1. page 1
    2. page 2
    3. page 3
    4. page 4
    5. page 5
    6. page 6
    7. page 7
    8. page 8
    9. page 9
    10. page 10
    11. page 11
    12. page 12
    13. page 13
    14. page 14
    15. page 15
    16. page 16
    17. page 17
    18. page 18
    19. page 19
    20. page 20
    21. page 21
    22. page 22
    23. page 23
    24. page 24
    25. page 25
    26. page 26
    27. page 27
    28. page 28
    29. page 29
    30. page 30
    31. page 31
    32. page 32
    33. page 33
    34. page 34
    35. page 35
    36. page 36
    37. page 37
    38. page 38
    39. page 39
    40. page 40
    41. page 41
    42. page 42
    43. page 43
    44. page 44
    45. page 45
    46. page 46
    47. page 47
    48. page 48
    49. page 49
    50. page 50
    51. page 51
    52. page 52
    53. page 53
    54. page 54
    55. page 55
    56. page 56
    57. page 57
    58. page 58
    59. page 59
    60. page 60
    61. page 61
    62. page 62
    63. page 63
    64. page 64
    65. page 65
    66. page 66
    67. page 67
    68. page 68
    69. page 69
    70. page 70

 
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES
ILLINOIS REGISTER
1
06
4)
Statutory Authority : 415 ILCS 5/9 .10,27 and 28 .5 (2005)
5)
A Complete Description of the Subjects and Issues Involved : This rulemaking is
proposed to meet certain obligations of the State of Illinois under the Clean Air Act, 42
USC § 7401 et seq .; specifically, to satisfy Illinois' obligation to submit a State
Implementation Plan to address the requirements of the Clean Air Mercury Rule, 70 Fed .
Reg. 28606, and to address the applicable requirements of Section 9 .10 of the
Environmental Protection Act, 415 ILCS 5/9.10. This proposal will require Illinois coal-
fired EGUs that serve a generator greater than 25 megawatts producing electricity for sale
to begin to utilize control technology for mercury as necessary to achieve the numerical
standards set by the proposed rule beginning July 1, 2009. To achieve this goal while
1)
Heading of the Part : Control of Emissions from Large Combustion Sources
2)
Code Citation : 35 111 . Adm . Code Part 225
3)
Section Numbers :
Proposed Action:
225 .100
New
221120
New
221130
New
221140
New
225 .200
New
225.202
New
225.205
New
225.210
New
225.220
New
225.230
New
225 .232
New
225 .235
New
225
.237
New
225
.240
New
225 .250
New
225.260
New
225 .261
New
225 .263
New
225
.265
New
225 .270
New
225 .290
New
225.295
New

 
ILLINOIS REGISTER 2
06
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES
preserving flexibility, the regulations provide new and existing sources with two
alternative mercury emission standards to demonstrate compliance
. The first alternative
allows a source to comply with a mercury emission standard of 0 .0080 lb mercury/GWh
gross electrical output for each EGU . In the alternative, sources may control emissions
by a minimum of 90% from input mercury levels . In addition, through December 31,
2013, companies with several sources with EGUs may utilize averaging demonstrations
between the sources
. Those sources that have no sister plants are grouped into a co-op so
that they may also average amongst the listed facilities . However, every source in the
averaging demonstration must attain at least a 75% reduction of input mercury or 0 .020
lb mercury/GWh gross electrical output . This proposal also sets forth peiiiiitting,
monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements for affected sources .
6) ished studies or reports, and sources of underlying data, used to compose this
rulemaking The regulatory proposal included the Illinois EPA's Technical Support
Document for Reducing Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Generating Units
(TSD)
that relied on several published studies and reports . Copies of the documents the
Illinois EPA relied upon are available for review with the Pollution Control Board and
are listed below. The TSD includes an executive summary of the results from the
odel that was perfoinied by ICY Resources, Inc . contracted by the
Illi s The underlying data used to perform the modeling and the results are also
available or review at the Pollution Control Board .
Anderson, H.A.,
J.F. Amrhein, P . Shubat, and J . Hesse. Protocol for a uniform Great
Lakes sport fish consumption advisory . Great Lakes Fish Advisory Task Force Protocol
Drafting Committee . 1993 .
Berry, M ., Irvin, N., Monroe, L ., Bustard, J ., Lindsey, C ., Brignac, P ., Taylor, T
.,
Schlager, R., Sjostrom, S
., Starns, T., Chang, R ., O'Palko, A., 2004. "Field Test Program
for Long-Term Operation of a COHPACO System for Removing Mercury from Coal-
Fired Flue Gas", Presented at the Joint EPRI DOE EPA Combined Utility Air Pollution
Control Symposium, The Mega Symposium, August 31-September 2, 2004, Washington,
D.C.
Bier iann, J ., Higgins, B., Wendt, J.O., Senior, C ., Wang, D . "Mercury Reduction at a
Coal Fired Power Plant at over 2000 °F Using MinPlus Sorbent Through Furnace Sorbent
Injection", 2006 Electric Utilities Environmental Conference, Tucson, AZ, January 22-
25, 2006; Available online at http ://www.mobotecusa .com
Bustard, J . ; Durham, M. ; Lindsey, C.; Stares, T .; Baldrey, K.; Martin, C .
; Schlager, R
.;

 
ILLINOIS REGISTER
3
06
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES
Sjostrom, S .; Slye, R . ; Renninger, S . ; Monroe, L . ; Miller, R. ; Chang, R ., "Full-Scale
Evaluation of Mercury Control with Sorbent Injection and COHPAC at Alabama Power
E.C ., Gaston," DOE-EPRI-U .S
. EPA-A&WMA Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Mega
Symposium, Chicago, IL, August 20-23, 2001 .
Cain, Alex, U .S . Environmental Protection Agency Presentation, LADCO Mercury
Workshop, O'Hare International Center -Auditorium, Rosemont, Illinois, February 22,
2006.
Dombrowski, K., Richardson, C ., "Sorbent Injection for Small ESP Mercury Control in
Bituminous Coal Flue Gas", DOE/NETL's Mercury Control Technology R&D Program
Review, Pittsburgh, PA, July 12-13, 2005 .
Dombrowski, K., Richardson, C ., Machalek, T., Chapman, D ., Chang, R ., Monroe, L.,
Berry, M ., Irvin, N ., McBee, K ., Sjostrom, S ., "Sorbent Injection for Mercury Control
Upstream of Small-SCA ESPs", Presented at the Joint EPRI DOE EPA Combined Utility
Air Pollution Control Symposium, The Mega Symposium, August 31-September 2, 2004,
Washington, D .C.
n, "Advances in Mercury Control Technology", Pennsylvania Mercury Rule
oup Meeting, November 18, 2005 .
"Field Test Program for Long-Term Operation of a COHPAC® System for Removing
Mercury", DOE/NETL's Mercury Control Technology R&D Program Review,
, July 12-13, 2005 .
, N., "Brominated Sorbents : Effects on Emissions of Halogenated Air Toxics",
DOE/NETL's Mercury Control Technology R&D Program Review, Pittsburgh, PA, July
12-13, 2005 .
Illinois Department of Public Health . Environmental Health Fact Sheet - Fish Advisories
in Illinois . Illinois Department of Public Health, Division of Environmental Health,
Springfield, IL. 2006 .
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency . Illinois 2004 Section 303(d) List .
g
erg, E ., Yu-Ming, Mehta, A ., "The Passivation of Carbon for Improvement
rainment in Fly Ash Concrete",
e.gov/publications/proceedings/00/ubcOO/HURT .PD F

 
ILLINOIS REGISTER 4
06
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES
IEPAIBOW/04-005 . Bureau of Water, Watershed Management Section : Springfield, IL.
November 2004
.
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency . DRAFT
- Illinois Integrated Water Quality
Report and Section 303(d) list - 2006. Clean Water Act Sections 303(d), 305(b) and 314 .
Water Resource Assessment Infounation and Listing of Impaired Waters . Bureau of
Water, Watershed Management Section, Surface Water Section : Springfield, IL.
Institute of Clean Air Companies, "Status and Capabilities of Mercury Control
Technologies," Presentation to EPA Administrator Leavitt, Washington, D.C., July 20,
2004.
Jenkins, R.E., Burkhead, N.M., 1993. Freshwater Fishes of Virginia . American Fisheries
Society . Bethesda, Maryland . Pages 732-736.
Johnson, D ., Cummings, J ., "TOXECONTM Retrofitfor Mercury and Multi-Pollutant
Control", presentation on Clean Coal Power Initiative, downloaded from
www.netl
.doe.gov
Khan, S. and Srinivasachar, S ., "Field Demonstration of Enhanced Sorbent Injection for
Mercury Control", DOE-NETL, Mercury Control Program, Review Meeting, July 12,
2005.
Michigan Electric Utility Workgroup, "Final Report on Mercury Emissions from Coal-
Fired Power Plants", June 20, 2005 .
Migler, Paul, VanAten, Chris . "North American Power Plant Air Emissions . Commission
for Environmental Cooperation of North America, 2004 .
MinPlus Sorbent : Non Carbon Sorbent for Mercury Control in Coal Fired Boilers,
August 2005.
National Wildlife Federation, Getting the Job Done : Affordable Mercury Control at Coal-
Burning Power Plants, October 2004 .
Nelson, S., "Sorbent Technology for Mercury Control", Pennsylvania Mercury Rule
Workgroup Meeting, November 18, 2005 .
Nolan, P ., Downs, W., Bailey, R ., Vecci, S ., "Use of Sulfide Containing Liquors for
Removing Mercury from Flue Gases", U .S. Patent # 6,503,470, January 7, 2003 .

 
ILLINOIS REGISTER
5
06
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES
Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM), "Economic
Valuation of Human Health Benefits for Controlling Mercury Emissions from U
.S . Coal-
Fired Power Plants", February 2005 .
Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM), "Mercury
Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants . The Case for Regulatory Action," October
2003 .
Renninger, S., Farthing, G ., Ghorishi, S .B ., Teets, C ., Neureuter, J ., "Effects of SCR
Catalyst, Ammonia Injection and Sodium Hydrosulfide on the Speciation and Removal of
Mercury within a Forced-Oxidized Limestone Scrubber", Presented at the Joint EPRI
DOE EPA Combined Utility Air Pollution Control Symposium, The Mega Symposium,
August 31-September 2, 2004, Washington, D .C.
Richardson, C
., Machalek, T.,
Marsh, B., Miller, S ., Richardson, M ., Chang, R ., Strohfus
M
., Smokey, S.,
Hagley, T ., Juip G
., Rosvold, R ., "Chemical Addition for Mercury
Control in Flue Gas Derived from Western Coals" Presented at the Joint EPRI DOE EPA
Combined Utility Air Pollution Control Symposium, The Mega Symposium, May 19-22,
2003, Washington, D .C.
Rostam-Abadi, M., "Illinois Coal Properties In Regard to Mercury", ICCI Mercury
Meeting, Chicago, IL, November 9, 2005 .
U.S . Environmental Protection Agency. Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Clean Air
Mercury Rule . Final Report . EPA-452/R-05-003 . March 2005 .
Smith, Philip W . The Fishes of Illinois . University of Illinois Press . Pages 232-233 .
1979.
Srinivasachar, S ., Kang, S ., "Field Demonstration of Enhanced Sorbent Injection for
Mercury Control : Quarterly Technical Progress Report", Report Period : July 1 -
September 30, 2005, Prepared for U .S. Department of Energy National Energy
Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Under Contract DE-FC26-
04NT42306), November 8, 2005
.
Srivastava, R.K. ; Sedman, C.B.; Kilgroe, J.D., "Performance and cost of Mercury
Emission Control Technology Applications on Electric Utility Boilers," EPA-600/R-00-
083, September 2000 .

 
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES
Starns, T ., Amrhein, J., Martin, C ., Sjostrom, S ., Bullinger, C., Stockdill, D
., Strohfus,
TM
M ., Chang, R ., "Full-Scale Evaluation of TOXECON II on a Lignite-Fired Boiler",
Presented at the Joint EPRI DOE EPA Combined Utility Air Pollution Control
Symposium, The Mega Symposium, "August 31-September 2, 2004, Washington, D .C .
Staudt, J., "Mercury Allowances and Strategies : Peering Through the Mist", EUCI's
Navigating the Mercury Issue, October 19-20, 2005, Arlington, VA .
Staudt, J.,
Jozewicz, W ., "Performance and Cost of Mercury and Multipollutant Emission
Control Technology Applications on Electric Utility Boilers", EPA/600/R-03/110
; U.S
.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk
Management Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC, October 2003 .
Tran, P., Shore, L., Yang, X ., Hizny, W., Butz, J., "Mercury Control : Novel Non-Carbon
Sorbents", Power-Gen International, Las Vegas, NV, December 6-8, 2005 .
Trasande, L ., Landrigan, P ., Schechter, C
., "Public Health and Economic Consequences
of Mehtylmercury Toxicity to the Developing Brain," Environmental Health Perspective,
February 28, 2005
. Available online at http ://dx.doi.org
"Use of High-Carbon Illinois Fly Ash in Cement Manufacturing Demonstration Phase,"
ICCI Project Number : 99-1/2.1A-1 http ://www.icci.org/00final/bhatty99 .htm
U.S
. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR)
. 1999 . Toxicological Profile of Mercury . Public Health
Service, Atlanta, GA .
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
. Mercury Study Report to Congress. An
Inventory of Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions in the United States . Volume II (EPA-
452/R-97-004) ; December 1997 .
U.S
. Environmental Protection Agency Mercury Study Report to Congress, Execute
Summary. Volume I (EPA-US 2/R-97-003) ; December 1997 .
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
. Mercury Study Report to Congress. Health
Effects of Mercury and Mercury Compounds
. Volume V . (EPA-452/R-97-007) . 1997.
U.S
. Environmental Protection Agency. Mercury Study Report to Congress .
ILLINOIS REGISTER
6
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
06

 
ILLINOIS REGISTER 7
06
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES
Characterization of Human Health and Wildlife Risks from Mercury Exposure in the
United States. Vol . VII (EPA-452/R-97-009) . December 1997 .
U.S . Environmental Protection Agency, "Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired
Electric Utility Boilers : Interim Report", EPA-600/R-01-109, April 2002 .
U.S . Environmental Protection Agency, "Engineering and Economic Factors Affecting
the Installation of Control Technologies for Multipollutant Strategies", EPA-600/R-
02/073, October 2002 .
U.S . Environmental Protection Agency, "Study of Hazardous Air Pollutant Emissions
from Electric Utility Steam Generating Units
-
Final Report to Congress," EPA-453/R-
98-004, February 1998 .
U.S . Environmental Protection Agency, 2005, Air Pollution Prevention and Control
Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and
Develoment, "Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal Fired Electric Utility Boilers : An
Update", Research Triangle Park, NC, February 18, 2005 .
U.S . Environmental Protection Agency, Emission Generation Resource Grid (eGrid),
User's Manual, Prepared by E .H. Pechan & Associates Inc
., April 2003
; Available Online
at: ( http ://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/egrid/index .htm
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
. Guidance for 2006 Assessment, Listing and
Reporting Requirements Pursuant to Sections 303(d), 305(b) and 314 of the Clean Water
Act. Watershed Branch Assessment and Watershed Protection Division, Office of
Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Office of Water . July 29, 2005 .
U.S . Environmental Protection Agency . Office of Inspector General
. Evaluation Report .
Additional Analyses of Mercury Emissions Needed Before EPA Finalizes Rules for
Coal-Fired Electric Utilities . Report No . 2005-P-00003 . February 3, 2005 .
World Health Organization .
Methyl Mercury, Volume 101 . Distribution and Sales
Service, International Programme on Chemical Safety, Geneva, Switzerland
. 1990 .
California Environmental Protection Agency
. "Chemicals in Fish : Consumption of Fish
and Shellfish in California and the United States ." October 2001 .
Crelling, J . Dr ., Carty, R . Dr . "Prediction of Mercury Removal Efficiencies with Current

 
ILLINOIS REGISTER 8
06
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES
Coal Washing Practices ." Interim Final Technical Report
. September 1, 2004 through
August 31, 2005 .
Foerter, David C
. Institute of Clean Air Companies . Testimony Before the USEPA on
CAIR and CAMR. February 26, 2004 .
Illinois Department of Natural Resources . "2006 Illinois Fishing Information
." 2006.
Illinois Department of Public Health
. 2006. Environmental Health Fact Sheet - Fish
Advisories in Illinois
. Illinois Department of Public Health, Division of Environmental
Health, Springfield, IL
Nelson, Sid, Brickett, Lynn
. Large Scale Mercury Control Field Testing- Phase II .
"Advanced Utility Mercury-Sorbent Field Testing Program
." Progress Report . July 2005.
O'Palko, A ., Sjostrom, S ., Starns, T . "Evaluation of Sorbent Injection for Mercury
Control . NETL Meeting. July 12, 2005 .
Pellettieri . M.B., Hallenbeck, W.H.,
Brenniman, G .R., Cailas, M., Clark, M . "PCB Intake
from Sport Fishing Along the Northern Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan
." Environmental
Contamination and Toxicology. 1996 .
Princiotta, F.T., Technical Memorandum, Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired
Utility Boilers
. October 25, 2000 .
Srivastava, R.K., Staudt, James E ., Jozewicz, W
. "Preliminary Estimates of Performance
and Cost of Mercury Emission Control Technology Applications on Electric Utility
Boilers : An Update ."
U.S . Environmental Protection Agency
. Appendix B Background Material of
Methodology Used to Estimate 1999 National Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired
Electric Utility Boilers
. Electricity Utility Steam Generating Unit Mercury Emissions
Information Collection Effort . September 15, 2000 .
U.S. Geological Survey. "Coal Quality Information-Key to the Efficient and
Environmentally Sound Use of Coal
." February 9, 2006 .
7)
Will this rulemaking replace any emergency rule currently in effect?
No

 
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES
8)
Does this rulemaking contain an automatic repeal date? No
9)
Does this rulemaking contain incorporations by reference? Yes
10)
Are there any other proposed rules pending on this Part? No
11) Statement of Statewide Policy Objective : This rulemaking does not create or enlarge a
State mandate, as defined in Section 3(b) of the State Mandates Act . [30 ILCS 805/3(b)
(2004)] .
12)
Time, Place, and Manner in which interested persons may comment on this proposed
rulemaking: The Board will accept written public comment on this proposal for 45 days
after the date of publication in the Illinois Register
. Comments should reference Docket
R06-25 and be addressed to
:
Clerk's Office
Illinois Pollution Control Board
100 W. Randolph St ., Suite 11-500
Chicago, IL 60601
Interested persons may request copies of the Board's opinion and order by calling
Dorothy Gunn at 312-814-3620, or download from the Board's Web site at
www.ipcb.state.il.us.
For more information contact Marie Tipsord at 312/814-4925 or email at
tipsordm@ipcb
.state.il .us.
13)
Initial Regulatory Flexib lity Analysis :
A)
Types of small businesses, small municipalities and not for profit corporations
affected:
None
B)
Reporting, bookkeeping or other procedures required for compliance : The
proposed rulemaking requires the owner or operator of an affected source to
install required emissions monitoring systems, complete required certification
tests, and record, report, and quality-assure the data from such systems
. The
owner or operator of an affected source must also maintain emissions monitoring
information, submit quarterly reports, compliance certifications, and annual
certifications of compliance .

