ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    April 16, 1987
    A.,R.,FI,
    LANDFILL CORPORATION,
    )
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 87—34
    VILLAGE OF ROUND LAKE PARK
    AND LAKE COUNTY,
    )
    Respondents.
    ORDER OF THE BOARD (by J.. Anderson):
    In its Order of March 19, 1987, the Board noted that:
    “A.,R..F..’s siting application appeal states that the
    proposed facility
    “~.
    would be partially located
    in Round Lake Park., That part of the proposed site
    that would not be located in Round Lake Park would
    be located in unincorporated Lake County” (Appeal,
    2)., Because a portion of the facility is located
    in unincorporated Lake County, this Board is
    uncertain whether Lake County is a necessary party
    to this proceeding, under Section 39(c) of the Act
    which cQntrols jurisdiction for siting
    applications.
    The Board has not been briefed on what role, if
    any, Lake County should have in this process..
    Consequently, the Board, on its own motion, will
    join Lake County as a party respondent for purposes
    of determining whether Lake County is a necessary
    party., Any party, including Lake County, may file
    motions and briefs opposing or supporting this
    joinder not later than April 10, 1987.,”
    On April 10, Lake County filed a motion in support of) joinder;
    the village of Round Lake Park filed a similar motion on April
    13.. On April 10, A.,R.,F~ filed a motion to exclude Lake County as
    a party.. As each of these “motions” is a response to the Board’s
    Order, which articulates each parties position, and as 30 days of
    the Board’s 120 day period for hearing and decision have already
    elapsed, the Board will not delay decision to await additional
    comments by the parties.,
    The pleadings before the Board indicate that in order to
    resolve the issues presented in this appeal, the Board may well
    77-176

    —2--
    be required to make factual findings concerning actions and
    positions taken by Lake County in determining the correctness of
    actions taken by the Village..
    The Board believes that participation by Lake County as a
    party which can speak by and for itself rather than as a witness
    which can speak only for and through another party will develop a
    superior record upon which to base the Board’s determination of
    what appear to be novel issues., The Board continues to find that
    Lake County is a necessary party respondent.. A.,R..F..’s motion to
    exclude Lake County is therefore denied, and the motions of the
    County and village for joinder are granted..
    IT IS SO ORDERED.,
    3., T.. Meyer dissented..
    I, Dorothy M.. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that th.e above Order was adopted on
    the
    ~
    day of
    ___________________,
    1987, by a vote
    of
    ____________.,
    II
    ~
    /j ~
    ~
    Dorothy N. c~unn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board
    77-177

    Back to top