RECE~V~D
CLERK’S OFFICE
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
 BOAJIW
IN THE MATTER OF:
 )
 STATE
 OF ILUNOIS
)
 Pollution Control Board
 PETITION OF SCHAEFER
 ENTERPRISES
 )
OF WOLF LAKE, INC.
 )
FOR ADJUSTED
 STANDARD FROM
 )
 AS
 ~OO~
 -C~Z)
 ~
35 ILL. ADM. CODE SECTION
 )
 (Adjusted Standard)
848.202(b)(5).
 )
NOTICE OF FILING
TO:
 Pollution
 Control Board
Attention: Clerk
100 West Randolph Street
James R.
 Thompson Center
Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601-3218
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that on the
 2lday ofMarch, 2005, I have forwarded
to Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk, Illinois Pollution Control Board, 100
 W.
 Randolph Street, Suite 11-
500, Chicago, IL 60601, an original
 and nine copies of Petition for an Adjustment
 to Tire
Processing Requirement of 35
 Ill.Adm. Code Section 848.202(b)(5) in the above-entitled cause.
A copy ofsaid Petition for an Adjustment
 to Tire Processing Requirement of 35
 Ill.Adm. Code
Section 848.202(b)(5) is attached hereto and provided herewith.
GOLDENBERG, MILLER, HELLER
& ANTOGNOLI, P.C.
By:___________
ebra J. Meadows, #86185660
2227
 South State Route
 157
P.O. Box 995
Edwardsville, IL 62025
(618)
656-5150
PRINTED
 ON RECYCLED PAPER
BEFORE
 THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
 CLERK’S OFFICE
IN THE
 MATTER OF:
 )
 ~‘4A~?
 24
 2005
)
 STATE
 OF ILLIN0~S
PETITION OF SCHAEFER
 ENTERPRISES
 )
 Pollution
 Control Board
OF WOLF LAKE, INC.
 )
)
 AS
FOR ADJUSTED STANDARD
 FROM
 )
 (Adjusted Standard)
35 ILL. ADM. CODE SECTION
 )
848.202(b)(5)
 )
PETITION FOR AN ADJUSTMENT TO
TIRE PROCESSING
 REQUIREMENT
OF 35 ILL.ADM. CODE
 SECTION 848.202(b)
 (5)
COMES NOW the Petitioner, Schaefer Enterprises of WolfLake, Inc., by and through its
attorneys Debra J. Meadows
 and Goldenberg, Miller,
 Heller & Antognoli, P.C.,
 and petitions the
Illinois Pollution Control Board (the Board), pursuant to Section
 28.1 ofthe Illinois Environmental
Protection Act,
 415
 ILCS 5/28.1,
 and the Board’sprocedural rules
 (35
 Ill. Adm. Code
 101 et seq.),
and for its Petition for Adjusted Standard from 35 Ill.
 Adm. Code
 848.202(b)(5)1.
A.
 Standard From Which Adjusted Standard is Sought.
Schaefer requests
 an adjusted standard from the Board’s
 14-day dry storage limitation for
used and waste tires found at 35
 Ill. Adm.
 Code 848.202(b)(5), which provides as follows:
Section
 848.202 Requirements...
135
 Ill. Adm.
 Code 848.202(b)(5) was amended
 at 16111. Reg. 3114,
 effective February
14,
 1992.
THIS FILING IS ON RECYCLED PAPER
1
(b)
 At sites at which more than 50 used orwaste tires are located
the
 owner
 or
 operator
 shall
 comply
 with
 the
 following
requirements:
(5)
 Used or waste tires received at the
 site shall not be
stored
 unless within
 14 days after the receipt of any
used
 tire
 the
 used
 tire
 is
 altered,
 reprocessed,
converted,
 covered
 or
 otherwise
 prevented
 from
accumulatingwater. All used and waste tires received
at
 the
 site
 before
 June
 1,
 1989,
 shall
 be
 altered,
reprocessed,
 converted,
 covered
 or
 otherwise
prevented
 from
 accumulating
 water
 by
 January
 1,
1992.
B.
