NOTICE OF FIL1T~G
STATE OF IWNOIs
Assistant CounselDivision ofLegal Counsel
DATED: April 15, 2002
FACILITY-RELATED STREAM SURVEY (FRSS) REPORT

Table 10. Concentrations of metals, nutrients, and organochiorine compounds

i~PR—15-2002 16:47

2177829807

P.02

BEFORE

THE

ILL

f~4i~ROL

BOARDAPR 152002

N THE MATTER OF:

WATER QUALITY AMENDMENTS TO

IlL

Adm.

Code 302.208(e)-(g), 302.504(a),

302.575(d), 303.444,309.141(h); and

PROPOSED

Iii. Adm, Code 301.267,

301.313, 301.413, 304.120, and 309.157

NOTICE OF FIL1T~G

Dorothy Gunn, Clerk

Pollution Control Board

100 West Randolph Street

Suite 11-500

Chicago, Illinois 60601

Mathew Dunn

illinois Attorney General’s Office

Environmental Control Division

James R. Thompson Center

100 WestRandolph Street

Chicago, illinois 60601

Attached Service List

Marie E. Tipsord

illinois Pollution Control Board

James R. Thompson Center

100 WestRandolph Street, Suite 11-500

Chicago, Illinois 60601

Legal Service

Illinois Department ofNaturalResources

524

South Second Street

Springfield, Illinois 6270 l-17~7

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that I have today filedwith the Office ofthe Clerk ofthe Pollution Control

Board the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s COMMENTS, a copy ofwhich is herewith

servedupon you.

ILLINOIS ENViRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Sanjay K Sofat

Assistant Counsel

Division ofLegal Counsel

Dated: April 15, 2002

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

1021 North Grand Avenue East

Springfield, illinois 62794-9276

(217) 782-5544

RECEIVED

CLERK’S OFFICE

)

STATE OF IWNOIS

PollutIon Control Board

R02-11.

(Rulemaking

Water)

~f/

ThIs

1~XLINGPRINTED

ON RECYCLED PAPER

i~iPR15-2002 16:48

2177829807

P.03

~~iVED

CL!~g’S

OFFICE

BEFORE

THI~

ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

i. 5 2002

STATE OF IWNOIs

Pollution Control

Board

iN THE MATTER OF:

WATER QUALITY AMENDMENTS TO

Ill. Adm. Code 302 208(e)-(g), 3

02.504(a),

302.575(d), 303.444, 309.141(h); and

PROPOSED 35111. Adm. Code 301.267,

301.3 13, 301.413, 304.120, and

309.157

AGENCY’S COMEMNTS

THE ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (“Agency”) respectfully

submits its comments in the above-entitled matter to the illinois Pollution Control Board(“Board”).

The Age~icyappreciates this opportunity to submit comments supplementing the comments it

presented during the two public hearings. These comments will address request for additional

information made duringthe March

2002 Board Public Hearing and the Agency’s proposal

regarding the implementationprocedures.

I. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Illinois’ Section 303(d~list:

Albert Ettinger oftheEnvironmental Law & Policy Center requested a clarification on whether the

Mississippi Riveris listed as impaired for dissolved oxygen in the illinois’ Section 303(d) list.

See

Transcript for March 6, 2002 Hearing (“Tr.”), p.3g. The Agency’s review ofthe 1998 Section

303(d) list revealed that the Mississippi River is not listed as impaired because ofdissolved oxygen

problems.

Stmam Survey Reports:

Board Member Girard inquired ifthere are any published models that show a relationship between

the ammonia effluent limits and its impact on the oxygen demand from the ammonia in aquatic

environment. Tr, pp. 41-42. The Agency witness, Bob Mosher, testified that he is notpersonally

aware of any suchmodels, however, believes that the Agency’s stream studies would be helpful to

)

R02-ll

(Rulemaking

Water)

I~PR—15—2002 16:48    

2177829807

2177829807  P.04

mistake, the lower value of9.9 was inserted into the proposed rule and also put into page 20 ofthe

Agency’s original Exhibit F. The Agency believes that the appropriate inputs were n 6 and t =3

as shown above. Therefore, the chronic standard proposed for the Board adoption is 11 ~.tg(L.

IL IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURES

At this time, the

Agency has respectfully decided to not submit a draft proposal

for the application

of the dissolved metals water quality standards in pemlits (“implementation procedures”). This

decision will afford the

Agency

additional time to develop such procedures. Therefore, we will not

be complying with

the

HearingOfficer’s request for submission ofimplementationprocedures. The

Agency believes that it needs additional time to review the existing Board arid

Agency

rules to

identify the areas that are in need ofimplementation procedures. With the help ofa stakeholder

work group, the

Agency will

develop a draft proposal forthe Board or proceedto the first notice if

such procedures do not

require Board rulemaking. Ifthe internal review and the

work group

concludes that aparticular implementationprocedure belongs in the Board regulations, the Agency

will propose such rules

for the Board’s

adoption.

For

the permitting procedures,

the Agency intends to follow the procedures

outlined in

the USEPA

publications,

Technical Support Document For Water Quality Based Toxics Control, EPA/50512-

90-001 (March

1991),

and

The Metals Translator: Guidancefor Calculating A Total Recoverable

Permit Limit From A Dissolved Criterion,

EPA 823-8-96-007

Respeeffiully.Submitted

ILLINOIS ENV1RONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY

By:________________________

Sanjay K Sofat

Assistant Counsel

Division ofLegal Counsel

DATED: April 15, 2002

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

1021 North Grand Avenue East

P.O. Box 19276

Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276

(217)

782-5544

FRPR—15-2082 16:48     

217782988’?                   

2177829887

P.85

ILLINOIS. EPA

BOW

DWPC

MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT

FACILITY-RELATED STREAM SURVEY (FRSS) REPORT

A. Facility: Anna MWWTP

NPDES

Permit

27481

Exp.:

08/31/00

Cot~t~i:

Union.

________ ~

Po~ula~on:4)750

Tv~eof

facility:

minor municipal

BOW Reoion:.7

Survey date: 9/1/99

Report

date: October 30, 2000

Discharge ID: AD 181 03

Treatment level: activated sludge, sand filters

j~~:0.85 mgd or 1.3

cfs

Q~E:.1.65 mgd or 2.6

cfs

L~stma~grup~rade:12/1/98

C,SO’s: 0

Disinfection status: year-round exemption (since8/28/95)

Q~erationaIcondition of facility:

Agency

effluent data after

12198

indicated good operation, with some

inconsistency (in

part

due to

structural

problems with sand filters)

Effluent bioassay

data

available

April

1992

B. Receiving stream: Cache River (AD)

BasinJsj~b-basin:Ohio River ~A)/CacheRiver (AD)

USEPA

stream

reach: 05140206-030/on

ReceMncj

stream BSC:

Cache

RiverRM 0.0 to 52.6, C, 1992

Receiving

stream

7Q.1 0: 0 Stream

order Cache

River) 2 (at facility outfall) WBID:

ILAD

05 WBSEG: AD 05

Approx. discharge rates

during survey (09/01/99): (1) Cache River site

A-I,

0.1

cfs

or 0.06 mgd;

(2) MWWTP effluent, 0.8 cfs or 0.5 mgd; (3) Cache River site C-I. 0.9 cfs or 0.6 mgd.

