BEFORE
THE
ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
Hh
\
F
1\
RECEIVED
Fj
I
J
NOV
241999
STATE
OF
1LLIINOIS
Pollution
Control
Board
(Enforcement)
COMMUNITY
LANDFILL
COMPANY,
INC.,
an
Illinois
corporation,
Respondent.
NOTICE
OF
FILING
TO:
Dorothy
Gunn,
Clerk
Mark
A.
LaRose,
Esq.
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
Mark
A.
LaRose,
Ltd.
James
R.
Thompson
Center
734
North
Wells
Street
100
West
Randolph
Street
Chicago,
IL
60610
Chicago,
IL
60601
John
Knittle
Hearing
Officer
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
100
W.
Randolph
St.
11
th
Floor
Chicago,
IL
60601
PLEASE
TAKE
NOTICE
that
on
November
24,
1999,
I
filed
with
the
Clerk
of
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
Complainant’s
Motion
For
Leave
To
File
Second
Amended
Complaint
and
Second
Amended
Complaint,
a
copy
of
which
is
attached
and
herewith
served
upon
you.
Respectfully
submitted
JAMES
E.
RYAN
Attorney
General
State
of
Illinois
By:__________________
MIKE
MACKO
1
’F
/
Environmental
Bureau
Assistant
Attorney
General
100
West
Randolph
Street,
11th
Flr.
Chicago,
IL
60601
(312)
814-3094
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
ex
rel.
JAMES
E.
RYAN,
Attorney
Generalof
the
State
of
Illinois,
Complainant,
-vs
-
PCB
No.
97-193
THIS
FILING
IS
SUBMITTED
ON
RECYCLED
PAPER
BEFORE
THE
ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
r
ex
rel.
JANES
E.
RYAN,
Attorney
)
A
General
of
the
State
of
Illinois,
)
i
L
i\
\
[I
\
r
r
Complainant,
NOV
24
1999
-vs--
)
PCB
No.
97-193
(Enforcement)
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS
COMMUNITY
LANDFILL
COMPANY,
INC.,
)
Pollution
Control
Board
an
Illinois
corporation,
Respondent.
MOTION
TO
FILE
SECOND
AMENDED
COMPLAINT
NOW
COMES
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
by
JANES
E.
RYAN,
Attorney
General
of
the
State
of
Illinois,
and
moves
this
Honorable
Board
for
leave
to
file
a
Second
Amended
Complaint.
In
support
of
this
motion
Complainant
states
as
follows:
1.
On
May
1,
1997,
Complainant
filed
its
Complaint
against
Respondent
alleging
various
violations
of
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Act
and
the
Pollution
Control
Board
Waste
Disposal
regulations.
2.
Since
the
filing
of
this
action,
additional
matters
have
come
to
the
attention
of
the
Complainant
warranting
the
amendment
of
the
complaint
to
add
additional
violations.
3.
It
is
in
the
interest
of
the
parties
and
the
promotion
of
judicial
economy
to
have
all
of
these
matters
resolved
in
this
currently
pending
action.
WHEREFORE,
Complainant
moves
for
leave
to
file
its
Second
Amended
Complaint.
Respectfully
submitted
JAI’4ES
E.
RYAN
Attorney
General
State
of
Illinois
By:
C7/(
MIKE
MACKOF’,
/
1’
Environmental
Bureau
Assistant
Attorney
General
100
West
Randolph
Street,
11th
Flr.
Chicago,
IL
60601
(312)
814-2381
C:
\MyFi1eS\WPDOCS\CLC\PLEADING\2ZNENDED
CMP
wpd
BEFORE
THE
ILLINOIS
POLLUTION
CONTROL
BOARD
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
)r-
r
n
r
n
p
H
ex
rel.
JAMES
E.
RYAN,
Attorney
)fl
I
a
A
General
of
the
State
of
Illinois,
)I
II
H
Complainant,
:\j
NOv
24
19R9
SThTEOFLL\,
-
vs
-
)
PCB
No.
97-193
pollution
Control
Boar.
(Enforcement)
COMMUNITY
LANDFILL
CO.,
an
Illinois
corporation,
Respondent.
SECOND
AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
ex
rel.
JAMES
E.
RYAN,
Attorney
General
of
the
State
of
Illinois,
on
his
own
motion,
complains
of
Respondent,
COMMUNITY
LANDFILL
CO.,
an
Illinois
Corporation,
as
follows:
COUNT
I
FAILURE
TO
ADEQUATELY
MANAGE
REFUSE
AND
LITTER
1.
This
count
is
brought
on
behalf
of
the
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
by
JAMES
E.
RYAN,
Attorney
General
of
the
State
of
Illinois,
on
his
own
motion,
pursuant
toSection
31
of
the
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Act
(Act”),
415
ILCS
5/31
(1998)
2.
The
Illinois
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(“Illinois
EPA”)
is
an
administrative
agency
established
in
the
executive
branch
of
the
state
government
by
Section
4
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/4
(1998)
and
charged,
inter
alia,
with
the
duty
of
enforcing
the
Act.
3.
At
all
times
relevant
to
this
Complaint,
Respondent,
COMMUNITY
LANDFILL
CO.,
(!!CLC?T),
an
Illinois
corporation,
has
operated
a
sanitary
landfill
located
at
1501
Ashley
Road,
Morris,
Grundy
1
County,
Illinois,
(TTlandfillhI
or
Tlsitefl)
4.
The
landfill
consists
of
approximately
119
acres
within
the
Northwest
1/4
of
Section
2
of
the
Northeast
1/4
of
Section
3,
Township
33
North
Range
7
East,
and
in
the
Southeast
1/4
of
Section
34
and
the
Southwest
1/4
of
Section
35,
Township
34
North
Range
7
East,
all
in
the
Third
Principal
Meridian,
in
Grundy
County,
Illinois.
5.
The
landfill
is
divided
into
two
parcels,
designated
Parcel
A
and
Parcel
B.
6.
Parcel
A
is
approximately
55
acres
in
size
and
is
currently
accepting
waste.
7.
Parcel
B
is
approximately
64
acres
in
size.
8.
Section
3.08
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.08
(1998),
provides
the
following
definition:
“DISPOSAL
T
’
means
the
discharge,
deposit,
injection,
dumping,
spilling,
leaking
or
placing
of
any
waste
or
hazardous
waste
into
or
on
any
land
or
water
or
into
any
well
so
that
such
waste
or
hazardous
waste
or
any
constituent
thereof
may
enter
the
environment
or
be
emitted
into
the
air
or
discharged
into
any
waters,
including
ground
waters.
9.
Section
3.20
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.20
(1998),
provides
the
following
definition:
“LANDSCAPE
WASTE”
means
all
accumulations
of
grass
or
shrubbery,
cuttings,
leaves,
tree
limbs
and
other
materials
accumulated
as
the
result
of
thecare
oflawns,
shrubbery,
vines
and
trees.
10.
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998),
provides
thefollowing
definition:
“PERSON”
is
any
individual,
partnership,
co-partnership,
firm,
company,
limited
liability
company,
corporation,
association,
joint
stock
company,
trust
estate,
political
subdivision,
state
agency,
or
any
other
legal
entity,
or
2
their
legal
representative,
agent
or
assigns.
11.
Section
3.41
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.41
(1998),
provides
the
following
definition:
“SANITARY
LANDFILL”
means
a
facility
permitted
by
the
Agency
for
the
disposal
of
waste
on
land
meeting
the
requirements
of
the
Resource
Conservation
and
Recovery
Act,
P.L.
94-580,
and
regulations
thereunder,
and
without
creating
nuisances
or
hazards
to
public
health
or
safety
by
confining
the
refuse
to
the
smallest
practical
volume
and
covering
it
with
a
layer
of
earth
at
theconclusion
of
each
day’s
operation,
or
by
such
other
methods
and
intervals
as
the
Board
may
provide
by
regulation.
12.
Section
3.53
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.53
(1998),
provides
the
following
definition:
“WASTE”
means
any
garbage,
sludge
from
a
waste
treatment
plant,
or
air
pollution
control
facility
or
other
discarded
material,
including
solid,
liquid,
semi-solid,
or
contained
gaseous
material
resulting
from
industrial,
commercial,
mining
and
agricultural
operations
and
from
community
activities,
but
does
not
include
solid
or
dissolved
material
in
domestic
sewage,
or
solid
or
dissolved
materials
in
irrigation
return
flows,
or
coal
combustion
by-products
as
defined
in
Section
3.94,
or
industrial
discharges
which
are
point
sources
subject
topermits
under
Section
402
of
the
Federal
Water
Pollution
Control
Act,
as
now
or
hereafter
amended,
or
source,
special
nuclear,
or
by-product
materials
as
defined
by
the
Atomic
Energy
Act
of
1954,
as
amended
(68
Stat.
921)
or
any
solid
or
dissolved
material
from
any
facility
subject
to
the
Federal
Surface
Mining
Control
and
Reclamation
Act
of
1977
(P.L.
95-87)
or
the
rules
and
regulations
thereunder
or
any
law
or
rule
or
regulation
adopted
by
the
State
of
Illinois
pursuant
thereto.
13.
Section
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(2)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
*
*
*
d.
Conductany
waste-storage,
waste
treatment,
or
waste
treatment,
or
waste-disposal
operation:
3
*
*
*
2.
In
violation
of
any
regulations
or
standards
adopted
by
the
Board
under
this
Act;
or
*
*
*
14.
on
the
following
dates
the
Illinois
EPA
conducted
an
inspection
of
the
site:
April
7,
1994,
March
22,
1995,
May
22,
1995,
March
5,
1997,
July
28,1998,
November
19,
1998,
March
31,
1999,
May
11,
1999
and
July
20,
1999.
15.
During
the
April
7,
1994,
inspection,
litter
was
observed
in
the
perimeter
drainage
ditch
at
the
southwest
portion
of
Parcel
B
and
on
the
southwest
slope
of
Parcel
B.
16.
During
the
March
22,1995,
inspection,
the
Illinois
EPA
inspector
observed
refuse
in
a
perimeter
ditch
and
in
a
retention
pond
at
the
landfill.
17.
During
the
May
22,1995,
inspection,
the
Illinois
EPA
inspector
observed
refuse
and
litter
in
the
perimeter
ditches.
18.
Also
during
the
May
22,
1995
inspection,
the
Illinois
EPA
inspector
observed
three
eroded
areas
where
leachate
seeps
had
exposed
previously
covered
refuse.
19.
During
the
July
28,
1998
inspection,
there
was
uncovered
waste
from
previous
operating
days
in
parcel
A.
20.
On
November
19,
1998
and
March
31,
1999,
the
landfill
was
accepting
waste,
and
onMarch
31,
1999,
there
was
uncovered
refuse
on
Parcel
B,
and
blowing
uncovered
litter
on
Parcel
A.
21.
On
May
11,
1999,
the
landfill
was
accepting
waste,
and
there
was
uncovered
waste
at
the
site
including
uncovered
bags
of
asbestos
containing
waste
material
(ACWM).
4
22.
On
July
20,
1999,
the
landfill
was
accepting
waste
in
Parcel
A,
and
there
was
uncovered
refuse
on
Parcel
B.
23.
Section
21(o)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(o)
(1998),
provides,
in
pertinent
part,
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
*
*
*
o.
Conduct
a
sanitary
landfill
operation
which
is
required
to
have
a
permit
under
subsection
(d)
of
this
Section
in
a
manner
which
results
in
any
of
the
following
conditions:
1.
refuse
in
standing
or
flowing
waters;
*
*
*
5.
uncovered
refuse
remaining
from
any
previous
operating
day
or
at
the
conclusion
of
any
operation
day,
unless
authorized
by
permit;
*
*
*
12.
failure
to
collect
and
contain
litter
from
the
site
by
the
end
of
each
operating
day.
