ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    September 9, 1993
    Mobil Oil Corporation,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 93—166
    (Variance)
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONNENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    )
    Respondent.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD (by R.C. Flemal):
    On September 7, 1993, Mobil Oil Corporation filed a petition
    for variance from 35 Ill. Adm. Code 218.586 for 95 facilities
    located in various counties in the Chicago Metropolitan
    Statistical Area. That petition is deficient in that it fails to
    provide certain information.
    Pertaining to the petition as a whole, the Board notes that
    Mobil has requested a variance applicable to each of 95 different
    facilities without providing information specific to each
    facility or explaining why factual information or circumstances
    (e.g., on arbitrary or unreasonable hardship) may or may not be
    different for each facility.
    In addition, the Board notes that information is
    specifically lacking concerning:
    The names and addresses of each affected facility and
    the location of the nearest air monitoring station,
    pursuant to 35 Ill. Adrn. Code 104.121(d)
    An assessment, with supporting factual information, of
    the environmental impact that the variance will impose
    on human, plant and animal life in the affected area,
    including, where applicable, data describing the
    existing air and water quality which the discharge may
    affect, as required by 35 Ill. Adm. Code 104.121(g)
    (emphasis added)
    A concise factual statement of the reasons the
    petitioner believes that compliance with the particular
    provisions of the regulations or Board order would
    impose an arbitrary or unreasonable hardship; as
    required by 35 Ill. Adm. Code 104.121(k).

    2
    You are also referred to the Board’s procedural rules at
    Section 101.103 and Appendix A for form of documents
    requirements.
    The Board further notes that “group variances” of the sort
    requested here are uncommon and have only been granted in certain
    unusual circumstances. (Village of Bloomningdale v. IEPA (Nov. 2,
    1978), PCB 78—124, 32 PCB 23; ~f~nnaCity v. IEPA (April 18,
    1985), PCB 85-40, 63 PCB 503.). The Board accordingly requests
    that petitioner brief the issue of the need for a “group
    variance” versus some alternate form of relief. Lastly, the
    Board notes that if a group variance is to proceed, it desires
    briefs on the issue of whether it is required that a hearing be
    held in each of the affected counties.
    Unless an amended petition is filed within 45 days of the
    date of this order, curing the above—noted defect(s), this matter
    will be subject to dismissal. The Board notes that for purposes
    of calculation of the decision deadline pursuant to Section 38 of
    the Act, the filing of an amended petition will restart the
    Board’s 120—day deadline.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Dorothy N. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the above order was adopted on the
    ~z7
    day of
    _______________,
    1993, by a vote of
    ________
    ~
    Dorothy M. ~Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board

    Back to top