 
ILLINOIS REGISTER 10
06
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULES
C)
Types of Professional skills necessary for compliance
: No professional skills
beyond those currently required by the existing State and federal air pollution
control regulations applicable to affected sources will be required .
14)
Regulatory Agenda on which this rulemaking was summarized : January 2006
The full text of the Proposed Rules begins on the next page :

 
AUTHORITY :
Implementing Section 9 .10 and authorized by
Sections 27 and 28 .5 of
the Environmental
Protection Act [415 ILCS 5/9 .10, 27 and 28 .5] .
SOURCE : Adopted at 30 Ill
. Reg effective
SUBPART A
: GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 225 .100
Severability
If any Section, subsection or clause of this Part is found invalid, such finding
shall not affect the validity of this Part as a whole or any Section, subsection
or clause not found invalid .
Section 225 .120
Abbreviations and Acronyms
TITLE 35
: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
SUBTITLE B :
CHAPTER I :
AIR POLLUTION
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
SUBCHAPTER c
: EMISSION STANDARDS AND LIMITATIONS
FOR STATIONARY SOURCES
PART 225
CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM LARGE COMBUSTION SOURCES
SUBPART A :
Section
GENERAL PROVISIONS
225 .100
225 .120
225 .130
225 .140
Severability
Abbreviations and Acronyms
Definitions
Incorporations by Reference
SUBPART B :
CONTROL OF MERCURY EMISSIONS
FROM COAL-FIRED ELECTRIC GENERATING UNITS
Section
225 .200
Purpose
225 .202
Measurement Methods
225 .205
Applicability
225 .210
Compliance Requirements
I
225 .220
(CAAPP)
Clean Air Act Permit Program
Requirements
gPermit
225 .230
Emission Standards for EGUs at Existing Sources
225
.232
Averaging Demonstrations for Existing Sources
225 .235
Units Scheduled for Permanent Shut Down
225 .237
Emission Standards for New Sources with EGUs
225 .240
General Monitoring and Reporting Requirements
225 .250
Initial Certification and Recertification Procedures for Emissions
Monitoring
225 .260
Out of Control Periods for Emission Monitors
225 .261
Additional Requirements to Provide Heat Input Data
225 .263
Monitoring of Gross Electrical Output
225 .265
Coal Analysis for Input Mercury Levels
225 .270
Notifications
225 .290
Recordkeeping and Reporting
225 .295
Treatment of Mercury Allowances

 
Section 225 .130
Definitions
The definitions contained in this Section
apply only to the provisions of this
Part
. Unless otherwise defined hereiQD_this9__SectionQ
and unless a different
meaning of a term is clear from its context, the definitions of terms used in
this Part shall have the meanings specified for those terms in 35 Ill . Adm . Code
Pant-211 .
"Averaging demonstration" means, with regard to Subpart B of this Part, a
demonstration of compliance that is based on the combined performance of EGUs at
two or more sources .
"Boiler" means an enclosed fossil or other fuel-fired combustion device used to
produce heat and to transfer heat to recirculating water, steam, or other
medium .
"Bottoming-cycle cogeneration unit" means a cogeneration unit in which the
energy input to the unit is first used to produce useful thermal energy and at
least some of the reject heat from the useful thermal energy application or
process is then used for electricity production .
"Coal" means any solid fuel classified as anthracite, bituminous, subbituminous,
or lignite by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard
Specification for Classification of Coals by Rank D388-77, 90, 91, 95, 98a, or
99 (Reapproved 2004) .
"Coal-derived fuel" means any fuel (whether in a solid, liquid or gaseous state)
produced by the mechanical, thermal, or chemical process .
"Coal-fired" means combusting any amount of coal or coal-derived fuel, alone or
in combination with any amount of any other fuel, during a specified year
.
Unless otherwise specified within this Part,
shall be the same as those found in 35 Ill .
abbreviations and acronyms are used in this
the abbreviations used in this Part
Adm . Code 211
. The following
Part :
I
I
Act
Btu
CAA
CAAPP Clean
C02
Environmental Protection Act [415 ILCS 57AL-7:
British thermal unit
Clean Air Act [42 TwF~Q-USC 7401 et seq .]
Air Act Permit Program
carbon dioxide
EGU
GWh
hr
lb
MW
MWe
MWh
box
02
electric
gigawatt
hour
pound
megawatt
megawatt
megawatt
nitrogen
oxygen
generating unit
hour
electrical
hour
oxides
RATA
S02
relative
accuracy test audit
sulfur dioxide
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency

 
"Cogeneration unit" means a stationary, fossil fuel-fired boiler or stationary,
fossil fuel-fired combustion turbine :
Having equipment used to produce electricity and useful thermal energy for
industrial, commercial, heating, or cooling purposes through the sequential use
of energy
; and
Producing during the 12-month period starting on the date the unit first
produces electricity and during any calendar year after the calendar year in
which the unit first produces electricity :
For a topping-cycle cogeneration unit y_=
Useful thermal energy not less than 5 percent of total energy output
; and
Useful power that, when added to one-half of useful thermal energy produced, is
not less
theRthan
42 .5 percent of total energy input, if useful thermal energy
produced is 15 percent or more of total energy output, or not less than 45
percent of total energy input, if useful thermal energy produced is less than 15
percent of total energy output .
For a bottoming-cycle cogeneration unit, useful power not less than 45 percent
of total energy input .
"Combustion turbine" means=
An enclosed device comprising a compressor, a combustor, and a turbine and in
which the flue gas resulting from the combustion of fuel in the combustor passes
through the turbine, rotating the turbine ; and
If the enclosed device under the above paragraph of this definition is combined
cycle, any associated heat recovery steam generator and steam turbine
.
"Commence commercial operation" means, with regard to Subpart B of this Part,
with regard to an Electric Generating Unit that serves a generator, to have
begun to produce steam, gas, or other heated medium used to generate electricity
for sale or use, including test generation
. Such date shall remain the unit's
date of commencement of operation even if the Electric Generating Unit is
subsequently modified, reconstructed or repowered
.
"Designated representative" means, with regard to Subpart B of this Part, the
same as defined in 40 CFR 60
.4102 .
"Flue" means a conduit or duct through which gases or other matter is exhausted
to the atmosphere .
"Gross electrical output" means the total electrical output from an Electric
Generating Unit before making any deductions for energy output used in any way
related to the production of energy
. For an Electric Generating Unit generating
only electricity, the gross electrical output is the output from the
turbine/generator set .
"Input mercury" means the mass of mercury that is contained in the coal
combusted within an Electric Generating Unit .

 
"Nameplate capacity"
means, starting from the initial installation of a
generator, the maximum electrical generating
output (in MWe) that the generator
is capable of producing on a steady-state basis and during continuous operation
(when not restricted by seasonal or other deratings) as specified by the
manufacturer of the generator or, starting from the completion of any subsequent
physical change in the generator resulting in an increase in the maximum
electrical generating output (in MWe) that the generator is capable of producing
on a steady-state basis and during continuous operation (when not restricted by
seasonal or other deratings), such increased maximum amount as specified by the
person conducting the physical change .
"Output-based emission standard" means, with regard to Subpart B of this Part, a
maximum allowable rate of emissions of mercury per unit of gross electrical
output from an Electric Generating Unit
.
"Repowered" means, with regard to an EGU, replacement of a coal-fired boiler
with one of the following coal-fired technologies at the same source as the
coal-fired boiler :
Atmospheric or pressurized fluidized bed combustion ;
Integrated gasification combined cycle ;
Magnetohydrodynamics ;
Direct and indirect coal-fired turbines
;
Integrated gasification fuel cells ; or
As determined by the USEPA in consultation with the United States Department of
Energy, a derivative of one or more of the technologies under this definition
other coal-fired technology capable of controlling multiple combustion
emissions simultaneously with improved boiler or generation efficiency and with
significantly greater waste reduction relative to the performance of technology
in widespread commercial use as of January 1, 2005
.
nth basis" means, with regard to Subpart B of this Part, a
ade on a monthly basis from the relevant data for a particular
nd the preceding 11 calendar months (total of 12 months of
:a), with two exceptions .
For determinations involving one EGU, calendar
months in which the EGU does not operate (zero EGU operating hours) shall not be
included in the determination, and shall be replaced by a preceding month or
months in which the EGU does operate, so that the determination is still based
on 12 months of data . For determinations involving two or more EGUs, calendar
months in which none of the EGUs covered by the determination operates (zero EGU
operating hours) shall not be included in the determination, and shall be
replaced by preceding months in which at least one of the EGU covered by the
determination does operate, so that the determination is still based on 12
months of data .
Section 225 .140
Incorporations by Reference
The following materials are incorporated by reference . These incorporations do
not include any later amendments or editions
.
a)
40 CFR Pa-r4-60, § 60 .17, § 60 .45a, § 60 .49a(k)(1), § 60 .49a(p), §
60 .50a(h), and §§ 60
.4170 through 60 .4176 (2005) .

 
b)
40 CFR Pan,-75 (2005) .
c)
ASTM
. American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive,
P .O
. Box C700, West Conshohocken r PA. 19428-2454P
(610) 832-9585 :
1)
ASTM D388-77, 90, 91, 95, 98a, or 99, Classification of Coals by Rank
(Reapproved 2004) .
2)
ASTM D3173-03, Standard Test Method for Moisture in the Analysis Sample of
Coal and Coke (Approved April 10, 2003) .
3)
ASTM D3684-01, Standard Test Method for Total Mercury in Coal by the
Oxygen Bomb Combustion/Atomic Absorption Method (Approved October 10, 2001)
.
4)
ASTM D5865-04, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal and
Coke (Approved April 1, 2004) .
5)
ASTM D6414-01, Standard Test Method for Total Mercury in Coal and Coal
Combustion Residues by Acid Extraction or Wet Oxidation/Cold Vapor Atomic
Absorption (Approved October 10, 2001) .
6)
ASTM D6784-02, Standard Test Method for Elemental, Oxidized,
tide-Bound and Total Mercury in Flue Gas Generated from Coal-Fired
Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro Method) (Approved April 10, 2002) .
SUBPART B
: CONTROL OF MERCURY EMISSIONS
FROM COAL-FIRED ELECTRIC GENERATING UNITS
Section 225 .200
Purpose
e purpose of this Subpart is to control the emissions of mercury from coal-
fired electrical generating units in Illinois .
Section 225 .202
Measurement Methods
Measureme
a)
of mercury shall be according to the following
:
mission monitoring pursuant to 40 CFR Part-75 (2005) .
b)
ASTM D3173-03, Standard Test Method for Moisture in the Analysis Sample of
Coal and Coke (Approved April 10, 2003) .
c)
ASTM D3684-01, Standard Test Method for Total Mercury in Coal by the
Oxygen Bomb Combustion/Atomic Absorption Method (Approved October 10, 2001)
.
d)
ASTM D5865-04, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal and
Coke (Approved April 1, 2004) .
e)
ASTM D6414-01, Standard Test Method for Total Mercury in Coal and Coal
Combustion Residues by Acid Extraction or Wet Oxidation/Cold Vapor Atomic
Absorption (Approved October 10, 2001) .
f)
ASTM D6784-02, Standard Test Method for Elemental, Oxidized,
Particle-Bound and Total Mercury in Flue Gas Generated from Coal-Fired
Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro Method) (Approved April 10, 2002)
.

 
Section 225 .205 Applicability
The
following stationary coal-fired boilers and stationary coal-fired combustion
turbines are EGUs and are subject to this Subpart
:
a)
Except as provided in subsection (b) of this Section, a unit servingg at
any time since the start-up of the unit's combustion chamber, a generator with
nameplate capacity of more than 25 MWe producing electricity for sale
.
b)
For a unit that qualifies as a cogeneration unit during the 12-month
period starting on the date the unit first produces electricity and continues to
qualify as a cogeneration unit, a cogeneration unit serving at any time a
generator with nameplate capacity of more than 25 MWe and supplying in any
calendar year more than one-third of the unit's potential electric output
capacity or 219,000 MWh, whichever is greater, to any utility power distribution
system for sale
. If a unit qualifies as a cogeneration unit during the 12-month
period starting on the date the unit first produces electricity but subsequently
no longer qualifies as a cogeneration unit, the unit shall be subject to
subsection (a) of this Section starting on the day on which the unit first no
longer qualifies as a cogeneration unit
.
Section 225 .210
a)
Permit Requirements
The owner or operator of each source with one or more EGUs subject to this
Subpart at the source must apply for a CAAPP permit that addresses the
applicable requirements of this Subpart
.
b)
Monitoring Requirements
1)
The owner or operator of each source and each EGU at the source must
comply with the monitoring requirements of Sections 225
.240 through 225 .290 of
this S
2)
The compliance of each EGU with the mercury requirements under Sections
225 .230 and 225
.237 of this Subpart shall be determined by the emissions
measurements recorded and reported in accordance with Sections 225
.240 through
225
.290 of this Subpart .
c)
The
app
or
Compliance Requirements
-cury
Emission Reduction Requirements
or operator of any EGU subject to this Subpart shall comply with
requirements for control of mercury emissions under Section 225
.230
on 225
.237 of this Subpart .
d)
Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements
Unless otherwise provided, the owner or operator of a source with one or more
EGUs at the source shall keep on site at the source each of the documents listed
in subsections (d) (1) through (d) (3) of this Section for a period of five years
from the date the document is created . This period may be extended for cause,
at any time prior to the end of five years, in writing by the Agency .
1)
All emissions monitoring information, in accordance with Sections 225 .240
through 225 .290 of this Subpart .
2)
Copies of all reports, compliance certifications, and other submissions
and all records made or required or documents necessary to demonstrate
compliance with the requirements of this Subpart .

