1. NOTICE OF FILING
    2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    3. BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    4. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
    5. COUNT I
    6. CAUSES THREATEN OR ALLOW WATER POLLUTION
    7. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. admits the
    8. allegations of Paragraph 1.
    9. The allegations of Paragraph 2 are conclusions of law to
    10. which no answer is required. The citations speak for themselves.
    11. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. admits the
    12. allegations of Paragraph 3.
    13. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. admits the
    14. allegations of Paragraph 4.
    15. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. admits only that it
    16. filed a notice for intent for coverage and the referenced document speaks for
    17. itself. The allegations of Paragraph 5 are improperly pled conclusions of fact
    18. and the Defendant moves to strike. Further, the Defendant lacks sufficient
    19. knowledge not contained in the referenced document regarding said conclusions
    20. and accordingly, if the motion to strike is denied, Defendant, Montalbano
    21. Builders, Inc. makes no answer to the remaining allegations, demanding strict
    22. proof thereof.
    23. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. admits the
    24. allegations of Paragraph 6.
    25. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
    26. knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 7 and therefore makes no
    27. answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
    28. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
    29. knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 8 and therefore makes no
    30. answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
    31. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
    32. knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 9 and therefore makes no
    33. answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
    34. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
    35. knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 10 and therefore makes no
    36. answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
    37. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
    38. knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 11 and therefore makes no
    39. answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
    40. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
    41. knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 12 and therefore makes no
    42. answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
    43. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
    44. knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 13 and therefore makes no
    45. answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
    46. ANSWER: The allegations of Paragraph 14 are conclusions of law to
    47. which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
    48. ANSWER: The allegations of Paragraph 15 are conclusions of law to
    49. which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
    50. ANSWER: The allegations of Paragraph 16 are conclusions of law to
    51. which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
    52. ANSWER: The allegations of Paragraph 17 are conclusions of law to
    53. which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
    54. ANSWER: To the extent that this Paragraph 18 may be considered to
    55. conclusions of law to which no answer is required.
    56. ANSWER: The allegations of Paragraph 19 are conclusions of law to
    57. which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
    58. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. denies the
    59. allegations of Paragraph 20.
    60. ANSWER: The allegations of Paragraph 21 are conclusions of law to
    61. which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
    62. ANSWER: The allegations of Paragraph 22 are conclusions of law to
    63. which no answer is required.
    64. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. denies the
    65. allegations of Paragraph 23.
    66. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. denies the
    67. allegations of Paragraph 24.
    68. COUNT II
    69. CREATING A WATER POLLUTION HAZARD
    70. ANSWER: Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. incorporates by reference
    71. its Answers to Paragraphs 1 through 13 as its answers to 1-13 of Count II as
    72. though fully set forth herein.
    73. ANSWER: The allegations of Paragraph 14 are conclusions of law to
    74. which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
    75. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. denies the
    76. allegations of Paragraph 15.
    77. COUNT III
    78. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE NPDES PERMIT
    79. ANSWER: Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. incorporates by reference
    80. its Answers to Paragraphs 1 through 13 as its answers to 1-13 of Count III as
    81. though fully set forth herein.
    82. ANSWER: The allegations of Paragraph 14 are conclusions of law to
    83. which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
    84. ANSWER: The allegations of Paragraph 15 are conclusions of law to
    85. which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
    86. ANSWER: No answer to Paragraph 16 is necessary as the Permit speaks
    87. dismiss Count III as the NPDES Permit is not attached.
    88. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
    89. knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 17 and therefore makes no
    90. answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
    91. ANSWER: To the extent that this Paragraph 18 may be considered to
    92. conclusions of law to which no answer is required.
    93. ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. denies the
    94. allegations of Paragraph 19.