Apprpx.

dilution ratio: 0.12:1

Other

cause_s

and

urces of impairment: urban

runoff

Previous

Illinois_EPA 

facility-related stream surveys

(mofy~)~:

04/14,08/84, 

05/92

Findings of previous lllinoks~PAsurveys downstream from the

Anna MWWTP:

The 1984 survey found that aquatic macroinvertebrate communities indicated

very

poor conditions in Cache

River downstream

from

the

Anna MWWTP.

The 1992 survey also ‘found very poor conditions in Cache River downstream from the Anna MWWTP.

Biological findings

ol

this

survey:

Aquatic macroinvertebratecommunities indicated good condition5 in

‘Cache

River, upstream (site A-i)

and

downstream

(sites

C-I ,C-2,

and

C4) from the

Anna

MWWTP (Table 2).

Fish were

observed

at sites A-i, C-I, C-2, and C-4. Schools of minnows (Cyprinidae) were observed at all four

of these sites. Topminnows (Fundulus) and mosquitofish (Gambusia) were observed at site C-2. Fish

communities were sampled at sites C-2 (AD-il)and

C-4

(AD-to). Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) values at sites

AD-il (44), AD-Ia (48). and AD-OS

(44)

Indicated good fish communities at those sites,

in

July and September

1999. (Table 3)

Biological data from samples collected at sites AD-I1,

AD-I

AD-OS,

and AD-OS, in 1999, indicated full support

of aquatic

life

use in the 17.2-mile stream reach of Cache River downstream from the city of

Anna (Table

13).

APR—15—2002 16:49

2177829807

2177829807  P.06

Figure 1. Sampling

locations

In Cache River, In the

vicinity

of Anna MWWTP, Union County. UIinoI~,

AUgUet 31 and September 1, 1999, and Januaty IS, 2000.

Tablet. Sampling

locations

in

Cache

River

(stream

code AD) and

types

of samples

collected

In the vicinity

Anna MWWTP,

NPDES

permit

27481, Union County. Illinois, August 31 and September

1.1999, 

and January 19,2000

Site

Code

UMS

Site

Code

Body

0~st

(mites)

Upeir

0’

OreS

Loc~tlo~

1/4

se~

Lathudo

•

Longitude

‘‘

Sample

T)r~~~

—T~$~$~

Stream

lope

order mile (RM)

Map

AI)-A1l-Al

Cache R

0.12

Walk ki

125

NEll

372847

891400

M,D.HW

54.9

2800

AD-AN-Si

AD-AN-Cl

Elffue~t

Cache

0.3

—

8tftuentat final

~z~k

Walk In

125

N~17

NEll

872854

372856

801406

891407

D.W

M,O.W

—

54.5

547

280B

2800

AD--Il AO-AN-CZ

CacheR

0.7

N-SUmekilnRd

125 1W

SWOO 372915

89 1550

M.F.D I-LW

64.1

2800

4D-,~It+C3 Cact,R

1.5

Wajkhabend

12$ 1W

NWO9

372953

891348

Ss~ 2800

AD—ia

A0.AN-C4

C.ache

1-9

Walk

uflfl 1n1

125

SWO4

373005

591340

M.F.D~H.W.S

52~9

2TiC

AD-.N4.C6 CacheR

2.2

0 WalkinOunn9lb

125 1W

3W04 373008

891323

52~8

VIC

AD-OS

cache

Rd. 0~S

rvi4 SW Saratoga

125 1W

SWO1

373016

891015

M.F.D.H.W

47.8

271C

Cache

16.0

Rd.

ofMt Pleaaant

12$ IE

3W14

372800 390437

M,P.D.H.W

58.5

280A

- Olstw,c.8001 Anna MWWTP ou~8(~a.emmiles)

Sam~Ie(ype

PA .. Macrci,Wedebates

0— Dlachacge Moaauramert

F—

F1~h

Commilnuly

W-W~tt,Chenulstiy

H - Habitat estknates ortansects

- Sediment Chemlaty

AD-OS (RM

47.8)

AD-OS

(RM 3e.B)~.

C—3

(AD-it)

pe3mNGLe ~X~T~0M

A-i’

Azu~oa~

(ac~5Io)

i~iPR—15—2~2 16:49    

21 778298~7

21778298~7 P.@7

Table 3. Fish community sampling

results

from Cache River sites in the vicinity of the Anna MWNTP, 1999

BIOS

‘

FISH SPECIES

Sito~

AD-Il

Scientific

Common.

Date~ 6l24I~2

911199

Cache 

Rjvor

‘

AD-OS

611192

81910w

AD-b

6124192

911199’

AD—06

1~11~7119199’

Code

Name

Method~,BP+SH

BP+SH

-S--

3008

Amia

calva

Bowlin

301 B

3020

3025

~scramericanus   

Grass

PIckerel

Campostoma anomalum

Central

Stoneroller

104

Cyprinu.2

CarpiO

Common

Carp

334

120

666

3052

3058

3061

3064

3069

3200

Nofropis

Iutionws

Red Shiner

Lythrunjs

umbratilis

Redfln Shiner’      

Cyprinelfa whipplsi

Steelcolor Shiner

Pimephales flotaliL9

Bluntnose Minnow

Setnolllusafrornaculatus

Creek

Chub

Suckers

Catostomidae

S

‘

11

205’

3073

3075

3081

3089

Calostomus commerscni

White

Sucker

Edmj~zon

oblongus

CreekChubsucker

Minytrema t~ieIsnops

Spotted Sucker

Aweiuru$ nat~1i~

Yellow Bullhead

13

3095

Noturusgyriflus

Tadpole Madtom    

3100

3105

Aphredoderussayanus

Pirate

Perch

Fundulus

notateas

Blackstripe

Topminnow

I

3106

Fandulus

oilvaceus

Blackspotted Topminruow

‘

3114

Can fra,vhus

macropterus

Flier

3116

3120

3121

3122

3125

3128

3127

3149

Lopomiscyanellus

Green Sunfish

Lepornis macrochtrus

Bluegill

Lepo,nismegalotis

Longear Sunfish

Lepomis

mcroiophus

Redear Sunfish

Micmpteiuepunctu(atus

Spotted

Sass

Miropterus salmoides

Largemouth Bass

Pomoxisannularis

White

Crappie

Perciria macolata

Bladcside

Darter

-1

129

-i

3157

CoItus carol!nae

Banded Sculpin.