 
3)
Copies of all documents used
to complete a permit application and any
other submission under this Subpart .
e)
Liability
1)
The owner or operator of each source with one or more EGUs shall meet the
requirements of this Subpart .
2)
Any provision of this Subpart that applies to a source shall also apply to
the owner and operator of such source and to the owner and operator of each EGU
at the source
.
3)
Any provision of this Subpart that applies to an EGU shall also
apply to the owner and operator of such EGU
.
f)
Effect on Other Authorities . No provision of this Subpart shall be
construed as exempting or excluding the owner and operator of a source or EGU
from compliance with any other provision of an approved State Implementation
Plan, a permit, the Act, or the CAA .
Section 225 .220
Clean Air Act Permit Program (CAAPP) Permit Requirements
a)
Application Requirements
1)
Each source with one or more EGUs subject to the requirements of this
Subpart is required to submit a CAAPP permit application that addresses all
applicable requirements of this Subpart, applicable to each EGU at the source
.
2)
A4-
For EAK*Any.a2j
that commenced commercial operation
on or before December 31, 2008, the owner or operator of
EGU
must submit an initial permit application or application for CAAPP permit
modification that meets the requirements of this Section by December 31, 2008
.
B)
Fer any B
after December 31, 2008,
the owner or operator of any such EGU must submit an initial CAAPP permit
application or application for CAAPP modification that meets the requirements of
this Section not later than 180 days before initial startup of the
EGUU unless
the construction permit issued for the EGU addresses the requirements of this
Subpart .
b)
Contents of Permit Applications
In addition to other information required for a complete application for CAAPP
permit or CAAPP permit modification, the application shall include the following
information :
1)
The ORIS (Office of Regulatory Information Systems) or facility code
assigned to the source by the Energy Information Administration, if applicable
.
2)
Identification of each EGU at the source
.
3)
The intended approach to the monitoring requirements of Sections 225
.240
through 225
.290 of this Subpart .
4)
The intended approach to the mercury emission reduction requirements of
Section 225
.230 or 225 .237 of this Subpart, as applicable
.

 
c)
Permit Contents
1)
Each CAAPP permit issued by the Agency for a source with one or more EGUs
subject to the requirements of this Subpart shall contain federally enforceable
conditions addressing all applicable requirements of this Subpart, which
conditions shall be a complete and segregable portion of the source's entire
CAAPP permit .
2)
In addition to conditions related to the applicable requirements of this
Subpart, each such CAAPP permit shall also contain the information specified
under subsection (b) of this Section .
Section 225 .230
a)
Emission Standards for EGUs at Existing Sources
1)
Beginning July
1,
2009, the owner or operator of a source with one
or more EGUs subject to this Subpart that commenced commercial operation on or
before December 31, 2254.Z008 shall comply with one of the following standards
for each EGU on a rolling 12-month basis :
A)
An emission standard of 0 .0080 A mercury/GWh gross electrical output ; or
B)
A minimum 90-percent reduction of input mercury .
2) For an EGU complying with subsection (a) (1) (A) of this Section, the actual
mercury emission rate of the EGU for each 12-month rolling period, as monitored
in accordance with this Subpart and calculated as follows, shall not exceed the
applicable emission standard :
Where :
ER
Actual mercury emissions rate of the EGU for the particular 12-month
rolling period, expressed in lb/GWh .
Ei
Actual mercury emissions of the EGU, in lbs, in an individual month
in the 12-month rolling period, as determined in accordance with the emissions
monitoring provisions of this Subpart .
Oi
Gross electrical output of the EGU, in GWh, in an individual month
in the 12-month rolling period, as determined in accordance with Section 225 .263
of this Subpart .
3)
For an EGU complying with subsection (a) (1) (B) of this Section, the actual
control efficiency for mercury emissions achieved by the EGU for each 12-month
rolling period, as monitored in accordance with this Subpart and calculated as
follows, shall meet or exceed the applicable efficiency requirement :
Where :

 
CE
Actual control efficiency for mercury emissions of the EGU for the
particular 12-month rolling
period, expressed as a percent .
Ei
Actual mercury emissions of the EGU, in lbs, in an individual month
in the 12-month rolling period, as determined in accordance with the emissions
monitoring provisions of this Subpart .
Ii
Amount of mercury in the fuel fired in the EGU, in pounds, in an
individual month in the 12-month rolling period, as determined in accordance
with Section 225
.265 of this Subpart .
b)
fr.jM-qkT&z
0 MCOMMON~Mtw*M- NHN~FMMMMMI
rw* EMOYM~=RPHMOR
1)
As an alternative to compliance with one of the above emission standards
in subsection (a) of this Section, the owner or operator of the EGU may comply
with the emission standards of this Subpart by demonstrating that the actual
emissions of mercury from the EGU are less than the allowable emissions of
mercury from the EGU on a rolling 12-month basis
.
2)
For this purpose, for each rolling 12-month period, the actual emissions
of mercury from the EGU, as monitored in accordance with this Subpart, must not
exceed the allowable emissions of mercury from the EGU, as further provided by
the following formulas
:
Q2-n=AA1Z
E12=120SWOU
A12
Where=
12
:
Ai
al-a-1
E12
Actual mercury emissions of the EGU for the particular 12-
month rolling period .
A12
Allowable mercury emissions of the EGU for the particular 12-month
rolling period-
Ei
Actual mercury emissions of the EGU in an individual month in the
12-month rolling period .
Ai
Allowable mercury emissions of the EGU in an individual month in the
12-month rolling period, based on either the input mercury to the unit (Alnput
i) or the electrical output from the EGU (AOutput i), as selected by the owner
or operator of the EGU for that given month
.
Alnput 1-1-=
Allowable mercury emissions of the EGU in an individual month
based on the input mercury to the EGU, calculated as 10
.0 percent (or 0 .100) of
the input mercury to the EGU
.
AOutput -i--T-=
Allowable mercury emissions of the EGU in a particular month
based on the electrical output from the EGU, calculated as the product of the
output based mercury limit, i .e ., 0
.0080 lb/GWh, and the electrical output from
the EGU, in GWh .
3)
If the owner or operator of an EGU does not conduct the necessary
sampling, analysis, and recordkeeping, in accordance with Section 225
.265 of
this Subpart, to determine the mercury input to the EGU, the allowable emissions
of the EGU must be calculated based on the electrical output of the EGU .

 
C)
If two
or more EGUs are served by common stack(s) and the owner or
operator conducts monitoring for mercury emissions in the common stack(s), as
provided for by 40 CFR Pant-75, Subpart I, such that the mercury emissions of
each EGU are not determined separately, compliance of the EGUs with the
applicable emission standards of this Subpart shall be determined as if the EGUs
were a single EGU .
d) Alternative Emission Standards for Multiple ECUs
1)
As an alternative to compliance with the emission standards of subsection
(a) of this Section, the owner or operator of a source with an EGU may comply
with the emission standards of this Subpart by demonstrating that the actual
emissions of mercury from all EGUs at the source are less than the allowable
emissions of mercury from all EGUs at the source on a rolling 12-month basis .
2)
For this purpose, for each rolling 12-month period, the actual emissions
of mercury from all the EGUs at the source, as monitored in accordance with this
Subpart, must not exceed the sum of the allowable emissions of mercury from all
the EGUs at the source, as further provided by the following formulas :
ES=AS
ES=nEiSi
aS=nAiSi :-U
Where :
ES
Sum of the actual mercury emissions of the EGUs at the source .
AS
Sum of the allowable mercury emissions of the EGUs at the source .
Ei
Actual mercury emissions of an individual EGU at the source, as
determined in accordance with subsection (b) (2) of this Section .
Ai
Allowable mercury emissions of an individual EGU at the source, as
determined in accordance with subsection (b) (2) of this Section .
n
Number of EGUs covered by the demonstration .
3)
If an owner or operator of a source with two or more EGUs that is relying
on this subsection
(d
to demonstrate compliance fails to meet the requirements
of this subsection
Idl.in a given 12-month rolling period, all EGUs at such
source covered by the compliance demonstration are considered out of compliance
with the applicable emission standards of this Subpart for the entire last month
of that period .
Section 225 .232
Averaging Demonstrations for Existing Sources
a)
Through December 31, 2013, as an alternative to compliance with the
emission standards of Section 225
.230(a) of this Subpart, the owner or operator
of an EGU may comply with the emission standards of this Subpart by means of an
Averaging Demonstration (Demonstration) that shows that the actual emissions of
mercury from the EGU and other EGUs at the source and other EGUs at other
sources covered by the Demonstration are less than the allowable emissions of
mercury from all EGUs covered by the Demonstration on a rolling 12-month basis .

 
b)
The EGUs at each source covered by a Demonstration must also comply with
one of the following emission standards on a source-wide basis for the period
covered by the Demonstration
:
Illinois Power Cooperative/Marion Generating Station, ID 199856AAC) can only
participate in Demonstrations with other such owners or operators of a single
existing source of EGUs .
Va) Participation in Demonstrations under this Section by the owner or
operator of only a single existing source with EGUs must be authorized through
federally enforceable permit conditions for each such source participating in
the Demonstration .
e)
A source may be included in only one Demonstration during each rolling 12-
month period .
f)
The owner or operator of EGUs using Demonstrations to show compliance with
this Subpart must complete the determination of compliance for each 12-month
rolling period no later than 60 days following the end of the period .
g)
If averaging is used to demonstrate compliance with this Subpart, the
effect of a failure to demonstrate compliance shall be that the compliance
status of each source shall be determined under Section 225
.230 of this Subpart
as if the sources were not covered by a Demonstration
.
h)
For purposes of this Section, if the owner or operator of any source that
participates in a Demonstration with an owner or operator of a source that does
not maintain the required records, data, and reports for the EGUs at the source,
or does not submit copies of such records, data, or reports to the Agency upon
request, then the effect of this failure will be deemed to be a failure to
demonstrate compliance and the compliance status of each source shall be
determined under Section 225
.230 of this Subpart as if the sources were not
covered by a Demonstration .
Section 225 .235
Units Scheduled for Permanent Shut Down
I
1)
2)
An emission standard of 0 .020 lb mercury/GWh gross electrical output
; or
A minimum 75- percent reduction of input mercury .
c)
For the purpose of this Section, compliance shall be determined using the
equations in Section 225
.230(a)(2), (a)(3), or (d) (2) of this Subpart, as
applicable, addressing all EGUs at the sources covered by the Demonstration,
rather than only EGUs at one source .
I
d)
Limitations on Demonstrations
I
The owners or operators of more than one existing source with
EGUs can only participate in Demonstrations that include other existing sources
that they own or operate
.
I
2)
Sinale Existina Source Demonstrations
I
a)
The owner or operator of only a single existing source with EGUs (i .e .,
City,
Water, Light & Power, City of Springfield, ID 167120AAD ; Electric Energy,
Inc ., ID 127855AAC
; Kincaid Generating Station, ID 021814AAB ; and Southern

 
a)
The emission standards of Section 225
.230(a) of this Subpart are not
applicable to an EGU that will be permanently shut down as
b-e4-e-w
1)
The owner or operator
of an EGU for which this Section is being relied
upon shall by no later than June 30, 2009
:
A)
Have notified the Illinois EPA that it is planning to permanently shut
down the EGU by the applicable date
specified in subsection (a) (3) or (4) of
this Section . This notification shall be accompanied by a description of the
actions that have already been taken to allow the shut down of the
EGU and a
description of the future actions that must be accomplished to complete the shut
down of the EGU,
with the anticipated schedule for those actions and the
anticipated date of permanent whoodewFahul-down
of the unit .
B)
Have applied for a construction permit or be actively pursuing a federally
enforceable agreement that requires the
EGU to be permanently shut down in
accordance with this Section .
C)
Have applied for revisions to the operating permit(s) for the EGU
to
include provisions that terminate the authorization to operate the unit in
accordance with this Section .
2)
The owner or operator of an EGU for which this Section is being relied
upon shall by no later than June 30, 2010
:
A)
Have obtained a construction permit or entered into a federally
enforceable agreement as addressed by subsection (a) (1) (B) of this Section
; or
B)
Have obtained revised operating permit(s) in accordance with subsection
(a) (1) (C) of this Section .
3)
The plan for permanent shut down of the EGU must provide for the EGU to be
permanently shut down by no later than the applicable date specified below
:
A)
If the owner or operator of the EGU is not constructing a new
EGU
or other
generating units to specifically replace the existing EGU, by December 31, 2010 .
B)
If the owner or operator of the EGU
is constructing a new EGU or other
generating units to specifically replace the existing EGU, by December 31, 2011
.
4)
The owner or operator of the EGU
must permanently shut down the EGU by the
date specified in subsection (a) (3) of this Section, unless the owner or
operator submits a demonstration to the Illinois EPA before such date showing
that circumstances beyond its reasonable control (such as protracted delays in
construction activity, unanticipated outage of another EGU, or protracted
shakedown of a replacement unit) have occurred that interfere with the plan for
permanent shut down of the EGU, in which case the date for shut down of the EGU
may be extended as follows
:
A)
If the owner or operator of the EGU
is not constructing a new EGU or other
generating units to specifically replace the existing EGU,
for up to one year,
i .e .,
permanent shut down of the EGU to occur by no later than December 31,
2011 .
B)
If the owner or operator of the EGU is constructing a new EGU or other
generating units to specifically replace the existing EGU, for up to 18 months,

 
i .e ., permanent
shutdown of the EGU to occur by no later than June 30,
12l3, 013 : provided, however, that after December 31, 2012, the existing EGU
shall only operate as a back-up unit to address periods when the new generating
units are not in service
.
b)
Notwithstanding Sections 225
.230 and 225 .232 of this Subpart, any EGU that
is not required to comply with Section 225
.230 of this Subpart pursuant to this
Section shall not be included when determining whether any other EGUs at the
source or other sources are in compliance with Section 225 .230 of this Subpart .
C)
If an EGUU for which the owner or operator of the source has relied upon
this Section in lieu of complying with Section 225 .230(a) of this Subpartt is
not permanently shut down as required by this Section, the EGU shall be
considered to be a new EGU subject to the emission standards in Section
225
.237(a) of this Subpart beginning in the month after the EGU was required to
be permanently shut down, in addition to any other penalties that may be imposed
for failure to permanently shut down the EGU in accordance with this Section .
Section 225 .237
Emission Standards for New Sources with EGUs
a)
Standards
1)
The owner or operator of a source with one or more EGUs, but that
previously had not had any EGUs that commenced commercial operation before
January 1, 2009, shall comply with one of the following emission standards for
each EGU on a rolling 12-month basis
:
A)
An emission standard of 0 .0080 lb mercury/GWh gross electrical output
; or
B)
A minimum 90- percent reduction of input mercury .
2)
Section 225
.230(a)(2), (a)(3), or
b)
purpose, compliance may be demonstrated using the equations in
The initial 12-month rolling period for which compliance with the emission
standards of subsection (a) (1) of this Section must be demonstrated for a new
mence on the date that the initial performance test for the mercury
emission standard under 40 CFR 60
.45a also commences . The continuous emission
monitoring systems required by this Subpart for mercury emissions from the EGU
must be certified prior to this date . Thereafter, compliance shall be
demonstrated on a rolling-12 month basis in terms of calendar months .
General Mon
er or operator of an EGU shall comply with the monitoring, recordkeeping,
eporting requirements as provided in this Section, Sections 225 .250 through
0 of this Subpart, and Subpart I of 40
CFR-Part 75 . If the EGU utilizes a
ommon stack with units that are not EGUs and the owner or operator of the EGU
does not conduct emissions monitoring in the duct to the common stack from each
,
the owner or operator of the EGU shall conduct emissions monitoring in
accordance with 40 CFR 75
.82(b)(2) and this Section, including monitoring in the
duct to the common stack from each unit that is not an EGU, unless the owner or
operator of the EGU counts the combined emissions measured at the common stack
as the mass emissions of mercury for the EGUs for recordkeeping and compliance
purposes .
0
(b) (2) of this Subpart .
g and Reporting Requirements

 
a)
Requirements for installation, certification, and data accounting .
The
owner or operator
of each EGU shall :
1)
Install all monitoring systems
required under this Section and Sections
225 .250 through 225 .290 of this Subpart for monitoring mercury mass emissions
(including all systems required to monitor mercury concentration, stack gas
moisture content, stack gas flow rate, and C02 or 02 concentration, as
applicable, in accordance with 40 CFR 75
.81 and 75 .82) ;-
2)
Successfully complete all certification tests required under Section
225
.250 and meet all other requirements of this Section, Sections 225 .250
through 225
.290 of this Subpart, and Subpart I of 40 CFR Part-75 applicable to
the monitoring systems required under subsection (a) (1) of this Section-T,---a-an
d.
3)
Record, report, and quality-assure the data from the monitoring systems
required under subsection (a) (1) of this Section
.
4)
If the owner or operator elects to use the low mass emissions excepted
monitoring methodology for an EGU that emits no more than 464 ounces (29 pounds)
of mercury per year pursuant to 40 CFR 75
.81(b), also perform emissions testing
in accordance with 40 CFR 75 .81(c) to demonstrate that the EGU is eligible to
use this excepted emissions monitoring methodology. a s
well as comply with all
other applicable requirements of 40 CFR 75 .81(b) through (f), and submit a copy
of any information required to be submitted to the USEPA under these provisions
to the Illinois EPA
. The initial emissions testing to demonstrate eligibility
of an EGU for the low mass emissions excepted methodology shall be conducted by
the following dates :
A)
If the EGU has commenced commercial operation before July 1, 2008, at
least by January 1, 2009, or 45 days prior to relying on the low mass emissions
excepted methodology, whichever date is later .
B)
If the EGU has commenced commercial operation on or after July 1, 2008, at
least 45 days prior to the applicable date specified under subsection (b) (2) of
this Section or 45 days prior to relying on the low mass emissions excepted
methodology, whichever date is later-
b)
Emissions menitering deadlinesMonitoring -Deadlines
. The owner or operator
shall meet the emissions monitoring system certification and other emissions
monitoring requirements of subsections (a) (1) and (a) (2) of this Section on or
before the following dates
. The owner or operator shall record, report, and
quality-assure the data from the emissions monitoring systems required under
subsection (a) (1) of this Section on and after the following dates :
1)
For the owner or operator of an EGU that commences commercial operation
before July 1, 2008, by January 1, 2009 .
2)
For the owner or operator of an EGU that commences commercial operation on
or after July 1, 2008, by 90 unit operating days or 180 calendar days, whichever
occurs first, after the date on which the EGU commences commercial operation .
3)
For the owner or operator of an EGU for which construction of a new stack
or flue or installation of add-on mercury emission controls, a flue gas
desulfurization system, a selective catalytic reduction system, a fabric filter,
or a compact hybrid particulate collector system is completed after the
applicable deadline under subsection (b) (1) or (2) of this Section, by 90 unit
operating days or 180 calendar days, whichever occurs first, after the date on

 
which emissions
first exit to the atmosphere
through
the new stack
or flue, add-
on mercury emissions controls, flue gas desulfurization system, selective
catalytic reduction system,--a fabric filter, or compact hybrid particulate
collector system .
C)
Reporting da0t_Qat"
1)
Except as provided in subsection (c) (2) of this Section, the owner or
operator of an EGU that does not meet the applicable emissions monitoring date
set forth in subsection (b) of this Section for any emissions monitoring system
required under subsection (a) (1) of this Section shall, for each such monitoring
system, determine, record, and report maximum potential (or, as appropriate,
minimum potential) values for mercury concentration, stack gas flow rate, stack
gas moisture content, and any other parameters required to determine mercury
mass emissions in accordance with 40 CFR 75
.80(g) .
2)
The owner or operator of an EGU that does not meet the applicable
emissions monitoring date set forth in subsection (b) (3) of this Section for any
emissions monitoring system required under subsection (a) (1) of this Section
shall, for each such monitoring system, determine, record, and report substitute
data using the applicable missing data procedures in 40 CFR 75
.80(f), in lieu of
the maximum potential (or, as appropriate, minimum potential) values
; for a
eterr
if the owner or operator demonstrates that there is continuity
ween the data streams for that parameter before and after the construction or
stallation under subsection (b) (3) of this Section .
d)
Prohibitions
1)
No owner or operator of an EGU shall use any alternative emissions
monitoring system, alternative reference method for measuring emissions, or any
other alternative to the emissions monitoring and measurement requirements of
this Section and Sections 225
.250 through 225 .290 of this Subpart, unless such
alternative is promulgated by the USEPA and approved in writing by the Agency or
the use of such alternative is approved in writing by the Agency and USEPA
.
2)
No owner or operator of an EGU shall operate the EGU so as to discharge,
or allow to be discharged, mercury emissions to the atmosphere without
accounting for all such emissions in accordance with the applicable provisions
of this Section, Sections 225
.250 through 225
.290 of this Subpart, and Subpart I
of 40 CFR Paro-75 .
3)
No owner or operator of an EGU shall disrupt the continuous emission
monitoring system, any portion thereof, or any other approved emission
monitoring method, and thereby avoid monitoring and recording mercury mass
emissions discharged into the atmosphere, except for periods of recertification
or periods when calibration, quality assurance testing, or maintenance is
performed in accordance with the applicable provisions of this Section, Sections
225 .250 through 225
.290 of this Subpart, and Subpart I of 40 CFR Poo l-75 .
4)
No owner or operator of an EGU shall retire or permanently discontinue use
of the continuous emission monitoring system or any component thereof, or any
other approved monitoring system under this Subpart, except under any one of the
following circumstances :
A)
The owner or operator is monitoring emissions from the EGU with another
certified monitoring system that has been approved, in accordance with the
applicable provisions of this Section, Sections 225
.250 through 225 .290 of this