(printed on recycled paper)
BEFORE THE ILLINOS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, )
ex rel.
LISA MADIGAN, Attorney
)
General of the State of Illinois,
)
No. PCB 09-030
)
(Enforcement - Water)
Complainant,
)
)
v.
)
)
MONTALBANO BUILDERS, INC.,
)
an Illinois corporation,
)
)
Respondent.
)
NOTICE OF FILING
TO: Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Zemeheret Bereket-Ab
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Bureau North
69 W. Washington Street
Suite 1800
Chicago, Illinois 60602
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE
that on December 31, 2008, the attached documents,
Respondent’s Appearance
and
Respondent’s Answer to Complaint
, were filed with
the Clerk of the Pollution Control Board.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I,
GLENN C. SECHEN
, an attorney, certify that I have served a copy of the
attached documents by regular mail upon the person(s) referenced above at or before
5:00 p.m. on the 6
th
day of January, 2009.
/s/
Glenn C. Sechen
Glenn C. Sechen, Counsel for the Respondent
Glenn C. Sechen
Schain, Burney, Ross & Citron, Ltd.
222 North LaSalle Street
Suite 1910
Chicago, IL 60601-4514
312/ 332-0200
F:\GCS\Montalbano\Harvard Hills, McHenry Cnty\Filed Pleadings\NOF 12-31-08.doc
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, January 6, 2009

(Printed on Recycled Paper)
BEFORE THE ILLINOS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, )
ex rel.
LISA MADIGAN, Attorney
)
General of the State of Illinois,
)
No. PCB 09-030
)
(Enforcement - Water)
Complainant,
)
)
v.
)
)
MONTALBANO BUILDERS, INC.,
)
an Illinois corporation,
)
)
Respondent.
)
APPEARANCE
Glenn C. Sechen, James R. Griffin and M. Hope Whitfield hereby enter their
appearance on behalf of the Respondent, Montalbano Builders, Inc.
/s/
Glenn C. Sechen
Attorney for the Respondent
/s/
James Griffin
Attorney for the Respondent
/s/ M. Hope Whitfield
Attorney for the Respondent
Certificate of Service
The undersigned hereby certifies that on the 6
th
day of January, 2009, a copy of the
above was served upon:
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control Board
James R. Thompson Center
100 W. Randolph Street
Suite 11-500
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Zemeheret Bereket-Ab
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Bureau North
69 W. Washington Street, Suite 1800
Chicago, Illinois 60602
by placing the same in the U.S. Mail at 222 N. LaSalle, with proper postage affixed,
before the hour of 5:00 p.m.
By: /s/ Glenn C. Sechen
Attorney for the Respondent
F:\GCS\Montalbano\Harvard Hills, McHenry Cnty\Filed Pleadings\Appearance.doc
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, January 6, 2009

BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, )
ex rel.
LISA MADIGAN, Attorney
)
General of the State of Illinois,
)
No. PCB 09-030
)
(Enforcement - Water)
Complainant,
)
)
v.
)
)
MONTALBANO BUILDERS, INC.,
)
an Illinois corporation,
)
)
Respondent.
)
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Respondent, MONTALBANO BUILDERS, through their attorneys, SCHAIN,
BURNEY, ROSS & CITRION, LTD., answers the complaint of the People of the State of
Illinois, as follows:
COUNT I
CAUSES THREATEN OR ALLOW WATER POLLUTION
1.
This Complaint is brought on behalf of the PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
ILLINOIS
ex rel.
LISA MADIGAN, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, on her own
motion and at the request of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency ("Illinois
EPA"), pursuant to Section 31 of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act ("Act"), 415
ILCS 5/31 (2006).
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. admits the
allegations of Paragraph 1.
2.
The Illinois EPA is an administrative agency of the State of Illinois, created
pursuant to Section 4 of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/4 (2006), and charged,
inter alia,
with the
duty of enforcing the Act. The Illinois EPA is further charged with the duty to abate
violations of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") Permit
Program under the Federal Clean Water Act ("CWA"), 33 U.S.C. §1342(b)(7).
ANSWER:
The allegations of Paragraph 2 are conclusions of law to
which no answer is required. The citations speak for themselves.
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, January 6, 2009

