ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August 19, 2004
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Complainant,
v.
EDWARD and BETTY JO CAIN and
EDWARD CAIN d/b/a CAIN ROOFING
COMPANY,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
AC 05-7
(IEPA No. 347-04-AC)
(Administrative Citation)
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by A.S. Moore):
On July 19, 2004, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency) timely filed an
administrative citation against Edward and Betty Jo Cain and Edward Cain d/b/a Cain Roofing
Company (respondents).
See
415 ILCS 5/31.1(c) (2002); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.202(c). For the
reasons below, the Board accepts respondents’ petition to contest the administrative citation.
Under the Environmental Protection Act (Act) (415 ILCS 5 (2002)), an administrative
citation is an expedited enforcement action brought before the Board seeking civil penalties that
are fixed by statute. Administrative citations may be filed only by the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency (Agency) or, if the Agency has delegated the authority, by a unit of local
government, and only for limited types of alleged violations at sanitary landfills or unpermitted
open dumps.
See
415 ILCS 5/3.305, 3.445, 4(r), 21(o), (p), 31.1, 42(b)(4), (4-5) (2002); 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 108.
The Agency alleges that respondents violated Sections 21(p)(1), (p)(3), and (p)(7) of the
Act (415 ILCS 5/21(p)(1), (p)(3), (p)(7) (2002)). According to the Agency’s administrative
citation, respondents violated these provisions of the Act by causing or allowing the open
dumping of waste resulting in (1) litter; (2) open burning; and (3) the deposition of general or
clean construction or demolition debris at respondents’ site. Respondents’ site is allegedly
located at 1102 North County Road 900 N, Tolono, Champaign County. The Agency asks the
Board to impose a $4,500 civil penalty on respondents for these three alleged violations.
As required, the Agency served the administrative citation on respondents within “60
days after the date of the observed violation.” 415 ILCS 5/31.1(b) (2002);
see also
35 Ill. Adm.
Code 108.202(b). On August 9, 2004, respondents timely filed a petition to contest the
administrative citation.
See
415 ILCS 5/31.1(d) (2002); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.204(b).
Respondents state that the alleged violations were not caused or allowed by respondents or,
alternatively, resulted from uncontrollable circumstances. In support, respondents allege that
2
their past employees’ lack of fluency in English “caused misunderstandings to occur in the
manner of disposal of debris.” Petition at 1. The Board accepts the petition for hearing.
The Board directs the hearing officer to proceed expeditiously to hearing. The hearing
officer will give the parties at least 21 days written notice of the hearing.
See
35 Ill. Adm. Code
108.300;
see also
415 ILCS 5/31.1(d)(2) (2002). By contesting the administrative citation,
respondents may have to pay the hearing costs of the Board and the Agency.
See
415 ILCS
5/42(b)(4-5) (2002); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.500. A schedule of the Board’s hearing costs is
available from the Clerk of the Board and on the Board’s Web site at www.ipcb.state.il.us.
See
35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.504.
Respondents may withdraw their petition to contest the administrative citation at any time
before the Board enters its final decision. If respondents choose to withdraw their petition, they
must do so in writing, unless they do so orally at hearing.
See
35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.208. If
respondents withdraw their petition after the hearing starts, the Board will require respondents to
pay the hearing costs of the Board and the Agency if the Agency prevails.
See id.
at 108.500(c).
The Agency has the burden of proof at hearing.
See
415 ILCS 5/31.1(d)(2) (2002); 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 108.400. If the Board finds that the Agency violated Sections 21(p)(1), (p)(3), and
(p)(7), the Board will impose civil penalties on respondents. The civil penalty for violating any
provision of Section 21(p) is $1,500 for each violation of each such provision, except that the
penalty amount imposed will be $3,000 for each violation of any provision of Section 21(p) that
is a respondent’s second or subsequent adjudicated violation of that provision.
See
415 ILCS
5/42(b)(4-5) (2002); 35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.500. However, if the Board finds that a respondent
“has shown that the violation resulted from uncontrollable circumstances, the Board shall adopt a
final order which makes no finding of violation and which imposes no penalty.” 415 ILCS
5/31.1(d)(2) (2002);
see also
35 Ill. Adm. Code 108.500(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the Board
adopted the above order on August 19, 2004, by a vote of 4-0.
Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board