ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August
22,
1972
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
V.
#72—216
IOWA-ILLINOIS GAS
& ELECTRIC CO.
Supplemental Order & Opinion of the Board
(by Mr. Currie):
Having received a stipulation and arguments in this case,
we concluded that the case was ready for decision and entered a
final order July 25,
1972,
rejecting certain legal defenses
and imposing a $1000 penalty for the admitted installation
of equipment without
a permit.
Now the Agency informs us that a public hearing scheduled
for August
24 had been expected by the parties nevertheless
to be held and asks us to set aside the order in order to
permit additional public participation as contemplated when
the hearing was scheduled.
It has been our preferred procedure,
even where a stipulation
is reached on all factual
issues, and indeed even when the
parties agree on a proposed disposition,
to require that
the stipulation and proposal be presented publicly so that
affected citizens have
a meaningful opportunity to know the
terms and to express their views.
See,
e.g., EPA v. Granite
City Steel Co.,
#70—34
(May
3,
1972).
In the present case
the
parties,
it now appears, had expected to be able to
make presentations at such a hearinq on the stipulation, and
our order inadvertently deprived them of that opportunity.
Fairness to the parties,
as well as regard for our policy of
public participation,requires us
to vacate the order and to
permit the hearing to be held,
following which we shall
consider all materials before us and decide the case accordingly.
It is
so ordered.
In order that in our crowded schedule the risk of this
kind of misunderstanding may be minimized in the future, we re-
quest all hearing officers formally to certify to the Board when
all materials relevant to Board consideration have been
received.
We have not asked for such certification in the past,
but increasing docket pressures make greater formality an unfor-
tunate necessity,
as the present case shows.
I, Christan Moffett, Clerk of the Pollution Control Board, certify
that the Board adopted the above Supp1ement~lOrder
& Opinion this
.~~“~day
of August,
1972, by
a vote of ?~—cD
.
(~L~&
~
1
J~
5
—
231