TITLE
35:
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
SUBTITLE
B:
AIR
POLLUTION
CHAPTER
I:
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
SUBCI{APTER
C:
EMISSIONS
STANDARDS
AND
LIMITATIONS
FOR
STATIONARY
SOURCES
oc
‘3
2009
ORGANIC
MATERIALPART
EMISSION
218
STANDARDS
AND
T4TE
IJt1OflC()iS
OF
IL’’
LIMITATIONS
FOR
THE
CHICAGO
AREA
rj
SUBPART
A:
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
Section
218.100
Introduction
218.101
Savings
Clause
218.102
Abbreviations
and
Conversion
Factors
218.103
Applicability
218.104
Definitions
218.105
Test
Methods
and
Procedures
218.106
Compliance
Dates
218.107
Operation
of
Afterburners
218.108
Exemptions,
Variations,
and
Alternative
Means
of
Control
or
Compliance
Determinations
218.109
Vapor
Pressure
of
Volatile
Organic
Liquids
218.110
Vapor
Pressure
of
Organic
Material
or
Solvent
218.111
Vapor
Pressure
of
Volatile
Organic
Material
218.112
Incorporations
by
Reference
218.113
Monitoring
for
Negligibly-Reactive
Compounds
218.114
Compliance
with
Permit
Conditions
SUBPART
B:
ORGANIC
EMISSIONS
FROM
STORAGE
AND
LOADING
OPERATIONS
Section
218.119
Applicability
for
VOL
218.120
Control
Requirements
for
Storage
Containers
of
VOL
218.121
Storage
Containers
of
VPL
218.122
Loading
Operations
218.123
Petroleum
Liquid
Storage
Tanks
218.124
External
Floating
Roofs
218.
125
Compliance
Dates
218.126
Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
218.127
Testing
VOL
Operations
218.128
Monitoring
VOL
Operations
218.129
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
for
VOL
Operations
SUBPART
C:
ORGANIC
EMISSIONS
FROM
MISCELLANEOUS
EQUIPMENT
Section
218.141
Separation
Operations
218.142
Pumps
and Compressors
218.143
Vapor Blowdown
2 18.144
Safety Relief Valves
SUBPART E:
SOLVENT
CLEANING
Section
218.18
1
Solvent Cleaning’in General
218.182
Cold
Cleaning
218.183
Open Top Vapor Degreasing
2
18.184
Conveyorized Degreasing
218.185
Compliance Schedule (Repealed)
218.186
Test Methods
SUBPART
F:
COATING
OPERATIONS
Section
2 18.204
Emission Limitations
218.205
Daily-Weighted Average
Limitations
218.206
Solids Basis Calculation
218.207
Alternative Emission Limitations
2 18.208
Exemptions from Emission Limitations
218.209
Exemption from General
Rule on
Use of Organic
Material
218.210
Compliance
Schedule
218.211
Recordkeeping and Reporting
218.212
Cross-Line Averaging to Establish
Compliance for
Coating Lines
218.213
Recordkeeping
and Reporting for
Cross-Line
Averaging Participating
Coating Lines
218.214
Changing Compliance Methods
218.215
Wood Furniture Coating Averaging
Approach
218.216
Wood Furniture Coating
Add-On
Control Use
2 18.217
Wood Furniture Coating Work
Practice
Standards
218.218
Work Practice Standards
for Paper
Coatings, Metal
Furniture
Coatings, and Large Appliance
Coatings
SUBPART G: USE OF
ORGANIC
MATERIAL
Section
218.301
Use of Organic Material
218.302
Alternative
Standard
2
18.303
Fuel Combustion Emission Units
218.304
Operations
with Compliance
Program
SUBPART
H: PRINTING AND
PUBLISHING
Section
218.401
Flexographic and Rotogravure
Printing
218.402
Applicability
218.403
Compliance Schedule
218.404
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
218.405
Lithographic
Printing:
Applicability
218.406
Provisions
Applying
to
Heatset
Web
Offset
Lithographic
Printing
Prior
to
March
15,
1996
2
18.407
Emission Limitations
and
Control
Requirements
for
Lithographic
Printing
Lines
On
and
After
March
15,
1996
218.408
Compliance Schedule
for
Lithographic
Printing
On and
After
March
15,
1996
218.409
Testing
for
Lithographic
Printing
On
and
After
March
15,
1996
218.410
Monitoring
Requirements
for
Lithographic
Printing
218.411
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
for
Lithographic
Printing
STJBPART
Q:
SYNTHETIC
ORGANIC
CHEMICAL
AND
POLYMER
MANUFACTURING
PLANT
Section
218.421
General
Requirements
218.422
Inspection
Program
Plan for
Leaks
2 18.423
Inspection Program
for
Leaks
218.424
Repairing Leaks
218.425
Recordkeeping
for
Leaks
2 18.426
Report
for Leaks
218.427
Alternative
Program
for
Leaks
218.428
Open-Ended
Valves
218.429
Standards
for
Control
Devices
2
18.430
Compliance Date
(Repealed)
218.431
Applicability
2 18.432
Control
Requirements
218.433
Performance
and
Testing
Requirements
2 18.434
Monitoring
Requirements
218.435
Recordkeeping
and Reporting
Requirements
218.436
Compliance
Date
SUBPART R:
PETROLEUM
REFINING
A1’1D
RELATED
ThDUSTRIES;
ASPHALT
MATERIALS
Section
218.441
Petroleum
Refinery
Waste
Gas
Disposal
2
18.442
Vacuum
Producing
Systems
218.443
Wastewater
(OillWater)
Separator
218.444
Process
Unit
Tumarounds
218.445
Leaks:
General
Requirements
218.446
Monitoring Program
Plan
for
Leaks
218.447
Monitoring
Program
for
Leaks
218.448
Recordkeeping
for
Leaks
218.449
Reporting for
Leaks
218.450
Alternative
Program
for
Leaks
218.451
Sealing
Device
Requirements
218.452
Compliance
Schedule
for Leaks
218.453
Compliance
Dates
(Repealed)
SUBPART
S:
RUBBER
AND
MISCELLANEOUS
PLASTIC
PRODUCTS
Section
218.461
Manufacture
of
Pneumatic
Rubber
Tires
218.462
Green Tire
Spraying
Operations
218.463
Alternative
Emission
Reduction
Systems
218.464
Emission
Testing
218.465
Compliance
Dates (Repealed)
218.466
Compliance
Plan (Repealed)
SUBPART
T:
PHARMACEUTICAL
MANTJFACTURING
Section
218.480
Applicability
218.481
Control of
Reactors,
Distillation
Units,
Crystallizers,
Centrifuges
and
Vacuum
Dryers
218.482
Control
of
Air Dryers,
Production
Equipment
Exhaust
Systems
and Filters
218.483
Material
Storage
and Transfer
218.484
Tn-Process
Tanks
218.485
Leaks
218.486
Other
Emission Units
218.487
Testing
218.488
Monitoring
for Air
Pollution
Control Equipment
218.489
Recordkeeping
for Air
Pollution
Control
Equipment
SUBPART
V: BATCH
OPERATIONS
AND AIR
OXII)ATION
PROCES
SES
Section
218.500
Applicability
for
Batch Operations
218.501
Control
Requirements
for
Batch
Operations
218.502
Determination
of
Uncontrolled
Total
Annual
Mass
Emissions
and
Average
Flow
Rate
Values
for Batch Operations
218.503
Performance
and
Testing
Requirements
for Batch
Operations
218.504
Monitoring
Requirements
for
Batch Operations
218.505
Reporting
and Recordkeeping
for Batch
Operations
218.506
Compliance
Date
218.520
Emission
Limitations
for
Air
Oxidation
Processes
218.521
Definitions
(Repealed)
218.522
Savings
Clause
218.523
Compliance
218.524
Determination
of
Applicability
2
18.525
Emission
Limitations
for
Air
Oxidation
Processes
2 18.526
Testing
and
Monitoring
2
18.527
Compliance
Date
(Repealed)
SUBPART
W: AGRICULTURE
Section
2
18.541
Pesticide
Exception
SUBPART
X:
CONSTRUCTION
Section
218.561
Architectural
Coatings
2 18.562
Paving
Operations
218.563
Cutback
Asphalt
SUBPART
Y: GASOLINE
DISTRIBUTION
Section
2 18.581
Bulk
Gasoline
Plants
2 18.582
Bulk
Gasoline
Terminals
2
18.583
Gasoline
Dispensing
Operations
Storage
Tank
Filling
Operations
218.584
Gasoline
Delivery
Vessels
218.585
Gasoline
Volatility
Standards
2
18.586
Gasoline
Dispensing
Operations
- Motor
Vehicle
Fueling
Operations
SUBPART
Z:
DRY
CLEANERS
Section
218.601
Perchioroethylene
Dry
Cleaners
(Repealed)
218.602
Applicability
(Repealed)
2 18.603
Leaks
(Repealed)
218.604
Compliance Dates
(Repealed)
218.605
Compliance Plan (Repealed)
2
18.606
Exception
to Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
2 18.607
Standards
for
Petroleum
Solvent
Dry
Cleaners
2
18.608
Operating
Practices
for
Petroleum
Solvent
Dry
Cleaners
2 18.609
Program
for
Inspection
and Repair
of Leaks
218.610
Testing
and
Monitoring
218.611
Applicability
for
Petroleum
Solvent
Dry
Cleaners
218.612
Compliance
Dates
(Repealed)
218.613
Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
SUBPART
AA:
PAINT
AND
INK
MANUFACTURING
Section
218.620
Applicability
2 18.621
Exemption
for
Waterbase
Material
and
Heatset
Offset
hilc
218.623
Permit
Conditions
(Repealed)
2
18.624
Open
Top
Mills,
Tanks,
Vats
or Vessels
2 18.625
Grinding
Mills
218.626
Storage
Tanks
218.628
Leaks
218.630
CleanUp
218.636
Compliance
Schedule
21
8.637
Recordkeeping and
Reporting
SUBPART
BB:
POLYSTYRENE
PLANTS
Section
218.640
Applicability
218.642
Emissions
Limitation
at
Polystyrene
Plants
218.644
Emissions
Testing
SUBPART
CC:
POLYESTER
RESIN
PRODUCT
MANIJFACTURJNG
PROCESS
Section
218.660
Applicability
2
18.666
Control
Requirements
218.667
Compliance
Schedule
218.668
Testing
218.670
Recordkeeping and
Reporting
for Exempt
Emission
Units
218.672
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
for Subject
Emission
Units
SUBPART
DD:
AEROSOL
CAN
FILLING
Section
218.680
Applicability
218.686
Control
Requirements
218.688
Testing
218.690
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
for
Exempt
Emission
Units
218.692
Recordkeeping and Reporting
for
Subject
Emission
Units
SUBPART
FF:
BAKERY
OVENS
(REPEALED)
Section
218.720
Applicability (Repealed)
218.722
Control
Requirements
(Repealed)
218.726
Testing
(Repealed)
218.727
Monitoring
(Repealed)
218.728
Recordkeeping and Reporting
(Repealed)
218.729
Compliance
Date
(Repealed)
218.730
Certification
(Repealed)
SUBPART
GG:
MARINE
TERMINALS
Section
218.760
Applicability
218.762
Control
Requirements
218.764
Compliance Certification
218.766
Leaks
218.768
Testing
and
Monitoring
2 18.770
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
SUBPART
HH:
MOTOR
VEHICLE
REFINISHING
Section
218.780
Emission
Limitations
218.782
Alternative
Control
Requirements
218.784
Equipment
Specifications
218.786
Surface Preparation
Materials
218.787
Work Practices
218.788
Testing
218.789
Monitoring
and
Recordkeeping
for
Control
Devices
218.790
General
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
(Repealed)
218.79
1
Compliance
Date
218.792
Registration
218.875
Applicability
of
Subpart
BB
(Renumbered)
218.877
Emissions
Limitation
at
Polystyrene
Plants
(Renumbered)
218.879
Compliance
Date
(Repealed)
218.88
1
Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
218.883
Special
Requirements
for
Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
218.886
Emissions
Testing
(Renumbered)
SUBPART
PP:
MISCELLANEOUS
FABRICATED
PRODUCT
MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Section
218.920
Applicability
218.923
Permit
Conditions
(Repealed)
218.926
Control Requirements
218.927
Compliance
Schedule
218.928
Testing
218.929
Cementable
and
Dress
or
Performance
Shoe
Leather
SUBPART
QQ:
MISCELLANEOUS
FORMULATION
MANUFACTURING PROCESSES
Section
218.940
Applicability
218.943
Permit
Conditions
(Repealed)
2
18.946
Control Requirements
218.947
Compliance
Schedule
218.948
Testing
SUBPART
RR:
MISCELLANEOUS
ORGANIC
CHEMICAL
MANUFACTURING
PROCESSES
Section
218.960
Applicability
218.963
Permit
Conditions
(Repealed)
218.966
Control
Requirements
218.967
Compliance
Schedule
218.968
Testing
SUBPART
TT: OTHER
EMISSION
UNITS
Section
218.980
Applicability
218.983
Permit
Conditions
(Repealed)
218.986
Control
Requirements
218.987
Compliance
Schedule
218.988
Testing
SUBPART
UU:
RECORDKEEPING
AND
REPORTING
Section
218.990
Exempt
Emission
Units
218.991
Subject
Emission
Units
218.APPENDIX
A:
List
of Chemicals
Defining
Synthetic
Organic
Chemical
and Polymer
Manufacturing
218.APPENDIX
B:
VOM
Measurement
Techniques
for Capture
Efficiency
(Repealed)
218
.APPENDIX
C:
Reference
Methods
and Procedures
218
.APPENDIX
D:
Coefficients
for the Total
Resource
Effectiveness
Index
(TRE) Equation
218.APPENDIX
E:
List of
Affected
Marine
Terminals
218.APPENDIX
G:
TRE Index
Measurements
for
SOCMI
Reactors
and
Distillation
Units
218.APPENDIX
H:
Baseline
VOM
Content
Limitations
for
Subpart
F, Section
218.212
Cross-Line
Averaging
AUTHORITY:
Implementing
Section
10 and
authorized
by Sections
27,
28,
28.5
of the
Environmental
Protection
Act [415
ILCS
5/10 and
28.5].
SOURCE:
Adopted
at R91-7
at 15 Ill.
Reg.
12231,
effective
August
16, 1991;
amended
in
R91-24
at
16
Ill. Reg.
13564, effective
August
24, 1992;
amended
in R91-28
and
R91-
30
at
16
Ill. Reg.
13864, effective
August
24, 1992;
amended
in R93-9
at 17
Ill.
Reg.
16636,
effective
September
27, 1993;
amended
in R93-14
at
18
Ill.
Reg.
at
1945,
effective
January
24,
1994;
amended
in
R94-12 at
18 Ill.
Reg. 14973,
effective
September
21,
1994;
amended
in R94-15
at 18
Ill. Reg. 16392,
effective
October
25,
1994;
amended
in
R94-16
at 18 Ill.
Reg.
16950, effective
November
15, 1994;
amended
in
R94-21,
R94-3l and
R94-32
at
19 Ill. Reg.
6848,
effective
May
9,
1995;
amended
in
R94-33
at 19
111.
Reg. 7359,
effective
May
22,
1995;
amended
in R96-13
at 20 Ill. Reg.
14428,
effective
October
17, 1996;
amended
in
R97-24
at 21111.
Reg.
7708,
effective
June
9, 1997;
amended
in
R97-3l
at 22
Ill.
Reg.
3556,
effective
February
2, 1998;
amended
in
R98-16
at
22 Ill. Reg.
14282,
effective
July
16, 1998;
amended
in R02-20
at
27
111.
Reg 7283,
effective
April
8,
2003; amended
in
R04-12/20
at 30 Ill.
Reg. 9684,
effective
May 15,
2006;
amended
in
R06-21 at
31111.
Reg. 7086,
effective
April
30,
2007.
SUBPART
A:
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section
218.106
Compliance
Dates
a)
Except
as
otherwise provided
in this
Section
or as
otherwise
provided
in
a
specific
Subpart
of
this
Part,
compliance
with
the
requirements
of
all rules
is
required
by
July
1,
1991,
or
September
1,
1991,
for
all
sources
located
in
Cook,
DuPage,
Kane,
Lake,
McHenry,
or
Will
Counties,
consistent
with
the
appropriate
provisions
of
Section
218.103
of
this
Subpart.
b)
Except
as otherwise
provided
in
this
Section
or
as otherwise
provided
in
a
specific
Subpart
of
this
Part,
compliance
with
the
requirements
of
this
Part
is
required
by November
15,
1993,
for
all
sources
located
in
Aux
Sable
Township
or Goose Lake
Township
in Grundy
County,
or
in
Oswego
Township
in
Kendall
County.
c)
All
emission
units
which
meet
the
applicability
requirements
of
Sections
218.402(a)(2),
218.611(b),
218.620(b),
218.660(a),
218.680(a),
218.920(b),
218.940(b),
218.960(b)
or
218.980(b)
of this
Part,
including
emission
units
at
sources
which
are
excluded
from
the
applicability
criteria
of
Sections
21 8.402(a)(1),
218.611(a),
218.620(a),
218.920(a),
218.940(a),
218.960(a),
or
218.980(a)
of
this
Part
by
virtue
of
pennit
conditions
or
other
enforceable
means,
must
comply
with
the
requirements
of
Subparts
H,
Z,
AA,
CC,
DD,
PP,
QQ,
RR
or
TT
of this
Part,
respectively,
by
March
15,
1995.
Any
owner
or
operator
of
an emission
unit
which
has
already
met
the
applicability
requirements
of
Sections
21
8.402(a)(1),
218.611(a),
218.620(a),
218.920(a),
218.940(a),
218.960(a)
218.980(a)
of
this
Part
on
or by
the
effective
date
of
this
subsection
is
required
to
comply
with
all
compliance
dates
or
schedules
found
in
Sections
218.106(a)
or
218.106(b),
as
applicable.
d)
Any
owner
or
operator
of
a
source
with
an
emission
unit
subject
to
the
requirements
of Section
21
8.204(m)(2)
or
(m)(3)
of this
Part
shall
comply
with
those
requirements
by
March
25,
1995.
e)
Any
owner
or
operator
of
a
source
subject
to
the
requirements
of
Section
218.204(c)(2),
218.204(g)(2),
or
218.204(h)(2)
of
this
Part
shall
comply
with
the
applicable
requirements
in
such
Section(s), as
well
as all
applicable
requirements
in
Sections
2 18.205
through
218.214
and
218.218.,byMay
1,2011.
(Source: Amended at
_fl1.
Reg.
effective______
SUBPART
F:
COATING
OPERATIONS
Section
218.204
Emission
Limitations
Except
as
provided
in Sections
218.205,
218.207,
218.208,
218.212,
218.215
and
218.216
of this Subpart,
no
owner
or operator
of
a coating line
shall apply
at anytime
any
coating in
which
the
VOM
content exceeds
the
following
emission
limitations
for
the
specified
coating.
Except as
otherwise
provided
in Sections
218.204(c),
2 18.204(g),
218.204(h).
and
2
18.204(1),
compliance
with the emission
limitations
marked with
an
asterisk
in this
Section
is required
on and
after
March
15,
1996, and
compliance
with
emission
limitations
not marked
with
an
asterisk is
required
until March
15, 1996.
The
following
emission
limitations
are
expressed
in units
of VOM
per
volume
of coating
(minus
water and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM)
as applied
at each
coating
applicator,
except where
noted.
Compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from the
definition
of
VOM
should be treated
as water
for
the
purpose
of
calculating
the
“less
water” part
of the coating
composition.
Compliance
with
this
Subpart
must
be
demonstrated
through
the
applicable
coating
analysis
test
methods
and
procedures
specified
in
Section
218.105(a)
of this
Part and
the recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
specified
in Section
218.211(c)
of this
Subpart
except
where
noted.
(Note:
The
equation
presented
in Section
2 18.206 of
this
Part
shall
be
used to
calculate
emission
limitations
for
determining
compliance
by add-on
controls, credits
for
transfer
efficiency,
emissions
trades and
cross-line
averaging.)
The
emission
limitations
are
as follows:
a)
Automobile
or Light-Duty
Truck
Coating
kg/i
lb/gal
1)
Prime
coat
0.14
(1.2)
0.14*
(1.2)*
2)
Primer
surface
coat
1.81
(15.1)
1.81*
(15.1)*
(Note:
The primer
surface
coat limitation
is in
units of
kg (lbs)
of
VOM
per
1
(gal)
of coating
solids deposited.
Compliance
with
the
limitation
shall
be
based
on the daily-weighted
average
from an
entire
primer surfacer
operation.
Compliance
shall be
demonstrated
in
accordance
with the
topcoat protocol
referenced
in
Section
218.105(b)
and the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
specified in
Section
218.211(f).
Testing
to
demonstrate
compliance
shall be
performed
in
accordance
with
the
topcoat
protocol
and
a detailed
testing proposal
approved
by
the
Agency
and
USEPA specifying
the
method
of
demonstrating
compliance
with
the
protocol.
Section
218.205
does
not
apply
to
the
primer surfacer
limitation.)
kg/i
lb/gal
3)
Topcoat
1.81
(15.1)
1.81*
(15.1)*
(Note:
The
topcoat
limitation
is
in
units
of kg
(ibs)
of VOM
per
1
(gal)
of
coating
solids
deposited.
Compliance
with
the limitation
shall
be
based
on
the
dailyweighted
average
from
an entire
topcoat
operation.
Compliance
shall
be
demonstrated
in
accordance
with
the
topcoat
protocol
referenced
in
Section
218.105(b)
of this
Part
and
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
specified
in Section
218.21
1(f).
Testing
to
demonstrate
compliance
shall
be
performed
in
accordance
with
the
topcoat protocol
and
a detailed
testing
proposal
approved
by
the
Agency and
USEPA
specifying
the
method
of demonstrating
compliance
with
the
protocol.
Section
218.205
of
this
Part
does
not
apply
to
the
topcoat
limitation.)
kg/i
lb/gal
4)
Final
repair
coat
0.58
(4.8)
0.58*
(4.8)*
b)
Can
Coating
kg/i
lb/gal
1)
Sheet
basecoat
and
overvarnish
A)
Sheet
basecoat
0.34
(2.8)
0.26*
(2.2)*
B)
Overvamish
0.34
(2.8)
0.34
(2.8)*
2)
Exterior
basecoat
and
overvarnish
0.34
(2.8)
0.25*
(2.1)*
3)
Interior
body
spray
coat
A)
Two
piece
0.51
(4.2)
0.44*
(3.7)*
B)
Three
piece
0.51
(4.2)
0.51*
(4.2)*
4)
Exterior
end
coat
0.51
(4.2)
0.5
1*
(4.2)*
5)
Side
seam
spraycoat
0.66
(5.5)
0.66*
(5.5)*
6)
End sealing
compound
coat
0.44
(3.7)
0.44*
(3.7)*
kg/i
lb/gal
c)
Paper
Coating
0.35
(2.9)
0.28*
(2.3)*
1)
PriortoMayl,201l:
gi
lb/gal
028
2)
OnandafterMayl.2011:
kg
VOM/kg
kg
VOM/kg
(lb
VOM/ib)
(lb VOMI1b)
solids
applied
coatings
applied
A)
Pressure
sensitive
tape
and
label
surface
coatings
(0.067)
B)
All
other
paper
coatings
0.40
(0.08)
(Note:
The paper
coating
limitation
shall
not
apply
to any
owner
or
operator
of
any paper
coating
line
on
which
flexographic
or
rotogravure
printing
is
performed
if
the paper
coating
line
complies
with the
emissions
limitations
in
Section
218.401
of
this
Part.
In
addition,
screen
printing
on
paper
is
not regulated
as
paper
coating,
but
is
regulated
under
Subpart
TT
of this
Part.
On and
after
May
1,
2011,
the paper
coating
limitation
shall
also not
apply
to coating
performed
on or
in-line
with
any
digital
printing
press,
or
to size
presses
and
on-machine
coaters
on
papermaking
machines
applying
sizing
or
water-based
clays.)
lb/gal
d)
Coil
Coating
(2.6)
0.20*
(1.7)*
e)
Fabric
Coating
0.35
(2.9)
0.28*
(2.3)*
f)
Vinyl
Coating
0.45
(3.8)
0.28*
(2.3)*
g)
Metal
Furniture
Coating
I
I.
H
I
I
I*
I
It;
I
Itii
I
Iii
I
[
1°
I
10
0
I
D
I
I
I
I
I
lCD
I
l
I
lo
0
I
I
I
I
Ip
Ip
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
‘
IC
I
i
I
I
1°
lCD
0
10
0
1Ci2
C•)
10
CD
I
I
tI
jIP
I
lc
Ico
I3I
C
C
IC
IC
C
C
C
C
1C
C1C
r-’IC
bo
I
1
bo
IC
I
C
3C
fL
lCD
l
Airdried
2)
Baked
0736
0.28*
(Note:
On and after
May
1,
2011, these
limitations
shall
not apply
to
stencil
coatings,
safety-indicating
coatings,
solid-film
lubricants,
electric-insulating
and
thermal-conducting
coatings,
touch-up
and
repair coatings,
or
coating
applications
utilizing
hand-held
aerosol
cans.)
3)
On and
after May
1, 2011,
an owner
or
operator
of a coating
line
subject
to
the limitations
in
subsection
(g)
of
this
Section
shall
apply
all coatings
using one
or
more
of the following
application
methods:
A)
Electrostatic
spray;
B)
High
volume
low pressure
(HVLP)
spray
C)
Flow coating.
For the
purposes
of this
subsection
(g),
flow
coating means
a
non-atomized
technique
of applying
coating to
a substrate
with a
fluid nozzle
with
no air
supplied
to the nozzle;
D)
Roll coating;
E)
Dip coating,
including
electrodeposition.
For
purposes
of
this subsection
(g),
electrodeposition
means a
water-borne
dip
coating
process
in which
opposite
electrical
charges
are
applied
to the substrate
and
the
coating.
The
coating
is
attracted
to the substrate
due
to the electrochemical
G)
Pretreatment
Coatings
H)
Solar
Absorbent
i)
Air Dried
(3.5)
0.420
(3.5)
0.420
(3.5)
0.360
(3.0)
0736
p34*
ii)
Baked
0.80
(6.7)
0.80
0.61
Lfl
(2.8)*
(2.3)*
tJQ
CD
H.
C
0
I.
I
‘0
F’
H
I
I
I
I
0
0
,
0
CD
IrJ
j.
I
,
‘
I-
‘p—
•
1°
II
1°
I
.
;
I
CD
ci
I
1°
i
,
CD
I.
I.
•
IC)
i
i
i
a
I
IC)
10
o
I
0
I°
I
C)
0
Q)CD
CD
1°
C;,)
CD
C;,)
C)
I-i
-
CD
IC
I
00
I4’
C
C
C
C
(J
C
Ji
-
0
It,
o
-
CD
-
C
pI
-I
1
1
Iz
p
i
1’
I’—
I’—.I
I.
IC)
p
B)
Heat Resistant
i)
Air Dried
0.420
0.80
(6.7)
ii)
Baked
0.360
i61
(3.0)
(5.1)
F)
Metallic
0.420
0.80
(6.7)
G)
Pretreatment
Coatings
0.420
0.80
(6.7)
H)
Solar Absorbent
i)
Air Dried
0.420
0.80
(6.7)
ii)
Baked
0.360
0.61
(3.0)
(5.1)
1)
ur urieu
34
(2-8
p34*
(2.8)*
2)
Baked
O.34
(2.8)
0.28*
(2.3)*
(Note:
The limitation
shall not apply
to the use
of quick-drying
lacquers for repair
of scratches
and nicks that occur
during
assembly,
provided that the volume
of coating
does not
exceed
0.95
1(1 quart)
in any one rolling
eight-hour
period. On and after
May
1, 2011,
these limitations shall
also
not apply
to
stencil
coatings,
safety-
indicating coatings,
solid-film
lubricants, electric-insulating
and
thermal-conducting
coatings,
touch-up
and repair
coatings,
or
coating applications
utilizing
hand-held aerosol
cans.)
3)
On and after
May 1,2011,
an owner or
operator of a coating
line
subject
to the
limitations in subsection
(h)
of this
Section
shall
apply
all coatings
using
one
or more
of
the following
application
methods:
A)
Electrostatic
spray;
B)
High
volume low
nressure (HVLP)
sorav:
C)
Flow
coating.
For
the
purposes
of
this
subsection
(h),
flow
coating
means
a
non-atomized
technique
of
applying
coating
to
a
substrate
with a
fluid
nozzle
with
no
air
supplied
to
the
nozzle;
L
Roll
coating;
B)
Brush coating;
F)
Dip
coating,
including
electrodeposition.
For
purposes
of
this subsection
(h),
electrodeposition
means
a
water-borne
dip
coating
process
in
which
opposite
electrical
charges
are
applied
to
the
substrate
and
the
coating.
The coating
is
attracted
to
the
substrate
due
to
the
electrochemical
potential
difference
that
is
created;
or
B)
Baked
3)
Steel
pail
and
drum
interior
coating
lb/gal
(1.7)
(l.7)*
G)
Another
coating
application
method
capable
of
achieving
a
transfer
efficiency
equal to
or
better
than
that achieved
by
HVLP
spraying,
if
such
method
is
approved
in
writing
by
the
Agency.
kg/i
i)
Magnet
Wire
Coating
0.20
0.20*
j)
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
Coating
1)
Clear
coating
0.52
(4.3)
0.52*
(4.3)*
2)
Extreme
perfonnance
coating
A)
Air
dried
0.42
(3.5)
0.42*
(3.5)*
0.42
(3.5)
0.40*
(33)*
0.52
(4.3)
0.52*
(4.3)*
4)
All
other
coatings
A)
Air
Dried
0.42
(3.5)
0.40*
(3.3)*
B)
Baked
0.36
(3.0)
0.34*
(2.8)*
5)
Marine
engine
coating
A)
Air
Dried
0.42
(3.5)
0.42*
(3.5)*
B)
Baked
i)
Primer/Topcoat
0.42
(3.5)
0.42*
(35)*
ii)
Corrosion resistant
0.42
(3.5)
hasecoat
0.28*
(2.3)*
C)
Clear
Coating
0.52
(4.3)
0.52*
(4.3)*
6)
Metallic
Coating
A)
Air
Dried
0.42
(3.5)
0.42*
(35)*
B)
Baked
0.36
(3.0)
0.36
(3.0)*
7)
Definitions
A)
For
purposes
of
subsection
21
8.204(j)(5) of
this
Section,
the
following
terms
are
defined:
i)
“Corrosion resistant
basecoat”
means,
for
purposes
of
subsection
218.204(j)(5)(B)(ii)
of
this
Section,
a
water-borne
epoxy
coating
applied
via
an
electrodeposition
process
to
a metal
surface
prior
to
spray
coating,
for the
purpose
of
enhancing
corrosion
resistance.
ii)
“Electrodeposition
process”
means,
for
purposes
of
subsection
2l8.204(j)(5)
of
this
Section,
a water
borne
dip
coating
process
in
which
opposite
electrical
charges
are
applied
to
the
substrate
and
the
coating.
