ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
March
16, 1995
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Complainant,
AC 94—73
V.
)
(IEPA No.
415-94-AC)
(Administrative Citation)
STACY B. HESS,
)
)
Respondent.
MELANIE A. JARVIS,
ASSISTANT COUNSEL, APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;
STACY B. HESS APPEARED PRO SE.
CONCURRING OPINION
(by
3.
Ii):
I agree with the outcome and reasoning expressed in the
majority opinion.
However,
I concurred because the majority
opinion does not find a violation on the evidence of litter in
the record other than the used tires.
The administrative citation issued by the Agency alleges
a
single violation of Section 21(p) (1)
of the Act.
(415 ILCS
5/21(p)(1).)
Section 2l(p)(l)
of the Act prohibits open dumping
resulting in litter.
In St.
Clair CountY v.
Louis Mund,
(August
22,
1991), AC 90-64,
125 PCB 381, the Board adopted the
definition of litter contained in the Litter Control Act:
“litter”
means any discarded,
used or unconsumed substance
or waste.
“Litter” may include, but is not limited to, any
garbage,
trash,
refuse, debris..
.
abandoned vehicle.
.
.
or
anything else of an unsightly or unsanitary nature which has
been discarded,
abandoned or otherwise disposed of
improperly.
(Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1990 supp.,
ch.
38, par.
86.3.)
(415 ILCS
105/3.
The Agency offered evidence of litter into the record
through the use of the eleven photographs taken by the Agency
inspector and the inspectors direct testimony as to what is
depicted in those photographs.’
The Agency inspector testified
‘The photographs were entered into the record as Group Exhibit
#7 and the inspectors testimony can be found on pages 16-23
of the
transcript of the hearing held on January 26,
1995.
that he observed by direct observations the following litter at
the site; white goods,
demolition debris,
general refuse,
old
derelict vehicles,
scrap metal and used tires.
The Board
pursuant to Section 31.1(d) (2)
of the Act shall adopt an order
finding violation if,
based on the record, the alleged violation
occurred.
(415 ILCS 5/31.1(d) (2)
(1992).)
In determining
whether a violation has occurred the Board is directed by the Act
to weigh the evidence presented by the Agency in the record which
demonstrates the alleged violation.
Here,
the Agency alleged a
violation of Section 21(p) (1)
of the Act that provides that no
person shall cause or allow the open dumping of any waste in a
manner which results in litter.
The Agency presented evidence of
litter consisting of used tires, white goods, demolition debris,
general refuse,
old derelict vehicles and scrap metal.
I would
have included in finding a violation of Section 21(p) (1)
of the
Act all the evidence in the record that demonstrates litter.
Therefore,
I respectfully concur.
Jos
Boarp Member
I, Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, her~ycertify that t
above concurring opinion was filed
on the
II~-~
day of
___________________,
1995.
-2
I
Dorothy N. ~nn,
Clerk
Illinois P~1utionControl Board