Hybrid sunflsh’

NumberollndMduals;

167

553

190

1093

384

322

129

NumberotTaxa~

Index of Biotic Integrity (lBl)~

Method: BE—Boat Electrofishing, BP—Backpack

Electrofishing, ES—Electroselne, SH—Seine Haul

Hybrids

not

included

in number of taxa.

Partial sample 

(no

IBI value)

Ann#99fl5P0.w~

(04/17/00)

ciPR—15-28~2 16:49

2177829887

2177829807

P.08

Table 5. Field and laboratory water chemistry

from Cache

River (AD) .and an effluent

sample, in the vicinity of Anna

MWWTP, January 19, 2000.

TNTB code;

AD-li

AD~1O

AD-OS

STORET

FRSS code: AD-AN

AD-AN

AD-AN

CODE

Parameter

Site:

SW Saratoga

Sample

Time

800

830

845

930

1000

1030

1100

1300

Discharge (cis)

0.80

Discharge (mgd)

0.5

Air

Temp(SC)

-1

WaterTemp(C)

13.2

5.9

5.2

4.9

3.6

WaterTemp(’F)’

41.

4-I

400

(units)

7.9

6.9

7.6

7.8

7.9

8.1

ConductivIty

(pmhoslcm)

565

647

580

560

540

528

522

460

299

DIss

Oxygen

(mgII)       

113

9.0

10.9

11.2

11.0

11.4

11.1

12.3

301

Diss Oxygen

Saturation

80082

BOD Carb

(mg/I)

1 K

I K

- -

310

BOD Total

(mg/I)

- -

580

1. OrganIc Carbon

(mg/I)

5.3

2.7’

2.4

2.5

2.4

3.4

530

Susp Solids (mg/I)

610

NH3+NH4 N (mg/I)

0.14

0.01 K

0.06

0.01 K

612 Un-ion

Ammonia N (mg/I)’  

0.002  

0.001 1  0.001 K 

0.001 K 

0.001

K 0.001 K

0.001

0.001 K

630

N02+N03

N(rTig/l)

1.7

4.6

3.5

3.5

3.8

665

Phosphorus Tot (mg/I)

0.09

4.6

0.84

0.58

0.65

0.73

0.76

0.75

900

Hardness(mg/I)’

234

168

222

224

215

212

206

185

916

CalcIum Tot(mg/I)

‘

927

‘

Magnesium Tot

(mg/i)

929

937

Sodium Tot (mg/f)

Potassium Tot (mg/i)

2.2

3.2

2.8

3.0

3.5

3.8

1105

Aluminum Tot (pg/I)

400

100 K

470

550

760

550

850

220

1007

Barium

Tot

(pg/i)

64.

1012

Beryllium

Tot

(pgll)

1 K

I K

1 K

I K

1 K

1022

Boron Tot 

(pg/I)

280

1027

CadmiumTot

(pg/I)

3 K

3 1

3 K

034

Chromium

Tot(pg/I)

5 K

1037

CobaltTot(ii,g/I)

10 K

1042

CopperTot (pg/I)

10 K

10 J(

10 K

1045

Iron

Tot (pg/I)

450

520

630

840

740

930

350

1051

Lead

Tot(pgIl)

50 K

50-K

5 K

50 K

5 K

‘1055 Manganese Tot 

(pg/I)

15 K

1067

1077

Nickel

Tot (pg/I)

Silver Tot (pg/f)

25 K

‘

25 K

‘3 K

25K

25 K

‘

25 K

1082

Strontium Tot (pg/I)

4900

170

4000

4300

3800

3400

3100

880

1087

VanadiumTot(pg/I)

5 K

5 K

1092

ZincTot(pgfl)

100 K

71900

Mercury (pg/I)

0,10 K

0.10 K

0:01 K

0.10 K

0.01 K

0.10 K

0.01

‘

Calculated

Estimated

- Less than stated detection limit

F~PR—15—2002 16:49

2177829807

P.89

Table 7.

Illinois

EPA effluent sampling results

from 

Anna municipal wastewater

treatment

plant, NPDES permIt 27481, 1995-1999. (All

units

are mg/I, except as noted.)

Water

Temp

403

Lab

610

Ammonia

612

Un-ionized

310

Total

80082 -—

Carb

530 -

Susp

Date

Time

(‘C)

(‘F) (units)

Ammonia

as N

BOD

BOO

Solids

95(01131

930

7.8

1.2

0.007

95/02121

830

7.8

0.61

95104/05

845

7.5

1.4

0.009

95/05/15

915

7.7 -

0.80

0.013

95/06/13

900

20.

7.5

0.96

0.012

, 13

95107(06

830

- 7.8

0.35

0.011

95/08(08

~i5

25

7.6

2.7

0.060

95/09120

1330

7.3

1,6

0.013

95(10(15

900

7.3

1.4

0.007

9

95/11(08

845

7.4

4.0

0.019

95/12111

-103

7.8 .

0.156

96/01/23

815

7.6

3.4

•

0.027

96/02/14-15

800

7.8

0.095

-9~/04/10

. 900

7.7

4.4

0.041

96/05/01

845

7.8

0.46.

0.008

96106/11

900

7.8

0.40

0.010

96/07~31

845

1.7

1.4

0.031

96/00/20

26

79

7.5

2.1

0.042

96/09(17

830

7.8

0.155 •

96/10/21

1030

7.8

2.7

0.034

96/11/18

7.9

4.2

96/12/03    

845

7.9

2.3

0.036

97/02106

815

7-9

3.6

0,045

97703/04

830

7.7

0.80

0.006

33-

97104/01

900

7.9

1.0

0.015

97106116

830

7.5

2.5

97/07/09

845

7.6

2.7

0.051

97108125

900

7.7

8.6

0.159

97/10126

7.1

8.5

0.105

•

97112(22

7.8

6.7

•

98101120

7.9

98/03/30

915

7.2

0,07

98/04/21

930

7.1

0.49

98/06/11

800

.22

7.0

0.26

98/07/09

815

7.3

4.1

98/08/19

845

7.2

0.42

98/09/22

- (no dlscI~arge)

98/11/05     

815

19

65

7.5

0.23              

2

2

98/12/08    

800

17

63

7.2

0.18              

2

0.057

0.001 K

0.002

0.001

0.043

0.004

99/01/26

99/02/23

99/03/02

99/05/18

99/06/16

99/07/14

99/08/31

99/09/01’

99/09/28

99/10/26

99/11/16-17

99/11/23

99/12/28

7.1

7.3

7.6

7.4

7.3

1100

25.3

6$’

1.5

7.2

7.3

7.2

7.3

6_9 *

0.33

0.27

0.14

0.97

1.2

0.40

0.26

0.65

6.3

0.83

0.01 K

0.25

0.01 K

00I K

0.003

0.001

0.001 -

0.001

0.010

0.006

0.004

0.003

0.102

0.004

0.001

0.001 K

2000/01/19

830

13.2

0.001 K

8.

