AJ~CE~~ED
rili(’S OFFICE
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
iN
THE MATTER
OF:
SITE REMEDIATION PROGRAM
(AMENDMENTS TO 35
ILL.
ADM. CODE 740)
)
RO 1-27
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
)
)
)
)
IN THE MATTER OF:
SITE REMEDIATION PROGRAM
PROPOSED
35
ILL. ADM. CODE
740.SUBPARTH (SCHOOLS, PUBLIC
PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS)
)
)
)
)
)
)
RO1-29
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
(Consolidated)
NOTICE OF FILING
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois
60601
Bobb Beauchamp, Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois
60601
Matthew J. Dunn, Chief
Environmental Bureau
Office of the Attorney General
James R. Thompson Center
100 West Randolph, 12th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Robert Lawley, ChiefLegal
Counsel
Department ofNatural Resources
524 South Second Street
Springfield,
Illinois 62701-1787
Attached Service List
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that today I have filed with the Office of the Clerk of the Pollution Control
Board the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’sAgency’s Motion to Amend Original Agency Proposal and
Testimony of Gregory W. Dunn SupportingAgency’s ProposedRevisions to Section 740.4 15(d)(3), a copy of
each of which is herewith served upon you.
Respectfully submitted,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ByJ~J
Mark Wight
Assistant Counsel
IA!
11t7
DATE: March 13, 2001
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, IL 62794-9276
(217) 782-5544
WII\R
1
5
2.001
b
OF
ILLINOIS
pollution
Control
Board
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED
ON RECYCLED PAPER
RECEIVED
CLERK’SOFFICE
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
MAR 1
~
2001
IN TI{E MATTER OF:
)
SIAl~L
Uk-’
ILUI’4OIS
PoIIutio,i
Control Board
)
SITE REMEDIATION PROGRAM
)
ROI-27
(AMENDMENTS TO
35
ILL.
)
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
ADM. CODE
740)
)
[NTHEMATTEROF:
)
SITE REMEDIATION PROGRAM
)
ROl-29
PROPOSED 35 ILL. ADM. CODE
)
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
740.SUBPART H (SCHOOLS, PUBLIC
)
(Consolidated)
PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS)
)
AGENCY’SMOTION TO AMEND ORIGINAL AGENCY PROPOSAL
THE ILLiNOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (“Illinois EPA”), pursuant to
35
III. Adm. Code
102.401
and
101 .Subpart E, moves that the Illinois Pollution Control Board
(“Board”)
accept the additional proposed amendment in the above-captioned rulemaking.
In support of this motion, the Illinois EPA states as follows:
The Illinois EPA has, in this proceeding before the Board,proposed amendments to 35 III. Adm.
Code 740: Site Remediation Program.
The primarypurpose of the amendments
is to clarify and refine
certain provisions based on the Illinois EPA’sexperience in administering the rules since their adoption
by the Board in 1997. To accomplish this purpose, the Illinois EPA believes that further adjustments to
its original proposal are necessary and desirable.
The additional proposed
amendment is attached hereto.
At Section 740.4
15(d)(3)
the Illinois EPA proposes to revise its original proposed amendment.
Upon further consideration, the Illinois EPA believes that its original proposed amendment does not
sufficiently clarify what is expected of participants in the Site Remediation Program (“SRP”)with regard
to the practical quantitation limits of test methods.
The newly proposed amendment is necessary to improve the effectiveness of the SRP in ensuring
that human health is protected at sites receiving comprehensive No Further Remediation Letters.
The
rules are now open for amendment and may not be again for several years.
The Board has not yet
published the proposed amendments for first notice, so there is no procedural
obstacle to
accepting the
additional amendments.
For these reasons, the Illinois EPA respectfully requests that the Board accept
the additional proposed amendments and supporting testimony aspart ofthis Part 740
rulemaking.
Respectfully submitted,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
By:
Mark Wight, Assista
t
ounsel
DATED: March
13,
2001
1021
North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, IL 62794-9276
(217) 782-5544
TILTS FILING IS SUBMITTED ON RECYCLED PAPER.
ATTACHMENT ONE TO AGENCY’S MOTIONTO AMEND:
AGENCY’SREVISED PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO SECTION 740.415(d)(3)
Single underline and strike-through indicate the originalAgencyproposal ofJanuary
10,
2001.