The
coating
is
attracted
to
the
substrate
due
to the
electrochemical
potential
difference
that
is created.
iii)
“Marine
engine
coating”
means,
for
purposes
of
subsection
218.204(j)(5)
of
this
Section,
any
extreme
performance
protective,
decorative
or
functional
coating
applied
to
an engine
that
is used
to
propel
watercraft.
B)
For
purposes
of subsection
218.204(j)(6)
of
this
Section,
“metallic
coating”
means
a
coating
which
contains
more
than
1/4
lb/gal
of
metal
particles,
as
applied.
k)
Heavy Off-Highway
Vehicle
Products
kg/i
lb/gal
Coating
1)
Extreme
performance
prime
coat
0.42
(3.5)
0.42*
(3.5)*
2)
Extreme
performance
topcoat
(air
0.42
(3.5)
dried)
0.42*
(3.5)*
3)
Final
repair
coat
(air
dried)
0.42
(3.5)
0.42*
(3.5)*
4)
All
other
coatings
are
subject
to the
emission
limitations
for
miscellaneous
metal
parts
and
products
coatings
in
subsection
(j)
above.
1)
Wood Furniture
Coating
1)
Limitations
before
March
15,
kg/I
lb/gal
1998:
A)
Clear
topcoat
0.67
(5.6)
B)
Opaque stain
0.56
(4.7)
C)
Pigmented
coat
0.60
(5.0)
D)
Repair coat
0.67
(5.6)
E)
Sealer
0.67
(5.6)
F)
Semi-transparent
stain
0.79
(6.6)
G)
Wash
coat
0.73
(6.1)
(Note:
Prior to March
15, 1998, an
owner or
operator of
a
wood
furniture
coating operation
subject
to
this Section
shall
apply all
coatings,
with the exception
of
no
more
than
37.8
1(10
gal)
of
coating
per day
used for touch-up
and
repair
operations,
using
one or
more of
the
following
application
systems:
airless spray
application
system,
air-assisted
airless
spray
application
system,
electrostatic
spray
application
system,
electrostatic
bell
or disc spray
application
system,
heated
airless
spray
application
system,
roller
coating,
brush or
wipe coating
application
system,
dip
coating
application
system or
high volume
low pressure
(HVLP)
application
system.)
2)
On
and after
March 15,
1998, wood
furniture
sealers and
topcoats
must comply
with
one of
the limitations
specified
in
subsections
(l)(2)(A)
through
(B),
below:
kg
VOM/kg
lb VOM/ib
solids
solids
A)
Topcoat
0.8
(0.8)
B)
Sealers and
topcoats
with
the following
limits:
i)
Sealerotherthan
1.9
(1.9)
acid-cured
alkyd
amino
vinyl sealer
ii)
Topcoat
other
than
1.8
(1.8)
acid-cured
alkyd
amino
conversion
varnish
topcoat
iii)
Acid-cured
alkyd
2.3
(2.3)
amino
vinyl
sealer
iv)
Acid-cured
alkyd
2.0
(2.0)
amino
conversion
varnish
topcoat
C)
Meet the
provisions
of Section
218.215
of this
Subpart
for
use
of
an
averaging
approach;
D)
Achieve
a reduction
in
emissions
equivalent
to
the
requirements
of
subsection
(l)(2)(A)
or
(B)
of
this
Section,
as
calculated
using
Section
218.216
of
this
Subpart;
or
E)
Use
a combination
of
the
methods
specified
in
subsections
(l)(2)(A)
through
(D)
of
this
Section.
3)
Other
wood furniture
coating
limitations
on
and
after
March
15,
1998:
kg/i
lb/gal
A)
Opaque
stain
0.56
(4.7)
B)
Non-topcoat
pigmented
0.60
(5.0)
coat
C)
Repair
coat
0.67
(5.6)
D)
Semi-transparent
stain
0.79
(6.6)
E)
Wash
coat
0.73
(6.1)
4)
Other wood furniture
coating
requirements
on
and
after
March
15,
1998:
A)
No
source
subject
to
the
limitations
of
subsection
(l)(2)
or
(3)
of
this
Section
and
utilizing
one
or
more
wood
furniture
coating
spray
booths
shall use
strippable
spray
booth
coatings
containing
more
than
0.8
kg
VOM/kg
solids
(0.8
lb
VOM/ib
solids),
as
applied.
B)
Any
source
subject
to
the
limitations
of
subsection
(1)(2)
or
(3)
of
this
Section
shall
comply
with
the
requirements
of
Section
218.217
of
this
Subpart.
C)
Any
source
subject
to
the
limitations
of
subsection
(l)(2)(A)
or
(B)
of
this
Section
and
utilizing
one
or
more
continuous
coaters
shall, for
each
continuous
coater,
use
an
initial
coating
which
complies
with
the
limitations
of
subsection
(1)(2)(A)
or
(B)
of
this
Section.
The
viscosity
of
the
coating
in
each
reservoir
shall
always
be
greater
than
or
equal
to
the
viscosity
of
the
initial
coating
in
the
reservoir.
The
owner
or
operator
shall:
i)
Monitor the viscosity
of
the coating
in the reservoir
with a
viscosity meter or
by
testing
the viscosity
of
the initial
coating and retesting the coating
in the
reservoir
each
time solvent is added;
ii)
Collect and record the reservoir
viscosity and
the
amount
and weight
of
VOM per
weight of solids
of
coating and
solvent each time coating
or solvent
is
added; and
iii)
Maintain these
records at the source
for a period
of
three years.
m)
Existing Diesel-Electric Locomotive
kg/i
lb/gal
Coating
Lines in Cook
County
1)
Extreme performance prime
coat
0.42
(3.5)
0.42*
(35)*
2)
Extreme performance top-coat
(air 0.42
(3.5)
dried)
0.42*
(3.5)*
3)
Final repair
coat (air
dried)
0.42
(3.5)
0.42*
(35)*
4)
High-temperature aluminum
0.72
(6.0)
coating
0.72*
(6.0)*
5)
All
other coatings
0.36
(3.0)
0.36*
(3.0)*
n)
Plastic Parts Coating:
kg/i
lb/gal
Automotive/Transportation
1)
Interiors
A)
Baked
i)
Color coat
0.49*
(41)*
ii)
Primer
0.46*
(3.8)*
B)
Air
Dried
i)
Color
coat
0.38*
(3.2)*
ii)
Primer
0.42*
(35)*
2)
Exteriors
(flexible and
non-
flexible)
A)
Baked
i)
Primer
0.60*
(5.0)*
ii)
Primer
non-flexible
0.54*
(45)*
iii)
Clear coat
0.52*
(43)*
iv)
Color coat
0.55*
(4.6)*
B)
Air Dried
i)
Primer
0.66*
(55)*
ii)
Clear
coat
0.54*
(45)*
iii)
Color
coat
(red
&
0.67*
(5.6)*
black)
iv)
Color coat
(others)
0.6
1*
(5
1)*
3)
Specialty
A)
Vacuum
metallizing
0.66*
(5.5)*
basecoats,
texture
basecoats
B)
Black coatings,
reflective
0.7
1*
(5.9)*
argent
coatings,
air bag
cover
coatings,
and soft
coatings
C)
Gloss reducers,
vacuum
0.77*
(6.4)*
metallizing
topcoats,
and
texture
topcoats
D)
Stencil
coatings,
adhesion
0.82*
(6.8)*
primers,
ink pad
coatings,
electrostatic
prep coatings,
and resist
coatings
E)
Head
lamp lens coatings
0.89*
(7.4)*
o)
Plastic Parts
Coating:
Business
Machine
kg/i
lb/gal
1)
Primer
0.14*
(1.2)*
2)
Color
coat
(non-texture
coat)
0.28*
(2.3)*
3)
Colorcoat(texturecoat)
0.28*
(2.3)*
4)
Electromagnetic
interference/radio
0.48*
(4.0)*
frequency
interference
(EMI/RFI)
shielding
coatings
5)
Specialty
Coatings
A)
Soft
coat
0.52*
(43)*
B)
Plating
resist
0.71*
(5.9)*
C)
Plating
sensitizer
0.85*
(7.1)*
(Source:
Amended
at _lll.
Reg.
effective______
Section
218.205
Daily-Weighted
Average
Limitations
No owner
or
operator of
a coating
line
subject
to the limitations
of Section
218.204
of
this
Subpart
and
complying
by
means
of this Section
shall operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless the
owner
or operator
has
demonstrated
compliance
with
subsection
(a),
(b), (c),
(d), (e), (f),
(g),
(h)
of-(i),
or
(1)
of this
Section
(depending
upon
the category
of coating)
through
the
applicable
coating
analysis
test
methods
and
procedures
specified
in Section
218.105(a)
of this
Part and
the recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
specified
in
Section
218.211(d)
of this
Subpart:
a)
No
owner
or
operator of
a
coating
line subject
to
only
one
of the
limitations
from among
Section
218.204(a)(1),
(a)(4),
e-(d),
(e),
(f),
e
(i),
or, prior
to
May
1, 2011,
(c)
of this Subpart
shall apply
coatings
on any
such coating
line, during
any day,
whose
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
exceeds the
emission
limitation to
which
the coatings
are
subject.
b)
No
owner
or operator
of a miscellaneous
metal
parts and
products
coating
line subject
to
the limitations
of
Section
218.204(j)
of
this
Subpart
shall
apply
coatings
to miscellaneous
metal
parts or
products
on the subject
coating
line unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)(1)
or (b)(2)
of this
Section
are met.
1)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
multiple
coatings,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
218.204(j)
during
the
same
day
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on
the
line
are
subject
to
0.42
kgll
[3.5
lbs/gal]),
the
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
shall
not
exceed
the
coating
VOM
content
limit
corresponding
to
the
category
of
coating
used,
or
2)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
coatings
subject
to
more
than
one
numerical
emission
limitation
in
Section
218.204(j)
of
this
Subpart,
during
the
same
day,
the
owner
or
operator
shall
have
a
site-specific
proposal
approved
by
the
Agency
and
approved
by
the
USEPA
as
a
SIP
revision.
To
receive
approval,
the
requirements
of
USEPA’s
Emissions
Trading
Policy
Statement
(and
related
policy)
51
Fed.
Reg.
43814
(December
4,
1986),
must
be
satisfied.
c)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a
can
coating
line
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204(b)
of
this
Subpart
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
using
a
coating
with
a
VOM
content
in
excess
of
the
limitations
specified
in
Section
218.204(b)
of
this
Subpart
unless
all
of
the
following
requirements
are
met:
1)
An
alternative
daily
emission
limitation
shall
be
determined
for
the
can
coating
operation,
i.e.
for
all
of
the
can
coating
lines
at
the
source,
according
to
subsection
(c)(2)
of
this
Section.
Actual
daily
emissions
shall
never
exceed
the
alternative
daily
emission
limitation
and
shall
be
calculated
by
use
of
the
following
equation.
where:
Ed
=
Actual
VOM
emissions
for
the
day
in
units
of
kg/day
(lbs/day);
i
=
Subscript
denoting
a
specific
coating
applied;
n
Total
number
of
coatings
applied
in
the
can
coating
operation,
i.e.
all
can
coating
lines
at
the
source;
V
1
=
Volume
of
each
coating
applied
for
the
day
in
units
of
1/day
(gal!day)
of
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM);
C
=
The VOM
content
of each
coating
as
applied in
units of
kg VOM/l
(lbs
VOM/gal)
of coating
(minus
water
and
any compounds
which are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM).
2)
The alternative
daily
emission
limitation
(Ad)
shall
be determined
for the
can coating
operation,
i.e.
for
all
of the
can
coating
lines at
the
source, on
a daily basis
as follows:
A
=VLjCj
d
1=1
where:
Ad
= The
VOM emissions
allowed
for
the
day
in
units of
kg/day
(lbs/day);
i
=
Subscript
denoting
a
specific coating
applied;
n =
Total number
of surface
coatings
applied in
the can coating
operation;
C
1
=
The VOM
content
of each surface
coating
as applied
in
units
of
kg
VOM/l
(lbs VOM/gal)
of
coating
(minus
water
and any
compounds
which are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of VOM);
D
1
=
The density
of VOM
in each
coating applied.
For
the
purposes
of
calculating
Ad,
the
density
is
0.882
kg VOM/l
VOM (7.36
lbs VOM/gal
VOM);
V1
=
Volume
of
each surface
coating
applied
for the day
in
units
of 1 (gal)
of
coating
(minus water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM);
L
1
=
The VOM
emission
limitation
for
each
surface
coating
applied as
specified
in Section
218.204(b)
of this
Subpart
in
units of
kg VOM/l
(lbs VOM/gal)
of
coating
(minus
water
and any
compounds
which
are specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of VOM).
d)
No
owner
or
operator
of a
heavy off-highway
vehicle
products
coating
line
subject
to
the limitations
of
Section 218.204(k)
of
this
Subpart
shall
apply
coatings
to
heavy
off-highway
vehicle
products
on the subject
coating line
unless the
requirements
of subsection
(d)(l)
or
(d)(2) of this
Section
are
met.
1)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
multiple
coatings,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
218.204(k)
of
this
Subpart,
during
the
same
day
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on
the
line
are
subject
to
0.42
kg/i
(3.5
lbs/gal)),
the
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
shall
not
exceed
the
coating
VOM
content
limit
corresponding
to
the
category
of
coating
used,
or
2)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
coatings
subject
to
more
than
one
numerical
emission
limitation
in
Section
218.204(k)
of
this
Subpart,
during
the
same
day,
the
owner
or
operator
shall
have
a
site
specific
proposal
approved
by
the
Agency
and
approved
by
the
USEPA as
a
SIP
revision.
To
receive
approval,
the
requirements
of
USEPA’s
Emissions
Trading
Policy
Statement
(and
related
policy)
51
Fed.
Reg.
43814
(December
4, 1986),
must
be
satisfied.
e)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a
wood
furniture
coating
line
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section 218.204(l)(l)
or
(l)(3)
of
this
Subpart
shall
apply
coatings
to wood
furniture
on
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
of
subsection
(e)(
1)
or
subsection
(e)(2)
of
this
Section,
in
addition
to
the
requirements
specified
in
the
note
to
Section
218
.204(l)(1)
of this
Subpart,
are
met.
1)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
multiple
coatings,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
218.204(l)(1)
or
(l)(3)
of
this
Subpart,
during
the
same
day
(e.g., all coatings
used
on
the
line
are
subject
to
0.67
kg/i
(5.6
lbs/gal)),
the
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
shall
not
exceed
the
coating
VOM
content
limit
corresponding
to
the
category
of
coating
used,
or
2)
For
each
coating line
which
applies
coatings
subject
to more
than
one
numerical
emission
limitation
in
Section
2l8.204(l)(1)
or
(l)(3)
of
this
Subpart,
during
the
same
day,
the
owner
or
operator
shall
have
a
site
specific
proposal
approved
by
the
Agency
and
approved
by
the
USEPA
as
a SIP
revision.
To
receive
approval,
the
requirements
of USEPA’s
Emissions
Trading
Policy
Statement
(and
related
policy)
51
Fed.
Reg.
43814
(December
4,
1986),
must
be
satisfied.
f)
No
owner
or
operator
of
an
existing
diesel-electric
locomotive
coating
line
in
Cook
County,
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204(m)
of
this
Subpart
shall
apply coatings
to
diesel-electric
locomotives
on
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
of
subsection
(f)(l)
or
(f)(2)
of
this
Section
are
met.
1)
For each
coating
line
which
applies
multiple
coatings,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section 2
18.204(m)
of this Subpart,
during
the
same
day (e.g.,
all
coatings
used on the
line are
subject to
0.42
kg/i (3.5
lbs/gal)),
the
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
shall
not
exceed
the coating
VOM
content
limit
corresponding
to
the category
of coating
used,
or
2)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
coatings
subject
to
more than
one
numerical
emission
limitation
in Section 218.204(m)
of
this
Subpart,
during
the same day,
the owner
or
operator
shall
have a
site
specific
proposal
approved
by
the Agency
and approved
by
the
USEPA
as a SIP
revision.
To receive
approval,
the requirements
of USEPA’s
Emissions
Trading
Policy
Statement
(and
related
policy)
must be
satisfied.
g)
No
owner or
operator of
a
plastic
parts
coating
line, subject
to the
limitations
of
Section 218.204(n)
or
(o)
of
this
Subpart
shall
apply
coatings
to business
machine
or automotive/transportation
plastic
parts on
the
subject
coating line
unless
the requirements
of subsection
(g)(
1) or
(g)(2)
of this
Section are
met:
1)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
multiple
coatings,
all of which
are
subject to
the same numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
218.204(n)
or (o)
of this
Subpart,
during
the same
day
(e.g., all
coatings
used on
the line
are subject
to
0.42
kg/i
(3.5
lbs/gal)),
the
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
shall
not
exceed
the coating
VOM
content limit
corresponding
to the
category
of
coating
used; or
2)
For
each coating
line
which
applies
coatings
subject to
more
than
one
numerical
emission
limitation
in
Section
2
18.204(n)
or (o)
of
this
Subpart,
during
the same
day,
the
owner
or
operator
shall
have
a site
specific
proposal
approved
by
the
Agency
and
approved
by
the
USEPA
as a
SIP
revision.
To receive
approval,
the
requirements
of USEPA’s
Emissions
Trading
Policy
Statement
(and
related
policy)
must
be
satisfied.
h)
No
owner
or operator
of a
metal
furniture
coating
line,
subject
to the
limitations
of Section
218.204(g)
of this
Subpart
shall apply
coatings
on
the
subject
coating
line unless
the requirements
of subsection
(h)(1)
or
(h)(2)
of this Section
are
met:
1)
For each
coating
line which
applies
multiple
coatings,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
218.204(g)
of
this
Subpart,
during
the
same
day
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on
the
line
are
subject
to 0.34
kg/i
(2.8
lbs/gal)),
the
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
shall
not
exceed
the
coating
VOM
content
limit
corresponding
to
the
category
of
coating
used;
or
2)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
coatings
subject
to
more than
one
numerical
emission
limitation
in
Section
218.204(g)
of
this
Subpart,
during the
same
day,
the
owner
or
operator
shall have
a
site
specific
proposal
approved
by
the
Agency
and
approved
by
the
USEPA
as
a
SIP
revision.
To
receive
approval,
the
requirements
of
USEPA’s
Emissions
Trading
Policy
Statement
(and
related
policy)
must
be
satisfied.
i)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a
large
appliance
coating
line,
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204(h)
of
this
Subpart
shall
apply
coatings
on
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
of
subsection
(i)(l)
or
(i)(2) of
this
Section
are
met:
1)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
multiple
coatings,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
218.204(h)
of
this
Subpart,
during
the
same
day
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on
the
line
are
subject
to
0.34
kg/i
(2.8
lbs/gal)),
the
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
shall
not
exceed
the
coating
VOM content
limit
corresponding
to
the
category
of coating
used,
or
2)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
coatings
subject
to more
than
one
numerical
emission
limitation
in
Section
2
18.204(h)
of
this
Subpart, during
the
same
day,
the
owner
or
operator
shall
have
a
site
specific
proposal
approved
by
the
Agency
and
approved
by
the
USEPA
as
a
SIP
revision.
To
receive
approval,
the
requirements
of
USEPA’s
Emissions
Trading
Policy
Statement
(and
related
policy)
must
be
satisfied.
On
and
afler
May
1, 2011,
no
owner
or
operator
of
a
paper
coating
line
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204(c)
of this
Subpart
shall
apply
coatings
on
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(j)(l)
or
(j)(2)
of
this
Section
are
met:
1)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
multiple
coatings,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
218.204(c)
during
the
same
day
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on
the
line
are
subject
to
0.40
kg/kg
solids
E0.08
kg/kg
coatingsl),
the
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
shall
not
exceed
the
coating
VOM content
limit
corresponding
to the category
of
coating used;
or
2)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
coatings
subject
to more
than
one
numerical
emission
limitation
in
Section
218.204(c)
during
the
same
day, the
owner
or
operator
shall
have a site-specific
proposal
approved
by
the
Agency and
approved
by
the
USEPA
as a SIP
revision.
To receive
approval,
the
requirements
of USEPA’s
Emissions
Trading
Policy
Statement
(and
related
policy),
51 Fed.
Reg. 43814
(December
4,
1986),
must be
satisfied.
(Source:
Amended
at
_I11. Reg.
effective______
Section
218.207
Alternative
Emission
Limitations
a)
Any
owner
or
operator
of a
coating
line subject
to Section
218.204
of this
Subpart
may comply
with
this Section,
rather
than
with
Section 218.204
of
this
Subpart,
if a capture
system
and
control
device are
operated
at all
times the
coating
line
is
in operation
and
the
owner
or
operator
demonstrates
compliance
with
subsections
(c),
(d),
(e),
(f),
(g),
(h),
(i),
(j),
ef-(k), or
(1)
of this
Section
(depending
upon
the
source
category)
through
the
applicable
coating
analysis and
capture
system
and
control device
efficiency
test methods
and
procedures
specified
in
Section 218.105
of
this Part
and the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
specified
in
Section
218.211(e)
of
this Subpart;
and
the
control
device is equipped
with
the
applicable
monitoring
equipment
specified
in
Section 218.105(d)
of
this
Part and the
monitoring
equipment
is installed,
calibrated,
operated
and
maintained
according
to
vendor
specifications
at all times
the control
device
is in use.
A capture
system
and
control
device,
which
does
not
demonstrate
compliance
with
subsection
(c), (d),
(e), (f),
(g),
(h), (i),
(j),
or
(1)
of
this
Section
maybe
used
as
an
alternative
to compliance
with
Section
218.204
of this
Subpart
only
if the
alternative
is
approved
by
the
Agency and
approved
by
the USEPA
as a
SIP
revision.
b)
Alternative
Add-On
Control Methodologies
1)
The
coating
line is
equipped
with
a capture
system and
control
device that
provides
81 percent
reduction
in
the
overall
emissions
of VOM
from
the coating
line and
the control
device has
a
90
percent efficiency,
or
2)
The
system
used
to
control
VOM
from the
coating line
is
demonstrated
to
have
an overall
efficiency
sufficient
to
limit
VOM
emissions
to no more
than
what
is allowed
under Section
2
18.204
of this
Subpart. Use
of
any control
system
other
than
an
afterburner,
carbon
adsorption,
condensation,
or absorption
scrubber
system
can
be
allowed
only
if
approved
by
the
Agency
and
approved
by
the
USEPA
as
a SIP
revision.
The
use
of
transfer
efficiency
credits can
be
allowed
only
if
approved
by
the
Agency
and
approved
by
the
USEPA
as
a
SIP
revision.
Baseline
transfer
efficiencies
and
transfer
efficiency
test
methods
must
be
approved
by
the
Agency
and
the
USEPA.
Such
overall
efficiency
is to
be
determined
as
follows:
A)
Obtain
the
emission
limitation
from
the
appropriate
subsection
in
Section
218.204
of
this
Subpart;
B)
Calculate
“S”
according
to
the
equation
in
Section
218.206
of
this
Subpart;
C)
Calculate
the
overall
efficiency
required
according
to
Section
218.105(e)
of
this
Part.
For
the
purposes
of
calculating
this
value,
according
to
the
equation
in
Section
218.105(e)(2)
of
this
Part,
VOM
1
is
equal
to
the
value
of
“Sfl
as
determined
above
in
subsection
(b)(2)(B)
of
this
Section.
c)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a
coating
line
subject
to
only
one
of
the
emission
limitations
from among
Section
218.204(a)(1),
(a)(4),
e-(d),
(e),
(f),
e
(i),
or,
prior
to
May
1,
2011,
(c)
of
this
Subpart
and
equipped
with
a
capture
system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)(i)
or
(b)(2)
of
this
Section
are
met.
No
owner
or
operator
of
a
coating
line
subject to
Section
21
8.204(a)(2)
or
218.204(a)(3)
and
equipped
with
a
capture
system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the
coating
line
unless
the
owner
or
operator
demonstrates
compliance
with
such
limitation
in
accordance
with
the
topcoat
protocol
referenced
in
Section
218.105(b).
d)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a
miscellaneous
metal
parts
and
products
coating
line
which
applies
one
or
more
coatings
during
the
same
day,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
218.204(j)
of
this
Subpart
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on
the
line
are
subject
to
0.42
kg/i
[3.5
lbs/gal],
and
which
is
equipped
with
a
capture
system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)(i)
or
(b)(2)
of
this
Section
are
met.
e)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a
heavy
off-highway
vehicle
products
coating
line
which
applies
one
or
more
coatings
during
the
same
day,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
218.204(k)
of
this
Subpart
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on
the
line
are
subject
to
0.42
kg/i
[3.5
lbs/gal]),
and which
is equipped
with
a
capture
system
and
control
device shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)(1)
or
(b)(2)
of this Section
are met.
f)
No
owner
or
operator
of
an existing
diesel-electric
locomotive
coating
line
in
Cook County
which
applies one
or more
coatings
during the
same
day,
all
of which
are subject
to the same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
2 18.204(m)
of this
Subpart
(e.g.,
all coatings
used
on the line
are
subject
to 0.42 kg/i
[3.5
lbs/gal]),
and
which
is
equipped
with
a capture
system and
control
device shall
operate
the subject
coating
line unless
the
requirements
in subsection
(b)(i) or (b)(2)
of
this Section
are met.
g)
No
owner
or operator
of a
wood
furniture
coating
line
which
applies
one
or
more
coatings during
the
same
day,
all
of which
are subject
to the
same
numerical
emission limitation
within
Section
218.204(1)
of
this Subpart
(e.g., all
coatings
used
on
the line
are subject
to
0.67 kg/l
[5.6 lbs/gal]),
and which
is equipped
with a capture
system
and
control device
shall
operate
the subject
coating
line unless
the
requirements
in subsection
(b)(1) or (b)(2)
of this
Section are
met.
If compliance
is achieved
by
meeting
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)(2)
of
this Section,
then the
provisions
in the note
to Section
2 18.204(1)
of this
Subpart
must also
be
met.
h)
No
owner
or
operator
of a can
coating
line which
is equipped
with
a
capture
system
and
control
device shall
operate
the subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(h)(1) or
(h)(2)
of this
Section
are
met.
1)
An
alternative
daily
emission
limitation
shall
be determined
for
the can
coating
operation,
i.e. for
all of the
can coating
lines
at the
source,
according
to
Section
218.205(c)(2)
of this Subpart.
Actual
daily
emissions
shall
never exceed
the
alternative
daily
emission
limitation
and
shall
be
calculated
by use
of the following
equation:
n
Ed=ZV
1
C
1
(1-Fi)
i=i
where:
Ed
=
Actual
VOM emissions
for
the
day
in units of
kg/day
(lbs/day);
i
=
Subscript
denoting
the specific
coating
applied;
n
=
Total
number
of
surface coatings
as
applied
in the can
coating
operation;
V
1
Volume
of
each
coating
as applied
for
the
day
in
units
of
1/day
(gal/day)
of coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM);
C
1
=
The
VOM
content
of
each
coating
as
applied
in units
of kg
VOMJ1
(lbs
VOMJgal)
of coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM);
and
F
=
Fraction,
by
weight,
of
VOM
emissions
from
the
surface
coating,
reduced
or
prevented
from
being
emitted
to
the
ambient
air.
This
is
the
overall
efficiency
of
the
capture
system
and
control
device.
2)
The
coating
line
is
equipped
with
a
capture
system
and
control
device
that
provide 75
percent
reduction
in
the
overall
emissions
of
VOM
from
the
coating
line
and
the
control
device
has
a
90
percent
efficiency.
i)
No
owner
or
operator
of a
plastic
parts
coating
line
which
applies
one
or
more
coatings during
the
same
day,
all
of which
are
subject
to
the same
numerical emission
limitation
within
Section
218.204(n)
or
(o)
of
this
Subpart
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on
the line
are
subject
to
0.42
kg/l
[3.5
lbs/gal]),
and
which
is equipped
with
a capture
system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)(l)
or
(b)(2)
of
this
Section
are
met.
j)
Prior
to
May
1,
2011.
noNe
owner
or
operator
of
a
metal
furniture
coating
line
which
applies
one
or
more
coatings
during
the
same
day,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
218.204(g)
of
this
Subpart
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on
the
line
are subject
to
0.34
kg/l
[2.8
lbs/gal]), and
which
is
equipped
with
a capture
system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)( 1)
or
(b)(2)
of this
Section
are
met.
k)
Prior
to May
1,
2011,
noNe
owner
or
operator
of
a
large
appliance
coating
line
which
applies
one
or
more
coatings
during
the
same
day,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
2
18.204(h)
of
this
Subpart
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on the
line
are
subject
to
0.34
kg/l
[2.8
lbs/gal]),
and
which
is
equipped
with
a
capture
system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)(
1)
or
(b)(2)
of
this
Section
are
met.
1)
On and
after
May
1, 2011,
no
owner
or
operator
of a paper
coating
line,
metal
furniture
coating
line,
or
large
appliance
coating
line which
is
equipped
with
a
capture
system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless
either:
1’)
The
capture
system
and
control
device
provide
at
least
90
percent
reduction
in the
overall
emissions
of VOM
from
the coating
line
or
Compliance
Schedule
2)
The
owner
or
operator
complies
with
the
applicable
limitation
set
forth
in
Section
218.204
of this
Subpart
by
utilizing
a combination
of low-VOM
coatings
and a
capire
system
and
control
device.
