ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
February 1,
1996
CONSOLIDATED DISTILLED
)
PRODUCTS, INC.,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
PCB 96-39
)
(LIST Fund)
OFFICE OF THE STATE FIRE
)
MARSHAL,
)
)
Respondent.
)
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by J. Yi):
This maiter is before thcBoard on a petition for review filed by Consolidated Distilled
Products, Inc.
(Consolidated) on August
14,
1995.
Consolidated is appealing a July
10,
1995
final determination ofthe Office ofState Fire Marshal (OSFM) concerning Consolidated’s
eligibilityto access the Underground Storage Tank Fund.
On August 24.
1995 the Board
accepted this matter for hearing.
On October 31,
1995, OSFM filed a general appearancebefore theBoard.
OnNovember
6,
1995, OSFM filed a motion
to dismiss
Consolidated’s petition for review for lack ofjurisdiction
and insufficiency ofthe pleadings.
OSFM stated that it was never served by Consolidated as
requiredby the Board’s procedural rules at 35
Ill. Adm. Code
107.123.
Citing to Mr.
“C” Food &
Liquor v.
Office ofthe State Fire Marshal, PCB 94-387, (January 11,
1995), OSFM requested the
Board to
dismiss the action due to Consolidated’s failure to serve OSFM the petition.’
Additionally, OSFM argues that the petition is insufficient pursuant to the Board’s procedural
rules at 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 107. 122.
In ourorder ofDecember 7,
1995 we denied the OSFM’s motion to dismiss
and directed
Consolidated to file an amended petition curing suchdeficiencies on or before January
5,
1996.
Consolidated was also directed to serve the amended petition on OSFM pursuant to 35 Ill.
Adm.
Code 107.123.
The Board also stated that ifConsolidated failed to timely file an amended
petition or any other appropriate motion, this matter will be subject to dismissal.
As ofthe date ofthis order Consolidated has not filed an amended petition or any other
motion.
Therefore, pursuant to our previous order, we dismiss the petition and close this docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
‘In Mr.
“C” Food & Liquorthe Board found that the petition was insufficient as filed and that the
petition contained no evidence that the OSFM has been served with notice ofthe petition’s filing
as
is
required
by
Section
107.123.
The Board
directed
petitioner to
file
an
amended
petition
curing the petition deficiencies but did not
dismiss the petition.
Unlike here, in Mr.
“C”
Food &
Liquorthe OSFM did not file a motion to dismiss for theinadequacies ofthe petition.
2
Section 41
oftheEnvironmental Protection Act (415 JLCS 5/40.1) provides for the appeal
offinal Board orders
within
35
days ofservice ofthis decision.
The Rules ofthe
Supreme Court
ofillinois establish filing requirements.
(But see also, 35
111.
Adm. Code
101 .246, Motions for
Reconsideration.)
I. DorothyM.
Gunn, Clerk ofthe Illinois?ollution Control Board,
hereby certify that the
above order wasadopted on the~
day of___________
,
1996, by a vote of
7t’
p~C~
A.J~
DorothyM.
Øi,Lnn,
Clerk
Illinois Pollutión Control Board