ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
October
28, 1971
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
v.
)
#
71—101
BELOIT FOUNDRY CO.
Alvin Liedling, Assistant Attorney General,
for the Environmental
Protection Agency
Stanley Guyer for Beloit Foundry Co.
Opiniol) of the Board
(by Mr. Currie):
The parties have stipulated to the facts relative to this
Agency complaint.
Beloit Foundry operates
a grey
iron cupola in
South Beloit, presently equipped with a Schneibel Wet Collector.
Relying on the manufacturer~s guarantee, Beloit estimated particulate
emissions
at
24.8 pounds per hour, which,
as it read the regulations,
was
in compliance with
the limit of 25,10.
These figures were
reported to the Agency
in
a letter of intent filed as required,
but no program for achieving compliance
(Acerp)
was filed because
the company believed it was already complying.
In 1970 the company nevertheless employed
a commercial test-
ing company to perform a stack test, which revealed that the collector
was only 50
efficient and that therefore emissions
(180 lb/hr in
the absence of any controls) were substantially
in excess of those
permitted.
Moreover, the company
in fact misread the regulations,
so that even the emissions
as calculated on the basis
of the
guarantee were slightly in excess of the 20.7 lb/hr actually permitted.
Upon learning of the adverse stack test the company contracted
for the installation of
a baghouse and other equipment that ~hould
reduce emissions to the
low level of
3.35
lb/hr.
Completion
is
promised by March
20,
1972.
We note with pleasure that among the
equipment
is an afterburner that should reduce carbon monoxide
emissions even before
the adoption of our proposed regulation on
that subject.
That there has been
a violation of the regulations with respect
to
the filing of
a program and
to the emission of particulates
is
clear.
The question
is one of remedy.
A shutdown of the plant
is out of the question.
The pollution
is not that severe;
the plant
is relatively remotely situated
and
the neighbors do not object to allowing continued operation during
2
—
719
the installation.
A shutdown would
put 190 people out of work
and cripple the company.
The parties have agreed that we should
allow operation while
the company pursues its program,
and we
shall
so order.
The remaining issue
is money penalties.
In light of
the
company’s good faith reliance on the manufacturer’s guarantee and
of its commendable action in proceeding with
a stack test and
with plans
to correct the deficiency,
we think
no such penalty
is necessary.
This opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions
of law.
ORDER
1.
Beloit Foundry Co.
shall cease and desist from particulate
emissions
in excess of those permitted by the Rules
and Regulations
Governing the Control
of Air Pollution by no later than March
20,
1972.
2.
Beloit Foundry Co.
shall pursue with diligence the control program
described
in the record.
3.
Within
35 days after receipt of
this order, Beloit Foundry
Co.
shall post with the Agency
a bond or other security in the
amount of $150,000
to assure compliance with the terms of this
order.
I.
Regina E.
Ryan, Clerk of the Pollution Control Board, certify
that the Board adopted the above Opinion this
28
day of
October
1971.
2
—
720