1. BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
      2. Petitioner 1 PCB 04-215
      3. 1 Trade Secret Appeal
      4. NOTICE OF FILING
      5. BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
      6. 1 Trade Secret Appeal
      7. Preliminary Statement
      8. Facts
      9. Argument
      10. Conclusion
      11. BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
      12. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
Commonwealth Edison Company,
1
Petitioner
1
PCB 04-215
1
Trade Secret Appeal
v.
1
1
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
1
Respondent
1
NOTICE OF FILING
To:
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk
Byron F. Taylor
Illinois Pollution Control Board
Roshna Balasubramanian
100 West Randolph
Sidley Austin Brown
&
Wood LLP
Suite 1 1-500
Bank One Plaza
Chicago, Illinois 60601
10 S.
Dearborn
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Brad
Halloran
Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100 West Randolph
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Please take notice that today we have filed with the Office of the Clerk of the
Pollution Control Board Respondent's Memorandum in Opposition to Commonwealth
Edison Company's Motion to Extend the Stay of PCB 04-215. A copy is herewith served
upon the assigned Hearing Officer and the attorneys for the Petitioner, Commonwealth
Edison Company.
Dated: Chicago, Illinois
December 20,2006
LISA
MADIGAN, Attorney General of the
State of Illinois
MATTHEW
DUNN, Chief, Environmental Enforcement1
Asbestos Litigation Division
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, DECEMBER 20, 2006
* * * * * PC #1 * * * * *

BY:
Ann
y
Alexander, Assistant Attorney General and
Environmental Counsel
Paula Becker Wheeler, Assistant Attorney General
188 West Randolph Street, Suite 2000
Chicago, Illinois 60601
312-814-3772
3 12-8 14-2347 (fax)
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, DECEMBER 20, 2006
* * * * * PC #1 * * * * *

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
Commonwealth Edison Company,
1
Petitioner
)
PCB 04-215
1
Trade Secret Appeal
v.
)
)
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
1
Respondent
)
MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO COMMONWEALTH
EDISON'S MOTION TO EXTEND THE STAY OF PCB 04-215
Preliminary Statement
Respondent Illinois Environmental Protection Agency ("IEPA") submits this
memorandum in opposition to the motion by Petitioner Commonwealth Edison
("ComEd") to
extend the now-expired stay of PCB 04-215. The Board, citing the "strong policy interest"
favoring disclosure of environmental compliance information, expressed disinclination in its
August decision .to further continue the stay "absent especially compelling circumstances." No
such circumstances are present here.
Facts
Respondent accepts CornEd's statement of facts solely with respect to the chronology of
events set forth in it, and not with respect to any qualitative descriptions of those events.
Argument
In its initial decision granting a stay of these proceedings over Respondent's objection,
the Board stated, "The Board is
mindhl of the strong policy interest, evidenced in the [Illinois
Environmental Protection] Act, favoring public disclosure of environmental compliance
information, particularly emission data." Commonwealth Edison Co. v. IEPA, PCB 04-2 15
(April
6, 2006), at 8. The Board nonetheless granted a short-term 3 month stay, on the
reasoning that
"[tlhe risk of prejudice to IEPA from a stay of PCB 04-1 85 would be greatly
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, DECEMBER 20, 2006
* * * * * PC #1 * * * * *

diminished
. . .
by limiting the duration of the stay to a date-certain in the near future, rather than
simply granting a stay 'until resolution of the federal process' as Midwest requests."
a.
Prior to expiration of the 3-month stay, IEPA acceded to an agreed motion for a short-
term extension of the stay based on new information it had received from
USEPA Region 5 that
USEPA was likely to issue a final decision within a few months. The Board, in granting the
agreed motion, cited its earlier statement that the Act favors public disclosure of environmental
compliance information, particularly emission data, and stated, "The Board therefore cautions
the parties that, absent especially compelling circumstances, the Board may be disinclined to
further extend the stay." Commonwealth Edison Co. v. IEPA, PCB 04-21
5 (August 17,2006), at
3.
No such "especially compelling
circumstances" have emerged to warrant further
continuation of the stay. Notwithstanding its stated expectations at the time of the agreed
motion,
USEPA has not yet issued a decision on the pending Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) request, nor stated any date certain by which it will do so.
In support of its motion,
Petitioner cites only the fact that
USEPA has, more than two and a half years after receiving the
initial FOIA request, "has retained an economic consulting firm as a contractor and is or will be
asking the contractor to review
ComEd7s CBI materials." (Petitioner's memorandum at
8)
USEPA has told ComEd that report from the newly-hired consultant "may be available to
USEPA for use in its determination process as early as January 2007," with such determinate
process to follow in an unspecified time
frame.
a.
These vague statements cannot, by any stretch, be considered "especially compelling
circumstances" justifying continuation of the Board's temporary stay. IEPA, in the interest of
comity and efficiency, was willing once to give
USEPA the opportunity to promptly resolve this
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, DECEMBER 20, 2006
* * * * * PC #1 * * * * *

matter and potentially alleviate the need for parallel proceedings. But at this juncture, with no
end to
USEPA's decisionmaking process in sight, a continued stay would contravene the "strong
policy interest
. . .
favoring public disclosure of environmental compliance information," and
perpetrate the prejudice that the Board sought to alleviate by granting a short-term rather than
indefinite stay.
Conclusion
For the foregoing reasons, IEPA respectfully requests that ComEd's motion to extend the
stay of PCB 04-21
5 be denied.
Dated: Chicago, Illinois
December 20,2006
Respecthlly submitted,
LISA
MADIGAN, Attoniey General of the
State of Illinois
MATTHEW
DUNN, Chief, Environmental
Enforcement1
Asbestos Litigation Division
BY:
Ann Alexander, Assistant Attorney General and
Environmental Counsel
Paula Becker Wheeler, Assistant Attorney
General
188 West Randolph Street, Suite 2001
Chicago, Illinois 6060
1
3 12-8 14-3772
3 12-8 14-2347
(fax)
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, DECEMBER 20, 2006
* * * * * PC #1 * * * * *

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
Commonwealth Edison Company,
1
Petitioner
1
PCB
04-215
1
Trade Secret Appeal
v.
1
1
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
1
Respondent
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that I did on the 2oth day of December, 2006 send by First Class
Mail, with postage thereon
hlly paid and deposited into the possession of the United
States Postal Service, a true and correct copy of the following instruments entitled Notice
of Filing and Memorandum in Opposition to Commonwealth Edison Company's Motion
to Extend the Stay of PCB 04-2 15, to:
Dorothy
Gunn, Clerk
Byron F. Taylor
Illinois Pollution Control Board
Roshna Balasubramanian
100 West Randolph
Sidley Austin Brown
&
Wood LLP
Suite 11-500
Bank One Plaza
Chicago, Illinois 60601
1 0
S
.
Dearborn
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Brad
Halloran
Hearing Officer
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100 West Randolph
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Dated: Chicago, Illinois
December 20,2006
LISA
MADIGAN, Attorney General of the
State of Illinois
MATTHEW
DUNN, Chief, Environmental Enforcement/
Asbestos Litigation Division
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, DECEMBER 20, 2006
* * * * * PC #1 * * * * *

ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, DECEMBER 20, 2006
* * * * * PC #1 * * * * *

Back to top