RECEIVEDCLERK'S
OFFICE
FEB 2 4 2006
IN THE MATTER OF :
)
Pollution
STATE
QF
ILLINOIS
Board
CLEAN CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLITION )
R06-19
DEBRIS FILL OPERATIONS
)
(Rulemaking -Land)
(35 ILL. ADM . CODE PART 1100)
)
NOTICE OF FILING
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk,
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W
. Randolph, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Matt Dunn
Environmental Bureau Chief
Office of the Attorney General
James R. Thompson Center
100 W
. Randolph, 12' Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
ATTACHED SERVICE LIST
DATE1021
North
: p?
Grand
-d 3
Avenue
-
O
G
East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
(217) 782-5544
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
General Counsel
Office of Legal Counsel
Illinois Dept . of Natural Resources
One Natural Resources Way
Springfield, Illinois 62702-1271
Amy Antoniolli
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W
. Randolph St .
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have today filed with the Office of the Clerk of the
Illinois Pollution Control Board an ERRATA SHEET #2, RESPONSE TO COMMENTS,
and
ADDITIONAL TESTIMONTY OF CHRISTIAN J . LIEBMAN
a copy of each of which is
herewith served upon you .
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
0'/ii/.ZWe.d'
Ste .i)
. 'e Flowers
Assistant Counsel
Division of Legal Counsel
By:
Printing Service List
. . . .
ntere
y
Tiffany Chappell
r
Page I of I
Total number of participants : 7
h ttp://www
.ipcb .staie .il .us/cool/extetnal/casenotifyNew .asp?caseid=12805¬ifytype=Se
.. . 2/23/2006
Party Name
Role
City & State Phone/Fax
217/782-
!EPA
East1021
North Grand Avenue Springfield
5544
Petitioner
P .O . Box 19276
IL 62794-
217/782-
9276
9807
Kyle Rominger
Stephanie Flowers, Attorney
700 First Mercantile Bank
Springfield
217/544-
Brown . Hay & Stephens_L_LP
Building
IL 62705-
8491
Interested Party
205 South Fifth St ., P .O
.
2459
217/241-
Box 2459
3111
Claire A . Manning
Illinois Association of Aggregate Producers
Springfield
217/241-
Interested Party
1115 S
. Second Street
IL 62704
1639
John Henrickson, Executive Director
217/782-
IllinoisDepartment of Natural Resp cc s
Interested Party
One Natural Resources
SpringfieldIL
62702-
1809
Way
1271
217/524-9640
Virginia Young
IDOT
2300 S Dirksen Parkway
Springfield
217/785-
Interested Party
IL 62764
4246
Steven Gobelman, Geologic/Waste Assessment Specialist
City of Chicago
- Mayor's
Office of
121 N . LaSalle Street
Chicago
I nter governmental Affairs
312/744-
City Hall - Room 406
IL 60602
2597
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOA4ELERK'SC
E
OFFICE
I V E D
FEB 2 4 2006
IN THE MATTER OF
:
)
Pollution
STATE OF
Control
ILLINOISBoard
CLEAN CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLITION )
R06-19
DEBRIS FILL OPERATIONS
)
(Rulemaking -Land)
(35 ILL
. ADM . CODE PART 1100)
)
ERRATA SHEET NUMBER 2
NOW COMES the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency ("Illinois EPA'), by and
through one of its attorneys, Stephanie Flowers, and submits this ERRATA SHEET NUMBER 2
to the Illinois Pollution Control Board ("Board") and the participants on the Service List
.
In response to comments filed by the IAAP and Rockford Sand and Gravel and in response to
requests for clarification from the Board and from the public at the January 26, 2006 hearing, the
Agency would like to propose the following changes to its proposal
.