 
Subpart, and Subpart I of 40 CFR Tont-75, by the Agency for use at that EGU and
that provides emission data for the same pollutant or parameter as the retired
or discontinued monitoring system ; or
B)
The owner or operator or designated representative submits notification of
the date of certification testing of a replacement monitoring system for the
retired or discontinued monitoring system in accordance with Section
225
.250 (a) (3) (A) of this Subpart .
e)
Long-term eeld sterwy4- & -Storage
The owner or operator of an EGU that is in long-term cold storage is subject to
the applicable provisions of 40 CFR P,-t-75
for monitoring, recordkeeping, and
reporting for units in long-term cold storage .
Section 225 .250
Initial Certification and Recertification Procedures for
Emissions Monitoring
a)
The owner or operator of an EGU shall comply with the following initial
certification and recertification procedures for a continuous emissions
monitoring system (i .e .,
a continuous emission monitoring system or an excepted
monitoring system (sorbent trap monitoring system) under 40 CFR 75 .15) required
and
by Section
for which
225the
.240(a)(1)owner
or
. The
operator
owner
elects
or operator
to use,
of
the
an EGU
low
that
mass
qualifies
emissions
for
.
excepted methodology under 40 CFR 75
.81(b) shall comply with the procedures in
subsection (c) of this Section .
1)
Requirements for initial eertifleatle
The owner or
operator of an EGU shall ensure thatt for each continuous emissions monitoring
system required by Section 225 .240 (a) (1) of this Subpart (including the
automated data acquisition and handling system)) the owner or operator
successfully completes all of the initial certification testing required under
40 CFR 75
.80(d) by the applicable deadline in Section 225 .240(b) of this
Subpart . In addition, whenever the owner or operator of an EGU installs a
monitoring system to meet the requirements of this Subpart in a location where
no such monitoring system was previously installed, the owner or operator must
successfully complete the initial certification requirements of 40 CFR 75
.80(d) .
I
2)
Requirements for Whenever the owner or
operator of an EGU makes a replacement, modification, or change in any certified
continuous emission monitoring system, or an excepted monitoring system (sorbent
trap monitoring system) under 40 CFR 75 .15, and required by Section
225 .240 (a) (1) of this Subpart, that may significantly affect the ability of the
system to accurately measure or record mercury mass emissions or heat input rate
or to meet the quality-assurance and quality-control requirements of 40 CFR
75 .21 or Appendix B to 40 CFR-Part 75, the owner or operator of an EGU shall
recertify the monitoring system in accordance with 40 CFR 75 .20(b)
.
Furthermore, whenever the owner or operator of an EGU makes a replacement,
modification, or change to the flue gas handling system or the EGU's operation
that may significantly change the stack flow or concentration profile, the owner
or operator shall recertify each continuous emission monitoring system, and each
excepted monitoring system (sorbent trap monitoring system) under 40 CFR 75
.15,
whose accuracy is potentially affected by the change, all in accordance with 40
CFR 75 .20(b) . Examples of changes to a continuous emission monitoring system
that require recertification include replacement of the analyzer, complete
replacement of an existing continuous emission monitoring system, or change in
location or orientation of the sampling probe or site
.

 
Subsections (a) (3) (A)
through (D) of this Section apply to both initial certification and
recertification of a continuous monitoring system required by Section
225
.240(a)(1) of this Subpart . For recertifications, replace the words
"certification" and "initial certification" with the word "recertification
replace the word "certified" with the word nrecertified~,-", and follow the
procedures in 40 CFR 75
.20(b)(5) in lieu of the procedures in subsection
(a) (3) (E) of this Section
.
A)
Notification of eerVKeat!encertification - watin_c
..
The owner or operator shall
submit to the Agency, USEPA Region 5, and the Administrator of the USEPA written
notice of the dates of certification testing, in accordance with Section 225 .270
of this Subpart .
B)
Certification
The owner or operator shall submit
to the Agency a certification application for each monitoring system . A
complete certification application shall include the information specified in 40
CFR 75 .63 .
C)
Provisional eertifieatien
davaCe rtification Date . The provisional
certification date for a monitoring system shall be determined in accordance
with 40 CFR 75 .20 (a)(3) .
A provisionally certified monitoring system may be
used under this Subpart for a period not to exceed 120 days after receipt by the
Agency of the complete certification application for the monitoring system under
subsection (a) (3) (B) of this Section
. Data measured and recorded by the
provisionally certified monitoring system, in accordance with the requirements
of 40 CFR
Pat 75, will be considered valid quality-assured data (retroactive to
the date and time of provisional certification), provided that the Agency does
not invalidate the provisional certification by issuing a notice of disapproval
within 120 days efgftar
the date of receipt by the Agency of the complete
certification application .
D)
Certification appli
aten appreval preeess afin Aooroval Process .
The Agency will issue a written notice of approval or disapproval of the
certification application to the owner or operator within 120 days
Waftgr
receipt of the complete certification application required by subsection
(a) (3) (B) of this Section
. In the event the Agency does not issue such a notice
within sushthe
120-day period, each monitoring system that meets the applicable
performance requirements of 40 CFR Part-75 and is included in the certification
application will be deemed certified for use under this Subpart .
i)
Approval
If the certification application is complete and
shows that each monitoring system meets the applicable performance requirements
of 40 CFR Part-75, then the Agency will issue a written notice of approval of
the certification application within 120 days
ofAILgI receipt .
ii) Incomplete
1-T
eeAoolicationNo e . If the certification
application is not complete, then the Agency will issue a written notice of
incompleteness that sets a reasonable date by which the owner or operator must
submit the additional information required to complete the certification
application
. If the owner or operator does not comply with the notice of
incompleteness by the specified date, then the Agency may issue a notice of
disapproval under subsection (a) (3) (D) (iii) of this Section . The 120-day review
period shall not begin before receipt of a complete certification application .

 
I
iii)
Disapproval neoleen2till . If the certification application
shows
that any monitoring system does not meet the performance requirements of 40 CFR-
P,*O
75 or if the certification application is incomplete and the requirement
for disapproval under subsection (a) (3) (D)(ii) of this Section is met, then the
Agency will issue a written notice of disapproval of the certification
application . Upon issuance of such notice of disapproval, the provisional
certification is invalidated by the Agency and the data measured and recorded by
each uncertified monitoring system shall not be considered valid quality-assured
data beginning with the date and hour of provisional certification (as defined
under 40 CFR 75 .20(a)(3)) . The owner or operator shall follow the procedures
for loss of certification in subsection (a) (3) (E) of this Section for each
monitoring system that is disapproved for initial certification .
iv) Audit The
Agency may issue a notice of
disapproval of the certification status of a monitor in accordance with Section
225 .260(b) of this Subpart .
E)
b)
1)
If an emissions monitoring system has been previously certified in
accordance with 40 CFR Part-75 and the applicable quality assurance and quality
control requirements of 40 CFR 75 .21 and Appendix B to 40 CFR P*TN-7S are fully
met, the monitoring system shall be exempt from the initial certification
requirements of this Section .
Procedures for len*Lgaa of e-e*t?W-eaV?eRjqrtjfjqajjwn .
If the Agency
issues a notice of disapproval of a certification application under subsection
(a)
(3) (D) (iii) of this Section or a notice of disapproval of certification
tus under subsection (a) (3) (D)(iv) of this Section, then :
The owner or operator shall substitute the following values, for each
disapproved monitoring system, for each hour of EGU operation during the period
of invalid data specified under 40 CFR 75 .20 (a) (4) (iii) or 75 .21(e) and
continuing until the applicable date and hour specified under 40 CFR
75 .20(a)(5)(i) . For a disapproved mercury pollutant concentration monitor and
disapproved flow monitor, respectively, the maximum potential concentration of
mercury and the maximum potential flow rate, as defined in Sections 2 .1 .7 .1 and
sapproved moisture monitoring
ng system, respectively, the minim
he maximum potential C02 concentra
applicable), as defined in
.5, 2
.1 .3
.1, and 2
.1
.3 .2 of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part-
excepted monitoring system (sorbent trap monitoring
d disapproved flow monitor, respectively, the maximum potential
rion of mercury and maximum potential flow rate, as defined in Sections
of Appendix A to 40 CFR Part-75 .
2 .1 .4 .1 of Appendix A to 40 CPR Pant-75 .
system and disapproved diluent gas mor
potential moisture percentage and eithe
or the minimum potential 02 concentratioi
Sections 2 .
disapproved
a
0
m
0
iii)
The owner or operator shall repeat all certification tests or other
led by the monitoring system, as indicated in the
oval, no later than 30 unit operating days after the
tice of disapproval .

 
2) The
recertification provisions of this Section shall apply to an emissions
monitoring system required by Section 225 .240 (a) (1) of this Subpart exempt from
initial certification requirements under subsection (a) (1) of this Section .
c)
Initial certification and recertification procedures for EGUs using the
mercury low mass emissions excepted methodology under 40 CFR 75 .81(b) . The
owner or operator of an EGU qualified to use the mercury low mass emissions
excepted methodology under 40 CFR 75
.81(b) shall meet the applicable
certification and recertification requirements in 40 CFR 75
.81(c) through (f) .
d)
Certification Applications
. The owner or operator of an EGU shall submit
an application to the Agency within 45 days after completing all initial
certification or recertification tests required under this Section, includi
the information required under 40 CFR 75
.63 .
Section 225 .260
Out of Control Periods for Emission Monitors
a)
Whenever any emissions monitoring system fails to meet the quality-
assurance and quality-control requirements or data validation requirements of 40
CFR Part-75, data shall be substituted using the applicable missing data
procedures in Subparts D and I of 40 CFR Part-75 .
ssions monitoring s
recertification application
not have been certified or recertified
performance specification or other requ
Subpart or the applicable provisions of
initial certification or rece
cy wi
oring
ld
the notic
status of t
onitoring system shall not be considered
the date of issuance of the notification
Section 225 .26
Whenever both an audit of an
em and a review of the initial certification or
reveal that any emissions monitoring system should
because it did not meet a particular
irement under Section 225 .250 of this
40 CFR-PanN 75, both at the time of the
tion application submission and at the time
notice of disapproval of the certification
the purposes of this subsection, an audit
ir an audit of any information submitted to the
of disapproval, the Agency revokes prospectively
emissions monitoring system
. The data measured
valid quality-
of the revoked
g
certification status until the date and time that the owner or operator
completes subsequently approved initial certification or recertification tests
for the monitoring system
. The owner or operator shall follow the applicable
initial certification or recertificatio
Subpart for each disapproved monitoring
procedures in Section 225 .250 of this
system .
Additional Requirements to Provide Heat Input Data
The owner or operator of an EGU that monitors and reports mercury mass emissions
using a mercury concentration monitoring system and a flow monitoring system
shall also monitor and report heat input rate at the EGU level using the
procedures set forth in 40 CFR Pant-75 .
Section 225 .263
Monitoring of Gross Electrical Output
The owner or operator of an EGU complying with this Subpart by means of Section
225 .230 (a) (1) or using electrical output (0i) and complying by means of Section
225 .230(b) or (d) or Section 225
.232 of this Subpart shall monitor gross
electrical output of the associated generator(s) in MWh on an hourly basis .
Section 225
.265
Coal Analysis for Input Mercury Levels

 
a)
The owner or operator
of an EGU complying with this Subpart by means
of Section 225 .230 (a) (2) or using input mercury levels (Ii) and complying by
means of Section 225 .230(b) or (d) or Section 225 .232 of this Subpart shall
:
1)
Perform daily sampling of the coal combusted in the EGU for mercury
content
. The owner or operator of such EGU shall collect a minimum of one 2-lb
grab sample per day of operation from the belt feeders anywhere between the
crusher house or breaker building and the boiler . £S The sample shall be taken
in such a manner so as to provide a representative mercury content for the coal
burned on that day .
2)
Analyze the grab coal sample for the following :
A)
Determine the heat content using ASTM D5865-04 or equivalent approved in
writing by the Agency .
B)
Determine the moisture content using ASTM D3173-03 or equivalent approved
in writing by the Agency .
C)
Measure the mercury content using ASTM D6414-01, ASTM D3684-01, or
equivalent approved in writing by the Agency .
3)
The owner or operator of multiple EGUs at the same source using the same
crusher house or breaker building may take one sample per crusher house or
breaker building, rather than one per EGU .
4)
The owner or operator of an EGU shall use the data analyzed under
subsection (b) of this Section to determine the mercury content in terms of
lbs/trillion Bt
e
b)
The owner or operator of an EGU that must conduct sampling and analysis of
coal pursuant to subsection (a) of this Section ; shall begin such activity by
the following date :
1)
If the EGU is in daily service, at least 30 days before the start of the
month for which such activity will be required .
ner
notice to the
up of EGUs m
CFR 75 .82(b)(2)
Section 225 .290
a) General
A not in daily service, on the day that the EGU resumes
or of a source with one or more EGUs shall submit written
cy according to the provisions in 40 CFR 75 .61 for each EGU or
tored at a common stack and each non-EGU monitored under 40
Recordkeeping and Reporting
I
1)
The owner or operator of an EGU and its designated representative shall
comply with all applicable recordkeeping and reporting requirements in this
Section and with all applicable recordkeeping and reporting requirements of 40
CFR 75 .84 .

 
2)
The owner or operator of an EGU shall maintain records for each month
identifying the emission standard in Section 225 .230(a) or 225 .237(a) of this
Section with which it is complying or wh?ehbjL is applicable for the EGU and
the following records related to the emissions of mercury that the EGU is
allowed to emit :
A)
For an EGU for which the owner or operator is complying with this Subpart
by means of Section 225 .230(a)(2) or 225 .237 (a) (1) (B) or using input mercury
levels to determine the allowable emissions of the EGU, records of the daily
mercury content of coal used (lbs/trillion Btu) and the daily and monthly input
mercury (lbs), which shall be kept in the file required under 40 CFR 75 .84(a) .
B)
For an EGU for which the owner or operator of an EGU complying with this
Subpart by means of Section 225 .230 (a) (1) or 225 .237 (a) (1) (A) or using
electrical output to determine the allowable emissions of the EGU, records of
the daily and monthly gross electrical output (GWh), which shall be kept in the
file required under 40 CFR 75
.84(a) .
3)
The owner or operator of an EGU shall maintain records of the following
for each EGU :
A)
Monthly emissions of mercury from the EGU .
B)
For an EGU for which the owner or operator is complying by means of
Section 225 .230(b) or (d) of this Subpart, records of the monthly allowable
emissions of mercury from the EGU .
4)
The owner or operator of an EGU that is participating in an Averaging
Demonstration pursuant to Section 225 .232 of this Subpart shall maintain records
identifying all sources and EGUs covered by the Demonstration for each month
and, within 60 days efaltyL the end of each calendar month, calculate and record
the actual and allowable mercury emissions of the EGU for the month and the
applicable 12-month rolling period .
5) The owner or operator of an EGU shall maintain the following records
related to quality assurance activities conducted for emissions monitoring
systems :
A)
The results of quarterly assessments conducted under Section 2 .2 of
Appendix B of 40 CFR-Parb 75 ; and
B)
Daily/weekly system integrity checks under Section 2 .6 of Appendix B of 40
CFR-Pa*O 75 .
6)
The owner or operator of an EGU shall maintain an electronic copy of all
electronic submittals to the USEPA under 40 CFR 75 .84(f) .
7)
The owner or operator of an EGU shall retain all records required by this
Section at the source unless otherwise provided in the CAAPP permit issued for
the source and shall make a copy of any record available to the Agency upon
request .
b)
Quarterly epe s .
The owner or operator of a source with one or
more EGUs shall submit quarterly reports to the Agency as follows :
I
1)
These reports shall include the following information for operation of the
EGUs during the quarter :