Double underline and strike-through indicate revisions proposed
in
the Agency’sMotion
to
Amend
Section
740.415
Site Investigation-- General
A site investigation shall be performed under this Part to identify, as indicated within the RA’s
application forreview and evaluation services, all or specified recognized environmental conditions
existing at the remediation site, the related contaminants of concern, and associated factors that will
aid in the identification ofrisks to human health, safety and the environment, the determination of
remediation objectives, and the design and implementation ofa Remedial Action Plan.
a)
Ifthe RA has elected under the application for review and evaluation services
to obtain
a No Further Remediation Letter covering all recognized environmental conditions and
related contaminants ofconcern for the remediation site, then the procedures provided
under Sections 740.420 and
740.425 ofthis Part shall be followed.
b)
Ifthe RA has elected under the application forreview and evaluation services to obtain
a No Further Remediation Letter covering a limited number ofrecognized
environmental conditions and related contaminants ofconcern as specified
by the RA,
then the procedures at Sections 740.430 and 740.43
5
ofthis
Part shall be followed.
c)
The RA may revise an election at anytime by initiating a modification of the Review
and Evaluation Services Agreement under Section 740.220 of this Part and performing
the appropriate site investigation, if necessary.
d) Site investigations shall satisfy the following data quality objectives for field and
laboratory operations to ensure that all data is scientifically valid and ofknown
precision and accuracy:
1)
All field sampling activities relative to
sample collection, documentation,
preparation, labeling, storage, shipment and
security, quality assurance and
quality control, acceptance criteria, corrective action,
and decontamination
procedures shall be conducted in accordance with “TestMethods for Evaluating
Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods” (SW-846), Vol. One, Ch. One
(Quality Control) and Vol.
Two (Field Manual), incorporated by reference at
Section 740.125 ofthis Part.
Ifapproved by the Agency, such activities also
may be conducted in accordance with ASTM standards,
methods identified in
“A Compendium of Superfund Field Operations Methods” (EPAIS4O/0-87-00 1,
OSWER Directive 9355.0-14, December 1987), “SubsurfaceCharacterization
and Monitoring Techniques: A Desk Reference Guide,
Volume I:
Solids and
Ground Water, Appendices A and B” (EPAJ625/R-93/003a, May 1993),
“Subsurface Characterization and Monitoring Techniques: A Desk Reference
Guide, Volume II: The Vadose Zone, Field Screening and Analytical Methods,
Appendices
C and D” (EPA1625/R-93/003b, May 1993), or other procedures.
2) All field measurement activities relative to equipment and instrument operation,
calibration and maintenance, corrective action, and data handling shall be
conducted in accordance with “Test Methods forEvaluating Solid Waste,
Physical/Chemical Methods” (SW-846),Vol. One, Ch. One (Quality Control),
incorporated by reference at Section 740.125 ofthis Part, or with an equipment
or instrument manufacturer’sorvendor’spublished standard operating
procedures.
3) All laboratory quantitative analysis ofsamples to
determine concentrations of
regulated substances or pesticides shall be conducted fully in accordance with
“Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods” (SW-
846), incorporated by referen&e at Section 740.125
ofthis Part, relative to all
facilities, equipment and instrumentation, operating procedures, sample
management, test methods, equipment calibration and maintenance, quality
assurance and quality control, corrective action, data reduction and validation,
reporting, and records management.
The practical quantitation limit (PQL) of
the test methods selected must be less than or equal to the most nrotective Tier
1
soil remediation objectives in 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 742.Apnendix B, fef
residential properties, applicable groundwater remediation objectives under 35
Ill. Adm Code 742.Appendix B, or, if already determined, PQL for the Target
Compound List at Appendix A ofthis Part, or, if the site remediation objective
concentrations have been determined, the PQL must be less than or equal to the
remediation objective concentrations forthe site.
Ifa contaminant ofconcern is
not identified in Part
742 or the remediation objectives for the site have not
been determined, the POL shall eaual the lowest concentration that reliably can
be achieved within specified limits ofprecision and accuracy duriua routine
laboratorv operatiua conditions but shall not be greater than ten (10) times the
method detection limit
4)
All field or laboratory measurements ofsamples to determine physical or
geophysical characteristics shall be conducted in accordance with ASTM
standards or other procedures as approved by the Agency.
