ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    October
    6,
    1983
    CITY OF FARMINGTON,
    )
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 83—63
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by J. Anderson):
    This matter comes before the Board on the petition for
    variance of the City of Farrnington
    (City),
    filed May 5,
    1983 as
    amended May 24 and July 18,
    1983.
    The City seeks variance from
    the prohibition against sanitary sewer overflows of 35 Ill.
    Adm.
    Code 306.103(b),
    in order to construct temporary bypasses in
    its sewer system
    to facilitate measurement of wet weather flows.
    On August 12,
    1983 the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    (Agency)
    filed its Recommendation that variance be granted until
    July 1,
    1984,
    subject to conditions.
    Hearing was waived and
    none has been held.
    The City of Farmington,
    Fulton County, has
    a population of
    about 3000 and operates
    a sanitary sewer system serving about
    1,100 users.
    The sewer system is tributary to the Farmington
    Sanitary District’s sewage treatment plant
    (STP).
    The sewer system suffers from severe overloading during wet
    weather, apparently due to excess infiltration and/or inflow.
    If
    the groundwater table
    is high, as in the spring,
    a
    1
    3/4 inch
    rainfall in 12 hours will result in back—ups in about 100 base-
    ments, and sewer overflows at about
    10 manholes.
    Rainfalls of
    this intensity occur on an average of once a year.
    The City and Farmington Sanitary District has recently (late
    1970s)
    completed STP construction and sewer system rehabilitation
    and construction under a State grant.
    STP construction consisted
    of a two cell
    lagoon system followed by intermittent sand filters
    and chlorination and terminal
    lift station and forcemain
    (a per—
    mitted bypass exists upstream of the lift station).
    Sewer system
    54-159

    2
    rehabilitation and construction consisted of plugging three sewer
    cleanouts, disconnecting three storm sewer
    inlets, constructing
    400 feet of 8—inch sewer to replace
    a 4—inch sewer, replacing
    seventy-two open-type manhole lids with watertight manhole frames,
    and grouting the interior of seventeen brick manholes.
    In addi-
    tion, approximately 1,671
    feet of 8—inch replacement sewers were
    installed that were not grant eligible.
    Even with this sewer
    system rehabilitation and construction, excessive flows still
    exist.
    On February
    9,
    1982, the Agency awarded Petitioner a Step
    1
    State grant
    in the amount of $52,500 for,
    in part,
    the preparation
    of
    an SSES
    (no SSES was prepared under the previous grant
    discussed above).
    The purpose of this grant is to address the
    problems
    of basement backups
    and
    manhole overflows.
    (This project
    presently does not have priority to receive Step
    2 and
    3 funds
    and future funding is “questionable”, according to the Agency).
    As part of the SSES, the City plans
    to conduct a flow
    monitoring study.
    However,
    it feels that accurate flow data
    cannot be obtained as long as unmeasurable amounts back up into
    basements and overflow manholes.
    In order to obtain a means to
    measure this flow,
    the City proposes to install three bypasses to
    eliminate basement backups and manhole overflows.
    Bypass
    1 will discharge to a tributary of Kickapoo Creek,
    a
    tributary to the Illinois River, while Bypass
    2 and Bypass
    3 will
    discharge
    to a tributary of Littlers Creek,
    a tributary to the
    Spoon River, and thence to the Illinois River.
    Both Kickapoo and
    Littlers Creek,
    in the vicinity of Farmington,
    are considered to
    have
    a 7—day,
    10—year low flow of zero.
    These creeks could be
    adversely affected by the discharges
    of deoxygenating wastes and
    sewage related solids.
    However, these effects will he somewhat
    minimized by the fact that discharging will only occur during wet
    weather.
    The City asserts that there is no practical alternative to
    the bypass method proposed if
    it
    is to gather the accurate data
    needed for its SSES.
    The use of pumps
    or other mechanical methods
    at manhole discharge points
    is believed not feasible due to their
    cost and inaccuracy,
    and would not address the problem of
    measuring basement backups.
    The Agency notes that the bypasses the City proposes are
    actually not new.
    Petitioner presently has an unpermitted 24-
    inch high level overflow pipe at Bypass
    1.
    (However, the Agency
    believes some adjustment to the elevation of the pipe might be
    necessary
    in order to provide relief from basement backups and
    manhole overflows.)
    Furthermore, during wet weather, the City
    pumps from various manholes to relieve basement backups, which
    the Agency thinks probably involves Bypass
    2 and Bypass
    3.
    54-160

