ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
February
19, 1976
WINNETKANS INTERESTED IN PROTECTING
)
THE ENVIRONMENT
(WIPE),
)
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 75—363
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA,
Respondent.
INTERIM ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Young):
On January 21,
1976, Winnetka filed its Motion to Dismiss,
based on the recent decision of the Illinois Supreme Court in
Commonwealth Edison Company v. Pollution Control Board, Docket
No.
47352, decided January 20,
1976,
in which the Court affirmed
the judgment of the Appellate Court, First District, reversing
the adoption of Rule 203(g) (1)
of the Air Rules.
The Complaint, filed September
16, 1975, by Winnetkans
Interested in Protecting the Environment
(WIPE), alleged that
Winnetka operated Boiler No.
8 from May 31, 1975 until July
1,
1975 in violation of Rule 203(g) (1) (a), and has operated said
boiler without an operating permit from May 30,
1975,
in con-
tinuing violation of Rule 103(b) (2) and Section
9(b) of the Act.
That portion of the Complaint alleging violation of Rule
203(g) (1) (a)
is dismissed as moot.
However,
that portion of the
Complaint dealing with the operating permit violation has not
been mooted by the decision of the Court.
Winnetka is required
to have an operating permit under Rule 103(b) (2), and the afore-
said decision does not affect this obligation.
Furthermore,
the exact reason(s)
the operating permit has not been issued,
if in fact it has not,
has yet to be determined.
Even if it
were established that the permit was not issued solely on the
basis that Winrietka had failed
to comply with Rule 203 (g) (1) (a),
such fact would not constitute a defense but would be considered
solely in mitigation.
The portion of the Complaint relating to
violation of Section
9(b) of the Act and Rule 103(b) (2) shall
be set for hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20—107
—2—
I, Christan
L. Moffett,
Clerk
of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board, here~ycertify the
ye Interim Order was
adopted on the
jg~’
day of ______________________,
1976
by a vote of
$.~
Illinois Polluti
ontrol Board
20— 108