 Statement ofApplicability
The regulation ofgeneral applicability atissue was not promulgatedtoimplenient, in whole
or in part, the requirements ofthe Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
 1251 et seq. (1988)), Safe Drinking
Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300(f) et seq. (1988)), Clean AirAct (42 U.S.C.
 7401
 et seq. (1988)), orthe
state programs
 concerning the Resource Conservation and
 Recovery Act (RCRA),
 Underground
Injection Control
 (UTC), or the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NIPDES).
C.
 Level
 of Justification
 and
 other
 Information
 or Requirements Necessary
 for An
Adjusted Standard.
The regulation of general
 applicability
 does not
 specify a
 level of justification
 or other
requirements.
 The level ofjustification specified in Section 28.1(c) ofthe Illinois Environmental
Protection
 Act states
 that the Board may grant individual adjusted standards whenever the Board
determines,
 upon adequate proof by petitioner, that
 (1) the factors
 relating to
 the petitioner are
substantially
 and significantly different from the factors relied upon by the Board in adopting the
general regulation applicable to that petitioner;
 (2) theexistence ofthose factorsjustifies
 an adjusted
standard;
 (3) the requested standard will not result in environmental or health effects substantially
2
and
 significantly more adverse than the effects considered by the Board
 in adopting the rule of
general
 applicability;
 and (4) the adjusted standard is
 consistent with any applicable
 federal
 law.
D.
 Description ofPetitioner’s Activity.
Schaefer Enterprises ofWolfLake, Inc.
 (Schaefer Enterprises)
 is located in Union County,
Illinois and has been engaged in the business ofbuying and selling salvage equipment and used and
reconditionedparts for thirty-eight (38) years.
 The business is owned and operated by the Schaefer
Family Corporation.
 Schaefer Enterprises currently employs forty three (43) full-time employees
and, during the last calendaryear, served approximately tenthousand (10,000) customers~Schaefer’s
customers are dealers and end-users ofprimarily construction and logging equipment.
As a salvagebusiness, SchaeferEnterprise’s customersoftenpurchase~inexpenesparetires
for various
 purposes regarding
 the transportation
 and/or repair of machinery
 and
 construction
equipment.
 As
 a result, thebusiness storesmanytires on their rims due to their weight and bulk.
 It
is difficult for employees to handle the tires after theyorthe equipment on which they aremounted
have been burned, submerged under water, or corroded by the elements.
 Consequently, employees
handle the tires as little as possible until they learn how the tires will be sold.
Schaefer Enterprises is registered with theIllinois Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
as a tire site with a maximum of 450 used or waste tires present at any one time.
 In this Petition,
Schaefer Enterprises hereby requests
 that
 the Board
 grant
 an
 adjustment
 from
 the dry storage
3
requirement imposed by Section
 848.202(b)(5).
 Instead, Schaefer Enterprises requests
 that it be
allowed
 to treat its tires with
 a larvicide approved by the EPA, pursuant to
 Section 848.205.2
B.
 Efforts Necessary to
 Comply.
Due
 to
 the
 long
 inventory
 cycle
 in
 the
 salvage
 business
 and
 long-term
 useful
 life of
construction equipment, Schaefer often stores inventory for long periods oftime.
 For this reason,
compliance with Section 848.202(b)(5) leaves the Petitionerwith only one alternative: constmctinga
facility large enough to store all tires, which are larger than average, in its possession.
 Thebusiness
is
 located
 in
 a
 flood
 plain.
 The estimated overall
 capital costs
 would
 exceed
 $80,000,
 and
 the
annualizedcapital and operating costs would total about $6,000. The cost ofconstructingthefacility
is increased by required compliance with regulations governing constructi~n~iirflood~piains.
 These
costs
 make it impracticable for Petitioner to undertake such construction.
Instead ofrequiringthat Schaefer maintain dry storage forall tiresheld forover fourteen (14)
days, the sameeffect would be reached by treatmentofsaidtheswith EPA-approved larvicide.
 Such
larvicides are non-hazardous and have negligible environmental
 impact.
F.
 Proposed Adjusted Standard.
The Petitionerproposes the following adjustedstandard for hTclusionin theBoard’s order in
this matter:
Schaefer Enterprises of WolfLake, Inc. Used Repair Parts and Tire Storage
 Site.