5)
All laboratory quantitative analyses of samplesto determine concentrations of
any regulated substances or pesticides that require more exacting detection
limits or cannot be analyzed by standard methods identified in “TestMethods
for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods” (SW-846),
incorporated by reference at Section 740.125 ofthis Part, shall be conducted in
accordance with analytical protocols developed in consultation with and
approved by the Agency.
~)
Effective July
1, 2002, all quantitative analyses ofsamples collected on or after
that date and utilizing any ofthe approved test methods identified in 35
Ill
Adm. Code 186.180 shall be completedby an accredited laboratory in
accordance with the requirements of35
Ill. Adm. Code
186.
Quantitative
analyses not utilizing an accredited laboratory in accordance with Part
186 shall
be deemed invalid
(Source: Amended at
____
Ill. Reg.
___________,
effective
___________
RECEIVt~
CLERK’S OFFICE
MAR
1
5
2001
.STATE OF ILLINOIS
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
BOA 1W
ronutlon
Control Board
iN THE MATTER OF:
)
)
SITE REMEDIATION PROGRAM
)
RO1-27
(AMENDMENTS TO 35
ILL.
)
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
ADM. CODE
740)
)
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
SITE REMEDIATION PROGRAM
)
ROl-29
PROPOSED
35 ILL. ADM. CODE
)
(Rulemaking
-
Land)
740.SUBPART H (SCHOOLS, PUBLIC
)
(Consolidated)
PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS)
)
TESTIMONY OF GREGORY W.
DUNN SUPPORTING AGENCY’SPROPOSED
REVISION TO SECTION 740.415(d)(3) AS ATTACHED TO AGENCY’SMOTION
TO AMEND
My name is Gregory W. Dunn.
I am currently manager of one ofthe Site
Remediation Program Units ofthe Bureau ofLand ofthe Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency (Agency). The Site Remediation Program (SRP), as established under
35111. Adm. Code 740, provides Remediation Applicants (property owners, developers,
bankers, real estate agents, businesses, etc.) the opportunity to receive review and
evaluation services, technical assistance, and no further remediation determinations from
theAgency.
I graduated from Eastern Illinois University in 1986 with a B.S. in Geology and a
B.S. in Earth Science. I have been employed with the Agency since September
1986.
I
was a project manager in the Site Assessment Unit from September
1986 until October
1992.
From October
1992 until July
1997, I was a project manager in the Pre-Notice
1
Program, which became the Site Remediation Program in
June 1997.
From July 1997
until December 1998, I was a project manager in the State Sites Unit, which uses State
funds to remediate sites. Since December 1998, I have been manager ofone ofthe Site
Remediation Program units.
I am registered as a Licensed Professional Geologist in the
State ofIllinois.
Today I will testify in support ofa proposed rule change in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 740
concerning the reworking oflanguage in 740.4 15(d)(3) and the deletion ofthe practical
quantitation limits in Appendix A.
The Agency proposed amendments to Section
740.415(d)(3) in its original proposal submitted to the Pollution Control Board (Board)
on January 10, 2001,
and accepted by the Board for hearing on February
5,
2001.
However, the Agency subsequently concluded that the original language proposed for
Section 740.41 5(d)(3) needed further clarification.
It requested at the hearing on
February 28, 2001, that oral testimony and questions on this Section be deferred until the
second hearing on April 4, 2001.
The Agency submitted the clarifying language to the
Board in a Motion to Amend dated March 13,
2001.
This testimony is in support ofthat
clarifying language and the corresponding changes to Appendix A.
Screening for Hazardous Substances and the Target Compound List
(Section 749.415(d)(3); Appendix A, Tables A
-
D)
The Site Remediation Program uses the United States Environmental Protection
Agency’sTarget Compound List as a representation ofthe hazardous substances most
commonly found at remediation sites.
The Target Compound List is found in Appendix
2
A of Part 740.
Under certain circumstances, the Target Compound List provides a basis
for initial screening for the presence ofhazardous
substances.
Itis not intended to
determine if the site has met remediation objective concentrations established in Part 742.
Rather, if the presence ofhazardous substances is revealed based on the screening
concentrations, the substances become contaminants of concern and must be remediated
to Tier
1, Tier 2 or Tier 3 remediation levels. The Target Compound List is not used for
focused site investigations but may be used as a supplement for sites undergoing
comprehensive site investigations.
