ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
May 7,
1992
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
PETITION OF THE STIFFEL COMPANY
)
AS 92-1
FOR ADJUSTED STANDARD FROM
)
(Adjusted Standard)
35
ILL. ADM. CODE PART 218,
)
SUBPART
F
)
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J.
C. Marlin):
This matter comes before the Board on the Agency’s April
23,
1992 motion to extend the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
(Agency)
response date by sixty days.’
Section 106.714(a)
of the
Board’s procedural
rules provides that
an Agency
response to
a
petition for adjusted standard is due 30 days after the filing of
the petition.
(35 Ill. Adm. Code 106.714(a).)
The Agency asserts
that the Stiffel Company has no objection to the extension.
The
Agency also asserts that Stiffel has a compliance plan pending with
the Agency that negates the need for an adjusted standard.
Prior to a determination on the merits of the motion for an
extension, however, the Board wishes clarification on a threshold
issue.
The Board directs the Agency and the Stiffel Company to
submit explanations as to why, if a facility is out of compliance,
a compliance plan
by
itself
“negates the need”
for an adjusted
standard or other relief from the Board.
The explanations are to
be filed with the Board on or before May 15,
1992.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Dorothy N.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, do hereby certify that the above order was adopted on the
_____________
day of
,-7T1
(~
,
1992, by a vote of
/
(
7/
(~j/
/
~
~
Dorothy M. G~4~n,Clerk
Illinois Pol~lutionControl Board
The Board notes that the Agency filed an identical “motion
instanter”
for
a
sixty-day
extension
of
time
within
which
to
respond on April 30,
1992.
I
33—32