24.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois,
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998)
25.
Section
807.306
of
the
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
T
s
(HBoardTsTI)
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.306,
provides
as
follows:
All
litter
shall
be
collected
from
the
sanitary
landfill
site
by
the
end
of
each
working
day
and
either
placed
in
the
fill
and
compacted
and
covered
that
day,
or
stored
in
a
covered
container.
26.
Litter
and
refuse
are
waste
as
that
term
is
defined
in
Section
3.53
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.53
(1998)
5
27.
The
site
is
a
sanitary
landfill
that
requires
a
permit
under
Section
21(d)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCW
5/21(d)
(1998)
28.
By
leaving
refuse
in
perimeter
ditches
and
the
retention
pond
on
March
22,
1995,
and
by
leaving
refuse
in
perimeter
ditches
on
May
22,
1995,
Respondent
has
violated
Section
21(o)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(o)
(1)
(1998).
29.
By
allowing
leachate
seeps
to
erode
areas
of
the
landfill
and
expose
previously
covered
refuse,
at
least
on
May
22,
1995,
Respondent
has
violated
Section
21(o)
(5)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(o)
(5)
(1998)
30.
By
allowing
litter
and
refuse
to
remain
exposed,
uncontained,
and
uncovered
around
various
areas
of
the
site
on
April
7,
1994,
March
22,1995,
May
22,
1995,
July
28,
1998,
March
31,
1999,
May
11,
1999
and
July
20,
1999,
the
Respondent
has
violated
Sections
21(o)
(5)
and
(12)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(o)
(5)
and
(12)
(1998),
and
Section
807.306
of
the
Board
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.306
and
thereby,
also
violated
Section
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(2)
(1998)
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
I:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
the
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(2),
21(o)
(1),
(5),
and
(12)
of
the
Act,
and
Section
807.306
of
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code;
6
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Sections
21(d)
(2),
21(o)
(1),
(5)
and
(12),
and
Section
807.306
of
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
its
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
II
FAILURE
TO
PREVENT
OR
CONTROL
LEACHATE
FLOW
1-14.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein
paragraphs
1
through
14
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
14
of
this
Count
II
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
15.
During
the
April
7,
1994,
inspection,
the
Illinois
EPA
inspector
observed
five
leachate
seeps
along
the
northwest
perimeter
of
Parcel
B.
16.
During
the
March
22,
1995,
inspection,
the
Illinois
EPA
inspector
observed
numerous
leachate
seeps
at
the
northwest
perimeter
of
the
landfill.
17.
During
the
May
22,
1995,
inspection,
the
Illinois
EPA
inspector
observed
numerous
leachate
seeps
along
the
north
slope
of
the
landfill
and
in
the
north
perimeter
ditch
which
eventually
drains
into
the
Illinois
River.
7
18.
Section
21(o)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(o)
(1998),
provides,
in
pertinent
part,
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
*
*
*
o.
Conduct
a
sanitary
landfill
operation
which
is
required
to
have
a
permit
under
subsection
(d)
of
this
Section,
in
a
manner
which
results
in
any
of
the
following
conditions:
*
*
*
2.
leachate
flows
entering
waters
of
the
State;
3.
leachate
flows
exiting
the
landfill
confines
(as
determined
by
the
boundaries
established
for
the
landfill
by
a
permit
issued
by
the
Agency);
*
*
*
19.
Section
807.314(e)
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.314(e),
provides
as
follows:
Except
as
otherwise
authorized
in
writing
by
the
Agency,
no
person
shall
cause
or
allow
the
development
or
operation
of
a
sanitary
landfill
which
does
not
provide:
*
*
*
e)
Adequate
measures
to
monitor
and
control
leachate;
20.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois,
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998).
21.
Section
3.56
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.56
(1998),
contains
the
following
definition:
“WATERS”
means
all
accumulations
of
water,
surface
and
underground,
natural
and
artificial,
public
and
private,
or
parts
thereof,
which
are
wholly
or
partially
within,
flow
through,
or
border
upon
the
State.
8
22.
The
Illinois
River
is
a
“water”
of
the
State
of
Illinois,
as
that
term
is
defined
inSection
3.56
of
the
Act.
23.
By
allowing
leachate
seeps
to
exit
the
landfill
boundaries
and
enter
waters
of
the
State,
and
by
failing
to
control
leachate
flow,
Respondent
has
violated
Sections
21(d)
(2),
and
21(o)
(2)
and
(3)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(2)
and
21(o)
(2)
and
(3)
(1998)
,
and
Section
807.314(e)
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.314(e).
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
II:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
Sections
21(d)(2),
21(o)
(2)
and
(3),
and
Section
807.314(e)
of
35
111.
Adm.
Code;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Sections
21(d)
(2),
21(o)
(2)
and
(3),
and
Section
807.314(e)
of
35
111.
Adm.
Code;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
its
9
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
III
FAILURE
TO
PROPERLY
DISPOSE
OF
LANDSCAPE
WASTE
1-13.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
referenceherein
paragraphs
1
through
13
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
13
of
this
Count
III
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
14.
Section
22.22(c)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/22.22(c)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
c.
Beginning
July
1,
1990,
no
owner
or
operator
of
a
sanitary
landfill
shall
accept
landscape
waste
for
final
disposal,
except
that
landscape
waste
separated
from
municipal
waste
may
be
accepted
by
a
sanitary
landfill
if
(1)
the
landfill
provides
and
maintains
for
that
purpose
separate
landscape
waste
composting
facilities
and
composts
all
landscape
waste,
and
(2)
the
composted
waste
is
utilized,
by
the
operators
of
the
landfill
or
by
any
other
person,
as
part
of
the
final
vegetative
cover
for
the
landfill
or
such
other
uses
as
soil
conditioning
material.
15.
on
August
18,
1993
and
April
7,
1994,
the
Illinois
EPA
conducted
inspections
of
the
site.
During
these
inspections,
the
Illinois
EPA
inspector
observed
that
landscape
waste
had
been
deposited
in
the
landfill
area.
16.
On
July
28,
1998,
the
Respondent
was
landfilling
landscape
waste
at
the
site
in
Parcel
A.
17.
By
landfilling
landscape
waste,
Respondent
has
violated
Section
22.22(c)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/22.22(c)
(1998).
WHEREFORE,
Complainant
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
10
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
III:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
Section
22.22(c)
of
the
Act;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Section
22.22(c)
of
the
Act;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
its
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
IV
FAILURE
TO
PROVIDE
AND
MAINTAIN
ADEOUATE
FINANCIAL
ASSURANCE
PURSUANT
TO
THE
APRIL
20,
1993
PERMIT
1-13.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein
paragraphs
1
through
13
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
13
of
this
Count
IV
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
14.
Section
21.1(a)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21.1(a)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
a.
Except
as
provided
in
subsection
(a.5)
no
person
other
than
the
State
of
Illinois,
its
agencies
and
institutions,
or
a
unit
of
local
government
shall
conduct
any
waste
disposal
operation
on
or
after
March
11
1,
1985,
which
requires
a
permit
under
subsection
(d)
of
Section
21
of
this
Act,
unless
such
person
has
posted
with
the
Agency
a
performance
bond
or
other
security
for
the
purpose
of
insuring
closure
of
the
site
and
post-closure
care
in
accordance
with
this
Act
and
regulations
adopted
thereunder.
15.
Section
807.601(a)
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.601(a),
states
as
follows:
No
person
shall
conduct
a
waste
disposal
operation
or
indefinite
storage
operation
which
requires
a
permit
under
Section
21(d)
of
the
Act
unless
such
person
has
provided
financial
assurance
in
accordance
with
this
Subpart.
a)
The
financial
assurance
requirement
does
notapply
to
the
State
of
Illinois,
its
agencies
and
institutions,
or
to
any
unit
of
local
government;
provided,
however,
that
any
other
persons
who
conduct
such
a
waste
disposal
operation
on
a
site
which
may
be
owned
or
operated
by
such
a
government
entity
must
provide
financial
assurance
for
closure
and
post-closure
care
of
the
site.
16.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois,
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998),
and
as
contemplated
by
Section
21.1(a)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21.1(a)
(1998)
17.
Section
807.603(b)
(1)
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.603(b)
(1),
provides
as
follows:
b)
The
operator
must
increase
the
total
amount
of
financial
assurance
so
as
to
equal
the
current
cost
estimate
within
90
days
after
any
of
the
following:
1)
An
increase
in
the
current
cost
estimate;
18.
Item
3
of
Respondent’s
supplemental
permit
dated
April
20,
1993,
provided
that
financial
assurance
was
to
be
maintained
in
an
amount
equal
to
$1,
342,
500.
00
12
19.
Item
3
of
Respondent’s
supplemental
permit
dated
April
20,
1993,
approved
the
Respondent’s
current
cost
estimate
for
$1,342,500.00.
20.
Respondent
failed
to
increase
the
total
amount
of
financial
assurance
to
$1,342,500.00,
within
90
days
after
the
Agency
approved
its
cost
estimate
on
April
20,
1993.
21.
Respondent
provided
a
performance
bond
on
June
20,
1996.
22.
By
failing
to
provide
adequate
financial
assurance
Respondent
has
violated
Section
21.1(a)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21.1(a)
(1998),
and
Section
807.601(a)
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.601(a).
23.
By
failing
to
adequately
increase
the
financial
assurance
amount
by
July
19,
1993
(90
days
after
the
Agency
approved
its
cost
estimate
on
April
20,
1993),
Respondent
has
violated
Section
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(2)
(1998),
and
Section
807.603(b)
(1)
of
the
Board
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.603(b)
(1).
24.
Respondent
was
out
of
compliance
with
Section
21.1(a)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21.1(a)
(1998),
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.601(a)
and
807.603(b)
(1)
from
July
19,
1993
until
June
20,
1996.
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
IV:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
violated
Sections
21(d)
(2)
and
13
W
H
1)
d
<
C)
—
d
a)
<1
tn
(ii
C)
F-
0
Cl)
H-
H-
H-
-C!)-
CD
C)
H-
0
H
Ft
H
l—
l-
Ct
0
<
U]
—)
0
Cl)
H
H-
Cl)
a
H
H-
C)
H
h
H
H
3
Ft
(
CD
l)
H
H
o
U
p.
H
H
i-
H
H-
Cl)
Ft
C)
Cli
C)
Ft
H
H-
<
Cli
I
•
Ft
Ft
H
H-
U]
Cl)
•
H
—
0
CD
C)
H-
—
0
Cl)
J
W
0
3
3
0
Cli
3
0
p.
H
H-
CD
Cl)
C)
—.
Cli
C)
3
—
a
S
t
CD
0
H
C)
(I)
-
a
Cli
•
Cl)
()
H-
H
0
Ft
3
d
Ft
—
—•
0
0
Ft
Ft
CD
CJ
Cli
CD
H
h
j-
a
Cl)
Cli
H
h
CD
()
C)
Ci)
Ft
0
Cli
H-
Cli
Cl)
p.
CD
o
Ft
Ui
‘zj
d
Hi
3’
5
Cl)
H
i
o
c.Q
CD
p.
Cn
CD
Ii
p.
H-
-
Cl)
0
I—
Ft
Ft
H-
Hi
pi
Cl)
CD
[-
H-
H-
Cl)
i
H-
Cfl
a)
C)
H-
Cl)
CD
0
W
l-
3
H
0
I-
C)
3
H-
H-
C)
Ft
3
Ci
Ft
H
Cr)
p.