1
. Section 1100 .101(b)(3)
The IEPA proposes to make the following underlined change to Sections 1100
.101(b)(3). The
change is to clarify the applicable Illinois Department of Transportation specifications
.
b)
This Part does not apply to :
3)
The use of CCDD as
fill
material in an excavation other than a current or
former quarry or mine if
[the] use
complies with Illinois Department of
Transportation specifications
(Section 22 .51(b)(4)(B) of the Act)
;
Board Note
:
The Illinois Department of Transportation ("DOT"1
specifications applicable to the use of CCDD as fill can be found at
Articles 107 .22 and 202
.03 of DOT's "Standard Specifications for Road
and Bridge Construction", January 1, 2002 edition
. According to the
definition of Engineer in Article 101
.16 of the DOT specifications. this
exemption applies to DOT, a county, a municipality, or a township
.
2. Section 1100 .103 Definitions
The IEPA proposes to make the following underlined changes to Section 1100.103, adding
language to the definition of "CCDD fill operation" and "clean construction or demolition
debris". The changes are to address concerns regarding what is an excavation and what is
uncontaminated soil .
"CCDD fill operation" means the use of CCDD as fill material in a current or
former quarry, mine, or other excavation . For purposes of this Part, excavation
does not include holes, trenches, or other similar earthmoving operations
performed as part of normal construction, removal or maintenance of a building,
utility, or road.
"Clean construction or demolition debris" means uncontaminated broken
concrete without protruding metal bars, bricks, rock, stone, reclaimed asphalt
pavement, or soil generatedfrom
construction or demolition activities .
Clean construction or demolition debris does not include uncontaminated soil
generated during construction, remodeling, repair, and demolition of utilities,
structures, and roads provided the uncontaminated soil is not commingled with
any clean construction or demolition debris or other waste. For purposes of this
Part, uncontaminated soil may include incidental amounts of stone, clay, rock,
sand, gravel, roots and other vegetation
.
To the extent allowed by federal law, clean construction or demolition debris
shall not be considered "waste" if it is (i) used as fill material outside of a setback
zone if the fill is placed no higher than the highest point ofelevation existing prior
to the filling immediately adjacent to the fill area, and if covered by sufficient
uncontaminated soil to support vegetation within 30 days of the completion of
filling or if covered by a road or structure, or (ii) separated or processed and
returned to the economic mainstream in the form
ofraw materials or products, if
it is not speculatively accumulated and, if used as a fill material, it is used in
accordance with item (i) within 30 days of its generation, or (iii) solely broken
concrete without protruding metal bars used for erosion control, or (iv) generated
from the construction or demolition of a building, road, or other structure and
used to construct, on the site where the construction or demolition has taken
place, a manmade functional structure not to exceed 20 feet above the highest
point of elevation of the property immediately adjacent to the new manmade
functional structure as that elevation existed prior to the creation of that new
structure, provided that the structure shall be covered with sufficient soil
materials to sustain vegetation or by a road or structure, and further provided
that no such structure shall be constructed within a home rule municipality with a
population over 500,000 without the consent of the municipality. (Section
3 .160(b) of the Act)
3 . Section 1100.201(b)
The IEPA proposes to make the following underlined change to Section 1100 .201(b) to clarify
materials allowed for use as fill .
(b)
CCDD fill operations must not accept material other than CCDD for use as fill.
BOARD NOTE :
uncontaminated soil that is being placed as fill material in a unit. This does not
prohibit non-CCDD material, such as uncontaminated soil and other non-waste
material from being placed as fill material in a unit . Pursuant to Section 3 .160 of
the Act, when uncontaminated soil is commingled with CCDD, the
uncontaminated soil is considered CCDD . Accordingly other non-waste material
commingled with CCDD is considered CCDD .
4
. Sections 1100 .204(a) and (b)
The IEPA proposes to make the following underlined change to Sections 1100 .204(a) and (b) .
The change is to provide clarity that "safe manner" and "safe and efficient manner" mean in
conformance with the provisions of the Act and regulations adopted thereunder . This language
is consistent with language used throughout the statutes and the administrative code .
Placement of fill material
Fill material must be placed in a safe manner that protects human health and the
environment
in conformance with the provisions of the Act and regulations
adopted thereunder .