 
A)
The total operating hours of each
EGU and the mercury CEMS, as also
reported in accordance with 40 CM-Pao, 75 .
B) A discussion of any significant changes in the measures used to control
emissions of mercury from the EGUs or the coal supply to the EGUs, including
changes in the source of coal .
C)
Summary information on the performance of the mercury CEMS
. When the
mercury CEMS was not inoperative, repaired, or adjusted, except for routine zero
and span checks, this shall be stated in the report .
EO
If the CEMS downtime was more than 5
.0 percent of the total operating time
for the EGU
: the date and time identifying each period during which the CEMS was
inoperative, except for routine zero and span checks ; the nature of CEMS repairs
or adjustments and a summary of quality assurance data consistent with 40 CFR-
P**O 75, i .e ., the dates and results of the Linearity Test(s) and any Relative
Accuracy Test Audit(s) during the quarter
; a listing of any days when a required
daily calibration was not performed ; and the date and duration of any periods
when the CEMS was out-of-control as addressed by Section 225 .260 of this
Subpart .
2)
The owner or operator shall submit each quarterly report to the Agency
within 45 days following the end of the calendar quarter covered by the report .
c)
Compliance eerQKeaK-onQq1tj1!watjgn . The owner or operator of a source
with one or more EGUs shall submit to the Agency a compliance certification in
support of each quarterly report based on reasonable inquiry of those persons
with primary responsibility for ensuring that all of the EGUs' emissions are
correctly and fully monitored . The certification shall state-that :
1)-m~
That the monitoring data submitted were recorded in accordance with the
applicable requirements of this Section, Sections 225 .240 through 22 S .2?0, and
Seetien 225 .299 of this--& bpa*4,225.21! and 40 CFR Part 75, including the
quality assurance procedures and specifications ; and
2)
For an EGU with add-on mercury emission controls, a flue gas
desulfurization system, a selective catalytic reduction system, or a compact
hybrid particulate collector system and for all hours where mercury data are
substituted in accordance with 40 CFR 75 .34(a)(1) :
IA)
--_-That
i)
The mercury add-on emission controls, flue gas desulfurization system,
selective catalytic reduction system, or compact hybrid particulate collector
system werejag operating within the range of parameters listed in the quality
assurance/quality control program under Appendix B to 40 CFR Par-t-75
; or
ii)
With regard to a flue gas desulfurization system or a selective catalytic
reduction system, quality-assured S02 emission data recorded in accordance with
40 CFR
Part--75
document that the flue gas desulfurization system was operating
properly, or quality-assured NOX emission data recorded in accordance with 40
CFR Part 75 document that the selective catalytic reduction system ; was
operating properly, as applicable ; and
B)
The substitute data values do not systematically underestimate mercury
emissions .

 
d)
Annual Certification of Compliance
1)
Subpart
Theshallownersubmitor
operatorto
the
ofAgency
a sourcean
Annual
with oneCertification
or more EGUsof
Compliance
subject to
withthis
this Subpart no later than May 1 of each year and shall address compliance for
the previous calendar year
. Such certification shall be submitted to the
Agency, Air Compliance and Enforcement Section, and the Air Regional Field
office .
2)
Annual Certifications of Compliance shall indicate whether compliance
existed for each EGU for each month in the year covered by the Certification and
certification to that effect
. In addition, for each EGU, the owner or operator
shall provide the following :
A)
If complying with this Subpart by means of Section 225 .230(a)(1)(A) or
225 .237 (a) (1) (A)
:
i)
Actual emissions rate, in lb/GWh, for each 12-month rolling period ending
in the year covered by the Certification
;
ii)
Actual emissions, in lbs, and gross electrical output, in GWh, for each
12-month rolling period ending in the year covered by the Certification
; and
iii) Actual emissions, in lbs, and gross electrical output, in GWh, for each
month in the year covered by the Certification and in the previous year
.
B)
If complying with this Subpart by means of Section 225 .230 (a) (1) (B) or
225 .237(a)(1)(B)
:
i)
Actual control efficiency for emissions for each 12-month rolling period
ending in the year covered by the Certification, expressed as a percent
;
ii)
Actual emissions, in lbs, and mercury content in the fuel fired in such
EGU, in lbs, for each 12-month rolling period ending in the year covered by the
Certification ; and
al emissions, in lbs, and mercury content in the fuel fired in such
or each month in the year covered by the Certification and in the
ious year .
If complying with this Subpart by means of Section 225
.230(b) :
i)
Actual emissions and allowable emissions for each 12-month rolling period
ending in the year covered by the Certification ; and
ii) Actual emissions and allowable emissions, and which standard of compliance
the owner or operator was utilizing for each month in the year covered by the
Certification and in the previous year
.
D)
If complying with this Subpart by means of Section 225
.230(d) :
i)
Actual emissions and allowable emissions for all EGUs at the source for
each 12-month rolling period ending in the year covered by the Certification
;
and

 
ii)the
ownerActualor
emissionsoperator
wasand utilizingallowable foremissions,each
month
and
in
whichthe
year
standardcovered
of complianceby
the
Certification and in the previous year .
E)
If complying with this Subpart by means of Section 225
.232 :
i)
Actual emissions and allowable emissions for all EGUs at the source in an
Averaging Demonstration for each 12-month rolling period ending in the year
covered by the Certification
; and
ii)
Actual emissions and allowable emissions, with the standard of compliance
the owner or operator was utilizing for each EGU at the source in an Averaging
Demonstration for each month for all EGUs at the source in an Averaging
Demonstration in the year covered by the Certification and in the previous year
.
F) Any deviations, data substitutions, or exceptions each month and
discussion of the reasons for such deviations, data substitutions, or
exceptions .
3)
All Annual Certifications of Compliance required to be submitted shall
include the following certification by a responsible official
:
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments w
prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed
to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information
submitted
. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible
for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete
. I am aware that there are
significant penalties for submitting false information, including the
possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations
.
operator is not required
Section 2 95
4) The owner or operato
Certification of Compliance to
in which the EGU commences comme
Notwithstanding subsection (d)
(2)
of Compliance that are required to be
00k~- Za ll to address calendar years
prow :
Deviat
promptly notify the Agency of deviations
a minimum, these notifications shall i
within 30 days
n1allar discovery o
possible cause of such deviation
measures cake
-Fewg
. For each EGU, the o
Treatment of Mercury Allowances
mit its first
calendar year 2009 or the calendar year
operation, whichever is
is Section, in the Annual Certifications
bmitted by may 1,
2545.2jif and May 1,
2010, respectively, the owner or
rolling data for any period that
er o
equirements o
description of
ations, and a discu
corrective actions, and an
. At
ons
e
a
gAnna RATA The
owner or operator of
Compliance and Enforcement Section, the
or group of EGUs monitored at a
Agency,
t for eac
non-EGU under 40 CFR 75
.82(b)(2)(ii) within 45 days after
quality assurance RATA
.

 
Any mercury allowances allocated to the Agency by the USEPA shall be treated as
follows :
a)
No such allowances shall be allocated to any owner or operator of an EGU
or other sources of mercury emissions into the atmosphere or discharges into the
waters of the State .
b) The Agency shall hold all allowances allocated by the USEPA to the State
.
At the end of each calendar year, the Agency shall instruct the USEPA to retire
permanently all such allowances .
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
NOTICE OF PROPOSED PULE

 
Document
comparison
done by
DeRaVlew
on
Friday, March
24, 2006
9 :29 :07 AM
Legen
bacmall
Deleted cell
Paddina cell
0
Format change
nserted cell
Split/Mei
Statistics :
ed cel
Insertions
Deletions
IMoved from
Moved to
Style change
Format changed
Total changes
Count
89
109
198
Input:
Document 1
file ://I :/Input/35-225-Agency(issuel3) .doc
Document 2
file ://I :/Input/35-225-rOl (issue 13) .doc
Rendering set Standard

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
1
TITLE 35 : ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
2
SUBTITLE B : AIR POLLUTION
3
CHAPTER I : POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
4
SUBCHAPTER c : EMISSION STANDARDS AND LIMITATIONS
5
FOR STATIONARY SOURCES
6
7
PART 225
8
CONTROL OF EMISSIONS FROM LARGE COMBUSTION SOURCES
9
10
SUBPART A : GENERAL PROVISIONS
11
12
Section
13
225 .100
Severability
14 225 .120
Abbreviations and Acronyms
15
225 .130
Definitions
16 225 .140
Incorporations by Reference
17
18
SUBPART B : CONTROL OF MERCURY EMISSIONS
19
FROM COAL-FIRED ELECTRIC GENERATING UNITS
20
21
Section
22 225 .200
Purpose
23 225 .202
Measurement Methods
24 225 .205
Applicability
25
225 .210
Compliance Requirements
26
225 .220
Clean Air Act Permit Program (CAAPP) Permit Requirements
27 225 .230
Emission Standards for EGUs at Existing Sources
28 225 .232
Averaging Demonstrations for Existing Sources
29 225 .235
Units Scheduled for Permanent Shut Down
30 225 .237
Emission Standards for New Sources with EGUs
31 225 .240
General Monitoring and Reporting Requirements
32 225 .250
Initial Certification and Recertification Procedures for Emissions Monitoring
33 225 .260
Out of Control Periods for Emission Monitors
34 225 .261
Additional Requirements to Provide Heat Input Data
35 225 .263
Monitoring of Gross Electrical Output
36 225 .265
Coal Analysis for Input Mercury Levels
37 225 .270
Notifications
38 225 .290
Recordkeeping and Reporting
39 225 .295
Treatment of Mercury Allowances
40
41 AUTHORITY
: Implementing Section 9.10 and authorized by Sections 27 and 28 .5 of the
42 Environmental Protection Act [415 ILCS 5/9
.10, 27 and 28 .5] .
43

 
Environmental Protection Act [415 ILCS 5]
British thermal unit
Clean Air Act [42 USC 7401 et seq.]
Clean Air Act Permit Program
carbon dioxide
electric generating unit
gigawatt hour
hour
pound
megawatt
megawatt electrical
megawatt hour
nitrogen oxides
oxygen
JCAR350225-0605957r01
4544
SOURCE
: Adopted at 30 Ill. Reg . , effective
46
SUBPART A: GENERAL PROVISIONS
47
48
Section 225.100 Severability
49
50
If any Section, subsection or clause of this Part is found invalid, such finding shall not affect the
51
validity of this Part as a whole or any Section, subsection or clause not found invalid .
52
53 Section 225.120 Abbreviations and Acronyms
54
55
Unless otherwise specified within this Part, the abbreviations used in this Part shall be the same
56
as those found in 35 Ill. Adm. Code 211 . The following abbreviations and acronyms are used in
57
this Part :
58
59 Act
60 Btu
61 CAA
62 CAAPP
63 CO2
64 EGU
65
GWh
66
hr
67 lb
68 MW
69 MWe
70 MWh
71 NO,
72
02
73
RATA
e ' e accuracy test audit
74 SO2
sulfur dioxide
75 USEPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
76
77 Section 225.130 Definitions
78
79
The definitions contained in this Section apply only to the provisions of this Part . Unless
80 otherwise defined in this Section and unless a different meaning of a term is clear from its
81
context, the definitions of terms used in this Part shall have the meanings specified for those
82
e
in 35 Ill . Adm . Code 211 .
83
84
"Averaging demonstration" means, with regard to Subpart B of this Part, a
85
demonstration of compliance that is based on the combined performance of EGUs
86
at two or more sources.

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
"Boiler" means an enclosed fossil or other fuel-fired combustion device used to
produce heat and to transfer heat to recirculating water, steam, or other medium .
"Bottoming-cycle cogeneration unit" means a cogeneration unit in which the
energy input to the unit is first used to produce useful thermal energy and at least
some of the reject heat from the useful thermal energy application or process is
then used for electricity production .
"Coal" means any solid fuel classified as anthracite, bituminous, subbituminous,
or lignite by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard
Specification for Classification of Coals by Rank D388-77, 90, 91, 95, 98a, or 99
(Reapproved 2004) .
"Coal-derived fuel" means any fuel (whether in a solid, liquid or gaseous state)
produced by the mechanical, thermal, or chemical process .
"Coal-fired" means combusting any amount of coal or coal-derived fuel, alone or
in combination with any amount of any other fuel, during a specified year
.
"Cogeneration unit" means a stationary, fossil fuel-fired- oiler or stationary, fossil
fuel-fired combustion turbine :
Having equipment used to produce electricity and useful thermal energy
for industrial, commercial, heating, or cooling purposes through the
sequential use of energy ; and
Producing during the 12-month period starting on the date the unit first
produces electricity and during any calendar year after the calendar year in
which the unit first produces electricity :
For a topping-cycle cogeneration unit :
Useful thermal energy not less than 5 percent of total
energy output ; and
Useful power that, when added to one-half of useful
thermal energy produced, is not less than 42 .5 percent of
total energy input, if useful thermal energy produced is 15
percent or more of total energy output, or not less than 45
percent of total energy input, if useful thermal energy
produced is less than 15 percent of total energy output .

 
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
JCAR350225-0605957r01
For a bottoming-cycle cogeneration unit, useful power not less
than 45 percent of total energy input
.
"Combustion turbine" means :
An enclosed device comprising a compressor, a combustor, and a turbine
and in which the flue gas resulting from the combustion of fuel in the
combustor passes through the turbine, rotating the turbine
; and
If the enclosed device under the above paragraph of this definition is
combined cycle, any associated heat recovery steam generator and steam
turbine .
"Commence commercial operation" means, with regard to Subpart B of this Part,
with regard to an Electric Generating Unit that serves a generator, to have begun
to produce steam, gas, or other heated medium used to generate electricity for sale
or use, including test generation . Such date shall remain the unit's date of
commencement of operation even if the Electric Generating Unit is subsequently
modified, reconstructed or repowered
.
"Designated representative" means, with regard to Subpart B of this Part, the
same as defined in 40 CFR 60 .4102 .
"Flue" means a conduit or duct through which gases or other matter is exhausted
to the atmosphere .
"Gross electrical output" means the total electrical output from an Electric
Generating Unit before making any deductions for energy output used in any way
related to the production of energy
. For an Electric Generating Unit generating
only electricity, the gross electrical output is the output from the turbine/generator
set.
"Input mercury" means the mass of mercury that is contained in the coal
combusted within an Electric Generating Unit .
"Nameplate capacity" means, starting from the initial installation of a generator,
the maximum electrical generating output (in MWe) that the generator is capable
of producing on a steady-state basis and during continuous operation (when not
restricted by seasonal or other deratings) as specified by the manufacturer of the
generator or, starting from the completion of any subsequent physical change in
the generator resulting in an increase in the maximum electrical generating output
(in MWe) that the generator is capable of producing on a steady-state basis and
during continuous operation (when not restricted by seasonal or other deratings),

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
173
such increased maximum amount as specified by the person conducting the
174
physical change .
175
176
"Output-based emission standard" means, with regard to Subpart B of this Part, a
177
maximum allowable rate of emissions of mercury per unit of gross electrical
178
output from an Electric Generating Unit .
179
180
"Repowered" means, with regard to an EGU, replacement of a coal-fired boiler
181
with one of the following coal-fired technologies at the same source as the coal-
182
fired boiler:
183
184
Atmospheric or pressurized fluidized bed combustion ;
185
186
Integrated gasification combined cycle ;
187
188
Magnetohydrodynamics ;
189
190
Direct and indirect coal-fired turbines ;
191
192
Integrated gasification fuel cells ; or
193
194
As determined by the US EPA in consultation with the United States Department
195
of Energy, a derivative of one or more of the technologies under this definition
196
and any other coal-fired technology capable of controlling multiple combustion
197
emissions simultaneously with improved boiler or generation efficiency and with
198
significantly greater waste reduction relative to the performance of technology in
199
widespread commercial use as of January 1, 2005 .
200
201
"Rolling 12-month basis" means, with regard to Subpart B of this Part, a
202
determination made on a monthly basis from the relevant data for a particular
203
calendar month and the preceding 11 calendar months (total of 12 months of
204
data), with two exceptions . For determinations involving one EGU, calendar
205
months in which the EGU does not operate (zero EGU operating hours) shall not
206
be included in the determination, and shall be replaced by a preceding month or
207
months in which the EGU does operate, so that the determination is still based on
208
12 months of data . For determinations involving two or more EGUs, calendar
209
months in which none of the EGUs covered by the determination operates (zero
210
EGU operating hours) shall not be included in the deteiiiiination, and shall be
211
replaced by preceding months in which at least one of the EGU covered by the
212
determination does operate, so that the determination is still based on 12 months
213
of data .
214
215 Section 225.140 Incorporations by Reference

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
216
217
The following materials are incorporated by reference
. These incorporations do not include any
218
later amendments or editions .
219
220
a)
40 CFR 60, § 60.17,
§ 60.45a, § 60.49a(k)(1), § 60.49a(p), § 60.50a(h), and §§
221
60.4170
through 60 .4176 (2005) .
222
223
b)
40 CFR 75 (2005) .
224
225
c)
ASTM . American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P
.O.
226
Box C700, West Conshohocken PA 19428-2959, (610) 832-9585 :
227
228
1)
ASTM D388-77, 90,
91, 95, 98a, or 99, Classification of Coals by Rank
229
(Reapproved 2004) .
230
231
ASTM D3173-03, Standard Test Method for Moisture in the Analysis
232
Sample of Coal and Coke (Approved April 10, 2003) .
233
234
3)
ASTM D3684-01, Standard Test Method for Total Mercury in Coal by the
235
Oxygen Bomb Combustion/Atomic Absorption Method (Approved
236
October 10, 2001) .
237
238
ASTM D5865-04, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of
239
Coal and Coke (Approved April 1, 2004) .
240
241
5)
ASTM D6414-01, Standard Test Method for Total Mercury in Coal and
242
Coal Combustion Residues by Acid Extraction or Wet Oxidation/Cold
243
Vapor Atomic Absorption (Approved October 10, 2001) .
244
245
6)
ASTM D6784-02, Standard Test Method for Elemental, Oxidized,
246
Particle-Bound and Total Mercury in Flue Gas Generated from Coal-Fired
247
Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro Method) (Approved April 10, 2002) .
248
249
SUBPART B : CONTROL OF MERCURY EMISSIONS
250
FROM COAL-FIRED ELECTRIC GENERATING UNITS
251
252 Section 225
.200 Purpose
253
254 The purpose of this Subpart is to control the emissions of mercury from coal-fired electrical
255
generating units in Illinois .
256
257 Section 225 .202 Measurement Methods
258

 
JCAR350225-0605957r0I
259 Measurement of mercury shall be according to the following :
260
261
a)
Conti uous emission monitoring pursuant to 40 CFR 75 (2005) .
262
263
b)
ASTM D3173-03, Standard Test Method for Moisture in the Analysis Sample of
264
Coal and Coke (Approved April 10, 2003) .
265
266
c)
ASTM D3684-01, Standard Test Method for Total Mercury in Coal by the
267
Oxygen Bomb Combustion/Atomic Absorption Method (Approved October 10,
268
2001) .
269
270
d)
ASTM D5865-04, Standard Test Method for Gross Calorific Value of Coal and
271
Coke (Approved April 1, 2004) .
272
273
e)
ASTM D6414-01, Standard Test Method for Total Mercury in Coal and Coal
274
Combustion Residues by Acid Extraction or Wet Oxidation/Cold Vapor Atomic
275
Absorption (Approved October 10, 2001) .
276
277
f)
ASTM D6784-02, Standard Test Method for Elemental, Oxidized, Particle-Bound
278
and Total Mercury in Flue Gas Generated from Coal-Fired Stationary Sources
279
(Ontario Hydro Method) (Approved April 10, 2002).
280
281
Section 225.205 Applicability
282
283 The following stationary coal-fired boilers and stationary coal-fired combustion turbines are
284 EGUs and are subject to this Subpart :
285
286
287
288
289
290
b)
For a unit that qualifies as a cogeneration unit during the 12-month period starting
291
on the date the unit first produces electricity and continues to qualify as a
292
cogeneration unit, a cogeneration unit serving at any time a generator with
293
nameplate capacity of more than 25 MWe and supplying in any calendar year
294
more than one-third of the unit's potential electric output capacity or 219,000
295
MWh, whichever is greater, to any utility power distribution system for sale . If a
296
unit qualifies as a cogeneration unit during the 12-month period starting on the
297
date the unit first produces electricity but subsequently no longer qualifies as a
298
cogeneration unit, the unit shall be subject to subsection (a) of this Section
299
starting on the day on which the unit first no longer qualifies as a cogeneration
300
unit.
301
a)
Except as provided in subsection (b) of this Section, a unit serving, at any time
since the start-up of the unit's combustion chamber, a generator with nameplate
capacity of more than 25 MWe producing electricity for sale .