(Source:
Amended
at
_Ill.
Reg.
effective______
Section
218.210
Every
owner
or
operator
of a
coating
line
(of a
type included
within
Section
218.204
of
this Subpart)
shall
comply
with
the
requirements
of
Section
218.204,
218.205,
218.207
or
218.208
and
Section
218.211
or
Sections
218.212
and
218.213
of
this Subpart
in
accordance
with
the appropriate
compliance
schedule
as specified
in
subsection
(a),
(b),
(c), (d),
(e)
1
ef-(f),
or
(g)
below:
a)
No
owner
or operator
of a coating
line
which
is
exempt
from
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204
of
this
Subpart
because
of the
criteria
in
Section
218.208(a)
or
(b) of
this Subpart
shall operate
said coating
line
on
or after
a date
consistent
with
Section
2 18.106
of
this Part,
unless
the
owner
or
operator
has
complied
with,
and
continues
to
comply
with,
Section
218.211(b)
of this
Subpart.
b)
No owner
or
operator
of a coating
line
complying
by means
of Section
2
18.204
of
this
Subpart
shall
operate
said coating
line
on or
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of this
Part,
unless
the owner
or
operator
has
complied
with,
and
continues
to
comply
with,
Sections
218.204
and
218.211(c)
of
this
Subpart.
c)
No owner
or
operator
of
a
coating
line
complying
by means
of Section
2
18.205
of
this
Subpart
shall
operate
said
coating
line
on or after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of this
Part,
unless
the
owner
or operator
has complied
with,
and
continues
to
comply
with,
Sections
218.205
and
218.211(d)
of
this Subpart.
d)
No
owner
or
operator
of a coating
line complying
by
means
of Section
218.207
of this
Subpart
shall
operate
said
coating
line
on or
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
2 18.106
of
this Part,
unless
the
owner
or
operator
has complied
with,
and
continues
to
comply
with,
Sections
218.207
and
218.211(e)
of
this
Subpart.
e)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a coating
line subject
to
one
or more
of
the
emission limitations
contained
in
Section
218.204
of
this Subpart
on
or
after
March
15,
1996,
choosing
to
comply
by
means
of Section
218.204,
218.205
or 218.207
of
this
Subpart,
shall operate
said
coating
line
on or
after
March
15,
1996,
unless
the
owner
or
operator
complies
with
and
continues
to comply
with,
respectively,
the
applicable
requirements
in
Section
218.204,
or
the alternative
control
options
in Section
218.205
or
218.207
and
the requirements
of Section
218.211.
f)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a coating
line
subject
to
one
or
more
of
the
emission limitations
contained
in
Section
218.204
of
this Subpart
on
or
after
March
15,
1996,
choosing
to
comply
by
means
of
Section
218.212
of
this
Subpart,
shall
operate
said
coating
line
on or
after
March
15,
1996,
unless
the
owner
or
operator
complies
with
and continues
to
comply
with
the
requirements
of Sections
218.212
and
218.213
of
this
Subpart.
g)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a coating
line
subject
to
the
emission
limitations
in Section
218.204(c)(2),
218.204(g)(2),
or
2l8.204(h)(2)
of this
Subpart
shall
operate
said
coating
line on
or
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
218.106(e)
of this
Part,
unless
the
owner
or operator
has complied
with,
and
continues
to
comply
with,
Section
218.204(c)(2),
2l8.204(g)(2), or
218.204(h)(2),
as applicable,
or the
alternative
control
options
in Section
218.205
or
218.207,
and
all applicable
requirements
in
Sections
218.2
11
and
218.218
of this
Subpart.
(Source: Amended
at
_Ill.
Reg.
effective______
Section
218.211
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
a)
The
VOM
content
of
each
coating
and
the
efficiency
of each
capture
system
and
control
device
shall
be determined
by
the
applicable
test
methods
and
procedures
specified
in
Section
2
18.105
of this
Part
to
establish
the
records
required
under
this
Section.
b)
Any
owner
or operator
of
a coating
line
which
is exempted
from
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204
of
this
Subpart
because
of
Section
2
18.208(a)
or
(b) of
this
Subpart
shall
comply
with
the
following:
1)
For sources
exempt
under
Section
2
18.208(a)
of this
Subpart,
by
a
date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of
this Part,
the
owner
or
operator
of a
coating
line
or
a
group
of
coating
lines
referenced
in
subsection(b)
of
this
Section
shall
certify
to the
Agency
that
the
coating
line
or
group
of coating
lines
is
exempt
under
the
provisions
of
Section
218.208(a)
-of
this
Subpart.
Such
certification
shall
include:
A)
A
declaration
that
the
coating
line
or
group
of
coating
lines
is
exempt
from
the
limitations
of
Section 218.204
of
this
Subpart
because
of
Section
218.208(a)
of
this
Subpart; and
B)
Calculations
which
demonstrate
that
the
combined
VOM
emissions
from
the
coating
lines
or
group
of
coating lines
never
exceed
6.8
kg
(15
ibs)
per
day
before
the
application
of
capture
systems
and
control
devices.
The
following
equation
shall
be
used
to
calculate
total
VOM
emissions:
m
fl
where:
Te
=
Total
VOM
emissions
from
coating
lines
each
day
before
the
application
of
capture
systems and
control devices
in
units
of
kg/day
(lbs/day);
m
=
Number
of coating
lines
at
the
source
that
otherwise
would
be
subject
to
the
same
subsection
of
Section
218.104
of
this
Part
(because
they
belong to
the
same
category,
e.g.,
can
coating);
j
=
Subscript
denoting
an
individual coating
line;
n
=
Number
of
different
coatings
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line;
i
=
Subscript
denoting
an individual
coating;
A1
=
Weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
each
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of VOM)
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line
in
units
of
kg
VOM/1
(lbs
VOM/gal);
and
B
1
=
Volume of
each
coating
(minus water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM)
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line
in units
of
1/day
(gal/day).
The
instrument
or
method
by
which
the
owner
or
operator accurately
measured
or
calculated
the
volume
of
each
coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
line
each
day
shall
be
described
in
the
certification
to
the
Agency.
2)
For
sources
exempt
under
Section
218.208(b)
of
this
Subpart,
by
March
15,
1998,
or
upon
initial
start-up,
the
owner
or
operator
of
a
coating
line
or
a group
of
coating
lines
referenced
in
subsection
(b)
of
this
Section
shall
certify
to
the
Agency
that
the
source
is
exempt
under the
provisions
of
Section
2
18.208(b)
of
this
Subpart.
Such
certification
shall
include:
A)
A
declaration
that
the
source
is
exempt
from
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204(1)
of
this
Subpart
because
of
Section
218.208(b)
of
this
Subpart;
and
B)
Calculations
which
demonstrate
that
the
source meets
the
criteria
for
exemption
because
of
Section
218.208(b)
of
this
Subpart.
3)
For
sources
exempt
under
Section
218.208(a)
of
this
Subpart,
on
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of
this
Part,
the
owner
or
operator
of
a coating
line
or
group
of
coating lines
referenced
in
this
subsection
shall
collect
and
record
all
of
the
following
information
each
day
for
each
coating line
and maintain
the
information
at
the
source
for
a period
of
three
years:
A)
The
name
and
identification
number
of
each
coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
line;
and
B)
The
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
and
the
volume
of
each
coating (minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM)
as
applied
each
day
on
each coating
line.
4)
For
sources
exempt
under
Section
218.208(b)
of
this
Subpart,
on
and
after
March
15,
1998,
the
owner
or
operator
of
a
coating
line
or
group
of
coating
lines
referenced
in
this
subsection
(b)
shall
collect
and
record
all
of
the
following
information
for
each
coating
line
and
maintain
the
information
at
the
source
for
a
period
of
three
years:
A)
The
name
and
identification
number
of
each
coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
line;
and
B)
The
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
and
the
volume
of
each
coating (minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
defmition
of
VOM)
as
applied
on
each
coating
line
on a
monthly
basis.
5)
On
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
2 18.106
of this
Part,
the
owner
or
operator
of a coating
line
or group
of
coating
lines
exempted
from
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204
of
this
Subpart
because
of
Section
218.208(a)
of
this
Subpart
shall
notify
the
Agency
of any
record
showing
that
total
VOM
emissions
from
the
coating
line
or
group
of coating
lines
exceed
6.8
kg (15
ibs)
in any
day
before
the
application
of
capture
systems
and
control
devices
by
sending
a copy
of
such
record
to the
Agency
within
30 days
after
the
exceedance
occurs.
6)
On
and
after
March
15,
1998,
any
owner
or
operator
of
a source
exempt
from
the limitations
of
Section
2
18.204(1)
of
this
Subpart
because
of Section 218.208(b)
of
this Subpart
shall
notify
the
Agency
if the
source’s
VOM
emissions
exceed
the
limitations
of
Section
218.208(b)
of this
Subpart
by sending
a copy
of
calculations showing
such
an
exceedance
within
30
days
after
the
change
occurs.
c)
Any
owner
or
operator
of
a coating
line subject
to the
limitations
of
Section
218.204
of
this
Subpart
other
than
Section
2l8.204(a)(2)
or
(a)(3)
of this
Subpart
and
complying
by
means
of
Section
218.204
of
this
Subpart
shall
comply
with
the
following:
1)
By
a
date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of
this
Part,
or
upon
initial
start-up
of
a new
coating
line,
or upon
changing
the
method
of
compliance
from
an
existing
subject
coating
line
from
Section
218.205,
Section
218.207,
Section
218.215,
or
Section
218.216
of
this Subpart
to Section
218.204
of this
Subpart;
the
owner
or
operator
of
a
subject
coating
line
shall
certify
to
the Agency
that
the coating
line
will
be
in compliance
with
Section
218.204
of
this
Subpart
on
and
after
a
date consistent
with
Section
218.106
of this
Part,
or
on
and
after
the
initial
start-up
date.
Such
certification
shall
include:
A)
The
name
and identification
number
of
each coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
line;
B)
The
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of each
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM)
as applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line;-an4
C)
On
and
after
March
15,
1998,
for
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204(l)(2)(A)
or (B)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of
solids
in
each
coating
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
linej
D)
For
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204(c)(2)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of
solids
(or
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of
coatings,
as applicable)
in
each
coating
as applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line;
and
E)
For
coating
lines
subject
to the
limitations
of Section
218.204(g)(2)
or
218.204(h)(2)
of
this
Subpart,
the
application
method(s)
used
to
apply
coatings
on
the
subject
coating
line
and
the
weight
of VOM
per
volume
of each
coating
(or
the
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
solids
in
each
coating,
as
applicable)
as
applied
each
day
on each
coating
line.
2)
On
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of this
Part,
or
on
and
after
the
initial
start-up
date,
the
owner
or
operator
of a
subject
coating line
shall
collect
and
record
all
of
the
following
information
each
day
for
each
coating
line
and
maintain
the
information
at
the
source
for
a
period
of
three
years:
A)
The
name
and
identification
number
of
each
coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
line;
B)
The
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
each
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM)
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line;
C)
On
and
after
March
15,
1998,
for
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204(l)(2)(A)
or (B)
of this
Subpart, the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of solids
in
each
coating
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line
and
certified
product
data
sheets
for
each
coating;
ait4
D)
On
and
after
March
15,
1998,
for
wood
furniture
coating
spray
booths
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204(l)(4)(A)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of VOM
per
weight
of
solids
in
each
strippable
spray
booth
coating
as
applied
each
day
on
each
spray
booth
and
certified
product
data
sheets
for
each
coating
j
L
For
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204(c)(2)
of this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of solids
(or
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of
coatings,
as
applicable)
in
each
coating
as
applied
each
day
on each
coating
line,
and
certified
product
data
sheets
for
each
coating;
and
F)
For
coating
lines
subject
to the
limitations
of
Section
218.204(g)(2) or
218.204(h)(2)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
each
coating
(or
the
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of solids
in
each
coating,
as applicable)
as
applied
each
day
on each
coating
line,
and
certified
product
data
sheets
for
each
coaing
3)
On
and
after
a date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of this
Part,
the
owner
or
operator
of
a subject
coating
line
shall
notify
the
Agency
in
the
following
instances:
A)
Any
record
showing
violation
of
Section
218.204
of this
Subpart
shall
be reported
by
sending
a copy
of
such
record
to the
Agency
within
30
days
following
the
occurance
of
the
violation.
B)
At
least
30 calendar
days
before
changing
the
method
of
compliance
from
Section
2 18.204
of this
Subpart
to Section
218.205
or Section
218.207
of this
Subpart,
the owner
or
operator
shall
comply
with all
requirements
of subsection
(d)(1)
or
(e)(1)
of
this
Section
below,
respectively.
Upon
changing
the
method
of
compliance
from
Section
218.204
of this
Subpart
to
Section
218.205
of
this Subpart
or
Section
218.207
of
this
Subpart,
the
owner
or operator
shall
comply
with
all requirements
of
subsection
(d)
or
(e)
of this
Section,
respectively.
d)
Any
owner
or operator
of a
coating
line
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204
of
this
Subpart
and
complying
by
means
of
Section
218.205
of
this
Subpart
shall
comply
with the
following:
1)
By
a date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of
this
Part,
or
upon
initial
start-up
of
a new
coating
line,
or
upon
changing
the
method
of
compliance
for an
existing
subject
coating
line
from
Section
218.204
or Section
218.207
of
this
Subpart
to
Section
218.205
of
this
Subpart;
the
owner
or operator
of the
subject
coating
line
shall
certify
to
the
Agency
that
the
coating
line
will
be
in compliance
with
Section
218.205
of
this
Subpart
on
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
2
18.106
of
this
Part,
or
on
and
after
the
initial
start-up
date.
Such
certification
shall
include:
A)
The
name
and
identification
number
of
each
coating
line
which
will
comply
by
means
of
Section
218.205
of
this
Subpart.
B)
The
name
and
identification
number
of
each
coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
line.
C)
The
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
and
the
volume
of
each
coating
(minus water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM)
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line.
D)
On
and
after
March
15,
1998,
for
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
21 8.204(l)(2)(A)
or
(B)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of
solids
in
each
coating
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line.
B)
For
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204(c)(2)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of
solids
(or
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of
coatings,
as
applicable)
in
each coating
as
applied
each
day
on
each coating
line.
F)
For
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204(g)(2)
or
218.204(h)(2)
of this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
each
coating (or
the
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
solids
in
each
coating,
as
applicable)
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line.
E)
The
instrument
or
method
by
which
the
owner
or
operator
will
accurately
measure
or
calculate
the
volume
of
each
coating
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line.
)
The
method
by
which
the
owner
or operator
will
create
and
maintain
records
each
day
as
required in
subsection
(d)(2)
of
this
Section.
I@)
An
example
of
the
format
in
which
the
records
required
in
subsection
(d)(2)
of this
Section
will
be
kept.
2)
On
and
after
a date
consistent
with
Section
2
18.106
of
this
Part,
or
on
and
after
the
initial
start-up
date,
the
owner
or
operator
of
a
subject
coating
line
shall
collect
and
record
all
of
the
following
information
each
day
for
each
coating
line
and
maintain
the
information
at the
source
for
a
period
of
three
years:
A)
The
name
and identification
number
of
each
coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
line.
B)
The weight
of
VOM
per
volume and
the volume
of each
coating
(minus
water
and any compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of VOM)
as
applied each
day
on each
coating
line.
C)
On and after
March
15, 1998,
for coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
218.204(l)(2)(A)
or (B) of
this
Subpart, the
weight
of VOM
per
weight of
solids
in
each
coating
as
applied
each
day on
each
coating
line.
D)
For
coating
lines
subject
to the limitations
of
Section
218.204(c)(2)
of
this Subpart,
the
weight
of VOM
per
weight
of
solids
(or
the
weight of
VOM per weight
of
coatings,
as applicable)
in each
coating
as applied
each
day
on
each coating
line.
E)
For
coating lines
subject
to the limitations
of
Section
218.204(g)(2)
or 218.204(h)(2)
of this Subpart,
the weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
each
coating
(or
the weight
of
VOM per
volume of
solids in each
coating,
as applicable)
as
applied each
day
on each coating
line.
FD)
The
daily-weighted
average VOM
content
of all coatings
as
applied
on
each coating
line
as defined
in
Section
218.104
of this Part.
3)
On and
after a date
consistent
with Section
218.106
of this
Part, the
owner
or operator
of
a subject
coating
line
shall notify
the
Agency
in the
following
instances:
A)
Any
record showing
violation
of Section
218.205
of
this
Subpart shall
be
reported
by
sending a
copy
of such
record
to
the Agency
within
30 days
following
the occurrence
of
the violation.
B)
At least 30
calendar days
before
changing
the method
of
compliance
with
this
Subpart
from
Section
2
18.205
of this
Subpart
to
Section 218.204
or Section
218.207
of
this
Subpart,
the
owner
or operator
shall
comply
with
all
requirements
of subsection
(c)(1)
or
(e)(1)
of this
Section,
respectively.
Upon
changing
the method
of compliance
with this subpart
from
Section
218.205
to
Section
218.204
or
Section
218.207
of
this
Subpart,
the
owner
or
operator
shall
comply
with
all
requirements
of
subsection
(c)
or (e)
of
this
Section,
respectively.
e)
Any
owner
or
operator
of
a coating
line
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
218.207
of
this
Subpart
and
complying
by
means
of
Section
218.207(c),
(d),
(e),
(f),
(g)
ef-(h),
or
(1)
of
this
Subpart
shall
comply
with
the
following:
1)
By
a
date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of
this
Part,
or
upon
initial
start-up
of
a
new
coating
line,
or
upon
changing
the
method
of
compliance
for
an
existing
coating
line
from
Section218.204
or
Section
218.205
of
this
Subpart
to Section
218.207
of
this
Subpart,
the
owner
or
operator
of
the
subject
coating
line
shall
perform
all
tests
and
submit
to
the
Agency
the
results
of
all
tests
and
calculations
necessary
to demonstrate
that
the
subject
coating
line
will
be
in
compliance
with
Section
2
18.207
of
this
Subpart
on
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section 218.106
of
this
Part,
or
on and
after
the
initial
start-up
date.
2)
On
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of this
Part,
or
on
and
after
the
initial
start-up
date,
the
owner
or
operator
of a
subject coating
line
shall
collect
and
record
all
of
the
following
information
each
day
for
each
coating
line
and
maintain
the
information
at the
source
for
a
period
of
three
years:
A)
The
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
coating
solids
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line,
if
complying
pursuant
to
Section
218.207(b)(2)
of this
Subpart.
B)
Control
device
monitoring
data.
C)
A log
of
operating
time
for
the
capture
system,
control
device,
monitoring
equipment
and
the
associated
coating
line.
D)
A
maintenance
log
for
the
capture
system,
control
device
and
monitoring
equipment
detailing
all
routine
and
non-routine
maintenance
performed
including
dates
and
duration
of
any
outages.
3)
On
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of this
Part,
the
owner
or
operator
of
a
subject
coating
line
shall
notify
the
Agency
in
the
following
instances:
A)
Any
record
showing
violation
of
Section
218207
of
this
Subpart
shall
be
reported
by sending
a copy
of
such record
to the
Agency
within
30
days following
the occurrence
of
the
violation.
B)
At
least
30 calendar
days
before
changing
the
method
of
compliance
with
this
Subpart
from
Section
218.207
of this
Subpart
to Section
218.204
or Section
218.205
of
this
Subpart,
the owner
or operator
shall
comply
with
all
requirements
of subsection
(c)(1)
or
(d)(1)
of
this Section,
respectively.
Upon
changing
the
method
of compliance
with
this subpart
from
Section
2
18.207
of this
Subpart
to
Section
218.204
or Section
218.205
of
this Subpart,
the
owner
or operator
shall
comply
with
all requirements
of
subsection
(c)
or
(d)
of this
Section,
respectively.
f)
Any owner
or
operator
of a primer
surfacer
operation
or
topcoat
operation
subject
to
the
limitations
of Section
21
8.204(a)(2)
or (a)(3)
of this
Subpart
shall comply
with
the
following:
1)
By
a
date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of
this
Part,
or upon
initial
start-up
of a new
coating
operation,
the owner
or
operator
of
a
subject
coating
operation
shall
certify
to the Agency
that
the
operation
will
be in
compliance
with
Section
2
18.204
of this
Subpart
on
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of
this
Part,
or
on and
after
the initial
start-up
date. Such
certification
shall
include:
A)
The
name
and identification
number
of each
coating
operation
which
will
comply
by
means
of
Section
218.204(a)(2)
and
(a)(3)
of this
Subpart
and
the name
and
identification
number
of each
coating
line in
each coating
operation.
B)
The name
and
identification
number
of
each
coating
as
applied
on each
coating
line
in
the
coating
operation.
C)
The weight
of VOM
per volume
of each
coating
(minus
water
and
any compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the definition
of
VOM)
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line.
D)
The
transfer
efficiency
and
control
efficiency
measured
for
each
coating
line.
E)
Test
reports,
including
raw
data
and
calculations
documenting
the testing
performed
to
measure
transfer
efficiency
and
control
efficiency.
F)
The
instrument
or method
by
which
the
owner
or
operator
will
accurately
measure
or calculate
the
volume
of each
coating
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line.
G)
The
method
by
which
the
owner
or
operator
will
create
and
maintain
records
each
day
as
required
in
subsection
(f)(2)
below.
H)
An
example
format
for
presenting
the
records
required
in
subsection
(f)(2)
below.
2)
On
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of
this
Part,
or
on
and
after
the
initial
start-up
date,
the
owner
or operator
of
a
subject coating
operation
shall
collect
and
record
all
of
the
following
information
each
day
for
each
operation
and
maintain
the
infonnation
at
the
source
for
a period
of
three
years:
A)
All
information
necessary
to
calculate
the
daily-weighted
average
VOM
emissions
from
the
coating
operations
in kg
(lbs)
per
1
(gal)
of
coating
solids
deposited
in accordance
with
the
proposal
submitted,
and
approved
pursuant to
Section
218.204(a)(2)
or
(a)(3)
of
this
Subpart
including:
i)
The
name
and
identification
number
of
each
coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
operation.
ii)
The
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
each
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of VOM)
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
operation.
B)
If
a
control
device(s)
is
used
to
control
VOM emissions,
control
device
monitoring
data;
a log
of operating
time
for
the
capture
system, control
device,
monitoring
equipment
and
the
associated
coating
operation;
and
a
maintenance
log
for
the
capture
system,
control
device
and
monitoring
equipment,
detailing
all
routine
and
non-routine
maintenance
performed
including
dates
and
duration
of
any
outages.
3)
On
and
after
a date
consistent
with
Section
218.106
of
this
Part
or
on
and
after
the
initial
start-up
date,
the
owner
or
operator
of
a
subject
coating
operation
shall
determine
and
record
the
daily
VOM
emissions
in
kg
(ibs)
per
1
(gal)
of
coating
solids
deposited
in
accordance
with the
proposal
submitted
and approved
pursuant
to Section
218.204(a)(2)
or
(a)(3)
of this
Subpart
within
10 days
from
the end
of the
month
and maintain
this information
at the
source
for
a period
of three
years.
4)
On and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
2
18.106
of this
Part,
the
owner
or
operator
of a
subject
coating
operation
shall
notify
the
Agency
in the
following
instances:
A)
Any
record showing
a violation
of
Section
218.204(a)(2)
or
(a)(3)
of this
Subpart
shall
be reported
by
sending
a
copy
of
such
record
to the Agency
within
15 days
from the
end
of
the
month
in
which
the violation
occurred.
B)
The owner
or
operator
shall
notify
the Agency
of
any
change
to the
operation
at
least 30
days
before
the
change
is effected.
The
Agency
shall
determine
whether
or not
compliance
testing
is
required.
If
the
Agency
determines
that
compliance
testing
is required,
then the
owner
or
operator
shall
submit
a testing
proposal
to
the Agency
within
30 days
and
test
within
30
days
of the
approval
of
the proposal
by the
Agency
and
USEPA.
g)
On
and after
a
date consistent
with
Section
218.106(e)
of
this
Part,
or on
and
after
the
initial
start-up
date,
whichever
is later,
the
owner
or operator
of a
coating
line
subject
to
the requirements
of
Section
218.2
18 of
this
Subpart
shall
comply
with
the following:
1)
By
May
1,
2011, or
upon
initial
start-up,
whichever
is
later, submit
a certification
to
the
Agency
that
includes
a
description
of
the
practices
and
procedures
that the
source
will
follow
to
ensure
compliance
with
the
applicable
requirements
in
Section
218.218
of
this
Subpart
2)
Notify
the Agency
of any
violation
of Section
218.218
of this
Subpart
by
providing
a description
of the
violation
and
copies
of
records
documenting
such
violation
to the
Agency
within
30
days
following
the
occurrence
of
the violation;
and
3)
Maintain
at the source
all
records
required
by
this subsection
(g)
for
a minimum
of
three years
from the
date
the
document
was
created
and
make
such
records
available
to
the
Agency
upon
request.
(Source:
Amended
at
_Ill.
Reg.
effective______
Section
218.212
Cross-Line
Averaging
to
Establish
Compliance
for
Coating
Lines
a)
On
and
after
March
15,
1996,
any
owner
or
operator
of
a
coating
line
subject
to
the
limitations
set
forth
in
Section
218.204
of
this
Subpart,
except
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
in
Section
218
.204(c)(2),
(g)(2),
or
(h)(2)
of
this
Subpart,
and
with
coating
lines
in
operation
prior
to
January
1,
1991
(“pre-existing
coating
lines”),
may,
for
pre-existing
coating
lines
only,
elect
to
comply
with
the
requirements
of
this
Section,
rather
than
complying
with
the
applicable
emission
limitations
set
forth
in
Section
2
18.204,
if
an
operational
change
of
the
type
described
below
has
been
made
after
January
1,
1991,
to
one
or
more
pre-existing
coating
lines
at
the
source.
An
operational
change
occurs
when
a
pre-existing
coating
line
is
replaced
with
a
line
using
lower
VOM
coating
for
the
same
purpose
as
the
replaced
line
(“replacement
line”).
A
source
electing
to
rely
on
this
Section
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the
requirements
of
this
Subpart
shall
operate
pursuant
to
federally
enforceable
permit
conditions
approved
by
the
Agency
and
USEPA.
b)
An
owner
or
operator
of
pre-existing
coating
lines
subject
to
a
VOM
content
limitation
in
Section
218.204
of
this
Subpart
and
electing
to
rely
on
this
Section
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
this
Subpart
must
establish,
by
use
of
the
equations
in
subsection
(d)
of
this
Section,
that
the
calculated
actual
daily
VOM
emissions
from
all
participating
coating
lines,
as
defined
below,
are
less
than
the
calculated
daily
allowable
VOM
emissions
from
the
same
group
of
coating
lines.
For
any
pre-existing
coating
line
to
be
aggregated
for
the
purposes
of
Section
218.212,
218.213,
or
218.214
of
this
Subpart
(“participating
coating
lines”),
the
source
must
establish
that:
1)
All
coatings
applied
on
the
participating
coating
line
shall,
at
all
times,
have
a
VOM
content
less
than
or
equal
to
the
applicable
VOM
content
limitation
for
such
coating
listed
in
Appendix
H
of
this
Part;
and
2)
On
the
date
the
source
elects
to
rely
on
this
Section
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
this
Subpart,
all
coatings
applied
on
the
participating
coating
line
are
not
already
in
compliance
with
the
VOM
content
limitation
for
such
coating
effective
on
or
after
March
15,
1996;
or
the
participating
coating
line
is
a
replacement
line,
as
defmed
in
subsection
(a)
of
this
Section
with
an
operational
change
occurring
on
or
after
January
1,
1991.
c)
Notwithstanding
subsection
(a)
of
this
Section,
any
owner
or
operator
of
a
coating
line
subject
to
the
limitations
set
forth
in
Section
218.204
of
this
Subpart
and
electing
to
rely
on
this
Section
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
this
Subpart,
may
also
include
as
a participating
coating
line,
until
December
31, 1999,
only,
any replacement
line
that
satisfies
all
of the
following
conditions:
1)
The
replacement
line
is
operated
as
a
powder
coating
line;
2)
The replacement
line
was
added
after
July
1, 1988;
and
3)
The owner
or
operator
also
includes
as a
participating
coating
line
one
or more
coating
lines
that
satisfy
the
criteria
of
a replacement
line,
as
described
in
subsection
(a)
of
this
Section.
d)
To
demonstrate
compliance
with
this
Section,
a
source
shall
establish
the
following:
1)
An
alternative
daily
emission
limitation
shall
be
determined
for
all
participating
coating
lines
at the
source
according
to
subsection
(d)(2)
of this
Section.
All
participating
coating
lines
shall
be
factored
in
each
day to
demonstrate
compliance.
Provided
compliance
is
established
pursuant
to
the
requirements
in
this
subsection,
nothing
in this
Section
requires
daily
operation
of
each
participating
line.
Actual
daily
emissions
from
all
participating
coating
lines
(Ed)
shall
never
exceed
the
alternative
daily
emission
limitation
(Ad)
and
shall
be
calculated
by
use
of the
following
equation:
n
Ed=ZV
1
C
1
i
1
where:
Ed
=
Actual
daily
VOM
emissions
from
participating
coating
lines
in
units
of
kg/day
(lbs/day);
i
=
Subscript
denoting
a
specific
coating
applied;
n
=
Total
number
of
coatings
applied
by
all
participating
coating
lines
at
the
source;
V
=
Volume
of each
coating
applied
for
the
day
in
units
of
1/day
(gal/day)
of coating
3(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM);
and
C
1
The
VOM
content
of
each
coating
as
applied
in
units
of
kg
VOM/l
(lbs
VOM/gal)
of
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM).
2)
The
alternative
daily
emission
limitation
(Ad)
shall
be
determined
for
all
participating
coating
lines
at
the
source
on
a
daily
basis
as
follows:
Ad
=
A
1
+
A
where
Ad
and
A
are
defined
in
subsections
(2)(A)
and
(2)(B)
of
this
Section.