5
. Section 1100.204(h)
The IEPA proposes to make the following underlined change to Section 1100 .204(h). The
change is to clarify that placement of non-CCDD materials such as uncontaminated soil or other
non-waste above grade is not regulated by the IEPA and therefore may be used to comply with
engineered plans and local guidelines for storm water management and erosion control
.
h)
Fill Elevation
The owner or operator must not place CCDD used as fill
ne-higher that the
highest point of elevation existing prior to the
flling immediately adjacent to the
fill area. (Section 3
.160(b) of the Act)
Board Note:
This does not prohibit non-CCDD material, such as
uncontaminated soil and other non-waste material from being placed above grade
in accordance with the Act and regulations adopted thereunder to increase
elevations at the fill site .
-S -
-
D D
- --
6
. Section 1100
.205(a)(1) .
The IEPA proposes to make the following underlined change to Section 1100 .205(a)(1). The
change is to address concerns regarding the manner in which incoming loads are checked . The
language also provides for alternate methods to be approved in the Agency permit .
a)
Routine Inspections
1)
An inspector designated by the facility must inspect every load before its
acceptance at the facility utilizing : (i) an elevated structure, (ii) a
designated ground level inspection area, or (iii) an other acceptable
method as specified in the Agency permit . In addition to a visual
inspection, the inspector must use an instrument with a photo ionization
detector utilizing a lamp of 10.6
eV or greater or an instrument with a
flame ionization detector, or other monitoring devices approved by the
Agency, to inspect each load . Any reading above zero using any of these
instruments must result in the rejection of the inspected load . In addition,
any reading above zero on any monitoring device used by the Agency
during an Agency inspection must result in the rejection of the inspected
load.
7
. Sections 1100.205(a)(1) and
(b)(1)
The IEPA proposes to make the following underlined change to Sections 1100 .205(a)(1) and
(b)(1). The change is to address concerns that the manufacturer's margin of error as well as
background levels at the site may affect instrument readings . Also, the procedures the owner or
operator intends to use to determine background levels for the load inspection area will need to
be set forth in the permit application
.
b)
Random Inspections
1)
In addition to the inspections required under subsection (a) of this Section,
an inspector designated by the facility must conduct a discharge inspection
of at least one randomly selected load delivered to the facility each day.
The driver of the randomly selected load must be directed to discharge the
load at a separate, designated location within the facility . The inspector
must conduct an inspection of the discharged material that includes, but is
not limited to, additional visual inspection and additional instrument
testing using the instruments required under subsection (a)(1) of this
Section. All instruments shall be interpreted based on the manufacturer's
margin of error. Any rading above zero Any reading in excess of
background levels using any of these instruments must result in the
rejection of the inspected load . In addition, any reading above zero on any
monitoring device used by the Agency during an Agency inspection must
result in the rejection of the inspected load .
4
DATED: d'01 :3
-- 0(.e
1021 North Grand Aver East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
(217) 782-5544
Respectfully submitted,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
B :
St
m.4".
=came Flowers
Assistant Counsel
Division of Legal Counsel
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF :
)
CLEAN CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLITION )
R06-19
DEBRIS FILL OPERATIONS UNDER P.A
.
)
Rulemaking -Land
94-272 (35 ILL . ADM
. CODE PART 1100)
)
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS REGEIpFEf)
FEB 2 q 2006
NOW COMES the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency ("llll~ o
,l~l
0 d
ST~t~Qn Control
submits the following response to the comments filed by the Illinois
~ociation of Aggregate
Producers ("IAAP") on December 7, 2005 and the comments filed by Rockford Sand and Gravel
on December 19, 2005 .
As noted in the Illinois EPA's Statement of Reasons, the IAAP is one of the parties the
Illinois EPA worked with in developing the proposed rules
. The IAAP and its members,
including Rockford Sand and Gravel, provided a great deal of feedback to the Illinois EPA, and
many of their comments and suggestions were incorporated into the initial proposal
. Likewise,
many of the language changes and additions suggested by the IAAP and Rockford Sand and
Gravel in their comments filed with the Board have been incorporated into the Illinois EPA's
ERRATA SHEET #2
. ERRATA SHEET #2 has been filed with the Board and proposes several
changes to the initial language of the Illinois EPA's proposed rules
. The Illinois EPA
appreciates the time and effort the IAAP and its members have put into the development of the
proposed rules .
