ILLINOIS
POLLUTIoN
CONTROL
13)ARI)
October
31,
1972
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
v.
)
PCB
72-265
J.
C.
DILL
SUPPLEMENTAL
STATEMENT
(by
Mr.
Dumeile)
While
I
concur
in
the
opinion
and decision
I think
it
important
to
elaborate
UPOfl
thE~deciding
factor
for
me
in
not
requiring
a
heavy
penalty
in this
case.
in normal
circumstances,
a
flagrant
disregard
as
in
this
case,
of
this
Boards
earlier
order
of
August
13,
1971
should
bring
with
it
severe
penalties,
perhaps
10
times
the
initial
penalty
of
$200;
namely
$2000.
The
Assistant
Attorney
General
present
at
the
Board
meeting
of
October
31,
1972 volunteered
the
information
that
the
earlier
penalty
of
$200
was
currently
being
collected
under
a
court
order
at the
rate
of
$10 per
month.
Given that
court
determination
of poverty,
it
would
be almost
futile
to
add
another
penalty
of,
say,
$2000
and have that
paid
off
in
200
months
or
16.
5
years
from
now.
/
/
1
//
N
Jacob
B.
Dumelle
Board
Member
I,
Christan
L.
Moffett,
Clerk
of
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board,
hereby
certify
the
above
Supplemental
Statement
was
submitted
on
the ~
of
Novembe~
1972.
Christan
L.
ivloffett,
Clerk
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Boa.
6
—
99