K— Less than stated detection level

Average:

16.2

61.2

7.5

2.8

0.031

12.2

19.7

Minimum:

39.2

1101

0.001 K

I K

Maximum~

7.9

22.0

0.159

NPIJt~permit limits:

(8/28/95.8/31/0)

• Field

Apr-Oct

Nov-Mar

Ammonia

mean

m~n

(~O~Inv,J1~

F~PIR—15—2002 15:50    

2177829807

P.10

Table 10. Concentrations of metals, nutrients, and organochiorine compounds

in sieved (63 microns) stream sediment samples from Cache River,

downstream from Anna, 1992 and 1999.

Site:

AD-Il

AD-lO

AD-06

STORET

River Mile:

CODE

Parameter

Date:

54.1

1011192

52.9

- -

911199

41.8

611192

7119199

Metals

and Nutrients (mg/kg,

dry

weight)

339

Chemical Oxygen Demand

37200

15400

- -

70322

Solids, Volatile ()

4.2

3.1

2.8

2.9

627

Kjeldahl Nitrogen

1060

1100

721

1618-

668

Phosphorus

900

578

443

452

938 Potassium

1000 K

710

1000 K  

530

1003

Arsenic

4.7

1 K

5.6

3.5

100$

Barium

113

102

64-

1028

Cadmium

0.3 K

1029

Chromium

9.6

7.0

1043

Copper

6.0

1052

Lead

8.9

1053

Manganese

~j~1

690

370

1068 Nickel                  

14

8.2

13

7.2

1078 Silver                    

2

0.32       

0.5 K

1093

Zinc                 

106

1170

Iron

15000

42

8200

14000

24

7700

71921

Mercury

0.10    

0.10 K   

0.10 K  

0.10 1

Organochiorine compounds (pglkg,

dry

weight)

39519

Total

PCR’s

10 K  

10 K 

•~

10 K

39333 - AIdrin

I K

39383

Dieldrin 

I K

39301

p,p’DOT

I K

10 K

1 K

39311 p,p’DDD             

11

1.5

1

K

I K

39321 p,p’DDE

6.7

1.2

1 K.      

1 K

39359

TotalDOT

10 K

I K

39064

Chlordane, cis isomer (alpha)

2 K

39067

Chlordane, trans isomer (gamma)

-2 K

2 K

39351

Total alpha

& gamma Chiordane I

281

5 K

39393

Endrin

I K

1 K

I K

I 1

39461

Methoxychlor

5 K

5 K

39076

Alpha

BHC

I K

39343

Gamma BHC(Lfndane)

I K

39701

Hexaohlorobenzene

I K

39413

Heptachior

I K

39423

l-Ieptachlorepoxide

I K

81618

Trifluralin

10 K

- -

39631

Atrazine

- -

50 K

81407

Alachlor

- -

10 K

- -

10 K

81409

Metribuzin

- -

10 K

38923

Metolachtor

- -

25 K

- -

25 K

82409

Pendlmethatin

- -

10 K

- -

10 K

49196

Captan

- -

10 K

- -

82543

Cyanazine (Biadex)

- -

25 K

•-

25 K

-- Less than stated detection level

- -

Not analyzed for

Nalues that are

shaded are elevated, and values

that are outlined are highly elevated, based on

Short1 I~971

FRPR—15-2~02 15:5w

21778298~7

21778298I~7

P.11

Table 12. Illinois EPA habitat data for Cache River sampling sites

the vicinity of Anna,

1999.

INTB code:

AD-Il

AD-b

AD-O6

FRSS’code:

AD-AN-Al

AD-AN-Cl

AD-AN-C2

AD-AN.C4

Habitat Parameter

Date:

Aug 31, 99

sept.~~eo

Aug 31,99

Sept.i, 99

Jul 19,99

425

605

543

400

800

540

1.1

222

118

106

117

3.4

3.8

58.1

2.5

2.8

10.2

11.3

12.8

18.6

16.1

12.0

18.6

31.1

4.3

11.0

12.3

1.7

8.5

7.6

6.8

1.9

1.7

6.6

11.9

3.4

2.8

9.3

2.8

000

0.9

SAMPLING 

REACH

Station Length

Fish (ft)

- -

T. Transect Reach -

Habitat (It)

200

No. Habitat Transects

Transect Interval (ft)

- -

Incrempnt VVldth (tt)

1. No. Habitat Samp’e Points

T. No. Velocity Measurements

T. No. Channel Width Measurements

- -

SUBSTRATE

()

Silt

Mud (-cO.063 mm).

Sand

(0.063

2 mm)

14 J

Fine Gravel (0.08 0.3 inches)

10 J

Medium Gravel (0.2

0.6 inches)

15 J

Coars~Gravel

(06

2.5 inches)

a J

15 j

Small Cobble (2.5-5

Inches)

4 J

Large Cobble (5- 10

inches)                

2 J

14 J

Boulder

(~- 10 inches)

I J

-1

Bedrock

10 J

4 J

Claypan

Compacted Soil

14 J

Plant Detritus

14 J

Vegetation

3 J

2 J

Submerged Logs,

0 J

Other

- o~

HYDRAULIC

FEATURES.

StreamOrder -

. -

Discharge (cfs)

cii

1.9

1.2

0.6

1.8

Mean

Channel Width (It)

- -

Mean Width ofWater (It)

225

20.2

22.3

Mean Velocity ~ Q (discharge)

0.63

0.2 J

0.65

0.75

0.83

Mean

Velocity (cts/wd)

0.08

020

0.06

0.07

0.06

Mean

Depth (It)

0.3

0.8 J

0.4

1.3

Mean Depth at Thalweg (It)

Mean

Width!

Mean Thaiweg Depth

1.8

12.5

0.9

22.4

2.0

11-2

Water Level

Normal

Normal

Water

Level Trend

Stable

Stable

Pool

40 J

51.7

316

35.4

Riffle

Run

40 J

1~2

31.9

14.6

46.8

7.0

46.9

Slack

OTHER

- -

1.2

10.8

Shading

()

lnstream Cover Total ()

- -

8.21

8.68

7.1

Boulders

- -

1.98

3.37

1.26

Undercut

bank

- -

1 J

2.58

1.47

1.74

RoclclClayLedge

1 J

0.77

1.16

1.10

Submerged

tree roots

1 J

1.81

1.51

1.01

Brush-debris

jams

t J

0.00

0.43

0.24

Logs

0.60

0.56

1.18

Aquatic

Vegetation

- -

0.27

Submerged Terrestrial Vegetation

- -

0.18

0.06

0.51

Other (trash)

- -

0~02

0.02

Potential

Index of Blotic

lnte~~y

(PIBfl

39.8

41.0

42.5

42.8

36.3

—

Estimated

IiPR—15-2~02 16:5w

2177B298~7

21??8298~7

P.12

~ (_V

f/I(.