H
j
Cl)
H
0
CD
‘-<
(P
H-
H
(P
Ft
Ft
3
CD
Cl)
-l
H-
1
()
H
a)
3
13
13’
OH
H-
(P
3
Ft
(P
•
0
Cl)
Cl)
Cli
0
H
Ft
Cl)
Cl)
Cl)
0
Cli
C-
3
•
-
—
CD
H
3
3
3
ZJ
HI
tJ
Cli
C)
a
CD
H
3
C)
—.
p.
CD
13
CD
w
Cl)
p.
H
•
H
Cl)
Ft
W
Ft
H
Q
a
C)
_-.
CD
C)
H
Cli
pi
pi
d
Fj
H-
ty’
H
0
CD
Cl)
C)
(D
Ft
0
Z
0
13
Ft
0
a
0
<1
—
—
3
(P
CD
-,
a)
13
C)
0
Hi
CD
Ft
p.
Ft
13
Cli
13
H-
p.
p.
CD
pi
xjO
0
p.
3
p.
H
H
—
CD
o
d
0
Ft
Ft
C)
l-
H
Ft
[-
Hi
d
13’
0
H
CD
—
CD
p.
CD
—
‘—
13
Cli
H
3
3
3
‘d
Ft
Ft
0
o
Ft
0
t
CD
H
CD
Ft
Ft
CD
0
—
H-
13
o
<
Ft
CD
13
(P
II
13
Ft
0
CI)
H-
3’
h
Cl)
CD
Ft
CD
CD
p.
CD
5
Ft
i-
a
1Q
CD
Ft
H
Hi
Cli
Cl)
0
13
CD
H-
CD
H
HI-<
Ic
H
Hi
0
H
0
H
Ft
3
C)
Ft
0
a
13
13
13
CD
CD
CD
CD
W
H-
0
H-
i
H-
CD
P1
h
Ft
3’
p.
C)
o
Cli
Cl)
•
a
Cl
L
Hi
a
Cl)
a
CD
M
Cli
—:1
a
p.
HH
P1
0
W
H
Cl)
a
p.
CD
13
Fd
H-
1<
Cli
—
o
Hi
0
•
CD
C)
Ht’I
a
CD
Cli
-Cl)-
3’
Cli
H
H
—
Hi
H-
Cli
3
o
o
Q
H-
C)
(-
<
H
H
Cu
H
3
3’
Cli
0
Ft
‘d
H
C)
<1
H-
p.
Cl)
13
P1
H
E
Cl)
(P
I-i
13’
CD
-
H-
Hi
-
—
p.
H
0
Cli
p.
0
I-
ti
CD
3
C)
C)
C)
Ft
a
—
Cu
tl
pi
0
p.
0
C)
H
<
0
P
a
Ft
Cli
CD
‘ti
t
CD
a
Cu
E
Hi
CD
Cl)
CD
Ft
3’
Cli
0
p.
Ft
•
Ft
Cl)
a
p.
Cl)
a
Ft
H
a
C)
H-
13’
a
Ft
H-
p.
Hi
H-
IZJ
Ft
CD
‘XJH
—
C)
0
0
Ft
13’
a
H
H-
CD
CD
H
a
H
a
H
‘<
—
13
CD
CD
Ft
a)
H-
—
a
C)
a
‘
Ft
Ft
tJ
p.
Ft
3
‘tI
Cl)
1I
Hi
0
H-
1
3’
‘-<
CD
13
C)
CD
Cli
13
H-
C)
hI
a
0
hI
CD
CD
H
t
13
p.
a
Ft
0
CD
Cli
13
H
0
I-j
5
p.
5
C)
H
Cli
i
a
Ci)
p.
p.
t:i
0
Ft
H-
Cl)
Cli
0
a
Cli
Cl)
S
H-
:tJ
•
p.
13’
CD
Cli
pi
k<
3
H
Cv
13
13
Ft
CD
Hi
I-
‘d
Ft
(P
H
H
p.
‘-<
Ft
o3
H-
H
CD
CD
0
Cli
Cl)
CD
H
w
j
t-
CD
Hi
p.
‘-1
Cl)
Hi
H
p.
H
0
l-
C)
0
H-
p.
a
CD
Cl)
Hi
0
CD
‘ti
3
d
H-
a
Ft
H-
Hi
I-I
CD
Ft
Ft
Ft
0
H-
Ft
3
13’
H-
H-
hI
H-
H-
13’
0
Ft
CD
Cli
Ft
Ft
0
0
CD
3
CD
3’
Ft
a
13
3
hI
Ft
a
H-
CD
CD
CI)
CD
—
a
H-
•
H
CD
13
pursuant
to
Section
21(d)
of
the
Environmental
Protection
Act
(Act)
(Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1991,
ch.
111
‘A,
par.
1021(d)
[415
ILCS
5/21(d)]
shall
file
an
application
for
a
significant
modification
to
their
permits
for
existing
units,
unless
the
units
will
be
closed
pursuant
to
Subpart
E
within
two
years
of
the
-
effective
date
of
this
Part.
b.
The
owner
or
operator
of
an
existing
unit
shall
submit
information
required
by
35
Iii.
Adm.
Code
812
to
demonstrate
compliance
with
Subpart
B,
Subpart
C
or
Subpart
0
of
this
Part,
whichever
is
applicable.
c.
The
application
shall
be
filed
within
48
months
of
the
effective
date
of
this
Part,
or
at
such
earlier
time
as
the
Agency
shall
specify
in
writing
pursuant
to
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.209
or
813.201(b).
d.
The
application
shall
be
made
pursuant
to
the
procedures
of
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
813.
16.
The
Respondent
failed
to
file
the
required
significant
modification
for
Parcel
B
by
June
15,
1993.
17.
Respondent
finally
filed
the
required
significant
modification
on
August
5,
1996,
pursuant
to
a
prospective
variance
issued
by
the
Board.
18.
By
failing
to
file
the
required
significant
modification
for
Parcel
B
by
June
15,
1993,
the
Respondent
has
violated
Section
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(2)
(1998),
and
Section
814.104
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
111.
Adm.
Code
814.104.
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
V:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
violated
Section
21(d)
(2)
of
15
the
Act
and
Section
814.104
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act
or
Section
814.104
of
the
BoardTs
Waste
Disposal
Regulations;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
its
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
VI
WATER
POLLUTION
1-18.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein,
paragraphs
1
through
18
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
18
of
this
Count
VI
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
19.
During
the
May
22,
1995,
inspection,
the
Illinois
EPA
inspector
observed
leachate
in
the
north
perimeter
ditch
which
eventually
drains
into
the
Illinois
River.
20.
Section
12(a)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/12(a)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
a.
Cause
or
threaten
or
allow
the
discharge
of
any
contaminants
in
any
State
so
as
to
cause
or
tend
to
cause
water
pollution
in
Illinois,
either
alone
or
in
combination
with
matter
from
other
sources,
or
so
as
16
to
violate
regulations
or
standards
adopted
by
the
Pollution
Control
Board
under
this
Act;
21.
Section
807.313
of
the
Board!s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.313,
provides
as
follows:
No
person
shall
cause
or
allow
operation
of
a
sanitary
landfill
so
as
to
cause
or
threaten
or
allow
the
discharge
of
any
contamination
into
the
environment
in
any
State
so
as
to
cause
ortend
to
cause
water
pollution
in
Illinois,
either
alone
or
in
combination
with
matter
from
other
sources,
or
so
as
to
violate
regulations
or
standards
adopted
by
the
Pollution
Control
Board
under
the
Act.
22.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998)
23.
Section
3.06
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.06
(1998),
defines
11
contaminant
as
any
solid,
liquid,
or
gaseous
matter,
any
odor,
or
any
form
of
energy,
from
whatever
source.TT
24.
The
leachate
the
Illinois
EPA
inspector
observed
in
the
north
perimeter
ditch
is
a
contaminant
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.06
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.06
(1998).
25.
Section
3.56
of
the
Act,
416
ILCS
5/3.56
(1998),
defines
waters
as
11
a11
accumulations
of
water,
surface
and
underground,
natural,
and
artificial,
public
and
private,
or
parts
thereof,
which
are
wholly
or
partially
within,
flow
through
or
border
upon
this
State.
26.
The
Illinois
River
into
which
leachate
from
the
north
perimeter
ditch
located
on
the
site
eventually
drains,
is
a
water
of
the
state
of
Illinois
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.56of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.56
(1998)
17
27.
Section
3.55
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5.3/55
(1998),
defines
“water
pollution”
as
follows:
“Water
pollution”
is
such
alteration
of
the
physical,
thermal,
chemical,
biological
or
radioactive
properties
of
any
waters
of
the
State,
or
such
discharge
of
any
contaminant
into
any
waters
of
the
State,
as
will
or
is
likely
to
create
a
nuisance
or
render
such
waters
harmful
or
detrimental
or
injurious
to
public
health,
safety
or
welfare,
or
to
domestic,
commercial,
industrial,
agricultural,
recreational,
or
other
legitimate
usesiT,
or
to
livestock,
wild
animals,
birds,
fish,
or
other
aquatic
life.
28.
Causing
or
allowing
leachate,
a
contaminant,
to
flow
into
the
north
perimeter
ditch
which
eventually
drains
or
discharges
into
the
Illinois
River
constitutes
water
pollution
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.55
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.55
(1998).
29.
By
causing
or
allowing
leachate
to
flow
off-site
to
the
Illinois
River,
Respondenthas
violated
Sections
12(a)
and
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/12(a)
and
21(d)
(2)
(1998),
and
Section
807.313
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.313.
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
VI:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondenthas
violated
Sections
12(a)
and
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act
and
Section
807.313
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
18
violations
of
Sections
12(a)
and
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act
and
Section
807.313
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
its
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
VII
DEPOSITING
OF
WASTE
IN
UNPERMITTED
PORTIONS
OF
A
LANDFILL
1-12.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein,
paragraphs
1
through
12
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
12
of
this
Count
VII
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
13.
On
June
5,
1989,
supplemental
development
permit
number
l989-005-SP
was
issued
to
Respondent
for
the
vertical
expansion
of
Parcel
A
and
Parcel
B.
14.
Supplemental
developmental
permit
number
l989-005-SP
that
was
issued
to
Respondent
on
June
5,
1989,
specifically
incorporated
as
part
of
said
permit,
Respondent’s
final
plans,
specifications,
application
and
supporting
documents
that
were
submitted
by
Respondent
and
approved
by
the
Illinois
EPA.
15.
Respondent’s
supplemental
development
permit
application
19
which
was
incorporated
as
part
of
supplemental
development
permit
number
1989-005-SP
issued
to
Respondent,
provides
the
maximum
elevation
for
the
landfill
as
580
feet
above
mean
sea
level.
16.
Respondent
was
therefore
required
not
to
exceed
the
landfill
elevation
of
580
feet
above
mean
sea
level.
17.
On
August
5,
1996,
Respondent
filed
with
the
Illinois
EPA,
an
application
for
significant
modification
of
parcel
B.
The
application
contained
a
map
which
shows
the
current
condition
of
parcel
B.
18.
The
map
referenced
in
paragraph
17
above,
shows
the
current
elevation
for
parcel
B
to
be
at
least
590
feet
above
mean
sea
level.
A
ten
feet
increase
over
the
permitted
elevation.
19.
On
April
30,
1997,
Respondent
submitted
to
the
Illinois
EPA,
a
document
titled,
‘
T
ADDENDUM
TO
THE
APPLICATION
FOR
SIGNIFICANT
MODIFICATION
TO
PERMIT
MORRIS
COMMUNITY
LANDFILL
-
PARCEL
B.”
The
information
contained
therein
showed,
that
in
excess
of
475,000
cubic
yards
of
waste
was
disposed
of
above
the
permitted
landfill
height
of
580
feet
above
mean
sea
level.
20.