Section 740.415(d)(3) provides that all laboratory quantitative analyses shall be
conducted using SW-846 Methods as incorporated by reference at Section 740.125.
The
current language in Section 740.41 5(d)(3) states that the Practical Quantitation Limit
(PQL) “of the test methods selected must be less than or equal to the PQL for the Target
Compound
List at Appendix A ofthis Part, or, if the site remediation objective
concentrations have been determined, the PQL must be
less than or equal to the
remediation objective concentrations for the
site.”
Based on this provision, one could sample forthe Target Compound List
parameters and meet the required quantitation limits (RQL) as identified in Appendix A,
but potentially have a site that
is not protective of humanhealth or the environment. This
may occur if the compound is identified during the screening process at a concentration
below the RQL value but above the Tier
1
or site-specific remediation objective. The
screening procedure allows the RA to treat the
compound as if it is not present at the site.
3
However, the RQLs for at least thirty-eight compounds identified in Appendix A are
above the ingestion,
soil migration to groundwater, or groundwaterremediation
objectives as established in Tier
1 of35 Ill. Adm. Code 742 or in 35 Ill.
Adm. Code 620.
See Attachment
1.
Twenty-eight ofthese thirty-eight compounds are identified as
potential carcinogens in the Tier
1
tables.
Ifthese hazardous substances are eliminated as
contaminants ofconcern based on the higher screening levels ofthe RQLs, an
unrestricted, comprehensive NFR Letter could be obtained with these compounds
remaining at the site at concentrations above those that would be allowed under Part 742.
The language proposed by the Agency in its original proposal ofJanuary 10,2001
stated:
“Thepractical quantitation limit (PQL) ofthe test methods selected must be less
than or equal to the Tier I soil remediation objectives for residential properties,
applicable groundwater remediation objectives in 35
Ill.
Adm. Code 742.Appendix B, or,
if already determined, the remediation objective concentrations for the site.”
However,
this language leaves two problems because it does not addiess the nine compounds that
have construction worker inhalation objectives lower than the residential objectives (see
Attachment 2) or the forty-one compounds that are not identified in 35 Ill. Adm.
Code
Part 742.
(See Attachment 3.)
As an example ofthe first problem, toluene has a construction worker inhalation
objective of42 mg/kg. Ifthe screening level were the residential Tier
1
soil objective as
in the Agency’soriginal proposed amendment, toluene might not be identified as a
contaminant ofconcern because the residential inhalation objective is 650 mg/kg. This
4
would allow toluene to remain at the site at levels posing a threat in the construction
worker scenario even though the site had been issued an unrestricted, comprehensive No
Further Remediation Letter. In the case of the forty-one compounds not identified in
Part
742 tables, theproblem created by the Agency’soriginal proposal is that there is no
alternative to Appendix A for establishing the practical
quantitation limit short of
calculating site-specific remediation objectives, a step that may be premature at the site
investigation stage.
Therefore, the Agency proposes newlanguage to address the original problem of
PQLs that are too high for screening values as well as the problems left unaddressedby
the Agency’sfirst proposed amendments to Section 740.415(d)(3).
The new language is:
“The practical
quantitation limit (PQL) ofthe test methods selected must be less than or
equal to the most protective Tier
1
soil remediation objectives in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
742.Appendix B, applicable groundwater remediation objectives in 35 Ill. Adm. Code
742 .Appendix B, or, if already determined, the remediation objective concentrations for
the site.
Ifa contaminant ofconcern is not identified in Part 742 orthe remediation
objectives for the site have not been determined, the PQLshall equal the lowest
concentration that reliably can be achieved within specified limits of precision and
accuracy during routine laboratory operating conditions, but shall not be greater than ten
(10) times the method detection limit.”
This revision will make the screening values for
hazardous substances on the Target Compound List protective ofall uses by ensuring that
hazardous substances in concentrations above the most protective Part 742 objectives are,
5
identified as contaminants ofconcern and that no hazardous substances remain on site
above the Tier 1, Tier 2 or Tier 3 levels appropriate for the site.
-
As noted above, the proposed amendment at Section 740.4l5(d)(3) also requires
the amendment ofAppendix A, Tables A through D.