Page I
Rockford Sand and Gravel Comment #1
Rockford Sand and Gravel requests that the IDOT exemption at 1100
.101(b)(3) be
clarified as to who may use this exemption and which specifications should be followed to
ensure activities are exempt
. In response, the Illinois EPA has proposed language in number 1
.
of its ERRATA SHEET #2 to clarify both of these issues
.
Rockford Sand and Gravel Comment #2
Rockford Sand and Gravel requests a definition of the term uncontaminated soil
. In
response, the Illinois EPA has proposed language at number 2 of its ERRATA SHEET #2 to
define the term uncontaminated soil .
Rockford Sand and Gravel also requests clarification on the concept of'commingled
. In
response, the Illinois EPA has proposed language at number 3 of its ERRATA SHEET #2 to'
clarify that uncontaminated soil and other non-waste material that is commingled with CCDD is
considered CCDD
. However, Rockford Sand and Gravel provides an example of a site that
accepted CCDD prior to regulation and now accepts only uncontaminated soil and asks whether
the uncontaminated soil is considered to be commingled with the CCDD previously accepted and
therefore, whether a permit is needed for this site
. In response the Illinois EPA states that this
facility would not require a permit under these regulations
. In this situation, the fill area would
be defined in an application
. The application should contain drawings and a description that
would specify the top of the fill area and that everything above that elevation would be
uncontaminated soil or other non-waste material
.
Additionally, Rockford Sand and Gravel requests the definition of CCDD be amended to
read,-"Clean
construction or demolition debris does not include uncontaminated soil generated
Page
2
during construction, remodeling, repair, and demolition of utilities, structures, and roads
provided the uncontaminated soil is not commingled with any clean construction or demolition
debris other than uncontaminated soil
or
with any other waste ."
In response, the Illinois EPA
does not agree that this change is needed . The Illinois EPA believes the statutory definition of
CCDD is clear that uncontaminated soil, which is not commingled with CCDD, is not considered
CCDD and would not be regulated under Part 1100 . As further clarification, the Illinois EPA at
number 5 of its ERRATA SHEET #2 explains in a Board Note that uncontaminated soil and
other non-waste material placed as cover material for the CCDD fill site is not considered CCDD
and therefore may be placed above grade without conflicting with the statute .
Rockford Sand and Gravel Comment #3
Rockford Sand and Gravel requests that the first sentence of 1100 .204(g) be deleted
because the requirement imposes a responsibility on the operator that is more severe than the
IPCB noise regulations . The Illinois EPA does not agree with this comment . The second
sentence of 1100 .204(g) specifically uses the Act and the Board regulations as the noise level
standards the site must maintain . The Illinois EPA does not intend to require more stringent noise
level standards than those set by the Actor Board regulations . The first sentence of 1100 .204(g)
relates to the design of the site and allows the Illinois EPA to request in the permit application a
description and plan of how the site intends to comply . As an alternative, the Illinois EPA does
not object to the combination of the two sentences to read, "The facility must be designed,
constructed, and maintained to minimize the level of equipment noise audible outside the site
.
The facility must so that the facility does not cause or contribute to a violation of the Board's
noise regulations or Section 24 of the Act ."
Page 3
Rockford Sand and Gravel Comment #4
Rockford Sand and Gravel requests that the definition of filled area be expanded to
exclude the use of recycled pavement materials for such uses as road base material, a base
material in parking lots, or a subgrade material in highway embankments . In response, the
Illinois EPA does not consider these uses to be "the use of CCDD as fill in a current or former
quarry, mine, or other excavation" for which permits are required . For further clarification, the
Illinois EPA has at number 2 of its ERRATA SHEET #2 specified that the term excavation "does
not include holes, trenches, or other similar earthmoving operations performed as part of normal
construction, removal or maintenance of a building, utility, or road ."