As
of
July
20,
1999
or
on
dates
better
known
to
Respondent,
portions
of
Parcel
B
exceeded
580
feet
above
mean
sea
level.
21.
Section
21(o)
(9)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(o)
(9)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
Conduct
a
sanitary
landfill
operation
which
is
required
to
have
a
permit
under
subsection
(d)
of
this
Section,
in
a
manner
which
results
in
any
of
the
following
conditions:
20
9.
deposition
of
refuse
in
any
unpermitted
portion
of
the
landfill.
22.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois,
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998)
23.
Refuse
is
waste
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.53
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.53
(1998).
24.
On
and
before
August
5,
1996
or
a
date
better
known
to
Respondent
and
continuing
until
the
filing
of
this
Second
Amended
Complaint
herein,
Respondent
deposited
refuse
inunpermitted
portions
of
parcel
B.
Respondent
did
not
have
a
permit
issued
by
the
Illinois
EPA
to
deposit
refuse
above
its
permitted
elevation
of
580
feet
above
mean
sea
level.
25.
By
depositing
refuse
or
waste
in
portions
of
parcel
B
above
its
permitted
elevation,
Respondent
violated
Section
21(o)
(9)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(o)
(9)
(1998)
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
VII:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
Section
21(o)
(9)
of
the
Act;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Section
21(o)
(9)
of
the
Act;
21
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
addition
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
its
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
VIII
CONDUCTING
A
WASTE
DISPOSAL
OPERATION
WITHOUT
A
PERMIT
1-20.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
Count
VII
as
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
this
Count
VIII
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
21.
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
Conduct
any
waste-storage,
waste-treatment,
orwaste-
disposal
operation:
1.
without
a
permit
granted
by
the
Agency
or
in
violation
of
any
conditions
imposed
by
such
permit,
including
periodic
reports
and
full
access
to
adequate
records
and
the
inspection
of
facilities,
as
may
be
necessary
to
ensure
compliance
with
this
Act,
and
with
regulations
and
standards
adopted
thereunder.
.
.
22.
Respondent
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998).
22
23.
Refuse
is
waste
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.53
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.53
(1998).
24.
By
causing
or
allowing
refuse
or
waste
to
be
deposited
in
Parcel
B
at
the
landfill
above
the
permitted
elevation
of
580
feet
above
mean
sea
level,
unpermitted
areas
of
the
landfill,
Respondent
conducted
a
waste-storage
or
waste-disposal
operation.
25.
Respondent
did
not
have
a
permit
for
the
disposal
of
waste
above
an
elevation
of
580
feet
above
mean
sea
level.
26.
Since
at
least
August
5,
1996,
or
a
date
better
known
to
Respondent
and
continuing
until
the
filing
of
this
Second
Amended
Complaint,
Respondent
has
waste
in
unpermitted
portions
of
Parcel
B
of
the
landfill
in
violation
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998)
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC
with
respect
to
Count
VIII:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
day
of
23
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
its
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
IX
OPEN
DUMPING
1-20.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
Count
VII
as
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
this
Count
IX
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
21.
Section
21(a)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(a)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
a.
Cause
or
allow
the
open
dumping
of
any
waste.
22.
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998),
provides
the
following
definition:
“OPEN
DUMPING”
means
the
consolidation
of
refuse
from
one
or
more
sources
at
a
disposal
site
that
does
not
fulfill
the
requirements
of
a
sanitary
landfill.
23.
Sections
3.31
and
3.43
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.31,
3.43
(1998),
provides
the
following
definitions,
respectively:
TTREFUSEIT
means
waste.
TTSITEII
means
any
location,
place,
tract
of
land,
and
facilities,
including,
butnot
limited
to
buidings,
and
improvements
used
for
purposes
subject
to
regulation
or
control
by
this
Act
or
regulations
thereunder.
24.
The
landfill
is
a
“disposal
site”
as
those
terms
are
defined
24
in
the
Act.
25.
Since
at
least
August
5,
1996,
or
a
date
better
known
to
Respondent,
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
the
consolidation
of
refuse
at
the
site,
above
the
permitted
elevation
of
580
feet
above
mean
sea
level.
26.
The
consolidation
of
refuse
at
the
site
on
Parcel
B
above
the
permitted
elevation
of
580
feet
above
mean
sea
level,
disposal
areas
that
do
not
fulfill
the
requirements
of
a
sanitary
landfill,
constitutes
TT
open
dumpingiT
as
that
term
is
defined
in
Section
3.24of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.24
(1998).
27.
Respondent,
by
its
conduct
described
herein,
has
and
continues
to
violate
Section
21(a)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(a)
(1998)
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OFTHE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
IX:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
Section
21(a)
of
the
Act;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Section
21(a)
of
the
Act;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
25
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
the
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
X
VIOLATION
OF
STANDARD
CONDITION
3
1-20.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein,
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
Count
VII
as
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
this
Count
X
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
21.
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
Conduct
any
waste-storage,
waste-treatment,
orwaste-
disposal
operation:
1.
without
a
permit
granted
by
the
Agency
or
in
violation
of
any
conditions
imposed
by
such
permit,
including
periodic
reports
and
full
access
to
adequate
records
and
the
inspection
of
facilities,
as
may
be
necessary
to
ensure
compliance
with
this
Act,
and
with
regulations
and
standards
adopted
thereunder.
.
22.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998).
23.
Refuse
is
waste
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.53
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.53
(1998).
24.
Standard
condition
number
3
of
supplemental
development
permit
number
1989-005-SP
which
was
issued
to
Respondent
on
June
5,
26
1989,
provides
as
follows:
There
shall
be
no
deviation
from
the
approved
plans
and
specifications
unless
a
written
request
for
modification
of
the
project,
along
with
plans
and
specifications
as
required,
shall
have
been
submitted
to
the
Agency
and
a
supplemental
written
permit
issued.
25.
Respondent
was
required
by
standard
condition
number
3
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
l989-005-SP,
to
obtain
a
supplemental
permit
in
order
to
increase
its
landfill
elevation
above
the
permitted
limit,
before
depositing
waste
inthe
landfill
above
the
permitted
limit
of
580
feet
above
mean
sea
level.
26.
Since
at
least
August
5,
1996,
or
a
date
better
known
to
Respondent
and
continuing
until
the
filing
of
this
Second
Amended
Complaint,
Respondent
failed
to
obtain
a
supplemental
permit
to
increase
the
permitted
elevation
of
the
landfill
before
depositing
waste
therein,
above
580
feet
above
mean
sea
level.
27.
Respondent,
by
its
conduct
described
herein,
has
and
continues
to
violate
standard
condition
number
3
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
l989-005-SP,
and
thereby,
also
violates
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998).
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
X:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act
and
standard
condition
number
3
of
permit
27
Di
H
Cl
C)
—
3
<
3
CD
CD
li
H-
CU
H-
-t1}
i
H-
Ft
I-
I-
Ft
k<
<
01
0
Hi
CD
CD
3
H-
C)
o
I-
H-
ci
CD
0
H
-,
CD
Di
CD
CD
Hi
0
I-
Ft
HHOI
H
CD
‘t
0
H-
o
‘-Q
<
CD
0
W
0
H
0
H-
3
3
F-h
C)
0
Di
0
0
CD
0)
CD
Di
H
H
0
Hi
H
h
H
Z
Cl)
t
U
C)
c-t
3
tJ
p1
Ft
—
0
0
0
Cl)
I-
Cn
CD
Ft
k<
CD
Hi
I-
0
hrj
Ft
Hi
Dl
3
CD
I-’
Ci
0
0
t
CD
F
Co
CD
01
C)
0
F-
Dl
H-
iQ
H-
Di
Cl)
CD
Cl
o
CJ)H-CDC3
FI-QIH<
0
Ft
3
H-
Di
Dl
h
-
H-
CD
H-
C)
H-
Ci)
CD
H-
Ft
Ft
H-
3
Hi
Dl
Cfl
CD
0CDQ0
3
CD
p
3
C)
3
H-
i—s
H-
Ft
Ft
3
Id
1
Ft
Ct
3
CD
CD
3
H-
Q
FtC)CDCi
CDCDCJ0
0
o
CD
H
H-
-,
ctctH-Cfl
l1
H
CD
0
Dl
ci
3
)i
H-Dict
CDCl0Di
H
(
Ft
Di0H
ctCDH
1
ct
CD
0
H
:tj
Dl
CD
C)
—.
Cl
CD
3
CD
b
l:)
CD
CD1HCDCi
0Cl
CD
D
Cl
i
Ft
CD
0
CD
C)
CD
H
d
CnDiiC)
‘‘ct
Di
3
0
Di
Dl
‘d
rJ
H-
tj
—.
0
l
c-I-c-I-ct
Di
H
Ft
Ci
0
3
Ft
0
CD
0
<1
Cl
3
OHH-
00CD
H
0
W
Ft
Cl
Ft
3
P1
3
H-
H
‘—
Cl
H0
j
L<
Hi
‘.
