ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    September 18, 2003
     
    PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, )
     
      
      
      
      
      
      
    )
    Complainant, )
     
      
      
      
      
      
      
    )
    v. ) PCB 01-7
     
      
      
      
      
      
      
    ) (Enforcement - Air)
    QC FINISHERS Inc., )
     
      
      
      
      
      
      
    )
    Respondent. )
     
    ORDER OF THE BOARD (by M.E. Tristano):
     
    On June 19, 2003, the Board issued an order that granted in part the People of the State of
    Illinois’ (People) motion to strike several of QC Finishers, Inc., (respondent) affirmative
    defenses. On July 31, 2003, respondent filed a motion (Mot.) asking the Board to reconsider the
    June 19 order. On August 28, 2003, the People filed a response in opposition to the motion for
    reconsideration.
     
    In ruling upon a motion for reconsideration, the Board is to consider factors including,
    but not limited to, error in the previous decision and facts in the record which were overlooked.
    35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.246(d). In Citizens Against Regional Landfill v. County Board of
    Whiteside, PCB 92 -156 (Mar. 11, 1993), the Board stated that “the intended purpose of a motion
    for reconsideration is to bring to the court’s attention newly-discovered evidence which was not
    available at the time of the hearing, changes in the law, or errors in the court’s previous
    application of the existing law.” Korogluyan v. Chicago Title & Trust Co., 213 Ill. App. 3d 622,
    572 N.E. 2d 1154 (1st Dist. 1992).
     
    The Board finds that the motion for reconsideration does not present the Board with new
    evidence, a change in law, or any other reason to conclude that the Board’s June 19, 2003
    decision was in error. Nothing in the motion to reconsider convinces the Board that an “error in
    the decision” was made. Further, the Board finds that the motion to reconsider does not point to
    any “facts in the record which are overlooked,” or any other reason to conclude that the Board’s
    decision was in error. Therefore, the motion to reconsider is denied. The parties are directed to
    expeditiously proceed to hearing.
     
    IT IS SO ORDERED.

     
    2
     
     
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board, certify that the Board
    adopted the above order on September 18, 2003, by a vote of 5-0.
     
     
      
      
      
      
      
     
    Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
     
     

    Back to top