The Agency proposes to delete the
water and soil RQLs and the statement concerning RQLs located below each table in
Appendix A. The screening values then would be as provided in amended Section
740.41
5(d)(3)
as discussedpreviously. Appendix A tables would contain only the CAS
number, the compound name and the method used to analyze a particular compound.
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED
ON
RECYCLED PAPER.
6
5
E
C
0
0)
0)
—
—
.~e
~
0)0)00)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)
C~
000000000000000000
00000000
—
r-
~
r
————
—
T~
—
.
.—
,-
r-
nu
—
—
,—
a)
0.
i~
0
U
U)
U)
U) U)
a
Cu
Cu
C,
a)
a)
V
0
V
=
=
a)
L.
0.
..~J
...a
__
r~.
~
I—
I-.
z
_
C9C~
1.1.1
4-
U)
c~u
~
0
~~-~CuCuCuCuCuCuCUCO
Cu
Cu
CU
CU
CU
Cu
CU
COW
WCUCUCU
CU
z
.2
n~
ooooooooooowoo~3~3~3cnoooooooo
a)
I—
~
a)
C2)
I
0) 0)
.0
.>I
~——
o
~n]
c0000CJ000CV0J000000000000001.t)Lt)
0
~66o—c~c~i
U)
V
a)a)a)
C
C
U)U)
U)a)~
CuCuCu
o
CC
C
0.0.0.
U)
U)CuCu
CuCuW
U)
000
U)ao.o.
E
Va)
0a)a)Cu~’-~-
.C
000
0
.C-~
0.0.0.0.
o
.2.=
~BEE0000a)a)
000
CuVOo
U~~0.0O0a)~
•ooo
.o
~C
L.EE
0~.C..C.
L.0ONN
_
999~E22a)a)
a)CV)C~)C~)
cO——cc
~
E~00
Am>
0
oO~.~Z
D~NLh~chEE~Cuoo
E
~
C.)
-CC00XL-L..
o
2.~
0)0)
0)0) 0)0)
0)0)
~
DOOOOOO(DCDU)LOCDOOOOOOOOO
CO CO
‘-
~-
N
N
CD CD
~-
~-
,-
‘~-
‘~-
~-
N
N
CD
~-
~-
‘-
~- ~- ~- ~-
i-
WU)
U)Cu
COCO
00
I
~
N~
N...
U)a)
4-•
—
COCO
VV
==
I-
L.
22
~
(9(9
22
~V
V
C
V
C
C
C
C
2~
~2 ~2
0)0)
—.
—
U,C
0000
0)0)
~- ~-
COCO
NNOO
a)U)a)U)
CCCC
a)U)a)a)
0000
V
I
~
CI
1
L.
N...
~
Oj
CCCC
E]
Qc?~i~
0
(0(0(0(0
01
NN NN
U)U,
CuU)
COW
00
I
I
N-
a)a)
COCO
VV
CC
00
I-
(-9(9
00
CC
00
.
1-i
.4-
COW
N...
I...
CO CO
N-
.4-’
V~V~
C~C~
~0~0
0~0~
i~5CD~~50
Cu
Cu.Cu
Cu
U)
U)U)
Nfl
CO
CO
COW
0000
U)Cu
U)
U)U)
U)
COW
Cu
00
0
I
I
N... N...
a)U)
COW
VV
CC
I-
22
~
=
0
0
L(C
~5
.5~
.~
•5
CO
(0 00
CO
N-
a)
Cu
V
C
=
2
~
N-
CD~W~CO~Cu~Cu
4-’V~V~VV~V~
CCCCCC
~
~U)U)
U)U)
U)
CuU)
U) U)
CuU)U)CuU)U)CuCuCu
COCuCOCOCUWCOCOCO
000000000
0)0)
0)
0)
0)0)==
==00e’JNCO
~COI’-LO
~-~--NNO000CD00~--r--COOOOO
—a)U)U)
~5
0
C
C
C
CCa)a)U)
00000
.4-’
4--.
4
.4-
CCCCC
DODOD
I
I I
I
I
NNNNN
a)a)
CC
~
U)
C
C
C C
C
C
=
a)
~
.~
~‘
a)
U)
•Sflfl
~
0
0
2
~ ~.2
000
.C.C.C
C.) C.)
