ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September 15, 1994
ERICH J. MANDEL,
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
PCB 92—33
(Enforcement)
THADDEUS G. KULPAKA,
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by C.
A. Manning):
On February 25,
1992, Erich J. Mandel filed a complaint
against Thaddeus G. Kulpaka alleging various violations of the
Environmental Protection Act.
The allegations concerned several
underground storage tanks
(“USTs”) located on property owned by
Mandel and previously owned by Kulpaka.
On July 30,
1992,
the
Board denied a motion by the respondent for summary judgment or
dismissal.
At that time the Board also struck portions of the
complaint and dismissed Counts IV and V.
On January 26,
1993,
Kulpaka filed a counterclaim against Mandel which the Board later
found was neither duplicitous or frivolous.
We therefore set the
case for hearing.
While it has been scheduled for hearing on
December 16,
1992,
March 12,
1993, November 8,
1993 and December
23,
1993, all hearings have been cancelled by the parties and no
hearings have therefore been held.
Since the cancellation of the last hearing, the Board has
had no further communications from the parties.
Accordingly, we
ordered on August 11,
1994, that the petitioner show cause why an
order dismissing this case should not be entered for lack of
prosecution.
In response, petitioner timely—filed a “Motion to
Voluntarily Dismiss”
the petition on August 24,
1994.
The complainant represents that the parties have reached a
settlement in this matter which includes an agreement that they
will jointly remediate the subject property currently owned by
Erich J.Mandel and formerly owned by Thaddeus C. Kulpaka.
Without setting forth the details, Mandel states there are
outstanding contingencies to be resolved which warrant a
dismissal without prejudice order.
Mandel further represents
that the respondent is in agreement with the dismissal of the
counterclaim.
Petitioner’s attorney certifies that he served the Motion to
Volutarily Dismiss on the respondent on August 24,
1994, and we
have received no response or objection.
Accordingly, we find
that respondent’s silence is consent to dismissal of the petition
and the counterclaim.
We therefore grant the motion and the
docket in this matter is hereby closed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
hereby certify that the above order was adopted on the/~~
day of
~
1994,
by a vote of
6
~
/)~-
~
Dorothy M. 4unn,
Clerk
Illinois Po/ilution Control Board
2