ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April
20,
1995
RIVERSIDE LABORATORIES,
INC.,
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
PCB 90—165
)
(Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J.
Yi):
Riverside Laboratories Inc.
(Riverside)
and the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
(IEPA),
on October 28,
1994,
filed a joint status report pursuant to the Board’s order of
September 15,
1994,
a motion for continuance of stay and a waiver
of this permit appeal decision deadline until October
6,
1995.
In the status report, Riverside states that related
consolidated variance petitions are also pending before this
Board in PCB 90-164 and PCB 91-161.
This permit appeal and the
related consolidated variance petitions all pertain to 35 Ill.
Adm. Code Part 218
(Papercoating regulations)
as applied to
Riverside.
Further, Riverside states that currently pending
before the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(U.S.EPA)
is its request for review of the Federal Implementation
Plan
(FIP)
for ozone which specifically challenges the
papercoating limitations as applied to Riverside,
and that
U.S.EPA has granted Riverside a stay of enforcement of the
papercoating limitations pending final review.’
On December 16,
1993
a Notice of the Proposed Rulemaking was
published in the Federal Register and that the relevant public
comment period ended January 18,
1994.
(58 Fed.
Reg.
65688
(December 16,
1993).)
A public hearing was held by U.S.EPA on
April
6,
1994 and the comment period was extended until May 16,
1994 at the request of Riverside.
The status report states that
the final rule has not been issued.
Riverside and the Agency
agreed that hearings in this matter should be held pending final
U.S.EPA action.
As of April
14,
1995, U.S.
EPA has not issued a
final rulemaking in this matter but anticipates that the final
‘The Board regulations at 35
Ill.
Adm. Code 218.103(a) (2)
stays the effectiveness of Part 218 as applied to each FIP
appellant to the extent that each appellant receives a stay of
the FIP from the U.S.EPA.
2
rule will be sent to the Administrator to be signed within the
next few weeks.
Both the Agency and Riverside believe that this
matter should be stayed pending U.S. EPA’s finalization of the
FIP.
Riverside filed
a Waiver of Decision Deadline and requested
a stay until October
6,
1995.
The Board grants a stay in this
matter until June 15,
1995, which allows the Board sufficient
time,
if necessary,
to process this case prior to the new
decision deadline.2
Riverside and the Agency shall file another
status report,
or any other appropriate motion,
on or before June
8,
1995.
That filing and any future requests for continuation of
stay and status reports should be directed to the assigned
hearing officer, with a copy being filed with the Board.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above order was adopted on the
~
day of ________________________,
1995,
by a vote of
7~•.
.1
2Due to the regulatory notice requirements, the time
required to conduct the hearing and deliberate the matter, the
Board requires
a 120 day period of time between the stay and the
decision due date in the matter.
I
Clerk
lution Control Board