ILLINOIS IEPA

- BOW - DWPC - MONITORING AND -ASSESSMENT

FACILITY-RELATED

STREAM

SURVEY

REPORT

Facility: Urbana-Champaign SD SW

NPDES

Permit: 00315-26~

Exp: 09/30/98

County:

Champaign

Location:

Urbana-Champaign -

Population: 63,502

(Champaign)

BOW Region:

Survey Date: 08/12/97

Report

Date: 02/21198

Discharge 1D: 0 01902

Treatment 

Level: Sedimentation, activated sludge. and rapid sand filtration with excess flow

treatment * nitrification/denitrificatión and_phqsphorus removal; Sludge treatment consists of

aerobic digestion, belt filtration, floatation thickening_and land application.

Disinfection Status; Year-Round

DAF/Max (mgd): 5.90/1 2.50

CSO’S:

Last Major Upgrade (year): 1982

Operational condition of facility (from DWPC records, operator’s comments, and/or

observations):

Violations of permit

limits

over

last year (from

DRMRs and FOS monitoring):

summary

of IEPA

effluent monitoring_data is included as Table 3.

Effluent

bioassay data available? YesX

No~

WBID: 1L013.

Receiving Stream:

Copper Sloug~

Basinlsub-basin: K-askaskia River

USEPA stream Reach:

071402_Ol

Receiving Stream BSC/year: C

1986

BSC Other/year:

—

Receiving Stream 7Q10: ~Q

Stream Order:

Discharge of Receiving Stream downstream from

WWTP

outfall, during survey:

Discharge at station Cl was measured at 21.10 cfs on 

the

day

of the survey.

Discharge of Facility at outfall: .4.52 mgd (daily averag~ior

O8I1.2/97)~

(Facility flow meter..&.. or 

IEPA measurement_)

Est. dilution ratio during survey:

Other Potential Sources 

Impairment Urban runoff 

/ Development

Previous Surveys (years): FRSS (1980.

19~3.1987, 1992)

Findings of previous surveys; Data

from the 1992 FRSS survey did not indicate any

impact

Copper Slough in the vicinity of Urbapa/Champajgn SW STP. There were no

violations to state general use water quality standards at that time.           

~PR—15-2002 16:50

2177829807

2177829807

P.13

C. Biological Findings

of this survey: Based on cal~u1atedMB1 scores, overall stream

quality was good within Copper Slouah and Kaskaskia Ditch in

the

vicinity_of

Urbana/Champaign

SW STP.

No appaçent 

.irn~actwas

observed within Copper SIoi~h

downstream from the outfall during this su~ey.._

Water quality findings of this survey: There

was no indication of malor water quality

problems and no aeneral use water Quality violations were identified during this~surv~y,,

Recreational use,

actual or

potential:

Conclusions:

1.  Based on MB! scores, overall siream guaIi~was good. No 

a~~arent

imD~ct

was

observed to the bioloolcal communities within the receiving streams.

2. There were no indication of malor water auality

problems and no general use

water quality

violations were lientified.

Recommendations:

I-I.

Monitoring and assessment

staff

who worked on this survey.

Jim Hefley

Mark Joseph

Don Jarrett (intern)

fi~f~rm/3-16-98

Figure 1. Stations sampled on streams in the vicinity of Urbana/Champaign SW STP,

F\)

:~3

-Lt~JI~JL~1v’~”

~r&’ii~~

co

August 12,

1997.

-u

~,~\lL~’

/fr~~~

I-~

~_~ ~.

4~:~

I

----~-~2

~—~—

/~,

Ia. ~°

..‘_____

/

(

I

‘t

~--j

~.i

~K’111J4~.~4~

!C(~-~4~J.(

~L1’?~)

0.2

~0.4 ~

0.8

~~1~Miles

705

c~\JSCA~~E~CALE3I

;~_~

F1PR—15—2002 16:51

2177829807

P.15

Table

Macroinvertebrate data

collected

during the UrbanaIChampaign SW FRSS.

August 12,

1997.

STATION

TAXON

TOLERANCE

RATiNG

Al Cl

C2 C5

Plecoptera

OIigoneuriid~e

Corydalidae

Calopterygidae

T~ichoptera(Non-Hydropsychidse)

Heptsgenhidae

Sialidae

Amphipoda

Baetidae

Potamarithidae

Tipulidse

Cyrenidae

(Corbicula

fIuminae)

Anisoptera

Ephemeridae

Cambaridae

Ceratopogorudae

Elmidae or Dryopidae

Sphaeriidae

Caenidae or Tricorythidae

Coenagrionidae

Hydropsychidse

Asellidae

Chironomidae (Non-Chironomus)

SImullidse

Turbeltaria

Other Gastropoda

Planorbidae

Scirtidae (larvae

only)

Lyrnnaeidae

Ancylidae

(Femssia

sp.)

Tabanidae

Culicidae

Hirudinea

Physidae

Oligochaeta

Red Chironomidae (blood midge)

5.0

5.5

5.5

6.0

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.0

7.0

8.0

8.0

9.0

7

10.0

11.0

41

434

6

1.5

3.0

3.0

3-5

3.5

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.0

5.0

4

3

140 129 176

5.1

4.7 5.2

TOTAL ABUNDANCE

TAXA

RICHNESS

MBI

52

1-1

4.6

31

93

5.2

RPR—15-2002 16:51

2177829807

P.16

Table 2. Water Chemistry

results from

Copper Slough In the vicinity of

the

Champaign SW STP,

August12. 1997.

PARAMETER

GENERAL USE

STANDARD

State Water Quality Standard Violation

— Calculated value

~ Standards are hardness dependent acute standards

are

eridosed

in parenthesis.

(a)

Total ammonia 

nilmgen shall not exceed 15.0

mglL~Unionized ammonia shall not exceed 0.33 mg/I (acute)-

or 0057

(thronic average) diailng summer months.

(b) Effluent standards apply

daily maximum concentratIons,

Field Water Temp.,

Deg. C.