2
3.
At all times relevant to the Complaint, Respondent, Montalbano Builders,
Inc., ("Montalbano"), is an Illinois corporation in good standing.
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. admits the
allegations of Paragraph 3.
4.
Montalbano is engaged in the development of a 393 lot residential
subdivision with single family homes known as the Huntington Ridge subdivision located
on the southwest corner of Harvard Hills and Crowley Roads in Harvard, McHenry
County, Illinois ("Site").
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. admits the
allegations of Paragraph 4.
5.
On June 5, 2006, Montalbano submitted to the Illinois EPA a notice of
intent for coverage under the NPDES stormwater permit for the Site. The Site is 193
acres in size and the receiving stream for stormwater runoff from the Site is known as
Mokeler Creek. Adjacent to the Site there is a wetland flood plain which discharges in
Mokeler Creek.
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. admits only that it
filed a notice for intent for coverage and the referenced document speaks for
itself. The allegations of Paragraph 5 are improperly pled conclusions of fact
and the Defendant moves to strike. Further, the Defendant lacks sufficient
knowledge not contained in the referenced document regarding said conclusions
and accordingly, if the motion to strike is denied, Defendant, Montalbano
Builders, Inc. makes no answer to the remaining allegations, demanding strict
proof thereof.
6.
On July 6, 2006, the Illinois EPA granted Montalbano coverage under the
NPDES stormwater permit for stormwater associated with construction activity.
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. admits the
allegations of Paragraph 6.
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, January 6, 2009

3
7.
On April 17, 2007, the McHenry County Soil and Water Conservation
District ("MCSWCD") inspected the Site to determine the effectiveness of erosion and
sediment control measures in preventing water pollution. During the inspection
MCSWCD observed that unstabilized and inadequate erosion controls over portions of
the Site had allowed silt-laden runoff to threaten wetland area just offsite the
development.
ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 7 and therefore makes no
answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
8.
The MCSWCD also noted a portable diesel fuel tank located at the Site
which had no secondary spill containment and evidence of spilled fuel
was
found on the
ground near the tank.
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 8 and therefore makes no
answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
9.
On May 9, 2007, the Illinois EPA conducted a Stormwater Construction
Site Inspection to review the erosion control measures employed at the Site. The Illinois
EPA's inspection was prompted by reports received from the MCSWCD.
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 9 and therefore makes no
answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
10.
During the May 9, 2007, Illinois EPA inspection, the inspector observed
that disturbed areas where no construction activity had been occurring for over three
weeks did not have temporary stabilization in place.
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 10 and therefore makes no
answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, January 6, 2009

4
11.
The inspector also observed evidence of sediments leaving the Site and
entering the adjacent wetland whose water eventually discharges into Mokeler Creek.
Some silt fences were installed in low-lying areas of the Site and were partially under
water accumulated in those areas.
ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 11 and therefore makes no
answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
12.
The inspector also observed that the final stormwater detention basin was
not stabilized and sediments were observed in the final manhole prior to the discharge
point.
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 12 and therefore makes no
answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
13.
The Illinois EPA inspector also observed that the diesel fuel storage tank
found by the MCSWCD during its April 17, 2007 inspection, was not properly protected
with dykes, curbing or some other form of containment for spills. No spill kits were noted
and storm sewer inlets were not designed to contain fuel spills.
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 13 and therefore makes no
answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
14.
Section 12(a) of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/12(a) (2006), provides as follows: No
person shall:
(a)
Cause or threaten or allow the discharge of any contaminants
into the environment in any State so as to cause or tend to
cause water pollution in Illinois, either alone or in combination
with matter from other sources, or so as to violate regulations
or standards adopted by the Pollution Control Board under this
Act.
ANSWER:
The allegations of Paragraph 14 are conclusions of law to
which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, January 6, 2009

