations
of
the
Act
and
Board
Regulations that were
the’ subject matter of the Complaint herein.
‘.~..~The~release
set forth above does not extend to any matters other
than those expressly specified in Complainant’s Complaint
filed
on September 27,
2004.
The Complainant reserves,
and this
Stipulation
is
without
prejudice
to,
all
rights
of
the
State
of
~‘
Illinois
against, the Respondent with respect. to.. all.,.other
matters,
including
but
not
limited
to,
the
follow’ing:~-’
a.
criminal liability;
b.
liability
for
future
violation
of
state,
federal,
local,
and common laws and/or regulations;
c.
liability,f
or
natural
resources
damage
arising
out
of
the alleged violations;
and
d.
liability
or
claims
based
on
the
Respondent’s
failure
to satisfy the requirements of this Stipulation.
Nothing in this Stipulation is intended as a waiver,
discharge,
release,
or
covenant
not
to
sue
for
any
claim
or
cause
of
action,
administrative
or
judicial,
civil
or
criminal,
past
or
future,
in law or in equity, which the ,State of Illinois or the
Illinois
EPA
may
have
against
any
person,
as
defined
by
Section
3.315 of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/3.315,
or entity other than the
Respondent.
13

E.
Right of Entry
In addition to any other authority,
the Illinois EPA,
its
employees
and
representatives,
and
the
Attorney
General,
her
agents and representatives,
shall have the right of entry into
and upon the site which is the subject of this Stipulation,
at
all
reasonable
times
for
the
purposes
of
carrying
out
inspections.
In
conducting
such
inspections,
the
Illinois
EPA,
its employees and representatives,
and the Attorney General,’’her~’:~
employees and representatives may take photographs,
samples, and
collect information,
as they deem necessary.
F.
Correspondence,
Reports and Other Documents
Any and all correspondence,
reports and any other documents
required under this Stipulation,
except for payments pursuant to
Sections VIII.A
(“Penalty Payment”)
an’d C
(“Stipulated
Penalties”)
of this Stipulation shall be submitted as follows::
As to the Complainant
Joel Sternstein
Assistant Attorney General
(or other designee)
Environmental Bureau
188 W. Randolph St.,
20th
Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Charles Gunnarson
Assistant Counsel
Illinois EPA
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield,
Illinois 62794-9276
14

As
to
the
Respondent
Patrick W. Hayes
Guyer
& Enichen
2601 Reid Farm Road
Rockford,
IL 61114
G.
Modification of Stipulation
The parties may, by mutual written consent, agree to extend
any compliance dates or modify the terms of this Stipulation.
A
request ‘for’any~.rnodificationshall be made in writing and
submitted
to’
the.. contact
persons
identified”~.”i~~~’Section
VIII.H.
Any such request shall be made by separate document, and shall
not be submitted within any other report
Or’ submittal required by
this
Stipulation.
Any
such
agreed
modification
shall
be
in
writing,
signed
by
authorized
representatives’of
each
party,
and
then
accompany
a
joint
motion
to
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
seeking
a
modification
of
the
prior
order
approving
and
accepting the Stipulation to approve and accept the Stipulation
as amended.
.
H.
Enforcement of Board Order
1.
Upon the entry of the Board’s Order approving and
accepting
this
Stipulation
and
Proposal
for
Settlement,
that
Order
is
a
binding
and
enforceable
order
of
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
and
may
be
enforced
as
such
through
any
and
all
available
means.
15

2.
Respondent agrees that notice of any subsequent
proceeding
to
enforce
the
Board
Order
approving
and
accepting
this
Stipulation
and
Proposal
for
Settlement
may
be
made
by
mail
arid
waives
any
requirement
of
service
of
process.
3.
The parties agree that,
if the Board does not approve
and
accept
this
Stipulation
and
Proposal
for
Settlement,
then
neither
party
is
bound
by
the
terms
herein.
4.
It is the intent of the Complainant and Respondent that
the
provisions
of
this
Stipulation
and
Proposal
for
Settlement
and any Board Order accepting and approving such shall be
severable,
and should any provision be declared by
a court of
competent
jurisdiction
to
be
inconsistent
with
state
or
federal
law,
and
therefore
unenforceable,
the
remaining
clauses
shall
remain in full force and effect.
16

‘WHEREFORE,
Complainant
and
Respondent
request
that
the
Board
adopt
and
accept
the
foregoing
Stipulation
and
Proposal
for
Settlement
as
written.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
LISA
MADIGAN
Attorney General
State of Illinois
MATTHEW
J.
DUNN,
Chief
Environmental
Enforcement/,~,,
,,
Asbestos Litigation Division
‘2
BY:
11
~
(N~u”~t~
TE:
RO~MARI
~ZEAU,
Chi~
Environmental Bureau
Assistant Attorney General
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
l-(
DATE:
~g
BY:
______
_____
‘WILLIAM
D.
ING
SOLL
Acting
Chief
Legal
Counsel
YOUSSI
REAL
ESTATE
AND
DEVELOPMENT,
INC.
BY
__________________
,
DATE:
~
/1
q/o~
CHRISTOPHEF/’YOUSSi
President
G:\Environmental Enforcement\JOEL\Case Documents\Yous~i\Stipuiationfinal .doc
17

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I,George
D.
Theophilos, anAssistant
AttorneyGeneral,
do
certify
that
I
causedto bemailed,
this
10th
day of March,
2005,
the
foregoing
STIPULATION
AND
PROPOSAL
FOR
SETTLEMENT to thepersons listed on said Service Listby first class mail in apostage pre-paid
envelope
and
depositingsamewith theUnited States Postal Service located at
100 West
Randolph
Street, Chicago, Illinois
60601.
-
-
‘GeorgeD~‘heophilos
1/

Back to top