235
 Ill.
 Adm.
 Code 848.205 was amended at 16 Ill.
 Reg.
 3114, effective February
 14,
1992.
4
For a site owned and operated by SchaeferEnterprises ofWolfLake, Inc. located at Highway
3, P.O. Box
 136, WolfLake, IL 62998, the scope ofexemption and alternate management standards
applied to that facility are as follows:
a)
 Scope of Exemption.
1)
 Schaefer Enterprises ofWolfLake, Inc.
 may exclude from the cost estimate
under Section 848.404 the cost ofremoving all tirespurchased forrepair and
resale at the site.
b)
 Alternative Management Standards.
 As partofthe contingency planrequirements of
Section
 848.203, Schaefer Enterprises of WolfLake, Inc. shall:
1)
 Within
 90
 days after the effective
 date of these
 regulations
 develop and
implement a tire
 storage plan
 to
 minimize
 the threat of fire
 and mosquito
breeding.
 Such a plan shall include, but is not to be limited to, tire storage
arrangements and mosquito inspection
 and control.
2)
 Request and submit to the Agency a statement from the Illinois Department
of Public
 Health
 that
 the program
 developed
 under
 subsection
 (c)(1)
 is
adequate to control mosquito larvae and pupae; except that, ifthe Department
has not
 sent a
 statement within
 45
 days after receipt of the request, such
statement
 need
 not
 be
 submitted
 and
 the
 Agency
 shall
 make
 such
 a
determination.
 Schaefer Enterprises ofWolf Lake, Inc.
 has the burden of
 demonstrating
 that
 the
 threat of mosquito
 breeding has
 been
 minimized.
Requests for such statements ofdetermination shall be sent to:
Division ofEnvironmental Health
Office of Health Protection
Illinois Departmentof Public Health
525
 W. Jefferson Street
Springfield, Illinois 62761
This standard would exempt Schaefer Enterprises ofWolf Lake, Inc.
 from
 the 14 day tire
storage limitation and aisle spacing requirements forthose tires ofa size and
 intended usewhich-was
not envisionedin formulating therequirements ofthis Part and forwhich the management standards
5
are not amenable.
 Instead, SchaeferEnterprises ofWolfLake, Inc. would follow approved alternate
management standards.
G.
 Impact on the Environment.
Petitioner submits that no difference exists between thequantitativeandquaiitati~eiinpact
 of
Petitioner’s activity on the environment if petitioner were to comply with the regulation of general
applicability as compared to that under the proposedadjusted standard.
 Ifsuch a difference exists, it
is negligible.
If petitioner were
 to
 somehow
 comply
 with
 the
 14
 day
 tire
 storage
 limitation
 of
 35
Ill.Adm.Code
 848.206(b)
 (and
 petitioner maintains
 that
 is
 infeasible),
 all
 tires
 on
 petitioner’s
property would necessarily be brought under cover.
 Covered as such they would be dry and pose
little threat of mosquito infestation.
 However, Schaefer Enterprises cannot cover the tires without
incurring unreasonably high expenses. Ifthe petitioner attempted to cover thetireswith tarpaulins in
order to keep them drythis would be ineffectual.
 These tarps would allow rain water to seep inside
and the moisture would cause mosquito larvae to hatch.
 Schaefer Enterprises therefore decided to
examine other ways to comply with the regulations.
The petitioner had placed rock saltin the tires to eliminate breeding ofmosquitoes but upon
being advisedby the EPAthat this was not an approvedpractice this practice was stopped.
 Schaefer
Enterprises works to minimize the amount ofwater accumulating in the tires by stacking the larger
tires on the bottom in a “pyramid” effect.
 This minimizes the amount ofwatercaught in the tires and
also effectively blocks dirt and/or organic matter from blowing into the tires.
6
Schaefer Enterprises believes that if it were to cover the tires with a tarpaulin to keep them
drythis would be ineffectual.
 It is believed that waterwould accumulate on top ofthe tarpaulin and
rainwater would also seep
 inside allowing moisture for hatching of mosquito larvae.
Schaefer Enterprises cannot construct a suitable closed end building for its
 largest tires.
