ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April 21, 1994
AMERICAN TREE SERVICE, INC.,
)
an Illinois Corporation,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
P~B94—43
)
(Permit Appeal)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE
BOARD (by C. A. Manning):
On February 3, 1994, American Tree Service, Inc., (American)
filed an amended petition for permit review regarding its
facility, located in Sangamon County. The Board directed this
matter to be set for hearing on February 3, 1994. On March 28,
1994 The Val—E-Vue Improvement Association (Association) filed a
motion to intervene as a respondent in this proceeding pursuant
to 35 Iii.
Adm.
Code 103.142. It is this motion which is the
subject of this order.
The Val-E-Vue subdivision is a residential subdivision
located less than one mile from the Petitioner’s facility in
Springfield,
Illinois. The Association represents itself as an
Illinois Corporation, incorporated under the General Not For
Profit Corporation Act on
October 8,
1956. The Association
opposes the issuance of a
permit to American that would allow the
burning of landscape waste. The Association claims that the
current permit issued to American is in violation of Illinois law
and that its members are detrimentally affected by American’s
activities.
However, the Association has not provided any legal
arguments or authority in support of its request for the Board to
grant the motion to intervene in the permit process that is
before the Board. Rather, case law clearly provides that the
Board has no authority to grant a motion to intervene in an air
permit case or to even allow a third party appeal of the issuance
of an air permit. (County of LaSalle v. Illinois
Pollution
Control Board, (August 26,
1986), 146 Ill. App. 3d 603, 497 N.E.
2d 164, 100 Ill. Dec. 284; See also•Ohio Grain ComDanv v.
Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency, (December 17, 1992),
PCB 90-143.) In County of LaSalle
the appellate court upheld the
Board’s ruling that
the Environmental Protection Act (Act)
provided no authority for the Board to allow intervention in
certain permit appeals.
Id.
at 290. In addition, the courts
have stated that there is no right for third party appeals of an
2
Agency issuance of permits other than where it is specifically
allowed for by the Act. (Landfill Inc. v. Pollution Control
Board (1978), 74 Ill. 2d 541, 387 N.E.2d 258.) In Landfill Inc~
the court said that “(t)he grant of a permit does not insulate
violators of the Act or give them a license to pollute; however,
a citizen’s statutory remedy is a new complaint against the
polluter, not an action before the Board challenging the Agency’s
performance of its statutory duties in issuing a permit.” Id. at
609.
Therefore, while the Association may be free to make its
arguments in another proceeding before the Board, it can not do
so in this context. Moreover the Association is not prohibited
from participating in any public hearing which might be held in
this matter pursuant to 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 103.
Additionally, the Board will allow the Association to file an
amicus curiae brief at the close of the hearing pursuant to the
briefing schedule as developed by the hearing officer.
The Board denies the motion to intervene filed on March 28,
1994 by the Association and directs this matter is to proceed to
hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certif that the above order was adopted on the
~
day of
__________________,
1994, by a vote of
h-”
/
c7~J
‘~-~t-~
~•
Dorothy M./~unn,Clerk
Illinois ~llution Control Board