Field

pl-l,

units

Field Dissolved Oxygen, mg/I

Field Conductivity, umhos/cni

Ammonis Nitrogen, mg/I

Unionized Ammonia, mg/I

Nitrate + Nittlte-N, mgiI

Total Phosphorus, mg/I

BOD,rng/I

BOb c.arb (Inh.), mg/I

TOC (carbon, total or9anic)

Total Suap. Solids. mg/I

Feral

Coliform

T. Mercury. ugIl

mg/I

65—8.0

5.0 mm

15.0(a)

03310.057(a)

0.5 ugh

21.1

7.9

5.6

302

034

0.012

0.82

0.06

3

6.2

3900

0.1

2t0

7.5

8.1

584

0.17

0-002

6.3

0.59 -

3

6.8

3700

0.1

21.0

3.1

7.7

451

0.38

0.020

3.4

0.29

2700

0.1

22.8

8.1

7.8

431

0.49

0.030

3.4

0.23

7.1

3500

0.1

21.5

8.3

8.8

458

0.47

0040

2.3

0.15

5.5

1500

0.1

17.3

10.2

~

0.88

0.056

0.34

0.04

3.6

1100

T. Calcium.

mg/I

T. Magnesium,

mg/I

T. Sodium,

mg/I

T. Potassium, mg/I

T.Aluminum,ugIl

T.Barlum,ugil

T. Boron,

ugh

5000

ugh

1000 ugh

440

180

9.5

110

650

5,9

270

430

5.3

190

380

4.3

170

440

2.1

100

210

550

T. Beryllium.

ugh

1. Cadmium,

ugh

(11.5)3

(13.6)3

(13.3)’3

(18i)3

(27.8)3

T. Chromium.

ugh!

‘5

1. Copper, ugh

(20.4).clO

(23Mc-io

(23.0)l0

(29.7)10

(425)1 0

T.Cobaitughl

Tlrorr,ughI

620

290

200

10.

200

100

T. Lead. ugh!

‘

(98.6)’SO

(100)c50

(l00)50

(100)50

T.Mangariese,ugll

1000 ugh

T. Nickel, ugh

1000 ugll

‘25

T. Silver.

ugh

5.0

ugfl

‘3

. 3

1. Strontium,

ugh!

120

140

130

220

400

T. Vanadium, ugh!

‘5

‘s

5

1. Zinc,

ugh

l000ughI

100

‘100

- Hardness. mg/I

116

143

134

132

173

253

RPR—15-2~2 16:52

2177829807

P.17

Table 3. STORET generated summary of IEPA effluent monltonng data collected between

August 20, 1993 and June 19, 1997

for the (JrbanalChampaign SW STP.

IW~TIAL

DATE

93/08/20 93/10/Q5 93/12/05 94101/21 94/03/25 94/04/7’, 

94/0612.7

94/09/02 

94/2.0/22..

5521’IAI. 5584!

2.100

1100

1134

1030

1040

1418

5135

2.030    

2040

co~si~caoR TIME.ST~TEsTIcsL

cd-v-

cs-v-

co-v.

c;-v-

co-v-

co—v-

ez’.v-

co-y-

MED~UN

WATER

WAlKS

WAlES

WATER

MATES

WATER

W).O15

DEPTR-FTISNK)

• 5

98932.

DATSIOME)

93/05/20 95/80/09 93/2.2/01 94/02.121 94/02/29

94/04/27 94/04/17 94/09(02 

04(10~21

PIOD.L TIME.NUMGER OF

SAMPLES

1100 SC 12.00 SC 12.34 SC

2.030 

SC 1040 SC 2.42.5 SC 1115

SC 1030

SC 2.040

2275

1

00403  911     

2.53

5.2

0.4

8.4

77

03

0.4

8.2

6.2.

30930 929300!

709

WBTT

MG/I.

1

4

2

90610 955.11114- 70

TOTAL.  

MG/I.

.02.05

.070

.0105

.LS00

.260

.070

a3o

.110

.340.

00665

P505-TOT

HG/T.

.200   

.290   

.2511     

440

.400   

260

.22.0

.570

.160

14041 1109

SAMOL!

OTDAT~

950420

990420

950420

980420

850420

950420

950420

930470

950420

60008 500

bC 502.7 C2.R  MG/I.        

1.0K  

2.0

1.0K  

2.0

2.0

2..0K   

1.01    

3~0

2.05

8581233.

DAIS

94/3.1/23

92/01/27 95/03/03 95/05/2.9 95/07/24 95/12./2.7 96/03/01 96/04/26

96/08/07

INITiAL TIME

1149

1015

2.050    

0935

1100

0936

1100

1139

1015

OP-SPACE Cr0 ‘rTNZ-STATISTIOAL CCXC

CP-V-

CO’.~P-

CP.V-

C2.V.

~p.Y..

~9V

Cp-V..

CP-V-

C9-V-

14691CM

WATER

872.755

WATER

95775-97(5145)

£2933.

09.75(0145)

9412.3.123 95/02/27

95/05/03 59/09/iS 96/07/24 99/U/i?

94/03/01 94/04/26

86(06/01

21521

TIME-NUMBER

OF SM(PLES

1149 SC 1025 SC 2.050 SC 0935 SC 1100 SC 0935 SC 2.100

SC 2.139 SC 1013

PIPE

00403

LAS

397

0.4

8.3

8.0

8.1

8.3

00550

9551005

TOT NFr.T

MC/T..

12.

00610 553.8754- 87 TOTAL.

MG/L

.070

.2.40

.470

.010

.240

.030

.140

.0101

.02.05

0o663

P503-TO?

oss/3. 9

.130   

.090   

.840

.2.60

.360

.460

.350

.730

14041 WQP

5324L0

JPOAISD

950420

550420

960208

940221

960723.  

960509

960717

940117

562.029

60082 POD

8CC 5057 C8&

MG/I.

1.0

2.0

7.0

3.0

1.0

2111552.L

DATE

94/07/24 96/09/06 96/10/15

56/tUGS

56/2.2/26 9C/12/iO 97/01/Si 97/01/il

51/05/24

2873787.0. TIME

202.5

0919

1015

11115

1500

2.300

1100

2.100

1045

CP..OPACE OR

TIME-NIATISTICAL. 90MG

CO-I-

CP-V-

cp-v-

ce-v-

cr-v-

cp-v-

CL’-V-

C9-V-

CA-V.

55010287

WATER

YASiR

WATER

879455

WATER

55759(

Dspm-FrCsNK)

228721 DATB(0557

95/07/85 96/09/06 96/10/18 96/11/08 96/12/55

96/2.2/2.8 97/01/52. 97/02/51

97/03/24

P~05LTmS-NVMSER

OP 303198.23

1015 SC 0935 SC 1015 SC 1015 30

1600 SC 2.500 SC 2100 SC 12.00 SC 1043 SC

8585

00433

L).S

6.3

7.9

6.4

8.4

8.2

8.3

83

00330 2538005

705 N?L?

NU/L

3.2

0062.0

.7054. 98 50792.

(40/I.

.0105

1300

.040   

.080

.310

.340

.040

~C4fl

~130

00664

PaDS—TOT

MG/I. 7

.2.57

.270

.470

.350

.369

.560

.550

.980

74041 “~P.

59,9177.5

UPDATED

970314

970514

91Q53.4  

970524

970713

971024

97012.5  

972.024  

971024

50082

500

200 SOAP 02.9.   

MG/I. 

