FROM
(THU)AUQ
13
2OO
8:OOST.
7’5OOOOOlO
P
2
Br)NGE
R
CEL)
August
12, 2009
AUG
3
2009
Mr. Timothy
Fox,
Hearing
Officer
1
NO’s
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
BOard
James
R.
Thompson
Center
(
4_
100
W.
Randolph
‘—‘‘
“
e
1
Suite
11-500
Chicago,
Illinois
60601
RE:
Rulemaking
R2006-22,
In
the
Matter
of:
NOx
Trading
Program:
Amendments to 35111.
Adrn.
Code
Part
217;
Response
to Motions
by
the
Illinois
Environmental Regulatory
Group
Mr.
Fox:
I am
writing
on behalf
of Bunge
North
America,
Inc.
(Bunge)
in
response
to
the Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board’s
(“Board”)
August
6,
2009
Order
requesting
responses
to
the
Illinois
Environmental
Regulatory
Group’s
(“IERG”)
Motion
for Emergency
Rule and
Motion
for
Expedited
Action
on
IERG’s
Alternative
Proposal
(collectively
“Motions”).
Bunge
supports
the
Motions
and
urges
the
Board
to grant
approval
for the
Motions.
Please
consider
the
following
in
ruling
on
the Motions:
1.
Bunge
believes
that
it is in
the best
interest
of
business
in
Illinois
to
adopt
the
emergency
rule and
alternative
proposal
described
in
the
Motions
that
require
NOx
allowances
to
be
distributed
for the
2009
ozone
season,
as well
as
subsequent
control
periods.
2.
Bunge
is
an owner/operator
of a facility
in
Danville,
IL
that is potentially
subject
to
proposed
Subpart
U.
(35
Ill.
Admin.
Code
Part
217.Subpart
U).
3.
IEPA
inadvertently
excluded
the
Bunge
facility
in Danville
from
the
NOx
SIP
Call
budget
trading
program
when Subpart
U
was
originally
established,
In
a letter
from
Laurel
Kroack
of the
IEPA,
dated
August
17,
2006,
IEPA
petitioned
US
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(EPA)
and
the
Clean
Air
Markets
Division
(CAMD)
requesting
additional
allowances
for
Bunge
and that
upon
receipt
of
these
additional
allowances,
IEPA
would
amend
Subpart
U
to
include
the
Bunge
facility
in
Danville
in
the
rule.
FRON
(THU)AUQ 1
008
8:OQIST.
7:5eHo.. 7500000510
P
3
4.
Bunge
upgraded its continuous
emissions
monitoring system
(CEMS)
and
its
data
acquisition
and handling
system (DAHS)
to Part 75 standards
in preparation
of
being
included
in
the
NOx
SIP
Call budget
trading
program.
Unfortunately,
the US
EPA
never
awarded
the requested
allowances,
and IEPA
never amended
Subpart
U.
5.
Therefore,
Bunge
has not
received allocations
of
NOx
allowances
for
the
2009
ozone
season,
nor for any
subsequent
years.
However,
Bunge is included
ill the rule
proposed
by
IERG
and
would
receive NOx
allowances
under the proposed
rule.
6.
Bunge
is concerned
that, through
no fault of its
own, potential
legal liability
may
exist
for Bunge by
being subject
to the federal rule
while
being excluded from
Illinois
state
rule.
Bunge appreciates
the
opportunity
to provide this
response. In light
of the
above, we request
that
the
Board
grant
IERG’s
Motion
for
Emergency
Rule
in
order to require
that 2009
NOx
allowances be
distributed
to
impacted
sources,
and grant
IERG’s Motion
for Expedited
Action
on IERG’s
Alternative
Proposal
in order to bring
NOx SIP
Call
budget
units into
the
CAIR
NOx
Ozone
Season Trading
Program
for the 2010
control period and
beyond.
Respectfully
submitted,
Bunge
North
America,
Inc.
Loren
Polak
Director
of
Environmental
Management
Bunge North
America, Inc.