ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    May 24, 1990
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION AGENCY
    Complainant,
    v.
    )
    PCB 90—37
    (Enforcement)
    NESCO STEEL BARREL COMPANY
    Respondent.
    DISSENTING OPINION (by B. Forcade):
    Although I agree with the majority that Count I should not
    be dismissed, I disagree with the majority dismissal of Count IV.
    Accordingly, I dissent. In addition, I fear the Board is
    starting to equate the Section 31(d) notice with handing the
    respondent a draft copy of the complaint, complete with all the
    specifics. I find no requirement in the Act for such
    specificity.
    Regarding Count IV, the majority reaffirms that compliance
    with the requirements of Section 31(d) is accomplished by actual
    notice to the respondent during the discussions with the Agency.
    See IEPA v. Mervis Industries, Inc., PCB 88—36 (May 5, 1988).
    The Agency has asserted that such discussions took place. In
    reply, Nesco attacks the Agency’s lack of specificity, but does
    not specifically deny the validity of the claim, nor does Nesco
    provide factual support or assertions that it did not acquire
    actual notice under the theory of Mervis Industries.
    If Mervis Industries is still good law, then the Board
    presently has a question of fact before it: whether such
    discussions took place as to provide Nesco with actual notice.
    Unfortunately, the Board has no facts before it. The Board has
    one ASSERTION from the Agency that such discussions took Diace,
    but that assertion is not supported by testimony or affidavit.
    Nesco did not even bother to ASSERT that such discussions did not
    take place. Accordingly, I am not able to decide this question
    of fact based on one unverified assertion and a failure to deny
    that assertion. Since Nesco must carry the burden in its motion
    to dismiss, I would deny the motion.
    ~\ \•~~
    Bill S. Forcade
    Board Member
    111—421

    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the above Dissenting Opinion was filed
    on the ~
    day of
    _____________________
    ,
    1990.
    Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    111—422

    Back to top