Illinois Pollution Control Board
May 30, 1972
CITY OF ARCOLA
)
v.
)
PCB 72—18
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Mr. Voris
D. Seaman for Petitioner
Mr. Dennis K. Muncy for the Environmental Protection Agency
Opinion of the Board
(by Mr. Aldrich):
On January 10,
1972 the City of~Arcolafiled a petition requesting
a variance from the July
1,
1972,
date for complying with the water
quality standards of
SWB—14,
A hearing was held May 17, 1972.
On March
7,
1972,
the Board adopted Section 404, Chapter
3,
“Water
Regulations”, which in effect postponed the date of meeting the
effluent standards in SWB-14 until December 31,
1973, whereas
Arcola anticipates completion of planned improvements in its sewage
treatment facilities by November 1,
1973, thus mooting the need for
Petitioner~svariance request. However, the Agency~srecommendation con-
tained a number of allegations respecting existing violations, which
we construe as
a counter—complaint.
The hearing brought to light:
1)
that a single breakdown in chlori~
nation had occurred which continued
2 days and
4 hours;
2)
that
the sewage plant operator is receiving additional training at
Petitioner’s expense to qualify him to operate the plant;
3)
that
the City has examined its sewer lines for defi~ienciesin structure.
The only problem of immediate concern is that the holding lagoon
to which the treated sludge is pumped is nearly full of settleable
solids and no rite has been found that will accept the sludge which
must soon be removed.
Though we have said that the variance request
is moot,
the sludge disposal problem
until solved,
involves a
threat of pollution.
We support the position of the Agency that the
city must diligently pursue the matter and find a suitable site
at the earliest practicable date.
In a pre—hearing conference the Agency and City reached agreement
on the main points requiring action by the City.
They
are covered
in the Order.
4
—
635
ORDER
1.
The City of Arcola shall have
a qualified operator
for its
sewage treatment plant and provide him with
all necessary
training.
2.
The City of Arcola shall obtain any necessary equipment for the
plant
s laboratory.
3.
The City of Arcola shall complete the study of infiltration
sources to the sewer system and remedy them insofar as possible.
4.
The City of Arcola shall diligently pursue the matter of
a
suitable disposal site for the sludge from
its lagoon and report
its plan to the Agency at the
earliest practicable date and in
any case before the threat of overflow of
the
laqoon is
imminent.
I,
Christan L.
Moffett,
C1c~rk of
the
Pollutior
C~:rtrol
Boa;d,
certify
that
the
Board
adopt~d~
the
ar~v~
J~’~
day
~
1972,
by
a
vote
4
—
636