1.0

4.0

2.0

3.0

2.0

3.0

INITIAL

PATS

97/06/3.5

IOLITIAL ‘rIME

1210

OR TIME-STATISTICSJ. OOJEC

C5-V-

WATER

DEP8E-FT(SMK)

£2705.

0573(0MW)

97/06/15

P5501.

?1R-NU~2R

09 301498.23

1210 SC

PIPE

00403

LAS

5.5

60530 5552005

70T NFL.T

MG/I.

0343.0 553.9394. 98 70151.

140/I.

.050

74041

WQF

SNIPLE

UPDATED

971024

00002 900 ICC 5021 022.

940/7.

2.550957 95IWLIRYAL DATE

98/03/24

FRPR—15—2002 16:52

2177829807

P.18

Table

Summary

of habitat characteristics

for streams in the vicinity of the

UrbanalChampaign SW STP, August 12, 1997.

All values are field

estimates.

1-(ab!tat

Parameter

Stream Width (ft) 

20

20

25

12

Stream Depth (ft) @ Q

0.7

0.9

1 2

Pool()               

0

0

5

0

0

Riftle()

Ruri()

100

Shading()

BUt/Mud()

Sand()

2

2

10

Fine Gravel ()

10

25

20

Medium Gravel ()

Coarse Gravel ()

Small Cobble ()

Large Cobble ()

Boulder()

Bedrock

()

Claypan ()

Plant Detritus ()

Vegetation()

Submerged Logs ()

0 -

Other()

I~PR—15-2o02 16:52

2177829807

P.19

Table 5~.Location of stations sampled during the Urbana/Champaign SW FRSS, 1997.

Station

OZYA-CH-A1

OZYA-CH-E1

OZYA-CI-1-C1

OZYA-CH-C2

OZY-CH-C5

OZY-CH-D2

Description

Copper slough, approximately 100 yards upstream from the point of

discharge; Champaign County; T19N~R8E. SWZO;

40 05’05” /88

19’44”

Urbana/Champaign SW sewage treatment

plant effluent;

Champaign County; TI9N, R8E. SW2O;

40 05’02” /88 1 9’57”

Copper Slough, approximately 100 yards downstream from the point of

discharge; champaign County; 119N, RBE, SEI9;

40 05~02”/88 2003”

Copper Slough, approximately 0.28 mile downstream from the point of

discharge; Champaign County; TI9N, R8E, SEI9;

40 05’02” /88 20’16”

Kaskaskia Ditch, approximately 1.5 miles downstream from the point of

discharge; 

Champaign County; TI

9N, R8E, SW3O;

40 04’12” /88 

20’44”

Kaskaskia Ditch, aproximately 0.6 mile upstream from the confluence 

with

Copper Slough; Champaign County; 

TI9N, R8E, SWI9;

40 05’02” /88

20’53”

IRPR—15-2002 16:52

2177829807

I ~

P.20

ILLINOIS

IEPA

BOW

DWPC

- MONITORING

AND

ASSESSMENT

FACILITY-RELATED STREAM SURVEY REPORT

Facility: Clinton

STP

NPDES

Permit: 0023612

Exp: 09/30/00

County: Dewitt

Location: Clinton, DL

Population: 7,437

BOW Region: ~

Survey Date:

08118197

Report Date: 04/07/98

Discharge ID: ElI 03901

Treatment Level: IMHOFF and activated_sIudg~followed by rapid sand filtration

Disinfection Exemption Status: Year-Round

DAF/Max (mgd):

.68/4.2Q

Permitted CSO’S: Yes

Last Major Upgrade (year): 1988

Operational condition offacility (from DWPC records, operator’s comments, andlor

observations):

Violations of permit limits over last year (from DRMRs and FOS monitoring): A summary

of LEPA.effltLent

monitorinQcLataiS

included as Table 3.

Effluent bioassay data available? Yes

WBID: ILEIIOI.

Receiving Stream: Coon Creek

Basin/sub-basin: Sangamon River / Salt Creek

USEPA stream Reach: 07130009

Receiving Stream BSCIyear: C -1982_

BSC Other/year: —

Receiving Stream 7Q10:

Stream Order:

i...

Discharge of R~ceivingStream downstream from WWTP outfall, dunng survey:

5.93 cfs at Cl

Discharge of Facility at outfall:

0.89

rngd. as a monthly average_for 

August 1 99L

(Facility flow meter~.~or IEPA measurement

Eat. dilution

ratio, during survey:

Other Potential Sources of Impairment: CSO discharges. urban runoff and non-~~t

sources.

Previous Surveys (years): FRSS (1975, 1979. 1981. 1985. 1989)

Data is also available for C3 from a 1997 intensive_survey on the Salt Creek basin.

Findings of previous

surveys: 

Maoroirwertebrate data from the

1989

survey indicated

mo~ierate

impairment to. Coon Creek upstream from the STP and slight to m~erate

impairment to background

sites 

on Ten Mile Creek. State general use water quality

standards were

exceeded for cooner. dissoived_oxy~en.iron, and silver

Figure 1. Location of stations sampled on Coon Creek in the vicinity

Clinton STP, 1997.

j_jf-’

‘s

(

ru.1~(

~-,~“-

1.-.

I—

0.5

~1::.~~

1 Mites

-U

r’J

I-~

Table 2. Water chemistry results

from

samples collected during the Clinton FRSS,

August 19,1997.

PARAMETER

GENERAL USE

STAN DARD

* State Water Quality Standard VidtaUon

‘~ Calculated value

Standards are hardness dependent; acute standards are enclosed in parenihesis.

(a) Total ammonia

ni(togen

shall not

exceed 15.0 mg)L; Unionized ammonia shall aol exceed 0.33 mg/I (acute)

or 0.057 (chronic average) during summer months,

FieldWalerlemp..Oeg.C.

20.2   

21.3    

20.8     

20.9    

21.3

Field pH, 

units

6.5.9.0

7.5

7.3

7.5

7,9

5.0

Field Dissolved Oxygen, mg/I     

5.0 mm       

4.9

6.6

5.4

7.8

Field CortduclM(y, umhoslcm

561

1267

856

770

- 692

Aninionia Nilrogen,

mg/I

15(a)

0.33

0.14

0.24

0.18

0.12

UnFoni~edAmmonia,mg/I

0.33~L067(a)

