Kent Logan, President
    Donald Massier, Vice President
    Donald Markgraf, ClerklTreasurer
    Lloyd Hawks, Trustee
    Roger Erkert, Trustee
    Dean Falkner, District Director
    RECEIVED
    March 1, 2002
    CLERK’S
    OFFw~r
    MAR 5
    2002
    STATE OF IWNOIS
    Pollution Control Board
    RE:
    Support for IEPA Carbonaceous BOD Proposal
    Before the IPCB
    Dear Ms. Gumi:
    The use of carbonaceous BOD as a parameter for measuring the efficiency of secondary
    treatment processes has been a standard for many decades. Also, the concern of interference
    from nitrogenous compounds in the
    BOD-5
    test has been a concern traceable in literature from
    the 1930s. It has further been demonstrated that while the nitrogenous interference is sufficiently
    high to need correction, it is nevertheless a small portion of the total BOD from nitrogenous
    compounds.’ Consequently, in 1984 the USEPA authorized the use of CBOD for determining
    secondary treatment process efficiencies.
    In general, treatment plants strive for the highest efficiency and, therefore, the lowest CBOD
    effluent that their individual processes can achieve. Typical CBOD effluents range from 3 to 9
    mg/i. It is the District’s belief it is not necessary to deviate from IEPA’s suggested CBOD
    parameters. The BOD tests by theirvery nature, have a large standard deviation. For example, a
    fmal effluent CBOD of 6 mg/l could easily have a standard deviation of plus or minus 2 or a
    range from 4 to 8 mg/l and, therefore, statistically all numbers between 4 and 8 are the same as
    the mean of6.
    It is further suggested that rather than reduce the limits suggested by IEPA, the Board may
    consider an approach ofsetting warning limits or limits that would rather than trigger compliance
    enforcement, initiate investigations by the POTWs into the reasons for the higher-than-usual
    reported values. As example, the warning limit could be triggered when a POTW discharges
    CBOD above the
    80th
    percentile ofstandard.
    1
    Chemistry for Sanitary Engineers published 1960. Clare N. Sawyer, Chapter 23
    Lation
    1-
    3333 Kishwaukee Street
    P.O. Box 7480
    Rockford, Illinois 61126-7480
    I~8-r~4~r~
    815) 387-7400
    ii 11
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    Attn: Dorothy Gunn, Clerk, re Docket R02-11
    James R. Thompson Center
    100 West Randolph Street, Suite 11-500
    Chicago, Illinois 60601
    y

    Dorothy Gunn, IPCB
    Page 2
    In conciusion, it is the District’s position that the standards as proposed by the IEPA for
    carbonaceous BOD are adequate and fully protective ofthe environment. Treatment plants strive
    to do the most efficient job of treatment that their individual processes will allow. Last, the
    Board may wish to consider a standard with warning limits to trigger actions at the POTWs.
    Thank you foryour consideration in this matter.
    Sincerely,
    Dean Faikner
    District Director
    Letter\GunnIPCB

    Back to top