ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    December 5, 1972
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    v.
    )
    PCB 72—207
    COUNTY OF DU PAGE,
    a Body
    Politic and Corporate
    INTERIM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO ADD PARTIES
    (by
    Mr. Parker):
    In this enforcement proceeding, the County of DuPage is
    charged with water pollution violations during the period of
    September 22, 1970 through January
    3,
    1972 at its Nordic Park
    sewage treatment plant.
    By our Order dated August 22, 1972 we deferred action on
    a motion to strike filed by Respondent, and held in
    abeyance a
    motion
    to add the Villages of Addison and Itasca as parties,
    pending receipt of further information from Respondent.
    On October 26,
    1972, Respondent filed an amendment to the
    pending motion to add parties.
    The amendment proposes to add
    the Villages of Bensenville and Elk Grove and the City of Wood
    Dale as well as Addison and Itasca.
    In support of its motion
    to add parties, Respondent states that all municipalities are
    within the same proposed wastewater treatment region
    (see
    DuPage County Wastewater Treatment Regionalization, #70-17).
    All will be subject to a comprehensive plan affecting the
    capacity and future existence of each facility.
    Respondent
    concludes that this situation necessitates inclusion of all
    parties in this proceeding.
    Based upon our review of all papers submitted in support
    of the motion to
    add parties, we conclude that Respondent’s
    motion to add parties must be denied because there is no showing
    that these municipalities have any ownership interest in Res-
    pondent’s sewage treatment facility.
    There is no showing that
    the parties proposed to be added are responsible in any way
    for the violations alleged in the Complaint.
    The regionalization
    hearings in Respondent’s region (Region
    I) were the proper place
    to present the issues raised by the instant motion.
    In regard to Respondent’s motion to strike, we reaffirm
    our previous order deferring decision until the Board’s final
    determination of all issues presented
    in this proceeding.
    6—391

    No outstanding issues remain to be decided before the
    hearing.
    The allegations of continued violation are of such
    a serious nature as to warrant prompt determination of the
    facts.
    A hearing should take place within the shortest
    practicable time.
    ORDER
    I.
    Respondent’s motion to add parties is hereby denied
    as to each and every party in accordance with the opinion
    expressed above.
    2.
    Respondent’s motion to strike is held in abeyance,
    as ordered previously.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, certify that the ab ye Interim Opinion and Order
    was adopted on the
    ~
    day of
    __________________,
    1972, by
    avoteof
    ‘~
    to0
    .
    —2—
    6
    392

    Back to top