5
15.
Section 3.315 of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/3.315 (2006), provides as follows:
"Person" is any individual, partnership, co-partnership, firm,
company, limited liability company, corporation, association, joint
stock company, trust, estate, political subdivision state agency or any
other legal entity, or their legal representative, agent or assigns.
ANSWER:
The allegations of Paragraph 15 are conclusions of law to
which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
16.
Montalbano, a corporation, is a "person" as that term is defined in Section
3.315 of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/3.315 (2006).
ANSWER:
The allegations of Paragraph 16 are conclusions of law to
which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
17.
Section 3.165 of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/3.165 (2006), provides as follows:
"CONTAMINANT" is any solid, liquid, or gaseous matter, any odor,
or any form of energy, from whatever source.
ANSWER:
The allegations of Paragraph 17 are conclusions of law to
which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
18.
Silt laden runoff which entered the adjacent wetland and eventually
discharged into Mokeler Creek is a "contaminant," as that term is defined by Section
3.165 of the Act.
ANSWER:
To the extent that this Paragraph 18 may be considered to
contain factual allegations they are denied. The allegations of Paragraph 18 are
conclusions of law to which no answer is required.
19.
Section 3.545 of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/3.545 (2006), provides as follows:
"WATER POLLUTION" is such alteration of the physical, thermal,
chemical, biological or radioactive properties of any waters of the
State, or such discharge of any contaminant into any waters of the
State, as will or likely to create a nuisance or render such waters
harmful or detrimental or injurious to public health, safety, or welfare,
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, January 6, 2009

or
.
domestic, commercial, industrial, agricultural, recreational, or other
legitimate uses, or to livestock, wild animals, birds, fish, or other
aquatic life.
ANSWER:
The allegations of Paragraph 19 are conclusions of law to
which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
20.
The silt-laden runoff from the Site that flowed into Mokeler Creek constitutes
"water pollution," as that term is defined by Section 3.545 of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/3.545
(2006).
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. denies the
allegations of Paragraph 20.
21.
Section 3.550 of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/3.550 (2006), provides as follows:
• "WATERS" means all accumulations of water, surface and
underground, natural, and artificial, public and private, or parts
thereof, which are wholly or partially within, flow through, or border
upon the State.
ANSWER: The allegations of Paragraph 21 are conclusions of law to
which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
22.
The adjacent wetland and Mokeler Creek into which the wetland discharges
to are "waters," as that term is defined in Section 3.550 of the Act.
ANSWER: The allegations of Paragraph 22 are conclusions of law to
which no answer is required.
23.
By allowing disturbed soils to remain unstabilized and without adequate
erosion control protection, Respondent caused, threatened or allowed the discharge of
a contaminant, silt-laden runoff, into the environment.
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. denies the
allegations of Paragraph 23.
24.
By causing, threatening or allowing the discharge of silt-laden runoff from
the Site, "contaminants," to discharge into the adjacent wetland and eventually into
Mokeler Creek, a water of the State, Respondent caused, threatened or allowed water
pollution in Illinois, in violation of Section 12(a) of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/12(a)(2006).
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, January 6, 2009

7
ANSWER: The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. denies the
allegations of Paragraph 24.
WHEREFORE, Montalbano Builders, Inc., prays that this Count be dismissed at
plaintiff’s cost.
COUNT II
CREATING A WATER POLLUTION HAZARD
1-13. Complainant realleges and incorporates by reference herein paragraphs 1
through 13 of Count I as paragraphs I through 13
,
of this Count 1I.
ANSWER: Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. incorporates by reference
its Answers to Paragraphs 1 through 13 as its answers to 1-13 of Count II as
though fully set forth herein.
14.
Section 12(d) of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/12(d) (2006), provides as follows: No
person shall:
*
*
*
*
(d)
Deposit any contaminants upon the land in such place and
manner so as to create a water pollution hazard.
ANSWER:
The allegations of Paragraph 14 are conclusions of law to
which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
15.
By allowing disturbed soils and soil stockpiles with inadequate erosion
controls to remain adjacent to wetland areas, thus creating a water pollution hazard,
Montalbano violated Section 12(d) of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/12(d) (2006).
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. denies the
allegations of Paragraph 15.
WHEREFORE, Montalbano Builders, Inc., prays that this Count be dismissed at
Plaintiff’s cost.
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, January 6, 2009

