ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
March
22, 1973
CHICAGO HEIGHTS GRAY IRON FOUNDRY,
INC.
)
v.
)
PCB 73—22
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Steven C.
Bonaguidi, Assistant Attorney General, on behalf of the
Environmental Protection. Agency.
Maurino
R.
Richtori, on behalf of the Chicago Heights Gray Iron
Foundry,
Inc.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Seaman):
This
is a Petition For Variance filed by the Chicago Heights
Gray Iron Foundry,
Inc. with the Environmental Protection Agency,
hereinafter “Agency” on January
22,
1973.
Petitioner requests a
variance from Rule 3-3.111 of the Rules and Regulations governing
the control of air pollution continued effective by Section 49(c)
of the Environmental Protection Act (Illinois Revised Statutes,
1971,
ch.
111 1/2, Section
1049(c)).
The Petitioner believes
that compliance with the above provision would constitute an
arbitrary and unreasonable hardship because of its current
financial difficulty.
It alleges it is on the brink of bankruptcy
due to the embezzlement of $120,000 by a trusted
employee.
The
Petitioner requests a variance for six
(6) months after the time
certain control equipment is delivered and installed at his factory
in order for the Petitioner
to make performance tests.
The Petitioner
estimates the equipment will be delivered between May
8 and May 22,
1973 and that it should take less than one week to install same.
Chicago Heights Gray Iron Foundry,
Inc., operates a family
facility at the above location for melting cast iron
(scrap and
pig iron)
aking a gray-iron casting.
It is
a small operation,
melting on
twice a week,
usually on Wednesday and Saturday mornings
between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 9:30 A.M.,
just an hour and
one half operation.
The corporation has only ten
(10)
employees,
excluding office personnel.
The amount of tons melted on each of
said days is between six to ten tons only.
For the past several
years,
this small family operation has been on the brink of bank-
ruptcy caused by the embezzlement of one of their trusted employees,
John Wozny, manager of said operation.
As
a result of the indictment
by the Internal Revenue Service,
he
is serving a prison term at
Sandstone, Minnesota.
However, civilly,
the corporation did file
suit against him in chancery.
The name and number of this case is
as follows:
Chicago Heights Gray Iron Foundry,
Inc.,
Plaintiff,
vs. John Wozny, Defendant,
Case No.
72 CH 1094.
7
—
389
In conclusion, we find an obvious voluntary effort on the
part of the Petitioner
to comply with the Environmental Protection
Act.
The Agency does point out, however, that the Petitioner’s
control program as presently constituted is insufficient to meet
the
requirements
of Rule 203(a)
of the PCB regulations.
We
feel
in granting this variance that the Petitioner will, now duly
notified, meet those requirements as soon as possible.
Further,
it impresses
us that the Agency has received no complaints concerning
the Petitioner’s operations.
This opinion constitutes the findings of
fact and conclusions
of law of
the
Board.
IT IS
THE
ORDER of
the Pollution Control Board:
1.
The
variance be granted only until August 15,
1973.
2.
The Petitioner, by August 15,
1973,
submit its stack test
results to the Agency.
I, Christan Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Boar
certify that the above order was adopted on the
~
day ofm
1973, by
a vote of
‘4—c:~
Christan Moffett, Clerk/V
Illinois Pollution Con1~r~O.ABoard
7
—
390