RECE1~VED
    BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    CLFpj~cQ!P(~’~
    JUL
    2
    5 ~
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
    vs
    Complainant,
    QC FINISHERS,
    INC.,
    an Illinois
    corporation,
    Respondent.
    PCB No.
    01-7
    (Enforcement
    S’IAFF.
    (Ji~1U..II~O~
    Pollution Control Board
    -
    Air)
    TO:
    Heidi
    E. Hanson
    H.E. Hanson,
    Esq.
    P.C.
    4721 Franklin Avenue
    Suite
    1500
    Western Springs,
    IL 60558-
    1720
    Mr.
    Bradley
    P. Halloran
    Hearing Officer
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    JRTC,
    Suite 11-500
    100 W.
    Randolph Street
    Chicago,
    IL.
    60601
    NOTICE
    OF
    FILING
    PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that we have
    today,
    July 25,
    2003
    filed with
    the above named persons,
    copies
    of Complainant’s Motion to Quash
    Sub oena of Cr
    s
    ~-W
    a copy
    o
    w
    i
    is
    a tached
    herewith and served upon you.
    Respectfully submitted,
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
    LISA MADIGAN
    Attorney General of the
    State of Illinois
    BY:
    ~
    PA~(JLABECKER WHEELER
    Assistant Attorney General
    Environmental Bureau
    188 W.
    Randolph St.,
    201th
    Fir.
    Chicago,
    IL 60601
    (312)
    814-1511,
    814-0608
    THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I,
    Paula Becker Wheeler,
    an Assistant Attorney General
    in this
    case,
    do certify that on this 25th day of July,
    2003,
    I caused to be
    served the foregoing Notice of Filing Motion to Quash Subpoena of
    Crystal Myers-Wilkins upon the persons named within by U.S. Mail
    to
    Heidi Hanson at the above address and in person to Bradley P. Halloran
    at the above address.
    ~
    /~/~J~
    PAULA1BECKER WHEELER

    BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
    ILLINOIS,
    Complainant,
    vs-
    )
    PCB No. 01-07
    (Enforcement
    -
    Air)
    QC FINISHERS,
    INC.,
    an
    Illinois corporation,
    Respondent.
    MOTION TO QUASH DEFENDANT’S SUBPOENA
    Complainant,
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, by LISA
    MADIGAN,
    Attorney General
    of the State of Illinois,
    respectfully
    move, pursuant to Rule 201(c)
    of the Illinois Supreme Court,
    and
    Section 101.622 of the Board’s regulations,
    that an order be
    entered upon Respondent,
    Q.C.
    Finishers, quashing the subpoena
    Respondent is~uedto Crystal Myers-Wilkins on or about July
    6,
    2003.
    In support of said Motion,
    Complainant states as follows:
    1.
    On July 14,
    2000,
    Complainant
    filed
    a complaint
    against QC FINISHERS,
    INC.
    (“QC”),
    alleging various environmental
    violations leading to and including air pollution.
    2.
    On March
    1,
    2003,
    Respondent
    filed an Answer
    to said
    Complaint with amended affirmative defenses.
    3.
    Discovery was initiated in April of 2003,
    and is
    ongoing.
    4.
    On July
    6,
    2003,
    a Subpoena for Deposition of CRYSTAL
    MYERS-WILKINS,
    an attorney for the Illinois Environmental

    Protection Agency (“Illinois EPA”)
    in the Division of Legal
    Counsel of said agency, was mailed to the Complainant’s attorney.
    5.
    Section 101.616 of the Illinois Pollution Control Board
    (“Board”)
    rules,
    35 Ill. Adm.
    Code 101.616(a),
    states:
    (a)
    All relevant information and information
    calculated to lead to relevant
    information is discoverable excluding
    those materials that would be protected
    from disclosure
    in the courts of this
    State pursuant to statute, Supreme Court
    Rules or common law,
    and materials
    protected form disclosure under 35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code
    130.
    6.
    Illinois Supreme Court Rule 201(b) (2),
    Ill.
    S.
    Ct.
    Rule 201(b) (2),
    states:
    Pri~i1ege
    and
    Work
    Product.
    All matters that
    are privileged against disclosure on the
    trial,
    including privileged communications
    between a party or his agent and the attorney
    for the party,
    are privileged against
    disclosure through any discovery procedure.
    Material prepared by or for a party in
    preparation for trial is subject to discovery
    only if
    it does not contain or disclose the
    theories, mental
    impressions,
    or litigation
    plans of the party1s attorney. The court may
    apportion the cost involved in originally
    securing the discoverable material,
    including
    when appropriate a reasonable attorney’s
    fee,
    in such manner as is
    just.
    7.
    In Shapo v.
    Tires
    ‘n Tracks,
    Inc.,
    336 Ill.App.3d
    387,
    393
    (1St
    Dist,
    2002)
    ,
    the attorney client privilege as:
    Where
    any legal advice of any kind is
    sought from a
    professional
    legal advisor in his capacity as
    such,
    the
    communications relating to that purpose, made in confidence
    by the client,
    are protected from disclosure by himself or
    the legal adviser.
    2

    8.
    Respondent has available and has already subpoenaed
    Chris Romaine,
    an inspector with the Illinois EPA.
    Other witnesses
    available to the Respondent include Gary Beckstead,
    an Illinois
    EPA employee in the Air Quality Section, Valerie Brodsky,
    an
    Illinois EPA employee in Permits, and Harish Narayeov,
    an Illinois
    EPA Regional Manager,
    all experts or witnesses
    in the areas of air
    VOM emissions and violations alleged in the Complaint.
    9.
    Crystal Myers-Wilkins
    is not an expert in the areas
    alleged as violations
    in the complaint,
    therefore any testimony by
    her to this issue would be irrelevant.
    10.
    Crystal Myers-Wilkins
    is an attorney who has been
    working on the behalf of the Illinois EPA and with the Illinois
    Attorney General’s Office on this case.
    11.
    The Illinois EPA and the Illinois Attorney General’s
    office have an attorney-client relationship
    in that this case was
    brought
    by the Illinois Attorney General at the
    request
    of the
    Illinois EPA, pursuantto
    Section 31 of the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Act (“~~t~’),
    ~41~
    ILCS—5-/-3-1-_4ZQ02~.
    12.
    Any relevant testimony Crystal Myers-Wilkins might
    possibly offer in this matter would be privileged by either the
    attorney-client privilege or the attorney work-product doctrine as
    those terms are defined in applicable case law and Illinois
    Supreme Court Rules.
    3

    13.
    Because this material is privileged,
    it
    is not
    discoverable
    in accordance with Section 101.616 of the Board
    rules,
    35
    Ill. Adm.
    Code 101.616(a).
    WHEREFORE,
    for the foregoing reasons, Complainant
    respectfully requests the Board quash Respondent’s July
    6,
    2003
    Subpoena with regard to Crystal Myers-Wilkins,
    without leave to
    reinstate.
    Respectfully submitted,
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
    by LISA MADIGAN,
    Attorney General of the
    State of Illinois,
    MATTHEW
    J.
    DUNN,
    Chief
    Environmental Enforcement
    /
    Asbestos Litigation Division
    By:
    ~
    Paula Becker Wheeler
    Assistant Attorney General
    Environmental Bureau
    188 W.
    Randolph ~
    20th
    Flr
    Chicago, Illinois
    60601
    (312)
    814-1511
    4

    Back to top