1. RECEIVE ID
      2. BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
      3. STATE OF ILLINOIS
      4. NOTICE OF MOTION
      5. PROOF OF SERVICE
      6. STATE OF IWNOIS
      7. RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
      8. PROOF OF SERVICE

CLERK’S
OFFICE
NOV 122003
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
BOAR&ATE
Pollution
OF
Control
IWNOIS
Board
MATE TECHNOLOGIES,
INC.
)
)
Complainant,
)
)
v.
)
PCB No. 2004-075
)
(Enforcement X)
F.T.C. AMERICA CORPORATION
)
)
Respondent.
)
APPEARANCE
I hereby file my appearance in this proceeding, on behalfof:
F.T.C. AMERICA CORPORATION.
y One of its Attorneys
JeremyA. Gibson
Mitchell S. Gibson
Masuda Funai Eifert & Mitchell
203 N. LaSalle Street, Suite2500
Chicago, IL 60601
312-245-7500

RECEIVE ID
CLERK’S OFFECE
NOV 122003
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Pollution Control
Board
MATE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
)
)
Complainant,
)
)
v.
)
PCB No. 2004-075.
)
(Enforcement X)
F.T.C. AMERICA CORPORATION
)
)
Respondent.
)
NOTICE OF MOTION
TO:
Carey S. Rosemarin
Law Offices ofCarey S. Rosemarin, P.C.
500 Skokie Boulevard, Suite 510
Northbrook, IL 60062
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on the 12th day of November, 2003 F.I.C AMERICA
CORPORATION, by and through its attorneys, Jeremy.A. Gibson and Mitchell Chaban ofM~suDA,
FUNAI, EIFERT
&
MITCHELL, LTD., shall file its RESPONDENT’S MOTION
FOR
EXTENSION
OF TIME
with the Office ofthe Clerk ofthe Pollution Control Board, a copy ofwhich is hereby
served upon you.
By One ofIts ttorneys
Jeremy A. Gibson
Mitchell S. Chaban
MASUDA, FuNAI, BIFERT
&
MITCHELL, LTD.
203 N.LaSalle Street, Suite 2500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 245-7500

PROOF OF SERVICE
I; the undersigned, do hereby state on oath that I served the foregoing
NOTICE OF MOTION
upon.Carey S. Rosemarin, Law Offices ofCarey S. Rosemarin, P.C. 500 Skokie Boulevard; Suite
510, Northbrook, IL 60062 by placing a copy ofthe same in a properly addressed, postage
prepaid, envelopes and depositing the same in the U.S. Mail Chute at One East Wacker Drive,
Chicago, Illinois 60601 on this
_____
day of
,
2003.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
)V7\ dayof
1~C~
(1~~LJ
2003.
Notary Public
1~c
Er’ri~c~Terregl
Seal
~

~EC~VED
CLERK’S OFFICE
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
Bd’~LD12
2003
STATE OF IWNOIS
MATE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
)
Pollution Control
Board.
)
Complainant,
)
)
v.
)
PCB No. 2004-075
)
(Enforcement X)
F.I.C. AMERICA CORPORATION
)
)
Respondent.
)
RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Respondent,
F.I.C.
AMERICA CORPORATION, by ancLthrough its attorneys,
Jeremy A. Gibson and Mitchell S. Chaban of Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd.,
pursuant to Section 101.522, and for its Motion for Extension ofTime, states as follows:
1.
Respondent was served with the Complaint in this matter on November
5,
2003. The Complaint asserts nine counts against Respondent for alleged violations of
various Illinois environmental laws.
2.
Respondent is presently investigating Complainant’s allegations and
analyzing the applicable law. Respondent anticipates filing a motion pursuant to Section
101.506 attacking the sufficiency ofthe Complaint with respect to most or all ofthe nine
counts alleged, including for purposes of “frivolous” complaints. Pursuant to Section
101.506,
Respondent would have to file said motion by or before December
5,
2003.
3.
Due to the following reasons, among others, Respondent will need
additional time beyond the 30 days provided for under Section 101.506 to prepare and
file the motion to dismiss:
(a)
The number of claims asserted in the Complaint;

(b)
The legal complexity of the solid waste, hazardous waste, air
emission and wastewater discharge statutes and regulations cited in the Complaint;
(c)
Counsel for Respondent is in the process of moving its offices
during the month of November 2003 and will not have adequate time to prepare the
motion within the time provided forunder Section 101.506; and
(d)
Respondent anticipates providing Complaint landlord an
opportunity to inspect the facility of concern in an attempt to resolve any disagreement
about its condition.
4.
Accordingly, Respondent requests an additional thirty (30) days, through
and including January
5,
2004, to file its motion to dismiss.
5.
The granting of this request for extension of time will not result in
material prejudice to the Complainant.
WHEREFORE, Respondent, F.T.C. AMERICA CORPORATION, respectfully
requests the hearing officer to enter an order extending the time for Respondent to file a
Motion to Dismiss under Section 101.506 for an additional 30 days through and including
January
5,
2004, and for such further relief as is appropriate.
Respectfully submitted,
One ofthe Attorneys for Respondent
Jeremy A. Gibson
Mitchell S. Chaban
Masuda, Funai, Eifert & Mitchell, Ltd.
One E. Wacker Drive, Suite 3200
Chicago, Illinois 60601
N:\SYSO9\6I85\Iit\61 850001,doc
2

PROOF OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, do hereby state on oath that I served the foregoing RESPONDENT’S
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
upon Carey S. Rosemarin, Law Offices ofCarey S.
Rosemarin, P.C. 500 Skokie Boulevard, Suite 510, Northbrook, IL 60062 by placing a copy of
the same in a properly addressed, postage prepaid, envelopes and depositing the same in the U.S.
Mail Chute at One East Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60601 on this
______
day of
_____________,2003.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
/3~
day of
I
‘1~TU’~b~
~t
2003.
-~L~
Notary Public
Seal
II
~
Terrell
~
Notar).
PuQt~C
State
of
lHpnois
N:\SYS23\2241\PROFSERV\6OO7OOO1.41~~Y
Co~i~s,~iExpires
08/14/07

Back to top