 A
building large enough and strong enough to house these tires would be prohibitively expensive to
build.
 The
 estimated
 over
 all
 capitol
 costs
 for
 constructing
 such
 a
 building
 would
 exceed
$80,000.00.
 Such a cost is not justified when the alternative to cover is merely to treat the tire with
an approved pesticide.
Moreover,
 moving the tires indoors
 may have an
 unexpected
 cost.
 Bringing these tires
indoors would
 make it more difficult to
 fight a fire should one occur.
 Maneuvering inside of a
building to fight fires is dangerous.
 Thepossibility ofbeing trappedby tight spaces, and the lack of
access for hoses and equipment would make it very dangerous.
An
 approved pesticide
 would
 be
 used on
 the day of the receipt
 of the
 tire
 to
 prevent
mosquito’s infestation.
 In addition, the owner/operator would inspectthe tires monthly to ascertain
whether mosquito larvae are present.
 Ifso, thetires would againbe treated orsprayed in compliance
with
 the
 regulations.
 The threat of mosquitos
 infestation would
 be minimized.
 This
 does not
constitute the continuous orongoing use ofpesticides asthe application would only takeplace after
inspection revealed a problem.
 It should also be notedthat a threat formosquitos lasts only during a
few months ofthe year when temperatures are high enough for incubation.
 An expensive building
for storage would give no advantage during spring and winter months.
Petitioner submits that under theproposed adjustedstandard the threat to the environn’ient is
no greater than under the regulation ofgeneral applicability.
7
H.
 Justification ofthe Proposed Standard.
As
 discussed above
 in paragraph
 B,
 the use of pesticide pursuant
 to
 35
 Ill.
 Adm.
 Code
848.205 will ensure that the requested standard willmeet the needs created by the Board in adopting
the rule of general applicability.
Ceasing Petitioner’s business in the area ofsalvagingused and damaged tires would
 in factbe
contrary
 to
 the
 Illinois
 Environmental
 Protection
 Act’s purpose of ensuring
 the
 collection
 and
beneficial use ofused tires.
 415 ILCS
 5/53(b)(1).
Title
 XIV,
 Used
 Tires, of the Environmental Protection
 Act was
 enacted
 to
 prevent the
accumulation ofused and waste tires, unmanaged used and waste tire sites, and theresulting threat to
the
 public
 health
 posed by
 providing
 a
 habitat
 for a
 disease-spreading
 mosquitoes
 and
 other
organisms.
 415 ILCS
 5/53(l)(2-4).
 Petitioner is along-standing, respected business organization
which is regularly monitored by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
 It is in no way the
type of“dumping site” the Act seeks to prevent.
 hi its use ofapproved pesticide pursuant to 35 Ill.
Adm.
 Code 848.205, theconcern ofinfestation is nullified.
 GrantingPetitioneran adjusted standard
will not defeat the purpose ofTitle XIV.
 In fact, the same finding states that one purpose ofthe Act
is
 to ensure that used and waste tires are collected and put
 to beneficial use or properly disposed.
Petitioner will further this purpose.
I.
 Consistency with Federal Law.
This request for an adjusted standard willnot conflict with Federal law as stated at Title 40,
Protection of the Environment, ofthe Code ofFederal Regulations.
J.
 Waiver of a Hearing on Petition.
Petitioner hereby waives its right to hearing on this
 Petition.
8
K.
 Legal Authorities.
1.
 35
 Ill. Adm. Code 848.202(b)(5).
2.
 415 ILCS
 5/28.1.
3.
 415
 ILCS
 5/53.
4.
 35 Ill. Adm. Code 848.205.
III.
 CONCLUSION
WHEREFORE,
 the
 Petitioner prays
 that
 the Pollution
 Control
 Board
 grant the
adjustment to the dry storage requirement for tire storage as set forth above.
GOLDENBERG, MILLER, HELLER &
ANTOGNOLI P.C.
~
 ~
DEBRA J. MEADOWS, #86 185660
2227 South State Route
 157
Edwardsville, Illinois
 62025
Telephone:
 618.656.5150
Facsimile:
 618.656.6230
Debra~gmha1aw.com
Attorneys for Petitioner
9