C)
CO
COW
I
)<
X
C
C
C
C
~
U)
Q)
a)
a) a)
U)
NIIO..D..0..D..
a)
Cu
COU)a)U)
~)
U)U)
~CCCC
CC
~a)a)a)U)
0
0
-~
~‘
‘4-
COW
~CCC
C
N-N...
CUCOCOCO
X
N...
N- N- I...
4-—.
U)OOoO
CC
O
CO
Cu
C
~P
0
0
0
0
.0
~
N N N
N
C
C
C
C
CO
U) U)
.C .C
Cu
U) U)
U) U)
0mm00.Smmmm
-J
a
E
C
0
Cu
<2
XW
V
C
V
a)
0.
0
,~J.
U)
U)
-J
a
:5
a)
0.
0.
0
3%.
a)
0
.5
m
U)
a)
U
a)
.0
0
4j
0
C.)
I-
z
w
I
C.)
I-
I-
U)
V
0
0.
E
0
C.)
-J
a
E
C
0)
Cu
~
0)~
~
<C
oo~~
X
CO
(00000(000
00 00
‘0
CO
~
‘0
0.
0
,~.
U)
U)
U)
U)
a
CO
N-
U)
x
4-
CO
V
•0
C
I.
~
o
~
C~CO~Cu~Cu(9
C.)
<
V~~V~0
o
~
~—
‘~.
~2 ~
Z
a)
~
N-c,
CO
N-N-N-
0
_
(-9
Iii
U)
IJCnU)U)U)IZU)U)~U)CflU)U)U)
~ ~CUWWWW’
5WCuWCOCO
0
O~
E0000.~00CO00000
I—
~
I.—
a)
U
=1
~
~
0)
0).~
~
~
0)~
~
0)
o
‘~i
~~9~g’
~‘
.~?J
c~CD
I
~6~ooN~N~t
U)
V
C
a)
U)
a)
U)(I)
CCCCC
0
U)U)U)U)U)
0.
>N>COCOCu
E
00.N-N-~
o
O
CCCOUCOCOCO
U) U) U)
I
I
N- N-
V~
~0.C’U’~.CuCucO0
E
=
Cu Cu
C,
~
~EE
oj
~
00.2
NNNCC
~EE~—
Cu
0
I
U)U)U)VV~~~0.CCU).CCu
0
cflm~DDQ~<<rr1I->
U)
0
ci
~0
—o
(‘I
‘—C
ci)
.~
U)
a)
cUa)
.5.3
a)—
I-cu
0.5
0.5
I—
I-a)
z
uJ
I
I-
I.—
~a)
0.0
00
L..
U)
N-.
C
0
.4-
C,
N-.
U,
C
0
0
ci)
0
.2’
.0
0
C
0
CU
-c
C
•0
E
0
N...
ci~
(U
Ii
0)
E ~‘E
~‘~E~)
~Dgo.DDDoo
OLOCr,DLOCO
~CD~-~-L0
0)
0)0)
-~)-~
~
EE~’~)E
E
O)OgLO~~JC~~
OL()VC~)
U)
tDC
CU)
ci~ CU
0-
•0 .C
0
~00
o
o
0—
U)
0
.000
U)
I...
I
I
CU”~C\V5
U)
C
U)
N
U)
cci,
(1)
.0
0
Na)
N...