A)
The
portion
of
the
alternative
daily
emissions
limitation
for
coating
operations
at
a
source
using
non-powder
coating
(A
1
)
shall
be
determined
for
all
such
participating
non-
powder
coating
lines
on
a
daily
basis
as
follows:
n
A
1
=
V
L
-C
i=l
(D-Li)
where:
A
1
The
VOM
emissions
allowed
for
the
day
in
units
of
kg/day
(lbs/day);
i
=
Subscript
denoting
a
specific
coating
applied;
n
=
Total
number
of
coatings
applied
in
the
participating
coating
lines;
C
1
=
The
VOM
content
of
each
coating
as
applied
in
units
of
kg
VOM/l
(lbs
VOM/gal)
of
coating
(minus
water
and
any compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM);
=
The density
of
VOM
in
each
coating
applied.
For
the
purposes
of
calculating
A
1
,
the density
is 0.8
82
kg
VOM/l
VOM
(7.36
lbs
VOM/gal
VOM);
V
1
=
Volume
of
each
coating
applied
for
the
day
in
units
of
1
(gal)
of
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM);
and
L =
The
VOM
emission
limitation
for each
coating
applied,
as
specified
in
Section
218.204
of this
Subpart,
in
units
of kg
VOM!l
(lbs
VOM/gal)
of
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the definition
of
VOM).
B)
The
portion
of
the alternative
daily
emission
limitation
for
coating
operations
at
a
source
using
powdered
coating
(Ar)
shall
be
determined
for all
such
participating
powder
coating
lines
at
the
source
on
a
daily
basis
as
follows:
mn
A =
Z
Yiijih
h=lj=1
(D-L
3
)
where:
A
=
The
VOM
emissions
allowed
for
the
day in
units
of
kg/day
(lbs/day);
h
Subscript
denoting
a specific
powder
coating
line;
j
=
Subscript
denoting
a specific
powder
coating
applied;
m =
Total
number
of
participating
powder
coating
lines;
n
=
Total
number
of
powder
coatings
applied
in the
participating
coating
lines;
=
The
assumed
density
of
VOM
in liquid
coating,
0.882
kg
VOM/l
VOM
(7.36
lbs VOM/gal
VOM);
V
=
Volume
of
each
powder
coating
consumed
for
the
day
in units
of
1 (gal)
of
coating;
and
L
=
The
VOM
emission
limitation
for
each
coating
applied,
as specified
in
Section
218.204
of
this
Subpart,
in
units
of kg
VOM/l
(lbs
VOM/gal)
of
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically exempted
from
the definition
of
VOM);
and
K
=
A
constant
for each
individual
coating
line
representing
the
ratio
of
the
volume
of coating
solids
consumed
on the
liquid
coating
system
which
has been
replaced
to the
volume
of powder
coating
consumed
on
the
replacement
line
to
accomplish
the
same
coating
job.
This
value
shall
be
determined
by
the
source
based
on tests
conducted
and
records
maintained
pursuant
to the
requirements
of Section
218.213
of
this
Subpart
demonstrating
the
amount
of coating
solids
consumed
as
both
liquid
and
powder.
Test
methods
and
recordkeeping
requirements
shall
be approved
by the
Agency
and
USEPA
and
shall
be
contained
in
the
source’s
operating
permit
as
federally
enforceable
permit
conditions,
subject
to the
following
restrictions:
i)
K cannot
exceed
0.9
for
non-recycled
powder
coating
systems;
or
ii)
K cannot
exceed
2.0 for
recycled
powder
coating
systems.
(Source:
Amended
at
Ill.
Reg.
effective______
Section
218.218
Work
Practice
Standards
for Paper
Coatings,
Metal
Furniture
Coatings,
and
Large
Appliance
Coatings
a)
On
and
after
May
1,
2011,
every
owner
or operator
of
a
source
subjct
to
the
requirements
of Section
218.204(c)
of
this
Subpart
shall:
1)
Store
all
VOM-containing
cleaning
materials
in closed
containers;
2)
Ensure
that
mixing
and
storage
containers
used
for
VOM
containing materials
are
kept
closed
at all
times
except
when
depositing
or
removing
such
materials;
3)
Minimize
spills
of
VOM-containing
cleaning
materials;
4)
Convey
VOM-containing
cleaning
materials
from
one
location
to
another
in
closed
containers
or pipes;
and
Minimize
VOM
emissions
from
the
n1iuirnr
of storage.
mixing.
and
conveying equipment.
b)
On
and
after
May
1,
2011,
every
owner
or
operator
of a source
subject
to
the requirements
of
Section
218.204(g)
or 2 18.204(h)
of this
Subpart
shall:
5)
1)
Store
all VOM-containing
coatings,
thinners,
coating-related
waste
materials,
cleaning
materials,
and used
shop
towels
in
closed
containers;
2)
Ensure
that
mixing
and
storage
containers
used
for
VOM
containing
coatings,
thinners,
coating-related
waste
materials,
and
cleaning
materials
are
kept
closed
at all
times
except
when
depositing
or
removing
such
materials;
3)
Minimize
spills
of VOM-containing
coatings,
thinners,
coating-
related
waste
materials,
and
cleaning
materials,
and
clean
up
spills
immediately:
4)
Convey
VOM-containing
coatings,
thinners,
coating-related
waste
materials,
and cleaning
materials
from
one
location
to
another
in
closed
containers
or
pipes;
and
5)
Minimize
VOM
emissions
from
the cleaning
of
storage,
mixing,
and
conveying
equipment.
(Source:
Added
at _lll.
Reg.
effective______
TITLE
35: ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
SUBTITLE
B:
AIR
POLLUTION
CHAPTER
I: POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
SUBCHAPTER
C: EMISSIONS
STANDARDS
AND
LIMITATIONS
FOR STATIONARY
SOURCES
PART
219
ORGANIC
MATERIAL
EMISSION
STANDARDS
AND
LIMITATIONS
FOR
THE
METRO
EAST AREA
SUBPART
A:
GENERAL
PROVISIONS
Section
219.100
Introduction
219.101
Savings
Clause
219.102
Abbreviations
and Conversion
Factors
219.103
Applicability
219.104
Definitions
219.105
Test
Methods
and Procedures
219.106
Compliance
Dates
219.107
Operation
of Afterburners
219.108
Exemptions,
Variations,
and
Alternative
Means
of Control
or
Compliance
Determinations
219.109
Vapor
Pressure
of Volatile
Organic
Liquids
219.110
Vapor
Pressure
of Organic
Material
or
Solvent
219.111
Vapor
Pressure
of Volatile
Organic
Material
219.112
Incorporations
by Reference
219.113
Monitoring
for Negligibly-Reactive
Compounds
SUBPART
B:
ORGANIC
EMISSIONS
FROM
STORAGE
A1D
LOADING
OPERATIONS
Section
219.119
Applicability
for
VOL
219.120
Control Requirements
for
Storage
Containers
of VOL
219.121
Storage
Containers
of VPL
219.122
Loading
Operations
219.123
Petroleum
Liquid
Storage
Tanks
219.124
External
Floating
Roofs
219.125
Compliance
Dates
219.126
Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
219.127
Testing
VOL
Operations
219.128
Monitoring
VOL Operations
219.129
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
for VOL
Operations
SUBPART
C:
ORGANIC
EMISSIONS
FROM
MISCELLANEOUS
EQUIPMENT
Section
219.141
Separation Operations
219.142
Pumps
and
Compressors
219.143
Vapor
Blowdown
219.144
Safety
Relief
Valves
SUBPART
E: SOLVENT
CLEANING
Section
219.181
Solvent
Cleaning
in
General
219.182
Cold
Cleaning
219.183
Open
Top
Vapor
Degreasing
219.184
Conveyorized
Degreasing
219.185
Compliance
Schedule
(Repealed)
219.186
Test
Methods
SUBPART
F:
COATING
OPERATIONS
Section
2 19.204
Emission
Limitations
219.205
Daily-Weighted Average
Limitations
219.206
Solids
Basis
Calculation
2
19.207
Alternative
Emission
Limitations
2
19.208
Exemptions
From
Emission
Limitations
2 19.209
Exemption
From
General
Rule
on
Use of
Organic
Material
219.210
Compliance
Schedule
219.211
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
2 19.212
Cross-Line
Averaging
to Establish
Compliance
for Coating
Lines
2 19.213
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
for Cross-Line
Averaging
Participating
Coating
Lines
219.214
Changing
Compliance
Methods
2 19.215
Wood
Furniture
Coating
Averaging
Approach
2
19.216
Wood
Furniture
Coating
Add-On
Control
Use
219.217
Wood
Furniture
Coating
Work
Practice
Standards
219.218
Work Practice
Standards
for
Paper
Coatings,
Metal
Furniture
Coatings,
and Large
Appliance
Coatings
SUBPART
G: USE
OF
ORGANIC
MATERIAL
Section
219.301
Use
of Organic
Material
219.302
Alternative
Standard
219.303
Fuel
Combustion
Emission
Units
2 19.304
Operations
with
Compliance
Program
SUBPART
H:
PRINTING
AND
PUBLISHING
Section
219.401
Flexographic
and Rotogravure
Printing
219.402
Applicability
2 19.403
Compliance
Schedule
2
19.404
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
219.405
Lithographic
Printing:
Applicability
2 19.406
Provisions
Applying
to
Heatset
Web Offset
Lithographic
Printing
Prior
to
March
15, 1996
2 19.407
Emission
Limitations
and Control
Requirements
for Lithographic
Printing
Lines
On and After
March
15, 1996
219.408
Compliance
Schedule
for
Lithographic
Printing
On
and After March
15,
1996
219.409
Testing
for Lithographic
Printing
On and
After March
15,
1996
219.410
Monitoring
Requirements
for
Lithographic
Printing
219.411
Recordkeeping
and Reporting
for
Lithographic
Printing
SUBPART
Q:
SYNTHETIC
ORGANIC
CHEMICAL
AND
POLYMER
MANUFACTURING
PLANT
Section
2 19.421
General
Requirements
219.422
Inspection
Program
Plan
for
Leaks
219.423
Inspection
Program
for
Leaks
2 19.424
Repairing
Leaks
2 19.425
Recordkeeping
for
Leaks
219.426
Report
for Leaks
2 19.427
Alternative
Program
for
Leaks
219.428
Open-Ended
Valves
219.429
Standards
for
Control
Devices
219.430
Compliance
Date (Repealed)
219.431
Applicability
2
19.432
Control
Requirements
2
19.433
Performance
and
Testing Requirements
2
19.434
Monitoring
Requirements
2
19.435
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
Requirements
2
19.436
Compliance
Date
SUBPART
R:
PETROLEUM
REFINING
AND RELATED
INDUSTRIES;
ASPHALT
MATERIALS
Section
219.441
Petroleum
Refinery
Waste Gas
Disposal
219.442
Vacuum Producing
Systems
219.443
Wastewater
(Oil/Water)
Separator
2
19.444
Process
Unit Turnarounds
219.445
Leaks:
General
Requirements
219.446
Monitoring
Program
Plan
for Leaks
2
19.447
Monitoring
Program
for Leaks
219.448
Recordkeeping
for
Leaks
.219.449
Reporting for Leaks
219.450
Alternative Program
for
Leaks
219.451
Sealing
Device Requirements
219.452
Compliance
Schedule for
Leaks
219.453
Compliance
Dates (Repealed)
SUBPART S:
RUBBER
AND
MISCELLANEOUS
PLASTIC
PRODUCTS
Section
219.46 1
Manufacture of
Pneumatic Rubber
Tires
2 19.462
Green Tire Spraying
Operations
2 19.463
Alternative Emission
Reduction
Systems
219.464
Emission Testing
219.465
Compliance
Dates (Repealed)
219.466
Compliance
Plan (Repealed)
SUBPART T: PHARMACEUTICAL
MANUFACTURING
Section
219.480
Applicability
219.481
Control of Reactors,
Distillation
Units,
Crystallizers,
Centrifuges
and
Vacuum Dryers
2 19.482
Control of
Air Dryers,
Production
Equipment
Exhaust
Systems
and
Filters
2
19.483
Material Storage
and Transfer
219.484
In-Process
Tanks
219.485
Leaks
219.486
Other
Emission
Units
219.487
Testing
2 19.488
Monitoring
for Air Pollution
Control Equipment
219.489
Recordkeeping
for
Air
Pollution
Control
Equipment
SUBPART
V: BATCH OPERATIONS
AND
AIR
OXIDATION
PROCESSES
Section
219.500
Applicability
for Batch Operations
219.50
1
Control
Requirements for
Batch Operations
2
19.502
Determination
of Uncontrolled
Total
Annual Mass
Emissions
and Actual
Weighted
Average
Flow
Rate Values
for Batch
Operations
2 19.503
Performance and Testing
Requirements
for Batch
Operations
2
19.504
Monitoring Requirements
for Batch
Operations
2 19.505
Reporting and Recordkeeping
for
Batch
Operations
219.506
Compliance Date
219.520
Emission Limitations
for Air
Oxidation
Processes
219.521
Definitions (Repealed)
219.522
Savings
Clause
219.523
Compliance
2
19.524
Determination
of
Applicability
2 19.525
Emission
Limitations
for
Air
Oxidation
Processes
(Renumbered)
219.526
Testing
and
Monitoring
219.527
Compliance
Date
(Repealed)
SUBPART
W:
AGRICULTURE
Section
219.541
Pesticide
Exception
SUBPART
X:
CONSTRUCTION
Section
219.561
Architectural
Coatings
219.562
Paving
Operations
219.563
Cutback
Asphalt
SUBPART
Y: GASOLINE
DISTRIBUTION
Section
219.581
Bulk
Gasoline
Plants
219.582
Bulk
Gasoline
Terminals
2 19.583
Gasoline
Dispensing
Operations
-
Storage
Tank
Filling
Operations
219.584
Gasoline
Delivery
Vessels
219.585
Gasoline Volatility
Standards
219.586
Gasoline
Dispensing Operations
-
Motor
Vehicle
Fueling
Operations
(Repealed)
SUBPART Z:
DRY
CLEANERS
Section
219.601
Perchioroethylene
Dry
Cleaners
(Repealed)
2 19.602
Exemptions
(Repealed)
219.603
Leaks
(Repealed)
219.604
Compliance
Dates
(Repealed)
219.605
Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
219.606
Exception
to
Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
219.607
Standards
for
Petroleum
Solvent
Dry
Cleaners
219.608
Operating
Practices
for
Petroleum
Solvent
Dry
Cleaners
219.609
Program
for Inspection
and
Repair
of Leaks
219.610
Testing
and
Monitoring
219.611
Exemption
for
Petroleum
Solvent
Dry
Cleaners
219.612
Compliance Dates
(Repealed)
219.613
Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
SUBPART
AA:
PAINT
AND
INK
MANUFACTURING
Section
219.620
Applicability
219.621
Exemption
for Waterbase Material
and
Heatset-Offset
Ink
2 19.623
Permit Conditions
219.624
Open-Top
Mills,
Tanks,
Vats
or Vessels
219.625
Grinding Mills
219.626
Storage Tanks
219.628
Leaks
219.630
Clean Up
219.636
Compliance Schedule
2 19.637
Recordkeeping and Reporting
SUBPART BB:
POLYSTYRENE
PLANTS
Section
219.640
Applicability
2 19.642
Emissions Limitation at
Polystyrene
Plants
2 19.644
Emissions Testing
SUBPART
FF: BAKERY
OVENS
Section
2
19.720
Applicability (Repealed)
2 19.722
Control Requirements (Repealed)
219.726
Testing (Repealed)
2 19.727
Monitoring (Repealed)
2
19.728
Recordkeeping and
Reporting
(Repealed)
2 19.729
Compliance Date (Repealed)
219.730
Certification (Repealed)
SUBPART GG:
MARINE
TERMINALS
Section
219.760
Applicability
2 19.762
Control Requirements
2
19.764
Compliance Certification
219.766
Leaks
2 19.768
Testing and Monitoring
2 19.770
Recordkeeping and Reporting
SUBPART
HH: MOTOR VEHICLE
REFINISHING
Section
219.780
Emission Limitations
2
19.782
Alternative Control Requirements
2
19.784
Equipment Specifications
219.786
Surface Preparation
Materials
219.787
Work Practices
219.788
Testing
2 19.789
Monitoring and Recordkeeping
for
Control
Devices
2
19.790
General
Recordkeeping and
Reporting
(Repealed)
219.791
Compliance
Date
219.792
Registration
2 19.875
Applicability
of
Subpart
BB
(Renumbered)
219.877
Emissions
Limitation
at
Polystyrene
Plants
(Renumbered)
219.879
Compliance
Date
(Repealed)
219.881
Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
2
19.883
Special
Requirements
for
Compliance
Plan
(Repealed)
219.886
Emissions
Testing
(Renumbered)
SUBPART
PP:
MISCELLANEOUS
FABRICATED
PRODUCT
MANUFACTURING
PROCESSES
Section
219.920
Applicability
219.923
Permit
Conditions
2
19.926
Control
Requirements
219.927
Compliance
Schedule
219.928
Testing
SUBPART
QQ:
MISCELLANEOUS
FORMULATION
MANUFACTURING
PROCESSES
Section
219.940
Applicability
2
19.943
Permit
Conditions
2 19.946
Control Requirements
2 19.947
Compliance
Schedule
219.948
Testing
SUBPART
RR:
MISCELLANEOUS
ORGANIC
CHEMICAL
MANUFACTURING
PROCESSES
Section
219.960
Applicability
219.963
Permit
Conditions
2
19.966
Control
Requirements
2
19.967
Compliance
Schedule
219.968
Testing
SUBPART
TT:
OTHER
EMISSION
UNITS
Section
219.980
Applicability
219.983
Permit
Conditions
2 19.986
Control
Requirements
219.987
Compliance
Schedule
219.988
Testing
SUBPART
UU:
RECORDKEEPING
AND
REPORTING
Section
219.990
Exempt
Emission Units
219.991
Subject
Emission Units
219.APPENDIX
A:
List of
Chemicals
Defining Synthetic
Organic
Chemical and
Polymer
Manufacturing
219.APPENDIX
B: VOM Measurement
Techniques
for Capture
Efficiency
(Repealed)
219.APPENDIX
C:
Reference
Methods and
Procedures
219
.APPENDIX
D: Coefficients
for
the Total
Resource
Effectiveness Index
(TRE)
Equation
219.APPENDIX
E:
List of
Affected
Marine
Terminals
219.APPENDIX
G: TRE Index
Measurements
for
SOCMI
Reactors
and Distillation
Units
219.APPENDIX
H: Baseline
VOM Content Limitations
for
Subpart F, Section
219.212
Cross-Line Averaging
AUTHORITY:
Implementing Section
10
and
authorized
by
Sections 27, 28 and
28.5
of the
Environmental
Protection Act
[415 ILCS
5/10, 27,
28
and 28.5].
SOURCE:
Adopted
in
R91-8
at 15 Ill. Reg.
12491, effective
August
16, 1991;
amended
in
R91-24 at
16 Iii. Reg.
13597,
effective August
24, 1992; amended
in R91-
30 at 16
Ill. Reg. 13883,
effective August
24, 1992;
emergency
amendment
in R93-12
at 17 Ill. Reg.
8295,
effective
May 24, 1993,
for
a maximum
of 150
days, amended
in
R93-9 at 17 Iii.
Reg.
16918,
effective September
27, 1993
and
October
21, 1993;
amended in
R93-28 at
18 Ill. Reg. 4242, effective
March
3,
1994; amended
in R94-12
at 18 Iii. Reg.
14987,
effective September
21,
1994; amended
in R94-15
at
18 Ill.
Reg.
16415,
effective
October
25, 1994;
amended
in R94-16
at
18 Ill. Reg.
16980, effective
November 15,
1994;
emergency
amendment
in
R95-10
at
19 Iii. Reg.
3059, effective
February 28,
1995,
for
a maximum of 150
days;
amended
in
R94-21,
R94-31 and
R94-
32 at 19 Ill.
Reg. 6958,
effective May
9,
1995;
amended
in R94-33
at 19 Ill. Reg.
7385,
effective
May 22, 1995;
amended
in R96-2 at 20
111. Reg. 3848,
effective
February 15,
1996; amended in R96-13
at 20 Iii. Reg.
14462,
effective
October
28,
1996;
amended
in R97-24 at 21111.
Reg.
7721,
effective
June
9,
1997;
amended
in
R97-31
at
22
Ill. Reg. 3517,
effective
February 2, 1998;
amended in
R04-12/20
at 30
Ill. Reg.
9799,
effective May 15, 2006;
amended
in
R06-21 at 31111.
Reg. 7110,
effective
April
30, 2007.
SUBPART
A: GENERAL
PROVISIONS
Section
219.106
Compliance
Dates
a)
Except as provided in
subsection
(b)
below,
compliance
with
the
requirements
of this Part
is required
by
May
15, 1992,
consistent
with the
provisions of Section
219.103
of this Part.
b)
As
this
Part
is
amended
from
time
to
time,
compliance
dates
included
in
the
specific
Subparts
supersede
the
requirements
of
this
Section
except
as
limited
by
Section
219.101(b)
of
this
Subpart.
c)
Any
owner
or operator
of
a source
subject
to
the
requirements
of
Section
219.204(c)(2),
219.204(g)(2),
or 219.204(h)(2)
of
this
Part
shall
comply
with
the
applicable
requirements
in
such
Section(s),
as well
as
all
applicable
requirements
in Sections
219.205
through
219.214
and
219.218,
byMay
1,2011.
(Source:
Amended
at
_Ill.
Reg.
effective______
S{JBPART
F:
COATING
OPERATIONS
Section
2
19.204
Emission
Limitations
Except
as
provided
in
Sections
219.205,
219.207,
219.208,
219.212,
219.215
and
219.216
of
this
Subpart,
no owner
or
operator
of a coating
line
shall
apply
at
any
time
any
coating
in
which
the
VOM
content
exceeds
the
following
emission
limitations
for
the
specified
coating. Except
as otherwise
provided
in Sections
219.204(c),
219.204(g),
2
19.204(h),
and
219.204(1),
compliance
with
the
emission
limitations
marked
with
an
asterisk
in
this
Section
is required
on
and
after
March
15,
1996,
and
compliance
with
emission
limitations
not
marked
with
an asterisk
is
required
until
March
15,
1996.
The
following emission
limitations
are expressed
in
units
of
VOM
per
volume
of
coating
(minus
water
and any
compounds
which
are specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM)
as applied
at each
coating
applicator,
except
where
noted.
Compounds
which
are
specifically exempted
from
the
definition
of VOM
should
be
treated
as water
for
the
purpose
of
calculating the
“less
water”
part
of
the
coating
composition.
Compliance
with
this
Subpart
must
be
demonstrated
through
the
applicable
coating
analysis
test
methods
and
procedures
specified
in Section
219.105(a)
of
this
Part
and the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements specified
in Section
219.211(c)
of this
Subpart
except
where
noted.
(Note:
The
equation
presented
in
Section
2 19.206
of this
Part
shall
be
used
to
calculate
emission limitations
for
determining
compliance
by
add-on
controls,
credits
for
transfer
efficiency, emissions
trades
and
cross-line
averaging.)
The
emission
limitations
are as
follows:
a)
Automobile
or Light-Duty
Truck
Coating
kg/i
lb/gal
1)
Prime
coat
0.14
(1.2)
0.14*
(1.2)*
2)
Primer
surface
coat
1.81
(15.1)
1.81*
(15.1)*
(Note:
The
primer
surface
coat
limitation
is in
units
of kg
(lbs)
of
VOM
per
1 (gal)
of coating
solids
deposited.
Compliance with
the
limitation
shall
be
based
on
the daily-weighted
average
from
an
entire
primer
surface
operation.
Compliance
shall
be
demonstrated
in accordance
with
the topcoat
protocol
referenced
in
Section
219.105(b)
and
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
specified
in
Section
219.211(f).
Testing
to demonstrate
compliance
shall
be performed
in
accordance
with
the topcoat
protocol
and
a
detailed
testing
proposal
approved
by
the
Agency
and USEPA
specifying
the method
of demonstrating
compliance
with
the
protocol.
Section
2 19.205
does
not
apply
to the
primer
surface
limitation.)
kg/i
lb/gal
3)
Topcoat
1.81
(15.1)
1.81*
(15.1)*
(Note:
The
topcoat
limitation
is
in units
of
kg
(ibs)
of VOM
per
1
(gal)
of
coating
solids
deposited.
Compliance
with
the limitation
shall
be
based
on
the
daily-weighted
average
from
an entire
topcoat
operation.
Compliance
shall
be demonstrated
in
accordance
with
the topcoat
protocol
referenced
in
Section
2
19.105(b)
of this
Part
and
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
specified
in
Section
219.211(f).
Testing
to
demonstrate
compliance
shall
be
performed
in accordance
with
the
topcoat
protocol
and
a
detailed
testing
proposal
approved
by
the
Agency
and USEPA
specifying
the
method
of demonstrating
compliance
with
the
protocol.
Section
2
19.205
of this
Part does
not apply
to
the
topcoat
limitation.)
kg/i
lb/gal
4)
Final
repair
coat
0.58
(4.8)
0.58*
(4.8)*
b)
Can Coating
kg/l
lb/gal
1)
Sheet
basecoat
and overvamish
A)
Sheet
basecoat
0.34
(2.8)
0.26*
(2.2)*
B)
Overvarnish
0.34
(2.8)
0.34
(2.8)*
2)
Exterior
basecoat
and
overvarnish
0.34
(2.8)
0.25*
(2.1)*
3)
Interior
body
spray
coat
A)
Two piece
0.51
(4.2)
0.44*
(37)*
B)
Three
piece
0.51
(4.2)
0.51*
(4.2)*
4)
Exterior
end
coat
0.51
(4.2)
0.51*
(4.2)*
5)
Side
seam
spray
coat
0.66
(5.5)
0.66*
(5.5)*
6)
End
sealing
compound
coat
0.44
(3.7)
0.44*
(37)*
kg,’l
lb/gal
c)
Paper
Coating
0.35
(2.9)
0.28*
(2.3)*
1)
Prior
to
May
1,2011:
ic1i
lb/gal
(2.3)
2)
On
and
after
May
1, 2011:
kg
VOM/kg
kg
VOM/kg
(lb
VOM/ib)
(lb
VOM/ib)
solids
applied
coatings
applied
A)
Pressure
sensitive
tape
and
label
surface
coatings
0.20
(0.067)
B)
All
other
paper
coatings
4Q
(0.08)
(Note:
The
paper
coating limitation
shall
not
apply
to
any
owner
or
operator
of
any
paper
coating
line
on
which
flexographic
or
rotogravure
printing is
performed
if
the
paper
coating
line
complies
with
the
emissions
limitations
in
Section
2
19.401
of
this
Part.
In
addition,
screen
printing
on
paper
is
not
regulated
as
paper
coating,
but
is
regulated
under
Subpart
TT
of this
Part.
On
and
after
May
1.
2011,
the
paper
coating
limitation
shall
also
not
apply
to coating
performed
on
or
in-line
with
any
digital
printing
press,
or
to
size
presses
and
on-machine
coaters
on
papermaking
machines
applying
sizing
or
water-based
clays.)
kg/i
lb/gal
d)
Coil
Coating
0.31
(2.6)
p
C)
C)
I
19
I
C
C)
F
L.
0
p
I-t
I
I
L
CD
CD
I
C)-
I
I
10
CD
CD
CD
i-
I
CD
Ip)
0
I
L
L
I
I
-
‘
I
p
tJ
(P2
lCD
lCD
l
I
‘
‘
Ic
CD
CD
I
CD
rI
CD
l
I.
I-
I
lCD
C)
lCD
I
i
IQ-.
C)
0
0
0
E
(I)
CD
0
0
CD
CD
IC
IC
I
c
c
tz:319
l9
tl
lJ
IL
00
I
4
IC
IC
C
C
C
Ut
*
*
*
IDIC
jC
I3
ti3J
*
*
*
f—,
I—
‘—
‘—f
‘—i
‘.-
‘-
P
I
I
I
E
Heat
Resistant
(Note:
On arid
after May
1,
2011,
these
limitations
shall
not apply
to
stencil coatings,
safety-indicating
coatings,
solid-film
lubricants,
electric-insulating
and thermal-conducting
coatings,
touch-up
and
repair
coatings,
or
coating
applications
utilizing
hand-held
aerosol
cans.)
3)
On
and
after May
1,
2011,
an owner
or
operator
of
a
coating line
subject
to the limitations
in
subsection
(g)
of
this Section
shall
apply
all coatings
using
one or more
of the
following
application
methods:
A)
Electrostatic
spray;
B)
High volume
low
pressure
(HVLP)
spray;
Flow
coating.
For the
purposes
of this
subsection
(g),
flow
coating
means
a
non-atomized
technique
of
applying
i)
Air
Dried
ii)
Baked
F)
Metallic
G)
Pretreatment
Coatings
Ffl
Solar Absorbent
i)
Air
Dried
0.420
(3.5)
0.360
0.420
0.420
(3.5)
0.420
0.360
(3.0)
046
p34*
046
0.23*
0.80
(6.7)
0.61
(5.1)
0.80
(6.7)
0.80
(6.7)
0.80
(6.7)
0.61
(5.1)
(3.0)
(2.8)
*
(3.0)
(2.3)*
ii)
Baked
A ..
4+
2)
Baked
C)
coating
to
a substrate
with
a fluid
nozzle
with
no air
supplied
to
the
nozzle;
D)
Roll
coating;
E)
Dip
coating,
including
electrodeposition.
For
purposes
of
this
subsection (g),
electrodeposition
means
a
water-borne
dip coating
process
in
which
opposite electrical
charges
are
applied
to
the substrate
and
the
coating.
The
coating
is
attracted
to
the
substrate
due to
the
electrochemical
potential
difference
that is
created;
or
F)
Another
coating
application
method
capable
of
achieving
a
transfer
efficiency
equal
to
or
better
than
that
achieved
by
HVLP
spraying,
if
such
method
is
approved
in
writing
by
the
Agency.