0
Cl
3
Cl
H
o
CD
CD
i-
CD
Cl
CD
0)
H
3
HibH-
C)
H
Ft
H
‘
C)
0-
ci
H,HCi
Dl
CD
ClII
CD
Ft
Ij
Ft
CD
h-
H-Cl)
CDCDF-I
CD
CD
HHct
aQiQ
CD
Lz
IQ
H-
CD
CD
0
0
0
Ft
Ft
H
F-h
Dl
0
Hi
0
CD’30H-H
h-I
C)
Hi
—
i-
Id
H
Hi
0
H
0
H
o
H-
CD
CU
F
Ft
01
Ft
C)
00
DJCD
ft
Dl
0
I
CD
Cl)
d
I
D
CD
CD
HH-H-
Hi
Dl
tt)
‘
Hi
CD
Dl
CD
CD
C/)
CD
CU
CDHH-
I-0
Ci
C)
I<
Di
0
hj
CD
t-
3
H
Cl
H-
0
IH
C)
Hi
CD
CD
CD
Dl
-Cl)-
D
C)
FtC)’
H,0
CDHCfl
H
H
CD
CDDICl
01
-<
H
H
H
Ft
Dl
Ft
H
0
<
H-
3
frIOCiC)H-
cictO
CD
—
H-
F-h
Dl
Cl
H
CD
I1tH-H,
I-—
H
CD
M
CD
3
C)
o
0
Ft
Di
LJH<
Di
1)
Cl
0
0
H
Cl
Cl
HCDH-
FtDJU)
Ci)
0
H
Co
CD
CD
0
Dl
Cl)
CD—JC)cto
H-CDCD
F-h
0
0
Cl
Ft
Ft
H]
CD
CD
0
0
01
0
Hi
Ft
Di
CD
0
H-
J
Ft
H-
Cl
33FI-
-
F-I
0
Q
0
Dl
CD
CDOFt
0
CDOH-
D
Ft
Cl
H-
CD
Cl
Ft
I1H,0CDd
0
OCD
Di
3
H
i
Cl
Ft
Di
pi
F-h
CD
C)
CD
Di
F-I
F-I
ClOUi
Cl
CD
CD
H
I-
3
Cl
Cl
0
CDCDF-IDi
0h
XCDiOC)ct
‘C
H
I-I
Ci
Cl
CD
H
CD
Cl)
Cl
Cl
C)
iCDCD
FI-H
H
H
CDOH
CDCDH
co
3
p1
OHDiODi
0
CD
Hi
Ft
H-
Dl
Di
0
0
Di
Di
Dl
3
k<
3
H
3
3
CD
LXI
Ft
(
H
Cl
CD
Hi
Di
Di
H
FI-CDcthli
CD
CX)
CD
H
DiH-
‘-<
0DiH
F-I
CD
0
Cl
1
Ft
I-h
H-0
CiH,H
Dl
0
H-
<
F-I
Cl
CD
H-
Ci
3
d
H-
0
11
i
i
I-Ict)
CD
Cl)
CD
CD
Ft
Ft
CDCD
Di
F-I
H-
Ft
F-I
Dl
H-
0
Dl
Ft
C)
0
CD
Di
H
Di
Ft
CD
Cl
H-
1d
CD
Di
CD
it
U’
Cl
H
I-I
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
H-
0
H
CD
CD
CD
a
LI
a
LI
Di
CD
CD
0
CD
CD
0
H-
H-
H-
H
0
0
•
H
H-
i
LI
0
LI
Cn
CD$H.aoCD
-
C
CD
CD
(D
DiLICD0CDCD<LICD
&OCD
rr
CD
LI
CD
CD
0
OSLICD
0
(0
CD
0
H•CDH0-$Di
CD
LICD
d0
(t
C
CD
0
H-
0f-iCD
CD<CD
CDr-t
H
SH-LIH-
HCDCD
CD
Q
0
LI
H
CD
CDCD0CDCDCDO
CD
LI
0
LI
LIHLICDOO
H-
CDCDCDHLIOCD
H-Q
0
0
LI
Z
0
LI
0
LICDLILI0
CD
CD
OCDHCD
CDH-
H-
CD
LI
H-
LICD0O
0
-
H
C
OCDCD
H
CDOCD
CDLICD
0
CDCD
CD
H
•
CD
-
LIoCDaH.CD
H-
CD
-
H
C
0
LI000CDH
CD
H
H
LILIOLI
CDCDCDDi
LI
LI
<CD
H
CDH-LI
LICD
CD
LI
HLIH
0
Di
CD
H
CD
CD
(B
LI
LICDCDLI
OCDCD
H--
LI
H
CD
0
CDH-
00
H--
0H-
H-
CD
CD
0
LI
CD
0
CDCD
CD0CDCD
S
0
OHCDCDCDHCDO
0
CD
CD
H-LIH
Di
LICD
OOLICD
-
<CD
0
0
CD
LILILI
LI0LILI
CD
hh
H-
E
CD
LI
H-(-tDi<o
Di
-0CD
CD
0
H
H
CD
LICDCDCD$CDH
HCD
CDCD
CD
0
LI
LI
H-
‘I
0
HHLICDCDH
H-
LI$CD
OLICD
H-H-
CDCD
0
H
CD
LI
H-
o
LI
H
•
CDH-CD
CDCD
H
CD
CD
H-
H
-
H
CDCD
CD
H-
-
CD
H
H
(BCD
CD
H-LI0
O0CD
-
H-
LI
CD
0
N)
CD
Q
LICD
0
0
H
0
H0$CDO
H-
SLI
H
0
CD
LI
m
F-
o
LICD0CD
PJ0-t,
CD
0
CD
0
$Di
LIQ
CD
0
CD
H-
CD
CD
H
CD0CD
0
OCDçt
CD
H
frh
0
r1(D
CDCDH
H-
0
CDOCDLI0CD
$
H-H-
CD
H(o
CDCDHHH
0<
LI
CD
LI
OH-LILI
CD)CD
LICDCD<O
CDH-
LICD
H-
H-
CD
0
<
CD
CDCDHCD0CDCDCD
0Di
CD
H-
CD
0
0
H
CD
CD0CD
CDH
CD
CD
H-o
CD
HH-HH
H-H
CD
0
LI
LI
LI
OLILICD
0
Di
LIH-H-
CD
H-
0
0
0
0
HLICD0CDOCD
CD
CD
CDH.CDOHLILICD
OCD
0
0
CD
H
0CDLI
CD
a
LI-
$CDCDCD$
HCD
H-CD
LI
LI
0
CD
H-fl
OCD
CD
0
H-1
•
H-<
CD
H-H-
LI
CD
CD
CD
CD
0LICDLI
0
LI
HH0CDDi
-
CD
••
LI
LI
CD
LI
H
CD
0$
CD0CDLI
CD
CD
0
H
LI
0
0
CD
CD
CD
CD
HCDH.CD
I
0
CD
H-LICDH
H-
0
LICD
LICD$
LI
LI
LI
OCDCD
CD0
CDLI
0
H-
H-
CDCDLIOO
CD
H-
H-CDCD
H-
H-
CD$
(B
0
CD
CD
CD
LI
LIHCDoCDCDH
$H-CD
ODi
0
a
0
LI
H-H-<CD
0
LIH
OLICD
CD
CD
0
HCD0CD
CD
CD
H$HCDH.CDLI
CD
LI
0
0
OLICDO
CD
CD
LI
LI
H-Di0
H-
CD
CD
Qi
•
DiD
H
LIa
H
0
CD
HCDCDHHCD
0CD
LILI
H
CD
CDCDHLILIHCD
CDLILI
LI0
LI
LICDH.
CD
H-
CD
CD
W
CD
CD
H
-
H-
0
CD
0
CD
LILI
H-(B
H-
0
H
H-
H-
H-
N
CD
H-
CD
CD
CD-
LI
‘H-
CD
LI
CDCD
0
CDCDLI
CDLI
LILI
CD
LIH-
LIOCDO
CD
CD
CDCD
CD
LILI
--
HLI
CD
H-
a
CD0CDH.
CDLI
CDO
LI
0
CDLI
CD
0
OH-
CDOLI
OCDCD
LI
CD
0CD
-
CD
CD
LI
61.154
Each
owner
or
operator
of
an
active
waste
disposal
site
that
receives
asbestos
containing
waste
material
from
a
source
covered
under
[Sections]
61.149,
61.150
or
61.155
shall
meet
the
requirements
of
this
section:
(a)
Either
there
must
be
no
visible
emissions
to
the
outside
air
fromany
active
waste
disposal
site
where
asbestoscontaining
waste
material
has
been
deposited,
or
the
requirements
of
paragraph
(c)
or
(d)
of
this
section
mustbe
met.
•
*
*
(c)
Rather
than
meet
the
no
visible
emissionrequirement
of
paragraph
(a)
of
this
section,
at
the
end
of
each
operating
day,
or
at
least
once
every
24-hour
period
while
the
site
is
in
continuous
operation,
the
asbestoscontaining
waste
material
that
hasbeen
deposited
at
the
site
during
the
operating
day
or
previous
24-hour
period
shall:
(1)
Be
covered
with
at
least
15
centimeters
(6
inches)
of
compacted
nonasbestos-containing
material,
or
(2)
Be
covered
with
a
resinous
or
petroleum-based
dust
suppression
agent
that
effectively
binds
dust
and
controls
wind
erosion.
Such
an
agent
shall
be
used
in
the
manner
and
frequency
recommended
for
the
particular
dust
by
thedust
suppression
agent
manufacturer
to
achieve
and
maintain
dust
control.
Other
equally
effective
dust
suppression
agents
maybe
used
upon
prior
approval
by
the
Administrator.
For
purposes
of
this
paragraph,
any
used,
spent,
or
other
waste
oil
is
not
considered
a
dust
suppression
agent.
•
*
*
(f)
Maintain,
until
closure,
records
of
the
location,
depth
and
area,
and
quantity
in
cubicmeters
(cubic
yards)
of
asbestos-containing
waste
material
within
the
disposal
site
on
a
map
or
diagram
of
the
disposal
area.
30
17.
On
May
11,
1999
there
were
exposed
bags
of
asbestos
containing
waste
material
(IIACWM!!)
that
were
dumped
on
the
site
in
the
week
prior
to
that
inspection.
18.
on
May
11,
1999,
many
of
the
uncovered
bags
of
ACWM
were
torn
open
and
strewn
about
the
landfill,
thereby
allowing
the
release
of
asbestos
fibers
and
failing
toprevent
visible
emissions
from
the
active
landfilling
of
ACWM.
in
violation
of
40
CFR
61.154(a).
19.
On
May
11,
1999,
Respondent
did
not
have
any
records
indicating
the
location,
depth,
area
and
quantity
of
ACWM
within
the
landfill
in
violation
of
40
CFR
61.154(f).
20.
On
at
least
May
11,
1999,
and
beginning
on
a
date
or
dates
better
known
to
Respondent,
Respondent
failed
to
cover
the
ACWM
at
the
end
of
each
operating
day
or
within
a
24-hour
period
in
violation
of
40
CFR
61.154(c).
21.
By
the
actions
alleged
herein,
Respondent
has
violated
Section
9.1
of
the
Act
and
40
CFR
61.154.
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
orderin
favor
of
Complainant
and
against
Respondent,
and:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter,
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
violated
Section
9.1(d)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/9.1(d)
(1998),
and
40
CFR
61.154;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
submit
proper
records
of
the
indicating
the
location,
depth,
area
and
quantity
of
ACWM
within
the
31
0
CD
U)
0
U)
9)
H
H
H
1Q
H-0
U)j
Oj
HFtCD’dO
U)0
(DOiCDHiH-
CDct
1H
Ft
H
CD
H-9)
HFtOO
rtCDH-
Ft
CD
H-H
00
OCDH-
09)
ct
U)0U)(Dad
H-Ft
0ddH-CD
OCD
CDSCDOFtH
Ii
d0HH-
••w
aHFtFtOH-
Ft
H-H-U)rt
(1)9)0
U)
9)
(-)
9)0
iH-H
L’—)
CD0aP)
Cl)
Hi
CD
HiOFt
HH-HiU)CD
artCDHCDa
(1)
Ft
9)FtHCDb<
CD
0H-FtO
Ft
Ft
dU)H-CD(flJ
H
Ft
CDWCD
CD
CDWW0
9)
Ft
ct
Ft
(-C
ct-
9)OdCD
CD
::3
U)
CD
CD9)
PJHO
Ft
-
CD
P.
9)
Cl)
H
ç
<IQFtO
0
i-
L-j
H
a
H-
ty
9)
CDFtCDFtH-H
H
•
i
0
CDHH
Ft
•
0CDH-
CD
CD0O
I
•
U)OH-H
U)H9)
•
DaFt
HU)
H
d
()
d
H
0
9)
0
H
•
9)
H-
c-t
ir
a
H
H
CD
)<
9)
U)
•
H
d
H
9)
U)
U)
P)
(ID
U)
H
Hi
CD
C)
0
0
H-
Ft
o
I-’
Ft
Hi
H
H-
H
0
0
Hi
0
H
9)
U)
H
H
•.
M
H
H
k<
—
10
1)
Ft
CD
—.--
Ft
0
H
H
Hi
CD
—
Hi
9)
H
0
I-
0
H
Hi
Ft
CD
Ii
(.0
Ft
Ft
CD
(1)
CD
CD
H
H
9)
CD
j
0
H-
U)
a
Ft
H-
9)
H
0
H
9)
U]
.c
H
H
H
9)
1:-I
H
C)
9)
(ID
Ft
CD
U]
H
—
1-3
Ft
H
—
H
H
Ii
CD
—.-.
(.0
Hi
H
CD
—
H
—
10
CD
H
1-3
(.
