ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
October 17, 1972
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
V.
)
#72—206
THE RILEY COMPANY, a Delaware
)
corporation
MESSRS. WILLIAM
J. SCOTT and JAMES
T.
RUBIN,
ON BEHALF OF
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
PETERSON
& HOUPT, MR.
RICHARD HOUPT, ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT
OPINION AND ORDER CF
T-HE
BOARD
(BY SAMUEL
T.
LAWTON,
JR.)
Complaint was filed against The Riley Company on May 15,
1972,
alleging that between July
1,
1970 and January 20,
1972, Respon-
dent had operated its incinerator located in Skokie,
ILlinois,
so
as to
cause
the
discharge
of
particulates
in
violation
of
Rule
3-3:232 of the Rules and Regulations Governing the Control of Air
Pollution,
continued in effect by Section 49(c)
of the Environmental
Protection Act.
The incinerator, located at Respondent’s manu-
facturing facility, was used to dispose of scrap paper and card-
board.
On January
20,
1972, Respondent permanently sealed and shut
down its incinerator.
Public hearing was held on the complaint on September 21,
1972.
On the basis of the record we find that Respondent has violated
the Regulations,
as alleged.
At the hearing, the parties proposed
a stipulation and settlement,
to which no public comment was received.
The parties stipulated that at the rate of 100 pounds per hour,
the
incinerator emitted
.586 grains per standard cubic
foot of gas,
against an allowable maximum emission of
.35 grains per standard
cubic foot of gas.
Also stipulated was that the only notices re-
ceived by Respondent regarding its incinerator operation, were on
January 11,
1972, being a notice of possible violation from the
Environmental Protection Agency and on January 12, 1972,
being a
complaint by Cook County Environmental Control Bureau.
The Cook
County complaint was heard in the Circuit Court of Cook County on
January 17,
1972, pursuant to which,Respondent w~sassessed a fine
of $50.00 plus
$5.00 costs.
Respondent shut down its incinerator
immediately thereafter and has retained a scavenger service to dis-
pose of paper previously burned in the incinerator.
The Environmental Protection Agency states that Respondent
has cooperated with the Agency and shown good faith in shutting
5
—
673
down its incinerator upon receipt of notice,
Since we find
that Respondent has violated the above regulation, we normally
would be inclined to assess a small penalty.
However, since
Respondent has already paid a fine,
no further penalty will be
assessed.
We note that no nuisance complaint was ever filed against
Respondent, and that Respondent has ceased operation and
cooperated fully in this matter.
However, we shall order that
Respondent cease and desist from any future violations of the
Act and Rules.
This opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
of
law
of
the
Board.
IT IS
THE
ORDER
of the Pollution Control Board that Respon-
dent shall cease and desist the operation of its facility in
Skokie, Illinois so as to cause air pollution as defined in the
Environmental Protection Act, or emissions in excess of particulate
regulations contained in Rules and Regulations Governing the Control
of
Air
Pollution.
Mr.
Dumelle
dissents.
I,
Christan
Moffett,
Clerk
of
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board,
certify
that
the
above
Opinion
and
Order
was
adopted
on
the
/
7 ~
day of October, A,
D.
1972, by a vote of
~.)
to
j
—2—
5
—
674