ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    March 26, 1992
    RUSSELL L. BACON,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 92—1
    )
    (Underground Storage
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONNENTAL
    )
    Tank Reimbursement)
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    Respondent.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD (by G.T. Girard):
    On March 11, 1992, the Board entered an order granting the
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s motion to dismiss
    petitioner’s petition for review of the Agency’s underground
    storage tank (UST) decision. Petitioner stipulated to the
    Agency’s motion to dismiss based upon Ideal Heating Co. v. IEPA
    (January 23, 1992), PCB 91-253. For the following reasons, the
    Board on its own motion vacates its dismissal order of March 11,
    1992 and reinstates petitioner’s petition for review of the
    Agency’s UST Fund reimbursement decision.
    The Agency’s motion to dismiss was based upon Ideal Heating
    Co. v. IEPA (January 23, 1992), PCB 91-253. The Agency argued
    that under Ideal Heating the instant appeal is not ripe and
    should be dismissed. In Ideal Heating, the Board ruled that
    Agency UST decisions are ripe for Board review when the Agency
    has: (1) denied eligibility; or (2) granted eligibility and
    completed its deductible and reimbursement determinations.
    Consequently, Agency determinations on the deductible amount
    alone are no longer appealable. The Board reached this ruling
    based upon in part upon the desire to avoid piecemeal appeals.
    (Id. at 2.)
    However, the Board declines to extend its holding in Ideal
    Heating to cases where the Agency has reached a determination on
    an applicant’s claim for reimbursement of corrective action
    costs, but other claims for the same site are still pending
    before the Agency or will be submitted in the future. (See also,
    City of Roodhouse v. IEPA (March 26, 1992) PCB 92—31; The Pumper
    v. IEPA (March 26, 1992), PCB 91-262.) While the Board has
    expressed a desire to avoid piecemeal appeals, the Board finds
    this goal has been achieved by the ruling in Ideal Heating.
    Because costs of corrective action can be great, it is important
    that claims for reimbursement be resolved as quickly as possible,
    even though other claims may be pending before the Agency. The
    Board will not promote administrative economy at the expense of
    environmental cleanup.
    13 1—525
    Therefore, the Board vacates its prior order dismissing this
    case and reinstates the petition for review. The Board notes
    that its 120-day decision deadline, is not extended by the prior
    order and begins to run from the date the petition was filed.
    This matter shall proceed to hearing consistent with this Board’s
    January 9. 1992 order.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, porothy N. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board hereby certify that the above order was adopted on the
    ~
    day of
    ~~-t~LJ
    ,
    1992 by a vote of 7~0
    Dorothy M.,4~’unn,
    2~.
    Cler’k
    Illinois P~LlutionControl Board
    13 1—526

    Back to top