ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
June
22,
1979
VILLAGE OF SAUGET,
Petitioner,
V.
)
PCB 79—88
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Dumelle):
Petitioner, has requested
a variance from the effluent
limitations in Rule 408(a) of Chapter
3: Water Pollution
pertaining to lead,
nickel, and oils,
fats and greases.
Since Petitioner has already received
a variance from the
standard for oils,
fats and greases
(See Village of Sauget V.
EPA,
PCB 77—136,
June
22,
1978,
30 PCB 479),
Petitioner is requesting
a variance from paragraph
2(a)
of the Board’s Order dated
June
22,
1978,
The Agency has recommended that a variance
be granted.
No hearing was held.
Petitioner has been operating a physical—chemical
wastewater treatment plant since July,
1977.
The plant
treats
approximately
9 million gallons of wastewater per
day,
Most of this wastewater originates with
9 industries
located
within the village.
Petitioner is the lead municipality
of the American Bottoms
Regional Treatment Authority which
is constructing
and will operate a regional sewage treatment
facility.
This regional facility will accept Petitioner’s
wastewater,
in conjunction with sewage from surrounding
communities,
The regional facility should be completed and
operational by June
30,
1983.
In PCB 77—136,
the Board
acknowledged Petitioner’s hardship in complying with the
Rule 404 and 408 effluent standards and agreed that the
present physical-chemical plant should not be required to
meet these standards,
The regional facility will be designed
to comply with these standards,
Since the Board granted Petitioner relief from Rule
408(a),
Petitioner has discovered that it cannot comply with
the interim standard for oils,
fats and greases
(58 mg/l as
a monthly average),
the standard for lead
(0.1 mg/l),
and
the standard for nickel
(1,0 mg/l).
These discoveries are
attributed to additional data derived
from periodic discharge
monitoring reports,
The present physical-chemical plant was designed to
remove phase separable oil,
not soluble oil,
Consequently
Petitioner knows
of no effective way to reduce the present
34—87
—2—
concentrations
of soluble oil.
Petitioner
is not aware of
any
increase
in
oil discharged by its industrial contributors.
Petitioner~s
data
show
a
range
of
44 mg/l to 349 mg/l
as
monthly
averages
of oil from January,
1978
to March,
1979,
In
its
Recommendation,
the Agency attaches Petitioner’s
discharge monitoring reports for this period which show a
range
of
48
mg/l
to 187 mg/i.
For
the
period
from
January,
1979 to March,
1979 Petitioner’s
data
show
daily maximum concentrations of
lead as high as
0.74
mg/i.
Petitioner has indicated one day as high as 1,10
mg/i
but
this
was
measured
at
an overflow outfall.
Daily
maximum concentrations of
nickel have been recorded
as high
as
2.63 mg/i during
the same period.
Petitioner has been
attempting to identify
its sources of nickel and lead and
has adjusted
pH and added polymer and flocculants
to reduce
these concentrations.
To
date these efforts have not been
particularly successful,
Consequently Petitioner has
agreed
to
retain consulting services,
test additional polymers and
flocculants, and check
its laboratory procedures to remedy
these violations,
The Board concludes that denial of
a variance would
constitute arbitrary or unreasonable hardship.
Petitioner
is unable to meet the effluent
standard for
fats,
oil and
greases and
is in no position to do so,
Compliance with
this standard should not be expected until Petitioner’s
effluent
is
diverted to a regional plant which will employ
biological treatment,
The
Board agrees with the Agency’s
suggestion that 200 mg/l
as a
monthly average be used as an
interim effluent limitation
for this parameter since Petitioner’s
discharge monitoring reports
show that this level has been
approached but not exceeded,
The
Agency supports Petitioner’s
requested interim effluent
limitations for lead (0.38 mg/i
monthly average and 0.78 daily
maximum)
and nickel
(1,77
mg/i monthly average and
2.68 mg/i daily maximum),
The Board
agrees that these limitations represent Petitioner’s present
capabilities.
Petitioner’s program to cure its violations
of
these
standards
appears
reasonable
as
long
as
it
is
followed.
Consequently execution of this program will be
required
as
a
condition
of
this
variance.
This
Opinion constitutes the Board~s findings of fact
and
conclusions
of
law
in
this
matter,
ORDER
It
is
the
Order of the Pollution Control Board that
Petitioner
be granted a variance from Rule 408(a)
of Chapter
3:
Water
Pollution
as
it
pertains to oils,
fats and greases
and paragraph 2(a)
of the Board’s Order in PCB 77-136 until
June
30,
1983
and
from Rule 408(a) of Chapter
3:
Water
Pollution
as
it
pertains to lead and nickel until May
1,
1980
on
the
following conditions:
34—88
—3--
1)
During the terms of this variance Petitioner’s effluent
shall not exceed the following limitations:
Monthly average
Daily maximum
Oils,
fats
and greases
200 mg/l
Lead
(total)
0.38 mg/l
0,78 mg/l
Nickel
(total)
1.77 mg/l
2.68 mg/l
2)
Petitioner
shall continue its program outlined in
paragraphs
12 and 13 of the Petition to reduce effluent
concentrations of lead and nickel and shall
submit
quarterly progress reports to the Agency.
3)
Within 45 days of the date of this Order, Petitioner
shall execute
a Certificate of acceptance and agreement
to be bound by the terms and conditions of this variance.
This
45
day period shall
be held
in abeyance if this
matter is appealed,
The Certificate shall
be forwarded
to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
Division
of Water Pollution Control, Enforcement Programs,
2200
Churchill
Road,
Springfield,
Illinois
62706 and shall
read as follows:
CERTIFICATE
I
(We), ________________________________,
having
read and fully understanding the Order in PCB 79—88, hereby
accept that Order and agree to be bound by all of its terms
and conditions.
SIGNED
___________________________
TITLE
__________________________
DATE
____________________________
The Agency is authorized to modify NPDES Permit No.
IL
0021407
in
a
manner
consistent
with the terms
of this Order.
I,
Christan L,
Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control
Board,
hereby
certi4y
the
above Opinion and Order
were
adopted
on
the
________________
day
of
~
1979
by
a
vote
of
~
Christan L.
Mof
,
Clerk
Illinois Pollution
ontrol Board
34—89