ILLINOIS
PD ~~T~UTI0NCONTROL
BOARD
Daccibai:
9,
1971
NV
aON~’LhTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
v.
)
#
71—320
C1fl Ci\C0
HOUSING
AUTHORITY
~‘~c
i-ninary
Order
(by
Mr.
Currie)
We
have
received
the
transcripts
in
this
case,
and
a
~q
sohedule
has
been
set.
We
note
that the record appears
are:
enough
to
permit
us,
upon
receipt
of
the
briefs,
to
~
:be
ic~ueof whether
or
not
violations
have
taken
place,
to
enable
us
to frame
an
intelligent order with respect
ci
remedial
steos
that
may
be
cal led for.
Were
we
to
wait
Liea
decide
Lhe
e~~ebefo~a
a~L~ia~
a
ear
hearing
on
the
question
of
remedy,
a
considerable
time
AOUL~
elapse
before
meaningful
~progress
could
begin
on
any
necas’~e~y control
program.
We
point
out
for
future
reference
that
it
is
highly
desirable
that
evidence
as
to
remedy
he
placed
in
the
original
record
szo
that
such
a
delay
will
not
occur.
In the present case we
deem
it
edvisahic
to minimize the resultant delay by immediately
~tnceizinq
a second
hearing
on
the
issue of remedy.
That
near:Laq
shall
be
held
as soon
as
practicable and
shall be
j:dre~ercd
to
such matters
as
what alternatives for refuse disposal
in
conformance
with
the
law
an~d
regulations, including scavenger
removal
to an aperoved landfill or incinerator,
exist; what
are
the
costs
er
other
adverse consequences
of such alternatives;
what
periods
of
time
would
he required to institute them;
and
what
interim
meaeures
could
be taken,
at what price, to reduce
the
problem
before
a
nermonent
solution could be achieved.
laforin.~tion
as
to
the
resolution
of
a pending proceeding on the
same
nublect
before
the
City
of
Chicago authorities would also
be
relevant.
A
hearing
is
hereby
authorized.
I,
Christen
MeEfett,
Actrn~
Clerk
of
the
Pollution
Control
Board,
certify
that
the
hce~rd adopted
the
above
Preliminary
Order
this______
day
of
Feaember,
1971.