IAAP Comment #1
The IAAP suggests amending Section 1100 .204(a) to state that fill material must be
placed "in conformance with existing reclamation plan requirements, zoning requirements, local,
state and federal regulations, or development plans
." The IAAP suggests this change in order to
create standards for the Illinois EPA to use when determining whether fill material is placed "in a
safe manner that protects human health and the environment
."' The language suggested by the
IAAP is not appropriate because there is no indication that compliance with the referenced
requirements will guarantee that fill is being placed in a safe manner and that human health and
the environment is being adequately protected and because it would require the Illinois EPA to
determine what state and local requirements apply to a CCDD fill operation and whether the
operation is in compliance with all of the requirements
. However, in response, the Illinois EPA,
has proposed alternate language at number 4 of its ERRATA SHEET #2 to provide a standard
Page 4
for the Illinois EPA to use when determining whether fill material is placed "in a safe manner
that protects human health and the environment ."
IAAP Comment #2
The IAAP suggests adding language to Section 1100
.204(h) that would allow the
Illinois EPA to approve the placement of CCDD as fill above grade (i.e., "higher than the highest
point of elevation existing prior to the filling immediately adjacent to the fill area") . This change
is suggested because "reclamation plans or development plans approved by other agencies may
call for fill to be placed at higher elevations ." The language suggested by the IAAP is not
appropriate because it would make the proposed rules inconsistent with the definition of CCDD
in the Act . However, in response, the Illinois EPA has proposed language at number 5 of its
ERRATA SHEET #2 to clarify that non-CCDD material such as uncontaminated soil or other
non-waste material may be place above grade to increase elevations at the site
.
IAAP Comment #3 .
The IAAP suggests amending Section 1100 .205(a)(1) to specify that load inspections
must be performed "utilizing : (i) an elevated structure, (ii) a designated ground level inspection
area, or (iii) an other acceptable method ." In response, the Illinois EPA has proposed language
at number 6 of its ERRATA SHEET #2 to incorporate this suggestion and to add that other
acceptable methods should be specified in the Agency permit. This added language would
provide consistency with other provisions in the rules, and with other Illinois EPA permit
programs, which allow the use of alternatives as long the alternatives are approved in a permit .
Page
5
IAAP Comment #4
The IAAP suggests amending Sections 1100 .205(a)(1) and
(b)(1) by adding the following
sentence
: "All instruments shall be calibrated utilizing established background levels and
interpreted based on the manufacturer's margin of error
." This language is suggested because
the IAAP states that background readings at a site may cause a monitoring device to
. register
above zero at all times
. In response, the Illinois EPA has proposed language at number 7 of its
ERRATA SHEET #2 to incorporate the language suggested by the IAAP .
IAAP Comment #5
The IAAP suggests adding language to Section 1100 .205(g) that would require CCDD
fill operation personnel to be trained "in accordance with an Agency training program developed
in consultation with the aggregate mining industry ." The IAAP suggests this addition to ensure
that all personnel working at permitted CCDD sites receive consistent training
. The language
suggested by the IAAP is not appropriate because the Illinois EPA currently does not have the
resources to either independently develop or administer such a program . Further discussion with
the IAAP on this topic has lead to the agreement between the IAAP and the Illinois EPA to forgo
making this change to Part 1100 . The Illinois EPA will instead work with the aggregate mining
industry in the development of an industry program and training manual and will provide
information regarding training resources to permit applicants .
IAAP comment #6
The IAAP suggests changing Section 1100 .302 to allow permit applicants to notify local
public officials of a permit request via the Illinois EPA's website if the facility was previously
Page
6
approved through state or local permitting
. The rationale for this change is that the notice could
potentially jeopardize
zoning
already obtained by active mines because the local officials may be
opposed to the mines accepting CCDD for use as fill
.
The Illinois EPA objects to the suggested change . The
notification requirement was.
proposed to ensure that local officials are aware of permitted activities taking place in their
jurisdiction . Previous local or state approval of other activities such as
mining does not ensure
that local officials have received adequate notice that the facility will be used as a CCDD fill
operation.' The Illinois EPA requires similar notifications for all of its other land-related permits
(i.e., permits issued by the Illinois EPA's Bureau of Land)
. Therefore, the notification
requirement as proposed by the Illinois EPA will make the process for issuing CCDD fill
operation permits consistent with the process for issuing other land-related permits
.