0.275
0.40
(3.3)
0.340
0.55
(2.8)
(4.5)
0.275
40
(2.3)
(3.3)
0.340
0.55
(4.5)
h)
Large
Appliance
Coating
1)
PriortoMayl,2011:
A)
Air
dried
B)
Baked
2)
On
and
after
May
1,2011:
gLi
0.34
0.28
gi
(lb/gal)
lb/gal
(2.8)
(2.3)
kg/i
(lb/gal)
solids
applied
A)
General,
One
Component
B)
General,
Multi-Component
iI
Air
Dried
ii)
Baked
C)
Extreme
High
Gloss
Air Dried
ii)
Baked
0.360
0.61
(5.1)
D)
Extreme
Performance
i)
Air
Dried
0.420
0.80
(6.7)
ii)
Baked
0.360
0.61
(3.0)
(5.1)
E)
Heat
Resistant
i)
Air
Dried
0.420
0.80
(6.7)
ii)
Baked
0.360
0.61
(3.0)
(5.1)
F)
Metallic
0.420
0.80
(3.5)
(6.7)
G)
Pretreatment
Coatings
0.420
0.80
(6.7)
H)
Solar
Absorbent
i)
Air
Dried
0.420
0.80
(3.5)
(6.7)
ii)
Baked
0.360
0.61
(3.0)
(5.1)
1)
Airdried
044
p34*
(2.8)*
2)
Baked
044
(2.8)
0.28*
(2.3)*
(Note:
The
limitations
shall
not
apply
to the
use
of
quick-drying
lacquers
for
repair
of
scratches
and
nicks
that
occur
during
assembly,
provided
that
the
volume
of
coating
does
not
exceed
0.95
1(1
quart)
in
any
one
rolling
eight-hour
period.
On
and
after
May
1.
2011,
these
limitations
shall
also
not
apply
to
stencil coatings,
safety-indicating
coatings,
solid
film lubricants,
electric-insulating
and
thermal-conducting
coatings,
touch-
up
and
repair
coatings,
or
coating
applications
utilizing
hand-held
aerosol
cans.)
3)
On
and
after
May
1,
2011,
an
owner
or
operator
of
a
coating
line
subject
to
the
limitations
in subsection
(h)
of
this
Section shall
apply
all
coatings
using
one
or
more
of
the
following application
methods:
A)
Electrostatic
spray;
B)
High
volume
low
pressure
(HVLP)
spray:
Flow
coating.
For
the
purposes
of
this
subsection
(h).
flow
coating
means
a
non-atomized
technique
of
applying
coating
to
a
substrate
with
a fluid
nozzle
with
no
air
supplied
to
the
nozzle:
D)
Roll
coating:
E)
Brush
coating:
0.52
0.52*
0.42
0.42*
lb/gal
(1.7)
(1.7)*
(4.3)
(4.3)*
(3.5)
(35)*
C)
F)
Dip
coating,
including
electrodeposition.
For
puoses
of
this
subsection
(h),
electrodeposition
means
a water-borne
dip
coating
process
in
which
opposite
electrical
charges
are
applied
to the
substrate
and
the coating.
The
coating
is
attracted
to
the
substrate
due
to
the
electrochemical
potential difference
that
is
created:
or
G)
Another coating
application
method
capable
of
achieving
a
transfer
efficiency
equal
to
or better
than
that
achieved
by
HVLP spraying,
if
such
method
is approved
in
writing
by
the
Agency.
kg/i
i)
Magnet
Wire
Coating
0.20
0.20*
j)
Miscellaneous
Metal
Parts
and
Products
Coating
1)
Clear
coating
2)
Extreme performance
coating
A)
Air
dried
B)
Baked
0.42
(3.5)
0.40*
(33)*
3)
Steel
pail and
drum interior
0.52
(4.3)
coating
0.52*
(4.3)*
4)
All other
coatings
A)
Air Dried
0.42
(3.5)
0.40*
(33)*
B)
Baked
0.36
(3.0)
0.34*
(2.8)*
5)
Metallic
Coating
A)
Air Dried
0.42
(3.5)
0.42*
(3.5)*
B)
Baked
0.36
(3.0)
0.36
(3.0)*
6)
For purposes
of
subsection
219.204(j)(5)
of this Section,
“metallic
coating”
means
a
coating
which
contains
more
than
1/4 lb/gal
of
metal
particles,
as applied.
k)
Heavy Off-Highway
Vehicle
Products
kg/l
lb/gal
Coating
1)
Extreme
performance
prime
coat
0.42
(3.5)
0.42*
(3.5)*
2)
Extreme
performance
topcoat
(air
0.42
(3.5)
dried)
0.42*
(3.5)*
3)
Final
repair coat
(air
dried)
0.42
(3.5)
0.42*
(3.5)*
4)
All
other coatings
are
subject
to the emission
limitations
for
miscellaneous
metal
parts and
products
coatings
in
subsection
(j)
above.
1)
Wood Furniture
Coating
1)
Limitations
before
March
15,
kg/I
lb/gal
1998:
A)
Clear
topcoat
0.67
(5.6)
B)
Opaque
stain
0.56
(4.7)
C)
Pigmented
coat
0.60
(5.0)
D)
Repair
coat
0.67
(5.6)
F)
Sealer
0.67
(5.6)
F)
Semi-transparent
stain
0.79
(6.6)
G)
Wash
coat
0.73
(6.1)
(Note:
Prior
to
March
15,
1998,
an
owner
or
operator
of a
wood
furniture
coating
operation
subject
to this
Section
shall
apply
all
coatings,
with
the
exception
of no
more
than
37.8
1(10
gal)
of
coating
per
day
used
for
touch-up
and
repair
operations,
using
one
or more
of
the
following
application
systems:
airless
spray
application
system,
air-assisted
airless
spray
application
system,
electrostatic
spray
application system,
electrostatic
bell
or disc
spray
application
system,
heated
airless
spray
application
system,
roller
coating,
brush
or wipe
coating
application
system,
dip
coating
application
system
or
high
volume
low pressure
(HVLP)
application
system.)
2)
On
and
after
March
15,
1998,
wood
furniture
sealers
and
topcoats
must
comply
with
one
of
the
limitations
specified
in
subsections
(l)(2)(A) through
(B),
below:
kg
VOMJkg
lb
VOM/ib
solids
solids
A)
Topcoat
0.8
(0.8)
B)
Sealers
and
topcoats
with
the
following
limits:
1)
Sealer
other
than
1.9
(1.9)
acid-cured
alkyd
amino
vinyl
sealer
ii)
Topcoat
other
than
1.8
(1.8)
acid-cured
alkyd
amino
conversion
varnish
topcoat
iii)
Acid-cured
alkyd
2.3
(2.3)
amino
vinyl
sealer
iv)
Acid-cured
ailcyd
2.0
(2.0)
amino
conversion
varnish
topcoat
C)
Meet
the
provisions
of
Section
219.215
of
this
Subpart
for
use
of
an
averaging
approach;
D)
Achieve
a
reduction
in
emissions
equivalent
to
the
requirements
of Section
219.204(l)(2)(A)
or
(B)
of
this
Subpart,
as
calculated using
Section
219.2
16
of
this
Subpart;
or
E)
Use
a
combination
of
the
methods
specified
in
Section
219.204(l)(2)(A)
through
(D)
of
this
Subpart.
3)
Other
wood
furniture
coating
limitations
on
and
after
March 15,
1998:
kg/i
lb/gal
A)
Opaque stain
0.56
(4.7)
B)
Non-topcoat
pigmented
0.60
(5.0)
coat
C)
Repair coat
0.67
(5.6)
D)
Semi-transparent
stain
0.79
(6.6)
E)
Wash
coat
0.73
(6.1)
4)
Other
wood
furniture
coating
requirements
on
and
after
March
15,
1998:
A)
No
source
subject
to
the
limitations
of
subsection
(l)(2)
or
(3)
of
this
Section
and
utilizing
one
or
more
wood
furniture
coating spray
booths
shall
use
strippable
spray
booth
coatings
containing
more
than
0.8
kg
VOM/kg
solids
(0.8
lb
VOM/lb
solids),
as
applied.
B)
Any
source
subject
to
the
limitations
of
subsection
(l)(2)
or
(3) of
this
Section
shall
comply
with
the
requirements
of
Section
219.217
of
this
Subpart.
C)
Any
source
subject
to
the
limitations
of
subsection
(l)(2)(A)
or
(B)
of
this
Section
and
utilizing
one
or
more
continuous
coaters,
shall
for
each
continuous
coater,
use
an initial
coating
which
complies
with
the
limitations
of
subsection
(l)(2)(A)
or
(B)
of
this
Section.
The
viscosity
of
the
coating
in
each
reservoir
shall
always
be
greater
than
or
equal
to the
viscosity
of
the
initial
coating
in
the
reservoir.
The
owner
or operator
shall:
i)
Monitor
the
viscosity
of
the coating
in
the
reservoir
with
a viscosity
meter
or
by
testing
the
viscosity
of
the
initial
coating
and
retesting
the
coating
in
the
reservoir
each
time
solvent
is
added;
ii)
Collect
and
record
the
reservoir
viscosity
and
the
amount
and
weight
of
VOM
per weight
of
solids
of
coating
and
solvent
each
time
coating
or
solvent
is
added;
and
iii)
Maintain
these
records
at the
source
for
a period
of
three
years.
m)
Plastic
Parts
Coating:
kg/l
lb/gal
Automotive/Transportation
1)
Interiors
A)
Baked
i)
Color
coat
0.49*
(4.1)*
ii)
Primer
0.46*
(3.8)*
B)
Air
Dried
i)
Color
coat
0.3
8*
(3.2)*
ii)
Primer
0.42*
(35)*
2)
Exteriors
(flexible
and
non
flexible)
A)
Baked
i)
Primer
0.60*
(5.0)*
ii)
Primer
non-flexible
0.54*
(45)*
iii)
Clear coat
0.52*
(43)*
iv)
Color
coat
0.55*
(4.6)*
B)
Air
Dried
i)
Primer
0.66*
(55)*
ii)
Clear
coat
0.54*
(4.5)*
iii)
Color
coat
(red
&
0.67*
(56)*
black)
iv)
Color
coat
(others)
0.61*
(5.l)*
3)
Specialty
A)
Vacuum
metallizing
0.66*
(5.5)*
basecoats,
texture
basecoats
B)
Black
coatings, reflective
0.71*
(5.9)*
argent coatings,
air
bag
cover
coatings, and
soft
coatings
C)
Gloss
reducers,
vacuum
0.77*
(6.4)*
metallizing
topcoats,
and
texture
topcoats
D)
Stencil
coatings,
adhesion
0.82*
(6.8)*
primers,
ink
pad coatings,
electrostatic
prep coatings,
and
resist coatings
E)
Head lamp
lens coatings
0.89*
(7.4)*
n)
Plastic
Parts
Coating: Business
Machine
kg/i
lb/gal
1)
Primer
0.14*
(l.2)*
2)
Color coat
(non-texture
coat)
0.28*
(2.3)*
3)
Color
coat (texture
coat)
0.28*
(2.3)*
4)
Electromagnetic
interference/radio
0.48*
(4.0)*
frequency
interference
(EML/RFI)
shielding
coatings
5)
Specialty
Coatings
A)
Soft
coat
0.52*
(43)*
B)
Plating
resist
0.71*
(5.9)*
C)
Plating
sensitizer
0.85*
(7.1)*
(Source:
Amended
at
_Ill. Reg.
effective______
Section
219.205
Daily-Weighted
Average
Limitations
No
owner or
operator
of
a coating
line subject
to the
limitations
of Section
2
19.204
of
this
Subpart and
complying
by
means of
this
Section
shall operate
the subject
coating
line
unless
the
owner
or operator
has
demonstrated
compliance
with
subsection
(a),
(b), (c),
(d),
(e), (f),
(g),
ef-(h), or
(i)
of
this Section
(depending
upon
the category
of coating)
through
the
applicable
coating
analysis
test
methods
and procedures
specified
in Section
219.105(a)
of this
Part
and
the
recordkeeping
and reporting
requirements
specified
in
Section
219.211(d)
of
this Subpart:
a)
No
owner or
operator of
a coating
line subject
to only
one
of the
limitations
from among
Section
219.204(a)(l),
(a)(4),
Ee-(d),
(e),
(f), e
(i),
or,
prior
to May 1, 2011,
(c)
of
this Subpart
shall
apply
coatings
on any
such
coating
line,
during
any
day,
whose
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
exceeds
the emission
limitation
to which
the
coatings
are subject.
b)
No
owner or
operator of
a
miscellaneous
metal
parts
and
products
coating
line subject
to
the limitations
of Section
219.204(j)
of
this Subpart
shall
apply
coatings
to miscellaneous
metal
parts or
products
on
the
subject
coating
line
unless the
requirements
in subsection
(b)(l)
or (b)(2)
of this
Section
are
met.
1)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
multiple
coatings,
all
of
which
are
subject to
the same numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
219.204(j)
of
this
Subpart
during
the
same
day
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on the line
are subject
to 0.42
kg/l
(3.5
lbs/gal), the
daily-weighted
average VOM
content
shall
not exceed
the
coating
VOM
content
limit
corresponding
to
the
category
of
coating
used,
or
2)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
coatings
subject
to
more
than
one
numerical
emission
limitation
in
Section
219.204(j)
of
this
Subpart,
during
the
same
day,
the
owner
or
operator
shall
have
a
site-specific
proposal
approved
by
the
Agency
and
approved
by
the
USEPA
as
a
SIP
revision.
To
receive
approval,
the
requirements
of
USEPA’s
Emissions
Trading
Policy
Statement
(and
related
policy)
51
Fed.
Reg.
43814
(December
4,
1986),
must
be
satisfied.
c)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a
can
coating
line
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
219.204(b)
of
this
Subpart
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
using
a
coating
with
a
VOM
content
in
excess
of
the
limitations
specified
in
Section
219.204(b)
of
this
Subpart
unless
all
of
the
following
requirements
are
met:
1)
An
alternative
daily
emission
limitation
for
the
can
coating
operation,
i.e.
for
all
of
the
can
coating
lines
at
the
source,
shall
be
determined
according
to
subsection
(c)(2)
of
this
Section.
Actual
daily
emissions
shall
never
exceed
the
alternative
daily
emission
limitation
and
shall
be
calculated
by
use
of
the
following
equation.
Eb
where:
Ed
=
Actual
VOM
emissions
for
the
day
in
units
of
kg/day
(lbs/day);
i
Subscript
denoting
a
specific
coating
applied;
n
=
Total
number
of
coatings
applied
in
the
can
coating
operation,
i.e.
all
can
coating
lines
at
the
source;
V
=
Volume
of
each
coating
applied
for
the
day
in
units
of
1/day
(gal/day)
of
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM);
C
1
The
VOM
content
of
each
coating
as
applied
in
units
of
kg
VOM/l
(lbs
VOM/gal)
of
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
defmition
of
VOM).
2)
The
alternative
daily
emission
limitation
(Ad)
shall
be
determined
for
the can
coating
operation,
i.e.
for all
of the
can
coating
lines
at
the
source,
on
a daily
basis
as follows:
where:
Ad
=
The VOM
emissions
allowed
for the
day
in units
of
kglday
(lbs/day);
i
Subscript
denoting
a
specific
coating
applied;
n
=
Total
number
of
surface
coatings
applied
in
the
can
coating
operation;
C
1 =
The VOM
content
of
each
surface
coating
as
applied
in
units
of
kg
VOM/l
(lbs
VOM/gal)
of
coating
(minus
water
and any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
defmition
of
VOM);
D1
=
The
density
of
VOM
in each
coating
applied.
For
the
purposes
of
calculating
Ad,
the
density
is
0.882
kg VOM!l
VOM
(7.36
lbs
VOM/gal
VOM);
V1
=
Volume
of
each
surface
coating
applied
for
the
day
in units
of 1
(gal)
of coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM);
L
1 =
The
VOM
emission
limitation
for each
surface
coating
applied
as
specified
in Section
219.204(b)
of
this
Subpart
in
units
of
kg
VOM/l
(lbs
VOM/gal)
of
coating
(minus
water
and
any compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the definition
of
VOM).
d)
No
owner
or
operator
of a
heavy
off-highway
vehicle
products
coating
line
subject
to
the limitations
of Section
219.204(k)
of
this
Subpart
shall
apply
coatings
to heavy
off-highway
vehicle
products
on the
subject
coating
line
unless
the requirements
of
subsection
(d)(1)
or
(d)(2)
of
this
Section
are met.
1)
For each
coating
line
which
applies
multiple
coatings,
all
of which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section 2 19.204(k) of this
Subpart,
during the same
day
(e.g., all
coatings used on the line
are subject to 0.42 kg/i
(3.5 lbs/gal), the
daily-weighted average
VOM content shall not exceed the
coating
VOM content limit corresponding
to the category
of coating used,
or
2)
For each coating line which
applies coatings subject to
more than
one numerical emission limitation
in Section 219.204(k) of this
Subpart, during
the
same day, the
owner or operator shall have a
site
specific proposal approved
by the Agency and
approved by the
TJSEPA as a SIP revision.
To receive approval, the requirements
of USEPA’s Emissions Trading
Policy
Statement
(and related
policy) 51 Fed. Reg. 43814
(December
4, 1986), must be satisfied.
e)
No owner or operator of a wood furniture
coating line subject to the
limitations of
Section 219.204(l)(1)
or (l)(3)
of
this
Subpart
shall apply
coatings
to wood furniture on the
subject coating line unless the
requirements of
subsection
(e)(1) or (e)(2)
of this Section, in addition to
the requirements specified in the
note to Section 219.204(l)(1)
of this
Subpart, are met.
1)
For each coating line which applies
multiple coatings, all of
which
are subject to the same numerical
emission limitation within
Section 219.204(l)(1) or (1)(3) of
this
Subpart,
during the same day
(e.g., all coatings used on the line are subject
to 0.67 kg/i
(5.6
lbs/gal), the daily-weighted
average VOM content shall
not
exceed the coating VOM content
limit corresponding to the
category of coating used, or
2)
For each coating line which
applies coatings subject to more than
one
numerical emission
limitation in Section 219.204(l)(i)
or (l)(3)
of this Subpart, during the
same day, the owner or operator shall
have a site specific proposal approved
by
the
Agency and approved
by
the
USEPA
as a SIP
revision. To receive approval, the
requirements of USEPA’s Emissions
Trading Policy Statement
(and
related policy) 51 Fed. Reg. 43814 (December
4, 1986), must
be satisfied.
f)
No owner or operator of a plastic parts coating line subject
to the
limitations of Section
219.204(m)
or (n) of this Subpart shall
apply
coatings to
business
machine or
automotive/transportation plastic
parts on
the subject coating line unless the
requirements of subsection (f)(1)
or
(f)(2) of this Section are met.
1)
For each coating line which
applies multiple coatings, all of
which
are subject to the
same
numerical emission limitation within
Section
2 19.204(m)
or (n)
of this
Subpart,
during
the same
day
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on the
line are
subject
to 0.42
kg/i
(3.5
lbs/gal),
the
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
shall
not
exceed
the
coating
VOM
content
limit
corresponding
to
the
category
of
coating
used,
or
2)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
coatings
subject
to more
than
one
numerical
emission
limitation
in Section
2 19.204(m)
or
(n) of
this
Subpart,
during
the same
day,
the
owner
or operator
shall
have
a site
specific
proposal
approved
by
the
Agency
and
USEPA
as a
SIP
revision.
To receive
approval,
the
requirements
of USEPA’s
Emissions
Trading
Policy
Statement
(and
related
policy)
must
be
satisfied.
g)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a
metal
furniture
coating
line
subject
to the
limitations
of
Section
219.204(g)
of
this Subpart
shall apply
coatings
on
the subject
coating
line
unless
the requirements
of subsection
(g)(
1) or
(g)(2)
of this
Section
are
met:
1)
For each
coating
line
which
applies
multiple
coatings,
all of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
2 19.204(g)
of this
Subpart,
during
the
same
day
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on the
line
are
subject
to 0.34
kg/i
(2.8
lbs/gal)),
the
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
shall not
exceed
the
coating
VOM
content
limit
corresponding
to
the category
of
coating
used,
or
2)
For
each
coating
line which
applies
coatings
subject
to more
than
one
numerical
emission
limitation
in
Section
2 19.204(g)
of
this
Subpart,
during
the
same
day, the
owner
or
operator
shall
have a
site
specific
proposal
approved
by the
Agency
and
USEPA
as a
SIP
revision.
To
receive
approval,
the
requirements
of USEPA’s
Emissions
Trading
Policy
Statement
(and related
policy)
must
be
satisfied.
h)
No
owner
or
operator
of a
large
appliance
coating
line
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
2 19.204(h)
of this
Subpart
shall
apply
coatings
on
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
of
subsection
(h)(
1) or
(h)(2)
of
this
Section
are met.
1)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
multiple
coatings,
all
of
which
are
subject
to the
same numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
2
19.204(h)
of
this Subpart,
during
the
same
day
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on
the line
are subject
to 0.34
kg/i
(2.8 lbs/gal)),
the
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
shall
not
exceed
the coating
VOM
content
limit
corresponding
to
the
category
of coating
used,
or
2)
For
each
coating line
which
applies
coatings
subject
to
more
than
one
numerical
emission
limitation
in
Section
219.204(h)
of this
Subpart,
during the
same
day,
the
owner
or
operator
shall
have
a
site
specific
proposal
approved
by
the
Agency
and
USEPA
as
a
SIP
revision.
To receive
approval,
the
requirements
of
USEPA’s
Emissions
Trading
Policy
Statement
(and
related
policy)
must
be
satisfied.
i)
On
and
after
May
1,
2011,
no
owner
or
operator
of
a paper
coating
line
subject to
the
limitations
of
Section
219.204(c)
of this
Subpart shall
apply
coatings
on
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(i)(1)
or
(i)(2)
of
this
Section
are
met:
1)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
multiple
coatings,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
219.204(c)
during
the
same
day
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on
the
line
are
subject
to
0.40
kg/kg
solids
[0.08
kg/kg
coatingsi),
the
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
shall
not
exceed
the
coating
VOM
content limit
corresponding
to the
category
of
coating
used;
or
2)
For
each
coating
line
which
applies
coatings
subject
to
more
than
one
numerical
emission
limitation
in
Section
2
19.204(c)
during
the
same
day,
the
owner
or
operator
shall
have
a
site-specific
proposal
approved
by
the
Agency and
approved
by
the
USEPA
as
a SIP
revision. To
receive
approval,
the
requirements
of USEPA’s
Emissions
Trading Policy
Statement
(and
related
policy),
51
Fed.
Reg.
43814 (December
4,
1986),
must
be
satisfied.
Alternative
Emission
Limitations
(Source:
Amended at
_Il1. Reg.
effective______
Section 219.207
a)
Any
owner
or
operator of
a
coating
line
subject
to
Section
2 19.204
of
this
Subpart
may
comply
with
this
Section,
rather
than
with
Section
2 19.204
of
this
Subpart,
if
a
capture
system
and
control
device
are
operated
at
all
times the
coating
line
is
in
operation
and
the
owner
or
operator
demonstrates
compliance
with
subsection
(c),
(d),
(e),
(f),
(g),
(h),
(i),
or
(j),
or
(k)
of
this
Section
(depending
upon
the
source
category)
through
the
applicable
coating
analysis
and
capture
system
and
control
device
efficiency
test
methods
and
procedures
specified
in Section
2 19.105
of
this
Part
and
the
recordkeeping
and
reporting
requirements
specified
in
Section
219.211(e)
of
this
Subpart;
and
the
control
device
is
equipped
with
the
applicable
monitoring
equipment
specified
in
Section
219.105(d)
of
this
Part
and
the
monitoring
equipment
is
installed,
calibrated,
operated
and maintained
according
to
vendor
specifications
at all
times
the control
device
is
in
use.
A
capture
system
and control
device,
which
does not
demonstrate
compliance
with
subsection
(c),
(d),
(e),
(f),
(g),
(h),
(i),
(j),
or
(k)
of this
Section
may be
used
as
an
alternative
to
compliance
with
Section
219.204
of
this Subpart
only
if the
alternative
is approved
by
the
Agency
and
approved
by
the USEPA
as
a SIP
revision.
b)
Alternative
Add-On
Control
Methodologies
1)
The coating
line
is
equipped
with a
capture
system
and control
device
that
provides
81
percent
reduction
in
the
overall
emissions
of VOM
from
the
coating
line and
the
control
device
has
a
90
percent
efficiency,
or
2)
The
system
used to
control
VOM
from
the coating
line is
demonstrated
to
have
an
overall
efficiency
sufficient
to
limit
VOM
emissions
to
no more
than
what
is allowed
under
Section
2
19.204
of this
Subpart.
Use of
any control
system
other
than
an
afterburner,
carbon
adsorption,
condensation,
or absorption
scrubber
system
can be
allowed
only
if approved
by the Agency
and
approved
by
the USEPA
as a
SIP
revision.
The use
of transfer
efficiency
credits
can
be
allowed
only
if approved
by
the
Agency
and
approved
by
the
USEPA
as a
SIP revision.
Baseline
transfer
efficiencies
and
transfer
efficiency
test methods
must
be approved
by the
Agency
and
the USEPA.
Such
overall
efficiency
is to
be
determined
as
follows:
A)
Obtain
the emission
limitation
from
the
appropriate
subsection
in
Section
219.204
of
this Subpart;
B)
Calculate
“S”
according
to
the equation
in
Section
2
19.206
of this
Subpart;
C)
Calculate
the
overall
efficiency
required
according
to
Section
219.105(e)
of this
Part. For
the
purposes
of
calculating
this
value,
according
to the
equation
in Section
219.105(e)(2)
of
this
Part,
VOM
1
is
equal
to
the value
of
“5”
as
determined
above
in subsection
(b)(2)(B)
of
this
Section.
c)
No
owner
or
operator
of a
coating
line
subject
to only
one
of the
emission
limitations
from
among
Section
219.204(a)(1),
(a)(4),
e-(d),
(e),
(f) e
(i),
or,
prior
to
May
1, 2011,
(c)
of
this
Subpart
and equipped
with
a
capture
system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)(1)
or
(b)(2)
of this
Section
are
met.
No
owner
or
operator
of
a
coating
line
subject
to
Section
219.204(a)(2)
or
(a)(3)
of
this
Part
and
equipped
with
a
capture
system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the
coating
line
unless
the
owner
or
operator
demonstrates
compliance
with
such
limitation
in
accordance
with
the
topcoat
protocol
referenced
in
Section
219.105(b)
of
this
Part.
d)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a
miscellaneous
metal parts
and
products
coating
line
which
applies
one
or
more
coatings
during
the
same
day,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
219.204(j)
of
this
Subpart
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on
the
line
are
subject
to
0.42
kg/i
[3.5
lbs/gal],
and
which
is
equipped
with
a capture
system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)(
1)
or
(b)(2)
of
this
Section
are
met.
e)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a heavy
off-highway
vehicle
products
coating
line
which
applies
one
or
more
coatings
during
the
same
day,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
2
19.204(k)
of
this
Subpart
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on
the
line
are
subject
to
0.42
kg/i
[3.5
lbs/gal]),
and
which
is
equipped
with
a
capture system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)(1)
or (b)(2)
of
this
Section
are
met.
f)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a
wood
furniture
coating
line
which
applies
one
or
more
coatings
during
the
same
day,
all
of which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
219.204(1)
of
this
Subpart
(e.g.,
all
coatings
used
on
the
line
are
subject
to
0.67
kg/l
[5.6
lbs/gal]),
and
which
is equipped
with
a capture
system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)(1)
or
(b)(2)
of
this
Section
are
met.
If compliance
is
achieved
by
meeting
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)(2)
of
this
Section,
then
the
provisions
in
the
note
to
Section
2
19.204(1)
of
this
Subpart
must
also
be
met.
g)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a
can
coating
line
and
equipped
with
a
capture
system
and
control device
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(g)(
1)
or
(g)(2)
of
this
Section
are
met.
1)
An
alternative
daily
emission
limitation
for
the
can
coating
operation,
i.e.
for
all
of
the
can
coating
lines
at
the
source,
shall
be
determined
according
to
Section
219.205(c)(2)
of
this
Subpart.
Actual
daily
emissions
shall
never
exceed
the
alternative
daily
emission
limitation
and
shall
be
calculated
by
use
of
the
following
equation:
n
Ed=
V
1
C
1
(1-F
1
)
i=1
where:
Ed=
Actual
VOM
emissions
for the
day
in units
of
kg/day
(lbs/day);
i
Subscript
denoting
the
specific
coating
applied;
n=
Total
number
of surface
coatings
as applied
in the
can
coating
operation;
V=
Volume
of
each coating
as
applied
for the day
in
units
of 1/day
(gal/day)
of coating
(minus
water and
any
compounds
which
are specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of VOM);
C=
The
VOM content
of
each
coating
as applied
in
units
of kg
VOMJ1 (lbs
VOM/gal)
of coating
(minus
water
and any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the definition
of
VOM) and
F=
Fraction,
by weight,
of VOM
emissions
from the
surface coating,
reduced
or
prevented
from being
emitted
to
the ambient
air.
This
is the overall
efficiency
of
the
capture system
and
control device.
2)
The coating
line
is
equipped
with
a capture
system
and
control
device
that
provide 75
percent reduction
in the
overall
emissions
of
VOM from
the coating
line
and
the
control
device
has
a 90 percent
efficiency.
h)
No
owner or
operator
of a
plastic
parts coating
line
which applies
one
or
more
coatings during
the
same
day, all
of which
are subject
to the same
numerical
emission
limitation
within Section
2 19.204(m)
or (n)
of this
Subpart
(e.g., all
coatings
used
on the
line are subject
to 0.42
kg/i [3.5
lbs/gal]),
and
which
is equipped
with a capture
system
and control
device
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in subsection
(b)(1)
or (b)(2)
of
this
Section
are met.
i)
Prior
to May 1.
