ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
March 25,
1993
)
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
QUANTUM CHEMICAL
CORPORATION
)
AS 93-1
USI DIVISION
)
(Adjusted Standard)
)
)
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J.
C. Marlin):
On February 11,
1993, Quantum Chemical Corporation (Quantum)
filed a petition for adjusted standard from certain water quality
standards found at
35 Ill. Adm. Code 304.120(c).
Newspaper
notice was published on February
18,
1993.
On February 25,
1993,
a request for hearing was filed by Donald Bekker of Morris,
Illinois.
The request for hearing was granted by Board order on
March 11,
1993.
The Board finds the petition does not provide enough
information to comply with the requirements of Section 28.1(c) of
the Environmental Protection Act
(Act)
or with 35 Ill.
Adm.
Code
106.705 regarding the contents of a petition for adjusted
standard.
(415 ILCS 5/28.1(c)
(1992).)~
Section 28.1(c) (1)
of the Act requires the petitioner for an
adjusted standard to provide adequate proof that the factors
relating to it are substantially and significantly different from
those relied on by the Board in adopting the regulation.
Additionally, Section 28.1(c) (2)
of the Act requires the
petitioner to provide adequate proof that the existence of
its
different factors justifies an adjusted standard.
Quantum asserts that federal effluent guidelines for the
Organic Chemical, Plastic and Synthetic Fiber
(OCPSF)
Industry
TSS limits, pursuant to 40 CFR 414.41, are more appropriately
applied to its Outfall 005.
Quantum also asserts that 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 304.120, which establishes effluent limitations for
“deoxygenating wastes” and specifically 35 Ill. Adm. Code
304.120(c), which sets TSS limits for effluents discharging at a
dilution ratio of less than five to one, have been improperly
applied to the discharge of Outfall 005.
35 Ill. Adm. Code
304.120 reads in part:
Section 304.120
Deoxygenating Wastes
Except as provided in Section 306.103, all effluents
containing deoxygenating wastes shall meet the
1The Act was formerly codified at 1991,
Ill.Rev.Stat.
ch.
Ill 1/2 par. 1001
~.
~q.
01 L~.O-03l
9
following standards:
c)
No effluent whose dilution ratio is less than five
to one shall exceed 10 mg/l of BOD5 or 12 mg/i of
suspended solids,
except that sources employing
third—stage treatment lagoons shall be exempt from
this subsection
(c) provided all of the following
conditions are met:
A portion of Quantum’s justification for receiving an adjusted
standard appears to be based on the idea that the nature of the
TSS loading at Outfall 005
is fundamentally different from the
types of loadings anticipated by the Board when 35 Ill. Adm. Code
304.120 was promulgated. The Board questions whether Quantum has
provided sufficient information for the Board to evaluate its
request.
An unsupported statement that polyolefins do not exert a
biological oxygen demand
(Exh.
F at 7)
coupled with the statement
that the suspended solids from Outfall 005 contain an average of
80
polymer (polyolefins)
(Exh.
F at 5) does not provide
sufficient information for a Board decision.
Section 28.1(c) (3) of the Act requires the petitioner to
give adequate proof that the adjusted standard,
if granted, will
not result in substantially and significantly more adverse
environmental or health effects then the rule of general
applicability.
35 Ill. Adm. Code 106.705(g)
requires the
petitioner to demonstrate the level of environmental impact
predicted to result from the proposed adjusted standard.
Quantum has offered Exhibit F to fulfill the above
requirements.
Exhibit F contains information on Outfall 005
effluent characteristics, Aux Sable Creek and Illinois River
stream characteristics; a literature review on the water quality
effects of suspended solids; and predictions of incremental
increases in TSS in Aux Sable Creek and the Illinois River under
storm and low flow conditions if the adjusted standard is
granted.
Exhibit F states that “since the polyolefins are
biochemically inert, they will not accumulate in aquatic life
tissue and thus offer no potential for toxicity through the
ingestion of aquatic life exposure route.
In terms of water
contact recreation, the lack of toxicity of the polyolefins
assures that there is no potential for adverse human health
effects due to exposure to these TSS.”
(Exh.
F at 16.)
The Board notes that Quantum has provided no data to support
the assertion that polyolefins are nontoxic or that the suspended
2
01
~0-0320
solids, not just polyolefins,
in Outfall 005 have not or will not
impact the aquatic life of Aux Sable Creek or the Illinois River.
The petition also does not contain information on the biological
nature of Aux Sable Creek and the Illinois River.
Based on the above, the Board requests that Quantum file an
amended petition on or before May 31,
1993, with the following
information:
1.
A description of the type of suspended solids loadings
anticipated by the Board in promulgation of 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 304.120 and specifically Section 304.120(c).
(See,
Section 28.1(c) (1)
of the Act).
2.
Data indicating the 5-day biochemical oxygen demand
(BOD5)
of Outfall 005 effluent during all types of flow,
especially
during low flow and storm events.
3.
Data indicating the BOD5 and dissolved oxygen content of Aux
Sable Creek and the Illinois River under varying flow
conditions, especially low flow and storm events.
4.
A more detailed description,
complete with specific data,
of
the composition of Outfall 005 TSS.
5.
Scientific data regarding the toxicity, biological oxygen
demand, and biodegradation of polyolefins.
6.
Scientific data regarding the toxicity of the effluent of
Outfall 005.
7.
Scientific and historical data regarding the biological
nature of Aux Sable Creek and the Illinois River near the
confluence of AUX Sable Creek.
8.
A discussion, with supporting data,
to indicate whether the
following conditions
(taken from Exh. F description of
potential water quality impacts of suspended solids in
streams; page 8) have been observed in Aux Sable Creek or in
portions of the Illinois River affected by Aux Sable Creek:
a.
Increases in turbidity, resulting in decreased growth
of aquatic plant life;
b
Blanketing of the bottom of the stream,
limiting or
preventing the growth of benthic invertebrate
organisms;
c.
Impacts on fish; either mortality or reduced growth
rate and disease resistance;
d.
Prevention of successful development of fish eggs and
3
ORO-0321
larvae, due to blanketing of the stream bottom with
sediment;
e.
Modification of the natural movement and migrations of
fish;
f.
Reduction of the available food supply for fish
(e.g.,
plankton); and
g.
Reduced efficiency in catching fish.
9.
A discussion, with supporting documents, of whether the
conditions in 8(a)
—
(g),
above, might be expected if the
adjusted standard for TSS is granted.
Failure to file an amended petition on or before May 31,
1993,
providing additional
information, this matter may be subject to
dismissal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above order was adopted on the
~
day of
____________________,
1993, by a vote of
(7
~
~.
/J~1~)
Dorothy M.,4.inn, Clerk
Illinois Pb~lutionControl Board
4
Of
i~O-0322