ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION
    CONTROL
    BOARD
    June
    6, 1972
    ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION
    AGENCY
    v.
    )
    PCB
    71-367
    CONSOLIDATED FOODS
    CORPORATION,
    a corporation,
    and HOLLYWOOD
    BRANDS,
    DIVISION OF
    CONSOLIDATED FOODS
    CORPORATION
    William
    J.
    Scott,
    Illinois
    Attorney
    General,
    by
    Wayne
    Golomb,
    Assistant
    Attorney
    General,
    for the
    Environmental
    Protection
    Agency
    Russel
    E.
    Larson,
    Executive
    Vice
    President,
    for Consolidated
    Foods
    Corporation
    etal
    OPINION
    AND ORDER
    OF
    THE
    BOARD
    (by
    Mr.
    Dumelle):
    This
    complaint,
    filed
    November
    23,
    1971,
    charges
    that
    the respondents
    have:
    a)
    failed
    to implement
    an approved
    Air
    Contaminant
    Emission
    Reduction
    Program
    and failed
    to make
    required
    periodic
    progress
    reports,
    in violation
    of Rule
    2-2.41
    of the
    Rules
    and Regulations
    Governing
    the
    Control
    of Air Pollution;
    and
    b)
    since
    July 1,
    1970,
    caused,
    allowed
    and permitted
    the
    discharge
    and
    emission
    of one or
    more
    contaminants
    into the
    environment
    so as
    to
    cause
    or
    tend to cause
    air
    pollution
    in Illinois,
    either
    alone or
    in
    combination
    with contaminants
    from
    other
    sources,
    in violation
    of
    Section
    9(a) of the
    Environmental
    Protection
    Act;
    and
    c)
    installed
    and operated
    said facilities
    and
    equipment since
    approximately
    September
    15,
    1970,
    the
    same being
    capable
    of,
    and
    in fact,
    causing
    air
    pollution,
    the
    same
    having been
    installed
    without
    a permit
    granted
    by the
    Agency,
    in violation
    of
    Section
    9(b)
    of the
    Act.
    On
    May
    23,
    1972,
    the parties
    entered
    into
    and
    filed
    a written
    stipulation
    wherein the
    respondents
    admitted
    to
    all
    the
    alleged
    violations.
    The
    stipulation
    indicates
    that
    the respondents~ original
    intent
    was
    to
    convert
    their
    boilers from
    coal
    to
    gas
    by
    September,
    1970.
    However,
    gas became
    unavailable
    and the plans
    were modified.
    The
    stipulation further
    indicates
    4
    651

    that
    the
    respondents
    did convert
    their
    boilers
    from
    coal
    to oil
    as
    of
    July
    26,
    1971,
    and
    that
    their
    failure
    to
    file
    for
    a permit
    therefor
    was
    throug~iinadvertence.
    The
    stipulation
    also
    indicates
    that
    the
    respondents
    have
    now
    made
    application
    for
    the
    permit
    to operate
    the
    oil-fired
    boilers
    and that
    the
    respondents
    agree
    to
    take
    all
    measures
    necessary
    to
    insure
    the
    proper
    issuance
    of
    a
    valid
    operating
    permit
    in the
    shortest
    possible
    time.
    Inasmuch
    as
    the
    respondents
    have
    admitted
    to all
    the
    alleged
    violations,
    we
    find
    that
    those
    violations
    did
    in fact occur
    as
    alleged.
    We further
    find that
    a penalty
    of
    $500
    (Five
    Hundred
    Dollars)
    would
    be
    appropriate
    under
    these
    circumstances.
    The
    penalty
    for
    these
    violations
    would
    normally
    be greater
    except
    for
    the
    fact
    that
    the
    respondents
    have
    already
    dealt
    with
    the
    emission
    problem
    by
    making
    the
    conversion
    and
    have
    already
    made
    application
    for
    their
    permit.
    Furthermore,
    the
    change
    in plans
    due to
    the
    unavailability
    of gas
    is
    a mitigating
    factor
    to
    be
    considered.
    This
    opinion
    constitutes
    the
    Boardts
    findings
    of fact
    and
    conclusions
    of law.
    WHEREFORE
    it
    is hereby
    ordered:
    A.
    The
    respondents
    shall
    take
    all
    measures
    necessary
    to
    insure
    the
    proper
    issuance
    of
    valid
    operating
    permit
    for
    their
    boilers
    in
    the
    shortest
    possible
    time;
    and,
    B.
    The
    respondents
    shall
    heretofore
    make
    all
    periodic
    progress
    reports
    as
    required
    by
    Rule
    107
    of
    the
    Rules
    and
    Regulations
    Governing
    the
    Control
    of
    Air
    Pollution;
    and,
    C.
    The
    respondents
    are
    jointly
    and
    severally
    liable
    and
    shall
    pay
    to the
    State
    of
    Illinois,
    on
    or
    before
    July
    1,
    1972,
    the
    total
    sum
    of
    Five
    Hundred
    Dollars
    ($500. 00)
    as
    a penalty
    for
    the
    violations
    found
    in this
    opinion.
    A
    certified
    check
    or
    money
    order
    should
    be
    made
    payable
    to
    the
    State
    of
    Illinois
    and
    shall
    be
    sent
    to
    the
    Environmental
    Protection
    Agency,
    Fiscal
    Services
    Division,
    2200
    Churchill
    Road,
    Springfield,
    Illinois
    62706.
    I,
    Christan
    L.
    Moffett,
    Clerk
    of the
    Illinois
    Pollution
    Control
    Board,
    hereby
    certify
    that
    the
    above
    Opinion
    and Order
    was
    adopted
    by the
    Board
    on
    the
    ~~‘kday
    of
    ~
    1972,
    by
    a vote
    of
    q’...
    6
    Christan
    L.
    Moffett,
    Clerk
    Illinois
    Pollution
    Control
    Board
    4
    652

    Back to top