2011, noNe
owner
or
operator
of a metal
furniture coating
line
which applies
one or more
coatings
during
the
same day,
all
of
which
are
subject
to
the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
2
19.204(g) of
this
Subpart
(e.g., all coatings
used
on
the line
are subject
to
0.34
kg/l [2.8
lbs/gal]), and
which
is equipped
with
a capture
system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)(1)
or (b)(2)
of
this
Section
are met.
j)
Prior
to
May
1, 2011,
noNe
owner
or
operator
of
a large
appliance
coating
line
which
applies
one
or more
coatings
during
the same
day,
all
of which
are
subject
to the
same
numerical
emission
limitation
within
Section
2 19.204(h)
of this
Subpart
(e.g.,
all coatings
used
on
the
line
are
subject
to
0.34
kgll
[2.8
lbs/gal]), and
which
is
equipped
with a
capture
system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless
the
requirements
in
subsection
(b)(1)
or
(b)(2)
of
this
Section
are
met.
k)
On
and after
May
1,
2011,
no
owner
or
operator
of
a paper
coating
line,
metal
furniture
coating
line,
or
large
appliance
coating
line
which
is
equipped
with
a
capture
system
and
control
device
shall
operate
the
subject
coating
line
unless
either:
1)
The
capture
system
and
control
device
provide
at
least
90
percent
reduction
in
the overall
emissions
of
VOM
from
the coating
line;
or
2
The
owner
or
operator
complies
with
the
applicable
limitation
set
forth
in
Section
2 19.204
of
this
Subpart
by utilizing
a combination
of
low-VOM
coatings
and
a
capture
system
and
control
device.
Compliance Schedule
(Source:
Amended
at
_Ill.
Reg.
effective______
Section
219.210
Every
owner
or
operator
of
a coating
line
(of
a type
included
within
Section
2 19.204
of
this
Subpart)
shall
comply
with
the
requirements
of Section
219.204,
219.205,
219.207
or
219.208
and
Section
219.211
or
Sections
219.212
and
219.213
of this
Subpart
in
accordance with
the appropriate compliance
schedule
as specified
in
subsection
(a),
(b),
(c),
(d),
(e)
ef-(f),
or
(g)
below:
a)
No owner
or operator
of
a
coating
line
which
is
exempt
from
the
limitations
of
Section
2 19.204
of this
Subpart
because
of
the
criteria
in
Section
2 19.208(a)
or
(b) of
this
Subpart
shall
operate
said
coating
line
on
or after
a
date consistent
with
Section
2 19.106
of this
Part,
unless
the
owner
or
operator
has
complied
with,
and
continues
to
comply
with,
Section
219.211(b)
of
this
Subpart.
b)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a coating
line
complying
by
means
of Section
2
19.204
of
this
Subpart
shall
operate
said
coating
line
on
or
after
a date
consistent
with
Section
219.106
of
this
Part,
unless
the
owner
or
operator
has
complied
with,
and
continues
to comply
with,
Sections
219.204
and
219.211(c)
of
this
Subpart.
c)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a coating
line
complying
by
means
of Section
219.205
of
this
Subpart
shall
operate
said
coating
line
on
or after
a date
consistent
with
Section
219.106
of
this
Part,
unless
the
owner
or operator
has
complied
with,
and
continues
to
comply
with,
Sections
219.205
and
219.211(d)
of this
Subpart.
d)
No
owner
or
operator
of
a coating
line complying
by
means
of Section
2
19.207
of
this
Subpart
shall
operate
said
coating
line on
or
after
a date
consistent
with
Section
2 19.106
of
this
Part, unless
the
owner
or
operator
has
complied
with,
and
continues
to comply
with,
Sections
2
19.207
and
219.211(e)
of
this
Subpart.
e)
No owner
or
operator
of
a coating
line subject
to
one
or
more
of
the
emission limitations
contained
in
Section
2
19.204
of this
Subpart
on
or
after
March
15,
1996,
choosing
to
comply
by
means
of Section
2 19.204,
219.205
or 219.207
of
this
Subpart,
shall
operate
said
coating
line
on or
after
March
15,
1996,
unless
the
owner
or operator
complies
with
and
continues
to comply
with,
respectively,
the
applicable
requirements
in
Section
219.204,
or
the
alternative
control
options
in Sections
219.205
or
219.207 and
the
requirements
of
Section
219.211.
f)
No owner
or
operator
of
a
coating
line
subject
to
one
or more
of
the
emission
limitations contained
in
Section
2
19.204
of this
Subpart
on
or
after
March
15,
1996,
choosing
to
comply
by
means
of Section
219.212
of
this
Subpart,
shall
operate
said coating
line
on
or
after
March
15,
1996,
unless
the
owner
or
operator
complies
with
and
continues
to
comply
with
the
requirements
of Sections
219.212
and 219.213
of
this
Subpart.
g)
No
owner
or operator
of a
coating
line
subject
to
the
emission
limitations
in Section
219.204(c)(2),
219.204(g)(2),
or
219.204(h)(2) of
this
Subpart
shall
operate
said
coating
line
on
or
after
a
date consistent
with
Section
219.106(c)
of
this
Part,
unless
the
owner
or
operator
has complied
with,
and
continues
to
comply
with,
Section
219.204(c)(2),
219.204(g)(2),
or
2l9.204(h)(2),
as
applicable,
or the
alternative
control
options
in
Section
219.205
or
219.207,
and
all
applicable
requirements
in
Sections
219.211
and
2 19.218
of
this
Subpart.
(Source:
Amended at
Ill. Reg.
effective______
Section
219.211
Recordkeeping
and
Reporting
a)
The
VOM
content
of
each
coating
and
the
efficiency
of
each
capture
system
and
control
device
shall
be determined
by the
applicable
test
methods
and
procedures
specified
in
Section
219.105
of this
Part
to
establish
the records
required
under
this
Section.
b)
Any
owner
or operator
of
a
coating
line
which
is
exempted
from
the
limitations
of Section
219.204
of
this
Subpart
because
of
Section
2 19.208(a)
or
(b)
of
this
Subpart
shall
comply
with
the following:
1)
For sources
exempt
from
Section
219.208(a)
of
this
Subpart,
by
a
date
consistent
with
Section
2 19.106
of
this
Part,
the
owner
or
operator
of a
coating
line
or group
of
coating
lines
referenced
in
subsection
(b)
of
this
Section
shall
certify
to the
Agency
that
the
coating
line
or
group
of coating
lines
is
exempt
under
the
provisions
of
Section
219.208(a)
of
this
Subpart.
Such
certification shall
include:
A)
A
declaration
that
the
coating
line
is exempt
from
the
limitations
of
Section
2 19.204
of
this
Subpart
because
of
Section
2
19.208(a)
of
this Subpart;
and
B)
Calculations
which
demonstrate
that
the combined
VOM
emissions
from the
coating
line
and
all other
coating
lines
in
the
same
category
never
exceed
6.8
kg
(15
lbs) per
day
before
the
application
of
capture
systems
and
control
devices.
The
following
equation
shall
be
used
to calculate
total
VOM
emissions:
=(A
1
B
1
).
j=1
1=1
where:
Te
=
Total
VOM
emissions
from
coating
lines
each
day
before
the
application
of
capture
systems
and
control
devices
in
units
of
kg/day
(lbs/day);
m =
Number
of coating
lines
at the
source
that
otherwise
would
be subject
to the
same
subsection
of
Section
219.104
of
this
Part
(because
they
belong
to the
same
category,
e.g.,
can
coating);
j
=
Subscript
denoting
an
individual
coating line;
n
Number
of different
coatings
as applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line;
i
=
Subscript
denoting
an
individual
coating;
A
1
=
Weight
of VOM
per volume
of each
coating
(minus
water
and any
compounds
which
are specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM)
as
applied
each day
on
each
coating
line
in
units
of kg
VOMJ1
(lbs
VOM/gal);
B
1
=
Volume
of
each
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM)
as applied
each
day on
each
coating
line
in units
of
1/day
(gal/day).
The
instrument
or
method
by
which
the
owner
or
operator
accurately
measured
or
calculated
the
volume
of each
coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
line
each
day
shall be
described
in
the
certification
to the
Agency.
2)
For
sources
exempt
under
Section
219.208(b)
of this
Subpart,
by
March
15,
1998,
or
upon
initial
start-up,
the
owner
or operator
of
a
coating
line
or
a group
of
coating
lines
referenced
in
subsection
(b)
of
this Section
shall
certify
to
the Agency
that
the source
is exempt
under
the
provisions
of
Section
219.208(b)
of
this
Subpart.
Such
certification
shall include:
A)
A
declaration
that
the
source
is
exempt
from
the
limitations
of Section
219.204(1)
of this
Subpart
because
of
Section
219.208(b)
of
this Subpart;
and
B)
Calculations
which
demonstrate
that
the
source
meets
the
criteria
of
exemption
because
of Section
2 19.208(b)
of this
Subpart.
3)
For sources
exempt
under
Section
219.208(a)
of
this
Subpart,
on
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
219.106
of this
Part,
the
owner
or
operator
of a
coating
line
or
group
of lines
referenced
in
this
subsection
shall
collect
and record
all
of the
following
information
each
day
for
each
coating
line
and maintain
the
information
at the
source
for
a
period
of
three
years:
A)
The
name
and identification
number
of
each coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
line;
and
B)
The
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
and
the
volume
of
each
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the definition
of
VOM)
as
applied
each
day on
each
coating
line.
4)
For
sources
exempt
under
Section
2
19.208(b)
of
this
Subpart,
on
and
after March
15,
1998,
the
owner
or
operator
of
a
coating
line
or
group
of
coating
lines
referenced
in this
subsection
(b)
shall
collect
and
record
all
of
the
following
information
for
each
coating
line
and
maintain
the
information
at
the
source
for
a
period
of
three
years:
A)
The
name
and
identification
number
of
each
coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
line;
and
B)
The weight
of
VOM
per
volume
and
the
volume
of
each
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM)
as
applied
on
each
coating
line
on
a monthly
basis.
5)
On
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
219.106
of
this
Part,
the
owner
or
operator
of
a
coating
line
or
group of
coating
lines
exempted
from
the
limitations
of
Section
219.204
of
this
Subpart
because
of
Section
2
19.208(a)
of
this
Subpart
shall
notify
the
Agency
of
any
record
showing
that
total
VOM
emissions
from
the
coating
line
or
group
of
coating
lines
exceed
6.8
kg
(15
ibs)
in
any
day
before
the
application
of
capture
systems
and
control
devices
by
sending
a copy
of
such
record
to
the
Agency
within
30
days
after
the
exceedance
occurs.
6)
On
and
after
March 15,
1998,
any
owner
or
operator
of
a
source
exempt
from
the
limitations
of
Section
219.204(1)
of
this
Subpart
because
of
Section
219.208(b)
of
this
Subpart
shall
notify
the
Agency
if
the
source’s
VOM
emissions
exceed
the
limitations
of
Section
219.208(b)
of
this
Subpart
by
sending
a
copy
of
calculations
showing
such
an
exceedance
within
30
days
after
the
change
occurs.
c)
Any
owner
or
operator
of
a
coating
line
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
2
19.204
of
this
Subpart
other
than
Section
219.204(a)(2)
and
(a)(3)
of
this
Subpart
and
complying
by
means
of
Section
219.204
of
this
Subpart
shall
comply
with
the
following:
1)
By
a
date
consistent
with
Section
2
19.106
of
this
Part,
or
upon
initial
start-up
of
a
new
coating
line,
or
upon
changing
the
method
of
compliance
from
an
existing
subject
coating
line
from
Section
219.205,
Section
219.207,
Section
219.215,
or
Section
219.216
of
this
Subpart
to
Section
2 19.204
of
this Subpart;
the
owner
or
operator
of
a
subject
coating
line
shall
certify to
the
Agency
that
the
coating
line
will
be
in
compliance
with
Section
2 19.204
of
this
Subpart
on
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
219.106
of
this
Part,
or on
and
after
the
initial
start-up
date.
Such
certification
shall
include:
A)
The name
and identification
number
of
each
coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
line;
B)
The
weight
of VOM
per
volume
of each
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the definition
of VOM)
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line;—an4
C)
On
and
after
March
15,
1998,
for
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of Section
219.204(l)(2)(A)
or
(B)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of VOM
per
weight
of
solids
in
each
coating
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line
D)
For
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of Section
219.204(c)(2)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of
solids
(or
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of
coatings,
as
applicable)
in
each
coating
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line;
and
E)
For
coating
lines
subject
to the
limitations
of
Section
219.204(g)(2)
or
219.204(h)(2)
of this
Subpart,
the
application
method(s)
used
to
apply
coatings
on the
subject
coating
line
and
the
weight
of VOM
per
volume
of
each
coating
(or
the
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
solids
in
each
coating,
as applicable)
as applied
each
day on
each
coating
line.
2)
On
and
after
a
date consistent
with
Section
219.106
of
this
Part,
or
on
and after
the
initial
start-up
date,
the
owner
or operator
of a
subject
coating
line shall
collect
and
record
all
of the
following
information
each
day
for
each
coating
line
and
maintain
the
information
at
the source
for a
period
of
three
years:
A)
The
name
and
identification
number
of
each coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
line;
B)
The
weight
of VOM
per
volume
of each
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of VOM)
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line;
C)
On and
after
March
15,
1998,
for
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
219.204(1)(2)(A)
or
(B)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of
solids
in
each
coating
as applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line
and
certified product
data
sheets
for
each
coating;-a4
D)
On
and
after
March
15,
1998,
for wood
furniture
coating
spray
booths
subject
to
the
limitation
of
Section
219.204(l)(4)(A)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of
solids
in
each
strippable
spray
booth
coating
as
applied
each
day
on
each
spray
booth
and
certified
product
data
sheets
for
each
coating
E)
For
coating
lines
subject
to the
limitations
of
Section
219.204(c)(2)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of solids
(or
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of
coatings,
as
applicable)
in each
coating
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line,
and
certified
product
data
sheets
for
each
coating
and
F)
For
coating lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
219.204(g)(2)
or
219.204(h)(2)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
each
coating
(or
the
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
solids
in
each
coating,
as applicable)
as applied
each
day
on
each
coating line,
and
certified
product
data
sheets
for
each
coating.
3)
On
and
after
a date
consistent
with
Section
219.106
of this
Part,
the
owner
or
operator
of a
subject
coating
line
shall
notify
the
Agency
in
the
following
instances:
A)
Any
record
showing
violation
of
Section
219.204
of
this
Subpart
shall
be reported
by
sending
a
copy
of such
record
to
the
Agency
within
30
days
following the
occurrence
of
the
violation.
B)
At
least
30
calendar
days
before
changing
the
method
of
compliance
from
Section
219.204
to Section
219.205
or
Section
219.207
of this
Subpart,
the owner
or
operator
shall
comply
with
all requirements
of
subsection
(d)(1)
or
(e)(1)
below,
respectively.
Upon
changing
the
method
of
compliance
from
Section
2 19.204
to
Section
2
19.205 or
Section 2 19.207
of
this
Subpart,
the
owner
or
operator
shall
comply
with
all
requirements
of
subsection
(d) or
(e)
of this
Section,
respectively.
d)
Any
owner
or
operator
of
a coating
line
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section 219.204
of
this
Subpart
and
complying
by
means
of
Section
2 19.205
of
this
Subpart
shall
comply
with
the
following:
1)
By
a
date consistent
with
Section
219.106
of
this Part,
or
upon
initial
start-up
of
a new
coating
line,
or
upon
changing
the
method
of
compliance
for
an
existing
subject
coating
line
from
Section
219.204
or
Section
219.207
to Section
219.205
of
this Subpart;
the
owner
or
operator
of
the
subject
coating
line
shall
certify
to
the
Agency
that the
coating
line
will
be in
compliance
with
Section
219.205
on and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
219.106
of
this
Part,
or
on
and
after
the
initial
start-up
date.
Such
certification
shall
include:
A)
The
name
and
identification
number
of each
coating
line
which
will comply
by
means
of
Section
219.205
of
this
Subpart.
B)
The
name
and identification
number
of each
coating
as
applied
on each
coating
line.
C)
The
weight
of
VOM
per volume
and
the volume
of
each
coating
(minus
water and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of VOM)
as
applied
each
day on
each coating
line.
D)
On
and
after
March
15,
1998, for
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
219.204(l)(2)(A)
or (B)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of solids
in
each
coating
as
applied
each day
on
each
coating
line.
E)
For
coating
lines subject
to the limitations
of
Section
219.204(c)(2)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of VOM
per
weight
of solids
(or
the
weight
of
VOM
per weight
of
coatings,
as
applicable)
in
each
coating
as
applied
each
day
on each
coating
line.
F)
For
coating
lines
subject
to the limitations
of Section
219.204(g)(2)
or 219.204(h)(2)
of
this Subpart,
the
weight
of VOM
per
volume
of each
coating
(or
the
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
solids
in each
coating.
as
applicable)
as applied
each day
on each
coating
line.
GE)
The
instrument
or
method
by
which
the
owner
or operator
will
accurately
measure
or calculate
the
volume
of
each
coating
as applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line.
HF)
The
method
by
which
the
owner
or
operator
will
create
and
maintain
records
each
day
as
required
in
subsection
(d)(2)
of
this
Section.
IG)
An
example
of
the
format
in which
the
records
required
in
subsection
(d)(2)
of
this
Section
will
be
kept.
2)
On
and
after
a
date consistent
with
Section
219.106
of
this
Part,
or
on
and
after the
initial
start-up
date,
the
owner
or
operator
of a
subject coating
line
shall
collect
and
record
all
of
the
following
information
each
day
for
each
coating
line
and
maintain
the
information
at
the
source
for
a
period
of
three
years:
A)
The
name and
identification
number
of
each
coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
line.
B)
The
weight
of VOM
per
volume
and
the
volume
of
each
coating (minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM)
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line.
C)
On
and
after
March
15,
1998,
for
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
219.204(1)(2)(A)
or
(B)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of
solids
in
each
coating
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line.
D)
For
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
219.204(c)(2)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
weight
of
solids
(or
the
weight
of VOM
per
weight
of
coatings,
as
applicable)
in
each
coating
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line.
B)
For
coating
lines
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
219.204(g)(2)
or
219.204(h)(2)
of
this
Subpart,
the
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
each
coating
(or
the
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
solids
in
each
coating,
as
applicable)
as
applied
each
day
on
each coating
line.
FD)
The
daily-weighted
average
VOM
content
of
all
coatings
as
applied
on
each
coating
line
as
defmed
in
Section
219.104
of
this
Part.
3)
On
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
219.106
of
this
Part,
the
owner
or
operator
of
a
subject
coating
line
shall
notify
the
Agency
in
the
following
instances:
A)
Any record
showing
violation
of
Section
219.205
of
this
Subpart
shall
be reported
by
sending
a
copy
of
such
record
to the Agency
within
30 days
following the
occurrence
of
the violation.
B)
At
least 30
calendar
days
before changing
the
method of
compliance
with
this
Subpart
from
Section
2
19.205 to
Section
219.204
or
Section
219.207
of
this Subpart,
the
owner
or
operator
shall
comply with
all requirements
of
subsection
(c)(1)
or
(e)(1) of this
Section,
respectively.
Upon
changing
the method
of
compliance
with
this Subpart
from Section
2 19.205
to Section
2 19.204
or Section
2 19.207
of
this Subpart,
the
owner or
operator
shall comply
with all
requirements
of subsection
(c) or
(e) of this
Section,
respectively.
e)
Any
owner
or
operator
of
a
coating
line
subject
to the limitations
of
Section
2 19.207
and
complying
by means
of
Section
219.207(c),
(d), (e),
(f), (g)
ef-(h),
or
(k)
of this
Subpart
shall comply
with
the
following:
1)
By
a
date
consistent
with
Section
219.106
of
this Part,
or upon
initial
start-up of
a
new
coating
line, or
upon
changing
the
method
of compliance
for an
existing
coating
line from
Section
219.204
or
Section
2
19.205
to
Section
2 19.207
of
this Subpart,
the
owner
or
operator
of the
subject
coating
line
shall perform
all tests
and
submit
to the
Agency
the results
of
all tests
and
calculations
necessary
to
demonstrate
that the subject
coating
line will
be in
compliance
with Section
219.207
of this Subpart
on and
after a
date consistent
with
Section
219.106
of this
Part,
or on and
after
the initial
start-up
date.
2)
On
and after
a date
consistent
with
Section 219.106
of
this Part,
or
on and after
the
initial start-up
date,
the
owner
or operator
of a
subject
coating
line
shall
collect and
record
all of
the
following
information
each day
for
each coating
line
and
maintain the
information
at the
source for
a period
of three
years:
A)
The
weight
of
VOM
per volume
of coating
solids
as
applied
each
day
on each coating
line,
if complying
pursuant
to Section
219.207(b)(2)
of
this Subpart.
B)
Control
device
monitoring
data.
C)
A log of
operating
time
for
the
capture
system,
control
device,
monitoring
equipment
and
the
associated
coating
line.
D)
A
maintenance
log
for
the
capture
system,
control
device
and
monitoring
equipment
detailing
all
routine
and
non-routine
maintenance
performed
including
dates
and
duration
of
any
outages.
3)
On
and after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
219.106
of this
Part,
the
owner
or
operator
of a subject
coating
line
shall
notify
the
Agency
in
the
following
instances:
A)
Any
record
showing
violation
of Section
219.207
of
this
Subpart
shall
be
reported
by
sending
a
copy
of
such
record
to
the
Agency
within
30
days
following
the occurrence
of
the
violation.
B)
At
least
30
calendar
days
before
changing
the
method
of
compliance
with
this
Subpart
from
Section
2
19.207
to
Section
219.204
or
Section
219.205
of this
Subpart,
the
owner
or
operator
shall
comply
with
all
requirements
of
subsection
(c)(1)
or (d)(1)
of
this
Section,
respectively.
Upon
changing
the
method
of
compliance
with
this
Subpart
Part
from
Section
2 19.207
to
Section
2
19.204
or
Section
2 19.205
of
this Subpart,
the
owner
or
operator
shall
comply
with
all
requirements
of subsection
(c)
or
(d)
of
this
Section,
respectively.
I)
Any
owner
or
operator
of a primer
surfacer
operation
or topcoat
operation
subject
to
the
limitations
of
Section
219.204(a)(2)
or
(a)(3)
of
this
Subpart
shall
comply
with
the
following:
1)
By
a date
consistent
with
Section
219.106
of this
Part,
or
upon
initial
start-up
of
a new
coating
operation,
the
owner
or
operator
of
a
subject
coatitig
operation
shall
certify
to
the
Agency
that the
operation
will
be
in
compliance
with
Section
2
19.204
of
this
Subpart
on
and
after
a date
consistent
with
Section
2 19.106
of
this
Part,
or
on and
after
the
initial
start-up
date.
Such
certification
shall
include:
A)
The
name
and
identification
number
of
each
coating
operation
which
will
comply
by
means
of Section
219.204(a)(2)
and
(a)(3)
of this
Subpart
and
the
name
and
identification
number
of
each
coating
line
in
each
coating
operation.
B)
The
name
and identification
number
of
each
coating
as
applied
on each
coating
line
in
the coating
operation.
C)
The
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
each
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM)
as applied
each
day
on each
coating
line.
D)
The transfer
efficiency
and
control
efficiency
measured
for
each
coating
line.
B)
Test
reports,
including
raw data
and
calculations
documenting
the testing
performed
to measure
transfer
efficiency
and
control
efficiency.
F)
The
instrument
or
method
by
which
the
owner
or operator
will
accurately
measure
or calculate
the
volume
of each
coating
as
applied
each
day
on
each
coating
line.
G)
The
method
by
which
the
owner
or operator
will
create
and
maintain
records
each
day
as required
in
subsection
(f)(2)
below.
H)
An example
format
for presenting
the
records
required
in
subsection
(f)(2)
below.
2)
On
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
219.106
of
this
Part,
or
on
and
after
the initial
start-up
date,
the owner
or operator
of
a
subject
coating operation
shall
collect
and
record
all
of the
following
information
each
day
for each
topcoat
or
primer
surfacer
coating
operation
and
maintain
the
information
at the
source
for a
period
of
three
years:
A)
All
information
necessary
to
calculate
the daily-weighted
average
VOM
emissions
from
the
coating
operations
in kg
(ibs)
per
1 (gal)
of
coating
solids
deposited
in
accordance
with
the
proposal
submitted,
and
approved
pursuant
to
Section
219.204(a)(2)
or
(a)(3)
of
this Subpart
including:
i)
The name
and identification
number
of each
coating
as
applied
on
each
coating
operation.
ii)
The
weight
of
VOM
per
volume
of
each
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of VOM)
as
applied
each
day
on each
coating
operation.
B)
If a
control
device(s)
is used
to control
VOM
emissions,
control
device
monitoring
data;
a
log
of
operating
time
for
the
capture
system,
control
device,
monitoring
equipment
and
the
associated
coating
operation;
and
a maintenance
log
for
the
capture
system,
control
device
and
monitoring
equipment,
detailing
all routine
and
non-routine
maintenance
performed
including
dates
and
duration
of
any
outages.
3)
On
and
after
a
date
consistent
with
Section
219.106
of
this Part
or
on
and
after
the
initial
start-up
date,
the
owner
or
operator
of
a
subject
coating
operation
shall
determine
and
record
the daily
VOM
emissions
in
kg
(ibs)
per 1
(gal)
of
coating
solids
deposited
in
accordance
with
the
proposal
submitted
and
approved
pursuant
to
Section
219.204(a)(2)
or
(a)(3)
of
this
Subpart
within
10
days
from
the
end
of
the
month
and
maintain
this
information
at
the
source
for
a period
of
three
years.
4)
On
and
after
a date
consistent
with
Section
219.106
of
this
Part,
the
owner
or
operator
of a
subject
coating
operation
shall
notify
the
Agency
in
the
following
instances:
A)
Any
record
showing
a
violation
of
Section
219.204(a)(2)
or
(a)(3)
of
this
Subpart
shall
be reported
by
sending
a
copy
of
such
record
to the
Agency
within
15
days
from
the end
of
the
month
in which
the
violation
occurred.
B)
The
owner
or
operator
shall
notifS’
the
Agency
of
any
change
to
the operation
at least
30
days
before
the
change
is
effected.
The
Agency
shall
determine
whether
or not
compliance
testing
is required.
If
the
Agency
determines
that
compliance
testing
is required,
then
the
owner
or
operator
shall
submit
a
testing
proposal
to
the
Agency
within
30
days
and
test
within
30
days
of the
approval
of
the
proposal
by the
Agency
and
USEPA.
g)
On
and
after
a date
consistent
with
Section
219.106(c)
of
this
Part,
or on
and after
the
initial
start-up
date,
whichever
is
later,
the owner
or
operator
of a
coating
line
subject
to
the requirements
of
Section
219.218
of
this
Subpart
shall
comply
with
the
following:
1)
By
May
1, 2011,
or upon
initial
start-up,
whichever
is
later,
submit
a
certification
to the
Agency
that
includes
a description
of
the
practices
and
procedures
that
the
source
will
follow
to ensure
compliance
with
the
applicable
requirements
in Section
219.2
18
of
this
Subpart;
2)
Notify
the Agency
of
any
violation
of
Section 219.218
of this
Subpart
by
providing
a description
of the
violation
and
copies
of
records
documenting
such
violation
to the
Agency
within
30
days
following
the
occurrence
of
the
violation;
and
3)
Maintain
at
the
source all
records
required
by
this subsection
(g)
for a minimum
of
three
years
from the
date the
document
was
created
and
make such
records
available
to the
Agency
upon
request.
(Source:
Amended
at _Ill.
Reg.
effective______
Section 219.212
Cross-Line
Averaging
to Establish
Compliance
for Coating
Lines
a)
On
and
after March
15, 1996,
any
owner
or
operator
of a coating
line
subject
to
the limitations
set forth
in Section
2 19.204
of
this
Subpart,
except
coating lines
subject
to the
limitations
in Section
21
9.204(c)(2),
(g)(2),
or
(h)(2)
of
this Subpart,
and
with coating
lines in
operation
prior
to
January
1, 1991
(“pre-existing
coating
lines),
may,
for pre-existing
coating
lines only,
elect
to
comply
with
the requirements
of this Section,
rather
than
complying
with
the applicable
emission
limitations
set
forth
in
Section
219.204,
if an
operational
change
of the type
described
below has
been
made
after
January
1,
1991,
to one or more
pre-existing
coating
lines
at
the source.
An
operational
change
occurs
when
a
pre-existing
coating
line
is
replaced
with a
line
using
lower
VOM
coating
for
the
same
purpose
as
the replaced
line
(“replacement
line”).
A
source electing
to rely
on
this
Section
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
the requirements
of this
Subpart
shall
operate
pursuant
to
federally
enforceable
pennit
conditions
approved
by
the
Agency
and USEPA.
b)
An
owner
or
operator
of
pre-existing
coating
lines
subject to a
VOM
content
limitation
in
Section
2 19.204
of this
Subpart
and electing
to rely
on
this Sectionto
demonstrate
compliance
with
this
Subpart
must
establish,
by use of
the equations
in
subsection
(d)
of
this Section,
that
the
calculated
actual
daily
VOM
emissions
from
all
participating
coating
lines, as defined
below,
are
less than
the calculated
daily
allowable
VOM
emissions
from
the same
group
of
coating
lines. For
any pre-existing
coating line
to be
aggregated
for the
purposes
of
Section
2 19.212,
219.213,
or
219.214 of
this Subpart
(“participating
coating lines”),
the
source
must
establish
that:
1)
All
coatings applied
on
the participating
coating
line
shall,
at
all
times,
have
a VOM
content
less
than
or
equal
to the
applicable
VOM
content
limitation
for
such
coating
listed in Appendix
H of
this
Part;
and
2)
On
the
date
the source
elects to rely
on
this Section
to
demonstrate
compliance
with this
Subpart,
all
coatings
applied on
the
participating
coating
line are
not already
in
compliance
with the
VOM
content
limitation
for
such coating
effective
on or after
March
15, 1996;
or the participating
coating line
is a replacement
line,
as defined
in subsection
(a)
of this Section
with an
operational
change occurring
on
or
after January
1, 1991.
c)
Notwithstanding subsection
(a) of this
Section,
any
owner or
operator
of a
coating
line subject
to the
limitations
set forth
in
Section 2
19.204 of
this
Subpart
and
electing to
rely
on this
Section to
demonstrate
compliance
with
this Subpart,
may
also
include as
a participating
coating
line, until
December31,
1999, only,
any
replacement
line
that
satisfies
all
of
the
following
conditions:
1)
The replacement
line
is operated
as a powder
coating
line;
2)
The replacement
line
was added
after
July 1,
1988;
and
3)
The
owner or
operator
also
includes
as a participating
coating
line
one
or
more
coating
lines
that satisfy
the
criteria
of
a
replacement
line, as described
in
subsection
(a) of this
Section.
d)
To
demonstrate
compliance
with
this Section,
a source
shall
establish
the
following:
1)
An
alternative
daily
emission
limitation
shall be
determined
for all
participating
coating
lines
at the
source
according
to subsection
(d)(2)
of this
Section. All
participating
coating
lines
shall
be
factored
in
each
day
to demonstrate
compliance.