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
302
Section 225.210 Compliance Requirements
303
304
a)
Permit Requirements
305
The owner or operator of each source with one or more EGUs subject to this
306
Subpart at the source must apply for a CAAPP permit that addresses the
307
applicable requirements of this Subpart .
308
309
b)
Monitoring Requirements
310
311
1)
The owner or operator of each source and each EGU at the source must
312
comply with the monitoring requirements of Sections 225 .240 through
313
225.290 of this Subpart .
314
315
2)
The compliance of each EGU with the mercury requirements under
316
Sections 225 .230 and 225 .237 of this Subpart shall be determined by the
317
emissions measurements recorded and reported in accordance with
318
Sections 225 .240 through 225 .290 of this Subpart .
319
320
c)
Mercury Emission Reduction Requirements
321
The owner or operator of any EGU subject to this Subpart shall comply with
322
applicable requirements for control of mercury emissions under Section 225 .230
323
or Section 225 .237 of this Subpart .
324
325
Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements
326
Unless otherwise provided, the owner or operator of a source with one or more
327
EGUs at the source shall keep on site at the source each of the documents listed in
328
subsections (d)(1) through
(d)(3) of this Section for a period of five years from the
329
date the document is created
. This period may be extended for cause, at any time
330
prior to the end of five years, in writing by the Agency
.
331
332
1)
All emissions monitoring information, in accordance with Sections
333
225 .240 through 225 .290 of this Subpart .
334
335
2)
Copies of all reports, compliance certifications, and other submissions and
336
all records made or required or documents necessary to demonstrate
337
compliance with the requirements of this Subpart
.
338
339
3)
Copies of all documents used to complete a permit application and any
340
other submission under this Subpart .
341
342
e)
Liability
343

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
1)
The owner or operator of each source with one or more EGUs shall meet
the requirements of this Subpart .
2)
Any provision of this Subpart that applies to a source shall also apply to
the owner and operator of such source and to the owner and operator of
each EGU at the source .
3)
Any provision of this Subpart that applies to an EGU shall also apply to
the owner and operator of such EGU.
Effect on Other Authorities . No provision of this Subpart shall be construed as
exempting or excluding the owner and operator of a source or EGU from
compliance with any other provision of an approved State Implementation Plan, a
permit, the Act, or the CAA
.
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
f)
355
356
357
358
359 Section 225.220
360
361
a)
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
b)
Contents of Permit Applications
383
In addition to other information required for a complete application for CAAPP
384
permit or CAAPP
permit
modification, the application shall include the following
385
information :
386
Clean Air Act Permit Program
Application Requirements
1)
Each source with one or more EGUs subject to the requirements of this
Subpart is required to submit a CAAPP permit application that addresses
all applicable requirements of this Subpart, applicable to each EGU at the
source .
2)
For any EGU that commenced commercial operation :
A)
on or before December 31, 2008, the owner or operator of that
EGU must submit an initial permit application or application for
CAAPP permit modification that meets the requirements of this
Section by December 31, 2008 .
B) after December 31, 2008, the owner or operator of any such EGU
must submit an initial CAAPP permit application or application for
CAAPP modification that meets the requirements of this Section
not later than 180 days before initial startup of the EGU, unless the
construction permit issued for the EGU addresses the requirements
of this Subpart.
(CAAPP) Permit Requirements

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
387
1)
The ORIS (Office of Regulatory Information Systems) or facility code
388
assigned to the source by the Energy Infoiniation Administration, if
389
applicable.
390
391
2)
Identification of each EGU at the source
.
392
393
3)
The intended approach to the monitoring requirements of Sections
394
225 .240 through 225 .290 of this Subpart .
395
396
4)
The intended approach to the mercury emission reduction requirements of
397
Section 225 .230 or 225 .237 of this Subpart, as applicable
.
398
399
c)
Permit Contents
400
401
1)
Each CAAPP permit issued by the Agency for a source with one or more
402
EGUs subject to the requirements of this Subpart shall contain federally
403
enforceable conditions addressing all applicable requirements of this
404
Subpart, which conditions shall be a complete and segregable portion of
405
the source's entire CAAPP peinnit .
406
407
2)
In addition to conditions related to the applicable requirements of this
408
Subpart, each such CAAPP permit shall also contain the information
409
specified under subsection (b) of this Section .
410
411 Section 225 .230 Emission Standards for EGUs at Existing Sources
412
413
a)
Emission Standards
414
415
1)
Beginning July 1, 2009, the owner or operator of a source with one
416
or more EGUs subject to this Subpart that commenced commercial
417
operation on or before December 31, 2008 shall comply with one of the
418
following standards for each EGU on a rolling 12-month basis :
419
420
A)
An emission standard of 0 .0080 lb mercury/GWh gross electrical
421
output; or
422
423
B)
A minimum 90-percent reduction of input mercury .
424
425
2)
For an EGU complying with subsection (a)(1)(A)
of this Section, the
426
actual mercury emission rate of the EGU for each 12-month rolling period,
427
as monitored in accordance with this Subpart and calculated as follows,
428
shall not exceed the applicable emission standard :
429

 
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
Where:
ER
Actual mercury emissions rate of the EGU for the particular 12-
month rolling period, expressed in lb/GWh .
E, - Actual mercury emissions of the EGU, in lbs, in an individual
month in the 12-month rolling period, as detennined in
accordance with the emissions monitoring provisions of this
Subpart.
O; =
Gross electrical output of the EGU, in GWh, in an individual
month in the 12-month rolling period, as determined in
accordance with Section 225 .263 of this Subpart
.
3)
For an EGU complying with subsection
(a)(1)(B) of this Section, the
actual control efficiency for mercury emissions achieved by the EGU for
each 12-month rolling period, as monitored in accordance with this
Subpart and calculated as follows, shall meet or exceed the applicable
efficiency requirement :
1
1'
450
CE =
100x
{1-
)}
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464 b) Alternative Emission Standards for Single EGUs
465
466
467
468
469
470
Where:
CE
E,
I
ER
JCAR350225-0605957r01
Actual control efficiency for mercury emissions of the EGU for
the particular 12-month rolling period, expressed as a percent
.
Actual mercury emissions of the EGU, in lbs, in an individual
month in the 12-month rolling period, as deteiinined in
accordance with the emissions monitoring provisions of this
Subpart.
Amount of mercury in the fuel fired in the EGU, in pounds, in an
individual month in the 12-month rolling period, as determined
in accordance with Section 225 .265 of this Subpart
.
1)
As an alternative to compliance with one of the above emission standards
in subsection (a) of this Section, the owner or operator of the EGU may
comply with the emission standards of this Subpart by demonstrating that
the actual emissions of mercury from the EGU are less than the allowable
emissions of mercury from the EGU on a rolling 12-month basis .

 
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500501
502
3)
503
504
505
506
507
Where:
E12
A12
IQ
It
Abvw
I
Aonw
j
E12
412
12
E12
E E,
i=1
JCAR350225-0605957r01
471
472
2)
For this purpose, for each rolling 12-month period, the actual emissions of
473
mercury from the EGU, as monitored in accordance with this Subpart,
474
must not exceed the allowable emissions of mercury from the EGU, as
475
further provided by the following formulas :
476
Actual mercury emissions of the EGU for the particular 12-
month rolling period .
Allowable mercury emissions of the EGU for the particular
12-month rolling period
Actual mercury emissions of the EGU in an individual month
in the 12-month rolling period .
Allowable mercury emissions of the EGU in an individual
month in the 12-month rolling period, based on either the
input mercury to the unit (Aj p,,, j) or the electrical output from
the EGU (Ao~ow ), as selected by the owner or operator of the
EGU for that given month .
Allowable mercury emissions of the EGU in an individual
month based on the input mercury to the EGU, calculated as
10 .0 percent (or 0.100) of the input mercury to the EGU
.
Allowable mercury emissions of the EGU in a particular
month based on the electrical output from the EGU,
calculated as the product of the output based mercury limit,
i .e., 0.0080 lb/GWh, and the electrical output from the EGU,
in GWh .
If the owner or operator of an JEW does not conduct the necessary
sampling, analysis, and recordkeeping, in accordance with Section
225 .265 of this Subpart, to determine the mercury input to the EGU, the
allowable emissions of the EGU must be calculated based on the electrical
output of the EGU .

 
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
Where:
Es
As
E,
A,
n =
n
As =
A,
i=1
Sum of the actual mercury emiss ons of the EGUs at the source .
Sum of the allowable mercury emissions of the EGUs at the
source.
Actual mercury emissions of an individual EGU at the source, as
determined in accordance with subsection (b)(2) of this Section .
Allowable mercury emissions of an individual EGU at the
source, as determined in accordance with subsection (b)(2) of
this Section.
Number of EGUs covered by the demonstratio .
JCAR350225-0605957r01
508
c)
If two or more EGUs are served by common stack(s) and the owner or operator
509
conducts monitoring for mercury emissions in the common stack(s), as provided
510
for by 40 CFR 75, Subpart I, such that the mercury emissions of each EGU are
511
not determined separately, compliance of the EGUs with the applicable emission
512
standards of this Subpart shall be determined as if the EGUs were a single EGU .
513
514
d)
Alternative Emission Standards for Multiple EGUs
515
516
1)
As an alternative to compliance with the emission standards of subsection
517
(a) of this Section, the owner or operator of a source with an EGU may
518
comply with the emission standards of this Subpart by demonstrating that
519
the actual emissions of mercury from all EGUs at the source are less than
520
the allowable emissions of mercury from all EGUs at the source on a
521
rolling 12-month basis .
522
523
2)
For this purpose, for each rolling 12-month period, the actual emissions of
524
mercury from all the EGUs at the source, as monitored in accordance with
525
this Subpart, must not exceed the sum of the allowable emissions of
526
mercury from all the EGUs at the source, as further provided by the
527
following formulas
:
528
Es <_ As
529
n
Es =
E,
i=l

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
544
3)
If an owner or operator of a source with two or more EGUs that is relying
545
on this subsection (d) to demonstrate compliance fails to meet the
546
requirements of this subsection (d) in a given 12-month rolling period, all
547
EGUs at such source covered by the compliance demonstration are
548
considered out of compliance with the applicable emission standards of
549
this Subpart for the entire last month of that period .
550
551
Section 225 .232 Averaging Demonstrations for Existing Sources
552
553
a)
Through December 31, 2013, as an alternative to compliance with the emission
554
standards of Section 225 .230(a) of this Subpart, the owner or operator of an EGU
555
may comply with the emission standards of this Subpart by means of an
556
Averaging Demonstration (Demonstration) that shows that the actual emissions of
557
mercury from the EGU and other EGUs at the source and other EGUs at other
558
sources covered by the Demonstration are less than the allowable emissions of
559
mercury from all EGUs covered by the Demonstration on a rolling 12-month
560
basis.
561
562
b)
The EGUs at each source covered by a Demonstration must also comply with one
563
of the following emission standards on a source-wide basis for the period covered
564
by the Demonstration :
565
566
1)
An emission standard of 0 .020 lb mercury/GWh gross electrical output
; or
567
568
2)
A minimum 75 percent reduction of input mercury .
569
570
c)
For the purpose of this Section, compliance shall be determined using the
571
equations in Section 225 .230(a)(2), (a)(3), or (d)(2) of this Subpart, as applicable,
572
addressing all EGUs at the sources covered by the Demonstration, rather than
573
only EGUs at one source .
574
575
d)
Limitations on Demonstrations
576
577
1)
The owners or operators of more than one existing source with EGUs can
578
only participate in Demonstrations that include other existing sources that
579
they own or operate .
580
581
2)
Single Existing Source Demonstrations
582
583
A)
The owner or operator of only a single existing source with EGUs
584
(i.e., City, Water, Light & Power, City of Springfield,
ID
585
167120AAO; Electric Energy, Inc
., ID 127855AAC ; Kincaid
586
Generating Station, ID 021814AAB; and Southern Illinois Power

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
587
Cooperative/Marion Generating Station, ID 199856AAC) can only
588
participate in Demonstrations with other such owners or operators
589
of a single existing source of EGUs .
590
591
B)
Participation in Demonstrations under this Section by the owner or
592
operator of only a single existing source with EGUs must be
593
authorized through federally enforceable permit conditions for
594
each such source participating in the Demonstration .
595
596
A source may be included in only one Demonstration during each rolling 12-
597
month period.
598
599
f)
The owner or operator of EGUs using Demonstrations to show compliance with
600
this Subpart must complete the detenuiination of compliance for each 12-month
601
rolling period no later than 60 days following the end of the period .
602
603
g)
If averaging is used to demonstrate compliance with this Subpart, the effect of a
604
failure to demonstrate compliance shall be that the compliance status of each
605
source shall be determined under Section 225
.230 of this Subpart as if the sources
606
were not covered by a Demonstration .
607
608
For purposes of this Section, if the owner or operator of any source that
609
participates in a Demonstration with an owner or operator of a source that does
610
not maintain the required records, data, and reports for the EGUs at the source, or
611
does not submit copies of such records, data, or reports to the Agency upon
612
request, then the effect of this failure will be deemed to be a failure to
613
demonstrate compliance and the compliance status of each source shall be
614
determined under Section 225 .230 of this Subpart as if the sources were not
615
covered by a Demonstration .
616
617
Section 225.235 Units Scheduled for Permanent Shut Down
618
619
a)
The emission standards of Section 225 .230(a) of this Subpart are not applicable to
620
an EGU that will be permanently shut down as follows :
621
622
1)
The owner or operator of an EGU for which this Section is being relied
623
upon shall by no later than June 30, 2009
:
624
625
A)
Have notified the Illinois EPA that it is planning to permanently
626
shut down the EGU by the applicable date specified in subsection
627
(a)(3)
or (4) of this Section . This notification shall be
628
accompanied by a description of the actions that have already been
629
taken to allow the shut down of the EGU and a description of the

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
630
future actions that must be accomplished to complete the shut
631
down of the EGU, with the anticipated schedule for those actions
632
and the anticipated date of permanent shut down of the unit
.
633
634
B)
Have applied for a construction permit or be actively pursuing a
635
federally enforceable agreement that requires the EGU to be
636
permanently shut down in accordance with this Section .
637
638
C)
Have applied for revisions to the operating permit(s) for the EGU
639
to include provisions that terminate the authorization to operate the
640
unit in accordance with this Section .
641
642
2)
The owner or operator of an EGU for which this Section is being relied
643
upon shall by no later than June 30, 2010 :
644
645
A)
Have obtained a construction permit or entered into a federally
646
enforceable agreement as addressed by subsection
(a)(1)(B) of this
647
Section; or
648
649
B)
Have obtained revised operating permit(s) in accordance with
650
subsection (a)(1)(C)
of this Section .
651
652
3)
The plan for peiiuanent shut down of the EGU must provide for the EGU
653
to be permanently shut down by no later than the applicable date specified
654
below
:
655
656
A)
If the owner or operator of the EGU is not constructing a new EGU
657
or other generating units to specifically replace the existing EGU,
658
by December 31, 2010 .
659
660
If the owner or operator of the EGU is constructing a new EGU or
661
other generating units to specifically replace the existing EGU, by
662
December 31, 2011 .
663
664
4)
The owner or operator of the EGU must permanently shut down the EGU
665
by the date specified in subsection (a)(3)
of this Section, unless the owner
666
or operator submits a demonstration to the Illinois EPA before such date
667
showing that circumstances beyond its reasonable control (such as
668
protracted delays in construction activity, unanticipated outage of another
669
EGU, or protracted shakedown of a replacement unit) have occurred that
670
interfere with the plan for permanent shut down of the EGU, in which case
671
the date for shut down of the EGU may be extended as follows :
672

