ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
June
7,
1973
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB 72—269
CHICAGO & EASTERN ILLINOIS RAIL-
ROAD COMPANY,
a corporation,
Respondent.
Douglas T. Moring, Assistant Attorney General,
on behalf of
Complainant;
Patrick C. Mullen on behalf of Respondent.
OPINION
AND
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr.
Seaman):
This is a complaint brought by the Environmental Protection
Agency
(hereinafter referred to as Agency)
against the Chicago
& Eastern Illinois Railroad Company,
a corporation,
(hereinafter
referred to as Respondent).
The complaint charges the Respondent with numerous viola-
tions of Sections 12(a)
and
(d) of the Environmental Protection
Act (hereinafter referred to as Act)
and of Rule 403 and 601 (b)
Chapter
3 of the Illinois Pollution Control Board
(hereinafter
referred to as Rules).
Other violations ch~rgedwere of Rule
10(c) and of Rule 1.03 of SWB-15 and continued in effect by
Section 49(c)
of the Act.
Respondent operates a railroad yard and diesel servicing
facility in Dolton, County of Cook,
Illinois.
Specifically,
it
is charged that Respondent discharged diesel oil into a storm
sewer which in turn discharged the oil into the Little Calumet
River; deposited diesel oil upon its land in such
a manner as to
create
a water pollution hazard; discharged diesel oil as an
effluent into the Little Calumet River;
failed to take reason-
able measures to prevent the spillage of diesel oil from causing
water pollution;
failed to provide facilities
for the treatment
of industrial wastes; and allowed the soil and surface at its
facility to become so saturated with diesel oil as to cause a
continuing water pollution hazard from rain water runoff.
8
—
201
—2—
The violations
of both the Act and Rules and Regulations
controlling the discharge of debris,
oil, grease,
scum or
sludge solids spans a period of time between July,
1970 and
June,
1972
(See Exhibit A).
A Stipulation was filed between the Respondent and the
Complainant which stipulates to the facts of the complaint,
Exhibit A and to the pictures and evidence contained in Exhibit
B.
Let the Board now indicate that the chronicle of evidence
presented by Agency Engineer Lawrence E.
Ziemba in Exhibit B
represents one of the Agency’s best efforts.
The Stipulation attempts
to mitigate Respondent~sviola-
tions by showing prosecutions and convictions by other govern-
mental agencies and by a showing of the expenditure of
approximately Two Hundred Thousand Dollars
($200,000)
for the
installation of control devices.
We are always impressed with
a program of compliance and
indeed the expenditure of the monies aforementioned to suggest
that the Respondent is making
a good effort toward averting
further violations and this persuades us to impose a lesser
penalty than would otherwise prevail.
We
are not impressed as mitigation that both the United
States Government and the Metropolitan Sanitary District of
Greater Chicago have either assessed fines, injunctions, or water
pollution abatement programs against the Respondent prior to our
decision.
This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclu-
sions of law of the Board.
IT
IS THE ORDER of the Pollution Control Board that the
Respondent, Chicago
& Eastern Illinois Railroad Company,
a
corporation:
1.
Cease and desist from the continuation of the afore-
said violations;
2.
Excavate its facility, provide dikes, clean exist-
ing storm sewers,
and submit its water pollution abatement
program to the Agency for its approval within
35 days from the
date of the entry of this Order.
8
—
202
—3—
3.
Chicago and Eastern Illinois Railroad Company
shall pay to the State of Illinois the
sum
of $5,000 within
35 days of the date of this Order.
Penalty payment by certified
check or money order payable to the State of Illinois shall be
made to:
Fiscal Services Division, Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency,
2200 Churchill Road,
Springfield, Illinois
62706.
I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
certify that the above Opinion and Order was adopted by
the Board on the
7’~
day of
—.
,
1973,
by a
voteof
4
to
~
8— 203