CN
0
U)C
~
U)
_
_
0
>
0wc/,~-
ATTACHMENT 3
Compounds in Part 740.Appendix A With No Objective in Part 742
Chioromethane
2-Butanone
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
1,1 ,2,2..Tetrachloroethene
2,2’Oxybis(1-chioropropane)
2-Nitrophenol
Hexachiorobutadiene
2-Methylnaphthalene
2-Nitroaniline
Acenaphthalene
4-Nitrophenol
4..Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
4,6..Dinitro-2-methylphenol
Phenanthrene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
delta-BHC
EndosulfanII
Endrin Ketone
Aluminum
Magnesium
Sodium
Chioroethane
Dibromochioromethane
2-Hexanone
1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene
4..Methylphenol
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)methane
4-Chioro-3-methyiphenol
2-Chloronaphthalene
Dimethylphthalate
3-Nitroaniline
Dibenzofuran
4-Nitroaniline
4-Bromophenyl-phenyl ether
Di-n-butylphthalate
beta-BHC
Endosulfan I
Endosulfan Sulfate
Endrin Aldehyde
Calcium
Potassium
STATE OF
ILLINOIS
COUNTY OF SANGAMON
)
)
)
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned,
on oath state that I have served the attached Agency’sMotion to Amend
Original Agency Proposal and Testimony ofGregory W. Dunn Supporting Agency’sProposed Revisions
to Section 740.41 5(d)(3) upon the persons to whom they are directed by placing copies in envelopes
addressed to:
DorothyGunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, Suite
11-500
Chicago,Illinois
60601
(FEDERAL EXPRESS
-
OVERNIGHT)
Bobb Beauchamp, Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James
R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(FEDERAL EXPRESS
-
OVERNIGHT)
Matthew J. Dunn, Chief
Environmental
Bureau
Office ofthe Attorney General
James R. Thompson Center
100 West Randolph,
12th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(FIRST CLASS MALL)
Robert Lawley, Chief Legal Counsel
DepartmentofNatural Resources
524 South Second Street
Springfield,
Illinois 62701-1787
(FIRST CLASS MAIL)
Attached Service List
(FIRST CLASS MAIL)
and mailing them from
Springfield, Illinois on
iziAz~L..
with
sufficient postage affixed as
indicated above.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME
thisj3~jdayof
~
fI1~
—
2001.
eb~f
Notary Public
t
OFFICIAL SEAL
BRENDA
BOEHNER
~
NOTARY PUBLIC.
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS
~:MYCOMMISSION
EXPIRES
11-14-2001
THIS FILING IS SUBMITTED
ON RECYCLED PAPER
Service List
ROI-27
February 21,2001
Karen
I... Bernoteit
tEllS
215
Fos-f
Adams Street
Springfield,
IL. 62701
Erin Curley
Midwest &I9ineerifl9 Services.
Inc.
4243 W. 166th Street
Oak Forest.
XL. 60452
William G. bickett
Sidley & Austin
10 South Dearborn
Suite 5200
Chicago, IL 60603
Matthew 5. Dunn
Environnieritol Bureau
Office of the Attorney General
200
W. Randolph
12th Floor
Chicago, IL 60601
Steven
Gobelman
ThOT
Bd &
&
2300 South birksen Parkway
Mootn 330
Springfield, IL 62764
Dorothy Aft. Gunn
Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control
Board
tOO
W.
Randolph
Suite 11-500
Chicago, XL 60601
Katherine
1). I-lodge
I-lodge & bwyer
P.O. Box 5776
Springfield, IL 62705-5776
Robert Lawley
Department of Natural Resources
524 South Second Street
Springfield, IL 62701-1787
Monte Nienkerk
Clayton Group Services
3140 Finley Road
Downers
Grove, IL 60515
Daniel
Goodwin,
P.E.
Goodwin Environmental Consultants
400 Brims Lane
Springfield, IL 62702
Hollyb.
Harley, Esq
Chicago Legal Clinic
205
W.
Monroe Street
4th Floor
Chicago, IL 60606
Stephen
Kirschner
Advanced
SeaServices Corp.
Rt.
202 &
1
Brandywine One
Suite 202
Chadds Ford,
PA 19317
Brent
Manning
Director
Deparflnent of Natural Resources
524
S. Second Street
4th Floor
Springfield, XL 62701
Ste~fan
A. Not
Citizens
a Better Environment
205
W.
Monroe Street
4th
Floor
Chicago,IL 60606
Mike ~apps
Rapps Engine~ririg & ~ppIi~d
Science
821 5. Durkin t~rive
$pringfield.tL 6~7O4
J~irn
I~yw~
Office of
the
Attorncy ~en~raI
100
W. ~ando~ph
Chicc~go, Th 60601
MrkWight
&PA
~21
North Grand Aveiiue East
0. Box 19276
~ringfitId,
IL 62794-9a78
3ohn ~eimon~i
tNDEC~
600
N,
BuffdIo Grove Rd.
Suite 300
Suffalo
erove,
IL
60089
Thomas V. Skinner
f~ire~tor
IEPA
1O?I NorTh
Grc~nd
Avenue E~t
P~O.
Box
19276
~prn,gfi~Id,IL 62794-9278
~c,bb
A.
Beaud~ci’np
Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control 8oord
100
W.
~aiidoIph
Suite 11-500
Chi~go, IL 60601