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
673
A)
If the owner or operator of the EGU is not constructing a new EGU
674
or other generating units to specifically replace the existing EGU,
675
for up to one year, i
.e., permanent shut down of the EGU to occur
676
by no later than December 31, 2011 .
677
678
B)
If the owner or operator of the EGU is constructing a new EGU or
679
other generating units to specifically replace the existing EGU, for
680
up to 18 months, i.e.,
permanent shutdown of the EGU to occur by
681
no later than June 30, 2013
; provided, however, that after
682
December 31, 2012, the existing EGU shall only operate as a back-
683
up unit to address periods when the new generating units are not in
684
service .
685
686
Notwithstanding Sections 225.230 and 225
.232 of this Subpart, any EGU that is
687
not required to comply with Section 225
.230 of this Subpart pursuant to this
688
Section shall not be included when determining whether any other EGUs at the
689
source or other sources are in compliance with Section 225.230
of this Subpart .
690
691
If an EGU, for which the owner or operator of the source has relied upon this
692
Section in lieu of complying with Section 225 .230(a) of this Subpart, is not
693
permanently shut down as required by this Section, the EGU shall be considered
694
to be a new EGU subject to the emission standards in Section 225
.237(a) of this
695
Subpart beginning in the month after the EGU was required to be permanently
696
shut down, in addition to any other penalties that may be imposed for failure to
697
permanently shut down the EGU in accordance with this Section
.
698
699
Section 225.237 Emission Standards for New
Sources with EGUs
700
701
a)
Standards
702
703
1)
The owner or operator of a source with one or more EGUs, but that
704
previously had not had any EGUs that commenced commercial operation
705
before January 1, 2009, shall comply with one of the following emission
706
standards for each EGU on a rolling 12-month basis :
707
708
A)
An emission standard of 0 .0080 lb mercury/GWh gross electrical
709
output; or
710
711
B)
A minimum 90 percent reduction of input mercury
.
712
713
2)
For this purpose, compliance may be demonstrated using the equations in
714
Section 225 .230(a)(2), (a)(3), or (b)(2) of this Subpart.
715

 
Install all monitoring systems required under this Section and Sections
225
.250 through 225 .290 of this Subpart for monitoring mercury mass
emissions (including all systems required to monitor mercury
concentration, stack gas moisture content, stack gas
flow rate, and CO2 or
O
oncentration, as applicable, in accordance with 40 CFR 75
.81 and
75 .82).
JCAR350225-0605957r01
716
b)
The initial 12-month rolling period for which compliance with the emission
717
standards of subsection (a)(1)
of this Section must be demonstrated for a new
718
EGU shall commence on the date that the initial performance test for the mercury
719
emission standard under 40 CFR 60
.45a also commences . The continuous
720
emission monitoring systems required by this Subpart for mercury emissions from
721
the EGU must be certified prior to this date
. Thereafter, compliance shall be
722
demonstrated on a rollingl2-month basis in terms of calendar months .
723
724 Section
225.240
General Monitoring and Reporting Requirements
725
726
The owner or operator of an EGU shall comply with the monitoring, recordkeeping, and
727
reporting requirements as provided in this Section, Sections 225.250
through 225 .290 of this
728
Subpart, and Subpart I of 40 CFR 75
. If the EGU utilizes a common stack with units that are not
729 EGUs and the owner or operator of the EGU does not conduct emissions monitoring in the duct
730 to the common stack from each EGU, the owner or operator of the EGU shall conduct emissions
731
oring in accordance with 40 CFR 75
.82(b)(2) and this Section, including monitoring in the
732
duct to the common stack from each unit that is not an EGU, unless the owner or operator of the
733
EGU counts the combined emissions measured at the common stack as the mass emissions of
734
mercury for the EGUs for recordkeeping and compliance purposes .
735
736
a)
Requirements for installation, certification, and data accounting
. The owner or
737
operator of each EGU shall:
738
739
1)
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
2)
Successfu ly complete all e
cation tests required under Section
747
225
.250 and meet all other requirements of this Section, Sections 225 .250
748
through 225 .290 of this Subpart, and Subpart I of 40 CFR 75 applicable to
749
. ring systems required under subsection (a)(1)
of this Section.
750
751
3)
752
753
754
4)
If the owner or operator elects to use the low mass emissions excepted
755
monitoring methodology for an EGU that emits no more than 464 ounces
756
(29 pounds) of mercury per year pursuant to 40 CFR 75 .81(b), also
757
perform emissions testing in accordance with 40 CFR 75 .81(c) to
758
demonstrate that the EGU is eligible to use this excepted emissions
Record, report, and quality-assure the data from the monitoring systems
required under subsection
(a)(1) of this Section .

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
759
monitoring methodology, as well as comply with all other applicable
760
requirements of 40 CFR 75 .81(b) through (f), and submit a copy of any
761
information required to be submitted to the USEPA under these provisions
762
to the Illinois EPA. The initial emissions testing to demonstrate eligibility
763
of an EGU for the low mass emissions excepted methodology shall be
764
conducted by the following dates :
765
766
A)
If the EGU has commenced commercial operation before July 1,
767
2008, at least by January 1, 2009, or 45 days prior to relying on the
768
low mass emissions excepted methodology, whichever date is
769
later.
770
771
B)
If the EGU has commenced commercial operation on or after July
772
1, 2008, at least 45 days prior to the applicable date specified under
773
subsection (b)(2)
of this Section or 45 days prior to relying on the
774
low mass emissions excepted methodology, whichever date is
775
later
.
776
777
b)
Emissions Monitoring Deadlines. The owner or operator shall meet the emissions
778
monitoring system certification and other emissions monitoring requirements of
779
subsections (a)(1) and (a)(2)
of this Section on or before the following dates . The
780
owner or operator shall record, report, and quality-assure the data from the
781
emissions monitoring systems required under subsection
(a)(1) of this Section on
782
and after the following dates :
783
784
1)
For the owner or operator of an EGU that commences commercial
785
operation before July 1, 2008, by January 1, 2009 .
786
787
2)
For the owner or operator of an EGU that commences commercial
788
operation on or after July 1, 2008, by 90 unit operating days or 180
789
calendar days, whichever occurs first, after the date on which the EGU
790
commences commercial operation
.
791
792
3)
For the owner or operator of an EGU for which construction of a new
793
stack or flue or installation of add-on mercury emission controls, a flue
794
gas desulfurization system, a selective catalytic reduction system, a fabric
795
filter, or a compact hybrid particulate collector system is completed after
796
the applicable deadline under subsection (b)(1)
or (2) of this Section, by
797
90 unit operating days or 180 calendar days, whichever occurs first, after
798
the date on which emissions first exit to the atmosphere through the new
799
stack or flue, add-on mercury emissions controls, flue gas desulfurization
800
system, selective catalytic reduction system, fabric filter, or compact
801
hybrid particulate collector system .

 
802
803
c)
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
d)
Prohibitions
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
2)
837
838
839
840
841
842
3)
843
844
Reporting Data
1)
2)
1)
JCAR350225-0605957r0I
Except as provided in subsection
(c)(2) of this Section, the owner or
operator of an EGU that does not meet the applicable emissions
monitoring date set forth in subsection (b) of this Section for any
emissions monitoring system required under subsection (a)(1)
of this
Section shall, for each such monitoring system, determine, record, and
report maximum potential (or, as appropriate, minimum potential) values
for mercury concentration, stack gas flow rate, stack gas moisture content,
and any other parameters required to determine mercury mass emissions in
accordance with 40 CFR 75 .80(g).
The owner or operator of an EGU that does not meet the applicable
emissions monitoring date set forth in subsection
(b)(3) of this Section for
any emissions monitoring system required under subsection (a)(1) of this
Section shall, for each such monitoring system, determine, record, and
report substitute data using the applicable missing data procedures in 40
CFR 75.80(f), in lieu of the maximum potential (or, as appropriate,
minimum potential) values for a parameter, if the owner or operator
demonstrates that there is continuity between the,data streams for that
parameter before and after the construction or installation under
subsection (b)(3)
of this Section .
No owner or operator of an EGU shall use any alternative emissions
monitoring system, alternative reference method for measuring emissions,
or any other alternative to the emissions monitoring and measurement
requirements of this Section and Sections 225 .250 through 225 .290 of this
Subpart, unless such alternative is promulgated by the USEPA and
approved in writing by the Agency or the use of such alternative is
approved in writing by the Agency and USEPA .
No owner or operator of an EGU shall operate the EGU so as to discharge,
or allow to be discharged, mercury emissions to the atmosphere without
accounting for all such emissions in accordance with the applicable
provisions of this Section, Sections 225 .250 through 225 .290 of this
Subpart, and Subpart I of 40 CFR 75 .
No owner or operator of an EGU shall disrupt the continuous emission
monitoring system, any portion thereof, or any other approved emission
monitoring method, and thereby avoid monitoring and recording mercury

 
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875 Section 225.250
876
Monitoring
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
a)
JCAR350225-0605957r01
mass emissions discharged into the atmosphere, except for periods of
recertification or periods when calibration, quality assurance testing, or
maintenance is performed in accordance with the applicable provisions of
this Section, Sections 225
.250 through 225 .290 of this Subpart, and
Subpart I of 40 CFR 75
.
4)
No owner or operator of an EGU shall retire or permanently discontinue
use of the continuous emission monitoring system or any component
thereof, or any other approved monitoring system under this Subpart,
except under any one of the following circumstances
:
A)
The owner or operator is monitoring emissions from the EGU with
another certified monitoring system that has been approved, in
accordance with the applicable provisions of this Section, Sections
225 .250 through 225 .290 of this Subpart, and Subpart I of 40 CFR
75, by the Agency for use at that EGU and that provides emission
data for the same pollutant or parameter as the retired or
discontinued monitoring system ; or
B)
The owner or operator or designated representative submits
notification of the date of certification testing of a replacement
monitoring system for the retired or discontinued monitoring
system in accordance with Section 225.250(a)(3)(A) of this
Subpart.
e)
Long-term Cold Storage
The owner or operator of an EGU that is in long-term cold storage is subject to
the applicable provisions of 40 CFR 75 for monitoring, recordkeeping, and
reporting for units in long-term cold storage .
Initial Certification and Recertification Procedures for Emissions
The owner or operator of an EGU shall comply with the following initial
certification and recertification procedures for a continuous emissions monitoring
system (i.e., a continuous emission monitoring system or an excepted monitoring
system (sorbent trap monitoring system) under 40 CFR 75 .15) required by Section
225 .240(a)(1) . The owner or operator of an EGU that qualifies for, and for which
the owner or operator elects to use, the low mass emissions excepted
methodology under 40 CFR 75 .81(b) shall comply with the procedures in
subsection (c) of this Section .

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
887
1)
Requirements for Initial Certification
. The owner or operator of an EGU
888
shall ensure that, for each continuous emissions monitoring system
889
required by Section 225.240(a)(l)
of this Subpart (including the automated
890
data acquisition and handling system), the owner or operator successfully
891
completes all of the initial certification testing required under 40 CFR
892
75
.80(d) by the applicable deadline in Section 225
.240(b) of this Subpart.
893
In addition, whenever the owner or operator of an EGU installs a
894
monitoring system to meet the requirements of this Subpart in a location
895
where no such monitoring system was previously installed, the owner or
896
operator must successfully complete the initial certification requirements
897
of 40 CFR 75 .80(d).
898
899
2)
Requirements for Recertification
. Whenever the owner or operator of an
900
EGU makes a replacement, modification, or change in any certified
901
continuous emission monitoring system, or an excepted monitoring system
902
(sorbent trap monitoring system) under 40 CFR 75
.15, and required by
903
Section 225
.240(a)(1) of this Subpart, that may significantly affect the
904
ability of the system to accurately measure or record mercury mass
905
emissions or heat input rate or to meet the quality-assurance and quality-
906
control requirements of 40 CFR 75
.21 or Appendix B to 40 CFR 75, the
907
owner or operator of an EGU shall recertify the monitoring system in
908
accordance with 40 CFR 75
.20(b). Furthermore, whenever the owner or
909
operator of an EGU makes a replacement, modification, or change to the
910
flue gas handling system or the EGU's operation that may significantly
911
change the stack flow or concentration profile, the owner or operator shall
912
recertify each continuous emission monitoring system, and each excepted
913
monitoring system (sorbent trap monitoring system) under 40 CFR 75
.15,
914
whose accuracy is potentially affected by the change, all in accordance
915
with 40 CFR 75 .20(b)
. Examples of changes to a continuous emission
916
monitoring system that require recertification include replacement of the
917
analyzer, complete replacement of an existing continuous emission
918
monitoring system, or change in location or orientation of the sampling
919
probe or site.
920
921
3)
Approval Process for Initial Certification and Recertification . Subsections
922
(a)(3)(A)
through (D) of this Section apply to both initial certification and
923
recertification of a continuous monitoring system required by Section
924
225
.240(a)(1) of this Subpart . For recertifications, replace the words
925
"certification" and "initial certification" with the word "recertification",
926
replace the word "certified" with the word "recertified", and follow the
927
procedures in 40 CFR 75 .20(b)(5) in lieu of the procedures in subsection
928
(a)(3)(E) of this Section .
929

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
930
A)
Notification of Certification
. The owner or operator shall submit
931
to the Agency, USEPA Region 5, and the Administrator of the
932
USEPA written notice of the dates of certification testing, in
933
accordance with Section 225.270
of this Subpart.
934
935
B)
Certification Application
. The owner or operator shall submit to
936
the Agency a certification application for each monitoring system .
937
A complete certification application shall include the information
938
specified in 40 CFR 75 .63.
939
940
C)
Provisional Certification Date
. The provisional certification date
941
for a monitoring system shall be deteniiined in accordance with 40
942
CFR 75 .20(a)(3)
. A provisionally certified monitoring system may
943
be used under this Subpart for a period not to exceed 120 days
944
after receipt by the Agency of the complete certification
945
application for the monitoring system under subsection (a)(3)(B)
of
946
this Section . Data measured and recorded by the provisionally
947
certified monitoring system, in accordance with the requirements
948
of 40 CFR 75, will be considered valid quality-assured data
949
(retroactive to the date and time of provisional certification),
950
provided that the Agency does not invalidate the provisional
951
certification by issuing a notice of disapproval within 120 days
952
after the date of receipt by the Agency of the complete certification
953
application .
954
955
D)
Certification Application Approval Process . The Agency will
956
issue a written notice of approval or disapproval of the certification
957
application to the owner or operator within 120 days after receipt
958
of the complete certification application required by subsection
959
(a)(3)(B)
of this Section . In the event the Agency does not issue
960
such a notice within the 120-day period, each monitoring system
961
that meets the applicable performance requirements of 40 CFR 75
962
and is included in the certification application will be deemed
963
certified for use under this Subpart .
964
965
Approval Notice
. If the certification application is
966
complete and shows that each monitoring system meets the
967
applicable perfoi niance requirements of 40 CFR 75, then
968
the Agency will issue a written notice of approval of the
969
certification application within 120 days after receipt .
970
971
Incomplete Application Notice . If the certification
972
application is not complete, then the Agency will issue a

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
973
written notice of incompleteness that sets a reasonable date
974
by which the owner or operator must submit the additional
975
information required to complete the certification
976
application . If the owner or operator does not comply with
977
the notice of incompleteness by the specified date, then the
978
Agency may issue a notice of disapproval under subsection
979
(a)(3)(D)(iii)
of this Section . The 120-day review period
980
shall not begin before receipt of a complete certification
981
application .
982
983
iii)
Disapproval Notice . If the certification application shows
984
that any monitoring system does not meet the performance
985
requirements of 40 CFR 75 or if the certification
986
application is incomplete and the requirement for
987
disapproval under subsection (a)(3)(D)(ii) of this Section is
988
met, then the Agency will issue a written notice of
989
disapproval of the certification application . Upon issuance
990
of such notice of disapproval, the provisional certification
991
is invalidated by the Agency and the data measured and
992
recorded by each uncertified monitoring system shall not be
993
considered valid quality-assured data beginning with the
994
date and hour of provisional certification (as defined under
995
40 CFR 75
.20(a)(3)) .
The owner or operator shall follow
996
the procedures for loss of certification in subsection
997
(a)(3)(E) of this Section for each monitoring system that is
998
disapproved for initial certification .
999
1000
Audit Decertification . The Agency may issue a notice of
1001
disapproval of the certification status of a monitor in
1002
accordance with Section 225
.260(b) of this Subpart
.
1003
1004
E)
Procedures for Loss of Certification . If the Agency issues a notice
1005
of disapproval of a certification application under subsection
1006
(a)(3)(D)(iii) of this Section or a notice of disapproval of
1007
certification status under subsection (a)(3)(D)(iv) of this Section,
1008
then:
1009
1010
i)
The owner or operator shall substitute the following values,
1011
for each disapproved monitoring system, for each hour of
1012
EGU operation during the period of invalid data specified
1013
under 40 CFR 75 .20(a)(4)(iii) or 75
.21(e) and continuing
1014
until the applicable date and hour specified under 40 CFR
1015
75.20(a)(5)(i) . For a disapproved mercury pollutant

 
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
b)
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
c)
Initial certification and recertification procedures for EGUs using the mercury low
1058
mass emissions excepted methodology under 40 CFR 75 .81(b). The owner or
JCAR350225-0605957r01
concentration monitor and disapproved flow monitor,
respectively, the maximum potential concentration of
mercury and the maximum potential flow rate, as defined in
Sections 2.1.7.1 and 2.1 .4.1 of Appendix A to 40 CFR 75 .
For a disapproved moisture monitoring system and
disapproved diluent gas monitoring system, respectively,
the minimum potential moisture percentage and either the
maximum potential CO2 concentration or the minimum
potential
02
concentration (as applicable), as defined in
Sections 2.1 .5, 2.1 .3.1, and 2 .1 .3 .2 of Appendix A to 40
CFR 75. For a disapproved excepted monitoring system
(sorbent trap monitoring system) under 40 CFR 75 .15 and
disapproved flow monitor, respectively, the maximum
potential concentration of mercury and maximum potential
flow rate, as defined in Sections 2.1 .7.1 and 2 .1 .4.1 of
Appendix A to 40 CFR 75.
ii)
The owner or operator shall submit a notification of
certification retest dates and a new certification application
in accordance with subsections (a)(3)(A) and (B) of this
Section.
Exemption
The owner or operator shall repeat all certification tests or
other requirements that were failed by the monitoring
system, as indicated in the Agency's notice of disapproval,
no later than 30 unit operating days after the date of
issuance of the notice of disapproval .
1)
If an emissions monitoring system has been previously certified in
accordance with 40 CFR 75 and the applicable quality assurance and
quality control requirements of 40 CFR 75 .21 and Appendix B to 40 CFR
75 are fully met, the monitoring system shall be exempt from the initial
certification requirements of this Section .
2)
The recertification provisions of this Section shall apply to an emissions
monitoring system required by Section 225
.240(a)(1) of this Subpart
exempt from initial certification requirements under subsection (a)(1) of
this Section.