Furthermore, local officials often contact the Illinois EPA about permitted facilities and
other regulated activities in their area . The notification requirement will ensure that the local
officials are made aware of permitted facilities in their jurisdiction in a timely manner . It is
unlikely that officials will be checking the Illinois EPA's website on a routine basis to determine
whether a permit application has been submitted for a CCDD fill operation in their jurisdiction
.
The Illinois EPA understands the IAAP's concerns about the possibility of local officials
raising issues about a mine accepting CCDD for use as fill if they are not aware that such activity
is taking place and object to it . However, ensuring that public officials are aware of Illinois EPA
permitted activities within their jurisdiction is precisely why the Illinois EPA requires that local
officials be notified
. If there are misconceptions about Illinois EPA permitted activities at a site,
Please note that the Illinois EPA's issuance of CCDD fill operation permits is not subject to the local siting
approval requirements in Section 39(c) of the Act .
Page 7
the Illinois EPA will be happy to discuss the matter with the local officials to clear up any
misunderstandings .
IAAP comment #7
Finally, the IAAP has requested that the Board direct the Illinois EPA "to consult with
the aggregates industry and construction industry in order to begin formulating a definition of
`uncontaminated soil'." In response, the Illinois EPA has proposed language, developed in
consultation with the IAAP, at number 2 of its ERRATA SHEET #2 to define the term
uncontaminated soil .
Respectfully submitted,
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
By:
S e anie Flowers
Assistant Counsel
Division of Legal Counsel
DATED:p?
-
a3
-D(o
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276
(217) 782-5544
Page 8
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
IN THE MATTER OF :
RECEIVED
CLERK'S O5)FICE
CLEAN CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLI
2
a ~OO6
R06-19
DEBRIS FILL OPERATIONS
STATE OF IhLINOIkulemaking-Land)
(35 ILL. ADM. CODE PART 1100)
Pollution Con rol B dfo
ADDITIONAL TESTIMONY OF CHRISTIAN J
. LIEBMAN
My name is Christian J . Liebman
. I am the Manager of the Solid Waste Unit in the
Permit Section within the Bureau of Land of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
("Agency")
. I was present and testified at the first hearing in this matter on January 26, 2006
.
At that hearing, the Board requested that the Agency provide additional information regarding
the facilities that the Agency anticipates will be regulated by this Part 1100, such as number of
facilities, the size, and where the facilities are located
. The Board also requested information on
the costs associated with the permitting process to both a typical facility and to the Agency
. I
submit the following testimony in response to those inquiries
.
The Agency's estimates of the costs associated with the permitting process to both a
typical facility and to the Agency are presented on the attached Exhibit A
. The Agency
consulted an industry corporation to provide the industry cost estimate and a professional
engineering fine to provide the consulting engineer estimate
. The Agency's estimated costs for
permitting these facilities under Part 1100 are based on the salaries, including benefits and
overhead, of new personnel hired to perform permit reviews and site inspections
.
There are currently 83 sites that have submitted an interim authorization application for
the use of CCDD as fill in a current or former mine, quarry, or other excavation . The Agency
anticipates that these facilities will also seek to be permitted under Part 1100
. The attached
Exhibit B shows the location of these facilities on an Illinois counties map and the attached
Exhibit C is a bar graph showing the breakdown of sites by estimated annual volume
.
ByChristian
: J
. Liebman, P.E.