0
D
CD
1X
Hi
::—
Ft
CD
H-
CD
H
j
0
0
0
I-
H
0
H
CD
CD
CD
<
CD
a
CD
j
H
CD
a
Ft
0
CD
0
CD
H
Ft
-
Ft
H
H
CD
H-
Hi
a
H-
H
Ft
CD
0
Cyi
-
C)
Q
-
H-
H-
CD
H-
0
CD
0
H
0
0
H
a
Ft
0
CD
CD
H
Hi
a
H
U)
CD
0
Hi
Ft
H
•
CD
Ft
CD
CD
H
H
0
CD
CD
CD
H
H
0
i
CD
CD
Ft
Ft
Hi
H-
H-
H-
CD
H-
CD
H-
CD
Q
CD
Ft
H
0
Ft
Ft
Ft
CD
CD
CD
U)
CD
U)
CD
0
CD
H
0
CD
0
0
0
0
H
Hi
H-
H
Ft
a
H
0
H
0
H-
a
CD
CD
0
CD
0
CD
H
Ft
Ft
Ft
U)
a
Ft
CD
Ft
H
Ft
CD
0
CD
0
U)
H
CD
Hi
Ft
H
H
H
Ft
0
CD
H
CD
0
CD
Ft
0
H
CD
Hi
H
0
0
CD
0
Ft
CD
CD
H
H-
CD
H
CD
a
H-
Hi
CD
CD
U)
a
CD
0
0
CD
Hi
CD
CD
Hi
Ft
Hi
H
U)
CD
H
H-
a
Ft
CD
H
H
<
H
H
H-
Ft
CD
H
H
H
a
H
0
CD
a
CD
H
H
CD
Ft
C)
U)
C)
0
H-
0
Ft
CD
Ft
H
0
H
—
0
U)
Hi
a
-
CD
H
H-
H-
o
0
0
Ft
a
0
Hi
a
•
CD
0
H
H
CD
H
•
Ft
0
o
0
a
U)
a
CD
o
CD
H
CD
H-
H
Ft
CD
H
Hi
Ft
Hi
0
H
U)
Ft
0
Ft
ci-
-•
CD
H
H
d
CD
CD
-
CD
CD
CD
H
0
a
1_i-
24.
Respondent
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998).
25.
Refuse
is
waste
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.53
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.53
(1998)
26.
The
enactment
of
Part
814
of
the
Board’s
waste
disposal
regulations
required,
pursuant
to
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
Part
814
Subpart
D,
that
non-hazardous
waste
landfills
initiate
closure
by
September
18,
1997
if
they
cannot
demonstrate,
through
a
significant
modification
permit
application
and
Illinois
EPA
inspection,
compliance
with
the
more
stringent
requirements
of
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
Part
814
Subpart
C.
27.
Subpart
C
of
Part
814,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
814.301-302,
specifically,
814.301(a),
allows
a
permitted
facility
that
meets
the
requirements
of
that
Subpart
to
stay
open
past
September
18,
1997.
28.
In
order
to
meet
the
requirements
of
Subpart
C
of
Part
814,
a
facility
must
comply
with
the
requirements
of
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code:
Subtitle
G,
Part
811,
including,
but
not
limited
to
the
requirements
of
811.704.
Section
811.704
of
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
requires
the
post-
closure
cost
estimates
shall
be
“based
on
the
assumption
that
the
Agency
will
contract
with
a
third
party
to
implement
the
closure
planTT.
29.
A
facility
which
accepted
waste
after
1992
that
fails
to
meet
the
requirements
of
Subpart
C
is
subject
to
therequirements
of
Subpart
D.
33
30.
Subpart
D
of
Part
814,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
814.401-402,
requires
a
facility
regulated
under
this
Subpart
to
close
and
stop
accepting
waste
within
seven
(7)
years
of
the
effective
date
of
Part
814.
Part
814
became
effective
on
September
18,
1990.
31.
Section
814.105(b)
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
814.105(b),
provides
temporary
relief
from
this
closure
requirement
for
facilities
that
timely
file
their
application
for
significant
modification
and
reads
as
follows:
b)
An
operator
who
has
timely
filed
a
notification
pursuant
to
Section
814.103
and
an
application
for
significant
permit
modification
pursuant
to
Section
814.104
shall
continue
operation
under
the
terms
of
its
existing
permits
until
final
determination
by
the
Agency
on
its
application
and
any
subsequent
appeal
to
the
Board
pursuant
toSection
40
of
the
Act.
During
this
time,
the
operator
will
be
deemed
to
be
in
compliance
with
all
requirements
of
this
Part.
32.
Section
814.104
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
814.104,
provides,
in
pertinent
part,
as
follows:
(a)
All
operators
of
landfills
permitted
pursuant
to
Section
21(d)
of
the
Environmental
Protection
Act,
(Act)
(Ill.
Rev.
Stat.
1989,
ch.
111
1,,
par.
1021(d))
[now
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1998)]
shall
file
an
application
for
a
significant
modification
to
their
permits
for
existing
units,
unless
the
unitswill
be
closed
pursuant
to
Subpart
B
within
two
years
of
the
effective
date
of
this
Part.
*
*
*
(c)
The
application
shall
be
filed
within
48
months
of
the
effective
date
of
this
Part,
or
at
such
earlier
time
as
the
Agency
shall
specify
in
writing
pursuant
to
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.209
or
813.201(b).
33.
Forty
Eight
(48)
monthsfrom
the
effective
date
of
Part
814
34
was
September
18,
1994.
34.
The
Illinois
EPA
specified
in
writing
that
Respondent
was
to
submit
its
application
for
significant
modification
of
its
permit
by
June
15,
1993.
35.
Respondent
failed
to
submit
its
application
by
June
15,
1993.
36.
On
April
26,
1995,
Respondent
filed
a
petition
for
variance
with
the
Board.
37.
On
June
17,
1996,
the
Appellate
Court
entered
an
Order
overturning
the
Board’s
variance
denial
and
ordered
the
“Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
to
immediately
issue
a
prospective
variance
to
Community
Landfill
Corporation
allowing
it
to
file
its
significant
modification
application
within
45
days
1T
.
38.
In
a
subsequently
issued
written
opinion,
the
Appellate
Court
noted
that
it
did
not
award
Respondent
the
extraordinary
relief
of
a
retroactive
variance.
39.
Respondent
filed
its
application
for
significant
modification
on
August
5,
1996,
within
the
45
days
allowed
by
the
prospective
variance.
40.
Among
other
defects,
as
part
of
its
application
for
significant
modification,
Respondent
did
not
provide
the
Illinois
EPA
with
post-closure
cost
estimates
Tlbased
on
the
assumption
that
the
Agency
will
contract
with
a
third
party
to
implement
the
closure
plan”.
41.
By
failing
to
demonstrate
the
ability
to
comply
with
Part
35
811
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
Respondent
does
not
meet
the
requirements
of
814
Subpart
C,
and
therefore
is
subject
to
the
requirements
of
Subpart
D
including
the
requirement
that
it
initiate
closure
of
the
site
by
September
18,
1997.
42.
By
failing
to
file
a
timely
application
for
significant
modification,
Respondent
had
no
legal
authority
to
continue
accepting
waste
at
the
facility
past
September
18,
1997.
44.
Respondent
has
been
accepting
waste
in
Parcel
A
at
the
facility
from
September
18,
1997
through
the
date
of
filing
of
this
Second
Amended
Complaint.
45.
By
accepting
waste
in
Parcel
A
after
September
18,
1997,
Respondent
violated
Section
21(d)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1998),
and
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
814.301(b)
and
814.401.
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OFTHE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC
with
respect
to
Count
XII:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearingin
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
Section
21(d)
of
the
Act
and
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
814.301
and
814.401;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
fromany
further
violations
of
Section
21(d)
of
the
Act
and
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
814.301
and
814.401
4.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
accepting
waste
at
the
site,
until
such
time
as
it
is
permitted
to
accept
waste;
36
5.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
day
of
violation;
6.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
its
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
7.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
XIII
IMPROPER
DISPOSAL
OF
USED
TIRES
1-12.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein,
paragraphs
1
through
8,
10
through
12
and
14,
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
12
of
this
Count
XIII
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
13.
Section
55(b-l)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/55(b-i)
(1998),
provides,
in
pertinentpart,
as
follows:
b-l
Beginning
January
1,
1995,
no
person
shall
knowingly
mix
any
used
or
waste
tire,
either
whole
or
cut,
with
municipal
waste,
and
no
owner
or
operator
of
a
sanitary
landfill
shall
accept
any
used
or
waste
tire
for
final
disposal;
except
that
used
or
waste
tires,
when
separated
from
other
waste,
may
be
accepted
if:
(1)
the
sanitary
landfill
provides
and
maintains
a
means
for
shredding,
slitting,
or
chopping
whole
tires
and
so
treats
whole
tires
and,
if
approved
by
the
Agency
in
a
permit
issued
under
this
Act,
uses
the
used
or
waste
tires
for
alternative
uses,
which
may
include
on-sitepractices
such
as
lining
of
roadways
with
tire
scraps,
alternative
daily
cover,
or
use
in
a
leachate
collection
system
or
(2)
the
sanitary
landfill,
by
its
notification
to
the
Illinois
Industrial
Materials
Exchange
Service,
makes
available
the
used
or
waste
tires
to
an
appropriate
facility
for
37
reuse,
reprocessing,
or
converting,
including
use
as
an
alternative
energy
fuel.
14.
On
July
28,
1998,
Respondent
was
mixing
waste
tires
with
municipal
waste
and
placing
them
in
the
active
area
of
Parcel
A
of
the
landfill
for
disposal.
16.
By
the
actions
described
herein,
Respondent
has
violated
Section
55(b-l)
of
the
Act.
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
XIII:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
Section
55(b-l)
of
the
Act;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Section
55(b-1)
of
the
Act;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
the
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
XIV
38
VIOLATION
OF
PERMIT
CONDITION
1-20.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein,
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
this
Count
XIV
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
21.
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
Conduct
any
waste-storage,
waste-treatment,
or
waste-
disposal
operation:
1.
without
a
permit
granted
by
the
Agency
or
in
violation
of
any
conditions
imposed
by
such
permit,
including
periodicreports
and
full
access
to
adequate
records
and
the
inspection
of
facilities,
as
may
be
necessary
to
ensure
compliance
with
this
Act,
and
with
regulations
and
standards
adopted
thereunder.
.
22.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois,
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998).
23.
Refuse
is
waste
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.53
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.53
(1998)
24.
Special
condition
number
13
of
supplemental
development
permit
number
1989-005-SP
which
was
issued
to
Respondent
on
June
5,
1989,
provides
as
follows:
Movable,
temporary
fencing
will
be
used
to
prevent
blowing
litter,
when
the
refuse
fill
is
at
a
higher
elevation
than
the
natural
ground
line.
25.
Respondent
was
required
by
special
condition
number
13
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
1989-005-SP,
to
utilize
movable
fencing
to
prevent
blowing
litter
when
the
refuse
fill
is
at
a
39
higher
elevation
than
the
natural
ground
line.
26.
On
March,
31,1999,
a
windy
day,
Respondent
did
not
use
movable
fencing
even
though
the
fill
was
at
a
higher
elevation
than
the
natural
ground
line
and
litter
was
blowing
all
over
the
landfill.
27.
Respondent,
by
its
conduct
described
herein,
violated
special
condition
number
13
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
1989-005-SP,
and
thereby,
also
violates
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998)
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
XIV:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act
and
special
condition
number
13
of
permit
number
1989-005-SP;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act
and
special
condition
number
13
of
permit
number
1989-005-SP;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
the
40
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
XV
VIOLATION
OF
PERMIT
CONDITION
1-20.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein,
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
this
Count
XV
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
21.
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
Conduct
any
waste-storage,
waste-treatment,
or
waste-
disposal
operation:
1.
without
a
permit
granted
by
the
Agency
or
in
violation
of
any
conditions
imposed
by
such
permit,
including
periodic
reports
and
full
access
to
adequate
records
and
the
inspection
of
facilities,
as
may
be
necessary
to
ensure
compliance
with
this
Act,
and
with
regulations
and
standards
adopted
thereunder.
.
22.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois,
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998).
23.
Refuse
is
waste
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.53
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.53
(1998)
24.