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
1059
operator of an EGU qualified to use the mercury low mass emissions excepted
1060
methodology under 40 CFR 75 .81(b) shall meet the applicable certification and
1061
recertification requirements in 40 CFR 75
.81(c) through (f) .
1062
1063
d)
Certification Applications. The owner or operator of an EGU shall submit an
1064
application to the Agency within 45 days after completing all initial certification
1065
or recertification tests required under this Section, including the infoiniation
1066
required under 40 CFR 75 .63 .
1067
1068 Section 225.260 Out of Control Periods for Emission Monitors
1069
1070
a)
Whenever any emissions monitoring system fails to meet the quality-assurance
1071
and quality-control requirements or data validation requirements of 40 CFR 75,
1072
data shall be substituted using the applicable missing data procedures in Subparts
1073
D and I of 40 CFR 75 .
1074
1075
b)
Audit Decertification . Whenever both an audit of an emissions monitoring
1076
system and a review of the initial certification or recertification application reveal
1077
that any emissions monitoring system should not have been certified or recertified
1078
because it did not meet a particular performance specification or other
1079
requirement under Section 225 .250 of this Subpart or the applicable provisions of
1080
40 CFR 75, both at the time of the initial certification or recertification application
1081
submission and at the time of the audit, the Agency will issue a notice of
1082
disapproval of the certification status of such monitoring system . For the
1083
purposes of this subsection, an audit shall be either a field audit or an audit of any
1084
information submitted to the Agency
. By issuing the notice of disapproval, the
1085
Agency revokes prospectively the certification status of the emissions monitoring
1086
system. The data measured and recorded by the monitoring system shall not be
1087
considered valid quality-assured data from the date of issuance of the notification
1088
of the revoked certification status until the date and time that the owner or
1089
operator completes subsequently approved initial certification or recertification
1090
tests for the monitoring system
. The owner or operator shall follow the applicable
1091
initial certification or recertification procedures in Section 225
.250 of this Subpart
1092
for each disapproved monitoring system .
1093
1094 Section 225.261 Additional Requirements to Provide Heat Input Data
1095
1096
The owner or operator of an EGU that monitors and reports mercury mass emissions using a
1097
mercury concentration monitoring system and a flow monitoring system shall also monitor and
1098 report heat input rate at the EGU level using the procedures set forth in 40 CFR 75
.
1099
1 100 Section 225
.263 Monitoring of Gross Electrical Output
1101

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
1102 The owner or operator of an EGU complying with this Subpart by means of Section
1103
225 .230(a)(1) or using electrical output (0) and complying by means of Section 225 .230(b) or
1104
(d) or Section 225 .232 of this Subpart shall monitor gross electrical output of the associated
1105
generator(s) in MWh on an hourly basis.
1106
1107 Section 225.265 Coal Analysis for Input Mercury Levels
1108
1109
a)
The owner or operator of an EGU complying with this Subpart by means of
1110
Section 225 .230(a)(2) or using input mercury levels (Ii) and complying by means
1111
of Section 225 .230(b) or (d) or Section 225 .232 of this Subpart shall :
1112
1113
1)
Perform daily sampling of the coal combusted in the EGU for mercury
1114
content. The owner or operator of such EGU shall collect a minimum of
1115
one 2-lb grab sample per day of operation from the belt feeders anywhere
1116
between the crusher house or breaker building and the boiler . The sample
1117
shall be taken in such a manner so as to provide a representative mercury
1118
content for the coal burned on that day .
1119
1120
2)
Analyze the grab coal sample for the following :
1121
1122
A)
Deteiiiiine the heat content using ASTM D5865-04 or equivalent
1123
approved in writing by the Agency .
1124
1125
B)
Determine the moisture content using ASTM D3173-03 or
1126
equivalent approved in writing by the Agency .
1127
1128
C)
Measure the mercury content using ASTM D6414-01, ASTM
1129
D3684-01, or equivalent approved in writing by the Agency .
1130
1131
3)
The owner or operator of multiple EGUs at the same source using the
1 132
same crusher house or breaker building may take one sample per crusher
1 133
house or breaker building, rather than one per EGU .
1134
1 135
4)
The owner or operator of an EGU shall use the data analyzed under
1 136
subsection (b) of this Section to determine the mercury content in teens of
1137
lbs/trillion Btu .
1138
1 139
The owner or operator of an EGU that must conduct sampling and analysis of coal
1140
pursuant to subsection (a) of this Section shall begin such activity by the
1141
following date :
1142
1143
1)
If the EGU is in daily service, at least 30 days before the start of the month
1144
for which such activity will be required .

 
jCAR350225-0605957r0l
1145
1146
2)
If the EGU is not in daily service, on the day that the EGU resumes
1147
operation.
1148
1149
Section 225 .270 Notifications
1150
1151
The owner or operator of asoorce with one or more EGUs shall submit written notice to the
1152 Agency according to the provisions in 40 CFR 75 .6lforeach EGU or group of EGUs monitored
1153 at a common stack and each non-EGU monitored under 40 CFR 75 .82(b)(2)(ii) .
1154
1155 Section 225.290 Recordkeeping and Reporting
1156
1157
a)
General Provisions
1158
1159
1)
The owner or operator of an EGU and its designated representative shall
1160
comply with all applicable recordkeeping and reporting requirements in
1161
this Section and with all applicable recordkeeping and reporting
1162
requirements of 40 CFR 75 .84.
1163
1164
2)
The owner or operator of an EGU shall maintain records for each month
1165
identiting the emission standard in Section 225 .,230(a) or 225 .237(a) of
1166
this Section with which it is complying or that is applicable for the EGU
1167
and the following records related to the emissions of mercury that the
1168
EGLKs allowed to emit :
1169
1170
A)
Foruo]BG\lfocwhich thcowner oroperator iacoozplv~ng with
1171
this Subpart by means of Section 225 .230(a)(2) or
1172
225 .23 7/a)(l)(}3\or
Jay
,, ,
using input mercury levels to determine t~
c
1173
allowable emissions of the EGU, records of the daily mercury
1174
content of coal used (lbs/trillion Btu) and the daily and monthly
1175
input mercury (lbs), which shall be kept in the file required under
1170
40 CFR 75.84(a).
1177
1178
B)
For an EGU for which the owner or operator of an EGU complying
1179
with this Subpart by means of Section 225 .230(a)(1) or
1180
225 23 7/a)(l\/~\) or using electrical output to determinet
, ,, ,, ,
~
~~
c
1181
allowable emissions of the EGU, records of the daily and monthly
1182
gross c{cctrical output (GWh), which shall be kept in the file
1183
required under 40 CFR 75 .84(a).
1184
1185
3)
The owner or operator of an EGU shall maintain records of the following
1186
Areuch EGTl:
1187

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
1188
A)
Monthly emissions of mercury from the EGU
.
1189
1190
B)
For an EGU for which the owner or operator is complying by
1191
means of Section 225
.230(b) or (d) of this Subpart, records of the
1192
monthly allowable emissions of mercury from the EGU
.
1193
1194
4)
The owner or operator of an EGU that is participating in an Averaging
1195
Demonstration pursuant to Section 225
.232 of this Subpart shall maintain
1196
records identifying all sources and EGUs covered by the Demonstration
1197
for each month and, within 60 days after the end of each calendar month,
1198
calculate and record the actual and allowable mercury emissions of the
1199
EGU for the month and the applicable 12-month rolling period
.
1200
1201
5)
The owner or operator of an EGU shall maintain the following records
1202
related to quality assurance activities conducted for emissions monitoring
1203
systems :
1204
1205
A)
The results of quarterly assessments conducted under Section 2
.2
1206
of Appendix B of 40 CFR 75 ; and
1207
1208
B)
1209
Daily/weekly system integrity checks under Section 2
.6 of
Appendix B of 40 CFR 75
.
1210
1211
6)
1212
The owner or operator of an EGU shall maintain an electronic
copy of all
electronic submittals to the USEPA under 40 CFR 75
.84(f).
1213
1214
7)
The owner or operator of an EGU shall retain all records required by this
1215
Section at the source unless otherwise provided in the CAAPP permit
1216
issued for the source and shall make a copy of any record available to the
1217
Agency upon request
.
1218
1219
b)
Quarterly Reports
. The owner or operator of a source with one or more EGUs
1220
1221
shall submit quarterly reports to the Agency as follows
:
1222
1)
These reports shall include the following information for operation of the
1223
EGUs during the quarter
:
1224
1225
A)
The total operating hours of each EGU and the mercury CEMS, as
1226
1227
also reported in accordance with 40 CFR 75
.
1228
A discussion of any significant changes in the measures used to
1229
control emissions of mercury from the EGUs or the coal supply to
1230
the EGUs, including changes in the source of coal .

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
1231
1232
C)
Summary information on the performance of the mercury CEMS .
1233
When the mercury CEMS was not inoperative, repaired, or
1234
adjusted, except for routine zero and span checks, this shall be
1235
stated in the report
.
1236
1237
D)
If the CEMS downtime was more than 5 .0 percent of the total
1238
operating time for the EGU: the date and time identifying each
1239
period during which the CEMS was inoperative, except for routine
1240
zero and span checks ; the nature of CEMS repairs or adjustments
1241
and a summary of quality assurance data consistent with 40 CFR
1242
75, i.e., the dates and results of the Linearity Test(s) and any
1243
Relative Accuracy Test Audit(s) during the quarter
; a listing of any
1244
days when a required daily calibration was not performed ; and the
1245
date and duration of any periods when the CEMS was out-of-
1246
control as addressed by Section 225 .260 of this Subpart .
1247
1248
2)
The owner or operator shall submit each quarterly report to the Agency
1249
within 45 days following the end of the calendar quarter covered by the
1250
report.
1251
1252
c)
Compliance Certification . The owner or operator of a source with one or more
1253
EGUs shall submit to the Agency a compliance certification in support of each
1254
quarterly report based on reasonable inquiry of those persons with primary
1255
responsibility for ensuring that all of the EGUs' emissions are correctly and fully
1256
monitored. The certification shall state :
1257
1258
1)
That the monitoring data submitted were recorded in accordance with the
1259
applicable requirements of this Section, Sections 225 .240 through 225 .270
1260
and 40 CFR 75, including the quality assurance procedures and
1261
specifications ; and
1262
1263
2)
For an EGU with add-on mercury emission controls, a flue gas
1264
desulfurization system, a selective catalytic reduction system, or a
1265
compact hybrid particulate collector system and for all hours where
1266
mercury data are substituted in accordance with 40 CFR 75 .34(a)(1):
1267
1268
A)
That:
1269
1270
i)
The mercury add-on emission controls, flue gas
1271
desulfurization system, selective catalytic reduction system,
1272
or compact hybrid particulate collector system was
1273
operating within the range of parameters listed in the

 
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
d)
Annual Certification of Compliance
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
2)
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1)
JCAR350225-0605957r0I
quality assurance/quality control program under Appendix
B to 40 CFR 75 ; or
ii)
With regard to a flue gas desulfurization system or a
selective catalytic reduction system, quality-assured SO2
emission data recorded in accordance with 40 CFR 75
document that the flue gas desulfurization system was
operating properly, or quality-assured NOx emission data
recorded in accordance with 40 CFR 75 document that the
selective catalytic reduction system was operating properly,
as
applicable ; and
B)
The substitute data values do not systematically underestimate
mercury emissions .
The owner or operator of a source with one or more EGUs subject to this
Subpart shall submit to the Agency an Annual Certification of Compliance
with this Subpart no later than May 1 of each year and shall address
compliance for the previous calendar year. Such certification shall be
submitted to the Agency, Air Compliance and Enforcement Section, and
the Air Regional Field Office .
Annual Certifications of Compliance shall indicate whether compliance
existed for each EGU for each month in the year covered by the
Certification and certification to that effect . In addition, for each EGU,
the owner or operator shall provide the following :
A)
If complying with this Subpart by means of Section
225 .230(a)(1)(A) or 225 .237(a)(1)(A) :
i)
Actual emissions rate, in lb/GWh, for each 12-month
rolling period ending in the year covered by the
Certification ;
Actual emissions, in lbs, and gross electrical output, in
GWh, for each 12-month rolling period ending in the year
covered by the Certification ; and
Actual emissions, in Ibs, and gross electrical output, in
GWh, for each month in the year covered by the
Certification and in the previous year .

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
1317
1318
B)
If complying with this Subpart by means of Section
1319
225 .230(a)(1)(B) or 225 .237(a)(1)(B):
1320
1321
i)
Actual control efficiency for emissions for each 12-month
1322
rolling period ending in the year covered by the
1323
Certification, expressed as a percent
;
1324
1325
Actual emissions, in ibs, and mercury content in the fuel
1326
fired in such EGU, in lbs, for each 12-month rolling period
1327
ending in the year covered by the Certification; and
1328
1329
iii)
Actual emissions, in lbs, and mercury content in the fuel
1330
fired in such EGU, in lbs, for each month in the year
1331
covered by the Certification and in the previous year
.
1332
1333
C)
If complying with this Subpart by means of Section 225 .230(b) :
1334
1335
i)
Actual emissions and allowable emissions for each 12-
1336
month rolling period ending in the year covered by the
1337
Certification; and
1338
1339
ii)
Actual emissions and allowable emissions, and which
1340
standard of compliance the owner or operator was utilizing
1341
for each month in the year covered by the Certification and
1342
in the previous year.
1343
1344
D)
1345
If complying with this Subpart by means of Section 225
.230(d):
1346
i)
Actual emissions and allowable emissions for all EGUs at
1347
the source for each 12-month rolling period ending in the
1348
1349
year covered by the Certification ; and
1350
Actual emissions and allowable emissions, and which
1351
standard of compliance the owner or operator was utilizing
1352
for each month in the year covered by the Certification and
1353
in the previous year.
1354
1355
E)
If complying with this Subpart by means of Section 225 .232 :
1356
1357
i)
1358
Actual emissions and allowable emissions for all EGUs at
the source in an Averaging Demonstration for each 12-

 
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
ii)
JCAR350225-0605957r01
month rolling period ending in the year covered by the
Certification; and
Actual emissions and allowable emissions, with the
standard of compliance the owner or operator was utilizing
for each EGU at the source in an Averaging Demonstration
for each month for all EGUs at the source in an Averaging
Demonstration in the year covered by the Certification and
in the previous year
.
F)
Any deviations, data substitutions, or exceptions each month and
discussion of the reasons for such deviations, data substitutions, or
exceptions .
3)
All Annual Certifications of Compliance required to be submitted shall
include the following certification by a responsible official
:
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were
prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate
the infoi ination submitted . Based on my inquiry,of the person or persons
directly responsible for gathering the infounation, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and
complete
. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting
false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for
knowing violations.
4)
The owner or operator of an EGU shall submit its first Annual
Certification of Compliance to address calendar year 2009 or the calendar
year in which the EGU commences commercial operation, whichever is
later. Notwithstanding subsection
(d)(2) of this Section, in the Annual
Certifications of Compliance that are required to be submitted by May 1,
2010 and May 1, 2011 to address calendar years 2009 and 2010,
respectively, the owner or operator is not required to provide 12-month
rolling data for any period that ends before June 30, 2010
.
Deviation Reports
. For each EGU, the owner or operator shall promptly notify
the Agency of deviations from requirements of this Subpart . At a minimum, these
notifications shall include a description of such deviations within 30 days after
discovery of the deviations, and a discussion of the possible cause of such
deviations, any corrective actions, and any preventative measures taken .

 
JCAR350225-0605957r01
1401
f)
Quality Assurance RATA Reports
. The owner or operator of an EGU shall
1402
submit to the Agency, Air Compliance and Enforcement Section, the quality
1403
assurance RATA report for each EGU or group of EGUs monitored at a common
1404
stack and each non-EGU under 40 CFR 75
.82(b)(2)(ii) within 45 days after
1405
completing a quality assurance RATA.
1406
1407
Section 225 .295
Treatment of Mercury Allowances
1408
1409
Any mercury allowances allocated to the Agency by the USEPA shall be treated as follows
:
1410
1411
a)
No such allowances shall be allocated to any owner or operator of an EGU or
1412
other sources of mercury emissions into the atmosphere or discharges into the
1413
waters of the State
.
1414
1415
b)
The Agency shall hold all allowances allocated by the USEPA to the State
. At the
1416
end of each calendar year, the Agency shall instruct the USEPA to retire
1417
permanently all such allowances
.

Back to top