0.004

0.001

0.003

0.006

0.005

Nilate+

Nitrite, mg/I

2.1

6.5

3.7

3.3

Total

Phosphorus,

mg/I

0.29

0.95

0.56

0.54

BOD1mg/I

SOD oarb (lnh.),

mg/I

TOC

(carbon, total organic)

mg/I

5.3

6.2

6.0

4.9

5.0

TotalSusp.SolIds,mgfl

Fecal

Collfomi,

col/lOOmI

6200

•

8400

9100

6700

7200

Mercury,

ugh

0.5 ~

0.10

0.10

0.10   

0.10

Calcium, mg/I

-59

T. Magnesium. mg/I

1. Sodium. mg/I

150

1’. Potassium,

mg/I

3.6

6.4

4.9

4.4

T.Aluminum,ug/I

620

100

660

840

760

T. Barium, ugh

5000 ug!J

120

190

160

120

100

Boron, ugh

1000 ugh

150

480

300

270

220

1. BeryFliuui-i ugh

‘ci

1. CadmIum, ugh

‘~

(26.0).3

(32.0)3

(25.9)3

(21 .8)’3

1.Chromium,ugh

5

5

(5

T. Copper, ughi

“

(40,3)13

(47.9)22

(40.1)17

(34.7)14

1. Cobalt, ugh

‘10

T.Iron,ug/I

1300

1100

1200

1000

T. Lead, ughi

(100)’cSO

‘50

(100)50

(l00)c50

(100)c50

1. Manganese, ugh

l000ug/l

140

130

110

T. Nickel, ugh

1000 ugh

‘26

1. Silver) ugh).

5.0 ugh

‘3

1. Strontium, ugh

130

230

190

160

150

T. Vanadium, ugh

‘5

ZAnc,ughl

l000ughI

100

360

140

100

‘~ Hardness, mg/I

239

322

287

238

204

I-,

a.,

c-n

-U

F’)

I~PR—15-2002 1654

2177829807

P.23

Table 4. Summary of habitat characteristics for stations sampled during the

Clinton FRSS,

August

18, 1997.

Habitat Parameter

* Stream Width (ft) c~

• Stream Depth (ft) ~ Q

0.79

0.71

Mean Velocity

(tt/s) ©

0.35 .

0.5

Discharge (cfs) ~

2.64

5.93

Pool()

Riffle()

Run ()

Shading()

Silt/Mud ()

‘2

Sand()

FineGravel()

Medium Gravel ()

Coarse

Gravel ()

Small

Cobble

()

Large Cobble ()

0

Boulder()

Bedrock()

Claypan()

Plant

Detritus 

()

Vegetation ()

Submerged Logs ()

Other () Cement debris

* Denotes measured parameters; all others are estimates.

IRPR—15-2002 16:54

2177829807

P.24

STATE OF ILLINOIS

COUNTY OF SANGAMON

)

PROOF OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, on oath state that I have served the attached

AGENCY’S COMMENTS

upon the persoii to whom it is directed, by placing a copy in an envelope addressed to:

Dorothy Gunn, Clerk

Pollution Control Board

100 West Randolph Street

Suite 11-500

Chicago, Illinois 60601

(FIRST

CLASS MAIL)

Mathew Dunn

Illinois Attorney General’s Office

Environmental Control Division

James

Thompson Center

100 West Randolph Street

Cbicago, Illinois 60601

(FIRST CLASS MAIL)

Attached Service List

(FIRST CLASS MAIL)

Made E. Tipsord

Illinois Pollution Control Board

James

Thompson Center

100 West Randolph Street, Suite 11-500

Chicago, Illinois 60601

(FIRST

CLASS

MAIL)

Legal Service

Illinois Department ofNatural Resources

524 South Second Street

Springfield, Illinois 62701-1787

(FIRST CLASS

MAIL)

and mailing it from Springfield, Illinois on April 15, 2002, with sufficient postage affixed as

indicated above.

OFFICIAL SEAL

BRENDA BOEHNER

NOTARY PU6UCI

STATE OF ILLINOIS

~MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 

~‘l-~$2005~

c~72id

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN

BEFORE ME

this day ofApril 15, 2002.

AQ$~J~

Notary Public

3c~\i~(

THIS PILINC

PIUNTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

I~PR—15—2002 16:54    

2177829807

P.25

Matthew Dunn

Cbief,

Envi~on~ntalBureau

Officeof the AttorneyGeneral

188 West Randolph Suect, 20th~1oor

Chioago. fllinoic 60601-3218

Lany Cox

Downcr’a Grnve Sry~istnct

2710Cur~ssStreet

Downcr’aGrovc~funds

60515

AlbertBct5nger

Eevñ~eaneotalLaw and Pol

icy

Center

35 PastWacket Driv8, Suite 1300

Cbicago~Illinois 60601-2110

~a~e1d

Depestianitof?ublfr Worica City ofJo1ic~

921 EaatWashington Su~ct

~oliee,

I1linoi~ 604~3

Lisa Frcdc

cernicalluduafty Council

9801 WestHigjis Road, Suite 515

Roseniont,Illinois 60018

boruthyGuem

illinois PollioionConttoL?.c’aid

100 WettRandolph $~eet,Suite

11-500

Chicago. illinois 60601

Jaur.s

H~rrington

Roes & Hard~cs

350

NorthMichigan, Suite

2500

Chicago, Illinois 60601

Ron Hill

2I:bLC~OW:NI.fOr

Mc~opo1itanWaterReebroationDis~ictofChicago

6001West Pershing Road

Cicero, Xu1i~ois

60804.4112

21:DLC:uOW:NL,

Ibe $6

aththie Hedge

HodZe, Dwyer and Zcmnn

3150 RolandAvenue,

Post

Office Box

5776

Spi-frtgtield, illinois

62705.5776

MssgareiHowaid

Hedinger and X1ow~rd

1225

South SixthSisect

Springfield, tllinoi~62703

2l:C:n0W:~Lthr$5

21:DLC~OW:NLfur5$

Robert

Lawley

CI~efLepiCounsel

Illinois ~epa~ti~ntofNatiaral Resources

524

South Second Seteet

Spring~eld.illinois

62701

Robert

Mes~irja

illinoisEnviosnrnentsl

ii1at~ryGroop

215 FastAdams

$tftee

Sprin~Ield,ilhinoin 62701

Torn MuSh

FoxMetro

Walter

lceelasr,nfign Duels;

682

State

Route 31

O$WgO,

Illinois 60543

2l:DLC:~0W:NT.

for$S

IrWiAPOllS

Metwpo1ic~nWeter Reclamation District ofChcago

600lWcstPershing Road

Cicero, 1llisoI~

6080d-4fl2

21:DL8QW’~tJ.tbr

Maxfe Tipsord

Hearing Officer

IllinoisPollutionCon~ol~oau1

100 Wcst Randolph Stect. Suite 11-500

Chicag; Ulutois 60601

21:DLC:B0W~NLfur SS

Callahan

Bloomington Nonnal WaterRechirnationDistrict

p0g

Oftce Box 3301

Bloomington, Ifunois

61102-3307

2I:bLC:aOW~SLfu~

Zl:DBQW~1SL

mess

21~PLC~0W:NLrorss

2t:DLC~0W:NLfur

Zt~DLC~0W:NL

for 55

l1ciaow~r~LSte55

Z1~DL.O8OW~NLfcr

2t~DLC.U0W:NLforCS

21:DLOBOW:NLfbr$6

TIJTflL

P.25