08/12/2009
WED
11:48
FAX
217
2536925
DUKE
ENERGY
OF
TUSCOLA
Ij001/002
DUKE
ENERGY
GENERATION
Duke
SERVICES,
INC.
Ener
®
625
East
US
Highway
36
Tuscola,
IL
61953-7507
Generation
Services
217
253
6922
RECEiVED
217253
6925
fax
CLERKS
OFFICE
August
11,2009
AUG
12
2009
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS
Mr.
Timothy
Fox,
Hearing
Officer
PoIlUtlOfl
Control
Board
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
James
R.
Thompson
Center
7
C’
100
W.
Randolph
Suite
11-500
Chicago,
illinois
60601
RE:
Rulemaking
R2006-22,
In
the
Matter
of:
NOx
Trading
Program:
Amendments
to
35
Iii.
Adm.
Code
Part
217;
Response
to
Motions
by
the
illinois
Environmental
Regulatory
Group
Mr.
Fox:
1
am
writing
on
behalf
of
SUEZ
-
DEGS
of
Tuscola,
LLC
in
response
to
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board’s
(“Board”)
August
6,
2009
Order
requesting
responses
to
the
Illinois
Environmental
Regulatory
Group’s
(“IERG”)
Motion
for
Emergency
Rule
and
Motion
for
Expedited
Action
on
IERO’s
Alternative
Proposal
(collectively
“Motions”).
We
would
like
to
offer
our
support
for
the
Motions,
and
urge
the
Board
to
consider
the
following
in
ruling
on
the
Motions:
1.
We
believe
it
is
in
the
best
interest
of
business
in
Illinois
to
adopt
rules,
such
as
the
emergency
rule
and
alternative
proposal
described
in
the
Motions,
that
require
NOx
allowances
to
be
distributed
for
the
2009
ozone
season,
as
well
as
subsequent
control
periods.
2.
We
are
an
owner/operator
of
budget
unit(s)
subject
to
the
current
Subpart
U.
35
Ill.
Admin.
Code
Part
217.Subpart
U.
3.
We
have
not
received
allocations
of
NOx
allowances
for
the
2009
ozone
season,
nor
for
any
subsequent
years.
4.
We
understand
that
the
current
version
of
Subpart
U
is
a
valid
and
enforceable
regulation
in
illinois
that
requires
subject
sources
to
hold
NOx
allowances
for
each
ton
of
NOx
emitted
during
the
ozone
season
by
November
30
of
the
applicable
year.
Pagel
www.
duke-energy.
corn
08/12/2009
WED
1149
FAX
217
2536925
DUKE
ENERGY OF
TUSCOLA
I002/002
5.
We understand
that the
USEPA is
no
longer
issuing
allowances
for
the
NOx
Budget
Trading
Program,
as would
be
required
to satisf’
the
above described
requirement.
6.
We
understand
that
NOx
allowances
could
potentially
be
obtained
through the
purchase
of Clean
Air Interstate
Rule
(“CAIR”)
NOx allowances,
although
we are
uncertain
whether
those allowances
would
be
legally
sufficient
to
satisfy
the
Subpart
U
requirement
to
hold
NOx
SIP
Call
allowances.
Nor, even
if
sufficient,
could
we
demonstrate
compliance
with the
requirement,
due
to
our
inability
to obtain
CAIR
compliance
accounts
from
the USEPA
Clean
Air
Markets Division
(“CAMD”),
absent
a
federally
approved
trading
program
in Illinois.
7.
We are
concerned
that we,
through
no
fault
of
our own,
may
be
in
violation
of
both the
law [and/or]
our Clean
Air Act
Permit
Program
(“CAAPP”)
permits,
if
inunediate
action is not
taken to
remedy
the above
described
circumstances.
SUEZ
- DEGS
of Tuscola,
LLC
appreciates
the
opportunity
to
provide this
response.
In
light of the
above,
we request
that the
Board
grant IERG’s
Motion
for
Emergency
Rule
in order
to
require
that 2009
NOx allowances
be distributed
to
impacted
sources,
and
grant
IERG’s
Motion
for Expedited
Action
on
IERG’s
Alternative
Proposal
in order
to
bring
NOx
SIP Call
budget
units into
the
CAIR NOx
Ozone
Season
Trading
Program
for the
2010
control period
and
beyond.
Respectfully
Submitted,
6
4d
X
Robert L.
Denton Jr.
VP
of
Operations
SUEZ
- DEGS
of
Tuscola,
LLC
Page2