8
COUNT III
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF THE NPDES PERMIT
1-13. Complainant realleges and incorporates by reference herein paragraphs 1
through 13 of Count I as paragraphs 1 through 13 of this Count III.
ANSWER: Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. incorporates by reference
its Answers to Paragraphs 1 through 13 as its answers to 1-13 of Count III as
though fully set forth herein.
14.
Section 12(f) of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/12(f) (2006), provides as follows: No
person shall:
*
*
*
*
(f)
Cause, threaten, or allow the discharge of any contaminant into
the waters of the State,
as
defined herein, including but not
limited to, any waters to any sewage works, or into any well or
from any point source within the State, without an NPDES
permit for point source discharges issued by the Agency under
Section 39(b) of this Act, or in violation of any NPDES permit
filing requirement established under Section 39(b), or in
violation of any regulations adopted by the Board or of any
order adopted by the Board with respect to the NPDES
program.
ANSWER:
The allegations of Paragraph 14 are conclusions of law to
which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
15.
Section 309.102(a) of the Illinois Pollution Control Board Water Pollution
regulations ("Board Water Pollution Regulations"), 35 Ili. Adm. Code 309.102(a),
provides as follows:
a. Except as in compliance with the provisions of the Act, Board
regulations and the CWA, and the provisions and conditions of the
NPDES permit issued to the discharger, the discharge of any
contaminant or pollutant by any person into the waters of the State
from a point source or into a well shall be unlawful.
ANSWER: The allegations of Paragraph 15 are conclusions of law to
which no answer is required. The cited section further speaks for itself.
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, January 6, 2009

9
16.
Montalbano's General NPDES Permit for Stormwater Discharges from
Construction Site Activities No. ILR10, Part IV. D.2(a) provides in pertinent part as
follows:
"... stabilization measures shall be initiated as soon as practicable in
portions of the site where construction activities have temporarily or
permanently ceased, but in no case more than 14 days after the
construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or
permanently ceased."
ANSWER:
No answer to Paragraph 16 is necessary as the Permit speaks
for itself. Further, the Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc., moves to strike and
dismiss Count III as the NPDES Permit is not attached.
17
The Illinois EPA inspector observed that a large part of the site remained
dormant for more than 21 days and had not been stabilized within 14 days as required
by NPDES Permit No. ILR10 Part IV.D.2(a).
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. lacks sufficient
knowledge to answer the allegations of Paragraph 17 and therefore makes no
answer and demands strict proof of the allegations therein.
18.
The discharge of silt-laden runoff from the Site into the adjacent wetland
and eventually into Mokeler Creek is a violation of Respondent's general NPDES
stormwater permit and is therefore a violation of Section 309.102(a) of the Board Water
Pollution Regulations, 35 Ill. Adm. Code 309.102(a).
ANSWER:
To the extent that this Paragraph 18 may be considered to
contain factual allegations they are denied. The allegations of Paragraph 18 are
conclusions of law to which no answer is required.
19.
By failing to maintain adequate stormwater pollution prevention measures
as called for by its coverage under the general NPDES stormwater permit at its
construction Site, Respondent also violated Section 12(f) of the Act, 415 ILCS 5/12(f)
(2006).
ANSWER:
The Defendant, Montalbano Builders, Inc. denies the
allegations of Paragraph 19.
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, January 6, 2009

10
WHEREFORE, Montalbano Builders, Inc. prays that this Count be
dismissed at plaintiff’s cost.
Respectfully Submitted,
MONTALBANO BUILDERS, INC.
By: /s/Glenn C. Sechen
One of Its Attorneys
Glenn C. Sechen
Schain, Burney, Ross & Citron, Ltd.
222 No. LaSalle Street
Suite 1910
Chicago, IL 60601
(312) 332-0200
Attorney ID#91873
(printed on recycled paper)
F:\GCS\Montalbano\Harvard Hills, McHenry Cnty\Filed Pleadings\Answer to Complaint FNL.doc
Electronic Filing - Received, Clerk's Office, January 6, 2009

Back to top