ILLINOIS
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January16,
1973
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
#72—155
v.
ILLINOIS CENTRAL
RAILROAD
COMPANY,
a Corporation
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(BY SAMUEL T.
LAWTON,
JR.):
Motion to dismiss the above-captioned complaint has been filed
by the railroad on the basis of res judicata.
Injunction had been
entered against the railroad in the Circuit Court of Champaign County
enjoining the railroad from liknowingly,
intentionally and wLLfully
burning railroad tiesu,
The burning incident, which
is the subject
of
the present complaint, was asserted in the Champaign Circuit Court
as constituting a violation of said injunction based on a complaint
and petition for rule to show cause.
On March 30,
1972,
an Order was entered on this petition in favor
of the railroad and the rule to show cause discharged.
The contention
of the railroad is that the foregoing favorable order constitutes
res judicata so far as the present proceeding
is concerned.
The posi-
tion of the Agency
is
that the violation of the injunction recuired
a finding of wilful action whe~easthe complaint in the instant case
requires
only
a
demonstration
that
the
open
burning
was
threatened
or
allowed by
respondent
which,
of
course,
is
sufficient
to
constitute
violation of the Environmental Protection Act, Section 9(a).
In addition, we note that the railroad,
in an independent action,
entitledlllinois Central Railroad v. Environmental Protection Agency,
#72C563,
filed in the Circuit Court of Champaign County, had sought
to enjoin the Agency from prosecuting the instant complaint before
this Board premised on the concept of res judicata based on the March
30,
1972 order discharging the rule to show cause.
Order was entered by
the Circuit Court of Champaign County in the railroad~sinjunction
proceeding dismissing the complaint with prejudice and finding the
issues in favor of the Environmental Protection Agency.
Accordingly,
we
will
dismiss the rai1road~smotion to strike and dismiss this
proceeding based on the absence of res judicata as found by the Circuit
Court of Champaign County.
6
-~
501
~e
have
further
heli
that
failure
to
hold
hearing
within
stxtv
days
from
the
f~1inq
of
the
coniclaint
is not
a jurisdictional
defect
and
does
not
constitute
a
basis
for dismissal.
All other
ccntenttons
raised
in
the
motion
are
ec~ua1ly
lacking in merit.
The
mction
to
stri:~e~nd disn~ss
te
denied.
IT
IS
SO
ORDERED.
I,
Christan
Moffett,
Clerk
of
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
certify
that
the
above
Order
was
adopted
on
the
16th
Day
of
January,
1973,
by
a
vote
of
_____
to
_________
—2--
6
—
502