Provided
compliance
is
established
pursuant
to the requirements
in
this
subsection,
nothing in
this
Section
requires
daily
operation
of each
participating
line.
Actual
daily emissions
from
all participating
coating
lines
(Ed)
shall never
exceed
the alternative
daily
emission
limitation
(Ad)
and
shall
be calculated
by
use of
the following
equation:
n
Ed
ViCi
i=1
where:
Ed
=
Actual
daily
VOM
emissions
from participating
coating
lines in
units of kg/day
(lbs/day);
i
=
Subscript
denoting
a specific
coating
applied;
n
=
Total
number
of coatings
applied
by all
participating
coating
lines at the
source;
V
=
Volume
of
each coating
applied
for the
day in units
of
1/day (gal/day)
of coating
(minus water
and any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of VOM);
and
C
1
The
VOM content
of each
coating
as applied
in
units
of
kg
VOM/l
(lbs
VOM/gal)
of coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are specifically
exempted
from
the definition
of
VOM).
2)
The alternative
daily
emission
limitation
(Ad)
shall be determined
for all
participating
coating
lines at
the source
on
a daily
basis
as
follows:
Ad=A1
+
A
where
A
1 and A
are
defined
in subsections
(2)(A)
and
(2)(B)
of this
subsection.
A)
The
portion
of the
alternative
daily emissions
limitation
for
coating
operations
at a source
using
non-powder
coating
(A
1)
shall be
determined
for
all such
participating
non-powder
coating lines
on a daily
basis
as
follows:
n
A
1
=
V
1
L
1
i=l
(D
1
-Lj)
where:
A
1
=
The VOM
emissions
allowed
for the day
in units
of
kg/day
(lbs/day);
I
Subscript
denoting
a specific
coating
applied;
n
=
Total number
of coatings
applied in
the participating
coating
lines;
CI
=
The VOM
content
of each coating
as
applied
in units of
kg
VOM/l(lbs
VOM/gal)
of coating
(minus
water
and any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM);
=
The
density
of
VOM
in
each
coating
applied.
For
the
purposes
of
calculating
A
1
,
the
density
is
0.882
kg
VOM/l
VOM
(7.36
lbs
VOM/gal
VOM);
V
1
=
Volume
of
each
coating
applied
for
the
day
in
units
of
1
(gal)
of
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM);
and
L
1
The
VOM
emission
limitation
for
each
coating
applied,
as
specified
in
Section
219.204
of
this
Subpart,
in
units
of
kg
VOM/l
(lbs
VOM/gal)
of
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are
specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of
VOM).
B)
The
portion
of
the
alternative
daily
emission
limitation
for
coating
operations
at
a
source
using
powdered
coating
(Ar)
shall
be
determined
for
all
such
participating
powder
coating
lines
at
the
source
on
a
daily
basis
as
follows:
m
n
Z
1__DJ_ich
h=1
j=1
(D.-Lj)
where:
The
VOM
emissions
allowed
for
the
day
in
units
of
kg/day
(lbs/day);
h
Subscript
denoting
a
specific
powder
coating
line;
j
Subscript
denoting
a
specific
powder
coating
applied;
m
=
Total
number
of
participating
powder
coating
lines;
n
=
Total
number
of
powder
coatings
applied
in
the
participating
coating
lines;
=
The
assumed
density
of
VOM
in
liquid
coating,
0.882
kg
VOM/l
VOM
(7.36
lbs
VOM/gal
VOM);
Volume
of
each
powder
coating
consumed
for
the
day
in
units
of
1
(gal)
of
coating;
L
=
The VOM
emission
limitation
for
each
coating
applied,
as
specified
in Section
2 19.204
of
this Subpart,
in
units
of kg
VOMJ1
(lbs
VOM/gal)
of
coating
(minus
water
and
any
compounds
which
are specifically
exempted
from
the
definition
of VOM);
and
K
=
A
constant
for
each
individual
coating
line representing
the
ratio
of
the volume
of coating
solids
consumed
on
the
liquid
coating
system
which
has
been
replaced
to
the
volume
of
powder
coating
consumed
on the
replacement
line
to
accomplish
the
same
coating
job.
This
value
shall
be
determined
by
the
source
based
on
tests
conducted
and
records
maintained
pursuant
to the
requirements
of
Section
219.213
of
this
Subpart
demonstrating
the
amount
of
coating
solids
consumed
as
both
liquid
and
powder.
Tests
methods
and
recordkeeping
requirements
shall
be
approved
by
the
Agency
and
USEPA
and
contained
in
the
source!s
operating
permit
as federally
enforceable
permit
conditions,
subject
to
the
following restrictions:
i)
K cannot
exceed
0.9
for
non-recycled
powder
coating
systems;
or
ii)
K cannot
exceed
2.0
for recycled
powder
coating
systems.
(Source:
Amended
at
_Il1.
Reg.
effective______
Section 219.218
Work
Practice
Standards
for
Paper
Coatings,
Metal
Furniture
Coatings, and Large
Appliance
Coatings
a)
On
and
after
May
1,
2011.
every
owner
or
operator
of a source
subject
to
the
requirements
of
Section
2 19.204(c)
of
this Subpart
shall:
1)
Store
all
VOM-containing
cleaning
materials
in closed
containers
2)
Ensure
that
mixing
and
storage
containers
used
for
VOM
containing
materials
are
kept
closed
at
all times
except
when
depositing
or
removing
such
materials;
3)
Minimize
spills
of
VOM-containing
cleaning
materials;
Convey
VOM-containing
cleaning
materials
from
one
location
to
another
in
closed
containers
or
pipes;
and
4)
5)
Minimize
VOM
emissions
from
the
cleaning
of
storage,
mixing,
and
conveying
equipment.
b)
On and
after
May
1,
2011.
every
owner
or operator
of a
source
subject
to
the requirements
of Section
219.204(g)
or 219.204(h)
of this
Subpart
shall:
1)
Store
all
VOM-containing
coatings,
thinners,
coating-related
waste
materials,
cleaning
materials,
and
used
shop
towels
in
closed
containers
2)
Ensure
that mixing
and
storage
containers
used
for
VOM
containing
coatings,
thinners,
coating-related
waste
materials,
and
cleaning
materials
are kept
closed
at
all
times
except
when
depositing
or
removing
such
materials;
3)
Minimize
spills
of
VOM-containing
coatings,
thinners,
coating-
related
waste
materials,
and
cleaning
materials,
and
clean
up
spills
immediately;
4)
Convey
VOM-containing
coatings,
thinners,
coating-related
waste
materials,
and
cleaning
materials
from
one
location
to
another
in
closed
containers
or pipes;
and
5)
Minimize
VOM
emissions
from
the cleaning
of storage,
mixing,
and conveying
equipment.
(Source:
Added
at _Ill.
Reg.
effective______
TECHNICAL
SUPPORT
DOCUMENT
U;
OI1Ljfl
co0is
CONTROL
OF VOLATILE
ORGANIC
MATERIAL
EMISSIONS
IN
NON-ATTAINMENT
AREAS
FROM
PAPER, FILM,
AND
FOIL
COATINGS,
LARGE
APPLIANCE
COATINGS,
AND METAL
FURNITURE
COATINGS
AQPSTR
09-10
October 1, 2009
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION
AGENCY
1021
NORTH GRAND
AVENUE
EAST
P.O.
BOX
19276
SPRINGFIELD,
ILLINOIS 62794-9276
Table
of
Contents
List
of Tables
4
List
of
Acronyms
Executive
Summary
6
1.0
Introduction
7
2.0
Process
Description
and
Source
of
VOM
Emissions
.9
2.1
Paper,
Film,
and
Foil
Coatings
9
2.2
Large
Appliance
Coatings
10
2.3
Metal
Furniture
Coatings.
11
3.0
Technical Feasibility of
Controls
13
3.1
Paper,
Film,
and
Foil
Coatings
.13
3.2
Large
Appliance Coatings
15
3.2.1 Emission
Limits
Based
on
Low-VOM
Coatings
17
3.2.2
Optional Add-On
Controls for Coating Operations.
.17
3.2.3
Work
Practices
for
Coating
Operations
and
Cleaning
Materials
20
3.3
Metal
Furniture Coatings
20
3.3.1
Emission Limits
based
on
Low-VOM
Coatings
22
3.3.2 Add-On
Controls for
Coating
Operations
.22
3.3.3 Work
Practices
for
Coating Operations and
Cleaning Materials
24
4.0
Economic
Reasonableness
26
4.1
Paper,
Film,
and
Foil
Coatings
,26
4.2
Large
Appliance
Coatings
.26
4.3
Metal
Furniture
Coatings
27
5.0
Existing
and
Proposed
Regulations
28
5.1
Existing
Regulations
28
5.1.1 Paper,
Film
and
Foil
Coating
.28
5.1.2 Large
Appliance
Coatings
29
5.1.3
Metal
Furniture
Coatings.
30
5.2
Proposed
Regulations
30
5.2.1
Paper,
Film,
and
Foil
Coatings,
.30
2
5.2.2
Large
Appliance
Coatings
32
5.2.3
Metal
Furniture
Coatings
.33
6.0
Affected Sources
34
7.0
References
36
3
Tables
Table
1.
RACT
Limits
for
Paper,
Film,
and
Foil Coatings
15
Table
2.
Mass
of
VOM
per
Volume
of Coating
for
Large
Appliance
Table
3.
Mass of
VOM
per
Volume
of
Solids
for
Large
Appliance
19
Table 4.
Mass
of
VOM per
Volume
of Coating
for
Metal
Furniture
Coatings
.23
Table
5.
Mass
of VOM
per
Volume
of Solids
for Metal
Furniture
Coatings
24
Table
6.
Existing
VOM
Content
Limits
for
Paper
Coatings
28
Table
7.
Existing
VOM
Content
Limits
for
Large
Appliance
Coatings
29
Table
8.
Existing
Metal
Furniture
Coatings
limits
.30
Table
9.
Proposed
Limits
for Paper
Coatings.
31
Table
10.
VOM
Emission
Reductions
in the
Chicago
and Metro
East
NAAs
34
Table
11.
List of
Affected
Sources
in the Chicago
and Metro
East
NAAs
35
4
List
of
Acronyms
CAA
Clean Air
Act
CO
Carbon
Monoxide
CTG
Control
Techniques Guidelines
Illinois
EPA
Illinois Environmental
Protection
Agency
NAA
Non-attainment
Area
NAAQS
National
Ambient
Air
Quality Standards
NO
Nitrogen Oxides
PTE
Potential To Emit
RACT
Reasonably Available
Control Technology
SIP
State Implementation
Plan
tpy
Tons per year
U.S.
EPA
United States Environmental
Protection
Agency
VOM
Volatile
Organic
Material
5
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
The
Clean Air Act
(CAA)’, as amended in 1990,
requires that state implementation
plans (SIPs)
for
ozone
non-attainment areas (NAAs) be revised
in accordance with
the implementation of
reasonably available
control
technology
(RACT). For control
of volatile organic materials
(VOM), which
are precursors to the formation
of ozone, the United
States Environmental
Protection Agency (U.S.
EPA) has published
control techniques
guidelines (CTGs) to establish
RACT categories
for certain source categories.
The regulated list was first
released on March 23,
1995,
and includes the
following categories:
paper, film, and
foil coatings, metal furniture
coatings, and large
appliance coatings. In September
of 2007, the
U.S.
EPA
released an update
to the CTGs for paper, film,
and foil 2
coatings;
large appliance
3
coatings;and metal furniture
coatings4.As a result,
Illinois
Environmental
protection Agency (“Illinois
EPA”) is proposing
the
regulations
to
control VOM emissions from these
categories
of sources in the Chicago
and
Metro-East
nonattainment areas (“NAAs”). The
Chicago NAA includes the counties
of Cook,
DuPage, Kane,
Lake, McHenry,
Will, the townships
of Aux Sable and Goose Lake in Grundy
County, and the Oswego
township
in Kendall
County, while the Metro East
NAA includes
Jersey,
Madison,
Monroe,
and St. Clair counties.
The Illinois EPA reviewed
and relied upon the
recommendations contained in
the CTGs to
develop
its proposal to
control
VOM
emissions
from the affected sources.
There are a total of 24
sources affected by
this proposal in the Illinois NAAs. Though
it is difficult to quantify actual
VOM
emissions
reductions from this proposal, the Illinois EPA
estimates
that there will
be
21.45
ton
per year of
reductions in the VOM emissions
at a cost of
$1200.00
per ton of
VOM removed.
The
Illinois EPA believes
that
the
proposed
regulations
are technically feasible
and cost
effective.
6
1.0
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant
to
Section 109 of the CAA’,
and
to protect the public health,
the U.S. EPA revised the
national ambient air
quality standard (“NAAQS”) for
ozone,
effective July 17, 1997. The
U.S.
EPA lowered the
NAAQS for ozone to 0.08 parts per
million from the previous 0.12 parts
per
million. In addition, the time period
used for
measuring compliance was increased
from the
previous 1 hour to 8
hours.
The U.S.
EPA designated
areas that did not meet the NAAQS
for
8-
hour ozone in April
2004.
Tn Illinois,
the Chicago
and the Metro East/St. Louis areas have
been
designated as
moderate ozone nonattainment areas under
the
new NAAQS. Included in the
Chicago NAA are Cook, DuPage, Kane,
Lake,
McHenry, and Will counties,
as well as the Aux
Sable Township and
Goose Lake Township in Grundy
County,
and Oswego Township in
Kendall County.
The Metro East/St. Louis NAA is comprised
of Jersey, Madison, Monroe,
and
St. Clair
counties. The CAA Section
172 requires
that
SIPs for these non-attainment
areas must
include
emission
controls that are economically and technologically
feasible. Emission control
technologies
that meet these criteria are known as reasonably available
control technology
(“RACT”).
Accordingly,
the Illinois EPA is proposing to reduce VOM emissions from
the following
categories:
paper, film, and foil coatings; large appliance coatings;
and
metal furniture
coatings.
These three
emission categories have
been designated as
“Consumer and Commercial Products,
Group III” by
the
U.S.
EPA.
Pursuant
to
CAA
Section 183(e)(3)(C),
U.S.
EPA determined
that
CTGs “will
be substantially as
effective
as national regulations in reducing emissions
of volatile
organic
compounds
in
ozone national ambient air quality
standard nonattainment areas.” Based
on that
determination,
U.S.
EPA issued final CTGs in
lieu of national regulations for the
affected
categories in
September 2007.
The
U.S.
EPA’s CTG for Paper,
Film,
and Foil
Coatings
2suggests applying
control methods
to
reduce
VOM
emissions for cleaning operations to each
source in which the total actual VOM
emissions from
all paper, film, and foil coating operations
are equal to 15 lb/day or more.
For
coatings,
the CTG
suggests applying control methods
to paper, film, and foil surface
coating
lines
that have
a potential to emit (“PTE”) at least 25 tons
per year (tpy) of VOM, before the
7
consideration of
controls. However, for
sources that have
actual
emissions greater than 15 lb/day
and where no single coating line has the PTE of 25
tpy or more before controls, the CTG
recommends applying only the suggested work practices.
The
U.S.
EPA’s CTG for paper, film,
and
foil
coatings cautions that this category is
not to be confused with the coating
that is
performed on or in-line with any offset lithographic,
screen, letterpress, flexographic,
rotogravure, or
digital printing press, as it is
part of aprinting process and not
a coating process.
The CTGs for large appliance coatings and metal
furniture coatings recommend applying control
methods to sources
in which the total actual
VOM emissions from all related operations
(including cleaning activities) equal 15 lb/day or more,
or an equivalent level (such as
3
tons
per
12-month rolling
period),
before consideration
of controls. This threshold level is deemed
to be
equal to the
evaporation of about 2 gallons of solvent
per day, which is considered an incidental
level that can be expected even in
sources
that utilize low-solvent coatings
(i.e. powder or UV
cure coatings)
3’
4.
8
2.0
PROCESS
DESCRIPTION AND
SOURCE OF EMISSIONS
The
U.S.
EPA’s CTGs contain
information
on various coating processes
and their sources
of
VOM emissions. The
following
discussion is
based on the
U.S.
EPA’s CTG
documents.
2.1
Paper, Film, and Foil
Coatings
Paper, film, and foil coatings
include adhesives
used on tapes and labels, and
are defined as “any
protective,
decorative,
or functional coating applied
on paper, plastic film, or metallic foil
to
make
certain products, including but not limited to, adhesive tapes and
labels, book covers,
post
cards, office copier
paper, drafting paper, or pressure
sensitive tapes”; this includes
coatings
applied
through
saturation or impregnation. Paper,
film, and foil surface coatings can
also be
categorized as
a web coating process, which typically involves the application
of a continuous
layer
of coating across
either a whole or part of the
width of a web substrate to do the following:
1) provide a
covering, finish, or functional or protective layer
to a substrate; 2) saturate
a
substrate for lamination; or 3)
provide adhesion
between two substrates for lamination.
An average coating
line can include a series of one
or
more unwind/feed stations;
one
or
more
coating
applicators; the flash off area (the portion between
two or more consecutive coating
applicators or between
the coating applicator and
the drying oven); one or more
drying
ovens;
and one or
more rewind/cutting stations. Many varying kinds of coating
applicators
can exist,
and
they
include: rotogravure, reverse roll, slot die, knife, flexography,
Mayer rod, dip and
squeeze,
and
extrusion/calendering. Further
details regarding these types of
coating applicators
can be found
in the paper, film,
and foil coatings
CTG2.In addition, the
cleaning activities that
occur at
associated
facilities are carried out
to eliminate coating residue or
other unwanted
materials from
equipment related to coating operations; this is done
via spray gun cleaning
and
other
such
related cleaning operations.
Sources of
VOM
emissions arise from the
evaporation of volatile components
of the coatings
and
cleaning
materials.
These can mostly be from the process
of
coating
application/flash-off
9
coating curing/drying, and cleaning. About
90%
of
the VOM in the coatings
is evaporated in
the
drying ovens.
2
2.2
Large Appliance
Coatings
Large appliance coatings include paints, topcoats, basecoats,
primers, enamels,
sealants, caulks,
inks, adhesives, and maskants
that
are used in the manufacture
of large appliances (such as
washers
and dryers).
Coatings
from large appliances are defined
as any protective, decorative,
or
functional coating applied onto the surface of large appliances
or
to the constituent
metal parts.
Some examples that
are listed
as large appliances include residential
and commercial washers,
dryers,
ranges, refrigerators, freezers, water heaters, dishwashers,
trash compactors,
air
conditioners, and other similar products. The employment of
coatings is an important
part in the
making of large appliances, as they protect the
metal on the large appliances
from rusting away
by allowing
resistance to such factors as
moisture, heat, detergent,
and even outdoor elements.
They
must
be durable and have superb adhesion
properties
to prevent
chipping or peeling as
well.
Typical coating methods include air atomized spraying, airless
spraying, electrostatic
spraying,
dip coating, electrodeposition,
and flow
coating. In air atomized
spraying, compressed air
is
used
to provide transfer efficiencies of up to
40%,
while airless
spraying employs an airless
pump system to
force the coating through a nozzle
that is made to atomize
the coating for a
transfer efficiency
of between 50 to 60 percent.
For electrostatic spraying,
an air or an airless
gun
system can be created to
magnetize
the coating to the substrate
and achieve approximately
85%
transfer efficiency. A
dip coating
process involves dipping
a part into a tank that contains
the coating to have
a transfer efficiency of close
to 85%. Electrodeposition
is just a type of
dip
coating
method that
uses
an
electric field
to aid the placement
of a waterborne coating to a
substrate. Finally,
flow coating is a technique
that applies a coating
directly onto a substrate
without
atomizing the coating and usually creates
85% transfer efficiency.
Further details
concerning
the
process for large
appliance
coatings are in the
U.S.
EPA’s CTG
for large
appliance
coatings
3.
10
Primary
sources
of
VOM
emissions
evolve
from
the coating
application
(prime,
single
or topcoat
application)/flash-off
and drying/curing
of the
coatings,
and
from mixing
and/or
thinning.
In
addition,
cleaning
materials
are
another
source of
VOM emissions.
Cleaning
can involve
different
types
of
chemical
washes,
including
solvent cleaning,
acid
washing,
phosphate
washing,
and de-ionized
water
washing—solvent
cleaning
and
wetting
oil treatments
are
the
highest
source
of VOM
emissions.
Cleaning
materials
can also
be used
in cleaning
coating
equipment
and
to
touch
up the final
products,
and are typically
VOM
solvents,
such
as methyl
ethyl
ketone
(MEK)
and
toluene,
but
there has
been
a greater
trend
towards
using
alcohol
and
water-based
cleaners
3
.
2.3
Metal
Furniture
Coatings
Metal
furniture
coatings include
paints
used
in
the
manufacture
of
furniture
made
in whole
or
part
by metal
(such
as
chairs and
tables).
Metal
furniture
coating
is defined
as “any
protective,
decorative
or
functional
coating
applied onto
the surface
of any
metal furniture
or any
metal
part
which
will be assembled
with
other
metal,
wood,
fabric, plastic
or
glass
parts
to form metal
furniture.”
Examples
of metal
furniture
include
tables,
chairs,
waste baskets,
beds,
desks,
lockers,
benches,
shelving,
file cabinets,
lamps,
and
room dividers
that
are
made in whole
or
in
part
by
metal. Similar
to large
appliance
coatings,
the
coatings on
metal furniture
protect
them
from
rusting
away
by
allowing
resistance
to such elements
as
moisture,
heat, detergent,
and
even
outdoor
factors,
and
they
must
be durable
and
have superb
adhesion
properties
to prevent
chipping
or peeling
as well.
Four main
processes
are
involved
in the
creation of
metal furniture
manufacturing:
1) raw
material preparation;
2) surface
preparation;
3)
coating
and adhesive
application
operations;
and
4)
assembly.
Surface
preparation,
coating
application
operations,
and cleaning
activities
use
VOM-containing
compounds
(e.g. coatings,
thinners,
and/or
cleaning
materials).
Prior to
a
metal
furniture
part or
product
being
coated, its
surface must
be
cleaned;
this
consists
of
the following
processing
steps:
1)
alkaline
or acid
cleaning,
2) water
rinse,
3) iron
phosphate
treatment,
4)
water rinse,
and
5)
pre-treatment
and/or
another final
water
rinse. After
this
stage,
the surface
coating application
occurs,
followed
by
curing
or
a drying
of the coating;
the coating
could
either
11
be a liquid or powder, and can be
sprayed
or dipped.
Next, the final unit is
assembled and
packaged for shipment.
Similar to
the large
appliance coatings, the
primary source
of VOM emissions can
occur from the
evaporation
of the
volatile contents of the
coatings and cleaning
materials. Most notably, the
VOM emissions from coating
applications
arise when
solvent vanishes from the coating
as it is
being placed onto the part, or even when solvents
are being
used during the final cleaning
process. It is important to state that the more
efficient that a coating
application technique is
in
enabling a transfer of coatings to
the
metal furniture part,
the volume of coatings needed
during
productions decreases, which thereby results
in lower VOM emissions
4.
12
3.0
TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY OF
CONTROLS
After reviewing the
original
1977 CTG, all other associated
revisions thereafter, and
current state
and local regulations, the
U.S.
EPA proposed
emission
limits
and work practices to control
VOM
emissions
from the coating categories involved
in Consumer and
Commercial Products,
Group
III: Paper, Film, and
Foil
Coatings, Large
Appliance Coatings,
and Metal Furniture Coatings.
3.1
Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings
Common control techniques for reducing VOM emissions
from paper,
film, and foil
surface
coatings
include
pollution prevention measures
and the operation of emission
capture and
add-on
systems.
Product substitution/reformulation is
commonly used as a pollution
prevention measure
in the paper, film, and foil surface coating industry to
decrease VOM emissions from
coatings.
Lower VOM content coatings, such as waterbome
and higher solids contents
coatings,
or
coatings with no solvents may be used to reduce
VOM emissions by reducing or
eliminating
the
organic solvent present
in the coatings. Coating
manufacturers
have developed and are
continuing to develop waterbome
and other
alternative coating
formulations that replace
conventional organic solvent-based coatings. These
coating are available for
a
number
of
applications. However, for some products, the currently
available
low-VOM coatings
or coatings
with no solvent
do not meet the performance requirements
of some paper,
film, and foil surface
coating operations.
When low-VOM
content coatings cannot
be used due to performance
requirements calling
for
higher VOM content coatings, VOM
emissions
from paper,
film, and foil surface coating
operations can be
reduced
by
the use of capture
systems in conjunction
with add-on control
systems that
either destroy or recover the VOM in the
exhaust streams. Add-on
control devices
reduce the
amount of VOM emissions by either destruction
or recovery with
or without recycling
of
VOM collected from
the exhaust streams.
Two categories
of add-on control devices
are
typically used by paper,
film, and foil industry:
combustion
(thermal or catalytic oxidation)
and
recovery (adsorption and condensation). In general,
oxidation and adsorption
systems
can
achieve
destruction
efficiency of greater than
95 percent as
applied to surface coating application
13
operations with high and constant concentration
of VOM. Detailed information
on these control
technologies
are contained
in the U.S. EPA’s
CTG for paper, film, and foil coatings
2.
Pollution prevention is the most common
emission control technique for
reducing VOM
emissions from cleaning materials. Reducing
the composite vapor pressure
or VOM content of
the cleaning material used, either
by
substitution
or formulation, is one
of the pollution
prevention measures that is used to reduce VOM emissions
from cleaning operations.
However,
little information is available regarding the types of low-VOM
or
VOM-free cleaning
materials
that
could
be used in the paper, film, and
foil
surface coating industry.
The
CTG
for paper, film, and foil surface
coatings
recommended an overall
VOM
control
efficiency
of
90%
for each coating line that has
a
potential
to emit at least 25
tpy of VOM from
coatings before the
consideration
of add-on controls. However, as
an alternative to the
90%
overall control efficiency, the U.S. EPA recommends a limit
of
0.20
kg VOM!kg (0.20 lb
VOM/lb) solids applied
or
0.067
kg VOMIkg (0.067 lb VOM/lb)
coatings applied
for pressure
sensitive
tape and label surface coating lines, and a limit of 0.40
kg VOM/kg
(0.40
lb
VOM/lb)
solids
applied or 0.08 kg VOM/kg (0.08 lb VOM/lb) coating
applied for all other paper, film,
and
foil surface coating
lines. Table 1 summarizes
the U.S. EPA’s recommended
RACT limits for
paper, film, and
foil coatings.
These
limits can be met through daily within-line averaging (i.e.
averaging the VOM content
of
materials used on an individual surface coating line each day).
The
U.S.
EPA
recommends work practices to decrease VOM
emissions for cleaning
materials,
but not the
application
of add-on controls (add-on controls would
be
too costly because the
area
to
be controlled is
very large, and would thereby require
a
large
volume of air
to be captured and
directed to a
control device). Typically, VOM emissions for
cleaning materials come
from the
mixing,
storage, and
handling
of
cleaning materials
and cleaning-related
waste
materials. In
order to minimize the
emissions, the following work
practices can be
employed: (1) place all
VOM-containing
cleaning
materials
in
closed
containers; (2) guarantee
that mixing
and storage
containers used
for VOM-containing materials are kept closed
at all times except when
14
Table
1: RACT
Limits
for Paper,
Film, and
Foil
Coatings
RACT
Limits
Paper,
Film, and Foil
Surface
Units
Pressure Sensitive
Tape
Coating
(does not include
and Label Surface Coating
Pressure
Sensitive
Tape and
Label
Surface Coating)
Emission Reduction
90
90
(%)
kg VOM/kg solids (lb
0.20
0.40
VOM/lb solids)
kg VOM/kg
coatings
0.067
0.08
(lb VOM/ib
coatings)
depositing or removing
these materials; (3)
curtail spills
of VOM-containing
cleaning materials;
(4) transfer
VOM-containing
cleaning materials
from
one location
to another
in closed containers
or pipes;
and (5)
reduce VOM emissions
from
cleaning
of storage,
mixing, and conveying
equipment.
3.2
Large
Appliance
Coatings
Several kinds
of controls are available
to industry
to control VOM
emissions
from coatings
and
the
cleaning
materials
associated
with
this category. These
available
controls
for
coatings
include
pollution prevention
measures, such as
product
substitution/reformulation
and work
practices,
and emission
capture
and add-on control
systems.
The
same
types
of available
controls
would also apply
to cleaning materials
associated
with large
appliance coatings
operations.
For
product
substitution/reformulation,
affected
sources
can
use waterborne
coatings,
higher
solids
solvent-borne coatings,
and
powder coatings
to reduce
VOM
emissions
through
decreasing
or even
eliminating the
amount of organic
solvent
in
the coatings.
Several coating
15
manufacturers provide
such environmentally-friendly
product substitution/reformulation
methods,
which are easily convertible from
the original solvent-borne
coatings, and are generally
available. In addition to this, work practices
may be used to reduce
VOM emissions from
coatings during paint mixing,
paint storage, and paint transfer
operations. These work practices
include keeping coating
supply lines, holding tanks, coating
storage containers, or any such
fluid
handling equipment well maintained to prevent spills, leaks,
or other such problems
that would
aggravate the amount of VOM released into
the air. During mixing
operations, mixing vessels
should
have a top that prevents VOM emissions
from being released
into the air during the
agitation process,
and mixed
coatings and solvents should
be stored in closed containers
when
they
are
not being combined.