Special
condition
number
1
of
supplemental
development
permit
number
l996-240-SP
which
was
issued
to
Respondent
on
October
24,
1996,
provides
as
follows:
This
permit
allows
the
development
and
construction
of
an
active
gas
management
system
and
a
gas
flare.
Prior
to
operation
of
the
gas
control
facility,
the
applicant
shall
41
provide
to
the
Agency
the
following
information,
certified
by
a
registered
professional
engineer.
a)
“as
built”
construction
plans;
b)
boring
logs
for
the
gas
extraction
wells;
c)
any
changes
to
the
operation
and
maintenance
of
the
system;
d)
contingency
plan
describing
the
emergency
procedures
that
will
be
implemented
in
the
event
of
a
fire
or
explosion
at
the
facility;
and
e)
permit
numbers
from
the
Agency’s
Bureaus
of
Air
and
Water.
This
information
shall
be
submitted
in
the
form
of
a
permit
application.
25.
Respondent
was
required
by
special
condition
number
1
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
1996-240-SP,
to
provide
the
Illinois
EPA
with
the
abovementioned
information,
before
operating
its
gas
control
facility.
26.
on
or
about
March
31,
1999,
or
on
a
date
or
dates
better
known
to
Respondent,
Respondent
began
operation
of
the
gas
control
facility
at
the
site
without
providing
the
necessary
information
to
the
Illinois
EPA.
27.
On
May
5,
1999,
the
Illinois
EPA
received
Respondents’
submittal
regarding
an
operating
authorization
request
for
the
landfill
gas
management
system
Dated
April
22,
1999.
28.
Respondent,
by
its
conduct
described
herein,
violated
special
condition
number
1
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
1996-240-SP,
and
thereby,
also
violated
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998).
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
42
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
XV:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act
and
special
condition
number
1
of
permit
number
1996-240-SP;
3.
ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act
and
special
condition
number
1
of
permit
number
1996-240-SP;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
the
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
XVI
VIOLATION
OF
PERMIT
CONDITION
1-20.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein,
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
this
Count
XVI
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
21.
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
43
Conduct
any
waste-storage,
waste-treatment,
or
waste-
disposal
operation:
1.
without
a
permit
granted
by
the
Agency
or
in
violation
of
any
conditions
imposed
by
such
permit,
including
periodic
reports
and
full
access
to
adequate
records
and
the
inspection
of
facilities,
as
may
be
necessary
to
ensure
compliance
with
this
Act,
and
with
regulations
and
standards
adopted
thereunder.
.
22.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois,
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998)
23.
Refuse
is
waste
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.53
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.53
(1998)
24.
Special
condition
number
9
of
supplemental
development
permit
number
1996-240-SP,
provides
as
follows:
While
the
site
is
being
developed
or
operated
as
a
gas
control
or
extraction
facility,
corrective
action
shall
be
taken
if
erosion
or
ponding
are
observed,
if
cracks
greater
than
one
inch
wide
haveformed,
if
gas,
odor,
vegetative
or
vector
problems
arise,
or
if
leachate
popoutsorseeps
are
present
in
the
areas
disturbed
by
constructing
this
gas
collection
facility.
25.
Respondent
was
required
by
special
condition
number
9
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
1996-240-SP,
to
take
corrective
action
when
there
was
erosion,
ponding,
and
cracks
greater
than
one
inch
wide
at
the
facility.
26.
On
or
about
March
31,
1999,
or
on
a
date
or
dates
better
known
to
Respondent,
on
Parcel
A,
there
was
erosion,
ponding
and
cracks
over
one
inch
wide
at
the
facility,
no
vegetative
cover,
and
no
corrective
action
was
being
taken.
44
27.
On
July
20,
1999,
there
was
not
a
vegetative
cover
over
the
entire
Parcel
B
of
the
landfill.
28.
Respondent,
by
its
conduct
described
herein,
violated
special
condition
number
9
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
1996-240-SP,
and
thereby,
also
violated
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998)
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
XVI:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act
and
special
condition
number
9
of
permit
number
1996-240-SP;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Actand
special
condition
number
9
of
permit
number
1996-240-SP;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
the
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
45
COUNT
XVII
VIOLATION
OF
PERMIT
CONDITION
1-20.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein,
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
this
Count
XVII
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
21.
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
Conduct
any
waste-storage,
waste-treatment,
orwaste-
disposal
operation:
1.
without
a
permit
granted
by
the
Agency
or
in
violation
of
any
conditions
imposed
by
such
permit,
including
periodic
reports
and
full
access
to
adequate
records
and
the
inspection
of
facilities,
as
may
be
necessary
to
ensure
compliance
with
this
Act,
and
with
regulations
and
standards
adopted
thereunder.
.
22.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois,
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998)
23.
Refuse
is
waste
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.53
of
the
Act,
415
IIJCS
5/3.53
(1998).
24.
Special
condition
number
11
of
supplemental
development
permit
number
1996-240-SP,
provides
as
follows:
Condensate
from
the
gas
accumulations
system,
and
leachate
pumped
and
removed
from
the
landfill
shall
be
disposed
at
an
IEPA
permitted
publically
owned
treatment
works,
or
a
commercial
treatment
or
disposal
facility.
The
condensate
shall
be
analyzed
to
determine
if
hazardous
waste
characteristics
are
present.
A
written
log
showing
the
volume
of
liquid
discharged
to
the
treatment
facility
each
day
by
the
landfill
will
be
maintained
at
the
landfill.
This
log
will
also
show
the
hazardous
waste
determination
46
analytical
results.
25.
Respondent
was
required
by
special
condition
number
11
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
1996-240-SP,
todispose
of
leachate
pumped
from
the
cells
at
a
permitted,
publically
owned
treatment
works,
or
a
commercial
treatment
or
disposal
facility.
26.
On
or
about
March
31,
1999
and
July
20,1999,
and
continuing
through
to
the
present,
or
to
a
date
or
dates
better
known
to
Respondent,
Respondent
is
placing
leachate
pumped
from
the
landfill
into
new
cells
for
added
moisture
and
not
disposing
of
it
at
a
permitted
facility.
27.
Respondent,
by
its
conduct
described
herein,
has
and
continues
to
violate
special
condition
number
11
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
1996-240-SP,
and
thereby,
also
violates
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998)
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
XVII:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
orallowed
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act
and
special
condition
number
11
of
permit
number
1996-240-SP;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act
and
special
condition
number
11
of
permit
number
1996-240-SP,
including,
but
not
limited
to
the
47
improper
use
or
disposal
of
leachate;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
the
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
XVIII
VIOLATION
OF
PERMIT
CONDITION
1-20.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein,
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
this
Count
XVIII
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
21.
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
Conduct
any
waste-storage,
waste-treatment,
or
waste-
disposal
operation:
1.
without
a
permit
granted
by
the
Agency
or
in
violation
of
any
conditions
imposed
by
such
permit,
including
periodic
reports
and
full
access
to
adequate
records
and
the
inspection
of
facilities,
as
may
be
necessary
to
ensure
compliance
with
this
Act,
and
with
regulations
and
standards
adopted
thereunder.
.
.
22.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois,
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998)
48
23.
Refuse
is
waste
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.53
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.53
(1998)
24.
Special
condition
number
10
of
supplemental
development
permit
number
1996-240-SP,
provides
as
follows:
Any
penetration
or
disturbance
of
the
final
cover
material
at
this
facility
caused
by
the
construction
of
the
gas
control
system
shall
be
sealed
or
repaired
to
ensure
that
a
minimum
of
two
feet
of
compacted
clay
final
cover
exists
above
all
buried
appurtenances
of
the
gas
collection
system.
25.
Respondent
was
required
by
special
condition
number
10
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
1996-240-SP,
to
ensure
that
a
minimum
of
two
feet
of
clay
cover
existed
above
the
appurtenances
which
were
supposed
to
be
buried.
26.
On
or
about
July
20,
1999,
and
continuing
through
tothe
present,
or
to
a
date
or
dates
better
known
to
Respondent,
the
appurtenances
which
were
to
be
buried
per
the
permit
application
were
exposed.
27.
Respondent,
by
its
conduct
described
herein,
has
and
continues
to
violate
special
condition
number
10
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
l996-240-SP,
and
thereby,
also
violates
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998)
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
XVII:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
49
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act
and
special
condition
number
10
of
permit
number
l996-240-SP;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act
and
special
condition
number
10
of
permit
number
1996-240-SP;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorneyfees,
expended
by
the
State
in
the
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
XIX
FAILURE
TO
PROVIDE
AND
MAINTAIN
ADEQUATE
FINANCIAL
ASSURANCE
PURSUANT
TO
THE
OCTOBER
24,
1996
PERMIT
1-20.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein,
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
this
Count
XIX
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
21.
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
Conduct
any
waste-storage,
waste-treatment,
or
waste
disposal
operation:
1.
without
a
permit
granted
by
the
Agency
or
in
violation
of
any
conditions
imposed
by
such
permit,
including
50
periodic
reports
and
full
access
to
adequate
records
and
the
inspection
of
facilities,
as
may
be
necessary
to
ensure
compliance
with
this
Act,
and
with
regulations
and
standards
adopted
thereunder.
22.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois,
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998)
23.
Refuse
is
waste
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.53
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.53
(1998)
24.
Special
condition
number
13
of
supplemental
development
permit
number
1996-240-SP,
dated
October
24,
1996,
provides
as
follows:
Financial
assurance
shall
be
maintained
by
the
operator
in
accordance
with
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code,
Subtitle
G,
Part
807,
Subpart
F
in
an
amount
equal
to
the
current
cost
estimate
for
closure
and
post
closure
care.
The
current
cost
estimate
is
$1,431,360.00
as
stated
in
Permit
Application,
Log
No.
1996-240.
Within
90
days
of
the
date
of
this
permit,
the
operator
shall
provide
financial
assurance
in
the
amount
of
the
current
cost
estimate
as
required
by
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.603(b)
(1).
(Note:
prior
tothe
operation
of
the
gas
extraction
system
in
accordance
with
Special
Condition
1
of
this
permit,the
operator
shall
provide
financial
assurance
in
the
amount
of
$1,439,720.00)
25.
Respondent
was
required
by
special
condition
number
13
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
1996-240-SP,
to
provide
the
$1,431,360.00
in
financial
assurance
within
90
days
from
October
24,
1996
(January
22,
1997)
and
to
increase
this
amount
to
$1,439,720.00
prior
to
the
operation
of
the
gas
extraction
system.
26.
Respondent
did
not
increase
its
financial
assurance
to
$1,431,360.00
by
January
22,
1997
(90
days
from
October
24,
1996)
27.
Rspondent
did
notprovided
financial
assurance
in
the
amount
51
of
$1,439,720.00
prior
to
the
operation
of
the
gas
extraction
system.
28.
Respondent
provided
to
the
Illinois
EPA
a
rider
to
its
existing
performance
bond
that
increased
the
amount
of
financial
assurance
to
$1,439,720.00
on
September
1,
1999.
29.
Respondent,
by
its
conduct
described
herein,
violated
special
condition
number
13
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
l996-240-SP,
and
thereby,
also
violated
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998)
30.
Respondent
was
out
of
compliance
with
special
condition
number
13
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
1996-240-SP
and
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998)
from
January
22,
1997
until
September
1,
1999.
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
XIX:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act
and
special
condition
number
13
of
permit
number
l996-240-SP;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act
and
special
condition
number
13
of
permit
number
1996-240-SP;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
52
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
the
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
XX
VIOLATION
OF
PERNIT
CONDITION
1-20.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein,
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
20
of
this
Count
XX
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
21.
