ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September 9, 1993
Mobil Oil Corporation,
Petitioner,
v.
)
PCB 93—166
(Variance)
ILLINOIS ENVIRONNENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
)
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD (by R.C. Flemal):
On September 7, 1993, Mobil Oil Corporation filed a petition
for variance from 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.586 for 95 facilities
located in various counties in the Chicago Metropolitan
Statistical Area. That petition is deficient in that it fails to
provide certain information.
Pertaining to the petition as a whole, the Board notes that
Mobil has requested a variance applicable to each of 95 different
facilities without providing information specific to each
facility or explaining why factual information or circumstances
(e.g., on arbitrary or unreasonable hardship) may or may not be
different for each facility.
In addition, the Board notes that information is
specifically lacking concerning:
The names and addresses of each affected facility and
the location of the nearest air monitoring station,
pursuant to 35 Ill. Adrn. Code 104.121(d)
An assessment, with supporting factual information, of
the environmental impact that the variance will impose
on human, plant and animal life in the affected area,
including, where applicable, data describing the
existing air and water quality which the discharge may
affect, as required by 35 Ill. Adm. Code 104.121(g)
(emphasis added)
A concise factual statement of the reasons the
petitioner believes that compliance with the particular
provisions of the regulations or Board order would
impose an arbitrary or unreasonable hardship; as
required by 35 Ill. Adm. Code 104.121(k).
2
You are also referred to the Board’s procedural rules at
Section 101.103 and Appendix A for form of documents
requirements.
The Board further notes that “group variances” of the sort
requested here are uncommon and have only been granted in certain
unusual circumstances. (Village of Bloomningdale v. IEPA (Nov. 2,
1978), PCB 78—124, 32 PCB 23; ~f~nnaCity v. IEPA (April 18,
1985), PCB 85-40, 63 PCB 503.). The Board accordingly requests
that petitioner brief the issue of the need for a “group
variance” versus some alternate form of relief. Lastly, the
Board notes that if a group variance is to proceed, it desires
briefs on the issue of whether it is required that a hearing be
held in each of the affected counties.
Unless an amended petition is filed within 45 days of the
date of this order, curing the above—noted defect(s), this matter
will be subject to dismissal. The Board notes that for purposes
of calculation of the decision deadline pursuant to Section 38 of
the Act, the filing of an amended petition will restart the
Board’s 120—day deadline.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy N. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify that the above order was adopted on the
~z7
day of
_______________,
1993, by a vote of
________
~
Dorothy M. ~Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board