Emission
capture
and
add-on control systems
can also be used
to reduce VOM emissions
from
large appliance coating operations. The most common
method for the destruction
of VOM from
coatings is thermal oxidation, and can include the following:
(1) direct,
gas-fired, thermal
recuperative
oxidation; (2) direct, gas-fired thermal regenerative
oxidation;
(3)
direct,
electrically
heated, thermal
regenerative oxidation; (4) direct,
electrically heated,
catalytic oxidation;
and (5)
direct, gas-fired,
catalytic oxidation. These add-on
control systems can
achieve a VOM control
efficiency between 80%
and
98%,
with thermal
oxidation
being
the more preferred method
for
VOM destruction.
More information concerning
these add-on control
systems available for
large
appliance
coatings can be
found in the
U.S.
EPA’s
CTG
for large
appliance
coatings
3.
Available control options for VOM emissions from cleaning
materials associated with
large
appliance coating
operations are similar to those for
coating operations,
including pollution
prevention
measures
(e.g. product substitution/reformulation
and
work practices) and emission
capture/add-on
control systems. For product substitution/reformulation,
alternative
cleaners,
such as alcohols and
citrus-based cleaners, can
be employed to restrict
VOM emissions from
cleaning operations.
An example of a work practice
procedure
that can
be utilized to further
reduce
VOM emissions from cleaning
operations
associated
with large appliance coatings
operations
involves
nozzle maintenance, which
is an integral part
of any metal pre-treatment
system—an improperly maintained
nozzle
can lower spray
impact
and can distort spray
systems,
and
thereby
reduce
the cleaning efficiency. In addition,
storing cleaning
materials in covered
16
containers, minimizing
the
use of
necessary cleaning
materials,
and
collecting and
placing
solvent-filled
cleaning materials
in closed
containers
after
they are used
can further prevent
the
vaporization
of VOM into the
air.
Along
with
the
pollution
prevention
measures
listed
above, affected
sources can
use emission
capture
and add-on control systems
to control
VOM emissions
from cleaning
operations for
large
appliance
coatings.
These include
carbon adsorption
units or
oxidizers.
The
U.S.
EPA believes
that such recommendations
will
reduce VOM
emissions
from this
category
by approximately
30%,
which
is a
potential reduction
of about
1,000 tons of
VOM from
the NAA facilities. The
U.S. EPA
assumes that
most facilities will
use low-VOM
coating
materials,
due to
economic and/or
financial reasons.
3.2.1
Emission Limits
Based on
Low-VOM Coatings
Tables 2 and 3 list
the suggested
U.S.
EPA emission
limits
based
on low-VOM
coatings for one-
component and multi-component
general purpose
coatings,
as well as
specific emission
limits for
certain specialty
coatings (both are
separated into
baked
and
air-dried
coatings).
Table 2
specifies limits in
terms of mass of
VOM per volume
of coating
(excluding
water
and exempt
compounds,
as
applied) and Table
3 specifies
the equivalent
limits
in
tenns of mass of
VOM per
volume
of solids,
as applied.
3.2.2 Optional
Add-On
Controls
for Coating
Operations
If a product’s
performance requirements
or other
needs require
the use of
higher-VOM
materials
than
those
listed in
Tables 2 or 3, an affected
source
could
choose
to use
add-on
control
equipment to meet a 90%
overall control
efficiency. Add-on
devices
include
oxidizers
and
solvent
recovery
systems that, when
joined with
their
VOM
capture
systems,
would
allow
for the
source to
achieve
the
90%
overall
control efficiency.
An affected
facility could
also
combine
17
Table 2: Mass of
VOM
per Volume of Coating
for Large Appliance
Coatings
Coating type
Baked
Air
Dried
kg/I
lb/gal
kg/i
lb/gal
General, One Component
0.275
2.3
0.275
2.3
General,
Multi-Component
0.275
2.3
0.340
2.8
Extreme High Gloss
0.3 60
3.0
0.340
2.8
Extreme Performance
0.360
3.0
0.420
3.5
Heat Resistant
0.360
3.0
0.420
3.5
Metallic
0.420
3.5
0.420
3.5
Pretreatment Coatings
0.420
3.5
0.420
3.5
Solar Absorbent
0.360
3.0
0.420
3.5
18
Table 3: Mass of VOM
per Volume
of Solids
for Large Appliance
Coatings
Coating
type
Baked
Air
Dried
kg/i
lb/gal
kg/i
lb/gal
General, One
Component
0.40
3.3
0.40
3.3
General,
Multi-Component
0.40
3.3
0.55
4.5
Extreme High Gloss
0.61
5.1
0.55
4.5
Extreme Performance
0.61
5.1
0.80
6.7
Heat Resistant
0.61
5.1
0.80
6.7
Metallic
0.80
6.7
0.80
6.7
Pretreatment
Coatings
0.80
6.7
0.80
6.7
Solar
Absorbent
0.61
5.1
0.80
6.7
coatings
and
add-on
control equipment
on a coating
unit to
meet
the recommended
mass of
VOM limits,
as listed
in
Tables 2 or 3.
19
3.2.3 Work Practices for Coating
Operations and Cleaning Materials
Similar to
the control
options
for cleaning materials
operations from the paper, film,
and foil
coatings subcategory, the
U.S.
EPA is recommending
work practices
to minimize
VOM
emissions from
large appliance coatings as well.
These work practices are applicable
to solvent
storage, mixing operations, and handling
operations
for coatings, thinners,
cleaning materials,
and waste materials, and include the following: (1)
store all VOM-containing
coatings, thinners,
and
cleaning materials in closed containers; (2) minimize
spills of VOM-containing coatings,
thinners, and cleaning materials; (3) clean up
spills immediately; (4) convey
any coatings,
thinners, and cleaning materials in closed containers
or pipes; (5) close mixing vessels
that
contain VOM coatings and other materials
except
when specifically in use;
and (5) minimize
usage of solvents during cleaning of storage, mixing,
and conveying of equipment.
3.3
Metal
Furniture
Coatings
Similar to the available controls for the prior two
subcategories, two basic emission
control
techniques are available to reduce VOM emissions from metal
furniture coatings: pollution
prevention
measures, and emission capture and
add-on control systems, pollution
prevention
being the preferred technique used by most metal furniture
coating sources.
A source may choose to substitute higher-solvent coatings with either
powder coatings,
waterborne coatings,
higher
solids coatings, UV coatings, electrocoatings,
and autophoretic
coatings,
all of which have little or no solvents. Several
manufacturers are slowly veering
away
from
using conventional organic solvent-borne coatings,
and are replacing them with
waterbome
and
powder coating formulations. It is important to note that the
currently available low-VOM
coatings
or coatings with no solvents do not meet the performance
requirements
of some metal
furniture and cannot be viable options for the production
of these products. Additionally,
utilizing
more
effective
application equipment
can reduce VOM emissions.
Conventional air
atomized
application
systems have typical transfer
efficiencies between
25-40% using high
atomizing
air
pressure. More modern technologies
include electrostatic and
high volume/low
pressure (HVLP) spray equipment, which can attain far greater
transfer efficiencies, which
20
results in less dependence on
VOM-containing materials. More information on these
types of
spray applications can be found in the CTG for
metal
furniture
coatings
4.
Along with pollution prevention
measures, VOM emissions from metal furniture
coating
operations
can
be reduced via the
use of capture systems and add-on control devices,
which
either destroy or recover the VOM in the exhaust stream. Examples
of capture systems include
such simple components as hoods
and enclosures, which collect solvent-filled air
from process
vents
(such
as spray booths or bake oven vents) and/or fugitive emissions
from the flash-off area,
and direct it to a control device. Control devices for
the metal furniture coating industry include
combustion (thermal or catalytic oxidation) and recovery
(adsorption and absorption). These
types
of add-on control systems can reach
a control efficiency of 95% or greater.
Recovered
solvents that cannot be reused can either
be sold back to the solvent supplier or an independent
firm that specializes in reclaiming contaminated solvents,
or used as a fuel in coating boilers
or
coating ovens; the latter option would require
burner modifications to burn solvent, since
many
coating ovens and boilers are gas-fired. Other control
technologies,
such as condensation,
biodegradation, and
liv oxidation,
are all applicable for VOM emissions
control from metal
furniture
coating operations, but are currently not widely used.
Pollution prevention is the most widely used emission
control technique for decreasing VOM
emissions from
cleaning materials related to
metal furniture coating operations. An
affected
source can reduce the composite VOM vapor pressure or
VOM
content of the cleaning material
being
used
by
using low-VOM or VOM-free cleaning materials.
In addition, work practice
procedures can be
employed
to
reduce VOM
emissions from cleaning material
processes,
and
they
include the following:
•
Cover mixing and storage vessels for
VOM-containing cleaning materials,
and
cleaning waste materials except
when adding, removing,
or mixing contents;
• Use closed containers or pipes to store and
convey VOM-containing cleaning
and
cleaning waste
materials;
• Minimize spills of VOM-containing cleaning
and cleaning waste materials;
and
• Minimize VOM emissions during
cleaning operations.
21
3.3.1 Emission
Limits Based on
Low-VOM
Coatings
The emission limits
set forth in the
U.S. EPA’s CTG
on metal
furniture
coatings are for
one-
component
and
multi-component
general purpose
coatings,
as well as for certain
specialty
coatings, all
of which
are
separated by baked and
air-dried
coatings.
Tables 4 and
5 show VOM
limits
for metal furniture
coatings in mass
per
volume
of coating and equivalent
limits
in
mass
per volume
of solids, respectively.
These
VOM content limits
can be met through
daily within-coating
unit averaging
(averaging
the
VOM content of
materials
used
on a single
surface coating
unit each day).
In
addition,
the
U.S.
EPA is recommending
that affected
sources utilize
one
or more
of the following
application
methods: electrostatic
application,
high volume
low pressure
(HVLP) spray, flow
coat,
roller
coat, dip coat
including electro-deposition,
or other
such coating application
method
that is
capable
of achieving a transfer
efficiency
equivalent
or better
than
that
which
is achieved
by
HVLP spraying.
However, the
U.S.
EPA is recommending
that
the following
kinds of coatings
and
coating operations
be
exempt
from the VOM content
limits
stated
above: stencil coatings,
safety-induced
coatings, solid-film
lubricants,
electric-insulating
and thermal-conducting
coatings,
touch-up
and repair
coatings, and coating
application
utilizing
hand-held aerosol
cans.
The limits set
forth in
Tables 4
and
5
are
the
same VOM
content
limits
set forth for large
appliance
coatings.
3.3.2
Add-On Controls
for Coating Operations
The
optional add-on
controls
for
coating
operations
related
to
metal furniture production
are the
same as
those for
large appliance coatings:
-a 90%
overall control
efficiency
for
add-on control
equipment
(including
oxidizers
and
solvent
recovery systems;
or
-a
combination
of coatings and
add-on control
equipment on a coating
unit to meet
the
recommended
mass
of VOM per volume
of
coating
solids limits.
22
Table
4:
Mass
of
VOM
per Volume
of
Coating
(excluding
water
and
exempt
compounds
for
Metal
Furniture
Coatings
Coating
type
Baked
Air
Dried
kg/I
lb/gal
kg/i
lb/gal
General,
One Component
0.275
2.3
0.275
2.3
General,
Multi-Component
0.275
2.3
0.340
2.8
Extreme
High
Gloss
0.360
3.0
0.340
2.8
Extreme
Performance
0.360
3.0
0.420
3.5
Heat
Resistant
0.360
3.0
0.420
3.5
Metallic
0.420
3.5
0.420
3.5
Pretreatment
Coatings
0.420
3.5
0.420
3.5
Solar
Absorbent
0.360
3.0
0.420
3.5
23
Table 5: Mass of VOM per Volume
of
Solids
(as applied)
for Metal Furniture Coatings
Coating
type
Baked
Air Dried
kg/i
lb/gal
kg/i
lb/gal
General, One Component
0.40
3.3
0.40
3.3
General, Multi-Component
0.40
3.3
0.55
4.5
Extreme High Gloss
0.61
5.1
0.55
4.5
Extreme Performance
0.61
5.1
0.80
6.7
Heat Resistant
0.61
5.1
0.80
6.7
Metallic
0.80
6.7
0.80
6.7
Pretreatment Coatings
0.80
6.7
0.80
6.7
Solar Absorbent
0.61
5.1
0.80
6.7
3.3.3
Work Practices for Coating Operations and Cleaning
Materials
To further
reduce VOM emissions from metal furniture
surface coating-related activities,
the
CTG
recommends
instilling the
following work
practices:
(1) store
all VOM-containing
coatings,
thinners, and coating-related waste
materials in
closed containers;
(2) ensure that mixing and
24
storage
containers
used for VOM-containing
coatings,
thinners,
and coating-related
waste
materials
are kept closed
at all times except
when
depositing
or removing
these materials;
(3)
minimize
spills of VOM-containing
coatings,
thinners,
and
coating-related
waste materials;
and
(4) convey
VOM-containing
coatings,
thinners,
and
coating-related
waste
materials
from one
location
to another
in
closed containers
or pipes. While
work practices
are
extremely
favorable
to the
goal of reducing VOM
emissions, it is important
to note
that
VOM
reductions may
not be
quantifiable.
As for cleaning
materials associated
with metal
furniture coating
operations, the
U.S. EPA’s
CTG
simply recommends
work practices such
as: (1) closed
container
storage
of all VOM
containing cleaning
materials and used
shop
towels;
(2)
ensure that
mixing
and
storage
containers
used
for VOM-containing
cleaning
materials
remain
closed at all times
except when
depositing or
removing such materials;
(3) minimize
spills of VOM-containing
cleaning
materials;
(4) convey VOM-containing
cleaning
materials
from one area
to another
in
closed
containers
or pipes; and (5) minimize
VOM
emissions
from
cleaning of storage,
mixing and
conveying equipment.
25
4.0
ECONOMIC
REASONABLENESS
The
Illinois
EPA relied on
the U.S. EPA’s economic
analysis
included
in
the respective CTGs
to
determine the economic
costs and impacts
associated
with
the control
of VOM emissions
from
paper, film, and foil coatings;
metal furniture
coatings;
and
large appliance
coatings operations
in
Illinois’
NAAs.
4.1
Paper, Film,
and Foil Coatings
In order to calculate
the approximate
costs that
are associated with
the add-on control
recommendation
set forth
in the paper, film,
and foil
coatings CTG, the
U.S.
EPA assumed
that
about
47%
of the
facilities in the 2002
National
Emissions
Inventory
(NET) database (119
facilities) were
currently in compliance
with
the
2002
National
Emission Standards
for
Hazardous Air
Pollutants
(NESHAP).
Based on
the average number
of
coating lines
per facility
classified in Table
2
of the
CTG
that
had
a potential
to emit
25
tpy of VOM
or greater
before
consideration
of add-on controls,
the total
annual
cost was
about
$24.5
million
per year.
Furthermore,
if facilities that exceed
the emission
thresholds and that
are
located in
NAAs
utilized the 90%
emission
reduction, it would
create an emission
reduction
20,800 tpy.
With this
in
mind,
the
CTG states that the
expected
cost-effectiveness
of implementing
the CTG’s
approaches to
control
VOM emissions
would be about
$1,200
per
ton.
For cleaning materials
associated
with this category,
the
U.S. EPA believes
that the
application
of add-on
controls
would be a costly
alternative for decreasing
VOM emissions
because the
area
that would
be
controlled
has
a large volume
of air that would
be captured and directed
to a control
device.
2
4.2
Large Appliance
Coatings
When suggesting
control
options, the
U.S.
EPA
assumed
that all facilities
would choose to
use a
low-VOM
coating
materials alternative.
This was
made
for two
reasons: 1) complying
low
VOM coating
materials
are already available
on the
market at
a cost
that is not much
greater than
the
cost
of coating
materials
with
higher
VOM
contents; and 2)
the use of add-on
controls
to
reduce
VOM
emissions from average
spray coating
operations would
be
a more costly
26
alternative.
By
applying the emission limits
based on low-VOM coatings,
the 90% overall
control efficiency, as well as utilizing the work practices
associated with cleaning materials
from
such operations, the
U.S.
EPA believes that the cost-effectiveness
for
a medium sized
facility
that
uses
waterborne prime and higher solids
topcoat would be approximately
$425
per ton in
2006
dollars.
However, the 2002 NESHAP
presented a control
cost of
$480,000
for
approximately 1,000 tons of HAP reduction from 74 facilities
anticipated to be subject to
the rule
($480 per ton of
HAP reduced in 2006
dollars). Therefore,
for the
purpose of establishing cost-
effectiveness for VOM
emissions
control from applicable NAA
sources, the
U.S.
EPA
approximates a cost of about
$500
per ton of VOM reduced,
and
a total annual
cost of the 1,000
tpy
of emissions reduction to be $500,000.
4.3
Metal Furniture Coatings
Using the
2002 NET database to estimate the number
of metal furniture manufacturing
sources,
the U.S.
EPA approximated that there were a total of 456
metal furniture facilities
nationally.
Out of these 456
facilities, it was estimated
that there were about
289 facilities in ozone
NAAs,
and that 143 of those
289
emitted
at
or beyond the 15 lb/day
VOM emissions threshold.
Similar
to the CTG for
large
appliance coatings, the
U.S.
EPA
assumed that
all facilities
would
choose to
use a
low-VOM coating materials alternative. This
was made for two reasons: 1)
complying
low-VOM coating
materials are already available
on the market at a
cost
that is not much greater
than the cost
of coating materials with higher VOM contents;
and 2) the use of add-on
controls
to
reduce VOM
emissions from average spray coating operations
would be a more costly
alternative.
In
accordance with studies that
were carried out for
the
2003 NESHAP, the cost
to
implement the control
alternatives
from the U.S. EPA’s CTG
for this
category averaged across
all
sizes of facilities
was
as
high as
$1,670
per facility. For the 143
facilities mentioned
previously that
exceeded the 15 lb/day applicability threshold,
total annual costs were
estimated
to
be
approximately $240,500; such an implementation
will result in a
35%
(1,200
tpy) reduction
in
VOM
emissions from
metal furniture coatings.
U.S.
EPA calculated
the cost effectiveness
to
be about
$200
per ton in VOM
emissions
reduction.
27
5.0
EXISTING AND
PROPOSED
REGULATIONS
The
Illinois EPA reviewed
the control
techniques recommended
in the
CTGs to control
VOM
emissions
from coating operations.
These recommendations
were
then
compared
to current
Illinois EPA
regulations
and the corresponding
Illinois EPA inventory
to determine
if proposed
changes
needed to be made,
such that they would
be mirrored
with
U.S. EPA
requirements.
5.1
EXISTING REGULATIONS
Currently, Illinois
EPA
regulates
VOM emissions
from
various
surface
coating
operations
including paper,
film, and foil; metal furniture;
and
large appliance
coating operations
in the
Illinois’
NAAs (Chicago
and
Metro-East).
5.1.1
Paper, Film and
Foil Coatings
Parts
218
and
219 of 35 Ill. Adm.
Code5contain
specific regulations
for controlling
VOM
emissions
from
paper, film, and foil
coatings.
VOM content
limitations are prescribed
for paper
coating
operations
that emit 15 lb/day
or more of
VOM
from all associated
coating operations.
Table 6 shows the
existing
VOM content limits
for paper
coatings.
Table 6: Existing VOM
Content
Limits for Paper
Coatings
Compliance
Date
Limitation
kg/i
lb/gal
Prior
to March
15, 1996
0.35
2.9
OnandAfierMarchl5,1996
0.28
2.3
Alternatively,
sources may install
and operate
VOM
capture
and
control
systems
that provide
81%
reduction
in overall
VOM emissions,
and the control
device
must
achieve
90%
efficiency
28
(control devices
include afterburner,
carbon adsorption,
condensation,
or absorption
scrubber
system).
5.1.2 Large
Appliance
Coatings
Specific
regulations for large
appliance coatings
are located
in Subpart F
of 35 Ill.
Administrative
Code Parts 218 and
219. The applicable
threshold
for the total
actual
uncontrolled
VOM emissions
from all large appliance
coating
operations
is 15
lbs/day
or more.
Furthermore, Illinois
EPA
does
not distinguish between
different
coating
types,
and
instead
divides between
a baked and
air-dried coating
operation
that
has a compliance
date before
or
after March 15,
1996. Table 7 shows
the existing
VOM content limits
for large appliance
coatings in Illinois’
NAAs.
Table 7: Existing
VOM Content Limits
for Large
Compliance
date
Baked
Air
Dried
kg/i
lb/gal kg/i
lb/gal
Until
March
15, 1996
0.34
2.8
0.34
2.8
OnandAfterMarchl5,1996
0.28
2.3
0.34
2.8
As an alternative
to compliant
coatings, the rule
provides an
add-on control option
that requires
a
coating line to
be equipped with a
capture system
and control
device that provides
an
81%
reduction in
overall VOM
emissions,
and
the control
device
(i.e. afterburner,
carbon
adsorption,
condensation,
or
absorption
scrubber
system) achieves
a
90% efficiency.
29
5.1.3 Metal Furniture Coatings
Regulations for metal furniture coating operations are
very similar to the regulations for large
appliance coatings, except with regard
to
the
VOM emission limits for
baked or air-dried metal
furniture coatings until March 15, 1996:
Table 8: Existing Metal Furniture
Coatings Limits
Compliance
date
Baked
Air Dried
kg/i lb/gal
kg/i lb/gal
Until March 15, 1996
0.36
3.0
0.36
3.0
On and
AfterMarch 15, 1996 0.28
2.3
0.34
2.8
5.2
PROPOSED REGULATIONS
Illinois EPA
is proposing amendments to Parts 218 and 219
of 35 Ill. Adm.
Code
to
control
VOM
emissions from paper coating, metal furniture coating,
and large appliance coating. The
control
requirements are consistent with the recommendations
contained
in the 2007 CTGs.
The
proposed compliance date
to comply with
the
regulations
is on and
after May 1, 2011.
5.2.1
Paper, Film and Foil Coatings
Illinois EPA is not
proposing any change to
the applicability threshold
of 15 lb/day or more for
control
requirements for paper coating. However, illinois EPA
is proposing to specify the
VOM
content
limits
of paper coating in lb (kg) of VOM per lb (kg)
of solids and equivalent VOM
limits in kg (lb)
of VOM per kg (lb) of coating. Except
for pressure sensitive
tape and label
surface coating,
the VOM limits are equivalent to the existing
VOM limits for
paper coating.
Table
9
shows the
proposed VOM limits for paper
coatings.
30
Table 9:
Proposed
Limits
for
Paper
Coatings
Units
Proposed
Limits
Pressure
Sensitive
Paper, Film,
and Foil Coatings
(not
Tape and Label
including
Pressure
Sensitive
Tape and
Surface
Coatings
Label)
kg VOMIkg
solids
0.20
0.40
(lb VOM/ib solids)
kg VOM/kg
coatings
0.067
0.08
(lb
VOM/ib coatings)
Affected
sources may
use
add on capture and control
systems
to comply
with the VOM content
limits
of
the
coatings.
Illinois EPA is
proposing to
increase
the
overall control
efficiency
standards to 90 percent
from the existing 81
percent
overall
control
efficiency
of the add-on
capture
and control systems.
In addition, the Illinois
EPA is proposing
to
add
Section
218.218:
Work Practice Standards
for
Paper Coatings to
include the
following
standards
for cleaning
materials from
applicable
sources
related
to
this
category on and after
May
1,
2011:
1)
Store
all VOM-containing
cleaning materials
in closed
containers;
2)
Ensure
that
mixing and storage
containers
used for VOM-containing
materials
are kept closed
at
all
times
except
when
depositing or removing
such materials;
3)
Minimize
spills
of VOM-containing
cleaning
materials;
4)
Convey
VOM-containing
cleaning materials
from one
location
to another
in closed
containers
or pipes;
and
5)
Minimize
VOM
emissions
from
the cleaning
of storage, mixing,
and
conveying equipment.
31
5.2.2 Large Appliance Coatings
The Illinois
EPA is not
proposing
any change
to the applicability
requirement of 15 lb
VOM/day
or more for the control requirements for large appliance
coatings. The proposed
regulations
specify separate VOM content limits for one-component
and multi-component general
purpose
coatings. Also, the proposed regulations provide specific
emission limits for
certain specialty
coatings. For each of these coating
types,
Illinois
EPA is proposing
separate emission limits
for
baked and
air-dried
coatings.
Depending
on the type of coating,
the VOM limits vary from 2.3
lb/gal (0.275 kg/i) to 3.5 lb/gal (0.42 kg/l). Table 2 of
section 3.2.1 contains the various
emission limits expressed in terms of mass of VOM per volume
of coating for large appliance
coatings that Illinois EPA is proposing and Table 3
of
section
3.2.1 contains the equivalent
emission
limits expressed in mass/volume of solids.
The proposed
regulations require the use of one
or more of the following
application methods:
electrostatic
application, HVLP spray, flow coat, roller
coat, dip coat including
electrodeposition,
or other coating application method,
with
approval of the Illinois
EPA, capable of achieving
a
transfer efficiency
equivalent or better than achieved
by HVLP
spraying.
In
addition, the proposed
regulations
provide
that stencil coatings,
safety-indicating coatings,
solid-film
lubricants,
electric-insulating
and thermal-conducting
coatings, touch-up and repair
coatings, or
coating applications utilizing hand-held
aerosol cans are exempt from
VOM content
limits.
Affected sources may
use add-on capture and
control systems
to comply with the VOM content
limits
of the coatings. Illinois EPA
is proposing
to increase the
overall control efficiency
standard to 90 percent
from the existing 81 percent
overall control efficiency.
Also, the
Illinois EPA is recommending the following
work practice standards for
large
appliance
coatings:
1)
Store all VOM-containing coatings, thinners,
coating-related
waste
materials,
cleaning materials,
and used shop towels
in closed containers;
32
2)
Ensure that
mixing and storage containers
used for VOM-containing
coatings,
thinners, coating-related
waste
materials, and cleaning
materials
are
kept closed at all times
except
when depositing or removing
such
materials;
3)
Minimize
spills of VOM-containing
coatings, thinners, coating-related
waste
materials,
and cleaning materials,
and clean up spills immediately;
4)
Convey
VOM-containing coatings, thinners,
coating-related waste
materials,
and cleaning materials from
one location to another in
closed
containers
or pipes; and
5)
Minimize VOM emissions from
the cleaning of
storage, mixing, and
conveying equipment.
5.2.3 Metal
Furniture
Coatings
The proposed applicability, VOM limits, add-on
control
device efficiency,
and work practices
requirements
for
metal furniture
coatings
are identical to
the proposed regulations
for large
appliance coatings.
33
6.0
AFFECTED SOURCES and VOM
EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS
Illinois
EPA
reviewed
its
emissions inventory
database
to identify any potentially
affected
sources of the proposed regulations. There are a
total of 22 sources in the
Chicago NAA and two
in the Metro-East NAA potentially affected by the
proposed regulations.
Out of
22
sources in
the Chicago NAA, 16 sources have paper coating
operations and six have
metal furniture coating
operations. Two sources in the Metro-East NAA have
paper
coating operations. There
are no
large
appliance coaters in either the Chicago or the
Metro-East NAAs.
The Illinois EPA reviewed the 2005 VOM emissions
inventory
and determined
that seven
sources in the Chicago NAA comply with the
paper coating regulations
by using add-on capture
and control systems. All other affected sources use
compliant coatings to comply
with the
regulations.
The
Illinois EPA believes that
no new add-on capture
and
control systems will
be
installed to meet the proposed
regulations.
Rather, the Illinois
EPA expects
that affected sources
will continue to use
compliant
coatings, or
upgrade their existing add-on
capture and control
systems
to meet the proposed VOM emission limits.
Table 10 shows the estimated VOM
emissions reductions and Table 11 lists the affected
sources.
Table 10: VOM Emission Reductions in the Chicago
and Metro-East NAAs
Number of Sources
2005
VOM Emissions
Category
Non-attainment areas
Total
Reduction
Chicago
Metro-East
(TPY)
(TPY)
Paper, Film and Foil Coatings
16
2
109.83
21.45
Large Appliance
Coatings
None
None
0
0
Metal
Furniture Coatings
6
None
89.4
0
TOTAL
22
2
199.23
21.45
34
Table 11: List of Affected Sources in the
Chicago and Metro-East
NAAs
I.D. Number
Name of the
Facility
O31O3OACM
Replogle Globes Corp.
031186AHL
Mecalux
USA Inc
O31600BPK
Edsal
Mfg Co Inc
031600EDF
Marvel Group
Inc
O31600GCL
Dentalez Alabama Corp
111O15ABO
Knaack EEC
O31O15AAM
Alcan Packaging
Food and Tobacco
Inc
031 O3OABQ
Lithographic
Industries
031 O51AFP
Microcosm
O31O81ACU
Tapecoat
Company Inc
031198ABP
Sun Process Converting
Co
031198ABW
Stimsonite Corp
031288ABA
Federal-Mogul Corp
O31600BGU
Color Communication
Inc
O31600BUF
Chicago Steel container
Corp
043005AJS
Roliprint
Packaging Product
043005AMQ
Pres-on
Tape and Gasket Corp
089035AAK
Olon Industries
Inc
089438ADW
Printpack Inc
097005ABB
Nu-way Speaker
Products Inc
111O1OAAT
Flexicon Inc
163O1OAEZ
Weyerhaeuser
Co
163806AAA
Hexacomb
Corp
197050AAK
Panduit
Corp
35
7.0
REFERENCES
1.
The
Clean
Air Act as amended
in 1990
(42
U.S.C.
Section
7401
et
seq.).
2.
U.S.
EPA. “control
Technique
Guidelines for
Paper, Film, and Foil
Coatings”.
EPA
453LR07-003,
September
2007.
3.
U.S.
EPA. “Control
Technique
Guidelines for
Large Appliance
Coatings”. EPA-453/R-
07-004, September
2007.
4. U.S. EPA.
“Control Technique
Guidelines
for Metal Furniture
Coatings”. EPA-453/R-
07-005,
September 2007.
36