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
No
person
shall:
Conduct
any
waste-storage,
waste-treatment,
orwaste-
disposal
operation:
1.
without
a
permit
granted
by
the
Agency
or
in
violation
of
any
conditions
imposed
by
such
permit,
including
periodic
reports
and
full
access
to
adequate
records
and
the
inspection
of
facilities,
as
may
be
necessary
to
ensure
compliance
with
this
Act,
and
with
regulations
and
standards
adopted
thereunder.
.
22.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois,
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998)
23.
Refuse
is
waste
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.53
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.53
(1998)
24.
Special
condition
number
17
of
supplemental
development
53
permit
number
1989-005-SP,
provides,
in
pertinent
part,
as
follows:
Prior
to
placing
waste
material
in
any
Area,
a
registered
professional
engineer
shall
certify
that
the
floor
and/or
sidewall
liner
or
seal
has
been
developed
and
constructed
in
accordance
with
an
approved
plan
and
specifications.
Such
data
and
certification
shall
be
submitted
to
the
Agency
prior
to
placement
of
waste
in
the
areas
referenced
above.
No
wastes
shall
be
placed
in
those
areas
until
the
Agency
has
approved
the
certifications
and
issued
an
Operating
Permit.
25.
Respondent
was
required
by
special
condition
number
17
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
1996-240-SP,
to
get
an
Operating
Permit
and
Illinois
EPA
approval
based
on
a
professional
engineer’s
certification
before
placing
any
waste
materials
in
an
area
that
did
not
yet
have
this
approval.
26.
As
of
March
31,1999,
and
July
20,
1999,
and
continuing
until
at
least
thedate
of
filing
of
this
Second
Amended
Complaint,
or
to
a
date
or
dates
better
known
to
Respondent,
Respondent
was
placing
leachate,
a
waste,
in
areas
that
had
not
been
certified
or
approved
by
the
Illinois
EPA.
27.
Respondent,
by
its
conduct
described
herein,
has
and
continues
to
violate
special
condition
number
17
of
its
supplemental
development
permit
number
l989-005-SP,
and
thereby,
also
violates
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(1)
(1998)
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
XX:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
54
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
caused
or
allowed
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act
and
special
condition
number
17
of
permit
number
1989-005-SP;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Section
21(d)
(1)
of
the
Act
and
special
condition
number
17
of
permit
number
1989-005-SP;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
for
each
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
the
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
XXI
FAILURE
TO
PROVIDE
REVISED
COST
ESTIMATE
BY
DECEMBER
26,
1994
1-13.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein
paragraphs
1
through
13
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
13
of
this
Count
XXI
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
14.
Section
21.1(a)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21.1(a)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
a.
Except
as
provided
in
subsection
(a.5)
no
person
other
than
the
State
of
Illinois,
its
agencies
and
institutions,
or
a
unit
of
local
government
shall
conduct
any
waste
disposal
operation
on
or
after
March
1,
1985,
which
requires
a
permit
under
subsection
(d)
of
Section
21
of
this
Act,
unless
such
person
has
55
posted
with
the
Agency
a
performance
bond
or
other
security
for
the
purpose
of
insuring
closure
of
the
site
and
post-closure
care
in
accordance
with
this
Act
and
regulations
adopted
thereunder.
15.
Section
807.601(a)
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.601(a),
states
as
follows:
No
person
shall
conduct
a
waste
disposal
operation
or
indefinite
storage
operation
which
requires
a
permit
under
Section
21(d)
of
the
Act
unless
such
person
has
provided
financial
assurance
in
accordance
with
this
Subpart.
a)
The
financial
assurance
requirement
does
not
apply
to
the
State
of
Illinois,
its
agencies
and
institutions,
or
to
any
unit
of
local
government;
provided,
however,
that
any
other
persons
who
conduct
such
a
waste
disposal
operation
on
a
site
which
may
be
owned
or
operated
by
such
a
government
entity
must
provide
financial
assurance
for
closure
and
post-closure
care
of
the
site.
16.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois,
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998),
and
as
contemplated
by
Section
21.1(a)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21.1(a)
(1998)
17.
Section
807.623(a)
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.623
(a),
provides
as
follows:
a.
The
operator
must
revise
the
current
cost
estimate
at
least
once
every
two
years.
The
revised
current
cost
estimate
must
be
filed
on
or
before
the
second
anniversary
of
the
filing
or
last
revision
of
the
current
cost
estimate.
18.
Item
9
of
Respondent’s
supplemental
permit
dated
April
20,
1993,
provided
that
the
next
revised
cost
estimate
was
due
by
December
26,
1994.
19.
Respondent
failed
to
provided
a
revised
cost
estimate
by
56
December
26,
1994.
20.
On
July
26,1996,
Respondent
submitted
a
Supplemental
Permit
Application
for
the
gas
collection
and
recovery
system
and
included
a
revised
cost
estimate
in
the
amount
of
$1,431,360.00.
21.
By
failing
to
revise
the
cost
estimate
by
December
26,
1994,
as
required
by
the
April
20,
1993,
supplemental
permit,
Respondent
has
violated
Section
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(2)
(1998),
and
Section
807.623(a)
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.623(a).
22.
Respondent
was
out
of
compliance
with
Section
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(2)
(1998),
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.623(a)
from
December
26,
1994
until
July
26,
1996.
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
XXI:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
violated
Sections
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act,
and
Section
807.623(a),
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Sections
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act,
and
Sections
807.623(a),
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
57
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
its
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
COUNT
XXII
FAILURE
TO
PROVIDE
REVISED
COST
ESTIMATE
BY
JULY
26,
1998
1-13.
Complainant
realleges
and
incorporates
by
reference
herein
paragraphs
1
through
13
of
Count
I
as
paragraphs
1
through
13
of
this
Count
XXII
as
if
fully
set
forth
herein.
14.
Section
21.1(a)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21.1(a)
(1998),
provides
as
follows:
a.
Except
as
provided
in
subsection
(a.5)
no
person
other
than
the
State
of
Illinois,
its
agencies
and
institutions,
or
a
unit
of
local
government
shall
conduct
any
waste
disposal
operation
on
or
after
March
1,
1985,
which
requires
a
permit
under
subsection
(d)
of
Section
21
of
this
Act,
unless
such
person
has
posted
with
the
Agency
a
performance
bond
or
other
security
for
the
purpose
of
insuring
closure
of
the
site
and
post-closure
care
in
accordance
with
this
Act
and
regulations
adopted
thereunder.
15.
Section
807.601(a)
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Iii.
Adm.
Code
807.601(a),
states
as
follows:
No
person
shall
conduct
a
waste
disposal
operation
or
indefinite
storage
operation
which
requires
a
permit
under
Section
21(d)
of
the
Act
unless
such
person
has
provided
financial
assurance
in
accordance
with
this
Subpart.
a)
The
financial
assurance
requirement
does
notapply
to
the
State
of
Illinois,
its
agencies
and
institutions,
58
or
to
any
unit
of
local
government;
provided,
however,
that
any
other
persons
who
conduct
such
a
waste
disposal
operation
on
a
site
which
may
be
owned
or
operated
by
such
a
government
entity
must
provide
financial
assurance
forclosure
and
post-closure
care
of
the
site.
16.
Respondent,
a
corporation
which
operates
a
landfill
in
Illinois,
is
a
person
as
that
term
is
defined
at
Section
3.26
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/3.26
(1998),
and
as
contemplated
by
Section
21.1(a)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21.1(a)
(1998).
17.
Section
807.623(a)
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.623(a),
provides
as
follows:
a.
The
operator
must
revise
the
current
cost
estimate
at
least
once
every
two
years.
The
revised
current
cost
estimate
must
be
filed
on
or
before
the
second
anniversary
of
the
filing
or
last
revision
of
the
current
cost
estimate.
18.
On
July
26,
1996,
Respondent
submitted
a
Supplemental
Permit
Application
for
the
gas
collection
and
recovery
system
and
included
a
revised
cost
estimate
for
the
amount
of
$1,431,360.00.
19.
The
Respondent
was
required
to
provide
a
revised
cost
estimate
by
July
26,
1998
in
accordance
with
35
111.
Adm.
Code
807.623
(a)
20.
As
of
the
date
of
the
filing
of
this
Complaint,
Respondent
has
failed
to
provide
a
revised
cost
estimate
after
July
26,1998,
pursuant
to
the
requirements
set
forth
in
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
part
807.
21.
By
failing
to
revise
the
cost
estimate
by
July
26,
1998,
Respondent
has
violated
Section
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(2)
(1998),
and
Section
807.623(a)
of
the
Board
T
s
Waste
59
Disposal
Regulations,
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.623(a).
22.
Respondent
was
outof
compliance
with
Section
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act,
415
ILCS
5/21(d)
(2)
(1998),
35
Ill.
Adm.
Code
807.623(a)
from
July
26,
1998
and
continues
to
be
out
of
compliance.
WHEREFORE,
Complainant,
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
respectfully
requests
that
the
Board
enter
an
order
against
Respondent
CLC,
with
respect
to
Count
XXII:
1.
Authorizing
a
hearing
in
this
matter
at
which
time
the
Respondent
will
be
required
to
answer
the
allegations
herein;
2.
Finding
that
Respondent
has
violated
Sections
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act,
and
Section
807.623(a),
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations;
3.
Ordering
Respondent
to
cease
and
desist
from
any
further
violations
of
Sections
21(d)
(2)
of
the
Act,
and
Sections
807.623(a),
of
the
Board’s
Waste
Disposal
Regulations;
4.
Assessing
a
civil
penalty
of
Fifty
Thousand
Dollars
($50,000.00)
against
Respondent
for
each
violation,
and
an
additional
civil
penalty
of
Ten
Thousand
Dollars
($10,000.00)
per
day
of
violation;
5.
Requiring
Respondent
to
pay
all
costs,
including
expert
witness,
consultant
and
attorney
fees,
expended
by
the
State
in
its
pursuit
of
this
action;
and
6.
Granting
such
other
relief
as
the
Board
deems
appropriate.
60
PEOPLE
OF
THE
STATE
OF
ILLINOIS,
ex
rel.
JAMES
E.
RYAN,
Attorney
General
of
the
State
of
Illinois
MATTHEW
J.
DUNN,
Chief
Environmental
Enforcement/Asbestos
Litigation
Division
ROSEMJCAZEQChief
Environmental
Bureau
Assistant
Attorney
General
OF
COUNSEL:
MIKE
MACKOFF
JOEL
CABRERA
Assistant
Attorneys
General
100
West
Randolph
Street,
11th
Floor
Chicago,
IL
60601
(312)
814-2381
C:
\MyFiles\WPDOCS\CLC\PLEADING\2A1.IENDED.
CMP
wpd
61
I
—
t
I’
CERTIFICATE
OF
SERVICE
I,
Mike
Mackoff,
an
Assistant
Attorney
General
in
this
case,
hereby
certify
that
on
the
24th
day
of
November,
1999,
I
caused
to
be
served
byU.S.
Mail,
the
foregoing
Notice
of
Filing,
MotionFor
Leave
To
File
First
Amended
Complaint
and
First
Amended
Complaint
upon:
Mark
A.
LaRose,
Esq.
John
Knittle
Mark
A.
LaRose,
Ltd.
Hearing
Officer
734
North
Wells
Street
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
Chicago,
IL
60610
100
W.
Randolph
St.
11
th
Floor
Chicago,
IL
60601
by
placing
same
in
an
envelope
bearing
sufficient
postage,
and
depositing
same
with
the
United
States
Postal
Service
at
100
West
Randolph
Street,
Chicago,
Illinois,
and
to:
Dorothy
Gunn,
Clerk
Illinois
Pollution
Control
Board
James
R.
Thompson
Center
100
West
Randolph
Street
Chicago,
IL
60601
by
hand
delivery:
-
MIKE
CKOFF/