ELLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July 30,
1992
DAVID L.
DRAVIS and
)
MARGO DRAVIS,
-
)
Complainant,
PCB 90—201
v.
)
(Enforcement)
M
& D AG, JERRY MCGINN and
)
BERT DAVIS,
)
Respondent.
WILLIAM R.
SHIRi~APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE COMPLAINANT.
WILLIAM A. BURCH APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT.
OPINION
AND
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by G.
T.
Girard):
On May 8,
1992,
David and Margo Dravis filed a complaint
with the Illinois Po1luti•~nControl Board
(Board)
alleging that
the respondents had violated Section 23 of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act.
(Ill. Rev.
Stat.
1991,
ch.
111
1/2,
par.
1023.)
On April 29,
1992,
a hearing was held in Morrison, Whiteside
County,
Illinois.
At that hearing an agreement which had been
signed by the parties was submitted.
The agreement is a
“resolution of all of the matters noted in the complaint and it
is a written signed settlement agreement”.
(Tr. at 3.)
The
parties jointly ask that the Board accept the agreement and make
the terms and conditions of the agreement part of a Board Order.
(Tr. at 3.)
The agreement states that the parties “have conferred and
reached a mutual agreement concerning all issues alleged in the
complaint”.
(Exhibit 1, at 1.)
The agreement then sets forth
several steps that the respondent will take to alleviate any
potential noise emissions~beyond the boundaries of respondent’s
property.
However,
the agreement does not set forth a fine to be
paid by the respondent.
The Board finds the Settlement Agreement acceptable under 35
Ill. Adm. Code 103.180.
This settlement in no way affects
respondent’s responsibility to comply with any federal, state or
local regulations,
including but not limited to the Act and the
Board’s pollution control regulations.
This opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law in this matter.
0135-0123
ORDER
The Board hereby accepts the settlement agreement signed by
all parties.
The settlement agreement is incorporated by
reference as though fully set forth herein.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Section 41 of the Environmental Protection Act
(Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1991,
ch.
111 1/2,
par.
1041)
provide for the appeal of
final orders of the board within 35 days.
The Rules of the
Supreme Court of Illinois establish filing requirements.
(But
see also
35 Ill.
Adin.
Code 101.246, Motions for Reconsideration,
and Castenada v.
Illinois Human Rights Commission
(1989),
132
I1l.2d 304,
547 N.E.2d 437).
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the a ove opinion and order was
adopted on the
~
day of
,
1992,
by a vote1of
Dorothy M. G~n, Clerk
Illinois P0
ution Control Board
0135-0J2~