2—I4-c:6:4:o~pM:
    217744
    711
    RECE~VED
    CLERK’S OFFICE
    TN.E ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    FEB 142005
    PAUL and DONNA FREDRICKSON,
    )
    STATE OF ILLINOIS
    husband and wife
    )
    Pollution Control Board
    CompIain~nts
    )
    )
    V.
    )
    PCB04-19
    Jeff Grelyak,
    )
    Respondent.
    )
    NOTICE OF FILING
    PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have today filed with the Office of the Clerk of the Pollution
    Control Board Respondent’s Motion for Extension of Time. Said Motion is directed to Hearing
    Officer Bradley P. Halloran.
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I, the undersigned, certify that I have today served Respondent’s Motion for Extension of Time
    to the entities listed below by telefax to (312) 814-3669 and by placing said documents in
    envelopes with proper postage affixed and by depositing said envelopes in a U.S. Postal
    Service receptacle in Springfield, Illinois. Said envelopes being addressed to the following:
    Illinois PoJIution Control Board
    Attention: Clerk
    100 W. Randolph Street
    Jeremy W. Shaw, Esq.
    James R. Thompson Center
    40 Brink Street
    Suite 11-500
    Crystal Lake, Illinois 60014
    Chicago, Illinois 60601
    An additional copy of the document was included in the envelope addressed to the Clerk of the
    PCB, which copy is to be given to Hearing Officer Halloran.
    Date: 14 February 2005
    George W. Tin kham,
    attorney for Respondent
    ARDC reg. # 2836149
    1119
    S. 6~Street
    Springfield, IL 62703
    (217) 523-8300
    2—14—05: 4:01PM
    2177441711 ;~ 2
    THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    RECE~V~D
    CLERK’S OFFICE
    PAUL and DONNA FREDRICKSON,
    )
    FEB 142005
    husband and wife
    )
    STATEOFIWNO1S
    Complainants
    )
    pollution Control Board
    v.
    )
    PCB04-19
    Jeff Grelyak,
    Respondent.
    MOTION FOR EXTENSIQN OF TIME
    COMES NOW, Respondent by his attorney George W. Tinkham, and asks that he be granted
    an extension of time to file his Motion for Summary Judgment. I support of this Motion,
    Respondent states as follows:
    1 Hearing Officer Halloran entered an order in this matter on 27 January 2005 directing that
    Respondent’s motion for summary judgment is clue on or before
    14
    February 2005.
    2. Shortly after that Order, Respondent submitted a Second Request to Admit to Complainant.
    3. Counsel for Complainant communicated to Respondent’s lawyer that the response to the
    request to admit was anticipated to be made in less than the 28 days allowed by Illinois
    Pollution Control Board Procedural Rule 100.818(a).
    4. Counsel has not yet received the response to the second set of requests to admit.
    5. The response to the second set of requests to admit is needed before a Motion for
    Summary Judgment can be made.
    6. The purpose of this Motion is not to cause delay,
    7, The granting of this Motion will not cause hardship on either party.
    8. Granting this Motion may shorten and expedite the proceedings by allowing at least a partial
    judgment on the pleadings.
    NOW, THEREFORE, RESPONDENT asks that he be granted three (3) business clays from the
    time that he receives a response to his second set of requests to admit to submit his motion for
    summary judgment in this matter. If a date certain for such deadlineis to be set, Respondent
    asks that the date be Monday, 9 March 2005. Respondent further asks that all other deadlines
    —
    in th is matter be extended accordingly.
    Respectfully submitted,
    Jeffre~.Grelyak, Respondent
    Date: 14 February 2005
    By
    George W. Tinlcham, his attorney
    ARDC # 2836149
    GeorgeW. Tinkham, 1119 South
    6th
    Street, Springfield, IL 62703; (217) 523-8300

    Back to top