Date
: 2 2%-2 op (,
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1021
North Grand Avenue East
P.O
. Box 19276
Springfield, IL 62794-9276
INDUSTRY'S ESTIMATE OF COST OF COMPLIANCE
Explanations
for Backup PID
Assuming 1/2 Person
Assuming 10-acre Site
CONSULTING ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
Estimated
Explanations
Requirement
Cost
Preparing Closure Certification
$3,000.00 1 office day for engineer
& I day in field for 2 techs
AGENCY'S ESTIMATE OF COST TO STATE OF ILLINOIS
Estimated
Explanations
Item
Cost
Yearly Salary
$ 55,000.00
Salary plus Benefits
$ 77,000
.00
Salary plus Benefits plus Overhead
$ 105,644 .00
Total Annual Cost to State
$ 792,330 .00
Exhibit A
Benefits assumed to be 40% of Salary
Overhead includes cost of
building maitenance, utilities
and adminstration
For 4 engineers to review permits
and 3 1/2 inspectors
∎
Requirement
Estimated
Cost
Interim Authorization Notification
$ 3,000
.00
Permit Application for CCDD Fill
$ 10,000 .00
Permit Compliance (per year)
$ 5,000.00
Recordkeeping (per year)
$ 60,000 .00
Annual Report
$ 1,000.00
Closure Activity
$ 10,000
.00
Post-Closure Care Certification
$ 5,000
.00
Disposal Sites for Clean Construction Demolition Debris
HANCO
ROL ULVID
RR
JO DAV2E
HENRY
OX
N
CAROLL
AAHQ[SM
aTEHIENXON
ARK
OGLE
BUREAU
RUENA
IARW AIL
OM'
OD ORD
4GO
LAULLE
LE
LD =ON
ALL
LRUNDY
LAX£
D07A
S
ERNB.10
Facilities that have notified Illinois EPA as of February 1, 2006
Exhibit B
a
Less than 10,000
Breakdown of Sites by Estimated Annual Volume
10,000 to 50,000
50,000 to 100,000
Cubic Yards
100,000 to 150,000
Greater than 150,000
STATE OF ILLINOIS
)
COUNTY OF SANGAMON
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, on oath state that I have served the attached
ERRATA SHEET #2,
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS,
and
ADDITIONAL TESTIMONTY OF CHRISTIAN J
.
LIEBMAN
upon the persons to whom they are directed, by placing a copy of each in an
envelope addressed to
:
Dorothy Gunn, Clerk,
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R
. Thompson Center
100 W
. Randolph, Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(Express Mail)
Matt Dunn
Environmental Bureau Chief
Office of the Attorney General
James R
. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph, 12`h
Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Amy Antoniolli
Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W
. Randolph St.
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(Express Mail)
ATTACHED SERVICE LIST
and mailing it by First Class Mail from Springfield, Illinois on February
A006, with
sufficient postage affixed
.
--?~
1M Jt,P
8J-;
SUBSCRII~ED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME
This ca3 day of February, 2006 .
Notary Public
.5
MncowssloeNOTARY
BRENDA
OFFICIAL
MW, STATE
BOEHNERSEALOF
IWNOIS
'->tiw,
•arr•.r.4444444644
s 11
.~
3-2oos
•:
4,-:~
General Counsel
Office of Legal Counsel
Illinois Dept
. of Natural Resources
One Natural Resources Way
.
Springfield, Illinois 62702-1271
I
Total number of participants : 7
http://www.ipcb
.state.il.us/cool/extemaUcasenotifyNew
.asp?caseid=12805¬ifytype=Se . . . 2/22/2006
Printing Service List . ...
Page I of
Party Name
Role
City & State Phone/Fax
217/782-
IEPAPetitioner
PEast1021
.O . Box
North
19276Grand
Avenue
9276IL
Springfield62794-
217/782-55449807
Kyle Rominger
Stephanie Flowers, Attorney
700 First Mercantile Bank
217/544-
Brown . Hav & Sfeohens LLP
Building
Springfield
8491
Interested Party
205 South Fifth St ., P .O
.
IL 62705-
217/241-
Box 2459
2459
3111
Claire A . Manning
Illinois Association ofAggregate Producers
Springfield 217/241-
Interested Party
1115 S . Second Street
IL 62704
1639
John Henricksen, Executive Director
217/782-
Interested
Illinois Department
Party
of Natural Resources
One
WayNatural
Resources
SpringfieldIL
127162702-
9640217/524-1809
Virginia Young
IDOT
Springfield 217/785-
Interested Party
2300 S Dirksen Parkway
IL 62764
4246
Steven Gobelman, Geologic/Waste Assessment Specialist
Intergovernmental
Interested
it
f ChicagoParty-
Mayor's
AffairsOffice
of
121
City HallN
. LaSalle
- Room
Street406
IL
Chicago60602
2597312/744-
Tiffany Chappell
