ECEVED
CLERK’S
OFFICE
UNITED
A
MUNICIPALCITY
OF
CORPORATION,YORKVILLE,
)
)
AUG
2
82009
)
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS
Complainant,
)
Pollution
Control
BOard
)
PCB No.
08-96
v.
)
(Enforcement-
Land,
Air,
Water)
)
HAMMAN
FARMS,
)
)
Respondents.
)
NOTICE
OF FILING
TO:
SEE
ATTACHED
SERVICE
LIST
PLEASE
TAKE
NOTICE
that
on August
28,
2009,
we electronically
filed
with
the
Clerk
of the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board,
Complainant’s
Answer
to
Affirmative
Defenses
to
Count
IV,
a copy
of which
is attached
hereto
and
hereby
served
upon
you.
Dated:
August
28,
2009
Respectfully
submitted,
UNITED
CITY
OF
YORKVILLE
/Jiidd
/lt
One
of Its
Attorneys
Thomas
G.
Gardiner
Michelle
M.
LaGrotta
GARDINER KOCH
WESIBERG
&
WRONA
53
W.
Jackson
Blvd.,
Suite
950
Chicago,
IL
60604
312-362-0000
Atty
ID:
29637
THIS
FILING
IS SUBMITTED
ON RECYCLED
PAPER
CERTIFICATE
OF
SERVICE
I Michelle
M.
LaGrotta,
the
undersigned
certify
that
on August
28, 2009,
1 have
served
the
attached
COMPLAINANT’S
ANSWER
TO AFFIRMATIVE
DEFENSES
TO
COUNT
IV, upon:
Mr.
John T. Therriault,
Assistant
Clerk
Illinois
Pollution Control
Board
100 West
Randolph
Street
James
R. Thompson
Center,
Suite
11-500
Chicago,
Illinois 6060
1-3218
(via
hand delivery)
Bradley
P. Halloran
Hearing Officer
Illinois
Pollution Control
Board
James
R. Thompson
Center,
Ste.
11-500
100 W Randolph
Street
Chicago,
IL
60601
(via hand
delivery)
Charles
F. Heisten
Nicola
A. Nelson
Hinshaw
&
Culbertson
100
Park
Avenue
P.O.
Box 1389
Rockford,
IL 61105-1389
(via
email
to:
NNelsonhinshavlaw.com
and
CHelsten@hinshawlaw.com,
and
U.S.
Mail)
/LL2
Michelle
M. LaGrotta
BEFORE THE
ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOAEcEV
CLERK$S
OFF1EP
UNITED
A
MUNICIPAL
CITY
OF
CORPORATION,
YORKVILLE,
)
)
AU
6282009
Complainant,
)
STATE
U
IOfl
OFIWN
Control
Board
IS
)
PCB
No.
08-96
v.
)
(Enforcement-
Land,
Air,
Water)
)
HAMMAN
FARMS,
)
)
Respondents.
)
COMPLAINANT’S
ANSWER
TO
AFFIRMATIVE
DEFENSES
TO
COUNT
IV
NOW
COMES
the
Complainant,
UNITED
CITY
OF
YORKVILLE,
by
and
through
its
attorneys,
GARDINER
KOCH WEISBERG
&
WRONA,
and
for
its
ANSWER
TO
AFFIRMATIVE
DEFENSES
TO
COUNT
IV,
it
states
as
follows:
Affirmative
Defense Number
1
Complainant
is
precluded
from
recovery
because
Hamman
Farms’
lawful
application
of
landscape waste
under
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(q),
as
specifically approved
by
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency,
prohibits
any
finding
that
Hamman
Farms has
engaged
in
water
pollution
under
Section
12
of the
Act.
ANSWER:
Affirmative
Defense
Number
1
calls
for
legal
conclusion
as
to which
answer
is neither
necessary
nor
appropriate
under
the
law
so
plaintiff
moves
to
strike
this
affirmative defense.
Should the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
find
that
Affirmative
Defense
Number
1
addresses
a
factual
allegation,
Complainant
denies
Affirmative
Defense
Number I.
Affirmative
Defense
Number
2
COmplainant
is
precluded
from
recovery
under
the doctrine
of
laches,
due
to
their
unreasonable
delay
in
bringing
an
action
for
reliet which
has
prejudiced
the
rights
of
Hamman
Farms.
ANSWER:
Affirmative
Defense
Number
2
calls
for
legal
conclusion
as
to
which
answer
is
neither
necessary
nor
appropriate
under
the
law
so
plaintiff
moves
to
strike
this
affirmative
defense.
Should
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
find
that
Affirmative
Defense
Number
2
addresses
a
factual
allegation,
Complainant
denies
Affirmative
Defense
Number
2.
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
UNITED
CITY
OF
YORKVILLE,
respectfully
requests
that
Respondent,
HAMMAN
FARMS’
AFFIRMATIVE
DEFENSES
TO
COUNT
IV,
be
stricken
and
for
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
just
and
equitable.
Respectfully
submitted,
UNITED
CITY
OF
YORKVILLE,
Complainant,
By:
/1”ttcd4
44
One
of
its
Attorneys
Dated:
August
28,
2009
Thomas
G.
Gardiner
Kenneth
M.
Battle
Michelle
M.
LaGrotta
Gardiner
Koch
&
Weisberg
53
W
Jackson
Blvd.,
Ste.
950
Chicago,
IL
60604
(312) 362-0000