    Notwithstanding these infractions of the bypassing
    prohibition, the Agency recommends that variance be granted until
    July
    1,
    1984,
    the flow monitoring completion date contained in
    the petition.
    The Agency suggests that denial
    of variance could
    affect the SSES and eventual sewer system rehabilitation which
    could have
    long term effects through the continuation of basement
    backups and manhole overflows if not properly planned at the
    beginning.
    On the other hand grant of variance should have only
    a
    short term impact on the receiving stream and should actually
    solve the basement backup problem during the period of the flow
    monitoring study.
    Conditions suggested include a study to determine the proper
    elevation of bypasses, and a requirement
    that bypasses he pluqged
    once the study is completed.
    The Board
    finds that denial
    of variance would
    impose an
    arbitrary or unreasonable hardship,
    as the variance relief
    suggested does appear
    to be the only mechanism for collection of
    data necessary to solve a severe environmental problem.
    Variance
    I~rom35
    Ill. Mm.
    Code 306.103(b) will be granted until July 1,
    1984, with conditions similar to those recommended by
    the
    Agency.*
    The Board notes, however,
    that there has been considerable
    slippage
    in the timetable suggested by the City in May.
    Should
    the variance term need extension for data collection purposes,
    the City is invited to bring this matter
    to
    the Board’s attention
    during the 35 day period for reconsideration of this Opinion and
    Order.
    *The Board agrees with
    the
    Agency’s comment that,
    should the
    City wish
    at a later time to extend the variance beyond the data
    collection period to allow
    for continued relief from the basement
    back-up and manhole overflow problems, a compliance plan
    discussing private, non—grant funding for sewer improvements would
    he
    necessary if grant funding remains “questionable”.
    0RDEP~
    1.
    Petitioner, the City of Farmington is hereby granted
    variance from 35
    Ill. Mm. Code 306.103(b),
    subject to the
    following conditions:
    a)
    This variance authorizes only installation and
    use of the
    3 bypasses described
    in Exhibit
    A to the May
    5,
    1983 variance petition.
    54-161

    4
    b)
    This variance shall expire on July
    1,
    1984 or upon
    completion of the flow monitoring
    study, whichever occurs
    first.
    The three bypasses will then either he removed or
    permanently sealed,
    if no further variance has been applied
    for by the City and granted by the Board.
    C)
    Petitioner shall determine the elevation of
    sewage at each of the three bypasses when basement backups
    of manhole overflow occur and shall develop plans to install
    the bypass no more than
    6 inches below this elevation.
    The
    plan and any necessary
    permit
    applications shall
    be submitted
    to the Agency for its approval.
    d)
    Petitioner shall monitor and
    report
    to the Agency
    monthly the date(s) of each bypass event, quantity of waste-
    water bypassed, and weather conditions that caused the bypass.
    2.
    Within thirty
    (30)
    days of the date of this Order,
    Petitioner shall execute and forward to Steven
    M.
    Spiegel,
    Attorney Advisor, Enforcement Programs, the Illinois Environmental
    Protection Agency,
    2200 Churchill Road,
    Springfield, Illinois
    62706,
    a Certificate of Acceptance and Agreement to be hound to
    all terms and conditions of this variance.
    This thirty
    (30) day
    period shall
    be held in abeyance for any period this matter
    is
    being appealed.
    The form of the certificate
    shall he as follows~
    CERTIFICATE
    I,
    (We),
    ___
    ,
    having read
    the
    Order of the Illinois Pollution Control Board in PCB 83—63
    dated
    ____________—~____
    ,
    understand and accept the
    said Order,
    realizing that such acceptance renders all terms and
    conditions thereto binding and enforceable.
    Petitioner
    By:
    Authorized Agent
    Title
    Date
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    Board Chairman J.D. Dumelie
    concurred.
    54-162

    5
    I, Christan
    L. Moffett, Clerk
    of
    the
    Illinois Pollution
    Control Board,
    hereby Lcertify
    that
    the above Opinion and Order
    was adopted pn the
    (~
    day o~
    ~
    1983 by
    a vote of
    ~/-Q
    ‘I
    ____________-
    /
    _____
    Christan
    L. Mo~t~t,Clerk
    Illinois Poilutioii Control Board
    c4~~1
    ~:~q

    Back to top